Fighting Against Erasure: the Case of the Black, Childfree and Professional Woman in South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fighting Against Erasure: the Case of the Black, Childfree and Professional Woman in South Africa Fighting against erasure: The case of the black, childfree and professional woman in South Africa. Sizakele Marutlulle A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Johannesburg, March 2020 Declaration I, Sizakele Marutlulle, Student Number N0215264, declare that ‘Fighting Against Erasure: The Case of the Black, Childfree and Professional Woman in South Africa’ is my own work and that all the sources I have used/quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. Signature…………………………………………… Sizakele Marutlulle Date…………………………………….. i Dedication To Khumbuzile ‘Dal’okuhle’ Marutlulle, who gave me life. ii Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Melissa Steyn, South African Research Chair in Diversity Studies and my Supervisor, who championed this work from the beginning and was unrelenting in her support throughout. I also place on record my profound gratitude to Dr T – to whom I am greatly indebted for his sincere guidance and unwavering encouragement through every phase of this journey. I thank the narrators who trusted me with their stories. I also extend my gratitude to all the members of my ‘tribe’, for their unceasing encouragement and support. iii Abstract Previous studies have reflected on childfreeness as a growing reproductive choice. What has been lacking in literature is an understanding of childfreeness in Africa in general and among black childfree professional women (BCPW) in particular. This research examined the erasure and lived-experiences of black childfree professional women in South Africa. It also problematised the conflation of woman with mother, and the extent to which such conflation embeds pronatalist cultural imperatives of femininity as well as traditional gender roles. This study investigated the lived-experiences of seven (7) childfree women. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and these were analysed using thematic analysis. The women’s upbringing, values, beliefs, and internal locus of control emerged as cornerstones in their decision to reject motherhood and embrace childfreeness. Their resilience anchored this choice and their resistance enabled them to withstand the negative consequence of childfreeness within a culture that valorises motherhood. Their experiences of social exclusion and ‘Othering’ supported findings of other studies. However, a pointed experience of demonization by black mothers in particular was a key and unique discovery. The findings present childfreeness as agentic decision-making - an activist and feminist stance that challenges as well as broadens the concepts of womanhood, diversity and reproductive freedom. In totality, the study offers new understanding of BCPW and suggests that this unconventional yet legitimate reproductive choice may advance the decoupling of motherhood from feminine identity in ways that are liberatory for all women. The social acceptance of childfreeness as an expression of one of the many diverse feminine experiences accessible to all women, could augur well for the ultimate achievement of reproductive justice. iv Contents Declaration .............................................................................................................................. i Dedication ............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. iii Abstract ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 .............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Rationale for this research ............................................................................................... 4 1.3 Research questions ........................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Aims and objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Anticipated contribution of this Study ............................................................................. 6 1.6 My point of entry ............................................................................................................. 7 1.7 Overview of Chapters ...................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................................................................ 11 THEORETICAL POSITIONING ............................................................................................ 11 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Feminist Theory ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 First-Wave Feminism.............................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Second-Wave Feminism ......................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Third-Wave Feminism ............................................................................................ 15 2.2.4 The Fourth Wave of Feminism ............................................................................... 20 2.3 Feminist perspectives on motherhood ........................................................................... 32 2.3.1 Motherhood Perspectives in the First Wave of Feminism ...................................... 33 2.3.2 Motherhood perspectives in the Second Wave of Feminism .................................. 34 2.3.3 Motherhood perspectives in The Third Wave of Feminism ................................... 39 2.3.4 Black feminist perspective on Motherhood ............................................................ 43 2.4 Intersectionality.............................................................................................................. 44 2.5 Identity Theory............................................................................................................... 49 2.6 Gender Theory ............................................................................................................... 