American Revolution Timeline” in Your Student’S Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Revolution Timeline” in Your Student’S Journal Chapter 14 Stories of the American Revolution Starting Point: Te American Revolutionary War is a inspiring collection of experiences and history by regular people who believed in the goals of liberty and gave all they had, some even their lives, to see the dream realized. Spot Light The stone walls of Fort Ticonderoga Fort Ticonderoga: Fort Ticonderoga is located near to the south end of Lake Champlain in the state of New York. Te fort is star-shaped. ADY TO R X PLO R? War? war? 135 America's Story One - interior 1st.indd 135 1/16/17 11:46 AM The Declaration of France and America The British Independence sign an alliance to unify March 1776 February 1778 In this chapter, we are going to learn about the war that the colonies fought for their freedom from England — the American Revolution. Tis was a long war, full of heroes and tales of bravery, and it would take me a great deal longer than one or two chapters to tell you about it all. Instead of giving you a large number of names, dates, and battle information, I am going to tell you the story of only a few of the most important people and their brave deeds. As you remember from our last chapter, the frst shot of the Revolution was fred in Lexington. Te British had gone there to capture the stores of ammunition gathered by the Patriots. Tey did not succeed, for the brave Patriots held them of, forcing them out of Lexington. Afer the battle at Lexington, the English army marched on to Concord. Again, they planned to capture the stockpile of ammunitions there, and again they failed, for the American soldiers, who had beaten them there had hidden most of the ammunition in the woods. From all over the colonies, men laid down their tools of trade and picked up their weapons, ready to fght for freedom. Te British, who had thought they would have an easy time, were surprised by the fghting spirit of these colonists! Te English soldiers, who had marched on Lexington and Concord, now turned to march back to Boston. Tey had a hard time of it though, for along the way American soldiers hid and ambushed them, “Indian style.” By the time the remaining British troops reached Boston, they were being chased by twenty thousand American militiamen. I wonder if those British soldiers felt like bear cubs that had awakened a giant nest of swarming bees! It was during this time that the leaders of the colonies, the Continental Congress, were meeting to appoint a commander in chief for what was now being called the Continental Army. Tey chose George Washington. Brave Mr. Washington is a bit older than he was in our last encounter; he had spent the last 17 years running his plantation and helping the Sons of Liberty. Shortly aferward, the American spy network learned the British were trying to fortify their control in Boston by sending troops out into the hills around the city. Te Americans beat them to it and set up battle lines throughout the hills. What followed was to become the famous Battle of Bunker Hill. It took three attacks from the British to knock the Continental Army back, and it would never 136 The Batle of Lexington America's Story One - interior 1st.indd 136 1/16/17 11:46 AM have happened at all except the Americans ran out of gunpowder. Many more British soldiers than American soldiers were killed that day. Even though they won the Battle of Bunker Hill, the British were starting to understand that this war was not going to be as easy as they had thought it would be to win. General George Washington was busy training his men. Te farmers and other tradesmen who had flled the ranks of the The Death of General Warren voluntary colonial militia, were now ftted at the Batle of Bunker’s Hill for uniforms and being trained in ways of battle. General Washington was a fne man who loved God and his country, and he was a great general. He put a plan into action to regain control of Boston and its harbor. One night, he ordered his men to quietly station themselves and their cannons on the hills looking down on Boston. Te unsuspecting British, who were occupying the city, awoke to a rather unpleasant surprise! It would be rather unsettling to wake up to an army and cannons surrounding your town. Te British had the battle of Bunker Hill fresh in their memories and decided to leave Boston without a fght. Afer leaving Boston, the British came with a bigger army to New York. Teir plan was to seize the northern colonies along with the bigger cities of New York and Philadelphia. Tey thought if they could do this, the other