Long-Running Drama in Theatre of Public Shame

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Long-Running Drama in Theatre of Public Shame ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Long-running drama in theatre of public shame MP Daryl Maguire and NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian in Wagga in 2017. Tom Dusevic OCTOBER 16, 2020 The British have epic soap Coronation Street. Latin Americans crave their telenovelas. The people of NSW must settle for the Independent Commission Against Corruption and its popular offshoot, Keeping Up with the Spivs. The current season is one of the most absorbing: bush huckster Daz Kickback ensnares Gladys Prim in his scams. At week’s end, our heroine is tied to railroad tracks as a steaming locomotive rounds the bend. Stay tuned. In recent years the public has heard allegations of Aldi bags stuffed with cash and delivered to NSW Labor’s Sussex Street HQ by Chinese property developer Huang Xiangmo. In 2013 corruption findings were made against former Labor ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald. The following year, Liberal premier Barry O’Farrell resigned after ICAC obtained a handwritten note that contradicted his claims he did not receive a $3000 bottle of Grange from the head of Australian Water Holdings, a company linked to the Obeids. The same year ICAC’s Operation Spicer investigated allegations NSW Liberals used associated entities to disguise donations from donors banned in the state, such as property developers. Ten MPs either went to the crossbench or quit politics. ICAC later found nine Liberal MPs acted with the intention of evading electoral funding laws, with larceny charges recommended against one. Years earlier there was the sex-for- development scandal, set around the “Table of Knowledge” at a kebab shop where developers met officials from Wollongong council. 2 ICAC was set up in 1988. Famously, one of its early scalps was its champion Liberal Nick Greiner, the state leader who presented as a cleanskin technocrat. Greiner was forced out of office after ICAC found he acted corruptly in a political fix to shore up numbers for his minority government; the Supreme Court later ruled ICAC had gone beyond its powers. Across three decades citizens have watched with disbelief and anger this theatre of public shame, with obliging media packs adding to street walk improvs for the nightly news. ICAC is not without its flaws. Reputations have been trashed, evidentiary standards are quite different to the courts and prosecutions fall over. But it has been a force for good, serving as a bulwark against corruption and other behaviours. What is it about the Premier State that keeps taking on the sly? The “convict stain” is the place to start. “An unexplored continent would become a jail,” Robert Hughes wrote in The Fatal Shore, one of the largest forced exiles in modern history. British authorities hoped this scheme of “social goodness” eventually would swallow a whole class, “the criminal class”, he wrote, “whose existence was one of the prime sociological beliefs” of the age. To get ahead in this frontier society, amid its simmering colonial stew of jailers, convicts, emancipists, free settlers and local-born currency lads and lasses, corners were cut. There were grey zones. “You had to be street smart to survive let alone prosper,” says David Clune, for many years manager of the NSW Parliament’s research service and the parliament’s historian. “A good example is WC Wentworth’s father, D’Arcy. He was a highwayman in England who was very lucky to escape conviction. His aristocratic connections got rid of him to NSW where he prospered in dubious and not so dubious ways.” There was shame around that convict past, a raw wound that would last a very long time, as historian John Hirst observed of the world’s bad opinion of us. We were “morally suspect”, even though Australia had disowned that past with the anti- transportation movement in the 1840s. As a British verse of the time had it: “There vice is virtue, virtue vice / And all that’s vile is voted nice.” In a 2006 essay, Hirst noted how parliaments in the Australian colonies were “rough- houses” compared with Westminster, “and of all the Australian parliaments that of NSW had the lowest reputation”. A lot of disreputable men had gained seats, while proceedings in the Legislative Assembly, which become known as the “Bear Pit”, were a blood sport. Havelock Ellis, described as a priggish young Englishman, wrote in a 1875 diary entry how there were no orators in the NSW assembly, a “body of businessmen, merchants, shopkeepers and the like, met together to transact business”. Hirst noted the 1880s were the heyday of drunks and demagogues in the NSW lower house. In a Bulletin cartoon from the time, Hirst recounts, a man in a bowler hat approaches a man sitting on a park bench who is dressed in top hat and tails. “Excuse 3 me,” says the first man. “Are you a