DOCSLIB.ORG

Astronauts Redefined: the Commercial Carriage of Humans to Space and the Changing Concepts of Astronauts Under International and U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Astronauts Redefined: the Commercial Carriage of Humans to Space and the Changing Concepts of Astronauts Under International and U.S FIU Law Review Volume 10 Number 2 Article 17 Spring 2015 Astronauts Redefined: The Commercial Carriage of Humans to Space and the Changing Concepts of Astronauts under International and U.S. Law Steven A. Mirmina Georgetown University Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/lawreview Part of the Other Law Commons Online ISSN: 2643-7759 Recommended Citation Steven A. Mirmina, Astronauts Redefined: The Commercial Carriage of Humans to Space and the Changing Concepts of Astronauts under International and U.S. Law, 10 FIU L. Rev. 669 (2015). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.10.2.17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Law Review by an authorized editor of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 161 Side A 01/11/2016 08:19:25 14 - MIRMINA_FINAL_1.4.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 1/4/16 6:45 PM Astronauts Redefined: The Commercial Carriage of Humans to Space and the Changing Concepts of Astronauts under International and U.S. Law Steven A. Mirmina* INTRODUCTION On September 16, 2014, NASA announced contracts with Boeing and SpaceX to develop and certify crew transportation systems that will carry astronauts back and forth from the United States to the International Space Station (ISS). These two contracts mark a fundamental turning point in America’s space history; never before has the U.S. Government hired a private company to transport humans to outer space. The international legal structure governing the carriage of humans into space, drafted about fifty years ago, did not fully anticipate private commercial transportation of astronauts. Nor did the U.S. federal law on the subject, which was first drafted in the 1980s and most recently amended about ten years ago. Commercial transportation of astronauts to and from space, referred to within as “commercial crew,” raises novel legal issues. Combined with the advent of suborbital space tourism, popular notions of the term “astronaut” may be changing. This article is being written for a nonprofessional audience—it is written at a high level, general enough to explain the issues to an audience 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 161 Side A 01/11/2016 08:19:25 other than “space lawyers.” The first part of this paper will examine some issues raised by commercial crew and suborbital space tourism under international space law. The second part of this paper will address legal complications raised by commercial crew and suborbital space tourism under U.S. law. Finally, the paper will offer some comments for future consideration. * Professor of Space Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. J.D., University of Connecticut School of Law; LL.M. Leiden University, the Netherlands; LL.M. Georgetown University Law Center, Washington D.C. While the author also works as a lawyer for NASA, the views expressed in this paper are personal to him, and in no way reflect the views of NASA or the U.S. Government. The author would like to express warmest thanks to both Bari Greenfeld of the Army Corps of Engineers and Sabrina Jawed of the FAA for reviewing early drafts of this paper. The author also expresses his sincere appreciation for the generosity of Florida International University and the members of the Law Review for hosting this symposium. C M Y K 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 161 Side B 01/11/2016 08:19:25 14 - MIRMINA_FINAL_1.4.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 1/4/16 6:45 PM 670 FIU Law Review [Vol. 10:669 WHAT WILL “COMMERCIAL CREW”LOOK LIKE? As of the writing of this paper, the detailed design of the first commercial rocket ship transporting humans to the ISS is still not certain. NASA has awarded billions of dollars’ worth of contracts and continues to review the specific designs.1 And as this transportation service changes shape in the future, no one can predict with precision how it will function. For example, will the service be more in the nature of a taxi or a rental car? Anyone who has taken a taxi knows that a professional driver “pilots” the vehicle, while “passengers” ride in the back.2 The professional driver is responsible for transporting passengers where they need to go. However, another option is the “rental car” model. If this type of service is offered, the rental car company prepares a vehicle and a “driver” hops in and pilots the car away. Of course, this model assumes that drivers have met some minimum level of training (e.g., in