Task Jitter Measurement Under Rtlinux and RTX Operating Systems, Comparison of Rtlinux and RTX Operating Environments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Task Jitter Measurement Under Rtlinux and RTX Operating Systems, Comparison of Rtlinux and RTX Operating Environments Proceedings of the International Multiconference on ISBN 978-83-60810-14-9 Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 703 – 709 ISSN 1896-7094 Task jitter measurement under RTLinux and RTX operating systems, comparison of RTLinux and RTX operating environments Pavel Moryc Jindřich Černohorský Technical University of Ostrava Technical University of Ostrava Faculty of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Computer Science Department of Measurement and Department of Measurement and Control Control Centre for Applied Cybernetics Centre for Applied Cybernetics Ostrava, Czech Republic Ostrava, Czech Republic Email: Email: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract — This paper compares task jitter measurement the possibility to realize such system on one computer only. performed under RTLinux and RTX hard real-time operating Computer system of this scope is standardized in the POSIX systems. Both the operating environments represent Hardware 1003.13 standard, as the PSE 54 profile (multipurpose sys- Abstraction Layer extensions to general-purpose operating systems, and make possible to create a real-time system tem). PSE 54 - sized solutions are often preferred for their according to the POSIX 1003.13 PSE 54 profile (multipurpose challenging possibility to use a broad range of standardized system). The paper is focused on discussion of experimental and low-cost hardware components, primarily intended for results, obtained on PC hardware, and their interpretation. general-purpose computers, but on the other hand, they can involve lack of predictability typical for general-purpose I. INTRODUCTION: APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL-PURPOSE OPERATING (non real-time) systems. SYSTEMS IN CONTROL SYSTEMS Traditional general-purpose kernel provides full range of EAL-TIME task is a task, which meets prescribed dead- API services specified in the POSIX 1003.1 standard, and Rline. Control system is a computer system, which physi- because of that, it cannot guarantee appropriately determinis- cally realizes real-time tasks. The physical realization of the tic behavior, required in most real-time and technology con- real-time task is not ideal, but it shows latencies and jitters. trol applications. Basic approaches to make such architecture Operating system and hardware support the real-time tasks more real-time one include with standardized means, which have non-zero and variable • low-latency kernel, overhead. Kernel latency is defined as a delay between • preemptible kernel, scheduled and actual execution of a task (e.g. between • hardware abstraction layer (HAL). scheduled and actual instance starting time) [5]. The kernel Low-latency kernel represents a traditional approach. The latency is not stable, but it shows a jitter. Jitter is defined as a low-latency kernel is monolithic (i.e. it cannot be preempted variable deviation from ideal timing event. The causes of jit- by task), but its design minimizes latencies and jitters of the ter encompass code branching into paths with different exe- kernel API services typically used in real-time applications. cution times, variable delays implied whenever variable Preemptible kernel can be preempted by task. Preemptiv- amount of code or data is stored in or read from caches and ity by task means, that a task can preempt the kernel just ser- buffers, as well as noise and electromagnetic interference. vicing another task, and enter the kernel instead. This type of The substance of jitter can be seen in a need for parallel premptivity is called reentrancy. However, at least some processing, which in turn stems from inevitable conflict be- parts of a kernel (scheduling, interrupt service mechanism) tween predictability and unpredictability. The control system cannot be made reentrant. Moreover, the idea of a pre- has to be predictable and deterministic as much as possible. emptible kernel itself does not imply, that the kernel is deter- Control systems are intended to communicate with technol- ministically preemptible, i.e. its jitters are acceptably stable. ogy, as well as with people managing the technology (at least Last but not least, hardware abstraction layers can be ap- an emergency stop pushbutton is provided). Seen from this plied. A hardware abstraction layer receives timer interrupt viewpoint, control system shall be appropriately flexible. As and sends a virtual (software) interrupt to the general-pur- the result, a control system design represents a compromise pose operating system kernel, thus providing a virtual between stability and adaptability. (slower) clock for the general-purpose operating system. It is possible to design a control system on two computers, This can be seen as a cycle stealing. In the free time, real- one designed to meet technology demands, and the other de- time tasks can be run. Obviously, latencies and jitters of the signed to meet the user interface demands, but there is also HAL layer must be kept low enough by design. 