DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Fish Traps and Weirs of Queensland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenous Fish Traps and Weirs of Queensland Indigenous Fish Traps and Weirs of Queensland Michael J. Rowland1,2 and Sean Ulm2 1 Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit, Department of Environment and Resource Management, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia [email protected] 2 Department of Anthropology, Archaeology and Sociology, School of Arts and Social Sciences, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia [email protected] A Queensland state-wide review of coastal and inland fish traps and weirs is undertaken. More than 179 sites are described. For coastal Queensland, it is demonstrated that traps with multiple pens are common in the Torres Strait and at a limited number of locations in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria. Most traps and weirs south of Torres Strait and the Gulf are isolated structures, with traps in most cases having a single pen. Walls of traps are most often in the shape of an arc and found at points and estuaries and only occasionally on open beaches. Some traps and weirs on the coast were built or used by non-Indigenous people, including South Sea Islanders. Less information could be located on traps and weirs of inland Queensland, which appear to have included many organic traps and weirs. It was found that weirs are common east of the Great Dividing Range, while traps were common to the west. The review draws heavily on unpublished data and reports held by the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management. The use of this information along with published sources, theses, explorer’s diaries and ethnographic accounts allows a comprehensive overview of available information. Fish traps in particular are often found in coastal zones subject to development pressure and this work provides a baseline resource to generate discussion about research and management of this significant site type in these zones. Introduction traps, weirs and other stone structures. Recommendations Indigenous people throughout Australia have constructed were made concerning the future recording and fish traps and weirs over a long period of time and there is management of traps and weirs in Queensland (see considerable variety in types, numbers, size and location Bowen and Rowland 1999). A potential method for dating of these sites. They were designed to capture aquatic traps and weirs was also developed as part of that study animals, predominantly fish, and the more durable of and is discussed elsewhere (Bowen 1998). these structures (i.e. those made of stone) are still visible This paper builds on the results of Bowen and on Australia’s coasts and rivers today. Fish were also Rowland’s (1999) study to provide a comprehensive caught in natural pools and in a variety of small portable review of information pertaining to Indigenous fish traps traps but this review focuses predominantly on the more and weirs in Queensland. The review provides a baseline substantive and durable non-portable devices. resource to generate discussion about research, Fish traps have assumed an important place in management and other issues. The Queensland discussions concerning late Holocene Aboriginal culture Department of Environment and Resource Management change, in particular their possible role in increasing Indigenous Cultural Heritage Database (ICHD) provides marine production (Lourandos 1997). However, attempts the basis for this review, supplemented by published to directly date these structures have so far been articles and books, as well as unpublished reports and unsuccessful (e.g. McNiven 1994) with chronology often theses. An attempt has been made to incorporate established through dating of associated cultural deposits information from a wide range of sources, including (e.g. Bowen 1998; Ulm 2006). Recent discussions (e.g. explorer’s diaries, ethnographic accounts, and cultural McNiven 2003) have also developed the idea that some heritage surveys. Many of the sources reviewed here are stone features in the intertidal zone are associated with the not published or have limited availability, enhancing the cosmological landscape rather than serving a purely value of assembling this reference work. Published economic function. As McNiven (2003) demonstrates summaries of site types for Australia, individual States or with examples from the Torres Strait, the two spheres are Territories, or regions are rare (e.g. Hiscock and Mitchell not mutually exclusive with large fish trap complexes 1993) and it is hoped this review might encourage others playing a key role in the way that landscapes and to undertake similar reviews since they are extremely seascapes are inscribed with social meaning. Welz (2002) valuable for comparative purposes and for providing a has also attempted to interpret the fish traps of the Lower strategic focus for future research and management. Eyre Peninsula in the context of cultural and The review is organised into three major sections. The environmental variables using a landscape approach. first two sections synthesise descriptive information about In an unpublished report on Queensland traps and the types and distribution of traps and weirs in coastal and weirs produced by Bowen and Rowland (1999) an attempt inland areas respectively. For simplicity, an arbitrary was made to identify the range of site