colonies’ resistance would crumble. General Washington met the British army at New York, but the smaller American army could not hold of the determined English forces, and Washington and his army were forced to fee through New Jersey. Tis was very discouraging for the American army. Te year afer that, the British again defeated the American army and took control of Philadelphia. Te king of England was thrilled to see the American front crumbling to his soldiers. Surely these stubborn colonists would not be able to withstand for long and would soon give up! What was the American response to this? Mr. Tomas Jeferson was appointed to write something very important. Do you remember what it was? Yes, the Declaration of Independence was written in 1776. It was July 4, 1776, when the Congress adopted the declaration. Te Americans may not have won those battles, but the war was not over yet. Determination and celebration flled the streets of Boston and other towns throughout the colonies. People came together to celebrate the freedom they knew was worth fghting for. Te Liberty Bell rang strong and clear as the people celebrated together. 137 America's Story One - interior 1st.indd 137 1/16/17 11:46 AM Are you starting to see how the puzzle pieces are ftting together now? Let’s take a few minutes to look at the “American Revolution Timeline” in your Student’s Journal. Take the time right now to review what has happened so far in our “Fight for Freedom” story. narration break Use your American Revolution Timeline to retell what has happened so far in our story of the Revolution. Afer the Declaration of Independence was written and celebrated, the Americans took heart, and little by little started winning battles. Te frst major victory for the colonists came when General Washington and his troops secretly crossed the Delaware River into New Jersey on the day afer Christmas 1776. Tere they surprised the enemy and won the battle at Trenton. Another battle was fought and won in the upper part of New York near Saratoga. With great determination, the American army drove back the British that had marched down from Canada. A while later, Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold, the brave commanders of the “Green Mountain Boys,” and militia from Massachusetts and Connecticut, took control of Fort Ticonderoga in New York. General Washington was having a rough time of it, though, and was encamped in Valley Forge in Pennsylvania. It was a bitter winter, and the men did not have enough clothes, coats, or boots to keep them warm. Troughout that terrible winter of 1777, many men died of frostbite and disease. Te dwellings they had were ramshackle and did not keep the wind from blowing through. Spirits sagged as winter dragged on and on. General Washington prayed for his men and for the cause of freedom. Finally, afer months of starving and freezing Washington Crossing the Delaware conditions, something good happened! Our old friend Benjamin Franklin, who was in France at the time of these battles, heard the news about how his fellow colonists were having a hard go of it. He decided to go talk with the king of France. Of course, as we know, France and England did not get along. 138 America's Story One - interior 1st.indd 138 1/16/17 11:46 AM Te king of France saw this as an opportunity to get back at England for winning the French and Indian War and taking away so many of the French American forts and settlements. It wasn’t long before there were French reinforcements sent to General George Washington. Among the new faces were several ofcers from other countries besides France. It seemed that this revolution was catching the attention of the world. Finally, spring came and with it better health. Te days were flled with training, and the men’s spirits lifed. By early summer, the group at Valley Forge looked like diferent men. Clothes and shoes had been s e n gathered from all over the colonies to replace the ragged uniforms Jo l the men had been wearing. Te new training gave the men a new- au P found confdence. All over the colonies, hope was rising, and the fght oh n J for freedom continued on. Now I would like to tell you the story of another brave hero of the Revolution. Tis man did not fght his battles on the rolling hills or in the forest of America. His battleground was the sea. Even though America did not have a navy, John Paul Jones used whatever ships he could fnd to fght the British in the Atlantic Ocean. Many of the ships were pitiful indeed! It would take great courage to face the highly trained, world-renowned, English navy with its huge man-o-war fghting ships ftted with heavy guns and cannons.