member of parliament?” “Certainly not,” replies the man in the top hat. “I am a gentleman.” In the years before World War I, Sydney became more upright, on the surface at least. In his introduction to the Oxford Anthology of Sydney, Richard Hall writes politics had a lot to do with the rise of suburban respectability. “The non-Labor parties merged in response to the rising threat of the ALP and formed an alliance with the wowser Protestant churches, whose price was social control through a raft of anti-liquor, anti- gambling, and Sunday observance laws,” Hall writes. “These laws were unenforceable and turned many of the population, mostly working class, into offenders. From then on the laws fed and entrenched police corruption and created widespread public acceptance of corruption underneath the facade.” Clune, who is now an honorary associate at the University of Sydney, tells Inquirer that because the Irish were excluded from mainstream society, they created their own alternative channels, similar to Tammany in the US. “So getting round the system by ‘rorts’ was an established part of the culture and was imported into the ALP, especially after the conscription split during the first world war when the English MPs left and the ‘Murphia’ took control,” he says. “Sydney, in US parlance, has always been a wide open town, like Kansas City, with plenty of opportunity to make money with few questions asked. NSW police have always been a law unto themselves. Politicians are afraid of them and seek to keep them on side. There has been traditionally little accountability and a culture of cover-up.” As well, Clune says the inflexibility of the public service for a long time created a culture of fixers who could get things done for a price — appealing to those fed up with bureaucracy. It still persists, with endless opportunities for graft at pressure points of a Byzantine system of development approvals in a state that has been pushing public works projects at a record rate. Criminals were often dealt with brutally by police or granted the “green light” to do as they pleased. Corruption was endemic, reaching high into the NSW police and politics. Robert Askin, Liberal premier from 1965 to 1975, presided over a vast network of corruption and bribery, meticulously detailed after his death. Askin was in criminal cahoots with Abe Saffron, Sydney’s “Mr Sin”, who provided kickbacks to his protectors. Saffron’s son would allege his father was the bagman for an underworld of illegal grog, prostitution and casinos, with bribes and payments trousered by Askin and police commissioner Norman “The Foreman” Allan. 4 Abe Saffron in the 1950s By the 1980s it seemed the whole country was in the grip of the NSW disease. The Fitzgerald inquiry uncovered decades of systematic graft in Queensland. WA Inc was in full swing. In A Concise History of Australia Stuart Macintyre noted a “discernible loss of public confidence in government”. Neville Wran’s corrective services minister Rex Jackson served time for selling early release to prisoners, while the state’s chief magistrate Murray Farquhar was jailed for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. “In NSW special deals for mates were a way of life and even embroiled a High Court judge,” Macintyre wrote of Lionel Murphy’s ordeal. “By the end of the decade a flurry of royal commissions sent some of the culprits to trial. Police commissioners, cabinet members and a premier all served prison sentences.” Out of this cesspit came the idealism, or was it sheer desperation, of ICAC and the establishment in 1994 of the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service conducted by James Wood. One of Wood’s legacies was a police integrity commission. At the time, a new Public Interest Disclosures Act made it easier for whistleblowers to come forward. Last year, NSW Ombudsman Michael Barnes reported a 30 per cent rise in public interest disclosures made, with corrupt conduct the most serious allegation made in 83 per cent of cases. Is that evidence of more corruption or vigilance? NSW officials have a duty to report serious wrongdoing. ICAC itself has been through waves of change following reviews, moving to a three- commissioner model in August 2017. A sore point for many remains the trashing of reputations in hearings and limited avenues for exoneration. A consequence may be, as ICAC’s inspector Bruce McClintock told a NSW parliamentary inquiry last year, “people with the appropriate skills and abilities will be discouraged from coming into parliament and engaging in politics, if they feel they could be dealt with in this way”. When Greiner introduced the ICAC Act he told parliament “the commission will be required to make definite findings about persons directly and substantially involved”. “The commission will not be able to simply allow such persons’ reputations to be impugned publicly by allegations without coming to some definite conclusion,” he 5 vowed.
