DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Brill.Com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM Via Free Access

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM Via Free Access Part 4 The Women Artists in Marianne Werefkin’s Larger Cultural Circle ⸪ Olga Furman - 9789004333147 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM via free access <UN> Olga Furman - 9789004333147 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM via free access chapter 14 Natalia Goncharova: Artistic Innovator and Inspiring Muse Olga Furman Abstract Placing Russian artist Natalia Goncharova at the crossroads of inspiring muse and artistic innovator, this essay highlights the exceptional role of Natalia Goncharova in Russian avant-garde art. Goncharova connected Russian modernism to its native sources in folk art and icon painting, thus promoting a new aesthetic positioned between East and West. The uniqueness of Goncharova’s work lies in its ability to remain faithful to the visual world and to nature and, at the same time, be modern and up-to-date. Particular focus is on the artist’s understanding of Russia’s national self- determination in the East-West coordinate system and her reflection of the principles of beauty, unity, and diversity in art. It is difficult to find another female artist in Russian art of the twentieth century who received the sort of impassioned, florid reviews that Natalia Goncharova did: A “strong and fine artist,” “battle-woman of Russian Futur- ism,” “Scythian priestess,” and “anti-artist”1—these are just some of the labels attached to her. Sergei Diaghilev called Goncharova a leading figure among the male-dominated circle of artists, saying that “all the youth of Moscow and St. Petersburg bow down to Goncharova.”2 The strong public sentiments and lofty clichés were in part an effort to permanently fix the artist’s changing im- age, but Goncharova always managed to sidestep such categorical expressions of admiration and to metamorphose into something else as her art continued to grow and change. 1 See Jane A. Sharp, Russian Modernism between East and West. Natal’ia Goncharova and the Moscow Avant-garde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 221–238. 2 “Гoнчapoвoй нынчe клaняeтcя вcя мocкoвcкaя и пeтepбуpгcкaя мoлoдeжь.” Marina Tsvetaeva, “Natalia Goncharova. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo” (Natalia Goncharova. Life and Work), in Natalia Goncharova. Mikhail Larionov. Vosponinaniya sovremennikov (Natalia Goncharova. MiMemories of Contemporaries), ed. Georgy F. Kovalenko (Moscow: Galart, 1995), 64. © Olga Furman, ���7 | doi �0.��63/9789004333�47_0�6 This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC License. Olga Furman - 9789004333147 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM via free access <UN> 194 Furman Goncharova’s artistic career in Russia reached its highpoint in 1913, the year when the first monograph on her and Mikhail Larionov was published, writ- ten by their artist friend Ilya Zdanevich (under the pseudonym Eli Eganburi).3 This same year, Goncharova took part in public debates, wore Futurist make- up, appeared in a film, illustrated Futurist books, worked on décor, drew wall- paper and clothes sketches, was awarded a contract for church murals and stained glass, and more; however, the most important event of the year for Goncharova was her solo exhibition of more than 750 works of art from the pe- riod 1900−13.4 At such a time, when the opportunities for women artists gradu- ating from art school were much more limited than those of their fellow male students, the case of Goncharova’s retrospective exhibition is remarkable. Technically, this was not Goncharova’s first exhibit, but this was the exhibition that established her reputation for many years to come. This article addresses several aspects of Gonacharova’s innovative work from the 1913 exhibition that saw a wide public resonance and opened new perspectives for Russian art of the period. In Front of the World: Self-Portrait At