Arxiv:2104.00657V2 [Hep-Th] 16 May 2021 Scales, in the Guise of the Langman-Szabo Duality [11]

Renormalization footprints in the phase diagram of the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model Dragan Prekrat∗ University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics, P.O. Box 44, SR-11001 Belgrade, Serbia (Dated: May 18, 2021) We construct and analyze a phase diagram of a self-interacting matrix field coupled to curvature of the non-commutative truncated Heisenberg space. In the infinite size limit, the model reduces to the renormalizable Grosse-Wulkenhaar’s. The curvature term is crucial to renormalization. When turned off, the triple point collapses into the origin as matrices grow larger. When turned on, the triple point shifts away proportionally to the coupling strength and matrix size. Coupling attenu- ation that renormalizes the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model cannot subdue the shifting, and the translational symmetry-breaking stripe phase escapes to infinity, taking away the problematic UV/IR mixing. I. INTRODUCTION managed to evade the UV/IR mixing. It features a self- interacting real scalar field on the Moyal space equipped We are often challenged to explain what we do in just with a ?-product a few words. What springs to mind in connection to non- i=2 @θ~ @~ µ ν µν commutative QFT is: CERN in Wonderland. A realm f ? g = f e g ) [x ; x ]? = iθ : (2) where space and time behave oddly and the rules are a bit off. As if that were not enough, even the chit-chat1 Its potential is enhanced by the external harmonic oscil- at the Hatter’s tea party seems to be inspired by the lator term of a possible gravitational origin. Namely, the non-commutative quaternions [2]. model can be reinterpreted [15] as that of a scalar field Some seven decades later, non-commutativity (NC) ar- in a curved NC space rived from Wonderland to Quantumland, settling first in Z 2 p 1 2 ξ 2 M 2 Λ 4 the canonical relation between position and momentum SR = g (@φ) − Rφ + φ + φ : (3) and shortly after into NC space-time. It was first invoked 2 2 2 4! in the hope of resolving the confusion about the infinities in the nascent quantum field theory [3], but the trick of The oscillator term, which holds a key to renormalizabil- renormalization beat it to the punch. Since then, it oc- ity, is now seen as a coupling to the curvature of the htr casionally reemerged, both in fundamental and effective underlining truncated Heisenberg algebra form, from condensed matter physics to quantum gravity [µx, µy] = i(1 − µz); (4a) [4,5]. Finally, when NC was discovered in the low energy sector of the string theory at the turn of the millennium [x; z] = +ify; zg; [y; z] = −ifx; zg; (4b) [6], various new NC models followed. The parallel with Wonderland continues in an uncanny projected onto z = 0 section. Another possible source manner. Just as the bites from opposing sides of the of the oscillator term was presented in [16], where it ele- magic mushroom threaten to shrink or stretch Alice in a gantly appears in the expansion of the kinetic term of the runaway fashion, divergencies of non-planar Feynman di- free scalar field that is situated in the Snyder–de Sitter agrams spill from high energy to low energy sector, spoil- space. This model also predicts the running of the cur- ing the renormalizability of NC QFTs [7–10]. And just vature coupling, which is an essential ingredient of the like the problem with the mushroom, UV/IR mixing can GW-renormalizability. It would be interesting to see if be resolved only by proper balancing of large and small similar conclusions could be reached in fuzzy de Sitter arXiv:2104.00657v2 [hep-th] 16 May 2021 scales, in the guise of the Langman-Szabo duality [11]. space as well [17, 18]. Grosse-Wulkenhaar (GW) model [12–14] UV/IR mixing still poses a problem for gauge fields Z 2 2 on NC spaces [19]. Hoping to build on the GW model’s 1 2 Ω −1 2 m 2 λ 4 SGW = (@φ) + ((θ x)φ) + φ + φ (1) success, [20, 21] tried to adapt it to a gauge field on 2 2 2 4! htr. Still, after extensive treatment, we found non- renormalizability lurking in the form of divergent non- local derivative counterterms [22]. Apart from the trivial vacuum, this model contains another, which breaks the ∗ [email protected] 1 “Then you should say what you mean,” the March Hare went translational invariance: on. µ2y µ2x µ “I do,” Alice hastily replied; “at least—at least I mean what I A1 = − ;A2 = + ; φ = : (5) say—that’s the same thing, you know.” g g g “Not the same thing a bit!” said the Hatter. “You might just as well say that ‘I see what I eat’ is the same thing as ‘I eat what This echoes the translational symmetry-breaking stripe I see’!” [1] phase that seems to be at the root of UV/IR mixing. 