DOCSLIB.ORG

Women and the 1876 Centennial Exhibition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women and the 1876 Centennial Exhibition REMEMBRANCE AND THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: WOMEN AND THE 1876 CENTENNIAL EXHIBITION A Dissertation Submitted to The Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Dolores Pfeuffer-Scherer December, 2016 Examining Committee Members: Kenneth L. Kusmer, Advisory Chair, Department of History, Temple University Susan Klepp, Department of History, Temple University David Waldstreicher, Department of History, Graduate Center, CUNY Judith Giesberg, Department of History, Villanova University ABSTRACT The United States Centennial was a pivotal event to celebrate the founding of the American nation. People came together to show the unity and progress of the United States, specifically after the division of the Civil War. As the industrial revolution took off in earnest, Americans were keen to show the world that they were united and taking the lead in industrial change. Further, to show that the United States was a force in the world, other nations were invited to participate by displaying their culture at the event. The Women’s Centennial Executive Committee (WCEC) became part of the effort to raise funds early on in the process. A group of thirteen women joined together with Benjamin Franklin’s great-granddaughter selected as their president and they set forth to raise funds and gain publicity for a “Woman’s Section” in the main building. When that prospect was denied them, the women then began to again raise monies, but this time for their own Women’s Pavilion. Determined not to be cut out of the exhibition, the women labored tirelessly to make their ideas reality. To raise funds and to draw attention to women’s contributions to society, the women drew upon the females of the founding generation to gain legitimacy in their efforts as women active in the civic sector. Harkening back to the American Revolution, the WCEC inserted women as active participants in the founding of the nation and they used images of Martha Washington and Sarah Franklin Bache to raise funds and bolster their cause. Women, who had sacrificed as men had for the birth of the nation, were noble members of the republic; in presenting women’s labors and inventions in 1876, the WCEC was making the point that women’s lives and contributions in nineteenth century America were as vital and necessary as they had been in the ii eighteenth century. The rewriting of the narrative of the American Revolution enabled the WCEC to celebrate women’s accomplishments in the most public manner and to herald their achievement in both domestic production as well as in terms of education and employment. The women of 1876 formed a continuous line backwards to the Revolution, and they showed the world that American women had always been a vital part of the country and that, if afforded their rights, they would continue to do so into the future. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was possible because of the encouragement and the support of numerous individuals and organizations. I am fortunate to have had a wonderful committee who were an asset every step of the process. My greatest intellectual debt is to Dr. David Waldstreicher, who began at Temple the same semester as I did and who brought me into the world of the Franklin Family, the American Revolution and gender in ways I had not previously experienced. I read, we discussed many, many books, and I gained a knowledge that was with me throughout this study. I miss those wonderful, intellectual chats, supplemented by cake and good cheer. Dr. Susan Klepp refined how I study gender and she was always helpful with her probing questions that often forced me to rethink my writing. Dr. Kenneth Kusmer served as the committee chair and without his steadfast assistance and encouragement; this project would have been far more difficult. Dr. Judith Giesberg of Villanova University was an asset and I am grateful for her ideas presented at my defense. I also wish to thank Dr. Shawn Schurr for her continued support and guidance as well as Christa Viola for her assistance throughout. Temple University awarded me the Allen F Davis Fellowship my first year of graduate school, which enabled me to work at the then Atwater Kent Museum of Philadelphia. Under the guidance of Dr. Cynthia Little, their historian, my interest in Elizabeth Duane Gillespie grew and was cultivated. That year proved invaluable to me personally and in terms of my scholarship. Subsequent fellowships from the Colonial Dame of America, Pennsylvania Chapter; the American Philosophical Society; and the Historical Society of Pennsylvania/Library Company of Philadelphia assisted me with research and yielded many sources which this project rests upon. I am grateful for all of