Recommended publications
  • Inaugural Speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith
    Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to thank officers from both Houses for their comments on a draft of this paper, in particular Stephanie Hesford and Jonathan Elliott from the Legislative Assembly and Stephen Frappell and Samuel Griffith from the Legislative Council. Thanks, too, to Lenny Roth and Greig Tillotson for their comments and advice. Any errors are the author’s responsibility. ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 978 0 7313 1900 8 May 2013 © 2013 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior consent from the Manager, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament by Gareth Griffith NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Manager, Politics & Government/Law .......................................... (02) 9230 2356 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Acting Senior Research Officer, Law ............................................ (02) 9230 3085 Lynsey Blayden (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ................................................................. (02) 9230 3085 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Social Issues/Law ........................................... (02) 9230 2484 Jack Finegan (BA (Hons), MSc), Research Officer, Environment/Planning..................................... (02) 9230 2906 Daniel Montoya (BEnvSc (Hons), PhD), Research Officer, Environment/Planning ..................................... (02) 9230 2003 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics ...................................................... (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Gina Rinehart 2. Anthony Pratt & Family • 3. Harry Triguboff
    1. Gina Rinehart $14.02billion from Resources Chairman – Hancock Prospecting Residence: Perth Wealth last year: $20.01b Rank last year: 1 A plunging iron ore price has made a big dent in Gina Rinehart’s wealth. But so vast are her mining assets that Rinehart, chairman of Hancock Prospecting, maintains her position as Australia’s richest person in 2015. Work is continuing on her $10billion Roy Hill project in Western Australia, although it has been hit by doubts over its short-term viability given falling commodity prices and safety issues. Rinehart is pressing ahead and expects the first shipment late in 2015. Most of her wealth comes from huge royalty cheques from Rio Tinto, which mines vast swaths of tenements pegged by Rinehart’s late father, Lang Hancock, in the 1950s and 1960s. Rinehart's wealth has been subject to a long running family dispute with a court ruling in May that eldest daughter Bianca should become head of the $5b family trust. 2. Anthony Pratt & Family $10.76billion from manufacturing and investment Executive Chairman – Visy Residence: Melbourne Wealth last year: $7.6billion Rank last year: 2 Anthony Pratt’s bet on a recovering United States economy is paying off. The value of his US-based Pratt Industries has surged this year thanks to an improving manufacturing sector and a lower Australian dollar. Pratt is also executive chairman of box maker and recycling business Visy, based in Melbourne. Visy is Australia’s largest private company by revenue and the biggest Australian-owned employer in the US. Pratt inherited the Visy leadership from his late father Richard in 2009, though the firm’s ownership is shared with sisters Heloise Waislitz and Fiona Geminder.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006–07
    annual report 2006–07 CEDA Level 5, 136 Exhibition Street Melbourne 3000 Australia Telephone: (03) 9662 3544 Fax: (03) 9663 7271 Email: [email protected] Web: ceda.com.au About this publication Annual Report 2006–07 © CEDA 2007 ISSN 1832-8822 This publication is available on CEDA’s website: ceda.com.au For an emailed or printed copy, please contact the national office on 03 9662 3544 or [email protected] Design: Robyn Zwar Graphic Design Photography: Sean Davey/BRW, iStockphoto, Jason McCormack, Paul Lovelace Photography, Photonet, Yusuke Sato contents What is CEDA? ...............................................................2 Chairman’s report...........................................................4 CEO’s report...................................................................5 Review of operations......................................................6 Membership .............................................................7 Research ...............................................................12 Events.....................................................................16 International activity.................................................23 Communications ....................................................25 Governance..................................................................28 Concise financial report................................................34 Overview.................................................................35 Directors’ report ......................................................38 Income statement....................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • The Sydney Morning Herald's Linton Besser and the Incomparable
