DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Nevada, Reno

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Nevada, Reno University of Nevada, Reno Fine-Grained Volcanic Toolstone Sources and Early Use in the Bonneville Basin of Western Utah and Eastern Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology by David Page Dr. Gary Haynes, Thesis Advisor May 2008 © David Page, 2008 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by DAVID J. PAGE Entitled Fine-Grained Volcanic Toolstone Sources and Early Use in the Bonneville Basin of Western Utah and Eastern Nevada be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS _____________________________________________________________ Gary Haynes, Ph.D., Advisor _____________________________________________________________ David E. Rhode, Ph.D., Committee Member _____________________________________________________________ Kenneth D. Adams, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative _____________________________________________________________ Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Associate Dean, Graduate School May, 2008 i Abstract Identifying lithic sources is central to understanding toolstone use by prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups. The distribution of archaeological materials in relation to geologic sources creates a spatial pattern of use that varies through time. These patterns of distribution in conjunction with analysis of technological organization can be used to infer behavior, especially levels of mobility. This thesis presents geochemical data from a wide-scale sourcing study in the Bonneville basin of western Utah and eastern Nevada. Results of this investigation are presented, including discussion of newly identified geologic source groups and further characterization of previously identified sources, outcome of X-ray fluorescence analysis on approximately 600 fine-grained volcanic (FGV) artifacts from a host of open sites in the Old River Bed delta and from caves/rockshelters including Danger Cave, Bonneville Estates Rockshelter, and Camels Back Cave, and a brief look at how the inhabitants of this region varied FGV-toolstone use through time. ii Acknowledgements Many deserve my thanks. Diet Coke kept me well hydrated in the desert with a little sound of freedom in every can. Dave Rhode kept me employed for many years and motivated when I didn’t think this ride would ever end. Craig Skinner at Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Laboratory extended the “student rate” to yet another begging UNR grad student and also analyzed all of my geologic samples at no cost; all of this with a rapid, if not superhuman turnaround. The Lander Trust provided funding to make this whole thing possible. Rachel Quist at the U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground also provided support, kept me busy with survey projects, and allowed access to extensive archaeological collections. The Utah Museum of Natural History allowed me to source materials from Danger Cave and gave me a free ride in the oldest elevator in Salt Lake. Ted Goebel and the Sundance Archaeological Research Fund provided funding and allowed me to source materials from Bonneville Estates. Daron Duke shared sourcing data and a couple of long truck rides across Nevada, as well as some unsolicited golf advice along the way. My committee, Gary, Dave, and Ken, also put up with a lot and deserve many thanks. Last, but not least, I’m grateful to have a wife who is also my best friend, giving me reason to strive for more. To all I have forgotten, keep on, keeping on. iii Table of Contents ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................ii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research Background................................................................................................... 2 1.11 Toolstone Sourcing........................................................................................ 2 1.12 Lithic Conveyance Zones .............................................................................. 4 1.13 Regional Paleoindian Studies...................................................................... 10 1.2 Research Objectives.................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Structure of the Thesis ................................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 2: CONTEXT.............................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Bonneville Basin Geologic Context............................................................................ 16 2.11 Eastern Great Basin Geology and Volcanism.............................................. 18 2.12 Pleistocene Lake Bonneville and Old River Bed Delta ............................... 22 2.2 Early Bonneville Basin Cultural Context.................................................................... 29 2.21 Select Surface Assemblages ........................................................................ 34 2.211 Old River Bed Delta/Wetland Sites ............................................. 35 2.22 Select Rockshelter/Cave Assemblages ........................................................ 38 2.221 Bonneville Estates Rockshelter.................................................... 38 2.222 Danger Cave................................................................................. 41 2.223 Camels Back Cave........................................................................ 44 2.3 Summary..................................................................................................................... 