the beginning of her career, Goncharova made the following admission to Larionov: “I know very well that I am your creation and that without you nothing would have been.”5 There was some basis in these words. Larionov met Goncharova while still a student in the Sculpture Department of the Mos- cow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture (Moskovskoye uchilishche zhivopisi, vayaniya i zodchestva) in 1901–04. Larionov saw in his future part- ner the gift of a painter and convinced her to take up the medium: “You have eyes for color, but you are bothering with form. Realize what your eyes are actually capable of.”6 Goncharova switched to the Department of Painting and 3 Eli Eganburi [Ilya Zdanevich], Natalia Goncharova, Mikhail Larionov (Moscow: Munster, 1913). 4 Natalia Goncharova, Vistavka kartin Natalii Sergeevni Goncharovoy 1900–1913 (Natalia Ser- geevna Goncharova’s Picture Exhibition) (Moscow: Khudozhestvenny salon, 1913). 5 “…я oчeнь xopoшo знaю, чтo я твoe пpoизвeдeниe и чтo бeз тeбя ничeгo бы нe былo,” Natalia Goncharova, letter to Mikhail Larionov, May 17, 1946, in Mikhail Larionov—Natalia Goncharova: Shedevry iz parizhskogo nasledia. Zhivopis’. catalog vistavki (Mikhail Larionov— Natalia Goncharova: Masterpieces from Parisian Heritage. Paintings. Exhibition Catalogue) (Moscow: ra, 1999), 182. 6 “У Bac глaзa нa цвeт, a Bы зaняты фopмoй. Pacкpoйтe глaзa нa coбcтвeнныe глaзa,” Mikhail Larionov about 1901, in Tsvetaeva, “Natalia Goncharova. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo,” 49. Olga Furman - 9789004333147 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM via free access <UN> Natalia Goncharova 195 immediately found herself immersed in the art life of the capital. From their earliest steps together, they firmly established themselves as inventors of a new art.7 The sources of Goncharova’s stylistic development were common to many of the future avant-garde artists. In the art school, it was the workshop of Konstantin Korovin; outside, the contemporary Western art collections of Sergei Shchukin and Ivan Morozov. The great dream of the young artist was to take part in the exhibition of Zolotoe Runo [Golden Fleece], along with some of the modern French masters. “At the beginning of my work, I mostly learned from modern French artists,” Goncharova recalled.8 Her learning period lasted about five years, up to 1910; thereafter she and Larionov, among other artists, introduced the first Russian avant-garde movement: Neoprimitivism.9 Avtoportret s zholtymi liliyami (Self-portrait with Yellow Lilies, 1907–08, fig. 14.1) was shown in the 1913 exhibition and can be considered a manifest of Neoprimitivism. Instead of graceful proportions, her self-portrait depicts an unfeminine, heavy hand; instead of carefully shaped facial features, we see unadorned lines; instead of the noble oval form of the head, a stylized block. Goncharova has simplified the form in a Gauguin-like manner, giving herself the appearance of one of Gauguin’s Tahitian women. It is not immediately ap- parent that we are witnessing a deliberate act of destruction of the classical canons of beauty, enforced by the author’s presence. Portraiture in general is a particularly poignant genre of painting as it demonstrates the universal theme of cognitive activity: “the world and the individual,” and in the case of her so-called self-portrait: art and the artist. If we take the self-portrait in the classical tradition of an artist’s self-representation, then the appearance of the self-portrait in the artistic vocabulary of Goncharova may be more than surprising. She said: “I laugh at people who preach individuality and find value 7 Among these exhibitions were Stephanos (Moscow, 1907), Venok (Wreath, St. Petersburg, 1908), Zolotoe runo (Golden Fleece, Moscow, 1908, 1909, 1909–10), Salon Izdebskogo (Izdeb- sky’s Salon, Odessa, 1909, 1910–11), Natalia Goncharova’s personal exhibition (Moscow, 1910), Bubnovy Valet (Ace of Diamonds, Moscow, 1910–11), Osliny Khvost (Donkey’s Tail, Moscow, 1912), Mishen (Target, Moscow, 1913), etc. 8 “B нaчaлe мoeгo пути я бoлee вceгo училacь у coвpeмeнныx фpaнцузoв,” in Natalia Goncharova. Gody v Rossii (Natalia Goncharova. Years in Russia) (St. Petersburg: Palace Editions, 2002), 291. 