Cytospora Canker
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cytospora Canker
report on RPD No. 604 PLANT April 1996 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN CYTOSPORA OR LEUCOSTOMA CANKER OF SPRUCE Cytospora or Leucostoma canker, the most common and damaging disease of spruce, is caused by the fungus Leucocytospora kunzei, synonym Cytospora kunzei (teleomorph or sexual state Leucostoma kunzei, synonym Valsa kunzei). This canker occurs on several conifers from New England to the western United States. Colo- rado or Colorado blue (Picea pungens) and Norway spruce (Picea abies), used for ornament and in wind- breaks, are the species most commonly affected in Illinois. The disease has reached epidemic proportions on Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) and Douglas- fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in the eastern Rocky Mountains due to a succession of dry years in the area. Other trees reported as susceptible to the disease are given in Table 1. Spruce trees less than 10 to 15 years old usually do not have Cytospora canker. In landscape nurseries, how- ever, small branches of young Colorado blue and oc- casionally white spruces may be killed. Three varieties of Leucostoma kunzei are recognized by some spec- ialists: var. piceae on spruces, var. superficialis on pines, and var. kunzei on other conifers. Figure 1. Colorado spruce affected by Cytospora Dead and dying branches call attention to Cytospora or canker. Leucostoma canker with older branches more suscep- tible than young ones. The fungus kills areas of bark, usually at the bases of small twigs and branches, creating elliptical to diamond-shaped lesions. If the lesions enlarge faster than the stem and girdle it, the portion beyond the canker also dies. -
What Makes a Tree
Trees 101 Structure, Function, Identification, Jargon Pam Zipse Outreach Coordinator, Rutgers Urban Forestry Program of NJAES urbanforestry.rutgers.edu NJ Licensed Tree Expert # 426 NJ Certified Teacher of Biological Science # 863775 Defining a Tree What is a Tree? • A woody perennial plant, typically having a single stem or trunk growing to a considerable height and bearing lateral branches at some distance from the ground. What is a Tree? • A large water pump facilitating moisture exchange for energy conversion and food production. Photosynthesis Photosynthesis • For a tree to be healthy, it must be able to carry out photosynthesis. • Carbon Dioxide + Water in the presence of light , yields Sugar + Oxygen LIGHT CO₂ + H₂O → C₆H₁₂O₆ + O₂ Photosynthesis • So what does a tree need to be able to successfully carry out photosynthesis? • Carbon Dioxide (Air) • Water • Light Photosynthesis • Anything that inhibits a tree’s ability to carry out photosynthesis… • Anything that prevents a tree from pumping water and cycling air… • is going to harm the tree! Forestry is Common Sense Elevated to a Science Structure and Function… Beginners Guide to Tree Anatomy and Physiology Anatomy & Physiology (Structure & Function) • Tree Anatomy deals with the structure of trees. – What are the parts of a tree? • Tree Physiology deals with the functions and activities of these parts. – How does a tree grow? How does a tree grow? How does a tree grow? • Trees grow from the outside out and from the top up. How does a tree grow? • The cambium is the living layer of actively dividing cells located just inside the bark that produces a new growth ring each year. -
Pathogenicity and Distribution of Two Species of Cytospora on Populus Tremuloides in Portions of the Rocky Mountains and Midwest in the United T States ⁎ M.M
Forest Ecology and Management 468 (2020) 118168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Pathogenicity and distribution of two species of Cytospora on Populus tremuloides in portions of the Rocky Mountains and midwest in the United T States ⁎ M.M. Dudleya, , N.A. Tisseratb, W.R. Jacobib, J. Negrónc, J.E. Stewartd a Biology Department, Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, United States b Department of Agricultural Biology (Emeritus), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States c USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, United States d Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States ABSTRACT Historically, Cytospora canker of quaking aspen was thought to be caused primarily by Cytospora chrysosperma. However, a new and widely distributed Cytospora species on quaking aspen was recently described (Cytospora notastroma Kepley & F.B. Reeves). Here, we show the relative pathogenicity, abundance, and frequency of both species on