978-83-60810-14-9/08/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE 703 704 PROCEEDINGS OF THE IMCSIT. VOLUME 3, 2008 II. RTLINUX AND RTX BASICS Due to the communication interface, subset of Windows Both the RTLinux and RTX represent real-time Hardware API services is callable from within a RTSS thread. It in- Abstraction Layers. RTLinux is the product of the FSMLabs, cludes APIs for storing data to file, thus real-time pipes are Inc., designed for the Linux operating environment, while not available in the API services set. However, we can rea- RTX is the product of the Citrix Systems Inc. (Ardence), and sonably suppose, that similar IPC mechanisms are necessary is designed to run under the Windows operating system. to provide similar functionality, no matter whether they are hidden for the programmer. Some of Windows APIs avail- A. RTLinux able from RTSS threads are listed as non-deterministic, i.e. RTLinux microkernel (fig. 1a) implements a Hardware they can cause significant jitter when called from a RTSS Abstraction Layer inserted between hardware and Linux ker- thread. High-speed (and high resolution) clocks are needed nel. Both the RTLinux microkernel and the Linux kernel for real-time precise timer realization. Within a RTSS have to communicate mutually, thus it is necessary to make thread, time is measured with 100 ns step and resolution. certain modifications into the Linux kernel. The modifica- Shutdown handler is a mechanism delivering more robust- tions include ness to the real-time RTSS subsystem when the Windows • modification of macros for disabling and en- subsystem is crashed or regularly shut down. abling interrupts in order to use internal HAL It can be summarized, that following differences from signals (software interrupts) instead of using cli RTLinux exist: and sti assembler instructions, • no real-time pipes or their equivalents are avail- • modification of interrupt handlers, in order to use able in the API service set, signals instead of direct Interrupt Controller ac- • it is possible to call a subset of Windows API cess, services directly from the RTX (RTSS) real-time • modification of device drivers in order to prevent task, them from using sti/cli assembler instructions di- • time is measured with 100 ns resolution, rectly as well. • interrupts to the Windows kernel are masked Within a RTLinux thread, time is measured with resolu- while the RTX (RTSS) real-time task runs, tion that depends on hardware. On the Pentium 4 platform, • a real-time interrupt routine has two mandatory the time resolution is equal to 32 ns. parts, which can be used as upper and bottom [1] and [4] discuss the overall architecture more deeply. ISR part, Basic resources used for interprocess synchronization and • IPC communication in the RTLinux/Linux environment are it is possible to implement a shutdown handler as semaphores, mutexes, shared memory pools, and real-time the last resort resource. data pipes, which are more complex structures combining buffers and mutexes. Moreover, many A/D cards are con- III. APPLIED MEASUREMENT METHOD trolled by direct access to registers, thus direct I/O access is The measurement method applied is described in [3] and an important feature. more deeply in [4]. Based on RTLinux resource analysis, following important RTLinux characteristics have been iden- B. RTX tified: RTX microkernel is similar to RTLinux kernel in func- • precision of scheduler (measured as task starting tionality, but different in realization (fig. 1b). It supports time jitter), real-time tasks, which are called RTSS threads. The Win- • dows kernel is a proprietary solution, and its source code is interrupt latency time, • not freely available to the public. Fortunately, two possible execution time of typically used API services, access paths to its modification exist. The first customizable e.g. part is the Windows HAL, and the second one is a device . pipe write and read operations, driver [2]. Basically, it is necessary to modify the Windows . shared memory write and read operations, HAL for three purposes: . thread switching time • to add interrupt isolation between Windows ker- • I/O port read and write access time. nel and RTSS threads, The I/O access is also included, because it characterizes • to implement high-speed clocks and timers, hardware, and presents the basic method of communication with both sensors and actuators. • to implement shutdown handlers. A generalized application has been written, which uses the The two interconnection points between Windows kernel above-mentioned RTLinux key resources. The application is and RTX microkernel mentioned above make possible to re- called RT-golem, and its design is described in [3] and [4]. alize connection between RTX microkernel and Windows As RTLinux and RTX operating environments are func- kernel, providing the same functionality as the interface be- tionally similar and their key resources are merely the same, tween RTLinux microkernel and the Linux kernel (fig. 1b), it can be supposed, that similar design can be used for jitter [2, fig. 1]. The communication interface between Windows measurement under the RTX operating environment too.