2 “Stripes” refer to patterns of spatially non-uniform mag- hence their matrix counterparts are netization, which appear when the field oscillates around 1 different values at different points in space [23–25]. They P1 = −Y; P2 = X; P3 = : (8) also seem to shatter the symmetry between large and 2 small scales that keeps the UV/IR mixing at check: lo- These identifications associate (3) with a matrix model cally, vacuum appears ordered, but globally, watched through the lenses of spatial-averaging, it looks smudged 2 2 4 SN = Tr ΦKΦ − crRΦ − c2Φ + c4Φ ; (9) into a disordered zero. It would be interesting to find out what happens with the stripe phase in the GW model. in which the field Φ is a N × N hermitian matrix, K We would like to see how its renormalizability plays out the kinetic operator and R the diagonal curvature of htr from the phase transition point of view. space Phase diagrams on NC spaces have been extensively ( studied in various matrix models, since they regular- 31 16i; i < N; ize corresponding continuum theories in a numerical KΦ = [Pα; [Pα; Φ]];Rii = − (10) 2 8N; i = N: simulation-friendly fashion [26–46]. They generically fea- ture three phases that meet at a triple point. Two are readily present in commutative theories: in the disor- All originally dimensionful quantities are expressed in µ dered phase, field eigenvalues clump around zero, and in units of NC mass scale . We chose the minus sign of c the ordered phase around one of the mirror image-minima the mass term to enable positive 2 to parameterize the c of the potential. The third is a matrix counterpart of the relevant portion of the phase diagram, while positive 4 S NC stripe phase: eigenvalues there gather both around ensures that is bounded from below. They will be ac- positive and negative minimum at the same time. companied by the rescaled model parameters In [44], we started a numerical comparison of the two- c2 c4 c2 = ; c4 = : (11) dimensional GW-model matrix regularization with (R- e N e N on) and without (R-off) the curvature term, focusing mainly on the latter. Here, we wish to present more We performed parallel hybrid Monte Carlo simulations details on the former and to see how it bares under the to measure various thermodynamic observables, most im- oscillator term switching off procedure that ensures the portant being φ4-model’s renormalizability [12]. Since the triple point ? C = Var SN 2 controls the extension of the problematic stripe phase, • heat capacity , we will try to pinpoint its location. • magnetic susceptibility χ = Var jTr Φj N, The paper is organized as follows. We first reintroduce the model and present its detailed N = 24 phase • distributions of eigenvalues and traces of Φ, diagrams. Then we track the R-off triple point as we in- crease the matrix size. Finally, we present the effects of where expectation value hOi and variance Var O of the the curvature coupling variation on the phase diagram, observable O are given by look at the coupled model as we turn the coupling off, R −S dΦ O e 2 2 and compare its limit with the uncoupled one. hOi = ; Var O = O − hOi : (12) R dΦ e−S II. MATRIX MODEL Phase transitions in finite systems form smeared finite peaks and edges in profiles of free energy derivatives. We here continue inspection of the matrix regulariza- Different quantities yield slightly different estimates of tion SN of (3) started in [44]. Let us reintroduce the transition points, but they ultimately converge for large model and walk through its main features. enough matrices. To locate them, we scanned through If the NC strength in htr is set to = 1, coordinates parameter space by varying c2 at fixed c4, which played µx and µy can be represented by finitely-truncated ma- a role of temperature, and searched for peaks in C and trices of the Heisenberg algebra in the energy basis of the χ. harmonic oscillator Classical equation of motion for SN p p 1 ! - 1 ! 2 1 p p i p p 2KΦ − crfR; Φg + Φ −2c2 + 4c4Φ = 0; (13) X = p 1 p 2 ;Y = p 1 p - 2 : (6) 2 . 2 . 2 . 2 . N×N N×N gives us an idea what kind of phases to expect. Its kinetic, Derivatives in model (3), analysed in the frame formal- curvature and pure potential parts are respectively solved by ism, are realised as commutators @µ = [pµ; · ] with mo- menta pµ 8 0; c2 ≤ 0; 2 < p1 p2 p3 1 Φ / 1; Φ = 0; Φ = c2 1 (14) = +µy; = −µx, = µz − ; (7) : ; c2 > 0; iµ iµ iµ 2 2c4 3 The "#-phase is a matrix equivalent of the stripe phase.

Load more