the form of a driver’s license) in addition to receiving additional training from the rental car company before boarding the vehicle (e.g., where to find the turn signals, how to operate the radio and GPS system, and how to call for emergency assistance). A third possibility may involve a space ship which carries humans into space while being remotely-controlled by an operator on the ground. In other words, passengers only need to board the vehicle, while “pilots” on the ground control the vehicle during launch, landing, and on orbit, using a (very complicated) joystick. COMMERCIAL CREW AND INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW These three scenarios (the taxi, the rental car, and the remotely- controlled vehicle) collectively have the potential to call into question the 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 161 Side B 01/11/2016 08:19:25 very nature of the word “astronaut.” “Astronaut” is a word that, for many, evokes a vivid mental picture. One might think of a pressurized suit with various and sundry dials, a sturdy helmet and face mask (with a cool solar visor that lifts up), and perhaps some really thick gloves—so thick it would be hard to make a fist. One might also associate certain adjectives with the profession “astronaut:” well-trained; dedicated; intelligent; overall, someone with “the right stuff.”3 Unfortunately, the international legal regime does not provide a precise 1 See The US Will Spend $6.8 Billion Hiring Boeing and SpaceX to Build New Spacecraft, NEXTGOV, http://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2014/09/us-will-spend-68-billion-hiring-boeing-and -spacex-build-new-spacecraft/94316/?oref=nextgov_today_nl (last visited Jan. 12, 2015). 2 The word “passengers” is being used specifically to avoid using the word “crew” which is a term of art and will be addressed subsequently. 3 THE RIGHT STUFF (The Ladd Company 1983) (detailing the story of the original Mercury 7 astronauts). C M Y K 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 162 Side A 01/11/2016 08:19:25 14 - MIRMINA_FINAL_1.4.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 1/4/16 6:45 PM 2015] Astronauts Redefined 671 definition. The Outer Space Treaty (OST) speaks of “astronauts” in its fifth article, but never defines the term.4 The Treaty requires that States “shall regard astronauts as envoys of mankind” and furthermore that States will “render to them all possible assistance” if there is an accident or emergency landing. Certainly, an “envoy of mankind” is an enviable distinction (presumably higher than an Ambassador or Diplomat, which would be considered an envoy of only one nation). The OST was followed a year later by another treaty focused, in part, on rescuing astronauts and returning them to the state that registered the launch vehicle—namely, the Rescue and Return Agreement.5 This Treaty also does nothing to define the term “astronaut.” In fact, it seems to cause additional ambiguity. While the term “astronauts” is used twice in the title and twice in the Preamble, the term does not appear again in the operative text of the Treaty. Rather, the operative text lays out duties that run to “personnel of a spacecraft.” Thus, if “personnel of a spacecraft” have an accident, emergency or unintended landing in territory under the jurisdiction of a Contracting Party, then that State “shall immediately take all possible steps to rescue them and render them all necessary assistance.”6 That State also must notify the launching authority as well as the Secretary General of the U.N. of the steps it is taking to affect a prompt rescue. It is reasonable to inquire why the Rescue and Return Agreement did not use the term “astronaut.” Did the drafters intend to use a broader term?7 And, why would it make a difference? One distinction could be that not all space travelers (or “personnel of a spacecraft”) have been professional astronauts. Historically, numerous non-professional astronauts have gone into 37333-fiu_10-2 Sheet No. 162 Side A 01/11/2016 08:19:25 space. Some of those include: a teacher in space (Christa McAuliffe); an American engineer/investment manager (Dennis Tito); a U.S. Senator (Bill Nelson); a Saudi Arabian Sultan (and first Arab and Muslim in space, 4 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, art. 5, Oct. 10, 1967, U.N.T.S. vol. 610, No. 8843 [hereinafter Outer Space Treaty or OST]. 5 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, Apr. 22, 1968, U.N.T.S. vol. 672, No. 9574 [hereinafter Rescue & Return Agreement]. 6 Rescue & Return Agreement, supra note 5, at art. 2. 7 In the travaux preparatoires, there is widespread documentation that the Rescue and Return Agreement was hastily drafted. For more on this, see the discussion in Mark Sundahl, The Duty to Rescue Space Tourists and Return Private Spacecraft, 35 J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Videncee from an Analog Environment
    Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 25 Number 1 JAAER Fall 2015 Article 2 Fall 2015 Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment Kenny M. Arnaldi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Guy Smith Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Jennifer E. Thropp Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Other Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Arnaldi, K. M., Smith, G., & Thropp, J. E. (2015). Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/ 10.15394/jaaer.2015.1676 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arnaldi et al.: Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Evidence From an Analog Environment Introduction Four years after the launch of Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite, Yuri Gagarin became the first human to reach space (National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA], 2011a). The United States soon followed on the path of manned space exploration with Project Mercury. Although this program began with suborbital flights, manned spacecraft were subsequently launched into orbit around the Earth (NASA, 2012). With President Kennedy setting the goal of landing a man on the moon, NASA focused on short-duration orbital flights as a stepping-stone to lunar missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Remembered
    July 2015 Vol. 2 No. 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine FOREVER REMEMBERED Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond NASA’S National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCH KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: July 3, 12:55 a.m. EDT Mission: Progress 60P Cargo Craft CONTENTS Description: In early July, the Progress 60P resupply vehicle — 4 �������������������Solemn shuttle exhibit shares enduring lessons an automated, unpiloted version of the Soyuz spacecraft that is used to ����������������Flyby will provide best ever view of Pluto 10 bring supplies and fuel — launches 14 ����������������New Horizons spacecraft hones in on Pluto to the International Space Station. http://go.nasa.gov/1HUAYbO 24 ����������������Firing Room 4 used for RESOLVE mission simulation Date: July 22, 5:02 p.m. EDT 28 ����������������SpaceX, NASA will rebound from CRS-7 loss Mission: Expedition 44 Launch to 29 ����������������Backup docking adapter to replace lost IDA-1 the ISS Description: In late July, Kjell SHUN FUJIMURA 31 ����������������Thermal Protection System Facility keeping up Lindgren of NASA, Kimiya Yui of JAXA and Oleg Kononenko of am an education specialist in the Education Projects and 35 ����������������New crew access tower takes shape at Cape Roscosmos launch aboard a Soyuz I Youth Engagement Office. I work to inspire students to pursue science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or 36 ����������������Innovative thinking converts repair site into garden spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan to the STEM, careers and with teachers to better integrate STEM 38 ����������������Proposals in for new class of launch services space station.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM SPACE TOURISTS to UNRULY PASSENGERS? the US STRUGGLE with ‘ON-ORBIT JURISDICTION’ Frans G
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Law, College of Program Faculty Publications 2014 From Space Tourists to Unruly Passengers? The U.S. Struggle with "On-Orbit Jurisdiction" F. G. von der Dunk University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw Part of the Air and Space Law Commons von der Dunk, F. G., "From Space Tourists to Unruly Passengers? The .SU . Struggle with "On-Orbit Jurisdiction"" (2014). Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications. 81. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/81 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. IAC-14,E7,4.2x21779 FROM SPACE TOURISTS TO UNRULY PASSENGERS? THE US STRUGGLE WITH ‘ON-ORBIT JURISDICTION’ Frans G. von der Dunk University of Nebraska-Lincoln, College of Law, Space, Cyber and Telecommunications Law Program [email protected] Abstract With the first proper commercial sub-orbital ‘space tourist’ flights seemingly around the corner, the need to develop a proper legal system addressing all relevant parameters, scenarios and events also arises more visibly. This is particularly true for the United States, where so far the major developments in private manned spaceflight are concentrated, some of which may soon move from relatively straightforward up-and-down sub-orbital trajectories to longer-duration sub- orbital and/or orbital flights, or even long-duration presence in (potentially private) space stations.