46 iv CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS OF INVESTIGATION...................................... 48 3.1 Fieldwork and Geologic Sampling ............................................................................. 48 3.2 Sampling Previous Archaeological Collections.......................................................... 51 3.3 XRF Major and Trace Element Analysis.................................................................... 60 3.4 GIS and Spatial Analysis ............................................................................................ 61 3.5 Summary..................................................................................................................... 64 CHAPTER 4: SOURCING RESULTS ......................................................................................... 65 4.1 Geologic Sources of FGV Toolstone.......................................................................... 65 4.11 Eastern Bonneville Basin Sources ............................................................... 66 4.111 Flat Hills Variants......................................................................... 69 4.112 Cedar Mountains Variants ............................................................ 73 4.12 Western Bonneville Basin Sources.............................................................. 79 4.121 Deep Creek Variants..................................................................... 79 4.122 Badlands Variants......................................................................... 84 4.123 Currie Hills Variants..................................................................... 87 4.2 Other FGV Sources.................................................................................................... 88 4.3 Cultural Use of FGV Toolstone.................................................................................. 94 4.31 Surface Assemblages ................................................................................... 95 4.311 Old River Bed Delta Assemblage; Dugway Proving Ground....... 95 4.312 DPG Archaic Assemblage............................................................ 98 4.313 Distal Old River Bed Delta Assemblage; Utah Test and Training Range................................................................ 99 4.32 Rockshelter/Cave Assemblages................................................................. 101 4.321 Bonneville Estates Rockshelter.................................................. 102 4.322 Danger Cave............................................................................... 104 v 4.323 Camels Back Cave...................................................................... 105 4.33 Unknown Sources of FGV......................................................................... 108 4.4 Summary................................................................................................................... 112 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION OF FGV SOURCE USE .............................................................. 113 5.1 Use in Surface Assemblages..................................................................................... 116 5.11 Old River Bed Delta Assemblage; Dugway Proving Ground.................... 116 5.12 Distal Old River Bed Delta Assemblage; Utah Test and Training Range ................................................................... 118 5.13 Archaic Materials;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Deposits of the Deep Creek Mountains, Tooele and Juab Counties, Utah
    Mineral Deposits of the Deep Creek Mountains, Tooele and Juab Counties, Utah by K. C. Thomson UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERALOGICAL SURVEY affiliated with THE COLLEGE OF MINES AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah BULLETIN 99 PRICE $4.50 JUNE 1973 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract .................................... 1 Alaskite Intrusives ....................... 9 Dike Rocks .............................. 9 Introduction ................................. 3 Porphyry Dikes ......................... 9 Previous Work .............................. 3 Rhyolite Dikes ......................... 9 Physical Geography ........................... 3 Aplite Dikes ........................... 9 Andesite Dikes ......................... 9 Mapping and Analytical Techniques .................. 3 Basalt Dikes ...........................9 Pegmatite Dikes ......................... 9 Location of Mining Areas and Properties .............. 4 Extrusive Rocks ........................... 9 Ignimbrite Sequence ...................... 9 General Geology .............................. .4 Andesite ............................... 9 Stratigraphy . 4 Rhyolite .............................. 9 Precambrian Rocks ........................ .4 Tuff ................................. 9 Trout Creek Sequence ................... .4 Other Extrusive Rocks .................... 9 Johnson Pass Sequence ....................5 Structure ................................. 10 Water Canyon Sequence ................... 5 Southern Qifton Block ..................... 10 Cambrian and Precambrian
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenter, R.M., Pandolfi, J.M., P.M. Sheehan. 1986. the Late Ordovian and Silurian of the Eastern Great