their assistance. iv I would be entirely remiss if I did not thank the wonderful historians I worked with while at Rutgers University, Camden Campus. Dr. Laurie Bernstein, Dr. Rodney Carlisle, Dr. Howard Gillette, Dr. Wayne Glasker, Dr. Janet Golden, Dr. Andrew Lees, Dr. Philip Scranton, Dr. Gerald Verbrugghe, the late Dr. Joan C. Wells, and Dr. Allen L. Woll all nurtured, challenged, and fostered my growth as a historian. I am grateful to all of them. On a personal level, I wish to thank my long-standing colleagues and friends from the doctoral program at Temple University: Henry Buehner, Paul Kahan, and Paul Sivitz. I am grateful for their gift of listening and for their friendship. My dear friend, Debbie Cellini remained by my side throughout the process, even when she was not physically here, her presence kept me strong and steady. My former Rutgers Camden Honors College students remain a force in my life that I am proud of, thanks in good measure to Dr. Allen L. Woll selecting me for the position to help create and grow the program. I want to especially thank Julian Jenkins III, Kristy Krasowski, Amy Sampson Liberi, Jennie Murabito Owens, Shakia Richardson and Craig Shellenberger for their support. Finally, I thank my wonderful parents, Herbert and Dolores Pfeuffer, for one of their greatest gifts: faith in myself. My parents have stood by my side throughout my life and I am beyond grateful. My siblings, Jerry Pfeuffer and Bonnie Warren, and our memories continue to shape me and remind me of our very enjoyable childhood. I thank Bruce J. Scherer for his optimism and confidence in me and for the gift of our son, Quentin M. Scherer. I miss my maternal grandparents daily; they were so special to me, but it is in my son that I see that their love is still with me each day. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS…………………………………………………………….vii CHAPTERS Page 1. BUILDING A LEGACY: WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE............................... 1 2. ELIZABETH DUANE GILLESPIE AND THE FRANKLIN LEGACY………......27 3. “WE HONOR THE WOMEN OF THE REVOLUTION”: THE LADIES AND THE FUNDING OF THE WOMEN’S PAVILION AT THE CENTENNIAL EXHIBITION………………………………………………………………………….56 4. “LET HER WORKS PRAISE HER IN THE GATES”: THE WOMEN’S PAVILION……………………………………………………….…………………..101 5. “THE NEW CENTURY FOR WOMEN” ……………..……………………………135 6. EPILOGUE: THE LEGACY OF THE WCEC………………………………………164 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………...185 vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Illustration Page Tea Party Admission Ticket………………….……..……………..……………………...4 Site Plan Map, Centennial Exhibition Grounds………..………….……………….……30 Elizabeth Duane Gillespie in her Home…………………………….……………….…...54 Elizabeth Duane Gillespie as Martha Washington………………….……………….…..63 Interior, Woman’s Pavilion………………………………………………………….….102 View of the Women’s Pavilion…………………………………………………………107 The Dreaming Iolanthe………………………………………………………………….114 Kindergarten Class………………………………………………………………………124 Art Display, Woman’s Pavilion…………………………………………………………127 Former School for the Deaf and Dumb, Philadelphia, PA……………………………...172 Benjamin Franklin’s Chess Table……………………………………………………….179 Elizabeth Duane Gillespie Middle School……………………………………………….181 vii CHAPTER 1: BUILDING A LEGACY: WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE On the evening of December 17, 1874, Horticultural Hall in Philadelphia was overflowing with members of Philadelphia’s elite. Decorated with flags, banners, flowers, evergreens, shields, lights, and tea tables, the hall was transformed into a celebration of Americana – an evening where the legacy of colonial and revolutionary America came together in the form of women who sought to raise funds and to celebrate their own vision of America as part of the Centennial Exhibition of 1876.1 As Benjamin Franklin’s great-granddaughter, Elizabeth Duane Gillespie, was preparing for the Philadelphia Women’s Centennial Tea party at the Academy of Music, other members of her committee were putting finishing touches on the hall’s decorations for the festivities. The tea party was being held that evening with another one the next night, and the women of the Women’s Centennial Executive Committee [WCEC] were out in force to herald the achievements of their revolutionary forefathers as well as their foremothers. The event was specifically designed and run by the women to highlight the past and insert women into the narrative of both past and present. Women, it was to be shown, were an integral part of the celebration of 1876, but also active and present at the nation’s founding. Through dress, speeches, portraits, and a variety of objects, the WCEC sought to show the public that women had always been visible participants in the nation, and as such they owned part of the historical legacy of the founders. 