Joint Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Committee COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA JOINT COMMITTEE on THE NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY Reference: Evaluation of the National Crime Authority BRISBANE Wednesday, 21 May 1997 OFFICIAL HANSARD REPORT CANBERRA JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY Members: Mr Bradford (Chair) Senator Conroy Mr Filing Senator Ferris Mr Sercombe Senator Gibbs Mr Truss Senator McGauran Mrs West Senator Stott Despoja The Parliamentary Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority has resolved that it will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the operations of the National Crime Authority. The committee will examine in particular: (1) the constitution, role, functions and powers of the authority, and the need for a body such as the authority, having regard to the activities of other Commonwealth and state law enforcement agencies; (2) the efficiency and effectiveness of the authority; (3) accountability and parliamentary supervision of the authority; and (4) the need for amendment of the National Crime Authority Act 1984. WITNESSES BEVAN, Mr David John, Deputy Director, Official Misconduct Division, Criminal Justice Commission, 557 Coronation Drive, Toowong, Queensland 4066 ........................................... 83 BOTTOM, Mr Robert ............................................ 18 CLAIR, Mr Francis Joseph, Chairperson, Criminal Justice Commission, 557 Coronation Drive, Toowong, Queensland 4066 ..................... 83 DEARDEN, Mr Ian Francis, President, Queensland Council for Civil Liberties, GPO Box 2281, Brisbane Queensland 4001 ................ 67 IRWIN, Mr Marshall Philip, Member, Bar Association of Queensland, Level 5, Inns of Court, 107 North Quay, Brisbane, Queensland 4000 ........... 3 McHUGH, Inspector Dominic Gerard, Staff Officer to Assistant Commissioner, State Crime Operations, Queensland Police Service, 100 Roma Street, Brisbane, Queensland ............................ 116 ROGER, Mr Paul, Director, Intelligence, Criminal Justice Commission, 557 Coronation Drive, Toowong, Queensland 4066 ..................... 83 RUTLEDGE, Mr Paul Francis, Consultant Crown Prosecutor, Office of Director of Public Prosecutions, GPO Box 2403, Brisbane, Queensland . 56 JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY Evaluation of the National Crime Authority BRISBANE Wednesday, 21 May 1997 Present Mr Bradford (Chair) Senator Conroy Mr Filing Senator Ferris Senator Gibbs Senator McGauran The committee met at 9.04 a.m. Mr Bradford took the chair. 1 NCA 2 JOINT Wednesday, 21 May 1997 CHAIR—I declare open this public hearing into the evaluation of the National Crime Authority by the Joint Parliamentary Committee. I would like to make a few brief opening remarks. I am happy to make these opening remarks available to the press if they do not already have them. The committee is required by section 55 of the National Crime Authority Act 1984 to monitor and review the performance by the authority of its functions. It has been performing this task for the past 13 years with mixed success. The committee last undertook a comprehensive evaluation of the authority in 1990-91, which led to the committee tabling a report in November 1991 entitled, Who is to guard the guards? The current committee was established in May last year in the new parliament and has since found the operations of the NCA to be even more embroiled in controversy than usual. In particular, Mr Justice Merkel in the Federal Court of Australia in June 1996, and Mr Justice Vincent in the Victorian Supreme Court in August 1996, made adverse findings which went very much to the heart of the NCA’s operations. While both cases are being appealed, and the outcomes of the appeals will go a long way towards clarifying the authority’s continuing statutory basis, the committee felt that in all the circumstances it was timely for it to conduct another comprehensive evaluation. The proposed legislative reforms of 1992, which had been intended to implement the committee’s 1991 findings, were laid aside by the then Attorney-General because of fundamental differences with the Senate. Now, some five years later, those reforms still remain to be implemented. Much has also happened in the interim, of course, with the reforms arising from the 1994 report on Commonwealth law enforcement arrangements and the budget cuts implemented by both the former and current governments. Today’s hearing is the first of a program of hearings which the committee proposes to conduct around Australia to get an in-depth feel for the issues and to hear what the experts in the community think that the NCA should be doing in the future. NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY Wednesday, 21 May 1997 JOINT NCA 3 IRWIN, Mr Marshall Philip, Member, Bar Association of Queensland, Level 5, Inns of Court, 107 North Quay, Brisbane, Queensland 4000 CHAIR—Welcome. I thank Mr Irwin for making himself available despite the pressure I am sure he must have with his court commitments. Mr Irwin, before asking you to make an opening statement, I am required to state that, if during the hearing