52 2.7 Critical Diversity Theory ............................................................................................... 54 2.8 The Question of Affect .................................................................................................. 61 2.9 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 62 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................................ 64 THE CHILDFREE CHOICE: GENESIS, EVOLUTION AND MEANING .......................... 64 v 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 64 3.2 The childfree choice: attitudes and trends ..................................................................... 64 3.2.1 Choice and practice ................................................................................................. 65 3.2.2 Characteristics of the Childfree .............................................................................. 67 3.2.3 Different forms of childlessness ............................................................................. 68 3.2.4 Decision- making, motives and the continuum of childfreeness ............................ 69 3.2.5 The pull and push of motherhood ........................................................................... 71 3.3 Pronatalist Views ........................................................................................................... 73 3.3.1 The Value of Children (VOC) ................................................................................ 74 3.3.2 The child and manhood ............................................................................................... 76 3.4 Stereotypes of the childfree ........................................................................................... 76 3.4.1 Stigma ..................................................................................................................... 76 3.4.2 Stereotypes .............................................................................................................. 77 3.5 Privilege and Power ....................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 4: ................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Book of Abstracts
    Fourth Biennial EAAS Women’s Network Symposium Feminisms in American Studies in/and Crisis: Where Do We Go from Here? April 28 and 29, 2021 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS EAAS Women’s Network [email protected] http://women.eaas.eu IN COLLABORATION WITH 2 INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM AND LITERATURE: THINKING THROUGH “UGLY FEELINGS”? Gabrielle Adjerad In light of what has been institutionalized in the nineties as “intersectionality” (Crenshaw, 1989), but emanated from a long tradition of feminism fostered by women of color (Hill-Collins, Bilge, 2016), feminist theory has increasingly shed light on the plurality of women’s experiences, the inseparable, overlapping and simultaneous differences constituting their identities, and the materiality of the various dominations engendered. At the turn of the twenty-first century, this paradigm seems compelling to address fictional diasporic narratives addressing the diverse discriminations encountered by migrant women and their descendants in the United States. However, adopting an intersectional feminist approach of literature, for research or in the classroom, raises methodological issues that this paper contends with. Some thinkers have considered the double pitfall of considering, on the one hand, the text as a mimetic document of plural lives and, on the other, of essentializing a symbolical “écriture feminine” (Felski, 1989). Some have highlighted the necessary critical movement between the archetypal dimension of gender and the social and historical individuals diversely affected by this ideology (De Lauretis, 1987). Yet, beyond this tension between an attention paid to abstraction on the one hand and experience on the other, we can consider that hegemony is made of different ideologies that may contradict one another (Balibar, Wallerstein, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • International Womxn's
    1 Carr Center for Human Rights | International Women‘s Day MARCHMARCH 8, 2021 8, 2021 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY HARVARDRealizing KENNEDY the Rights SCHOOLof Womxn and Girls Worldwide International Womxn’s Day In recognition of International Womxn’s Day this year, we spoke with faculty and fellows across the center and asked them to share their insight on one question: What do we need to focus on in the coming year to fully realize the rights of womxn and girls around the world? Here’s what they had to say. 2 Carr Center for Human Rights | International Women‘s Day Of the estimated 450 million people working in global supply chains, the vast majority of low-paid, low-skilled workers are womxn. When multinational corporations aim to maximize profits by offshoring, outsourcing, and subcontracting, they often turn to suppliers whose low prices reflect poor working conditions and indecent wages. In this context, differing social roles make womxn especially vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. Consequently, gender- based violence and pay gaps are endemic to global supply chains. COVID-19 has exacerbated this affront to womxn’s rights by slashing demand for consumer products—especially apparel, which relies heavily on the labor of womxn. Over the past year, many global supply chain workers were laid off, experienced wage theft, or worked in unsafe environments. For womxn, who often already work ELIZABETH BENNETT multiple (paying and unpaying) jobs, this has created an unconscionable spike in income- and time-poverty. In the coming year, to more fully realize the rights Research Fellow, Carr Center; of womxn and girls in global supply chains, we need to focus on gender in due Joseph M.