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 69 August 1, 1986 The Late Ordovician and Silurian of the Eastern Great Basin, Part 6: The Upper Ordovician Carbonate Ramp Roger M. Carpenter John M. Pandolfi Peter M. Sheehan MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 69 August 1, 1986 The Late Ordovician and Silurian of the Eastern Great Basin, Part 6: The Upper Ordovician Carbonate Ramp Roger M. Carpenter, Department of Geology, Conoco Inc., 202 Rue Iberville, Lafayette, LA 70508; John M. Pandolfi, Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California, 95616; Peter M. Sheehan, Department of Geology, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800W. Wells St., Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 ISBN 0-89326-122-X © 1986 Milwaukee Public Museum Abstract Two east-west transects examined in western Utah and eastern Nevada preserve Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian lithofacies along a carbonate ramp transitional between a shelf and basin. Previous investigators have reconstructed this margin as a classic carbonate shelf with an abrupt, linear margin between shelf and slope. However, lithofacies change gradually between shelf and slope and are better explained by a carbonate ramp model. Intertidal and shallow subtidal dolomites are present to the east, with progressively deeper water limestones with increasing fine grained terrigenous content toward the west. Shelf edge reefs or shallow water carbonate margin buildups are absent. Latest Ordovician glacio-eustatic decline in sea level produced a period ofsubaerial exposure in the shallow eastern region. However, deposition continued deeper on the ramp, where shallow-water, cross laminated, massive dolomites were deposited during the glacio-eustatic regression. The carbonate ramp pattern was disrupted in the Middle or early part of the Late Llandovery, when an abrupt margin was established by listric growth faulting.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Final Report Vol. Ii Regional Heat Flow and Geochemical
    DAVID- D. FINAL REPORT VOL. II REGIONAL HEAT FLOW AND GEOCHEMICAL STUDIES IN SOUTHWEST UTAH Contract: 14-08-0001-G-341 Agency: U.S. Geological Survey Period of Work: June 21, 1976 through August 31, 1978 Grantee: Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Utah Princiapl Investigator: David S. Chapman Co-Investigators: David D. Blackwell William T. Parry Willi am R. Sill Stanley H. Ward James A. Whelan FINAL REPORT VOL II REGIONAL HEAT FLOH AND GEOCHEMICAL STUDIES Irl SOUTHHEST UTft.H Contract: 14-08-0001-G-341 Agency: U.S. Geological Survey Period of work: June 21 7 1976 through August 31, 1978 Grantee: Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah Principal Investigator: David S. Chapman Co Investigators: David 0. Blackwell ~~ i 11 i am T• Parry Hilliam R. Sill Stanley H. Ward James A. ~Jhelan CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT. • • 1 INTRODUCTION. • . 2 HEAT FLOW DATA: SUMMARY 2 HEAT FLOH PROVINCES Arm SUBPROVH·!CES. 3 BASIN AND RANGE - COLORADO PLATEAU TRANSITION • • • • • • • • • • 14 rHNERAL f.'iOUNTAINS - COVE FORT REGION. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 16 REFERENCES •••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 APPENDIX •••• •. • 21 I HEAT FLOW DATA: DETAILS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 21 II ABSTRACTS FROM MEETINGS • . • . • • • • . 1.19 ABSTRACT Sixty t~'lo new heat flow determinations for Utah are reported. Although the spatial distribution of sites is still uneven~ with greatest concentration of sites in southwest Utah where the geothermal energy potential appears to be greatest~ the new sites represent a considerable improvement in representing the regional heat flow patterns. Two broad areas having anomalous high heat flow have been indentified: the northern most of these regions encompasses part of the Deep Creek Mountains~ Spar tltountain and Keg Mountain of west central Utah; the southern most region includes Escalante Desert and Mineral Mountains - Cove Fort areas.
    [Show full text]
  • W9200094.Pdf
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTt1EtJT OF tJATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publ ication No. 42 HYDROLOG IC RECOtJNA , SSANCE OF THE tWRTHERN GREAT SALT LAKE DESERT AND SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE OF NORTHWESTERN UTAH by Jerry C. Stephens, Hydrologist U. S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of ~ater Rights 1974 CONTENTS Page Abstract ...........................................•....................... Introduction ••••.•••.••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 Previous studies and acknowledgments ••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Hydrologic reconnaissance of the northern Great Salt Lake Desert............................................................ 7 Location and general features •••••••••••.•.••••••••••••••••••.•.•.. 7 Hydrology •••••••••• ................................................ 7 Surface water •• ................................................ 7 Ground water ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11 Shallow brine aquifer ••• ................................... 12 Alluvial-fan aquifer ••• .................................... 16 Valley-fill aquifer 20 ot he r aqui fer 5 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 22 Discussion of recharge and discharge estimates ••••••••••••• 23 ~"a te r qua litY••••••• ........................................... 23 Potential for additional water-resources development •• 26 Summary of hydrology of northwestern Utah •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 Surface water .................•..•................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Occurrences in the Emergency Withdrawal Area and Adjacent Lands in the Great Salt Lake Desert