you consider that information you might wish to give or a comment requested by a committee member is of a confidential or private nature, you can make application for that information or comment to be given in camera and the committee will consider your application at that time. I understand that you want to make a statement and that, ultimately, members of the committee will have that statement. Mr Irwin—Thank you, Mr Chairman and members of the committee. The Bar Association has prepared a submission in written form for the purposes of this inquiry, and I will be able to make that submission available to you within the next few days. At this stage, I will just talk to and summarise the Bar Association’s submission. I will do that under the various terms of reference—firstly, in relation to the constitution, role, functions and powers of the authority and perhaps, more particularly, the need for the National Crime Authority. I preface these comments by saying that, in addressing these issues, the association has been conscious of the tension between civil liberties on the one hand and the need for effective law enforcement on the other. The association accepts that there is a delicate balance to be struck between those two competing interests. Having said that, the association supports the need for a body such as the National Crime Authority, subject to the existence of appropriate safeguards and also subject to it being properly accountable so that it is not able to abuse its powers. The association accepts that there is a growing threat of organised crime and official corruption and that those things do not stop at state borders and that, if that type of conduct is to be effectively dealt with, an organisation such as the authority is essential. Police services in Australia do not have immediate access to the multidisciplinary skills that are available to organisations like the National Crime Authority, and it is considered that they are unlikely to obtain the resources to enable them to have access to the full extent of those skills in the foreseeable future. In addition, traditional police services have enormous demands on them in meeting the everyday needs of the community. Furthermore, they do not have coercive powers. It does not consider that police services should have those coercive powers available to them; it considers that there is unlikely, particularly in the present climate in states such as Queensland—even 10 years after the Fitzgerald inquiry—and currently in New South Wales, to be any public support for the giving of such powers to police services. NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY NCA 4 JOINT Wednesday, 21 May 1997 It also considers that, while ad hoc royal commissions and commissions of inquiry can play a role, they necessarily have a finite existence and they are expensive to operate, whereas a permanent standing royal commission, which is one way of looking at what the National Crime Authority is, has an infrastructure which is readily available to commence investigations and hearings should there be an issue or an investigation requiring that. In addition, a permanent body is able to do so in a much more cost-effective manner than a royal commission. It is in those circumstances that the association accepts the need for a National Crime Authority in the investigation of relevant criminal activities, provided that that activity is multijurisdictional and it cannot effectively be examined and investigated by normal police methods and powers. The association, in its submission, recommends consideration of an amendment to the National Crime Authority Act to add to the definition of relevant criminal activity the requirements that the conduct be multijurisdictional and of a nature that cannot effectively be investigated by normal police methods and powers. Senator McGAURAN—Cannot or when it cannot? Mr Irwin—It would suggest that the authority would only have jurisdiction in relevant criminal activity if both of those criteria were met. Senator McGAURAN—That just about cuts it out completely. Most state jurisdictions can cover investigations. Mr Irwin—That is not really what the association is saying. Senator McGAURAN—It is not what you are saying; I am just trying to clarify what you are saying. Mr Irwin—What we are saying is that it has to relate to a matter that crosses state boundaries—if I did not make that clear—and also that it must not be able to be investigated by normal police methods and powers. That is really to say that coercive powers are necessary to properly and effectively investigate the matter. The association accepts that there are many cases where police officers simply using their normal powers of investigation, conducting records of interview and so forth, without the ability to compel information to be provided to them, are hamstrung from effectively investigating those sorts of activities. Senator McGAURAN—I just wanted clarification. Mr Irwin—I apologise if that was not made entirely clear. It is also considered that those are matters which should be taken into account by the Inter-Governmental Committee in deciding whether to grant a reference to the National Crime Authority.