1 See, “Centennial Tea Party,” Godey’s Lady’s Book, February 1874 for an excellent description of the event. Smadar Shtuhl “For the Love of One’s Country: The Construction of a Gendered Memory in Philadelphia and Montgomery County, 1860-1914.” (Ph.D. Dissertation, Temple University, May 2011). See also, Elizabeth Duane Gillespie, A Book of Remembrance (Philadelphia: JB Lippincott and Company, 1901), 283 – 286. 1 At six PM the guests began to flow into the hall as the doors opened.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN Norman, Oklahoma 2009 SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ________________________ Prof. Paul A. Gilje, Chair ________________________ Prof. Catherine E. Kelly ________________________ Prof. Judith S. Lewis ________________________ Prof. Joshua A. Piker ________________________ Prof. R. Richard Hamerla © Copyright by ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN 2009 All Rights Reserved. To my excellent and generous teacher, Paul A. Gilje. Thank you. Acknowledgements The only thing greater than the many obligations I incurred during the research and writing of this work is the pleasure that I take in acknowledging those debts. It would have been impossible for me to undertake, much less complete, this project without the support of the institutions and people who helped me along the way. Archival research is the sine qua non of history; mine was funded by numerous grants supporting work in repositories from California to Massachusetts. A Friends Fellowship from the McNeil Center for Early American Studies supported my first year of research in the Philadelphia archives and also immersed me in the intellectual ferment and camaraderie for which the Center is justly renowned. A Dissertation Fellowship from the Gilder Lehrman Institute for American History provided months of support to work in the daunting Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library. The Chandis Securities Fellowship from the Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens brought me to San Marino and gave me entrée to an unequaled library of primary and secondary sources, in one of the most beautiful spots on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • David Duncan and His Descendants
    THE STORY OF THOMAS DUNCAN AND HIS SIX SONS BY KATHERINE DUNCAN SMITH (Mrs. J. Morgan Smith) NEW YORK TOBIAS A. WRIGHT, INc. PRINTERS AND PUBLISHERS 1928 FOREWORD ESEARCH in Duucan genealogy was begun in 1894 and has been R carried on industriously to this date through Court records, VVills, Deeds, Bible records and tombstone inscriptions which have furnished proof and have affixed the seal of authenticity to much of the recorded data. Interested kinspeople have contributed from their store of family traditions some of which have been found to agree with certain facts and may be considered true. Many letters have been received, principally from descendants of Daniel and Stephen Duncan, extracts of which appear in this history and are mute evidence of the interest the writers feel in their lineage and their desire to worthily live and teach their chil­ dren to hold to the standard set by their ancestors. That there are errors in this publication there can be no doubt, but not of my making for: "I cannot tell how the truth may be; I say the tale as 'twas said to me." (Sir Walter Scott.) The frequent appearance of my name and the very personal nature of this book is warranted, somewhat, by the fact that all along the thought has been it would be distributed, mainly, among the descendants of Daniel and Stephen Duncan, between whose families there is very close relationship because of the intermar­ riage of many cousins. The stretch of years between 1894 and 1928 is a long one and it is not possible for me to estimate the time I have given to my self-imposed task, but if this book shall meet with favor and be prized by those into whose hands it may fall, the hours, days and weeks devoted to The Story of Thom,,as Dun­ can and His Si.r Sons will be remembered by me as pastime.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Calendar of Events
    CALENDAR OF EVENTS OF EVENTS CALENDAR FEBRUARY 2 — MARCH 30, 2016 2 — MARCH 30, FEBRUARY EIGHT INSPIRED WEEKS OF DISCUSSIONS, PERFORMANCES, AND FILMS 2016 FEATURED TITLES FEATURED 2016 WELCOME 2016 FEATURED TITLES pg 2 WELCOME FROM THE CHAIR pg 3 YOUTH COMPANION BOOKS pg 4 ADDITIONAL READING SUGGESTIONS pg 5 DISCUSSION GROUPS AND QUESTIONS pg 6-7 FILM SCREENINGS pg 8-9 GENERAL EVENTS pg 10 EVENTS FOR CHILDREN, TEENS, AND FAMILIES pg 21 COMMUNITY PARTNERS pg 27 SPONSORS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS pg 30 The centerpiece of 2016 One Book, One Philadelphia is author Charles Frazier’s historical novel Cold Mountain. Set at the end of the Civil War, Cold Mountain tells the heartrending story of Inman, a wounded Confederate soldier who