DOCSLIB.ORG

Tower of Babel. (Robert Pennock)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tower of Babel. (Robert Pennock) Home | Intro | About | Feedback | Prev | Next | Search Was Darwin Wrong? Healing existential worries Robert Pennock's Tower of Babel. A review by Gert Korthof 2 May 1999. Updated 13 May 2001 The main goal of Tower of Babel is to evaluate the position of the Intelligent Design Theorists Michael Behe (biochemist), Phillip Johnson (lawyer), William Dembski (mathematician) and Alvin Plantinga (philosopher). Some attention is also given to the views of Young Earth Creationists John and Henry Morris, Old Earth Creationists (Fred Heeren and Hugh Ross) and Theistic Evolutionists such as Arthur Peacocke and Howard van Till. However, with a little exaggeration, this is a book about Phillip Johnson's views. This book. His sources are not only academic books and he read their books, went to their book is philosophy journals. Typically Internet sites are listed in meetings and conferences, including from a the References, Notes and in some places in the text. a 'guided tour of the Museum of professional The subtitle of the book The Evidence against the New Creation' and discussed with a lot of philosopher Creationism makes it clear that it is a criticism of the them personally. He is good at [1]. But not 'New Creationism', if you wish an 'attack', but it is not creeping into their skins: who are a from an atheist. Robert Pennock is a Quaker. So this is they? What do they want? What philosopher not an anti-religious book. He is a theist criticising other drives them? What are their worries? who is only theists [10]. Pennock gives a philosophical defence of The title of The Tower of Babel interested in evolution, so he is also an 'Evolutionist' [2]. In his view refers to the biblical story of the the history evolution is compatible with theism, so he could be a origin of human languages. Pennock of ideas starting with Plato and 'theistic evolutionist' or a deist. He does not tell anything uses the origin of languages to "spell Aristotle and ending with Popper about his own beliefs, rather his position must be out some of the structural parallels and Kuhn. Philosophy is invoked at inferred from the persons he criticises and the way he between linguistic and biological the right moments when it is needed does it. Since he is also a biologist, he is well qualified evolutionary theory in the hope that for clarifying. There are also for the job. Furthermore he is well prepared to evaluate it can provide a therapeutic elements of story telling and neo-creationism, because personal details throughout the way through the emotional block for This concern reappears explicitly in the paragraphs S.J.Gould [9]: rewinding the tape of those who find it unpleasant or Calming the Creationist's Fears, Evolution Does Not evolution would not guarantee the re- troubling to think of themselves as Imply Atheism and Can We Seek Meaning Together? of occurrence of the human species. being descended from prior animal Chapter 7. As Pennock sees it, creationists fear And Pennock himself quotes forms." (P147). This is one of his evolution, because life is without purpose if 'natural Dawkins: "Evolution has no long- original contributions to the evolution' created us. And this should be so because term goal"(P261). The randomness Creation-Evolution Controversy. natural evolution is mindless and purposeless [3]. And of the mutational process, the Interesting as the linguistic example this derives from the essential random nature of impossibility of 'directed may be in itself, I see an underlying mutations which are the motor of evolution. evolution' [8], the lack of a long- motive suggested by the words term goal, and the long time span 'therapeutic' and 'emotional block' "When evolutionary biologists speak of 'evolution', they before the appearance of humans, all and that is a genuine interest in are not referring to a process that either was or could seem to suggest that the designer creationist worries. And this is a far have been guided by a supernatural could not create humans by means more important contribution to the Creator" (Johnson,1993,P115).[4] of evolution. In Johnson words: it Creation-Evolution Controversy contradicts that "mankind was than for example debunking This central conflict between purpose and randomness designed and exists for a creationists' positive evidence. always seemed to me one of the clearest arguments of purpose" (Johnson,1993,P115).