9 The first exhibition paving the way for primitive art was Osliny khvost (Donkey’s Tail. Mos- cow, 1912). The term “neo-primitivism” appeared in the following brochure: Alexandr V. Shevchenko, Neoprimitivism: Ego teoria. Ego vozmozhnosti. Ego dostizhenia (Neoprimitivism: Its Theory. Its Possibilities. Its Achievements) (Moscow: Tipografia 1-y Moskovskoy Trudovoy Arteli 1913). Olga Furman - 9789004333147 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 12:27:30PM via free access <UN> 196 Furman Figure 14.1 Natalia Goncharova, Self-Portrait with Yellow Lilies, 1907–08, oil on canvas, 77.5 × 58.2 cm state tretyakov gallery, moscow, inv. 8965, © vg bild-kunst, bonn 2016 in one’s ‘self’.”10 Furthermore, Goncharova’s 1907–08 Self-Portrait with Yellow Lillies possessed an unprecedented occurrence. The famous self-portrait of Zinaida Serebryakova, Za tualetom (Making Her Toilet), was created a year later, in 1909, and in a totally different, classical “narcissistic” tradition. But the style of Goncharova’s self-portrait can be aligned with other future avant-garde male artists’ self-portraits: Kazimir Malevich (1908–09, fig. 14.2), Ivan Kliun (1909–10, fig. 14.3), etc.; in this we see an aspect of Goncharova’s sense of inno- vation at work, which changed and gave new meaning to the traditional genre of portrait-painting by adding to it a conceptual purpose. The genre of the self-portrait underwent substantial conceptual changes in the years leading up to the avant-garde era. Beginning with Symbolism, artists took new stances in relation to themselves and the world they were addressing. The space of the canvas became the space of the author’s declaration of artistic principles. Words and ideas began to force their way into the artists’ work, and although they were not visible in their paintings, one senses them boiling up from below and just beginning to surface visually in the 1910s. The individuality 10 “Mнe cмeшны люди, пpoпoвeдующиe индивидуaльнocть и пoлaгaющиe кaкую-тo цeннocть в cвoeм ‘я’,” in N.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Legacy Regained: Niko and the Russian Avant-Garde
    A LEGACY REGAINED: NIKO AND THE RUSSIAN AVANT-GARDE PALACE EDITIONS Contents 8 Foreword Evgeniia Petrova 9 Preface Job de Ruiter 10 Acknowledgements and Notes to the Reader John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny 13 Introduction John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny Part I. Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Russian Avant Garde Remembering Nikolai Khardzhiev 21 Nikolai Khardzhiev RudolfDuganov 24 The Future is Now! lra Vrubel-Golubkina 36 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Suprematists Nina Suetina 43 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Maiakovsky Museum, Moscow Gennadii Aigi 50 My Memoir of Nikolai Khardzhiev Vyacheslav Ivanov 53 Nikolai Khardzhiev and My Family Zoya Ender-Masetti 57 My Meetings with Nikolai Khardzhiev Galina Demosfenova 59 Nikolai Khardzhiev, Knight of the Avant-garde Jean-C1aude Marcade 63 A Sole Encounter Szymon Bojko 65 The Guardian of the Temple Andrei Nakov 69 A Prophet in the Wilderness John E. Bowlt 71 The Great Commentator, or Notes About the Mole of History Vasilii Rakitin Writings by Nikolai Khardzhiev Essays 75 Autobiography 76 Poetry and Painting:The Early Maiakovsky 81 Cubo-Futurism 83 Maiakovsky as Partisan 92 Painting and Poetry Profiles ofArtists and Writers 99 Elena Guro 101 Boris Ender 103 In Memory of Natalia Goncharova and Mikhail Larionov 109 Vladimir Maiakovsky 122 Velimir Khlebnikov 131 Alexei Kruchenykh 135 VladimirTatlin 137 Alexander Rodchenko 139 EI Lissitzky Contents Texts Edited and Annotated by Nikolai Khardzhiev 147 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introductions to Kazimir Malevich's Autobiography (Parts 1 and 2) 157 Kazimir Malevieh Autobiography 172 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Mikhail Matiushin's The Russian Cubo-Futurists 173 Mikhail Matiushin The Russian Cubo-Futurists 183 Alexei Morgunov A Memoir 186 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Khlebnikov Is Everywhere! 