types, methods of geographic division of Queensland into five zones is construction, distribution across the landscape, antiquity, employed: Gulf of Carpentaria, Torres Strait, Northeast, possible origins, and possible overall economic function. Central and South (Figure 1). The final section considers The report sought to identify criteria that could be used to key research and management themes arising from the discriminate between Indigenous traps and those made by review, including determining the origins of traps and Europeans and South Sea Islanders who have built similar weirs, patterns in distribution, function, dating, and best Rowland & Ulm q a r | Vol. 14 | 2011 | 1 Figure 1. Fish traps registered on the ICHD and major geographical divisions employed in this discussion: Gulf of Carpentaria, Torres Strait, Northeast, Central, South. 2 | 2011 | Vol. 14 | q a r Indigenous Fish Traps and Weirs of Queensland practice guidelines for documentation and monitoring. A of South Australia indicate that the most common type of comprehensive listing of traps and weirs registered on the fish trap was a V-shaped weir. They may have been built ICHD is provided in Appendix A, which includes on bases of eroded calcreted Pleistocene dunes using a information about basic site attributes. Note that not all combination of loose limestone blocks and wooden sticks sites listed in Appendix A are discussed in the text owing but detailed surveys of the areas failed to find any to limited information (CW:B03, FK:C80, JC:A21, archaeological traces of these sites (Ross 2009). Fish traps KA:A67, KA:A72, KB:F91, LA:C80, KC:D93) or may therefore have been more common on Australia’s restricted status (DL:B03). coastline than the physical remains suggest. We identify five primary pen shapes or forms (see also Definitions McNiven 1994:92) (Table 1, Figure 2). The most The terms ‘traps’ and ‘weirs’ are often used common form is the U- or arc-shape followed by the V- interchangeably (e.g. Clarke 2002:154-157; Connaway shape. With a small surface area exposed to water, these 2007:5; Bannerman and Jones 1999). In the Australian shapes are better able to disperse pressure, and thus ethnographic and archaeological literature however there remain intact compared with those with a larger surface is a tendency to make a distinction between the two area, such as a square. They degrade slowly and thus though it is not consistently applied. On a worldwide require minimal maintenance (Meriam and Kraige basis, Connaway (2007:5) defines a ‘weir’ as an 1987:270-280). Some traps have a single pen, while obstruction placed in a stream or tideway or along a others have multiple pens, which may in some cases have shoreline to channel fish into a procurement area, while a been designed for the purpose of dividing and holding ‘trap’ is a device placed in the procurement area to fish (Van Waarden and Wilson 1994:81). capture and impound fish for collection but again the Most of the traps and weirs reviewed here are terminology is often used interchangeably. In this registered on the ICHD and are referred to using their site discussion we have tended to use the term used by the number based on the 1:250,000 map sheet series for recorder or observer. Fish traps and weirs in Australia Queensland (i.e. the site designated FL:C09 refers to the range from slight modifications to natural features of the Ingham sheet and is the 209th site recorded for the map landscape to special purpose-built structures (Mulvaney sheet. Sites are numbered A1-99, B100-199, C200-299 and Kamminga 1999:34-35). A ‘trap’ is generally defined etc). Other fish traps are not registered on the ICHD, but as an artificial structure (normally made of stone) found are described in published and unpublished sources. predominately in the intertidal zone with a length and breath that creates a holding area (cf. McNiven 2003). A trap may contain a single or multiple pens. Table 1. Primary fish trap or pen forms (see Figure 2 A trap with a clearly identifiable pen may be relatively for examples). easy to identify, however, a trap whose areas are further subdivided into pens may be decidedly more difficult to Type Description define. Memmott et al. (2008) faced with these U-shaped An arc-shaped curve oriented so that the methodological problems decided on an interim working open end faces the shore. Also referred to decision to treat each single wall feature as a unit and as ‘arc’. defer abstract interpretation (i.e. definition of a pen) until V-shaped A ‘V’-shaped variant of the arc-shaped further fieldwork.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Final Report Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale, Melissa George, Rosemary Hill and Duane Fraser Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale1, Melissa George2, Rosemary Hill3 and Duane Fraser 1The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns 2NAILSMA, Darwin 3CSIRO, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme Project 3.9: Indigenous capacity building and increased participation in management of Queensland sea country © CSIRO, 2016 Creative Commons Attribution Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? is licensed by CSIRO for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-91-5 This report should be cited as: Dale, A., George, M., Hill, R. and Fraser, D. (2016) Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (50pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Tropical Water Quality (TWQ) Hub. The Tropical Water Quality Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme and is administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Many Voices Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Action Plan