quaking aspen in portions of the Rocky Mountain region, and constructed species-level phylogenies to examine possible hybridization among species. We inoculated small-diameter aspen trees with one or two isolates each of C. chrysosperma and C. notastroma in a greenhouse and in environmental growth chambers. Results indicate that both Cytospora species are pathogenic to drought-stressed aspen, and that C. chrysosperma is more aggressive (i.e., caused larger cankers) than C. notastroma, particularly at cool temperatures. Neither species cause significant canker growth on trees that were not drought-stressed. Both C. chrysosperma and C. notastroma are common on quaking aspen, in addition to a third, previously described species, Cytospora nivea. -
DNA Barcoding of Fungi in the Forest Ecosystem of the Psunj and Papukissn Mountains 1847-6481 in Croatia Eissn 1849-0891
DNA Barcoding of Fungi in the Forest Ecosystem of the Psunj and PapukISSN Mountains 1847-6481 in Croatia eISSN 1849-0891 OrIGINAL SCIENtIFIC PAPEr DOI: https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.20-17 DNA barcoding of Fungi in the Forest Ecosystem of the Psunj and Papuk Mountains in Croatia Nevenka Ćelepirović1,*, Sanja Novak Agbaba2, Monika Karija Vlahović3 (1) Croatian Forest Research Institute, Division of Genetics, Forest Tree Breeding and Citation: Ćelepirović N, Novak Agbaba S, Seed Science, Cvjetno naselje 41, HR-10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia; (2) Croatian Forest Karija Vlahović M, 2020. DNA Barcoding Research Institute, Division of Forest Protection and Game Management, Cvjetno naselje of Fungi in the Forest Ecosystem of the 41, HR-10450 Jastrebarsko; (3) University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Department of Psunj and Papuk Mountains in Croatia. forensic medicine and criminology, DNA Laboratory, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia. South-east Eur for 11(2): early view. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.20-17. * Correspondence: e-mail: [email protected] received: 21 Jul 2020; revised: 10 Nov 2020; Accepted: 18 Nov 2020; Published online: 7 Dec 2020 AbStract The saprotrophic, endophytic, and parasitic fungi were detected from the samples collected in the forest of the management unit East Psunj and Papuk Nature Park in Croatia. The disease symptoms, the morphology of fruiting bodies and fungal culture, and DNA barcoding were combined for determining the fungi at the genus or species level. DNA barcoding is a standardized and automated identification of species based on recognition of highly variable DNA sequences. DNA barcoding has a wide application in the diagnostic purpose of fungi in biological specimens. -
Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here. -
Tree Identification ISA Certified Arborist
Panelists: (comprised of urban foresters and certified arborists) • John Warner, Texas A&M Forest Service, Facilitator • Jordy Herrin, Texas A&M Forest Service, Chat box monitor • Mark Kroeze, Texas A&M Forest Service • Jack Hill, Burditt Consultants, LLC • Michael Gabrielse, Burditt Consultants, LLC What we will cover today in All About Trees Tree Pruning: Why prune, pruning types, pruning guidelines, wound wood, codominant stems, bad pruning habits, physiological characteristics of trees Tree Planting: Proper planting, when to plant, planting stock Tree Facts & Quiz Tree Root Architecture Small absorbing roots Lateral roots Sinker roots Taproot = Topping a tree is considered a healthy way of pruning. True or False? False! Topping, de- horning, hat-racking or what ever you want to call it is NOT recognized by any of the professional arboriculture organizations, urban forestry professionals or certified arborists as an approved method of pruning. Pruning Trees Proper pruning helps keep plants’ attractive and vigorous and will add years to the plant’s health. Many people are apprehensive about pruning, but knowing how, when and why to prune will end these fears. Basic Pruning Questions May include but are not limited to: – Three D’s – Dead, Dying or Diseased – Improve Tree Structure & Form – Crowded – Reducing risk – Potential hazards – Improving aesthetics – Satisfying a specific need Basic Pruning Guidelines •Prune first for safety, next for health, and finally for aesthetics. •Never prune trees that are touching or near utility lines; instead consult your local utility company. •Always have a reason for pruning •TREES DO NOT HEAL THEY SEAL Basic Pruning Guidelines • Remove broken or hanging limbs immediately before they fall. -
Tree Pruning: the Basics! Pruning Objectives!