187 Khlebnikov is Everywhere! Memoirs by Oavid Burliuk, Nadezhda Udaltsova, Amfian Reshetov, and on Osip Mandelshtam 190 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Lev Zhegin's Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin 192 Lev Zhegin Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin Part 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Futurist Moment : Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture
    MARJORIE PERLOFF Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO AND LONDON FUTURIST Marjorie Perloff is professor of English and comparative literature at Stanford University. She is the author of many articles and books, including The Dance of the Intellect: Studies in the Poetry of the Pound Tradition and The Poetics of Indeterminacy: Rimbaud to Cage. Published with the assistance of the J. Paul Getty Trust Permission to quote from the following sources is gratefully acknowledged: Ezra Pound, Personae. Copyright 1926 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, Collected Early Poems. Copyright 1976 by the Trustees of the Ezra Pound Literary Property Trust. All rights reserved. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Copyright 1934, 1948, 1956 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Blaise Cendrars, Selected Writings. Copyright 1962, 1966 by Walter Albert. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1986 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 1986 Printed in the United States of America 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 54321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Perloff, Marjorie. The futurist moment. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Futurism. 2. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Title. NX600.F8P46 1986 700'. 94 86-3147 ISBN 0-226-65731-0 For DAVID ANTIN CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Abbreviations xiii Preface xvii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2
    MIT 4.602, Modern Art and Mass Culture (HASS-D) Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2 PHOTOGRAPHY, PROPAGANDA, MONTAGE: Soviet Avant-Garde “We are all primitives of the 20th century” – Ivan Kliun, 1916 UNOVIS members’ aims include the “study of the system of Suprematist projection and the designing of blueprints and plans in accordance with it; ruling off the earth’s expanse into squares, giving each energy cell its place in the overall scheme; organization and accommodation on the earth’s surface of all its intrinsic elements, charting those points and lines out of which the forms of Suprematism will ascend and slip into space.” — Ilya Chashnik , 1921 I. Making “Modern Man” A. Kasimir Malevich – Suprematism 1) Suprematism begins ca. 1913, influenced by Cubo-Futurism 2) Suprematism officially launched, 1915 – manifesto and exhibition titled “0.10 The Last Futurist Exhibition” in Petrograd. B. El (Elazar) Lissitzky 1) “Proun” as utopia 2) Types, and the new modern man C. Modern Woman? 1) Sonia Terk Delaunay in Paris a) “Orphism” or “organic Cubism” 1911 b) “Simultaneous” clothing, ceramics, textiles, cars 1913-20s 2) Natalia Goncharova, “Rayonism” 3) Lyubov Popova, Varvara Stepanova stage designs II. Monuments without Beards -- Vladimir Tatlin A. Constructivism (developed in parallel with Suprematism as sculptural variant) B. Productivism (the tweaking of “l’art pour l’art” to be more socialist) C. Monument to the Third International (Tatlin’s Tower), 1921 III. Collapse of the Avant-Garde? A. 1937 Paris Exposition, 1937 Entartete Kunst, 1939 Popular Front B.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Kazimir Malevich
