DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Menhaden Draft Amendment 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Menhaden Draft Amendment 3 Atlantic Menhaden Draft Amendment 3 September 2017 Public Hearing Agenda • Overview of ASMFC • Amendment Timeline • Management Issues and Alternatives • Public Comment ASMFC • Comprised of 15 Atlantic Coast states • Atl. Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Mgmt. Act (1993) • Regulatory authority in state waters • Quarterly Board meetings • Three commissioners, one state, one vote Vision Statement: Sustainably Managing Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Timeline May 2016 – Mar - July Aug Aug – Nov Feb 2017 2017 2017 Oct 2017 2017 PID X Write X Draft Amendment 3 Approve Draft Amendment 3 for X Public Comment Public Comment X Final Action X Final Action Draft Amendment 3 November 13-14, 2017 BWI Marriot 1743 West Nursery Road, Linthicum Heights, MD Mgmt. Issues in Draft Amd. 3 • Reference Points • Quota Allocation and Timeframes • Quota Transfers • Quota Rollovers • Incidental Catch & Small Scale Fishery Allowance • Episodic Events Set Aside Program • Chesapeake Bay Reduction Fishery Cap Reference Points • Reference points measure health of stock and inform the TAC setting process (size of pie) • Menhaden serve an important ecological role – Prey for larger fish, birds, marine mammals • Board initiated Draft Amd. 3 to consider the application of ecosystem reference points (ERPs) to menhaden – Assess status of menhaden in regard to their interactions with predator species • 3 categories of reference points – Single-species reference points – Menhaden-specific ERPs – Ecosystem guidelines for forage fish • Varied advice on how to manage forage fish 1. Single Species Reference Points Stock currently managed by single-species reference points – Look at abundance of menhaden alone Pros – Calculated from the stock assessment model which accounts for natural mortality – Assumptions and parameters specific to menhaden Cons – Unclear if natural mortality alone adequately accounts for menhaden’s ecological services 2. Menhaden Specific ERPs Currently developing menhaden-specific ERPs which consider the abundance of menhaden and predator species – Evaluating a suite of multi-species models to analyze menhaden prey-predator relationships Pros – Consider menhaden’s ecological role as forage fish – Assumptions and parameters are specific to menhaden Cons – Menhaden specific ERPs are not currently available; it is expected that they will be peer-reviewed in 2019 and can be implemented in 2020 3. Ecosystem Guidelines for Forage Fish Guidelines for managing forage fish species in general, specifically looking at their ecological role – Generalized rules based on studies which look at multiple regions, ecosystems, and species Pros – Provide general rules regarding the management of forage fish in relation to predator abundance – Available for use today Cons – Guidelines are not specific to menhaden and, as a result, make generalizations which may not be applicable Reference Points Option A: Single Species Reference Points • Development of ERPs would not be pursued Option B: Continue to Develop Menhaden- Specific ERPs with Interim Use of Single Species Reference Points Reference Points Option C: Continue to Develop Menhaden-Specific ERPs with Interim Use of Hockey Stick Control Rule (Ecosystem Guideline for Forage Fish) Max fishing rate at 100% unfished biomass If biomass less than 40% unfished Where we biomass, are now fishing stops Reference Points Option D: Continue to Develop Menhaden-Specific ERPs with Interim Use of 75% Rule of Thumb • Ecosystem guideline for forage fish • Recommends a fishing mortality rate that achieves 75% unfished biomass Option E: Continue to Develop Menhaden-Specific ERPs with Interim Use of 75% Target, 40% Threshold • Ecosystem guideline for forage fish • Recommends a target fishing mortality rate that achieves 75% unfished biomass and threshold mortality rate that achieves 40% unfished biomass Reference Points Threshold = when action is triggered to reduce fishing Target= where we manage to Reference Points Reference