[4] Johnson. It is confirmed by the well-known claim of Pennock does not see it in that way. He does not see randomness as the how we came to be. What appears to most important aspect of evolution "Tower of Babel. The Evidence be random in our eyes, could be anyway [5]. Pennock tries to show in purposeful in God's eyes (P335). against the New Creationism" at least 4 ways that evolution and 4. One conclusion we can draw from by Robert T. Pennock randomness are compatible with evolutionary theory is that a MIT Press,1999 design: Designer is not necessary to explain ISBN 0-262-16180-X 1. Pennock discovered that Johnson, microevolution and adaptation of 429 pages at least in some passages, admits organisms. (Pennock does not Contents: include macroevolution and the that evolution is not necessarily 1. Creation and Evolution of a Controversy...1 origin of life in this list!). However, atheistic [6]: "one can imagine a 2. The Evidence for Evolution...43 Creator who works through natural 3. The Tower of Babel...117 says Pennock, from the fact that X is selection" (P336) 4. Of Naturalism and Negativity...181 not necessary for Y, it does not 2. Dembski is undermined (P95): 5. Chariots of the Gods...215 follow that X does not exist. ! So chance and design are not mutually 6. Deus ex Machina...277 from the fact that God is not exclusive.[7] 7. Burning Science at the Stake...309 necessary for evolution, it does not 3. Could an omnipotent God not 8. Babel in the Schools...343 follow that God does not exist. In Notes...379 have allowed humans to arise this way Pennock argues that the References...399 fears of creationists for evolution are through an evolutionary process Index...413 while still giving us a moral code to unfounded because evolution does uphold and a purpose to fulfil ? not imply atheism (even Johnson (P339). The designer could give us accepted this, sometimes!) and spiritual purpose no matter scientific naturalism is not equivalent to atheism (P328). still exists in nature. We still have the same laws of Is war compatible with a meaningful An alternative view (not present in nature including randomness. We would still have life and high absolute moral Pennock) and a way out of the volcano eruptions, lightning and all kind of other natural standards? How far creationists need randomness-purpose conflict could disasters. to go partly depends on the be Christian de Duve's point of I doubt that Pennock convinces old-fashioned literalists. willingness of evolutionists and view: life, consciousness and However any creationist who accepts Pennock's (or de atheists to acknowledge that intelligence are a necessity, given Duve's) argument would be released from the war evolution logically does not imply the particular conditions existing on against evolution and evolutionists. And that makes the atheism. earth [11]. road free to seek meaning together. Let's hope that at Pennock doesn't seek conflict in However, creationists still could least some are convinced by Pennock's arguments. If the Tower of Babel. Pennock object that Genesis tells otherwise: not: is a creation myth really worth a war, considering intentions are honest and peaceful. the world, plants, animals and that the point of creation myths is giving human He tried to take away the 'how and humans were deliberately created existence meaning? How far can defenders of one why we came into existence'- and not the result of purposeless creation myth go in their war against the other creation worries, in other words: the processes. On the other hand even if myth and still have a meaningful life? existential worries of creationists. the world was created, randomness Notes: 5. In his summary of the four central elements of evolution theory 1. Philip Kitcher is another philosopher who undertook a 'randomness' is mentioned only as the second part of the 4th philosophical analysis of creationism: Abusing Science. The Case element! (P333). Against Creationism(1982). This work is not available anymore. 6. I could make the title of my review in Tom Woodward-style: The work of another philosopher, Del Ratzsch, The battle of "JOHNSON ADMITS EVOLUTION IS NOT NECESSARY Beginnings(1996) is still available. ATHEISTIC!" or: "JOHNSON ADMITS DARWINISM MIGHT 2. Nowadays 'Evolutionist' is a redundant characterisation of a BE THE BEST EXPLANATION OF THE DATA !" (P209). scientist, just as an 'atomist' (someone who believes all matter is 7. Dembski's The Design Inference(1998) is not in Pennock's composed of atoms) or 'heliocentrist' (someone who believes references. Pennock send his manuscript in 1998 to the publisher. planets are orbiting around the sun). Otherwise 'evolutionist' is a However there are 3 publicatons of Dembski in the references. biologist/biochemist specialised in evolution. A deist is someone 8. I showed in my review of Denton(1998) that DNA cannot be pre- who believes in a God who made the world but has no influence on programmed to direct the path of evolution to humans. human lives. 9. S.J. Gould(1997) Full House. 3. See also Note 13 in my review of Darwin on Trial: Johnson beliefs 10. However see Pennock's comments on this statement in the feedback in a whimsical creator.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesson 13 the Tower of Babel and the Mission Of