    KAZIMIR MALEVICH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Achim Borchardt-Hume | 264 pages | 21 Apr 2015 | TATE PUBLISHING | 9781849761468 | English | London, United Kingdom Kazimir Malevich PDF Book From the beginning of the s, modern art was falling out of favor with the new government of Joseph Stalin. Red Cavalry Riding. Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students. The movement did have a handful of supporters amongst the Russian avant garde but it was dwarfed by its sibling constructivism whose manifesto harmonized better with the ideological sentiments of the revolutionary communist government during the early days of Soviet Union. What's more, as the writers and abstract pundits were occupied with what constituted writing, Malevich came to be interested by the quest for workmanship's barest basics. Black Square. Woman Torso. The painting's quality has degraded considerably since it was drawn. Guggenheim —an early and passionate collector of the Russian avant-garde—was inspired by the same aesthetic ideals and spiritual quest that exemplified Malevich's art. Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from May All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June Lyubov Popova - You might like Left Right. Harvard doctoral candidate Julia Bekman Chadaga writes: "In his later writings, Malevich defined the 'additional element' as the quality of any new visual environment bringing about a change in perception Retrieved 6 July A white cube decorated with a black square was placed on his tomb. It was one of the most radical improvements in dynamic workmanship. Landscape with a White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubo-Futurism
    Notes Cubo-Futurism Slap in theFace of Public Taste 1 . These two paragraphs are a caustic attack on the Symbolist movement in general, a frequent target of the Futurists, and on two of its representatives in particular: Konstantin Bal'mont (1867-1943), a poetwho enjoyed enormouspopu­ larityin Russia during thefirst decade of this century, was subsequentlyforgo tten, and died as an emigrein Paris;Valerii Briusov(18 73-1924), poetand scholar,leader of the Symbolist movement, editor of the Salles and literary editor of Russum Thought, who after the Revolution joined the Communist party and worked at Narkompros. 2. Leonid Andreev (1871-1919), a writer of short stories and a playwright, started in a realistic vein following Chekhov and Gorkii; later he displayed an interest in metaphysicsand a leaning toward Symbolism. He is at his bestin a few stories written in a realistic manner; his Symbolist works are pretentious and unconvincing. The use of the plural here implies that, in the Futurists' eyes, Andreev is just one of the numerousepigones. 3. Several disparate poets and prose writers are randomly assembled here, which stresses the radical positionof the signatories ofthis manifesto, who reject indiscriminately aU the literaturewritt en before them. The useof the plural, as in the previous paragraphs, is demeaning. Maksim Gorkii (pseud. of Aleksei Pesh­ kov, 1�1936), Aleksandr Kuprin (1870-1938), and Ivan Bunin (1870-1953) are writers of realist orientation, although there are substantial differences in their philosophical outlook, realistic style, and literary value. Bunin was the first Rus­ sianwriter to wina NobelPrize, in 1933.AJeksandr Biok (1880-1921)is possiblythe best, and certainlythe most popular, Symbolist poet.
    [Show full text]
  • Erhard Jägers & Patricia Railing, Report. a Suprematist Painting By