    Yetimarala Yidinji Yi rawarka lba Yima Yawa n Yir bina ach Wik-Keyangan Wik- Yiron Yam Wik Pa Me'nh W t ga pom inda rnn k Om rungu Wik Adinda Wik Elk Win ala r Wi ay Wa en Wik da ji Y har rrgam Epa Wir an at Wa angkumara Wapabura Wik i W al Ng arra W Iya ulg Y ik nam nh ar nu W a Wa haayorre Thaynakwit Wi uk ke arr thiggi T h Tjung k M ab ay luw eppa und un a h Wa g T N ji To g W ak a lan tta dornd rre ka ul Y kk ibe ta Pi orin s S n i W u a Tar Pit anh Mu Nga tra W u g W riya n Mpalitj lgu Moon dja it ik li in ka Pir ondja djan n N Cre N W al ak nd Mo Mpa un ol ga u g W ga iyan andandanji Margany M litja uk e T th th Ya u an M lgu M ayi-K nh ul ur a a ig yk ka nda ulan M N ru n th dj O ha Ma Kunjen Kutha M ul ya b i a gi it rra haypan nt Kuu ayi gu w u W y i M ba ku-T k Tha -Ku M ay l U a wa d an Ku ayo tu ul g m j a oo M angan rre na ur i O p ad y k u a-Dy K M id y i l N ita m Kuk uu a ji k la W u M a nh Kaantju K ku yi M an U yi k i M i a abi K Y -Th u g r n u in al Y abi a u a n a a a n g w gu Kal K k g n d a u in a Ku owair Jirandali aw u u ka d h N M ai a a Jar K u rt n P i W n r r ngg aw n i M i a i M ca i Ja aw gk M rr j M g h da a a u iy d ia n n Ya r yi n a a m u ga Ja K i L -Y u g a b N ra l Girramay G al a a n P N ri a u ga iaba ithab a m l j it e g Ja iri G al w i a t in M i ay Giy L a M li a r M u j G a a la a P o K d ar Go g m M h n ng e a y it d m n ka m np w a i- u t n u i u u u Y ra a r r r l Y L a o iw m I a a G a a p l u i G ull u r a d e a a tch b K d i g b M g w u b a M N n rr y B thim Ayabadhu i l il M M u i a a
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland
    REPORT TO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (RID), NORTH REGION ON An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland Volume 1 February 1999 Peter Wilson (Land Resource Officer, Land Information Management) Seonaid Philip (Senior GIS Technician) Department of Natural Resources Resource Management GIS Unit Centre for Tropical Agriculture 28 Peters Street, Mareeba Queensland 4880 DNRQ990076 Queensland Government Technical Report This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1999 For information about this report contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank the input of staff of the Department of Natural Resources GIS Unit Mareeba. Also that of DNR water resources staff, particularly Mr Jeff Benjamin. Mr Steve Ockerby, Queensland Department of Primary Industries provided invaluable expertise and advice for the development of the agricultural suitability assessment. Mr Phil Bierwirth of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) provided an introduction to and knowledge of Airborne Gamma Spectrometry. Assistance with the interpretation of AGS data was provided through the Department of Natural Resources Enhanced Resource Assessment project.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Queensland Water Supply Strategy Investigation
    NW Queensland Water Supply Strategy Investigation Final Consultant Report 9 March 2016 Document history Author/s Romy Greiner Brett Twycross Rohan Lucas Checked Adam Neilly Approved Brett Twycross Contact: Name Alluvium Consulting Australia ABN 76 151 119 792 Contact person Brett Twycross Ph. (07) 4724 2170 Email [email protected] Address 412 Flinders Street Townsville QLD 4810 Postal address PO Box 1581 Townsville QLD 4810 Ref Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology 2 2.1 Geographic scope and relevant regional characteristics 2 2.2 Situation and vulnerability analysis 3 2.3 Multi criteria decision analysis 5 2.3.1 The principles of multi criteria decision making 5 2.3.2 Quantitative criteria 7 2.3.3 Qualitative criteria 8 3 Situation analysis: Water demand and supply 12 3.1 Overview 12 3.2 Urban water demand and supply 14 3.2.1 Mount Isa 14 3.2.2 Cloncurry 15 3.3 Mining and mineral processing water demand and supply 16 3.3.1 Mount Isa precinct 16 3.3.2 Cloncurry precinct 17 3.4 Agriculture 18 3.5 Uncommitted water 19 3.6 Projected demand and water security 19 3.7 Vulnerability to water shortages 20 4 Water infrastructure alternatives 21 4.1 New water storage in the upper Cloncurry River catchment 23 4.1.1 Cave Hill Dam 23 4.1.2 Black Fort Dam 25 4.1.3 Painted Rock Dam 26 4.1.4 Slaty Creek 27 4.1.5 Combination of Black Fort Dam and Slaty Creek 27 4.2 Increasing the capacity of the Lake Julius water supply 28 4.3 Utilising currently unused water storage infrastructure 30 4.3.1 Corella Dam 30 4.3.2 Lake Mary Kathleen 31 5 Ranking
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape York Region