Recommended publications
  • Long-Running Drama in Theatre of Public Shame
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Long-running drama in theatre of public shame MP Daryl Maguire and NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian in Wagga in 2017. Tom Dusevic OCTOBER 16, 2020 The British have epic soap Coronation Street. Latin Americans crave their telenovelas. The people of NSW must settle for the Independent Commission Against Corruption and its popular offshoot, Keeping Up with the Spivs. The current season is one of the most absorbing: bush huckster Daz Kickback ensnares Gladys Prim in his scams. At week’s end, our heroine is tied to railroad tracks as a steaming locomotive rounds the bend. Stay tuned. In recent years the public has heard allegations of Aldi bags stuffed with cash and delivered to NSW Labor’s Sussex Street HQ by Chinese property developer Huang Xiangmo. In 2013 corruption findings were made against former Labor ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald. The following year, Liberal premier Barry O’Farrell resigned after ICAC obtained a handwritten note that contradicted his claims he did not receive a $3000 bottle of Grange from the head of Australian Water Holdings, a company linked to the Obeids. The same year ICAC’s Operation Spicer investigated allegations NSW Liberals used associated entities to disguise donations from donors banned in the state, such as property developers. Ten MPs either went to the crossbench or quit politics. ICAC later found nine Liberal MPs acted with the intention of evading electoral funding laws, with larceny charges recommended against one. Years earlier there was the sex-for- development scandal, set around the “Table of Knowledge” at a kebab shop where developers met officials from Wollongong council.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report on Trends in Police Corruption
    COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 Parliament House Macquarie Street Sydney 2000 Tel: (02) 9230 2737 Fax: (02) 9230 3309 ISBN 0 7347 6899 0 Table Of Contents COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP .........................................................................................................i CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD..........................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – A TYPOLOGY OF POLICE CORRUPTION........................................................ 3 1.1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF POLICING AND ETHICS LITERATURE.............................................................. 3 1.2 DEFINING POLICE CORRUPTION.............................................................................................. 6 1.3 ROTTEN APPLE VS ROTTEN BARREL ...................................................................................... 10 1.4 CYCLES OF CORRUPTION.................................................................................................... 12 1.5 CORRUPTION – AN ETHICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEM?....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Successful Criminal Entrepreneurs
    THE THEORY OF SUCCESSFUL CRIMINAL ENTREPRENEURS Khaled Alnkhailan BA Criminology and Criminal Justice MA Sociology Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law Queensland University of Technology 2017 Keywords Criminal entrepreneurs, organised crime, non-hierarchical structured organised crime, modus essendi, modus operandi, modus vivendi, leadership, vision, brokerage, bribery, blackmail, mentors, role models, human capital, the theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs i ABSTRACT As typological category, criminal entrepreneurs have a different modus operandi from most traditional criminals. This study develops a theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs, operating in non-hierarchically structured organised crime. Successful criminal entrepreneurs cannot be described through classic criminological theories such as low self-control theory. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs provides an understanding of the leadership of criminal entrepreneurs which includes vision, leadership style and orientation, in addition to their identity. The theory also provides an understanding of the operational approaches used by successful criminal entrepreneurs in addition to the use of their social networks. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs argues that successful criminal entrepreneurs start their careers with a clearly defined vision. Criminal entrepreneurs then lead people towards their vision with a charismatic leadership
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    New South Wales Legislative Assembly PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Fifty-Seventh Parliament First Session Thursday, 6 May 2021 Authorised by the Parliament of New South Wales TABLE OF CONTENTS Announcements ...................................................................................................................................... 6399 COVID-19 Quarantine ........................................................................................................................ 6399 Condolences ............................................................................................................................................ 6399 His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh ....................................................................................... 6399 Budget ..................................................................................................................................................... 6402 Budget Estimates and Related Papers 2020-2021 .............................................................................. 6402 Bills ......................................................................................................................................................... 6403 Canterbury Park Racecourse (Sale and Redevelopment Moratorium) Bill 2021 ............................... 6403 Second Reading Speech .................................................................................................................. 6403 Members ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in High Places to My Wife Gloria and the Late Paul Flannery Corruption in High Places
    Corruption in High Places To my wife Gloria and the late Paul Flannery Corruption in High Places The key witness in the Justice Murphy scandal gives his side of the story Clarrie Briese Contents Foreword by Angela Karpin xi About the author xiii Acknowledgements xv Preface: Extracts of encouragement xvii Part 1: Introduction Could it really be? 1 NSW corruption — a bipartisan matter 2 Letter from Senate Select Committee 3 Bombshell phone taps 4 Why didn’t Briese report this previously? 6 Another judge has the same experience 9 Disturbing phone calls from ‘George’ 9 Encouragement to press on regardless 12 The cost of coming forward 13 Part 2: The Age tapes Emergence of The Age tapes 15 Premier Wran’s protection 17 Briese obtains transcripts of The Age tapes 19 Proposed meeting of Briese with Murphy and Ryan 21 Further references to Briese 26 Senate Committee inquiry impediment 28 The Age tapes are adjudged to be genuine 30 Visit to former Royal Commissioner Stewart 32 Part 3: Briese learns how court corruption works Farquhar’s ‘farewell’ dinner party at Ryan’s home 35 Walker’s advice regarding Cessna/Milner cases 44 Prosecutor Evans — a delayed but key testimony 50 Role of Police Commissioner in Cessna/Milner cases 51 Farquhar: ‘Don’t tell anyone about the dinner’ 52 Farquhar and the Cessna/Milner cases 53 Other controversial court cases involving Farquhar 55 vii Part 4: Judicial independence for magistrates Struggle for judicial independence begins 61 Murphy engineers first meeting with Briese 63 Resistance from the Justice Department 67 Premier Wran — supportive, but ..