Recommended publications
  • Citrix Historical Retrospective 1989-2010 2010 • Citrix Xendesktop Feature Pack 1 Released • Citrix Xendesktop 4 Honored A
    Citrix Historical Retrospective 1989-2010 2010 • Citrix XenDesktop Feature Pack 1 released • Citrix XenDesktop 4 honored as an InfoWorld 2010 Technology of the Year Award winner • Joint collaboration agreement with Microsoft to accelerate virtual desktop adoption. • First public release of Citrix XenClient, a new client-side virtualization solution, developed in collaboration with Intel • New Citrix HDX™ “Nitro” technologies, which include groundbreaking innovations at all levels of the desktop virtualization infrastructure, introduced • Citrix XenDesktop® 4 won the “Best of Interop” 2010 award for leading innovation in virtualization • Citrix NetScaler “burst pack” licenses, which extend the flexible pay-as-you-grow model by scaling data center capacity during traffic spikes, introduced • Citrix XenServer 5.6, with powerful new features for the free and paid editions, becomes available • Citrix Receiver and Citrix GoToMeeting become available as apps in the Apple iPad App Store • Citrix XenDesktop including Citrix XenClient and Citrix XenVault are introduced, making it easier for IT to incorporate mobile laptop users into a unified enterprise desktop virtualization strategy • Citrix and Cisco partner to provide the new Cisco Desktop Virtualization Solution • Citrix and Microsoft introduced V-Alliance, an expanded global partnership with Microsoft that gives Citrix and Microsoft partners access to special sales and marketing tools • Citrix acquired VMLogix, a leading provider of virtualization management for private and public clouds • Announces HD Faces – integrated video – in its GoToMeeting web collaboration offering • Citrix GoToTraining, an easy online training tool that allows you to deliver interactive online training sessions to anyone, anywhere, at any time is introduced • Citrix enhanced its Citrix OpenCloud™ infrastructure platform that extend the company’s leadership position as the most widely deployed provider of virtualization and networking solutions for the open cloud.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Troubleshooting Citrix Xendesktop®
    [ 1 ] www.allitebooks.com Troubleshooting Citrix XenDesktop® The ultimate troubleshooting guide for clear, concise, and real-world solutions to a wide range of common Citrix XenDesktop® problems Gurpinder Singh BIRMINGHAM - MUMBAI www.allitebooks.com Troubleshooting Citrix XenDesktop® Copyright © 2015 Packt Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles or reviews. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this book to ensure the accuracy of the information presented. However, the information contained in this book is sold without warranty, either express or implied. Neither the author, nor Packt Publishing, and its dealers and distributors will be held liable for any damages caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by this book. Packt Publishing has endeavored to provide trademark information about all of the companies and products mentioned in this book by the appropriate use of capitals. However, Packt Publishing cannot guarantee the accuracy of this information. First published: October 2015 Production reference: 1201015 Published by Packt Publishing Ltd. Livery Place 35 Livery Street Birmingham B3 2PB, UK. ISBN 978-1-78528-013-9 www.packtpub.com www.allitebooks.com Notice The statements made and opinions expressed herein belong exclusively to the author and reviewers of this publication, and are not shared by or represent the viewpoint of Citrix Systems®, Inc. This publication does not constitute an endorsement of any product, service, or point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • A Secure Sharing and Migration Approach for Live Virtual Desktop Applications in a Cloud Environment Jianxin Li*, Yu Jia*, Lu Liu +, Tianyu Wo*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UDORA - University of Derby Online Research Archive 1 CyberLiveApp: A Secure Sharing and Migration Approach for Live Virtual Desktop Applications in a Cloud Environment Jianxin Li*, Yu Jia*, Lu Liu +, Tianyu Wo* *School of computer Science & Engineering +School of Computing and Mathematics Beihang University, Beijing, China University of Derby, Derby, UK E-mail: {lijx,jiayu,woty }@act.buaa.edu.cn E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In recent years we have witnessed the rapid advent of cloud computing, in which the remote software is delivered as a service and accessed by users using a thin client over the Internet. In particular, the traditional desktop application can execute in the remote virtual machines without re-architecture providing a personal desktop experience to users through remote display technologies. However, existing cloud desktop applications mainly achieve isolation environments using virtual machines (VMs), which cannot adequately support application-oriented collaborations between multiple users and VMs. In this paper, we propose a flexible collaboration approach, named CyberLiveApp, to enable live virtual desktop applications sharing based on a cloud and virtualization infrastructure. The CyberLiveApp supports secure application sharing and on-demand migration among multiple users or equipment. To support VM desktop sharing among multiple users, a secure access mechanism is developed to distinguish view privileges allowing window operation events to be tracked to compute hidden window areas in real time. A proxy-based window filtering mechanism is also proposed to deliver desktops to different users. To support application sharing and migration between VMs, we use the presentation streaming redirection mechanism and VM cloning service.