1/12/15! Tree Pruning: The Basics! Pruning Objectives! Improve Plant Health! Safety! Aesthetics! Bess Bronstein! [email protected] Direct Growth! Pruning Trees Increase Flowers & Fruit! Remember-! Leaf, Bud & Branch Arrangement! ! Plants have a genetically predetermined size. Pruning cant solve all problems. So, plant the right plant in the right way in the right place.! Pruning Trees Pruning Trees 1! 1/12/15! One year old MADCap Horse, Ole!! Stem & Buds! Two years old Three years old Internode Maple! Ash! Horsechestnut! Dogwood! Oleaceae! Node Caprifoliaceae! Most plants found in these genera and families have opposite leaf, bud and branch arrangement.! Pruning Trees Pruning Trees One year old Node & Internode! Stem & Buds! Two years old Three years old Internode Node! • Buds, leaves and branches arise here! Bud scale scars - indicates yearly growth Internode! and tree vigor! • Stem area between Node nodes! Pruning Trees Pruning Trees 2! 1/12/15! One year old Stem & Buds! Two years old Dormant Buds! Three years old Internode Bud scale scars - indicates yearly growth and tree vigor! Node Latent bud - inactive lateral buds at nodes! Latent! Adventitious" Adventitious bud! - found in unexpected areas (roots, stems)! Pruning Trees Pruning Trees One year old Epicormic Growth! Stem & Buds! Two years old Three years old Growth from dormant buds, either latent or adventitious. Internode These branches are weakly attached.! Axillary (lateral) bud - found along branches below tips! Bud scale scars - indicates yearly growth and tree vigor! Node -
Pruning Cuts
Colorado Master Gardenersm Program Colorado Gardener Certificate Training Colorado State University Extension GardenNotes #613 Pruning Cuts Fact sheet outline: Size of branch to remove, page 1 Thinning cuts, page 2 Reduction cuts, page 4 Heading cuts, page 6 Three cut method, page 6 Wound dressing, page 7 Time of year to prune, page 7 Amount of wood to remove, page 8 Hiring a qualified tree pruning professional, page 9 Additional information, page 9 A pruning cut may or may not predispose the tree to internal decay and stress depending on the type of cut used, technical precision of the cut, size of the branch removed, species, and general health of the tree. For details on tree growth and decay, refer to CMG GardenNotes #611, Tree Growth and Decay. In pruning, there are three primary types of pruning cuts, thinning cuts, reduction cuts, and heading cuts, each giving different results in growth and appearance. Note: In this publication the term “trunk” refers to the trunk or parent branch and “side branch” refers to the adjacent side branch arising from the trunk (parent branch). The same relationship exists between a side branch and secondary side branch. Size of Branch to Remove Ideally, all pruning cuts are two inches in diameter and smaller. Woundwood (the callus tissue that grows over pruning cuts or wounds) quickly grows over these small pruning cuts. Any cut on a branch larger than 4-inch diameter should be justified, taking into account the potential for decay. 613-1 Thinning Cuts Thinning cuts (also known as removal cuts, collar cuts or natural target pruning cuts) remove a side branch back to the larger parent branch or trunk. -
AREA Quarterly Newsletter-Spring/Summer 2012
AREA Quarterly E-newsletter Spring/Summer 2012 President’s Message AREA President’s Message ........... 1 Dear AREA Members: I’m encouraging you to attend the 88th Annual ISA Conference in AREA Candidate Biographies......... 2 Portland, Oregon, August 11-15, 2012. Sustainability is the focus of the Tree Risk Assessment: conference and the theme is “Trees: A Global Necessity.” The concept Biomechanics of Stability, Strength of sustainability pertains to and is more directly relevant for human and Structure .................................. 4 beings, since all of the services that humans need to survive are derived Urban Tree Growth and Longevity from, and are dependent upon, the long-term viability and sustainability Group.............................................. 4 of ecosystems. Sustainable urban forests require healthy vegetation, community- 2012 AREA Session ....................... 5 wide support, and comprehensive management. The goal of a sustain- 2012 AREA Student Travel Grant able urban forest is to maintain a maximum level of net environmental, Recipients ....................................... 8 ecological, social, and economic benefits over time. Therefore, the TREE Fund Updates .................... 10 Arboricultural Research and Education Academy (AREA) will be coor- Professional Opportunities ............11 dinating an educational program on Wednesday August 15, 2012 (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 pm) to support efforts of faculty, students, and researchers working in arboriculture and urban forestry through physical, biologi- cal, ecological and the sociological sciences. Variety of topics will be covered through oral presentations, such as tree monitoring, urban soil rehabilitation, trees and storm water mitigation, improving drought stressed trees, tree biomechanics, crown and root pruning, tree physiol- ogy, trees and wind resistance, crown safety and aerial tree inspection, elevated CO2 and urban trees, natural resource planning and manage- ment. -
Mistletoes of North American Conifers