    Exposed: Obeids' secret harbour deal Date May 19, 2012 Linton Besser, Kate McClymont The former ALP powerbroker Eddie Obeid hid his interests in a lucrative cafe strip. Moses Obeid. Photo: Kate Geraghty FORMER minister Eddie Obeid's family has controlled some of Circular Quay's most prominent publicly-owned properties by hiding its interests behind a front company. A Herald investigation has confirmed that Mr Obeid and his family secured the three prime cafes in 2003 and that for his last nine years in the upper house he failed to inform Parliament about his family's interest in these lucrative government leases. Quay Eatery, Wharf 5. Photo: Mick Tsikas For the first time, senior officials and former cabinet ministers Carl Scully and Eric Roozendaal have confirmed Mr Obeid's intervention in the lease negotiations for the quay properties, including seeking favourable conditions for the cafes, which the Herald can now reveal he then secretly acquired. Crucially, when the former NSW treasurer Michael Costa had charge of the waterfront, he put a stop to a public tender scheduled for 2005 that might have threatened the Obeids' control over two of the properties. Mr Obeid was the most powerful player inside the NSW Labor Party for the past two decades, and was described in 2009 by the deposed premier Nathan Rees as the party's puppet-master. Eddie Obeid. Photo: Jon Reid The Arc Cafe, Quay Eatery and Sorrentino, which are located in blue-ribbon positions on or next to the bustling ferry wharves at the quay, are all run by a $1 company called Circular Quay Restaurants Pty Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: a Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478
    Department of the Parliamentary Library INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES •~J..>t~)~.J&~l<~t~& Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478 © Copyright Commonwealth ofAustralia 1999 Except to the exteot of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribntion to Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced,the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian govermnent document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staffbut not with members ofthe public. , ,. Published by the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, 1999 INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES , Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants Professor John Warhurst Consultant, Politics and Public Administration Group , 29 June 1999 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the considerable help that I was given in producing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Briefings: - Barry O’Farrell MP, NSW Leader of the Opposition: Thursday 27Th May 2010
    Political Briefings: - Barry O’Farrell MP, NSW Leader of the Opposition: Thursday 27th May 2010 1) Libertarian and Progressive Conservatism: Concept/Strategy as stated to Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, Julie Bishop MP, re Chief of Staff emails in late 2009 for then Federal Leader of Opposition, Malcolm Turnbull MP. 2) Tailored Policies/Programmes: Obviously the Federal and NSW political, economic, social and cultural circumstances are different or at least not exactly the same. Sydney’s “regionalism” has historical peculiarities as the “founding city” of the nation. Sydney always looked to the Mother Country, UK, and its colonial “off-shoots: in Tasmania, Victoria, New Zealand and Queensland, and through them to the Pacific Islands in the South West Pacific. NSW was predominantly Free Trade in persepective rather than Protectionist as in Victoria. 3) Political Parties in New South Wales: The ALP – since Sir William McKell MP, Premier 1941-47 a) McKell to Renshaw - Premiers 1941-65 b) Wran and Unsworth – Premiers 1976-88 c) Carr to Keneally – Premiers 1995-2011 The Liberal Party – since Sir Robert Askin MP, Premier 1965-75 a) Pre WW11 – Bertram Stevens 1932-39 b) The Bob Askin years - a decade of alleged “corruption”. c) Greiner and Fahey – 1988-1995 4) Barry O’Farrell – State Leader of the Opposition: a) Comment by Nick Greiner: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/election-is-the-only-opinion-poll-that- matters/story-e6frg6zo-1225869365983 b) The Rudd/Abbott contest for PM -2010 c) Three/four terms of ‘Good” Liberal Party Government – 2011/27 5) ACCCI Interests a) NSW is “in” the Trade Business – Ministry for Foreign Economic Relations b) Greater Sydney as a World City – one Mayor, many Deputies.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul O'grady Interviewer: John Witte Focus O