    Report. A Suprematist Painting by Ivan Kliun As a Suprematist painter, Ivan Kliun is known for clues, for his information linked into a number of factors the group of very spatial compositions in which about Kliun’s painting and, significantly, contributed valuable planes of colour hover in the white space of the canvas. new information about the artist’s creative practice and the Thin lines and small rectangles are placed so as to create history of Kliun’s investigations into colour. relationships of movement and expand the space visually in the four directions of the pictorial surface as well into its depth. Kliun must have shown several of these paintings in the The Pigments November 1916 Moscow exhibition, Knave of Diamonds. In this group there are oils and watercolours in museums In his scientific report, Dr. Jägers found several of the and private collections dated variously, 1915 and 1921, while pigments of Kliun’s standard palette, in this case, cadmium others are thought to date from the mid-1920s and there is yellow, Prussian blue, a mixed Prussian blue and yellow ochre, even one of 1930-2. This reveals a very particular aspect of brown ochres, umber, and iron oxide black. The ground was Kliun’s painting practice: he often went back to earlier stylies. painted in zinc white, and on the yellow, blue and grey planes The reason for this has so far not been explained or, it seems, he found touches of titanium white. even investigated. Now the presence of titanium white is usually not music to the ears of scientific experts or art historians because it has been supposed – based on very incomplete information – that 38 it is a pigment to be found no earlier than 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Dějiny Umění III. Příliš Dlouhé 19. Století
    Dějiny umění III. Příliš dlouhé 19. století: Umění ve věku revolucí, kapitálu a impérií Kurz představí dění na poli evropského a českého výtvarného umění a architektury v období od Velké francouzské revoluce do druhé světové války. Cílem výuky je studentům usnadnit kontextualizaci základních znalostí dějin umění jejich propojením s kulturně-historickými, sociologickými a dalšími souvislostmi. Prostřednictvím přednášek, diskusí a čtení vybraných dobových textů, budeme interpretovat umění dané doby a zároveň vnímat určité kontinuity a přesahy do současnosti, jako možnou inspiraci pro vlastní praxi. ZIMNÍ SEMESTR 1.Úvodní přednáška Představení způsobu výuky, metodologie a literatury. Diskuse o sylabu. Úvod do kulturně-historického dobového kontextu na pozadí vybraných dějinných události a vědecko-technologického vývoje. 2. Rozum, krása, umění a vznešeno Klasicismus / Neoklasicismus- estetické a etické principy osvícenství - racionalismus- humanismus-pokrok a dobové výtvarné umění a architektura. Znovuobjevení antiky- nový vztah k minulosti -Johann Joachim Winckelmann -výzkum Pompejí a Herculanea -Dějiny umění starověku a vznik archeologie. Giovanni Battista Piranesi a "Gout Grec". Anton Raphael Mengs, John Flaxman, Angelica Kauffman, Elisabeth- Louise Vigée Le Brun, Jean-Antoine Hudon... Velká francouzská revoluce - ozvěny v dobovém umění- proměny historické malby Jacques- Louis David, Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes, Jean-Baptiste Greuze, Jean-Auguste Dominique Ingres... Instituce umění na konci 18. a počátku 19. století –význam uměleckých akademií - založení Akademie v Praze Josef Bergler. Klasicismus- empír a evropské sochařství počátku 19. století - Antonio Canova, Bertel Thorvaldsen, Johann-Gottfried Schadow... Klasicistní koncepce v malířství přelomu 18. a 19. století v českých zemích- Ludvík Kohl, Karel Postl. Sochařství klasicismu a empíru v Čechách a na Moravě- kosmopolitismus a civilismus- Václav Prachner, Josef Malínský, František Xaver Lederer, Josef a Emanuel Max.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Judith Rothschild Foundation Gift
    Checklist of The Judith This checklist is a comprehensive ascertained through research. When a For books and journals, dimensions Inscriptions that are of particular his- record of The Judith Rothschild place of publication or the publisher given are for the largest page and, in torical or literary interest on individual Rothschild Foundation Gift Foundation gift to The Museum of was neither printed in the book nor cases where the page sizes vary by books are noted. Modern Art in 2001. The cataloguing identified through research, the des- more than 1/4,” they are designated Coordinated by Harper Montgomery system reflects museum practice in ignation “n.s” (not stated) is used. irregular (“irreg.”). For the Related The Credit line, Gift of