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERAL SURVEY REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 200 MINERAL OCCURRENCES IN THE EMERGENCY WITHDRAWAL AREA AND ADJACENT LANDS IN THE GREAT SALT LAKE DESERT by J. Wallace Gwynn Keith Clem Mike Shubat Bryce Tripp Paul Sturm September 1985 I. Introduction - This mineral report was prepared to fulfill the requirements of PL 94-579 Sec. 204 (c)(2) for the emergency withdrawal of a portion of the Great Salt Lake Desert. This report covers the actual proposed withdrawal area and the surrounding region (fig. 1 and 2) from township 2S to BN and from range 8W to IBW. A legal description of the actual area subject to inundation is contained in a seperate land report. Geologic data was compiled from published and unpublished Utah Geological and Mineral Survey material and other outside sources. Hellmut H. Doelling's 1980 publication, "Geology and mineral resources of Box Elder County, Utah" and Lehi Hintze's 1973 book "Geologic history of Utah" are probably the best general references for this area. No field work was deemed necessary in light of the availability of adequate geological information. II. General Geology Mountain ranges adjacent to areas affected by the West Desert pumping project are dominantly comprised of Paleozoic to lower Mesozoic carbonate rocks (Fig. 3). Rocks of Cambrian through Devonian age represent shallow marine miogeoclinal deposits and are composed of limestone and dolomite with minor sandstone and shale. The thickness of the miogeoclinal rocks ranges from 15,000 to 16,000 feet (Hintze, 1973). Mississippian to lowermost Mesozoic rocks were largely deposited in the Oquirrh Basin and are comprised of interbedded limestone, sandstone, and shale.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Cutthroat Trout Subspecies in the Western Bonneville Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 38 Number 2 Article 5 6-30-1978 Current status of cutthroat trout subspecies in the western Bonneville Basin Terry J. Hickman Colorado State University, Fort Collins Donald A. Duff U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake City, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Hickman, Terry J. and Duff, Donald A. (1978) "Current status of cutthroat trout subspecies in the western Bonneville Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 38 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol38/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CURRENT STATUS OF CUTTHROAT TROUT SUBSPECIES IN THE WESTERN BONNEVILLE BASIN Terry J. Hickman' and Donald A. Duff^ Abstract.— Recent discoveries of native cutthroat trout populations in desert mountain ranges on the western fringe of the Bonneville Basin have prompted intensified management efforts by state and federal agencies. Anal- ysis of Snake Valley cutthroat specimens in Trout Creek, Deep Creek Mountain Range, Utah, indicate this is a pure strain of the trout which once inhabited Pleistocene Lake Bonneville and which was thought to be extinct in Utah. The Snake Valley cutthroat is similar to Salmo clarki Utah of the eastern Bonneville Basin; however, electrophoretic and morphomeristic analysis show unique genetic differences brought about by long-term isolation (8,000 years) from the remainder of the Bonneville Basin cutthroat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of the Deep Creek Mountains of Central Western Utah
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH BIOLOGICAL SERIES Vol. X I January 10, 1955 No. 4 The Birds of The Deep Creek Mountains of Central Western Utah BY WILLIAM H. BEHLE PUBLISHED BY UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY t h e b i r d s o f t h e d e e p c r e e k m o u n t a in s OF CENTRAL WESTERN UTAH BY WILLIAM H. BEHLE In furtherance of a long-time survey of the avifauna of Utah the Deep Creek Mountain region of the central western part of the state was chosen as an area for intensive study. It was expected that gradients would occur in the characters of geographically variable birds between populations from the isolated ranges of the Great Basin and birds from the Wasatch Mountains to the northeast, those mountains that form the abrupt eastern margin of the Great Basin or the high plateaus of central and southern Utah. The Deep Creek region seemed most propitious for collecting a representation of the Great Basin races. While the analysis of the geographical variation was the main objective of the study and large series of the variable birds were desired, in accord with the general practice of making avifaunistic studies of particular regions, samples of other birds were taken when possible, and a study was made of the ecology of the birds of the region. Although the emphasis was on collecting, attention was paid to abundance, behavior, and life history features, as opportunity was afforded. Working out the details of the variation through­ out Utah must await the accumulation of additional material from many other locations, but in the meantime the results of the Deep Creek Mountain survey may well be placed on record to reveal the nature of the avifauna of this portion of Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Margins of Pleistocene Lake Deposits with High- Resolution Seismic Reflection in Pilot Allev Y, Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2008-11-11 Investigating the margins of Pleistocene lake deposits with high- resolution seismic reflection in Pilot alleV y, Utah John V. South Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation South, John V., "Investigating the margins of Pleistocene lake deposits with high-resolution seismic reflection in Pilot alleV y, Utah" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1641. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1641 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE MARGINS OF PLEISTOCENE LAKE DEPOSITS WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION SEISMIC REFLECTION IN PILOT VALLEY, UTAH by John V. South A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University December 2008 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by John V. South This thesis has been read by each member of the following graduate committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Date John H. McBride, Chair Date Stephen T. Nelson Member Date Alan L. Mayo Member BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY As chair of the candidate’s graduate committee, I have read the thesis of John V. South in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographical style are consistent and acceptable and fulfill university and department style requirements; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the graduate committee and is ready for submission to the university library.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1972 Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah George Gregory Francis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Francis, George Gregory, "Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah" (1972). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1684 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWAN PEAK FORMATION AND EUREKA QUARTZITE, NORTHERN UTAH by George Gregory Francis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment· of the' requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology ADDr~d: (5o~ittee Membe;') Deal/of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1972 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Robert Q. Oaks for his technical assistance and inspiration throughout the study. Special thanks are due to Dr. J. Stewart Williams for identification of many Ordovician fossils, and to Dr. Donald R. Olsen and Dr. Williams for care­ ful reading of the manuscript and suggestions for its improvement. AppreCiation is extended to Walter Holmes, Calvin James, Robert Oaks, and Warren Schulingkamp for their assistance and companionship in the field. To Dr. Leo Laporte of Brown University and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Goshute Indian Reservations
    Bureau of Indian Affairs Summary for Ely, Duckwater, and Goshute Indian Reservations ELY SHOSHONE INDIAN RESERVATION LOCATION The Ely Shoshone Indian Reservation (Reservation) is located near the town of Ely in White Pine County, in east central Nevada. The Reservation is comprised of three separate parcels covering approximately 111 acres in the Steptoe Valley hydrographic basin (Exhibit 4502). ESTABLISHMENT OF RESERVATION The Ely Reservation was established by an Act of Congress in 1930 (46 Stat. 820) (Exhibit 4503). Subsequent Acts added lands in 1931 (46 Stat. 1122) (Exhibit 4504) and 1977 (91 Stat. 1406) (Exhibit 4505). All of these lands are held in trust by the United States on behalf of the Ely Shoshone Indian Tribe. The Tribe is pursuing additional lands located southwest and southeast of the existing tribal lands. ENVIRONMENT The Reservation is primarily developed as residential, industrial, or commercial areas. If the Tribe succeeds in obtaining additional trust lands, other land uses may be developed. WATER RESOURCES The Reservation receives its municipal and domestic water from the town of Ely. If the Tribe succeeds in obtaining additional trust lands, other land uses may be pursued that require the Tribe to develop their own water resources. Water Rights The Tribe’s water rights have not been adjudicated by an appropriate court. At present, the Tribe has not developed its own water resources on its current land base. If the Tribe obtains additional trust lands, developed water resources and water rights may be needed to develop the lands. 1 DUCKWATER INDIAN RESERVATION LOCATION The Duckwater Indian Reservation (Reservation) is located in Nye County, Nevada in east central Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1972 Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah George Gregory Francis Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Francis, George Gregory, "Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah" (1972). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1684 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWAN PEAK FORMATION AND EUREKA QUARTZITE, NORTHERN UTAH by George Gregory Francis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment· of the' requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology ADDr~d: (5o~ittee Membe;') Deal/of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1972 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Robert Q. Oaks for his technical assistance and inspiration throughout the study. Special thanks are due to Dr. J. Stewart Williams for identification of many Ordovician fossils, and to Dr. Donald R. Olsen and Dr. Williams for care­ ful reading of the manuscript and suggestions for its improvement. AppreCiation is extended to Walter Holmes, Calvin James, Robert Oaks, and Warren Schulingkamp for their assistance and companionship in the field. To Dr.
    [Show full text]