    [Show full text]
  • National Conference
    NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE POPULAR CULTURE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN CULTURE ASSOCIATION In Memoriam We honor those members who passed away this last year: Mortimer W. Gamble V Mary Elizabeth “Mery-et” Lescher Martin J. Manning Douglas A. Noverr NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE POPULAR CULTURE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN CULTURE ASSOCIATION APRIL 15–18, 2020 Philadelphia Marriott Downtown Philadelphia, PA Lynn Bartholome Executive Director Gloria Pizaña Executive Assistant Robin Hershkowitz Graduate Assistant Bowling Green State University Sandhiya John Editor, Wiley © 2020 Popular Culture Association Additional information about the PCA available at pcaaca.org. Table of Contents President’s Welcome ........................................................................................ 8 Registration and Check-In ............................................................................11 Exhibitors ..........................................................................................................12 Special Meetings and Events .........................................................................13 Area Chairs ......................................................................................................23 Leadership.........................................................................................................36 PCA Endowment ............................................................................................39 Bartholome Award Honoree: Gary Hoppenstand...................................42 Ray and Pat Browne Award
    [Show full text]
  • Womxn of Color in Print Subculture: 1970-2018
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Summer 2019 Womxn of Color in Print Subculture: 1970-2018 Lenora Yee University of Puget Sound Follow this and additional works at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the African American Studies Commons, Asian American Studies Commons, Chicana/o Studies Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Fiction Commons, Illustration Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Latina/o Studies Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, Nonfiction Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Poetry Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Yee, Lenora, "Womxn of Color in Print Subculture: 1970-2018" (2019). Summer Research. 357. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/357 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Zine Honoring Works of Womxn of Color in Print Subculture: 1970-2018 by: Lenora Yee 3 A ZINE HONORING WORKS OF WOMXN OF COLOR IN PRINT SUBCULTURE: 1970-2018 WRITTEN AND ILLUSTRATED BY LENORA YEE 4 Introduction This zine is a compilation of five womxn of color collectives spanning from 1970-2018 that engaged in print subculture by producing alternative written word works in different mediums as an extension of their activism. Researching archival primary sources, I sought out the narratives that utilized written word as a mode for advocating change from different womxn of color collectives, or works written through a collective voice of womxn of color. The collectives I am focusing on include Asian Lesbians of the East Coast (ALOEC), Las Buenas Amigas (LBA), The Griot Press (African Ancestral Lesbians), the book #NotYourPrincess Voices of Native American Women and select works published by Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMXN: an Evolution of Identity
    Summit to Salish Sea: Inquiries and Essays Volume 4 Cohort 16 Article 2 11-4-2019 WOMXN: An Evolution of Identity Ash D. Kunz Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/s2ss Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Sociology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Place and Environment Commons, and the Theory and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Kunz, A. D. (2019). WOMXN: An Evolution of Identity. Summit to Salish Sea: Inquiries and Essays, 4(1). Retrieved from https://cedar.wwu.edu/s2ss/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Peer-reviewed Journals at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summit to Salish Sea: Inquiries and Essays by an authorized editor of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kunz: WOMXN: An Evolution of Identity W⚲MXN: An Evolution of Identity Ash Kunz,, Western Washington University Abstract Environmental Education is situated firmly in the hegemony of White, settler-colonial, capitalistic, able-bodied and –minded, heteronormative, patriarchal society. Individuals whose identity does not conform to this dominant metanarrative are excluded from and marginalized by “othering”. Trauma and violence are commonplace in society against Indigenous peoples, Black and Latinx folx and People of Color, womxn, people with disabilities, people in the LGBTQIA+ community, and all minoritized identities. That history of trauma, coupled with social and physical isolation can lead to mental and emotional struggles that negatively impact personal wellbeing. A lack of wellbeing, in turn can lead to or further depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Hip Hop Feminism Comes of Age.” I Am Grateful This Is the First 2020 Issue JHHS Is Publishing
    Halliday and Payne: Twenty-First Century B.I.T.C.H. Frameworks: Hip Hop Feminism Come Published by VCU Scholars Compass, 2020 1 Journal of Hip Hop Studies, Vol. 7, Iss. 1 [2020], Art. 1 Editor in Chief: Travis Harris Managing Editor Shanté Paradigm Smalls, St. John’s University Associate Editors: Lakeyta Bonnette-Bailey, Georgia State University Cassandra Chaney, Louisiana State University Willie "Pops" Hudson, Azusa Pacific University Javon Johnson, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Elliot Powell, University of Minnesota Books and Media Editor Marcus J. Smalls, Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) Conference and Academic Hip Hop Editor Ashley N. Payne, Missouri State University Poetry Editor Jeffrey Coleman, St. Mary's College of Maryland Global Editor Sameena Eidoo, Independent Scholar Copy Editor: Sabine Kim, The University of Mainz Reviewer Board: Edmund Adjapong, Seton Hall University Janee Burkhalter, Saint Joseph's University Rosalyn Davis, Indiana University Kokomo Piper Carter, Arts and Culture Organizer and Hip Hop Activist Todd Craig, Medgar Evers College Aisha Durham, University of South Florida Regina Duthely, University of Puget Sound Leah Gaines, San Jose State University Journal of Hip Hop Studies 2 https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/jhhs/vol7/iss1/1 2 Halliday and Payne: Twenty-First Century B.I.T.C.H. Frameworks: Hip Hop Feminism Come Elizabeth Gillman, Florida State University Kyra Guant, University at Albany Tasha Iglesias, University of California, Riverside Andre Johnson, University of Memphis David J. Leonard, Washington State University Heidi R. Lewis, Colorado College Kyle Mays, University of California, Los Angeles Anthony Nocella II, Salt Lake Community College Mich Nyawalo, Shawnee State University RaShelle R.