    141°0'E 142°0'E 143°0'E 144°0'E 145°0'E Buru Erubam Le & Warul Ugar (Stephens (Darnley Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from NNTT based on boundaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas being claimed) as To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an application or Kawa data sourced from Department of Natural Resources, MIsinlaens daendrs E) n#e1rgy (Qld) © ITshlaendtehresy) h#a1ve been recognised by the Federal Court process. determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and State of Queensland for that portion where their data has been used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal Court, the databases is required. Further information is available from the Tribunals website at map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the Register of Native Title www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Topographic vector data is © CommonwealthM aosf iAgu Psteraolipal e(Geoscience Australia) Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 Gebara 2006. and Damuth The applications shown on the map include: Non freehold land tenure sourced from DNRME (QLD) February 2019. - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the registration test), The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and agents Cape York Region Islanders #1 People - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being applied, and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept no liability and give As part oYf atmhe transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in 1998, all - unregistered applications (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia
    Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2001 Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2002 Published by ICLARM – The World Fish Center, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960 Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), S-105 25 (Office: Sveavagen 20, Stockholm), Stockholm, Sweden. Torell, M. and A.M. Salamanca, Editors. 1997. Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia. ICLARM Technical Report 60, 212p. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Cataloguing in Publication Data Institutional issues and perspectives in the management of fisheries and coastal resources in Southeast Asia/ editors Magnus Torell, Albert M. Salamanca. ISBN 983-2346-07-X 1. Fisheries—management – Asia Southeastern. 2. Marine resources—Asia, Southeastern. I. Torell, Magnus. II. Salamanca, Albert M. 639.20959 Managing editors: Sandra Child, Peter R Gardiner and Janet-Maychin Copyeditors: Terrence Clayton and Albert M Salamanca Indexer: Barry Howarth Layout and design: Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover concept: Albert M Salamanca Cover design: Sam Studio Graphics and Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover: Diverse uses of the coastal zone. ISBN 983-2346-07-X ICLARM –The World Fish Center Contribution No. 1654 Printed by Sun Printers Sdn Bhd, Malaysia ICLARM-The World Fish Center is one of the 16 international research centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) that has initiated the public awareness campaign, Future Harvest. Contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at Site 35Ti90, Tillamook, Oregon
    DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Findings: + (35TI90) County: Tillamook T/R/S: Section 25, T1S, R10W, WM Quad/Date: Tillamook, OR (1985) Project Type: Site Damage Assessment, Testing, Data Recovery, Monitoring New Prehistoric 0 Historic 0 Isolate 0 Archaeological Permit Nos.: AP-964, -1055, -1191 Curation Location: Oregon State Museum of Natural and Cultural History under Accession Number 1739 DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. Prepared for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, OR 97201 February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Archaeological Investigations at Site 35TI90, Tillamook, Oregon ABSTRACT Between April 2007 and October 2009, Applied Archaeological Research, Inc. (AAR) conducted multiple phases of archaeological investigations at the part of site 35TI90 located in the area of potential effects related to the city of Tillamook’s upgrade and expansion of its wastewater treatment plant (TWTP) located along the Trask River at the western edge of the city. Archaeological investigations described in this report include evaluative test excavations, a site damage assessment, three rounds of data recovery, investigations related to an inadvertent discovery, and archaeological monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns - Townsville Experience Development Strategy Pilot
    Cairns - Townsville Experience Development Strategy Pilot CAIRNS-TOWNSVILLE EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Cairns-Townsville Experiences Audit Report September, 2011 Cairns-Townsville Experiences Audit Report Final Disclaimer: Whilst all care and diligence have been exercised in the preparation of this report, AEC Group Limited does not warrant the accuracy of the information contained within and accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may be suffered as a result of reliance on this information, whether or not there has been any error, omission or negligence on the part of AEC Group Limited or their employees. Any forecasts or projections used in the analysis can be affected by a number of unforeseen variables, and as such no warranty is given that a particular set of results will in fact be achieved. i Cairns-Townsville Experiences Audit Report Final Executive Summary Background As part of the Australian Government’s National Long-term Tourism Strategy a partnership between the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism (DRET), Tourism Queensland, Townsville Enterprise Limited, Tourism Tropical North Queensland and the Wet Tropics Management Authority is seeking to develop a pilot Experience Development Strategy (EDS) for the Cairns-Townsville Tourism Hubs. The Strategy aims to identify existing and potential world class visitor experiences for Cairns and Townsville that function as tourism hubs providing a combination of urban tourism experiences and a base for a range of day trip experiences into the surrounding Wet Tropics and Great Barrier Reef. It aims to outline how the region can innovate, improve and renew the experience for Experience Seeker tourists in order to remain a competitive destination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem
    The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem Author Jones, David John Published 2017 Thesis Type Thesis (Professional Doctorate) School Queensland College of Art DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2241 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365954 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem David John Jones Dip VA, BVA Hons, MAVA Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Visual Arts Queensland College of Art Art, Education and Law Griffith University June 2017 1 Abstract This studio-based project identifies and interrogates the Australian denial of violent national foundation as a ‘settler’ problem, which is framed by the contemporary clinical and social concept of a ‘vicious cycle of anxiety’. The body of work I have produced aims to disrupt the denial of invasion and the erasure of Aboriginal culture through accepted narratives of European settlement of Australia. By aligning collective denial with anxiety, it presents a pathway for remediation through situational exposure; in this case, through works of art. The critical perspective on the invasion and colonisation of Australia is presented in the discursive and non- discursive modes of communication of the coloniser not to arbitrate or appease but to amplify the content. The structure of the exegesis also draws from Aboriginal narrative methodology and integrates with, and is informed by, the studio production in printmaking using demanding traditional European graphic techniques such as etching and aquatint. 2 Statement of Originality: This work has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma in any university.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM for the BURNETT RIVER
    Bureau Home > Australia > Queensland > Rainfall & River Conditions > River Brochures > Burnett FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM for the BURNETT RIVER This brochure describes the flood warning system operated by the Australian Government, Bureau of Meteorology for the Burnett River. It includes reference information which will be useful for understanding Flood Warnings and River Height Bulletins issued by the Bureau's Flood Warning Centre during periods of high rainfall and flooding. Contained in this document is information about: (Last updated September 2019) Flood Risk Previous Flooding Flood Forecasting Local Information Flood Warnings and Bulletins Interpreting Flood Warnings and River Height Bulletins Flood Classifications Other Links Burnett River at Mundubbera Flood Risk The Burnett River is located on the southern Queensland coast with the mouth of the river sited just north of the City of Bundaberg. The total area of the catchment is about 33,000 square kilometres. The Burnett River rises in the Dawes Range, just north of Monto and flows south through Eidsvold and Mundubbera. Along the way it is joined by the Nogo and Auburn Rivers which drain large areas in the west of the catchment. Just before Mundubbera, the main river is joined by the Boyne River draining areas from the south and then begins its northeasterly journey to the coast. Between Gayndah and Mt Lawless, the Barker-Barambah Creeks system joins the Burnett River. Major flooding in the Burnett River is relatively infrequent. However, under favourable meteorological conditions such as a tropical low pressure system, heavy rainfalls can occur throughout the catchment which can result in significant river level rises and floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape York Region Islanders #1 Non Freehold Land Tenure Sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021
    141°0'E 142°0'E 143°0'E 144°0'E 145°0'E Buru & Erubam Le Warul Kawa Masig People Ugar (Stephens Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from NNTT based( Doanrnbloeuyndaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas being claimed) as To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an application or and Damuth Islanders) #1 data sourced from Department of Resources (Qld) © The State of Queensland foIsr ltahnadt etrhse)y # h1ave been recognised by the Federal Court process. determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and People portion where their data has been used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal Court, the databases is required. Further information is available from the Tribunals website at map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the Register of Native Title www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 Gebara 2006. The applications shown on the map include: Cape York Region Islanders #1 Non freehold land tenure sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021. - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the registration test), The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and agents - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being applied, and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept no liability and give As part Yofa mthe transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in 1998, all - unregistered applications (i.e.
    [Show full text]