United States Department of Agriculture Mistletoes of North Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station American Conifers General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-98 September 2002 Canadian Forest Service Department of Natural Resources Canada Sanidad Forestal SEMARNAT Mexico Abstract _________________________________________________________ Geils, Brian W.; Cibrián Tovar, Jose; Moody, Benjamin, tech. coords. 2002. Mistletoes of North American Conifers. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS–GTR–98. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 123 p. Mistletoes of the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae are the most important vascular plant parasites of conifers in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Species of the genera Psittacanthus, Phoradendron, and Arceuthobium cause the greatest economic and ecological impacts. These shrubby, aerial parasites produce either showy or cryptic flowers; they are dispersed by birds or explosive fruits. Mistletoes are obligate parasites, dependent on their host for water, nutrients, and some or most of their carbohydrates. Pathogenic effects on the host include deformation of the infected stem, growth loss, increased susceptibility to other disease agents or insects, and reduced longevity. The presence of mistletoe plants, and the brooms and tree mortality caused by them, have significant ecological and economic effects in heavily infested forest stands and recreation areas. These effects may be either beneficial or detrimental depending on management objectives. Assessment concepts and procedures are available. Biological, chemical, and cultural control methods exist and are being developed to better manage mistletoe populations for resource protection and production. Keywords: leafy mistletoe, true mistletoe, dwarf mistletoe, forest pathology, life history, silviculture, forest management Technical Coordinators_______________________________ Brian W. Geils is a Research Plant Pathologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, AZ. -
Cytospora Canker Fact Sheet No
Cytospora Canker Fact Sheet No. 2.937 Gardening Series|Diseases by W.R. Jacobi* Cytospora canker is caused by various Symptoms Quick Facts species of the fungus Cytospora (sexual Cytospora species cause branch dieback • Cytospora canker is caused genera of Valsa and Leucostoma). These and cankers on trees or shrubs. Cankers by several species of pathogens affect many species of shrubs on stems and branches are often elongate, and trees in Colorado, including aspen, slightly sunken, discolored areas in the bark. Cytospora (sexual form Valsa cottonwood, lombardy and other poplars, Many times, however, the discoloration is and Leucostoma) fungi. The apple, cherry, peach, plum, birch, willow, not evident because the fungus killed the name comes from the asexual honeylocust, mountain ash, silver maple, bark rapidly. The fungus grows so fast on stage of the pathogen that is spruce, and Siberian elm. Some Cytospora more commonly seen. species are host-specific while other species can infect several different tree species. For • The disease occurs on example, willow, cottonwoods, and aspen woody shrubs and trees are susceptible to one species. The fungus or parts of plants that are attacks trees or parts of trees that are injured slightly stressed. or in a weak or stressed condition. The fungus grows in the living bark (phloem) • Many trees and shrubs are and wood (xylem) and kills by girdling the affected by this disease branch or tree. The fungus can attack tree (apple, ash, aspen, birch, bark during the fall-winter spring seasons cottonwood, elm, maple, when temperatures are warm but the tree peach, spruce, willow). -
Multigene Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Cytospora Spiraeae Sp
Phytotaxa 338 (1): 049–062 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.4 Multigene phylogeny and morphology reveal Cytospora spiraeae sp. nov. (Diaporthales, Ascomycota) in China HAI-YAN ZHU1, CHENG-MING TIAN1 & XIN-LEI FAN1* 1 The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; * Correspondence author: [email protected] Abstract Members of Cytospora encompass important plant-associated pathogens, endophytes and saprobes, commonly isolated from a wide range of hosts with a worldwide distribution. Two specimens were collected associated with symptomatic canker and dieback disease of Spiraea salicifolia in Gansu, China. These isolates are characterized by its hyaline, biseriate, aseptate, elongate-allantoid ascospores and allantoid conidia. Cytospora spiraeae sp. nov. is introduced based on its holomorphic morphology plus support from phylogenetic analysis (ITS, LSU, ACT and RPB2), and differs from similar species in its host association. Key words: Cytosporaceae, plant pathogen, systematics, taxonomy, Valsa Introduction The genus Cytospora (Ascomycota: Diaporthales) was established by Ehrenberg (1818). It is commonly famous as the important phytopathogens that cause dieback and canker disease on a wide range of plants, causing severe commercial and ecological damage and significant losses worldwide (Adams et al. 2005, 2006). Previous Cytospora species and related sexual genera Leucostoma, Valsa, Valsella, and Valseutypella were listed by old fungal literatures without any living culture and sufficient evidence to identify (Fries 1823; Saccardo 1884; Kobayashi 1970; Barr 1978; Gvritishvili 1982; Spielman 1983, 1985).