walks away from the horrors of war to return home to his beloved, Ada. Cold Mountain BY CHARLES FRAZIER His perilous journey through the war-ravaged landscape of North Carolina Cold Mountain made publishing history when it topped the interweaves with Ada’s struggles to maintain her father’s farm as she awaits New York Times bestseller list for 61 weeks and sold 3 million Inman’s return. A compelling love story beats at the heart of Cold Mountain, copies. A richly detailed American epic, it is the story of a Civil propelling the action and keeping readers anxiously turning pages. War soldier journeying through a divided country to return Critics have praised Cold Mountain for its lyrical language, its reverential to the woman he loves, while she struggles to maintain her descriptions of the Southern landscape, and its powerful storytelling that dramatizes father’s farm and make sense of a new and troubling world.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainy Quote ~ Benjamin Franklin 026
    Brainy Quote ~ Benjamin Franklin 026 “If you would be loved, love, and be loveable.” ~ Benjamin Franklin 026 ~ Ok “Jika Anda ingin dicintai, mencintailah, dan jadilah seorang yang dapat dicintai.” ~ Benjamin Franklin 026 ~ Ok Apakah Anda ingin dicintai? Mampukah Anda mencintai orang lain sebagaimana Anda ingin dicintai? Tahukah Anda bagaimana cara mencintai? Dapatkah Anda dicintai seperti Anda ingin mencintai orang lain? Mencintai dan dicintai merupakah dua kondisi yang saling mendukung dan berada dalam posisi seimbang. Seseorang yang ingin dicintai maka ia harus mampu mencintai. Demikian juga, seseorang yang mau mencintai, maka ia pun harus dapat dicintai. Demikianlah yang pernah disampaikan Benjamin Franklin, dikenal sebagai Bapak Pendiri Amerika Serikat, berkebangsaan Amerika, hidup dalam rentang tahun 1706-1790, melalui quote-nya, ‘If you would be loved, love, and be loveable.’ Secara bebas diterjemahkan, ‘Jika Anda ingin dicintai, mencintailah, dan jadilah seorang yang dapat dicintai.’ Cintai merupakan dua arah! Saling mencintai merupakan wujud bila kita memiliki cinta dan kita dapat memperoleh cinta. Setiap orang yang dapat saling berbagi dan saling meneguhkan merupakan buah dari cinta sejati. Tidak ada cinta satu arah! Hal yang sulit kita mau mencintai bila kita sendiri tidak mau dicintai. Demikian juga, hal yang mustahil kita memperoleh cinta bila kita pun tidak berniat untuk mencintai. Tuhan telah menganugerahkan cinta kasih kepada manusia. Maka sudah seyogyanya kita mampu mencintai semua ciptaan-Nya, terutama sesama manusia. Orang-orang yang dipenuhi cinta kasih adalah orang-orang kaya, terlepas dari kekayaan harta benda yang dimilikinya. Seseorang yang kaya raya secara materi dan kebendaan, bila ia tidak memiliki cinta kasih, sesungguhnya ia orang yang miskin. Brainy Quote ~ Benjamin Franklin 026 Page 1 Kita mampu mencintai bila kita juga mau dicintai.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaspee Affair As Conspiracy by Lawrence J
    The Gaspee Affair as Conspiracy By Lawrence J. DeVaro, Jr. Rhode Island History, October 1973, pp. 106-121 Digitized and reformatted from .pdf available on-line courtesy RI Historical Society at: http://www.rihs.org/assetts/files/publications/1973_Oct.pdf On the afternoon of June 9, 1772, His Majesty's schooner Gaspee grounded on a shoal called Namquit Point in Narragansett Bay. From the time of their arrival in Rhode Island's waters in February, the Gaspee and her commander, Lieutenant William Dudingston, had been the cause of much commercial frustration of local merchants. Dudingston was insolent, described by one local newspaper as more imperious and haughty than the Grand Turk himself. Past accounts of his pettish nature followed him from port to port.[1] The lieutenant was also shrewd. Aware that owners of seized vessels — rather than navy captains deputized in the customs service — would triumph in any cause brought before Rhode Island's vice-admiralty court, Dudingston had favored the district vice-admiralty court at Boston instead, an option available to customs officials since 1768.[2] Aside from threatening property of Rhode Islanders through possible condemnation of seizures, utilization of the court at Boston invigorated opposition to trials out of the vicinage, a grievance which had irritated merchants within the colony for some time.[3] Finally the lieutenant was zealous — determined to be a conscientious customs officer even if it meant threatening Rhode Island's flourishing illicit trade in non-British, West-Indian molasses. Governor Joseph Wanton of Rhode Island observed that Dudingston also hounded little packet boats as they plied their way between Newport and Providence.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Inimitable? The Afterlives and Cultural Memory of Charles Dickens’s Characters England, Maureen Bridget Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 08. Oct. 2021 1 INIMITABLE? THE AFTERLIVES AND CULTURAL MEMORY OF CHARLES DICKENS’S CHARACTERS Maureen Bridget England King’s College London Candidate Number: 1233164 Thesis for PhD in English Literature 2 This paper is dedicated to the two doctors in my life who inspired me to pursue this dream: Martin England and Jenna Higgins 3 ‘Any successfully evoked character, no matter how apparently insignificant, stands a good chance of surviving its creator.’ David Galef, The Supporting Cast (1993) 4 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson and Franklin