Recommended publications
  • The Gaspee Affair As Conspiracy by Lawrence J
    The Gaspee Affair as Conspiracy By Lawrence J. DeVaro, Jr. Rhode Island History, October 1973, pp. 106-121 Digitized and reformatted from .pdf available on-line courtesy RI Historical Society at: http://www.rihs.org/assetts/files/publications/1973_Oct.pdf On the afternoon of June 9, 1772, His Majesty's schooner Gaspee grounded on a shoal called Namquit Point in Narragansett Bay. From the time of their arrival in Rhode Island's waters in February, the Gaspee and her commander, Lieutenant William Dudingston, had been the cause of much commercial frustration of local merchants. Dudingston was insolent, described by one local newspaper as more imperious and haughty than the Grand Turk himself. Past accounts of his pettish nature followed him from port to port.[1] The lieutenant was also shrewd. Aware that owners of seized vessels — rather than navy captains deputized in the customs service — would triumph in any cause brought before Rhode Island's vice-admiralty court, Dudingston had favored the district vice-admiralty court at Boston instead, an option available to customs officials since 1768.[2] Aside from threatening property of Rhode Islanders through possible condemnation of seizures, utilization of the court at Boston invigorated opposition to trials out of the vicinage, a grievance which had irritated merchants within the colony for some time.[3] Finally the lieutenant was zealous — determined to be a conscientious customs officer even if it meant threatening Rhode Island's flourishing illicit trade in non-British, West-Indian molasses. Governor Joseph Wanton of Rhode Island observed that Dudingston also hounded little packet boats as they plied their way between Newport and Providence.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia Jane T
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Faculty Publications History 2004 Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia Jane T. Merritt Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Merritt, Jane T., "Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia" (2004). History Faculty Publications. 29. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs/29 Original Publication Citation Merritt, J. T. (2004). Tea trade, consumption, and the republican paradox in prerevolutionary Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Magazine of History & Biography, 128(2), 117-148. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~£f ft"\ THE ~ Pennsylvania ~ OF HMO~YgA~~!r~\~APHY ~~~~~H=:;;;;;;~~~H~H~H~~~ Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia N JANUARY 2, 1774, a usually cool and controlled William Smith 0 wrote heatedly to his trade partners in New York, "Vanderbelt has sent a parcell of his Trash to Town [per] White & Son wh [which] they confess is not good and are hurting us all by offering to fall the price. Mercer & Ramsay & myself have 4 Hhds [Hogsheads] I suppose of the same which am just told are come down ... from New York." He continued indignantly, "IfVanderbelt has Realy been guilty of Mixing his Tea & cannot be made to pay all damages for his Robbing the public & breaking all Mercantile faith, I think we have very little security for the Honor which is always suppos'd to subsist amongst Merchants had the thing happened here & been proved the Offender wd be consider'd in a most dispicable light."1 Smith's indignity over a merchant's lost honor had precedence.
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women's Rights Movement
    Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement PIVOTAL MOMENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY Series Editors David Hackett Fischer James M. McPherson James T. Patterson Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy Maury Klein Rainbow’s End: The Crash of 1929 James M. McPherson Crossroads of Freedom: The Battle of Antietam Glenn C. Altschuler All Shook Up: How Rock ’n’ Roll Changed America David Hackett Fischer Washington’s Crossing John Ferling Adams vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800 Colin G. Calloway The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America Joel H. Silbey Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War Raymond Arsenault Freedom Riders: 1961 and the Struggle for Racial Justice Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement 32 Sally G. McMillen 1 2008 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2008 by Sally G. McMillen Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • American Revolution