Points Reference Points Reference Points Quota Allocation • Allocation: How do we divide the pie? • Currently divide TAC between states based on landings from 2009-2011 – Concern the allocation method may not strike a balance between gear types and regions – Concern historical catch could limit states with minimal quota from participating in growing fishery Quota Allocation & Timeframes Allocation Methods Allocation Timeframes A. Coastwide A. 2009-2011 B. Jurisdictional B. 2012-2016 C. Fixed Minimum C. 1985-2016 D. Regional Fleet D. 1985-1995 Capacity E. Weighted E. Disposition F. Allocation Based on TAC Level Allocation Timeframes • Option A: 2009-2011 – Current timeframe/ status quo • Option B: 2012-2016 – Most recent timeframe • Option C: 1985-2016 – Longest timeframe • Option D: 1985-1995 – Most historic timeframe • Option E: Weighted Allocation – 50% weighting between 2012-2016 and 1985-1995 Coastwide Allocation • No division of the TAC TAC Jurisdictional Allocation TAC divided among the states (Table 2) Fixed Minimum Allocation • TAC divided among the states; however, each jurisdiction gets a minimum % of quota (Tables 3a-c) – Sub-option 1: 0.5% minimum – Sub-option 2: 1% minimum – Sub-option 3: 2% minimum • Annually, a state can chose to forgo its quota entirely or retain 10,000 lbs for bycatch • Relinquished quota is re-distributed 1% Fixed Minimum (Table 3b) Regional Fleet Capacity Divide the TAC by gear types… • Large Fleet (purse seine, pair trawl) vs. Small Fleet (all others) …and then divide by regions • ME-CT vs. NY-DE vs. MD-FL Table 4 Regional Fleet Capacity Option for a soft cap for the small fleet • Sets a target quota for the small gears but doesn’t subject them to a closure • Small gears accounts for <6% of landings in the fishery • Advantages: provides flexibility, minimizes discards, minimizes economic impacts, relieves administrative burden, • Disadvantages: small-scale fleet could exceed target quota Sub-option 1: There are no soft caps Sub-option 2: Small-capacity fleet operates under a soft cap and there is a 25,000 pound trip limit per day Dispositional Allocation • TAC divided between the reduction and bait/other fisheries Reduction Bait/Other Sub-option 1 75% 25% Sub-option 2 70% 30% • The bait allocation can be further divided by jurisdiction, gear type, region, or through a fixed minimum approach (Tables 5b-i) Allocation Based on TAC Level – Sub-Option 1: If the TAC is greater than 212,500 mt, the difference is allocated such that the reduction fishery gets 50% and the other 50% is distributed to state bait fisheries (Table 6a) – Sub-Option 2: If the TAC is greater than 212,500 mt, the difference is allocated such that the reduction fishery gets 30% and the other 70% is distributed to state bait fisheries (Table 6b) Quota Transfers • Quota transfers are a useful way to move unused quota between states or regions – Quota overage, safe harbor landings • Challenges with quota transfers include: – Possibility for states to perpetually exceed quota and address through transfers – Administrative burden of program • Building off of Amendment 2, there may be ways to build-in accountability measures or streamline the process Quota Transfers Option A: Quota Transfers Permitted (Status quo) • Two or more states can transfer menhaden quota Option B: Quota Transfers w/ Accountability Measures • If state/region exceeds its quota by more than 5% in two consecutive years, it cannot receive a quota transfer in the third year Option C: Quota Reconciliation • If TAC is not exceeded, state/regional quota overages are automatically forgiven • If TAC is exceeded, any unused quota is pooled and equally distributed to states/regions with an overage. Any remaining overage is then deducted from the subsequent year Quota Rollovers • Quota rollovers approved in Amd. 2 if stock is not overfished and overfishing is not occurring – In 2012, stock did not meet this criteria so details of program were not specified • Board agreed to address quota rollovers in Amd. 3 Option A: No Quota Rollovers Option B: 10% Total Quota Rollover – Example: If quota is 1 million pounds, can roll over up to 100,000 pounds of unused quota