    [Show full text]
  • Genders & Sexualities Terms
    GENDERS & SEXUALITIES TERMS All terms should be evaluated by your local community to determine what best fits. As with all language, the communities that utilize these and other words may have different meanings and reasons for using different terminology within different groups. Agender: a person who does not identify with a gender identity or gender expression; some agender-identifying people consider themselves gender neutral, genderless, and/or non- binary, while some consider “agender” to be their gender identity. Ally/Accomplice: a person who recognizes their privilege and is actively engaged in a community of resistance to dismantle the systems of oppression. They do not show up to “help” or participate as a way to make themselves feel less guilty about privilege but are able to lean into discomfort and have hard conversations about being held accountable and the ways they must use their privilege and/or social capital for the true liberation of oppressed communities. Androgynous: a person who expresses or presents merged socially-defined masculine and feminine characteristics, or mainly neutral characteristics. Asexual: having a lack of (or low level of) sexual attraction to others and/or a lack of interest or desire for sex or sexual partners. Asexuality exists on a spectrum from people who experience no sexual attraction nor have any desire for sex, to those who experience low levels of sexual attraction and only after significant amounts of time. Many of these different places on the spectrum have their own identity labels. Another term used within the asexual community is “ace,” meaning someone who is asexual.
    [Show full text]
  • “Women's Issues Representative At-Large” Position to the “Womxn's
    Originally Presented on: February 6th, 2020 Type of Action: Internal Policy 1 Status/Result: New Business 2 3 4 S.A. Joint Resolution #112 5 6 Changing the “Women's Issues Representative At-Large” position to the “Womxn’s 7 Issues Representative At- Large” 8 9 ABSTRACT: This resolution seeks to amend the Cornell Student Assembly Bylaws and Charter, 10 changing the “Women's Issues Representative At-Large” position to the “Womxn’s Issues 11 Representative At- Large”. 12 13 Sponsored by: The Cornell Student Assembly’s Black Caucus 14 15 Whereas, this resolution is not predicated with the intent of a debate on what is “womxn” or 16 “womxnhood,” instead is an active step for inclusion and a continual engagement and progressing 17 towards gender justice;3 18 19 Whereas, more than two genders exist;4 20 21 Whereas, more than two sexes exist;5 22 23 Whereas, sex is an illogic marker of gender; 24 25 Whereas, wrongly, sex and gender are often conflated and confounded as a single overlapping, 26 interchangeable identity; 27 28 Whereas, the word “womxn” acknowledges intersectional feminism—and more specifically Black trans 29 intersectional feminism; 30 31 Whereas, the word “womxn” is a modification in spelling that is to “stress the concept that womxn are 32 their own separate individuals, capable of operating on their own and without a man to help 33 them”;6 34 35 Whereas,“[The] x allows space for individuals who identify as genderfluid, genderqueer, gender non- 36 conforming, or non-binary. The “x” in womxn works the same way, and as such, opens up the 37 free-human-woman concept to include trans women”;7 38 1 As it stands, the Black Caucus requests that all resolutions manufactured by the Caucus to then be approved by the Student Assembly (which most, if not all resolutions will not fall under), respectfully be labeled a “Joint Resolution”.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Parity in the C-Suite
    Building New Foundations in the Cannabis Industry: Gender Parity In The C-Suite INDUS ABIS TR N Y N AS A S C O L C A I N A T O I I I O O T T N N A A N Gender Parity In The C-SuiteN 1 T h g e r C .o an try nabisIndus 01. © 2021 The Arcview Group and NCIA. All rights reserved. Building New Foundations in the Cannabis Industry: and recreational cannabis in the United States are on pace to Gender Parity In eclipse $15 billion by the end of 20203, and if you include ancillary products and services, the industry is estimated to reach $68.4 The C-Suite billion by 2021.4 Womxn5, however, are not equally represented in the cannabis Getting to gender parity via sector’s C-Suite6; those of color and nonbinary have even less anti-racist inclusive strategies representation. The lack of equal representation, including BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) and LGBTQIA+ womxn, Authors: negatively impacts every level of the industry, from products to Christine De La Rosa, CEO & National Co-Founder of The People’s marketing to access and, ultimately, revenue and the creation of Dispensary, The People’s Holdings, Founding Partner, CBxShield generational wealth. Kelly Perez, CEO/Co-founder of kindColorado, President/Co- founder of Cannabis Doing Good and Co-Executive Director/ Businesses are not as competitive or profitable without womxn in founder of Cannabis Impact Fund their leadership ranks. Elise Serbaroli, Director of Global Business Development at Strimo • Companies with more womxn in leadership roles are more profitable.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Strait Oregon 0171A 12876.Pdf