    May 26, 2019 God created everything in the world to declare Lesson 13 his glory. The Tower of Babel and the What did God say after each part of creation? Mission of God It was good. He created everything for his glory, but he created humans in his image. Does that mean we look like God? Not exactly. Whereas Genesis 11:1-9; Psalm 67; creation glorifies God by displaying his power Revelation 5:9-12 and beauty, we manifest his personal attributes like love, grace, mercy, and justice. A tree cannot Application – All believers have an important give you a hug and tell you it loves you. A tree role to play in fulfilling the mission of God. cannot defend the weak and stand against the proud. But a person can display those parts of Introduction God’s character. Genesis 1:28 explains, God What do you think of when you hear the word created us in his image and said, “Be fruitful, missions? Do you picture dirt floor huts, cold multiply, and fill the earth.” He tells them to fill showers, and strange food? Do you picture the earth with image bearers for God’s glory. lonely, isolated villages? Do you picture underground churches and missionaries dodging 2) The Fall: Genesis 3 shady international governments? Adam and Eve disobeyed God, eating the fruit of the tree from which he told them not to eat. At Missions may indeed involve some of those the Fall, sin and death entered the world for the things, but the Missio Dei, the mission of God, is first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tower of Babel: the Dispersion of God's People
    Denison Journal of Religion Volume 7 Article 3 2007 The oT wer of Babel: The Dispersion of God's People Stephanie Dixon Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Sociology of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Dixon, Stephanie (2007) "The oT wer of Babel: The Dispersion of God's People," Denison Journal of Religion: Vol. 7 , Article 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol7/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Journal of Religion by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. Dixon: The Tower of Babel: The Dispersion of God's People THE DENISON JOURNAL of RELIGION The Tower of Babel: The Dispersion of God’s People Stephanie Dixon he book of Genesis is filled with stories of how God and God’s creation interact. The book begins with the earth’s primordial couple, Adam Tand Eve. It continues by telling the story of the couple’s sons, Cain and Abel, and then moves into the story of the Great Flood and God’s relationship with Noah. After the Flood there comes a short but infamous story: the story of the Tower of Babel. What immediately distinguishes this story from those which precede it is the impersonality of the encounter between God and God’s creation. There is no main character with whom God communicates. Instead, God treats the whole of humanity. Though this could simply be a stylistic tactic of the sto- ryteller it also might be an indication that this story has a different purpose than those which come before it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tower of Babel Revisited: Global Governance As a Problematic Solution to Existential Threats, 19 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 2 1-1-2018 The oT wer of Babel Revisited: Global Governance as a Problematic Solution to Existential Threats Craig S. Lerner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Craig S. Lerner, The Tower of Babel Revisited: Global Governance as a Problematic Solution to Existential Threats, 19 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 69 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt/vol19/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 19, ISSUE 1: OCTOBER 2017 THE TOWER OF BABEL REVISITED: GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AS A PROBLEMATIC SOLUTION TO EXISTENTIAL THREATS Craig S. Lerner* The Biblical story of the Tower of Babel illuminates contemporary efforts to secure ourselves from global catastrophic threats. Our advancing knowledge has allowed us to specify with greater clarity the Floods that we face (asteroids, supervolcanoes, gamma-ray bursts, etc.); our galloping powers of technology have spawned a new class of human-generated dangers (climate change, nuclear war, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, etc.). Should any of these existential dangers actually come to pass, human beings, and even all life, could be imperiled. The claim that Man, and perhaps the Earth itself, hangs in the balance is said to imply the necessity of a global response.