    [Show full text]
  • International Legal Regulation of Space Tourism
    International Legal Regulation of Space Tourism Irina Rуzhenko1 Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Kherson State University (Kherson, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9208-2132 Olena Halahan2 Senior lecturer, Kherson State Maritime Academy (Kherson, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-6965 Rуzhenko, Irina, and Olena Halahan (2020) International Legal Regulation of Space Tourism. Advanced Space Law, Volume 5, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2020/5/8 The article analyzes the state of legal regulation of the process of organization and implementation of space tourism, defines the features of its application and its place in modern international space law. The legal norms in the field of space travel and the legal bases of their organization were analyzed. An attempt to analyze the legal status of persons taking part in space missions was made. The issue of the international legal personality of the participants of the space tourist service contract was investigated. Particular attention was paid to the legal status of space tourists. The content of the definition of “cosmonauts as messengers of humanity into space” was analyzed. The issues of the risks inherent in space tourism activities and the international legal liability of the parties to the space tourist services contract were considered. It has been stated that a space traveler has a certain amount of rights and obligations throughout the period, from the beginning of preparation to the journey and ending with the period after returning to Earth. An indicative list of space tourists’ rights has been restated, and examples of their obligations and limitations in time and space have been provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive No Moving Parts Capillary Solutions for Spacecraft Life Support Systems
    49th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2019-203 7-11 July 2019, Boston, Massachusetts Passive no moving parts capillary solutions for spacecraft life support systems Mark M. Weislogel1 and Ryan M. Jenson2 IRPI LLC, Portland, Oregon, 97223 Life support systems for plant, animal, and crew habitats are replete with the challenges of managing poorly wetting aqueous solutions in a low-g environment. A brief review of noteworthy on-orbit system failures provides ample renewed motivation to understand microgravity capillary phenomena to the point such failures may be avoided in the future. Historic and recent NASA-funded low-g experiments are highlighted that greatly expand our experience base and comfort level to prepare for and preferably exploit capillary forces. Our specific aim is to replace the passive role of gravity on earth with the combined passive roles of surface tension, wetting, and container geometry in space. We demonstrate a general approach highlighting high-TRL examples pertinent to urine collection and processing. From this specific example we demonstrate more specific applications to passive in-line separator devices, beverage cups, and bio-sample de-bubblers. Broader applications can be made to other challenging processes such as brine drying, condensing heat exchangers, liquid sorbent CO2 scrubbers, wet lab unit operations, and habitats for plants and animals. I. Introduction n earth, we take it for granted how gravity passively separates gases from liquids. In space, however, without O buoyancy, nearly all fluids to various degrees become mixtures of gases and liquids that can be difficult to re- separate. In other words, most fluid systems aboard spacecraft are or become multiphase fluid systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Da 03 09 2015.Pdf
    EXPEDITION 45 L'EQUIPAGE Scott J. KELLY (Commandant de bord) EXPEDITION 43/44/45/46 Départ: Soyuz TMA-16M le 27/03/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-18M le 02/03/2016 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 21/02/1964 à Orange (New Jersey). Marié et 2 enfants. Etudes: Bachelier en ingénierie (State University of New York Maritime College), Maîtrise en systèmes avioniques (University of Tennessee) NASA Sélection: Intégre le Groupe 16 le 01/05/1996 Précédents vols: STS-103 (07 jours 23:11 en décembre 1999) STS-118 (12 jours 17:56 en août 2007) Expedition 26 (159 jours 08:44 d'octobre 2010 à avril 2011) Mikhail B. KORNIYENKO (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 43/44/45/46 Départ: Soyuz TMA-16M le 27/03/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-18M le 02/03/2016 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 15/04/1960 à Syzran (Russie). Marié et 1 enfant. Etudes: Graduat en ingénierie (Moscow Aviation Institute) ROSKOSMOS Sélection: Intégre le RKKE-14 le 24/02/1998 Précédents vols: Expedition 23/24 (176 jours 01:19 d'avril à septembre 2010) L'EQUIPAGE Oleg D. KONONENKO (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 44/45 Départ: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/07/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/12/2015 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 21/06/1964 à Chardzhou (Turkmenistan). Marié, 2 enfants. Etudes: Graduat en ingénierie mécanique (Kharkov Aviation Institute), Graduat en ingénierie mécanique (Kuibyshev Aviation Institute) ROSKOSMOS Sélection: Intégre le TsPK-12 le 29/03/1996 Précédents vols: Expedition 17 (198 jours 16:20 d'avril à octobre 2008) Expedition 30/31 (192 jours 18:58 de novembre 2011 à juillet 2012) Kimiya Yui (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 44/45 Départ: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/07/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/12/2015 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 30/01/1970 à Nagano (Japon).