    OCCUPYING A THIRD PLACE: PRO-LIFE FEMINISM, LEGIBLE POLITICS, AND THE EDGE OF WOMEN’S LIBERATION by LAURA STRAIT A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Laura Strait Title: Occupying a Third Place: Pro-Life Feminism, Legible Politics, and the Edge of Women's Liberation This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Gretchen Soderlund Chairperson Carol Stabile Core Member Biswarup Sen Core Member Michael Allan Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2020 ii © 2020 Laura E Strait This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Laura Strait Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2020 Title: Occupying a Third Place: Pro-Life Feminism, Legible Politics, and the Edge of Women's Liberation This dissertation reads pro-life feminism as a break from traditional public perceptions of feminist thought. Through a variety of methodological analyses, it engages three case studies to answer (1) How does pro-life feminism persist as a movement and idea? And (2) What does the existence of pro-life feminists mean for the discursive boundaries of pro-choice feminism? This project included archival research on major feminist, anti-feminist, and pro-life feminist organizations, as well as long-form interviews with founding members of the pro-life feminist organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Essay
    NOTE TO THE READER: We recognize that the intersections of gender identity, reproductive physiology, and experience are vast and infinite. We have chosen to use the words “woman” and “female” as umbrella terms, fully recognizing that feminist-minded variants such as womxn and femme are meaningful ways of revealing gender bias in language and society at large. The discussion about gendered language is constantly evolving. Our use of the terms “woman” and “female” is intended to include all cis, non-binary, and trans women and any other person who identifies as a woman. See Breena Kerr, “What Do Womxn Want?,” New York Times, March 14, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/style/womxn.html. Reproductive Health, Fertility, Agency The female body has long been a site of injustice, and throughout history issues relating to women’s reproductive health have been shrouded in shame and hobbled by bad science and discrimination. From the fraught history of birth control, to the inequities surrounding care for women of color, to the struggles of non-cis individuals trying to conceive, and the near silence in our culture surrounding miscarriage, menstruation, and menopause, fertility has been either overtly politicized or rendered invisible for too long. The exhibition Reproductive: Health, Fertility, Agency from two essays: Audre Lorde’s “Uses of the Erotic” features works by eight artists that explore the (1978) and Linda Williams’s “Make Love, Not War: psychological, physical, and emotional realities Jane Fonda Comes Home (1968–1978)” (2008). women experience surrounding fertility. Fearlessly Williams’s essay details the revolutionary shift tackling topics such as pleasure, pregnancy, toward a growing understanding of the female body trauma, infertility, and abortion, these artists in the 1970s based on solid sexology research over also shed stark light on the patriarchal systems previously ascribed masculinist standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Provocations to German Idealist Aesthetics
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 6-2020 Toward feminist aesthetics: feminist provocations to German idealist aesthetics Amelia Hruby DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hruby, Amelia, "Toward feminist aesthetics: feminist provocations to German idealist aesthetics" (2020). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 296. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/296 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOWARD FEMINIST AESTHETICS: FEMINIST PROVOCATIONS TO GERMAN IDEALIST AESTHETICS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2020 By Amelia Hruby Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois i © 2020 by Amelia Hruby All Rights Reserved ii To my feminist foremothers, to my mother, and to all the women who’ve raised me and walked with me. iii I have no interest in making work that doesn’t elicit a feeling. Kara Walker Eventually, to behold is to become beholden to. Jenny Odell, How to Do
    [Show full text]