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 6 Print Reference: Pages 485-502 Article 39 2008 A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark Anne Habermehl Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Habermehl, Anne (2008) "A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 6 , Article 39. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol6/iss1/39 In A. A. Snelling (Ed.) (2008). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creationism (pp. 485–502). Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship and Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research. A Review of the Search for Noah’s Ark Anne Habermehl, B.Sc., 25 Madison Street, Cortland, NY 13045 Abstract There have been many alleged sightings of the Ark and numerous attempts to find it, mainly on Mount Ararat, but search attempts so far have been without success. In the light of history, geology, and archaeology, we need to consider that the Ark probably landed elsewhere, and that there may be little of it left.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamia and the Bible Came to Rest Atop the Mountains of Ararat
    family and one pair of every animal on Earth. When that was done, it Name began to rain heavily for forty days and forty nights. Even after the rain stopped, the water was still at such a high level that mountains remained submerged. During that period, Noah's Ark drifted from one place to another. Then, on the seventh day of the seventh month, it Mesopotamia and the Bible came to rest atop the mountains of Ararat. As the water kept receding, Noah and his boat mates continued seeking refuge inside the vessel. It By Vickie Chao was not until the first day of the first month in the following year that Noah finally opened the roof and saw the ground was dry. He and his Mesopotamia, home to the world's earliest civilization, was the companions got out of the ark on the twenty-seventh day of the foundation of modern culture. Located mostly in present-day Iraq, this second month. According to the Bible, Noah was 600 years old before stretch of land was part of the so-called Fertile Crescent. The Fertile the onset of the flood. He died at the age of 950. All humans born Crescent was an arc-shaped area nestled between the Mediterranean after the disaster were descendents of Noah's three sons and their Sea and the Persian Gulf. It bordered the Arabian Desert to the south wives. The story of Noah's Ark, in many ways, is strikingly similar to and the mountains of Armenia to the north. Dotted along the path the Epic of Gilgamesh.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biblical-Theological Perspective on Diversity & Racism
    A Biblical-Theological Perspective on Diversity & Racism 1. Diversity, in and of itself, is a God-created good that reflects the unity (oneness) and diversity (three-ness) of the Triune God. Christian theologians have argued that the doctrine of the Trinity—God as one in being and three in person—can serve as a model for human society and community. God’s oneness calls us to unity while his three-ness affirms our diversity and uniqueness. God’s handiwork, his creation, also reflects this unity in diversity. The incredibly rich diversity of uniquely individual creatures—of plants, animals, rocks and trees—are all created, united, and held together in Christ (Colossians 1:15–17). Even humanity was created with the diversity of male and female. It must be stressed, then, that creational diversity is never a diversity of division. It is not differences that divide; it is a diversity of unity— differences that are united in relationship to each other in love and obedience to God the creator. Thus, difference and diversity, in and of itself, is a created gift from God that reflects part of God’s own nature. And the unity that Christ brings through his redemptive work is not a new unity; it is restoring and renewing a unity that was already there at the beginning of creation, a unity that was disrupted by sin. 2. Ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity, in and of themselves, is not evil or sinful but fulfill a purpose in God’s plan for humanity. Among all of creation’s diversity, human cultural diversity, that is, ethnic and linguistic differences is part of God’s good creation.