    Note Cards 151. Battle of the Alamance May 1771 - An army recruited by the North Carolina government put down the rebellion of the Carolina Regulators at Alamance Creek. The leaders of the Regulators were executed. 152. Gaspée Incident In June, 1772, the British customs ship Gaspée ran around off the colonial coast. When the British went ashore for help, colonials boarded the ship and burned it. They were sent to Britain for trial. Colonial outrage led to the widespread formation of Committees of Correspondence. 153. Governor Thomas Hutchinson of Massachusetts A Boston-born merchant who served as the Royal Governor of Massachusetts from 1771 to 1774. Even before becoming Governor, Hutchinson had been a supporter of Parliament's right to tax the colonies, and his home had been burned by a mob during the Stamp Acts riots in 1765. In 1773 his refusal to comply with demands to prohibit an East India Company ship from unloading its cargo percipitated the Boston Tea Party. He fled to England in 1774, where he spent the remainder of his life. 154. Committees of Correspondence These started as groups of private citizens in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York who, in 1763, began circulating information about opposition to British trade measures. The first government-organized committee appeared in Massachusetts in 1764. Other colonies created their own committtees in order to exchange information and organize protests to British trade regulations. The Committees became particularly active following the Gaspee Incident. 155. Lord North Prime Minister of England from 1770 to 1782. Although he repealed the Townshend Acts, he generally went along with King George III's repressive policies towards the colonies even though he personally considered them wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads of the American Revolution in New Jersey
    The National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia Support Office Crossroads of the American Revolution in New Jersey Special Resource Study National Heritage Area Feasibility Study Environmental Assessment August 2002 This report has been prepared to provide Congress and the public with information about the resources in the study area and how they relate to criteria for inclusion within the national park system and for feasibility of a national heritage area. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support either specific legisla- tive authorization for the project or appropriation for its implementation. Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the national park system and other programs. This report was prepared by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Philadelphia Support Office. For additional copies or more information contact: National Park Service Philadelphia Support Office Planning and Legislation Program 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 (215) 597-6479 Abstract Special Resource Study National Heritage Area Feasibility Study Environmental Assessment Crossroads of the American Revolution, New Jersey August 2002 This Special Resource Study (SRS), National Heritage Area (NHA) Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment examines the resources within a fifteen-county
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Account of the Old State House of Pennsylvania Now
    Independence Hall, 1876. FRONT VIEW. AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT UK THE OLD STATE HOUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA NOW KNOWN AS THE HALL OF INDEPENDENCE « BY / FRANK M ETTING WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY 1876 Copyright, 1874, By FRANK M ETTING KIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: •EREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. PREFACE In the work that I had " found for my hand to do," it became necessary to examine carefully into the details of the building of the State House of Pennsylvania ; much that surprised me came to light not only in the circumstances of its erection but in its subsequent C history. Instead of Dr. Kearsley, to whom the credit had been as- cribed, I discovered that its Architect and actual Builder was one of the greatest men ever fostered by Pennsylvania ; and that every important movement, from the very inception of the efforts of the colonists to assert their constitutional liberty, first assumed shape either within this building or under the shadow of its walls. A friendly suggestion thrown out induced me to extend still further my investigations, with a view of preserving the information in print in some accessible form. This desire was enhanced by the hope that the general public would ultimately share in the interest which every brick of this old build- ing possesses for me, and thus be inclined to lend each his individual aid towards its preservation, and to insure its proper custodianship for all time. The desultory way in which, from causes unnecessary to be detailed, my memoranda have been thrown together, must leave its impress, and I cannot expect to be exempt from inaccuracies ; but having done my best without fee or reward, present or prospective, I have no apologies to make to the public for claiming their notice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Memory of the Boston Tea Party and the Transformation of Dissent