    [Show full text]
  • Brett Caine Senior Vice President and General Manager, Online Services Division 28% 31% 101%
    Brett Caine Senior Vice President and General Manager, Online Services Division 28% 31% 101% Web-Based Web-Based Web-Based Remote Support Conferencing Remote Access App Collaboration m1 Revenue Trends 60 50 40 30 20 10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2005 2006 2007 GoToMyPC GoToAssist GoToMeeting+Webinar Slide 3 m1 Scott Allen will update for Q4 2007. Morgan: Scott A. will give you the final Q4 numbers to bring this up to date. Mike Musson, 2/5/2008 $2.9 Billion 15-20% 15-20% 20- 30% $270 Million $300 Million Remote Remote Access Support Web Conferencing Source: Company estimates & report from IDC, March 2007 Worldwide Software on-Demand Revenue, 2006-2011 PowerfulPowerful && simplesimple NoNo trainingtraining && nono customizationcustomization requiredrequired TechnicalTechnical && businessbusiness platformplatform investmentinvestment DrivingDriving marketmarket share,share, customercustomer reachreach && globalglobal footprintfootprint Coming Soon! New WebWeb--basedbased CollaborationCollaboration BreakthroughBreakthrough innovationinnovation inin voicevoice communicationcommunication –– simple,simple, easyeasy && integratedintegrated New Coming Soon! WebWeb--basedbased RemoteRemote SupportSupport ExpandingExpanding RemoteRemote SupportSupport beyondbeyond thethe CallCall CenterCenter Beta:Beta: express.gotoassist.comexpress.gotoassist.com PLATINUM GoToAssist Enterprise reach Differentiation Online Support Citrix Delivery Center & Collaboration Web-based Remote Remote International Enterprise Collaboration Support Access Expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Citrix Xendesktop 7.5 Und Xenapp Kennen
    Wissen, wie’s geht. Leseprobe Anhand eines durchgängigen Praxisszenarios lernen Sie den Einsatz von Citrix XenDesktop 7.5 und XenApp kennen. Daher liefern wir Ihnen zum idealen Start die ersten drei Kapitel des Buches. Außer- dem können Sie einen Blick in das vollständige Inhalts- und Stich- wortverzeichnis werfen. »Einführung« »Desktop- und Anwendungs-Remoting« »XenDesktop- und XenApp-Architektur« Inhalt Index Die Autoren Leseprobe weiterempfehlen Nico Lüdemann, Jan Hendrik Meier Citrix XenDesktop 7.5 und XenApp – Das Praxishandbuch für Administratoren 630 Seiten, gebunden, 5. Auflage 2014 59,90 Euro, ISBN 978-3-8362-2744-5 www.galileo-press.de/3527 Kapitel 1 Einführung Die dynamische und flexible Bereitstellung von Anwendungen, Diensten und Informationen ist eine der wichtigsten Zielstellungen der heutigen IT-Welt. Die in den Medien stark propagierte Desktop- Virtualisierung scheint in vielerlei Hinsicht ein adäquater Ansatz für die gestellten Anforderungen zu sein. 1.1 Schöne, neue Welt Betrachtet man Veröffentlichungen diverser Analysten zu den großen Trends der IT, so wird man heutzutage in erster Linie mit vier großen Schlagworten konfrontiert: ̈ Big Data ̈ Cloud ̈ Mobility ̈ Social Diese vier Aspekte der schönen, neuen IT-Welt bestimmen die Literatur, die Diskus- sionsforen und nicht zuletzt das Marketing aller großen Hersteller. Glaubt man den Prognosen, so wird in den kommenden Jahren eine neue Generation von IT-affinen und in der digitalen Welt aufgewachsenen Benutzern mit einer großen Variations- breite von unterschiedlichen Endgeräten unterwegs sein, die ultramobil und rund um die Uhr mit Hilfe innovativer und viraler Konzepte für ihre Arbeitgeber aktiv sind. Durch Apps, die speziell für einen spezifischen Einsatzzweck entwickelt wurden, End- geräte, die dem persönlichen Habitus am nächsten kommen, und Dienste, die jeder- zeit den Zugriff auf die gewünschten Daten und Informationen bieten, wird eine neue Evolutionsstufe der Produktivität erreicht, die bisher undenkbar gewesen ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Statement
    Dear Stockholder: April 15, 2010 You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Citrix Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. PT, at the Company’s offices at 4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, United States. At this Annual Meeting, the agenda includes the election of three (3) Class III directors for three-year terms, approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2010. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR election of the director nominees, FOR approval of the amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Similar to last year, we are providing proxy material access to our stockholders via the Internet. Accordingly, you can access proxy materials and vote at www.proxyvote.com. Details regarding the matters to be acted upon at this Annual Meeting are described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) you received in the mail. Please give the proxy materials your careful attention. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on your Notice and on that website. In order to vote via the Internet or by telephone, you must have the stockholder identification number which is provided in your Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Title (Use Style: Paper Title)