Option C: 5% Total Quota Rollover – Example: If quota is 1 million pounds, can roll over up to 50,000 pounds of unused quota Option D: 50% Unused Quota Rollover – Example: If quota is 1 million pounds and 400,000 pounds are unused, up to 200,000 pounds can be rolled over Incidental Catch & Small Scale Fishery • Amd. 2 established a bycatch allowance of 6,000 lbs per vessel/trip for non-directed fisheries – 12,000 lbs for two individuals fishing from 1 vessel • Challenges with the current provision: – Landings under the bycatch provision do not count towards the TAC – No definition of ‘bycatch’ or ‘non-directed fisheries’ – Concern the bycatch allowance supports a small- scale fishery rather than incidental catch • Amd. 3 looks to address these challenges Incidental Catch Stationary Multi- Small Scale Gears Non-Directed Gears Species Gears (SMSG) Cast nets Pound nets Pound nets Bait nets Anchored gillnets Anchored/staked Traps/pots Drift gillnet gillnet Haul seines Fishing weir Fishing weirs Fyke nets Fyke nets Floating fish traps Hook-n-line Floating fish trap Fyke nets Bag nets Hoop nets Trammel nets Incidental Catch *In Below Options, Incidental Catch Not Included in TAC* Option A: Trip Limit for Non-Directed Gears – 6,000/12,000 lb per trip Option B: Trip Limit for Non-Directed & Small Scale Gears – 6,000/12,000 lb per trip Option C: Catch Cap and Trigger – Maintain 6,000/12,000 lb trip limit –
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia
    Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2001 Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2002 Published by ICLARM – The World Fish Center, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960 Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), S-105 25 (Office: Sveavagen 20, Stockholm), Stockholm, Sweden. Torell, M. and A.M. Salamanca, Editors. 1997. Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia. ICLARM Technical Report 60, 212p. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Cataloguing in Publication Data Institutional issues and perspectives in the management of fisheries and coastal resources in Southeast Asia/ editors Magnus Torell, Albert M. Salamanca. ISBN 983-2346-07-X 1. Fisheries—management – Asia Southeastern. 2. Marine resources—Asia, Southeastern. I. Torell, Magnus. II. Salamanca, Albert M. 639.20959 Managing editors: Sandra Child, Peter R Gardiner and Janet-Maychin Copyeditors: Terrence Clayton and Albert M Salamanca Indexer: Barry Howarth Layout and design: Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover concept: Albert M Salamanca Cover design: Sam Studio Graphics and Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover: Diverse uses of the coastal zone. ISBN 983-2346-07-X ICLARM –The World Fish Center Contribution No. 1654 Printed by Sun Printers Sdn Bhd, Malaysia ICLARM-The World Fish Center is one of the 16 international research centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) that has initiated the public awareness campaign, Future Harvest. Contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at Site 35Ti90, Tillamook, Oregon
    DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Findings: + (35TI90) County: Tillamook T/R/S: Section 25, T1S, R10W, WM Quad/Date: Tillamook, OR (1985) Project Type: Site Damage Assessment, Testing, Data Recovery, Monitoring New Prehistoric 0 Historic 0 Isolate 0 Archaeological Permit Nos.: AP-964, -1055, -1191 Curation Location: Oregon State Museum of Natural and Cultural History under Accession Number 1739 DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. Prepared for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, OR 97201 February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Archaeological Investigations at Site 35TI90, Tillamook, Oregon ABSTRACT Between April 2007 and October 2009, Applied Archaeological Research, Inc. (AAR) conducted multiple phases of archaeological investigations at the part of site 35TI90 located in the area of potential effects related to the city of Tillamook’s upgrade and expansion of its wastewater treatment plant (TWTP) located along the Trask River at the western edge of the city. Archaeological investigations described in this report include evaluative test excavations, a site damage assessment, three rounds of data recovery, investigations related to an inadvertent discovery, and archaeological monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enforcement of Federal Fisheries Regulations in British Columbia and the Resistance of Native Fishers, 1894-1916