The Judith under the direction of Deborah Wye. general and the priorities of The Similarly, an edition size is some- Material, single-sheet dimensions in Rothschild Foundation, pertains to all Museum of Modern Art’s Department times given as “unknown” if the print which the height or width varies from items on this checklist. To save space Researched and compiled by of Prints and Illustrated Books in par- run could not be verified. City names one end to the other by more than and avoid redundancy, this line does Jared Ash, Sienna Brown, Starr ticular. Unlike most bibliographies are given as they appear printed in 1/4” are similarly designated irregular. not appear in the individual entries. Figura, Raimond Livasgani, Harper and library catalogues, it focuses on each book; in different books the An additional credit may appear in Montgomery, Jennifer Roberts, artists rather than authors, and pays same city may be listed, for example, Medium descriptions (focusing on parentheses near the end of certain Carol Smith, Sarah Suzuki, and special attention to mediums that as Petersburg, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Kazimir Malevich And
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO KAZIMIR MALEVICH AND RUSSIAN MODERNISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ART HISTORY BY DANIEL KALMAN PHILLIPS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Daniel Kalman Phillips All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................. viii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................x INTRODUCTION MALEVICH, ART, AND HISTORY .......................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE MODERNISMS BEFORE SUPREMATISM........................................................18 CHAPTER TWO AN ARTIST OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY ...............................................71 CHAPTER THREE SUPREMATISM IN 1915 ...................................................................................120 CHAPTER FOUR CODA: SUPREMATISMS AFTER SUPREMATISM .......................................177 WORKS CITED................................................................................................. 211 iii LIST OF FIGURES1 0.1 Kazimir Malevich, Black Square, 1915. 0.2 Kazimir Malevich, [Airplane Flying], 1915. 0.3 John Baldessari, Violent Space Series: Two Stares Making a Point but Blocked by a Plane (for Malevich), 1976. 0.4 Yves Klein,
    [Show full text]
  • Shapiro Auctions
    Shapiro Auctions RUSSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL FINE ART & ANTIQUES Saturday - October 25, 2014 RUSSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL FINE ART & ANTIQUES 1: A RUSSIAN ICON OF HOLY MARTYR PARASKEVA WITH LIFE USD 30,000 - 40,000 A RUSSIAN ICON OF HOLY MARTYR PARASKEVA WITH LIFE SCENES, NORTHERN SCHOOL, LATE 16TH-EARLY 17TH CENTURY, the figure of Saint Paraskeva, venerated as the healer of the blind as well as the patron saint of trade and commerce, stands in a field of flowering plants, she holds her martyr`s cross in one hand and an open scroll in the other, a pair of angels places a crown upon her head, surrounding the central image are fourteen scenes from the saint`s life, including the many tortures she endured under Emperor Antoninus Pius and the Roman governor Tarasius. Egg tempera, gold leaf and gesso on wood panel with kovcheg. Two insert splints on the back, one missing, one-half of the other present. 103 x 80 cm (40 ½ x 31 1/2 in.)PROVENANCESotheby`s, New York, June 10-11, 1981, lot 541.Collection of Bernard Winters, Armonk, New York (acquired at the above auction)Bernard J. Winters was a philanthropist and art collector who was captivated by Russian icons. Over a fifty-year period, he worked closely with Sotheby`s, Christie`s, and private collectors to cultivate his collection. His monumental icons, as well as those purchased from Natalie Hays Hammond, daughter of John Hays Hammond, diplomat, were some of his favored items. 