    Jefferson and Franklin ITH the exception of Washington and Lincoln, no two men in American history have had more books written about W them or have been more widely discussed than Jefferson and Franklin. This is particularly true of Jefferson, who seems to have succeeded in having not only bitter critics but also admiring friends. In any event, anything that can be contributed to the under- standing of their lives is important; if, however, something is dis- covered that affects them both, it has a twofold significance. It is for this reason that I wish to direct attention to a paragraph in Jefferson's "Anas." As may not be generally understood, the "Anas" were simply notes written by Jefferson contemporaneously with the events de- scribed and revised eighteen years later. For this unfortunate name, the simpler title "Jeffersoniana" might well have been substituted. Curiously enough there is nothing in Jefferson's life which has been more severely criticized than these "Anas." Morse, a great admirer of Jefferson, takes occasion to say: "Most unfortunately for his own good fame, Jefferson allowed himself to be drawn by this feud into the preparation of the famous 'Anas/ His friends have hardly dared to undertake a defense of those terrible records."1 James Truslow Adams, discussing the same subject, remarks that the "Anas" are "unreliable as historical evidence."2 Another biographer, Curtis, states that these notes "will always be a cloud upon his integrity of purpose; and, as is always the case, his spitefulness toward them injured him more than it injured Hamilton or Washington."3 I am not at all in accord with these conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: the Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Author(S): Hugh R
    Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: The Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Author(s): Hugh R. Slotten Source: History of Education Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, (Autumn, 1991), pp. 323-342 Published by: History of Education Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/368371 Accessed: 02/05/2008 14:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=hes. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We enable the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: The Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Hugh R. Slotten As primary civilizing forces, science and formal education have achieved a position of dominance and prestige in modern society.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia Jane T
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Faculty Publications History 2004 Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia Jane T. Merritt Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Merritt, Jane T., "Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia" (2004). History Faculty Publications. 29. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs/29 Original Publication Citation Merritt, J. T. (2004). Tea trade, consumption, and the republican paradox in prerevolutionary Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Magazine of History & Biography, 128(2), 117-148. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~£f ft"\ THE ~ Pennsylvania ~ OF HMO~YgA~~!r~\~APHY ~~~~~H=:;;;;;;~~~H~H~H~~~ Tea Trade, Consumption, and the Republican Paradox in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia N JANUARY 2, 1774, a usually cool and controlled William Smith 0 wrote heatedly to his trade partners in New York, "Vanderbelt has sent a parcell of his Trash to Town [per] White & Son wh [which] they confess is not good and are hurting us all by offering to fall the price. Mercer & Ramsay & myself have 4 Hhds [Hogsheads] I suppose of the same which am just told are come down ... from New York." He continued indignantly, "IfVanderbelt has Realy been guilty of Mixing his Tea & cannot be made to pay all damages for his Robbing the public & breaking all Mercantile faith, I think we have very little security for the Honor which is always suppos'd to subsist amongst Merchants had the thing happened here & been proved the Offender wd be consider'd in a most dispicable light."1 Smith's indignity over a merchant's lost honor had precedence.