    'AND THEN WE WILL MIND THE LAW1: THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE RESISTANCE OF NATIVE FISHERS, 1894-1916 Jos C. Dyck B.A. Hons., Carleton University, 1991 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of HISTORY O Jos C. Dyck 1994 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY December 1994 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME Jos C. Dyck DEGREE TITLE 'And then we will mind the law': The Enforcement of Federal Fisheries Regulations in B.C. and the Resistance of Native Fishers, 1894-1914 EXAMINING COMMITTEE: Chair Derryl MacLean Doug Cole, Professor -. Hugh Johnston, Professor Robert Galois, ph ,D . Examiner Date: 9 December 1994 i i PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay 'And then we will mind the law': The Enforcement of Federal Fisheries Regulations in B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NOOTKA SOUND BULLETIN #1A Date: July 12, 2006 Historical
    NOOTKA SOUND BULLETIN #1a Date: July 12, 2006 FORECAST: There is no pre season chinook forecast specifically for the Conuma system. The Forecast for Robertson Creek can only be used as a guideline for Nootka Sound Forecasts. In the next bulletin there will be a revised version of the Robertson Forecast that can be applied to Nootka Sound. Historical Escapement: Chinook Coho Stream 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Burman 212 107 472 768 2636 642 750 477 326 1719 2252 2513 Conuma 9970 16468 27376 34653 41053 6985 10339 10445 10051 4851 Not Ins 1989 Tahsis 1320 389 758 762 905 182 3414 767 587 673 1860 1096 Zeballos 200 100 148 69 393 88 75 200 528 310 130 75 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION and HEAD RECOVERY: Over the last 2 weeks we have been visiting Lodges throughout Nootka Sound promoting better head recovery. This year no Conuma Coho clipped fish will be returning and only 4 and 5 year Chinook will have CWT’s. Biological samples will be taken from the sport fishery and the Commercial GN fishery. Special emphasis will be put into sample fish from the Camel Rock area to investigate concerns that a high number of Gold and Burman fish may reside there. Results to be fanned out when they are completed. HATCHERY UPDATE: System Conuma Burman Tahsis Gold Muchalaht Sucwoa Tlupana 2006 Chinook Egg Targets 2.1 million 500,000 250,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 All chinook will be thermally marked but not Coded wire tagged (ad clipped).
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Coast Traditional Salmon. Fisheries Systems
    NORTHWEST COAST TRADITIONAL SALMON. FISHERIES SYSTEMS OF RESOURCE UTILIZATION by PATRICIA ANN BERRINGER B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1974 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Anthropology & Sociology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 1982 (c) Patricia Ann Berringer In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Anthropology & Sociology The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 October 18, 1982 e - ii - Abstract The exploitation of salmon resources was once central to the economic life of the Northwest Coast. The organization of technological skills and information brought to the problems of salmon utilization by Northwest Coast fishermen was directed to obtaining sufficient calories to meet the requirements of staple storage foods and fresh consumption. This study reconstructs selective elements of the traditional salmon fishery drawing on data from the ethnographic record, journals, and published observations of the period prior to intensive white settlement. To serve the objective of an ecological perspective, technical references to the habitat and distribution of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus sp.) are included.