    Pride History Group Oral History Interview Interviewee: Paul O’Grady Interviewer: John Witte Focus of interview: Activism Date of interview: Commenced 7th July 2012 Place of interview: Eastwood and Bar Beach, Newcastle Conditions: None Time Subjects Proper names Italics = Contribution by interviewer John Witte, [Square brackets] = John Witte’s assumption of what Paul meant. 00:00 Paul’s early childhood. St Mary’s Rydalmere; St Patrick’s Dundas; 00:48 Father’s occupation and mum’s role in the family. Parramatta; 01:22 Family politics. Dan Mahoney; 02:21 Attitude towards school. St Patricks was “free ranging”. Left School in St Patricks year 10. School did not engage him. 03:13 Job in local supermarket. Rydalmere; 03:30 Sexuality. Ideas and discussion in the home. St Vincents Hospital; 04:35 Life away from home, the neighbourhood. 05:25 Left home at 16 and lived in a gay relationship. Parramatta; 06:49 He met his partner in the Labor Party. Australian Labor Party; 07:06 First meeting in ALP in November or December 1975. Reasons he joined the ALP. He knew the Branch Secretary prior to joining. 07:55 Partner also from a Catholic background. 08:20 Joining the trade union movement. The union he joined was under attack Shop Branch, Australian from the Federally registered union. His union was talking about Workers’ Union; Shop amalgamating with another union. The Federal body raided his union’s Distributive and Allied membership and he tells how this happened. Employees Association; Building Workers Industrial Union; 09:10 He was a union organiser during this.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report on Trends in Police Corruption
    COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 Parliament House Macquarie Street Sydney 2000 Tel: (02) 9230 2737 Fax: (02) 9230 3309 ISBN 0 7347 6899 0 Table Of Contents COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP .........................................................................................................i CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD..........................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – A TYPOLOGY OF POLICE CORRUPTION........................................................ 3 1.1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF POLICING AND ETHICS LITERATURE.............................................................. 3 1.2 DEFINING POLICE CORRUPTION.............................................................................................. 6 1.3 ROTTEN APPLE VS ROTTEN BARREL ...................................................................................... 10 1.4 CYCLES OF CORRUPTION.................................................................................................... 12 1.5 CORRUPTION – AN ETHICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEM?....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neville Wran. Australian Biographical Monographs No. 5, by David Clune
    158 Neville Wran. Australian Biographical Monographs No. 5, by David Clune. Cleveland (Qld): Connor Court Publishing, 2020. pp. 80, Paperback RRP $19.95 ISBN: 9781922449092 Elaine Thompson Former Associate Professor, University of New South Wales. It’s been many years since I’ve thought about Neville Wran, so I came to this monograph with an oPen mind, limited by two Personal judgements. The first was the belief that Wran was a giant of his time, a real leader and moderniser. The second was the tragedy (farce) of his last years. It was a reminder to us all that there are no guarantees that a great life will be rewarded with a kind death: for Neville Wran that was certainly not the case. Luckily, now with time we remember his leadershiP, his modernising Policies and his largely successful ability to dominate an extraordinarily Powerful Political Party with its deeP factions. David Clune’s monograph, through the use of first-hand materials and comments from Wran’s colleagues, takes us through Wran’s rise to Power, his successes as Premier and his fall via the web of corruPtion and scandal that ended his Premiership. Clune’s narrative is clear and remarkably free of value-judgements. It reminds us just how moribund the Politics and Parliament of NSW were at the time leading uP to Wran’s Government and of all the talent Wran brought with him, which transformed NSW Politics, Policy and Parliament. Of course, there were failures; things left incomPlete and the embedded corruPt culture of NSW Politics largely ignored. Nonetheless, in this monograph we gain a Picture of an extraordinary man leading Australia (via NSW) into the modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    22912 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Wednesday 19 May 2010 __________ The President (The Hon. Amanda Ruth Fazio) took the chair at 2.00 p.m. The President read the Prayers. APPROPRIATION (BUDGET VARIATIONS) BILL 2010 WEAPONS AND FIREARMS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010 Bills received from the Legislative Assembly. Leave granted for procedural matters to be dealt with on one motion without formality. Motion by the