    Volume 2, No. 12, December 2011 Journal of Global Research in Computer Science RESEARCH PAPER Available Online at www.jgrcs.info VIRTUALIZATION TECHNIQUES & TECHNOLOGIES: STATE-OF-THE-ART Rabi Prasad Padhy*1, Manas Ranjan Patra2, Suresh Chandra Satapathy3 *1 Senior Software Engineer, Oracle Corporation, Bangalore, India [email protected] 2Associate Professor, PG Department of Computer Science, Berhampur University, Berhampur, India [email protected] 3HOD & Professor, Department of Computer Science, ANITS, Sanivasala, India [email protected] Abstract: Today virtualization is not just a possibility but it is becoming mainstream in data centers across the business world. Virtualization technology is popular today for hosting Internet and cloud-based computer services. Technology is evolving at a rapid rate and virtualization is no longer just about consolidation and cost savings, It is about the agility and flexibility needed for service delivery in data centers, including production environment and the infrastructure that supports the most mission-critical applications. Virtualization is a rapidly evolving technology that provides a range of benefits to computing systems, such as improved resource utilization and management, application isolation and portability and system reliability. Among these features, live migration, resources management, IT infrastructure consolidation are core functions. Virtualization technology also enables IT personnel to respond to business needs more rapidly with lower cost and improved operational efficiencies. Virtualization technologies are changing the IT delivery model to provide on-demand self-service access to a shared pool of computing resources via broad network. The analysis of this survey will enable a better understanding of basic concept of virtualization, virtualization techniques, technologies, services and motivate especially Information Technologies (IT) staff as a detailed framework for the companies working in different industrial sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ardence Readyon®
    KEY FEATURES ® Ardence ReadyOn Instant On for Windows® Devices Consumers have grown averse to slow boot times, and unreliable, unsecured devices. They want feature-rich devices with streamlined user experiences, such as instant availability. Yet OEMs are challenged by the task of integrating additional functionality into smaller packages with higher performance. Ardence’s ReadyOn, provides that instant availability today, along with other desirable features, and Ardence is the market leader with more than one million deployments as of 2005. OVERVIEW OEMs are producing smaller, faster, devices using the Windows platform. Ardence ReadyOn enables OEMs to integrate instant availability with enhanced reliability and Ardence ReadyOn at a Glance corruption protection into their designs. Additional benefits include reducing manufacturing costs and speeding time to market. The enhanced end-user experience of instant-on/off functionality and secure, corruption-proof reliability in Robust, high-performance Windows • devices using the Windows operating system provides OEMs with clear competitive instant-on and off: boot time is advantages and the required functionality to compete in tomorrow’s markets. virtually eliminated INSTANT ON/OFF Corruption and virus proof: • ReadyOn ensures instantaneous device operability. ReadyOn-enabled devices hardened “appliance” environments bypass the driver loads, OS boot, network configuration, and application loading by provide increased system security accessing a pre-configured environment – bringing a device
    [Show full text]
  • Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet
    Case Study Soft Servo Systems, Inc. – Motion Control Systems Overview Founded in 1998, by MIT professionals, Soft Servo Systems, Inc. offers high-performing, innovative, and affordable motion control solutions to high-volume OEMs in the machine tool, factory automation and general motion control industries. By teaming with Ardence, Inc. (also founded by MIT professionals) during early product development, Soft Servo Systems integrated Ardence RTX’s high reliability and real-time control, to be among the first to develop a truly PC-based servo controller in which a single, powerful Windows- based host computer performs all real-time motion control operations. The combined solution enhances reliability, reduces hardware costs, and increases performance over hardware solutions, which previously monopolized the motion control and CNC industries. The Challenge In 1998 a group of the world leaders of machine tool companies co-founded the Next Generation Control Project at MIT to develop new control theory and advanced motion control algorithms, so that PCs would be able to manage motion control without hardware-intensive DSPs or proprietary micro processors, to reduce system costs, add reliability and increase supportability. Soft Servo Systems formed out of this project, having developed advanced theory and complex control algorithms that accomplished these goals. Because reliability and supportability were paramount, Soft Servo Systems selected the robust Microsoft Windows XP Embedded operating system, originally designed by Ardence, which provided a full suite of development tools and a familiar user interface. This also allowed them to achieve a small footprint, which enabled Soft Servo Systems to run the OS on solid state memory, without the reliability issues associated with a hard disk.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Annual Report
    Virtualize. Optimize. Citrix Systems, Inc. Collaborate. Deliver. J Transforming the datacenter into a delivery center. 2007 Annual Report 2007 Annual Report Citrix Systems, Inc. 851 Cypress Creek Road Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 USA J citrix.com 1162351_CSI_Cvr_R262351_CSI_Cvr_R2 1 44/18/08/18/08 110:47:490:47:49 AAMM REVENUE EARNINGS PER SHARE OPERATING CASH FLOW (millions) (millions) CORPORATE INFORMATION $1.14 Citrix Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq:CTXS) is the global leader and the most trusted name in application delivery infrastructure. More $1,392 $0.97 $424 than 215,000 organizations worldwide rely on Citrix to deliver any application to users anywhere with the best performance, $0.93 highest security and lowest cost. Citrix customers include 100% of the Fortune 100 companies and 99% of the Fortune Global $1,134 $329 500, as well as hundreds of thousands of small businesses and prosumers. The Citrix Partner Network has approximately 8,000 $909 $293 partners in more than 100 countries. Annual revenue in 2007 was $1.4 billion. Learn more at www.citrix.com. Corporate Headquarters Online Division Headquarters Silicon Valley Headquarters Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Santa Barbara, CA, USA Santa Clara, CA, USA EMEA Headquarters Pacifi c Headquarters Latin America Headquarters 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 Schaffhausen, Switzerland Hong Kong, China Coral Gables, FL, USA India Development Center Sydney Development Center UK Development Center FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Bangalore, India Sydney, Australia Chalfont, United Kingdom Year ended December 31, (In thousands, except per share data) 2007 2006 2005 STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION Net revenues $ 1,391,942 $ 1,134,319 $ 908,722 Corporate Offi cers Board of Directors Investor Relations Mark B.
    [Show full text]
  • VDI: a New Desktop Strategy
    WHITE PAPER VDI: A New Desktop Strategy A Guide to Managing User Desktop Environments with Virtual Desktop Infrastructure VMware Virtual Desktop Infrastructure VDI – A New Desktop Strategy Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................1 A Brief History of Desktop Management ..................................................................1 Execution Models..............................................................................................................................................................................1 Early Centralized Computing.....................................................................................................................................................1 Distributed Computing .................................................................................................................................................................1 Windows Server Based Computing .......................................................................................................................................2 Problems with Terminal Server Designs..............................................................................................................................2 What is VDI?....................................................................................................................3 VDI’s Contributions to Desktop Management.........................................................3 VDI offers
    [Show full text]