    [Show full text]
  • Imatem A2021n15p243.Pdf (2.256Mb)
    FISHING THE THAMES ESTUARY IN THE LATER MIDDLE AGES: ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY AND THE METROPOLITAN MARKET FOR FISH C. 1250-1550 JAMES A. GALLOWAY INDEPENDENT SCHOLAR IRELAND Date of receipt: 6th of September, 2019 Date of acceptance: 9th of October, 2019 ABSTRACT The estuary and tidal river of the Thames in south-eastern England were home to active commercial fisheries in the later middle ages. Despite conflicts over navigation, especially related to the use of fixed fish-weirs, the estuary supplied large quantities of fish to the London market. The importance of Thames fish to Londoners’ diet emerges from documentary and archaeological evidence. These fisheries remained important throughout the period 1250-1550 and were not destroyed by the rise of large-scale trade in preserved fish from more distant waters. KEYWORDS Thames Estuary, Fishing, Coastal Environment, Medieval London, Diet. CAPITALIA VERBA Aestuarium Tamesis, Piscatio, Circumiecta litoralia, Londinium Mediaevale, Diaeta. IMAGO TEMPORIS. MEDIUM AEVUM, XV (2021): 243-271 / ISSN 1888-3931 / DOI 10.21001/itma.2021.15.08 243 244 JAMES A. GALLOWAY ILLUSTRATION 1. THE THAMES ESTUARY: LOCATION MAP. NOTE: AREAS OF ALLUVIAL MARSHLAND ARE SHOWN IN GREEN. MAP PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR. English inshore and estuarine fisheries1 have received much less attention from historians than the commercial sea fisheries of the high and later Middle Ages, which have been the subject of a number of important studies in recent decades.2 The most notable exception is Harold Fox’s pioneering study of the south Devon coast, which includes consideration of all aspects of fishing practice in that south- western county.3 The present paper attempts a less ambitious overview of the later medieval exploitation of the fisheries of the estuary of the River Thames in south- eastern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii; I~ I~: I~ ; ; I~ ~:: It J: ~ ~I; ~ I: ~~: December 1963 Washington , D
    CiJ ti~ iii; i~ i~: I~ ; ; I~ ~:: it J: ~ ~i; ~ I: ~~: December 1963 Washington , D. C. Vol. 25, No. 12 AN ELECTROMECHAN ICAL FISHING AND COUNTING FENCE U SED IN IRELAND Julius Rockwell, Jr .,~ ABSTRACT On Ireland's River Shannon salmon are fished by a large pennanent weir which contains fish traps. The weir extends across the river and a carefully regulated es­ capement is counted through at frequent intervals during the entire run. Electric counting devices are used to count the escapement and electric shocking devices are used to kill the fish taken. INTRODUCTION Salmon are permitted to escape to upriver fisheries and spawning, and a regulated per­ centage is then killed electrically after being caught in stationary traps in the River Shannon at Thomond near the southwest coast of Ireland. This installation of the Electricity Supply Board of Ireland is of particular interest because the most effective regulation of a salmon stock is possible when the escapement to an individual river can be carefully controlled. The principle of controlled fishing of the river mouth is similar to one employed by the Soviets and described previously in Commercial Fisheries Review, July 1957 p. 32. The fence or weir of this Shannon fishery extends completely across the river and con­ tains traps in which are electric fishing or electric fish-counting equipment. The river at Thomond is moderately large being in the order of 180-300 cubic meters per second. The annual run to the Shannon has been estimated to be 20,000 salmon a year of which approximately 13,000 reach the weir.
    [Show full text]
  • Lolo Creek Permanent Weir and Fish Trapping Facility
    BONNEVILLEPOWERADMINISTRATION In cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Lolo Creek Permanent Weir and Fish Trapping Facility Preliminary Environmental Assessment January 2013 DOE/EA-1895 DOI-BLM-ID-C020-2012-0021-EA Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Need for Action ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purposes ........................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 BPA Purposes ..................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2 BLM Purposes .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Northwest Power and Conservation Council Process ......................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Federal Columbia Power System Biological Opinion ........................................ 1-3 1.3.3 Spring Chinook Supplementation ....................................................................... 1-4 1.3.4 Special Designations ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Existing Conditions at the Lower Lolo Weir Site ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Weir a Culturally Relevant STEM Activity