    [Show full text]
  • William Franklin “Frank” Oldham by Toby Echelberry on February 18
    William Franklin “Frank” Oldham By Toby Echelberry On February 18, 1868 history was being made where the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors met to discuss the Incorporation of a new town in the southernmost part of the County to be called Gilroy. Among those signing the petition submitted on February 6th of the same year was a man named William Franklin “Frank” Oldham who would eventually become the one of first Town Trustees to establish the legislative framework of Gilroy. Frank was born on December 16, 1826 in the Greenville District of South Carolina to Garland Oldham and Nancy Stone as the second born of four siblings. The other siblings were Thomas (born 1825), Mary “Polly” Ann (born 1831) and Melissa (born 1883). Frank’s paternal grandfather was Major George Oldham, a Patriot Leader from North Carolina. George Oldham was only a private in the Northern Orange County Regiment of Militia in 1776. George not only had the passion to fight for the freedom of a new nation, but demonstrated himself as being one who had great military prose. George quickly was promoted to Ensign later that year and by 1779 was appointed the rank of Lieutenant in the Caswell County Regiment of Militia and eventually by 1783 to the rank of Colonel. On September 9, 1776, the Provincial Congress had authorized thirty-five County Militia forces to be organized. One of which was the Orange County Regiment of Militia with the original officers in command being Colonel John Hogan, Lieutenant Colonel John Butler, 1st Major William Moore and 2nd Major Nathaniel Rochester.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Resume Ed 049 958 So 000 779 Institution Pub
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 049 958 SO 000 779 AUTHCE Nakosteen, Mehdi TITLE Conflicting Educational Ideals in America, 1775-1831: Documentary Source Book. INSTITUTION Colorado Univ., Boulder. School of Education. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 480p. EDES PRICE EDES Price MF-SC.65 HC-$16.45 DESCRIPTORS *Annotated Bibliographies, Cultural Factors, *Educational History, Educational Legislation, *Educational Practice, Educational Problems, *Educational Theories, Historical Reviews, Resource Materials, Social Factors, *United States History IDENTIFIERS * Documentary History ABSTRACT Educational thought among political, religious, educational, and other social leaders during the formative decades of American national life was the focus of the author's research. The initial objective was the discovery cf primary materials from the period to fill a gap in the history of American educational thought and practice. Extensive searching cf unpublished and uncatalogued library holdings, mainly those of major public and university libraries, yielded a significant quantity of primary documents for this bibliography. The historical and contemporary works, comprising approximately 4,500 primary and secondary educational resources with some surveying the cultural setting of educational thinking in this period, are organized around 26 topics and 109 subtopics with cross-references. Among the educational issues covered by the cited materials are: public vs. private; coed vs. separate; academic freedom, teacher education; teaching and learning theory; and, equality of educational opportunity. In addition to historical surveys and other secondary materials, primary documents include: government documents, books, journals, newspapers, and speeches. (Author/DJB) CO Lir\ 0 CY% -1- OCY% w CONFLICTING EDUCATIONAL I D E A L S I N A M E R I C A , 1 7 7 5 - 1 8 3 1 : DOCUMENTARY SOURCE B 0 0 K by MEHDI NAKOSTEEN Professor of History and Philosophy of Education University of Colorado U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Sketch Of
    Genealogy and Historical Notes of Spamer and Smith Families of Maryland Appendix 2. SSeelleecctteedd CCoollllaatteerraall GGeenneeaallooggiieess ffoorr SSttrroonnggllyy CCrroossss--ccoonnnneecctteedd aanndd HHiissttoorriiccaall FFaammiillyy GGrroouuppss WWiitthhiinn tthhee EExxtteennddeedd SSmmiitthh FFaammiillyy Bayard Bache Cadwalader Carroll Chew Coursey Dallas Darnall Emory Foulke Franklin Hodge Hollyday Lloyd McCall Patrick Powel Tilghman Wright NEW EDITION Containing Additions & Corrections to June 2011 and with Illustrations Earle E. Spamer 2008 / 2011 Selected Strongly Cross-connected Collateral Genealogies of the Smith Family Note The “New Edition” includes hyperlinks embedded in boxes throughout the main genealogy. They will, when clicked in the computer’s web-browser environment, automatically redirect the user to the pertinent additions, emendations and corrections that are compiled in the separate “Additions and Corrections” section. Boxed alerts look like this: Also see Additions & Corrections [In the event that the PDF hyperlink has become inoperative or misdirects, refer to the appropriate page number as listed in the Additions and Corrections section.] The “Additions and Corrections” document is appended to the end of the main text herein and is separately paginated using Roman numerals. With a web browser on the user’s computer the hyperlinks are “live”; the user may switch back and forth between the main text and pertinent additions, corrections, or emendations. Each part of the genealogy (Parts I and II, and Appendices 1 and 2) has its own “Additions and Corrections” section. The main text of the New Edition is exactly identical to the original edition of 2008; content and pagination are not changed. The difference is the presence of the boxed “Additions and Corrections” alerts, which are superimposed on the page and do not affect text layout or pagination.
    [Show full text]