Hon. Tony Kelly agreed to: That the bills be read a first time and printed, standing orders be suspended on contingent notice for remaining stages and the second readings of the bills be set down as orders of the day for a later hour of the sitting. Bills read a first time and ordered to be printed. Second readings set down as orders of the day for a later hour. PRIVILEGES COMMITTEE Report: Citizen’s Right of Reply (Mrs J Passas) Motion by the Hon. Kayee Griffin agreed to: That the House adopt the report. Pursuant to standing orders the response of Mrs J. Passas was incorporated. ______ Reply to comments by the Hon Amanda Fazio MLC in the Legislative Council on 18 June 2009 I would like to reply to comments made by the Hon Amanda Fazio MLC on 18 June 2009 in the Legislative Council about myself. Ms Fazio makes two accusations, which adversely affect my reputation: That I am "an absolute lunatic"; and That apart from "jumping on the bandwagon of a genuine community campaign for easy access" at Summer Hill railway station, I did not have anything to do with securing the easy access upgrade at Summer Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    5243 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Wednesday 25 September 2002 ______ The President (The Hon. Dr Meredith Burgmann) took the chair at 11.00 a.m. The President offered the Prayers. DISTINGUISHED VISITORS The PRESIDENT: I welcome into the President's gallery the Ambassador for The Netherlands, Dr Hans Sondaal, and Mrs Els Sondaal and the Consul General of The Netherlands, Madelien de Planque. FARM DEBT MEDIATION AMENDMENT BILL CRIMES (ADMINISTRATION OF SENTENCES) FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY SERVICES AMENDMENT (INTERSTATE ARRANGEMENTS) BILL Bills received and read a first time. Motion by the Hon. Michael Egan agreed to: That standing orders be suspended to allow the passing of the bills through all is remaining stages during the present or any one sitting of the House. LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT AMENDMENT BILL Message received from the Legislative Assembly agreeing to the Legislative Council's amendments. AUDIT OFFICE Report The President tabled, in accordance with the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983, the performance audit report entitled "e-government: Electronic Procurement of Hospital Supplies" dated September 2002. Ordered to be printed. TABLING OF PAPERS The Hon. Carmel Tebbutt tabled the following papers: (1) Bank Mergers (Application of Laws) Act 1996—Treasurer's Report on the Statutory Five Year Review, dated September 2002. (2) Bank Mergers Act 1996—Treasurer's Report on the Statutory Report on the Statutory Five Year Review, dated September 2002. Ordered to be printed. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Withdrawal of Business Business of the House Notice of Motion No. 1, withdrawn by the Hon. Richard Jones. 5244 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 25 September 2002 BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders Motion by the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust and Political Behaviour Jonathan O’Dea1 Member for Davidson in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly
    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Trust and Political Behaviour Jonathan O’Dea1 Member for Davidson in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly INTRODUCTION: THE DECLINE IN TRUST Trust is the most important asset in politics. Trust can generate community and business confidence, leading to economic growth and improved political success for an incumbent government. The more a government is trusted, the more people and business will generally spend and invest, boosting the economy. People are also more likely to pay their taxes and comply with regulations if they trust government. Trust promotes a social environment of optimism, cohesion and national prosperity. When trust is lost, it is difficult to win back. Where it is eroded, a general malaise can develop that is destructive to the essential fabric of society and operation of democracy. Unfortunately, in Australia and internationally, there has been a growing erosion of trust in politicians and in politics. People are losing trust in institutions including governments, charities, churches, media outlets and big businesses. In a recent Essential Poll, 45 percent of those surveyed said they had no trust in political parties, 29 percent had no trust in state parliaments and 32 percent had no trust in federal Parliament.2 Since 1969, when Australians were first surveyed about their trust in politicians, the proportion of voters saying government in Australia could be trusted has fallen from 51 percent to just 26 percent in 2016, while the number of voters who believe ‘people in government look after themselves’ has increased from 49 percent to 75 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference held in Brisbane on 18-20 July 2018.
    [Show full text]