    [Show full text]
  • Organised Crime Is an Integral Part of Present Capitalist Society
    Organised crime is an integral part of present capitalist society. In this paper, which was given at the 1984 Marxist Summer School, Denis Freney explains how predominant organised crime is in Australian politics and why you should be concerned. Tl'burw ORGANISED CRIME RIGHTWING LABOR AND CRIME would like to begin looking at this first issue of the new US magazine The wide-ranging subject with a very Rebel. Waas' article was a case study / appropriate quote: "The primary of organised crime in one US city, goals of organised crime ... are the comparable in size to Sydney or maximisation of profit. In order to Melbourne. Elsewhere, Waas achieve the greatest possible return, commented: 'Like the rest of big organised crime has found it expedient business in America, the mafia has to invest some of its capital in the realised that it has to engage .n good government." public relauons to be accepted in their communities, to expand and grow ... This statement comes not from a The only difference is that it is not marxist, but from a recent US federal routine policy for oil companies and task force on organised crime ano it is other corporations to routinely kill Denis Freney quoted in an article The Mob in people as a normal course of everyday Philadelphia by Murray Waas in the business." (Well, not in the US ot A, at 34 ALR Autumn 1984 least, and not there with guns .... ) has become multinational, spreading areas while others are new. All are I'm reminded as far as the first point its empire particularly to the highly profitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Dictionary of Biography Volume 19
    AUSTRALIAN DICTIONARY OF BIOGRAPHY AUSTRALIAN DICTIONARY OF BIOGRAPHY VOLUME 19: 1991–1995 A–Z GENERAL EDITOR Melanie Nolan MANAGING EDITOR Malcolm Allbrook Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760464127 ISBN (online): 9781760464134 WorldCat (print): 1232019838 WorldCat (online): 1232019992 DOI: 10.22459/ADB19 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover artwork: Dora Chapman, Australia, 1911–1995, Self portrait, c.1940, Adelaide, oil on canvas, 74.0 x 62.5 cm (sight), Bequest of the artist 1995, Art Gallery of South Australia, Adelaide, © Art Gallery of South Australia, 957P71 This edition © 2021 ANU Press PREFACE: REFITTING THE ADB 1 This volume of the Australian Dictionary of Biography (ADB), the largest and most successful cooperative research enterprise in the humanities and social sciences in Australia, represents the project’s continuing revision process. In 2013, Christine Fernon and I edited a history of the dictionary, The ADB’s Story, which covered its first six decades.2 The ADB going online in 2006 then seemed to be the major turning point. At the time, it was the book reproduced online with a search function. The pace of change has quickened, however, since Volume 18 was published in 2012. Above all, the ADB Online now leads the process, with the hardcopy volume being published in its wake, rather than the other way around.
    [Show full text]
  • Preaching to the Perverted, March 2013
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Copyright Service. sydney.edu.au/copyright PREACHING TO THE PERVERTED: MICHAEL GLYNN AND THE SYDNEY STAR. Thesis submitted by John Dominic O’Grady in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Arts in the Department of Media and Communications at the University of Sydney. December 2012. Michael Glynn, 1980. Photo courtesy of the Star. 1 Certification of Authorship/Originality! I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text.
    [Show full text]