    [Show full text]
  • 128 HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF: the "FALL" and NOAH's DRUNKENNESS Several Years Ago, Jack M. Sasson Made the Interesting O
    128 HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF: THE "FALL" AND NOAH'S DRUNKENNESS Several years ago, Jack M. Sasson made the interesting observa- tion that the episodes of the Primeval History (Gen. i-xi) have been arranged so that they form two parallel histories: from creation to the Nephilim, and from the Flood to the Tower of Babel. The crea- tion corresponds the re-creation of the world after the Flood; the Cain and Abel story and the story of the curse of Canaan are both "conflict of brother" stories; the list of Cain's descendants is parallel to the Table of Nations; and the story of the Nephilim and that of the Tower of Babel are both viewed as supreme examples of hubris. While the correspondence between the nephilim inci- 129 dent and the Tower of Babel story seems weak, perhaps the greatest difficulty with Sasson's hypothesis is that he finds no parallel to the story of Adam and Eve. Sasson's argument that the "Fall" was a "unique occasion" and could therefore have no parallel is uncon- vincing, for every event in the Primeval History-the creation of the world, the first murder, the dispersion of the nations, etc.-is in some sense a unique event. If there can be a parallel to the crea- tion of the world, why not a parallel to the Fall of humanity? Contrary to Sasson's understanding, there appears to be just such a parallel to the Fall within the Primeval History: the story of Noah's drunkenness (i.e., the curse of Canaan, Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:1-9)
    THE TOWER OF BABEL (GENESIS 11:1-9) By Kathy L. McFarland INTRODUCTION This paper will explore the significance of the account of the Tower of Babel recorded in Genesis 11:1-9 to determine whether it is a punishment of the LORD God for the arrogance and sinful natures of human beings or a work of God’s Grace to expand their presence throughout the world as promised in Genesis 10. Literary Features Genesis 11:1-9 narrative is divided into two parts, with an alternating chiastic structure.1 The human being words are contained within Genesis 11:1-4 and the Words of the LORD God are accounted in Genesis 11:5-9. This perspective emphasizes an important shift moving from human to divine God viewpoint2 with the critical Genesis 11:5 verse hinging the two parts together.3 Those perspectives are directly associated with each other’s narrative with a contrast of viewpoints easily discovered:4 1 Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2001), 176. 2 Johnny Cisneros, Babel, Tower Of, ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016). 3 H. Van Dyke Parunak, "Transitional Techniques in the Bible," Journal of Biblical Literature 102 (1983): 543. 1 Human Beings LORD God “One language and of one speech” (v1) “People is one and have one language” (v6) “Go to, let us …” (v3) “Let us go down” (v7) “Let us build us a city and a tower” (v4) “Left off to build the city” (v8) “Let us make us a name” (v4) “The name of it was Babel” (v9) “Lest we be scattered abroad upon the earth” (v4) “The Lord scattered them abroad” (v9) Clearly, a comparison of the speech differences between human beings and the LORD God show a clear conflict in purpose; this must be figured strongly in the analysis of God’s perspective concerning this event.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Babel: Yesterday and Today
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2003 The City of Babel: Yesterday and Today Raymond B. Marcin The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Raymond B. Marcin, The City of Babel: Yesterday and Today, 6 LOGOS: J. CATH. SOC. THOUGHT & CULTURE 120 (Winter 2003). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 06-logos-marcin-pp120-130 2/19/03 8:21 PM Page 120 Raymond B. Marcin The City of Babel: Yesterday and Today We all know the story. It is as old as the Bible itself. And it is as new as the Bible itself: These are the families of Noe, according to their peoples and nations. By these were the nations divided on the earth after the flood. And the earth was of one tongue, and of the same speech. And when they removed from the east, they found a plain in the land of Sennaar, and dwelt in it. And each one said to his neighbor: Come, let us make brick, and bake them with fire. And they had brick instead of stones, and slime instead of mortar. And they said: Come, let us make a city and a tower,the top whereof may reach to heaven: and let us make our name famous before we be scattered abroad into all lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 01 “What would Jesus Play?” - Actor-Centered Perspectives on Gaming and Gamers (In Lieu of an Introduction) Simone Heidbrink, Tobias Knoll & Jan Wysocki 17 Nephilim: Children of Lilith - The Place of Man in the Ontological and Cosmological Dualism of the Diablo, Darksiders and Devil May Cry Game Series Frank G. Bosman & Marcel Poorthuis 41 Living the Phantasm of Demediation - The Priest Kings and the Technology Prohibition in the Gorean Role-Playing Games Christophe Duret 61 “Venturing into the Unknown”(?) - Method(olog)ical Reflections on Religion and Digital Games, Gamers and Gaming Simone Heidbrink, Tobias Knoll & Jan Wysocki 85 Simulating the Apocalypse - Theology and Structure of the Left Behind Games Stephen Jacobs 107 The Politics of Pokemon – Socialized Gaming, Religious Themes and the Construction of Communal Narratives Marley-Vincent Lindsey 139 A Digital Devil’s Saga – Representation(s) of the Demon in Recent Videogames Jonathon O’Donnell 161 Prophecy, Pre-destination, and Free-form Gameplay - The Nerevarine Prophecy in Bethesda’s Morrowind Angus Slater Online – Heidelberg Journal for Religions on the Internet Volume 7 (2015) Religion in Digital Games Reloaded http://online.uni-hd.de Conference Papers: “Playing God” - On God & Game 185 Introduction: “Playing God” - On God & Game Frank G. Bosman 190 Beyond Belief - Playing with Pagan Spirituality in World of Warcraft Stef Aupers & Julian Schaap 207 “Are Those the Only Two Solutions?” - Dealing with Choice, Agency and Religion in Digital Games Tobias Knoll 227
    [Show full text]
  • Act Two: the Curse
    THE STORY OF THE BIBLE: LESSON THREE Act Two: The Curse I. INTRODUCTION The Storyline The biblical story begins by introducing the setting, main characters, and initial plot. In the first act of the biblical narrative, the reader learns that… Through the act of creation, God establishes his kingdom over all things and appoints human beings to rule on his behalf as his image bearers, to fill the earth and develop his creation into a glorious civilization. Like most every other story, the biblical narrative quickly runs into the conflict that needs to be overcome. The introduction of this conflict makes up the second act of the biblical story. Tragically, human beings rebel against God as they seek to rule God’s creation their own way, resulting in the curse of evil and death upon the world, which infects every aspect of God’s good creation. The Place of Act Two in the Bible Genesis 3–11 raise a number of puzzling issues for readers: the identity of Cain’s wife, the longevity of life spans, the identity of the “sons of God,” and the nature of the flood, to name a few. The danger contemporary readers face is to allow these issues to sidetrack one from the main thrust of what God wants to communicate in these chapters about the curse and how it thwarts his kingdom-purposes for creation. II. ACT TWO: THE CURSE The Event of the Fall (Gen 3:1–7) Human Freedom. The development of God’s creation into a glorious civilization requires cooperation, for humankind to exercise freedom under God’s reign.
    [Show full text]
  • Tower of Babel Al Klingler Denison University
    Denison Journal of Religion Volume 4 Article 5 2004 Tower of Babel Al Klingler Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Sociology of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Klingler, Al (2004) "Tower of Babel," Denison Journal of Religion: Vol. 4 , Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol4/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Journal of Religion by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. _j l Klingler: Tower of Babel IL THE DENISON JOURNAL of RELIGION Tower of Babel Al Klingler And all the earth was one language, one set of words. And it happened as they journeyed from the east that they found a valley in the land of Shinar and seUled there. And they said to each other, "Come, let us bake bricks and burn them hard." And the brick served them as stone, and bitumen served them as mortar. And they said, "Come, let us build us a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, that we may make us a name, lest we be scauered over all the earth." And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower that the human creatures had built. And the Lord said, "As one people with one language for al~ ifthis is what they have begun to do, nothing they plot will elude them. Come, let us go down and baffle their language there so that they will not understand each other's language." And the Lord scat­ tered them from there over all the earth and they left off building the city.
    [Show full text]