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking a Human Spaceflight Program Worthy of a Great Nation
    SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION Review of U.S. HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT Plans Committee Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee 1 SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION 2 Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION “We choose...to do [these] things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard...” John F. Kennedy September 12, 1962 Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee 3 SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION Table of Contents Preface .......................... ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ..... ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2.0 U.S. Human Spaceflight: Historical Review ............................................................................ 27 Chapter 3.0 Goals and Future Destinations for Exploration ........................................................................ 33 3.1 Goals for Exploration ............................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Overview of Destinations and Approach .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Plan
    SEPTEMBER 2020 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE AUGUST 2020 SECTION MEETING: BIOINSPIRATION, BIOM IMETICS, AND DRONES. Mostafa Hassanalian, PhD. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Autonomous Flight and Aquatic Systems Laboratory (AFASL), New Mexico Tech SECTION CALENDAR 2 NATIONAL AIAA EVENTS 2 ALBUQUERQUE SEPTEMBER MEETING 3 UNM MECHANICAL ENGINEERING NEWS 4 STUDENT BRANCH NEWS 5 SCHOLARSHIP & GRADUATE AWARDS 6 HONORS & AWARDS 7 STAFFORD AIR & SPACE MUSEUM 8 JUL — SEP IN AIR & SPACE HISTORY 10 IMAGES OF THE QUARTER 15 SECTION INFORMATION 16 In the section’s second virtual meeting (via ZOOM) Dr. Hassanalian spoke about NM Tech’s research that involves using biomimicry to solve many complex tasks in aerospace applications. Nature’s biological sys- tems already deal with issues such as drag reduction techniques, lo- comotion, navigation, control, and sensing. Today, there is a growing need for flying drones with diverse capabilities for both civilian and military applications. There is also a significant interest in the devel- NEXT MEETINGS: opment of novel drones, which can autonomously fly in different envi- ronments and locations and can perform various missions. In the THIS MONTH: past decade, the broad spectrum of applications of these drones has 24 September. See page 3. received a great deal of attention, which led to the invention of a NEXT MONTH: large variety of drones of different sizes and weights. Depending on the flight missions of the drones, the size and type of installed equip- 16 October – Dr. Paul Delgado, SNL – “Low Speed Wind Tunnel ment are different.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Space the Moon Mars Earth Gravity Radiation Primary Atmosphere Temperature
    Introduction Abstract Introduction Isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments exist as the inhabited areas of the Isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments are the most universally challenging Earth or the space above it that pose the greatest challenges to human health. Individuals places in which anyone could attempt to survive, but can provide enormous scientific and can survive in these places, but the environments present inherently challenging conditions economic benefits for those who do live and work within them. The harsh environmental that make survival difficult or even dangerous. The most familiar extreme environments are conditions and psychological difficulties experienced within ICE environments currently limits considered the open desert, the ocean, and the poles. These are areas with harsh weather the amount of time individuals can spend at Earth’s poles, at sea, or in space to roughly and almost no potable water, and they offer very little in terms of shelter. a year. Enabling humans to survive for a longer duration while remaining physically and The most immediate threats are physical in the form of environmental conditions psychologically healthy is the central goal of architecture for ICE environments. or the vacuum of space, which could prove lethal. Drilling platforms must deal with high These environments offer access to resources such as oil and gas and enable seas and polar research stations must allow for survival through long winters without unique scientific exploration and discovery. Addressing the difficulties those living in outside assistance. The necessity of dealing with one’s physical environment is paramount; ICE environments face will increase overall productivity and health.