    BALANCING THE SCALE OF RATIONALITY: THE PUBLIC MEMORY OF THE BOSTON TEA PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF DISSENT by Copyright 2010 Meredith Diane Neville B.A., Furman University Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. __________________________________________ Dr. Dave Tell, Committee Chairperson __________________________________________ Dr. Robert C. Rowland, Committee Member __________________________________________ Dr. Beth Innocenti, Committee Member Date Defended: ________June 9, 2010________ The Thesis Committee for Meredith Neville certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: BALANCING THE SCALE OF RATIONALITY: THE PUBLIC MEMORY OF THE BOSTON TEA PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF DISSENT __________________________________________ Dr. Dave Tell, Committee Chairperson Date Approved: ________June 9, 2010__________ ii ABSTRACT Meredith Diane Neville, Master of Arts Department of Communication Studies, June 2010 University of Kansas This study examines the public memory of the Boston Tea Party as it has been appropriated for political purposes throughout history. First, I examine the Boston Tea Party to show that the rhetoric surrounding this protest created a tradition of American dissent in which dissenters created a balance between the rational and the irrational. Next, I analyze how woman suffragists participated in the centennial celebration of the Boston Tea Party in 1873 by planning protests that evoked the message of the Boston Tea Party. I illustrate that the rhetoric relevant to these events carried on the tradition of dissent established one hundred years earlier as these women balanced assertions of irrationality with rational argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the American Revolution, 1754-1783
    Unit 2 Resources SUGGESTED PACING CHART Unit 2 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Unit 2 (1 Day) (5 Days) (4 Days) (5 Days) (2 Days) Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Introduction Chapter 4 Intro, Chapter 5 Intro, Chapter 6 Intro, Wrap-Up/Project Section 1 Section 1 Section 1 Day 2 Day 2 Day 2 Day 2 Unit 2 Section 2 Section 2 Section 2 Assessment Day 3 Day 3 Day 3 Section 3 Section 3 Section 3 Day 4 Day 4 Day 4 Section 4 Chapter 5 Section 4 Day 5 Assessment Day 5 Chapter 4 Chapter 6 Assessment Assessment Use the following tools to easily assess student learning in a variety of ways: • Performance Assessment • tav.glencoe.com Activities and Rubrics • Interactive Tutor Self-Assessment CD-ROM • Chapter and Unit Tests • MindJogger Videoquiz • Section Quizzes • ExamView® Pro Testmaker CD-ROM • Standardized Test Skills Practice Workbook • SAT I/II Test Practice • tav.glencoe.com TEACHING TRANSPARENCIES The American Vision Unit 2 Map Overlay Transparencies Cause-and-Effect Transparency 2 Visit the American Vision Web site for history overviews, activities, assessments, and updated charts and graphs. Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. • www.socialstudies.glencoe.com CAUSE-AND-EFFECT TRANSPARENCY 2 Glencoe Social Studies Creating a Nation Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Creating a Nation Visit the Glencoe Web site for social studies activities, Base Causes Effects Land Claims in North America, 1783 Map Map Transparency 2 A B C D E Proclamation of France and Spain 1763 limits colonial aid the Patriots settlement beyond updates, and links to other sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the 1876 Centennial Exhibition
    REMEMBRANCE AND THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: WOMEN AND THE 1876 CENTENNIAL EXHIBITION A Dissertation Submitted to The Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Dolores Pfeuffer-Scherer December, 2016 Examining Committee Members: Kenneth L. Kusmer, Advisory Chair, Department of History, Temple University Susan Klepp, Department of History, Temple University David Waldstreicher, Department of History, Graduate Center, CUNY Judith Giesberg, Department of History, Villanova University ABSTRACT The United States Centennial was a pivotal event to celebrate the founding of the American nation. People came together to show the unity and progress of the United States, specifically after the division of the Civil War. As the industrial revolution took off in earnest, Americans were keen to show the world that they were united and taking the lead in industrial change. Further, to show that the United States was a force in the world, other nations were invited to participate by displaying their culture at the event. The Women’s Centennial Executive Committee (WCEC) became part of the effort to raise funds early on in the process. A group of thirteen women joined together with Benjamin Franklin’s great-granddaughter selected as their president and they set forth to raise funds and gain publicity for a “Woman’s Section” in the main building. When that prospect was denied them, the women then began to again raise monies, but this time for their own Women’s Pavilion. Determined not to be cut out of the exhibition, the women labored tirelessly to make their ideas reality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of a Gendered Memory in Philadelphia and Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, 1860-1914