    The Fish Weir A Culturally Relevant STEM Activity by Anne Kern, Melinda A. Howard, Aimee Navickis Brasch, Fritz Fiedler, and Jillian Cadwell urriculum and instructional strategies that are The Fish Weir Engineering Challenge described in personally meaningful are key to engaging stu- this article provides one example of how cultural and Cdents from diverse ethnic and cultural back- historical STEM practices can be integrated into science grounds. A “one size fits all” approach to curriculum and engineering lessons for Native American students. development does not always translate to accessible Although we discuss this lesson in specific context to education for many students, particularly in science, Native American students, it can be adapted to meet technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) ed- other cultures or curricular goals. Fish weirs are an an- ucation (Lynch 2001). Meaningful and relevant activi- cient technology used around the globe for centuries ties that demonstrate a direct application of STEM to in places including Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. the lives of students or their communities can increase These traps were built from rocks, pilings, or wooden engagement in STEM (Jarosz 2003). Specifically, stu- posts that are designed to direct the movement of fish in dents are more likely to relate to instructional activi- streams or tidal waters. While all fish weirs maintain the ties that draw on historical references, descriptions, goal of directing and trapping fish, they are specifically examples, and analogies related to their communities. designed to meet the unique conditions of their land- For example, Native American students have been tra- scape and water bodies and the biology of the fish they ditionally marginalized in STEM education, yet tribes catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Allan T. Scholz Papers Regional History 1965 Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America Dietrich Treide Leipzig University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/scholz Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Treide, Dietrich, "Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America" (1965). Allan T. Scholz Papers. 1. https://dc.ewu.edu/scholz/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Regional History at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Allan T. Scholz Papers by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Publication of the Leipzig Museum of Ethnography: Issue 14 Die Organisierung des indianischen Lachsfangs im westlichen Nordamerika [Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America] By: Dietrich Treide Akademie-Verlag Berlin 1965 [Copyright owned by: State Ethnographic Collections Saxony (SES)/State Art Collections Dresden (SKD). Permission was granted by the copyright owner for placement of this German to English translation of Treide’s dissertation on the Eastern Washington University, JFK Library, Digital Commons Website] Translation by: Jaimie Kenney Department of Entomology University of California, Riverside Riverside, California 92521 Foreword by: Allan T. Scholz, Ph.D. Eastern Washington University Department of Biology 258 Science Building Cheney, WA
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Act CAP
    LAWS OF KENYA FISHERIES ACT CHAPTER 378 Revised Edition 2012 [1991] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012] CAP. 378 Fisheries CHAPTER 378 FISHERIES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I – PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II – ADMINISTRATION 3. Director. 4. Fisheries development measures. 5. Fisheries management measures. 6. Limitation of fishing. PART III – REGISTRATION OF FISHING VESSELS 7. Registration of fishing vessels. PART IV – LICENSING PROVISIONS General Licensing Provisions 8. General licensing provisions. Licensing of Local Fishing Vessels 9. Local fishing vessel licence. 10. Validity of local fishing vessel licence. Licensing of Foreign Fishing Vessels 11. Fishing and entry into Kenya fishery waters by foreign fishing vessels. 12. Issue of foreign fishing vessel licence. 13. Validity of foreign fishing vessel licence. Other Licences 14. Other Licences. PART V – OFFENCES AND ENFORCEMENT 15. Prohibited methods of fishing. 16. Receiving fish in respect of which offence has been committed. 17. Obstruction of officers. 18. Powers of officers. 19. Forfeiture. 20. Compounding of offences. PART VI – GENERAL PROVISIONS 21. Power to act as public prosecutor. 22. Marine mammals. 3 [Issue 1] CAP. 378 [Rev. 2012] Fisheries Section 23. Minister’s power to make regulations. 24. Schemes of loans to fishermen. 25. Repeal of Cap. 378, Cap. 379, Cap. 380 and revocation of Groups 20 and 21 of United Kingdom Orders-in-Council applied to Kenya. 26. Replacement of section 278B of Cap 63. [Issue 1] 4 [Rev. 2012] CAP. 378 Fisheries CHAPTER 378 FISHERIES ACT [Date of assent: 23rd August, 1989.] [Date of commencement: 25th August, 1989.] An Act of Parliament to provide for the development, management, exploitation, utilization and conservation of fisheries and for connected purposes [Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passes in England and Wales
    Environment Agency Fish Pass Manual Document – GEHO 0910 BTBP-E-E Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk Further copies of this report are available from GEHO 0910 BTBP-E-E our publications catalogue: v2.2 Nov 2010 http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency or our National Customer Contact Centre: T: 08708 506506 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with E: [email protected]. 2 prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Fish Pass Manual: Guidance Notes On The Legislation, Selection and Approval Of Fish Passes In England And Wales Authors: Greg S Armstrong Miran W Aprahamian G Adrian Fewings Peter J Gough Nigel A Reader Paul V Varallo 3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................9 LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................................12 FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................................13 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]