2: A RUSSIAN ICON OF THE VENERABLE SERGIUS OF RADONEZH, USD 10,000 - 15,000 A RUSSIAN ICON OF THE VENERABLE SERGIUS OF RADONEZH, YAROSLAVL SCHOOL, CIRCA 1600, the saint depicted holding a scroll featuring an excerpt from his last words to his disciples, "Do not be sad Brothers, but rather preserve the purity of your bodies and souls, and love in a disinterested manner," above him is an image of the Holy Trinity - a reference to his Monastery of the Holy Trinity, as well as to the icon painted by Andrei Rublev under Sergius` successor, on a deep green background with a red border.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museums of Artistic Culture – a Policy of Disseminating Modern Art
    SVETLANA DZHAFAROVA The Museums of Artistic Culture – A Policy of Disseminating Modern Art Svetlana Dzhafarova is an art historian and since 1997 is scientific researcher in the Russian Institute for Cultural Research under the Ministry of Culture, Moscow. Her article was first published in L’Avant-garde russe – Chefs-d’oeuvre des Musées de Russie 1905-1925, Museée des Beaux-Arts de Nantes, 30 janvier-18 avril, 1993. This article is based on archival documents, some of which appear on www.incorm.org/museum. They are indicated in-text by Document number. ([KLELWLRQVRIDYDQWJDUGH5XVVLDQDUWRUJDQLVHGDW WKHEULHIDSRJHHRIWKHDYDQWJDUGHEXWLWDOVRFUHDWHGWKHLOOXVLRQ RXU SURYLQFLDO PXVHXPV KDYH QRZ EHFRPH ERWK WKDW WKH VDPH DYDQWJDUGH ZDV DFFHSWHG DQG LQFOXGHG LQ D 14 FRPPRQ DQG LQWHUQDWLRQDOO\ NQRZQ %XW WKH\ DOZD\V PDNH VRFLHW\IRUZKLFKWRIHHOPRGHUQ±DQLOOXVLRQRIDUWLVWLFYDOXHV SHRSOH ZRQGHU ³KRZ LV LW WKDW VXFK LPSRUWDQW ZRUNV KDYH FRQFHLYHG IRU DQ HOLWH REMHFWLYHO\ FRPSOH[ DQG LPSHQHWUDEOH EHFRPHWKHSURSHUW\RIPXVHXPVVRIDUIURPWKHWZRSULQFLSDO ZLWKRXWYLVXDOWUDLQLQJ±VKRXOGTXLFNO\EHFRPHDFFHVVLEOHWR FHQWUHVRIDUW±0RVFRZDQG6W3HWHUVEXUJ"´ ³WKHPDVWHUVRIWKHHDUWK´WKHPDVVHV 2XU NQRZOHGJH RI WKH QHZ WUHQGV RI 5XVVLDQ DUW RI WKH :LWK WKH 2FWREHU 5HYROXWLRQ WKH SULYDWH EX\HU ¿UVWDQGVHFRQGGHFDGHVRIWKHthFHQWXU\LVQRZVXI¿FLHQWO\ FROOHFWRU GLVDSSHDUHG DOWKRXJK LQ FHUWDLQ LVRODWHG FDVHV WKLV GHWDLOHG IRU XV WR EH DEOH WR SURYLGH DQ KLVWRULFDOO\ EDODQFHG UROHKDGEHHQSOD\HGE\WKH³OHIWLVW´FROOHFWRUVVXFKDV6HUJHL DQVZHUWRWKLVTXHVWLRQ 6KFKXNLQ ,YDQ 0RUR]RY ,VVDGLDQRY /DELQVNDwD
    [Show full text]
  • Chagall Malevich
    CHAGALL TO MALEVICH THE RUSSIAN AVANTGARDES Contents Exhibition facts Press release Wall texts Exhibition facts Press conference 25 February 2016 | 10 am Opening 25 February 2016 | 6.30 pm Duration 26 February to 26 June 2016 Venue Kahn Galleries Curator Prof Dr Klaus Albrecht Schröder and Dr Evgenia Petrova Exhibits 130 Catalogue The catalogue is available for EUR 34 in the Albertina’s museum shop and at www.albertina.at Contact Albertinaplatz 1 | A-1010 Vienna T +43 (0)1 534 83 –0 [email protected] | www.albertina.at Opening hours Daily 10 am – 6 pm, Wednesdays 10 am – 9 pm Press contact Sarah Wulbrandt T +43 (01) 534 83 - 511 | M +43 (0)699.12178720 [email protected] Barbara Walcher T +43 (01) 534 83 – 512 | M +43 (0)699.109 81743 [email protected] Ivana Novoselac-Binder T +43 (01) 534 83 - 514 | M +43 (0)699.12178741 [email protected] Sponsors Partner Mediapartner Chagall to Malevich The Russian Avant-Gardes 26 February to 26 June 2016 The art of the Russian avant-garde numbers among the most diverse and radical chapters of modernism. At no other point in the history of art did artistic schools and artists’ associations emerge at such a breathtaking pace than between 1910 and 1920. Every group was its own programme, every programme its own call to battle – against the past as well as against competing iterations of the present. The Albertina is devoting a major presentation to the diverse range of art from that era: 130 masterpieces by Mikhail Larionov, Natalia Goncharova, Kazimir Malevich, Wassily Kandinsky, and Marc Chagall illustrate fundamentally different styles and their dynamic development from primitivism to cubo-futurism and on to suprematism, as well the chronological parallels between figurative expressionism and pure abstraction.
    [Show full text]