    [Show full text]
  • SEEC-2016-General-Information.Pdf
    Tranquility Foundation, in partnership with Tranquility Masonic Lodge and in keeping with Freemasonry’s historic support of public education, proudly sponsors teachers attending this year’s Space Exploration Educators Conference. Thanks to each of you for teaching the next generation of space SEEC is a unique opportunity for educators from around the Globe to meet up and find out what is happening in the Space Program and how they can share the excitement of space with their students. After attending the 22nd Annual Space Exploration Educators Conference you will go home recharged and ready to ignite the minds of your students! Network with the top scientists, engineers and educators from the United States, Canada, and Japan. Hear Keynotes by leaders in the space program. Collect exciting materials to inspire your students and enhance your classroom. Hear from astronauts and engineers currently working on space exploration. Earn up to 24 Professional Development hours. Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016 3-6 p.m. Early bird check-in Tour our new Independence Plaza Exhibit, brought to you by Boeing Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016 7:15 a.m. Check-in begins 7:45 a.m. SEEC 101 (A must for all new attendees to SEEC) in Blast-Off! Theater 8:30 a.m. Welcome address and keynote (Space Center Theater)– John Horack 10:15-11:30 a.m. First session (60 min) 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Lunch buffet in Astronaut Gallery Book signing- Astronaut Clay Anderson (Space trader gift shop) 12:45-2:15 p.m. Second session (90 min) 2:45-4:15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-15-706, Federal Aviation Administration: Commercial Space
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science, Space and Technology, House of Representatives August 2015 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Commercial Space Launch Industry Developments Present Multiple Challenges GAO-15-706 August 2015 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Commercial Space Launch Industry Developments Present Multiple Challenges Highlights of GAO-15-706, a report to the Chairman, Committee on Science, Space and Technology, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. commercial space launch During the last decade, U.S. companies conducted fewer orbital launches in total industry has changed considerably than companies in Russia or Europe, which are among their main foreign since the enactment of the Commercial competitors. However, the U.S. commercial space launch industry has expanded Space Launch Amendments Act of recently. In 2014, U.S. companies conducted 11 orbital launches, compared with 2004. FAA is required to license or none in 2011. In addition, in 2014, U.S. companies conducted more orbital permit commercial space launches, but launches than companies in Russia, which conducted four, or Europe, which to allow the space tourism industry to conducted six. develop, the act prohibited FAA from regulating crew and spaceflight The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—which is responsible for protecting participant safety before 2012—a the public with respect to commercial space launches, including licensing and moratorium that was later extended but permitting launches—faces multiple challenges in addressing industry will now expire on September 30, developments. If Congress does not extend the regulatory moratorium beyond 2015. Since October 2014, there have September 2015, FAA will need to determine whether and when to regulate the been three mishaps involving FAA safety of crew and spaceflight participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Eva-Exp-0031 Baseline
    EVA-EXP-0031 BASELINE National Aeronautics and EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/18/2018 Space Administration EVA OFFICE EXTRAVEHICULAR ACTIVITY (EVA) AIRLOCKS AND ALTERNATIVE INGRESS/EGRESS METHODS DOCUMENT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 2 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE Revision Change Description Release No. No. Date EVA-EXP-0031 Baseline Baseline per CR# EVA-CR-00031 04/18/2018 Document dated 03/07/2018 submitted and approved through DAA process/DAA # TN54054 approved April 9, 2018 EVA-REF-001 DAA Pre Baseline 03/12/2015 33134 Draft EVA-RD-002 05/14/2015 SAA 12/15/2015 DRAFT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 3 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document Executive Summary This document captures the currently perceived vehicle and EVA trades with high level definition of the capabilities and interfaces associated with performing an Extravehicular Activity (EVA) using an exploration EVA system and ingress/egress methods during future missions. Human spaceflight missions to Cislunar space, Mars transit, the moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos), the Lunar surface, and the surface of Mars will include both microgravity and partial-gravity EVAs, and potential vehicles with which an exploration EVA system will need to interface.
    [Show full text]