    FOR THE LOVE OF ONE’S COUNTRY: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GENDERED MEMORY IN PHILADELPHIA AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, 1860-1914 _______________________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor Of Philosophy ________________________________________________________________________ By Smadar Shtuhl May, 2011 Examining Committee Members: Susan E. Klepp, Advisory Chair, History Wilbert L. Jenkins, History Jonathan Daniel Wells, History Rebecca T. Alpert, External Member, Temple University © by Smadar Shtuhl 2011 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT The acquisition of the home of George Washington by the Mount Vernon Ladies Association in 1858 was probably the first preservation project led by women in the United States. During the following decades, elite Philadelphia and Montgomery County women continued the construction of historical memory through the organization and popularization of exhibitions, fundraising galas, preservation of historical sites, publication of historical writings, and the erection of patriotic monuments. Drawing from a wide variety of sources, including annual organizations’ reports, minutes of committees and of a DAR chapter, correspondence, reminiscences, newspapers, circulars, and ephemera, the dissertation argues that privileged women constructed a classed and gendered historical memory, which aimed to write women into the national historical narrative and present themselves as custodians of history. They constructed a subversive historical account that placed women on equal footing with male historical figures and argued that women played a significant role in shaping the nation’s history. During the first three decades, privileged women advanced an idealized memory of Martha and George Washington with an intention to reconcile the sectional rift caused by the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Manuscript Collections of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
    1 (Juidti to the >mr$ti Collections OK NNSYLVANIA iilfimH H HI 1 'LI B RAFLY OF THE U N IVER.SITY Of ILLINOIS SURVEY ILL. HIST. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/guidetomanuscriOhist Quide to the zJtfCanuscript Qollections OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA Second Edition PHILADELPHIA THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA DECEMBER 2, I949 Copyright, 1949, by The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 'Preface to the Second Edition The first edition of The Guide to the Manuscript Collections of The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, published in 1940, was compiled by The Historical Records Survey, Division of Professional and Service Projects, Works Progress Administration. The Society's manuscript holdings at that time were estimated to be 2,500,000 items, contained in 1,141 listed collections. Within the last decade, these holdings have increased approximately 60%, so that now some 4,000,000 items are to be found in 1,609 collec- tions. Furthermore, whereas in 1940 only 30% of the manuscripts were arranged for ready use by students, today 98% are so arranged. During the past ten years, we have also made every effort to improve the manuscript catalogue which has grown from 200,000 to 500,000 cards. In spite of this tremendous increase, the number of items covered by each card has been reduced from 12.5 in 1940 to 8.0 at present. This represents real progress, but much work remains to be done. Excluding our holdings of foreign manuscripts, which number some 200,000 items of considerable importance, our collections deal primarily with Philadelphia and Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • American Colonial Committees of Correspondence: Encountering Oppression, Exploring Unity, and Exchanging Visions of the Future
    American Colonial Committees of Correspondence: Encountering Oppression, Exploring Unity, and Exchanging Visions of the Future Ben Warford­Johnston Junior Division Historical Paper Paper Length: 2,499 American Colonial Committees of Correspondence: Encountering Oppression, Exploring Unity, and Exchanging Visions of the Future The complete accomplishment of it in so short a time and by such simple means was perhaps a singular example in the history of mankind. Thirteen clocks were made to strike together: a perfection of mechanism, which no artist had ever before effected. ­ John Adams 1 Introduction For a century and a half, the relationship between Great Britain and the American colonies was a quiet one. While the mother country had long asserted the right to regulate her imperial child, few impositions were made, which enabled the colonies to experiment with self­rule. This period of exploration abruptly ceased at the conclusion of the French and Indian War when King George III attempted to reassert dominion. As revenue­generating taxes and measures to control colonial governments thundered from across the Atlantic, his decrees conflicted with the notions of liberty and autonomy that had become integral to the American ethos. Rather than suffering in silence, colonists began denouncing perceived oppression, and in ​ ​ doing so, they recognized that they were not alone. Individual frustrations accumulated into community calls for change. Grievances amassed, momentum spread, and protests reverberated throughout the colonies. Between the pivotal years of 1772 and 1774, hundreds of committees of correspondence formed to facilitate communication and amplify demands. They networked the provinces, which ultimately resulted in the Continental Congress where representatives began speaking against Great Britain with one resounding voice.
    [Show full text]