DOCSLIB.ORG

RAMP-2 in Adamawa State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAMP-2 in Adamawa State ESMP for the Prioritized 200km of Rural Roads to be Constructed/Rehabilitated under RAMP-2 in Adamawa State RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP-2) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT FOR Public Disclosure Authorized The Review and Update of Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) for the Prioritized 200km of Rural Roads to be Constructed/Rehabilitated under RAMP-2 in Adamawa State LOT 1, 2 & 3 Public Disclosure Authorized EYITOPE JOHN AJAYI July 2015 i | Page ARAP for the Prioritized 200km of Rural Roads to be Constructed/Rehabilitated under RAMP-2 in Adamawa State Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Conditions for preparation of ARAP .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Rationale ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Justification and Scope of ARAP update ............................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Scope of Works ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Project Area .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Methodology of Study ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Constraints to Work ..................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................................................................7 2.0. Institutional and Legal Framework for Involuntary Resettlement .......................................................................7 2.1 World Bank Safeguard Policies .................................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 World Bank Safeguard Policy- Involuntary Resettlement OP 4.12 ..............................................................7 2.2 Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................................................7 2.2.1. Employee Compensation Act, 2010 .............................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Nigerian Land Use Act of 1978 .................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Comparison between the Land Use Act of 1978 and World Bank Safeguard policy ................................ 8 2.2.4 Entitlement Policy and Matrix .................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 Overview of the Project Environment ....................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Baseline Socio-economic Conditions .......................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Population and Housing Patterns ....................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Identification of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) .................................................................................... 12 3.3 Discussion of Project Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1. Negative impacts in the Project Area ....................................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Impact Avoidance Measures Undertaken...................................................................................................... 14 3.3.3. Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.4. Census of Project Affected Persons .............................................................................................................. 14 3.3.5. Category of PAPs ....................................................................................................................................... 15 3.5 PAP’s and Affected Assets ..................................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 4.0 Eligibility, Valuation and Compensation ..................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Eligibility Criteria for Various Categories of Project Affected Persons ..................................................... 19 4.1.1. Entitlement ......................................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.2. Eligibility ............................................................................................................................................. 20 4.2. Assets Valuation and Methodology ................................................................................................................. 22 ii | Page ARAP for the Prioritized 200km of Rural Roads to be Constructed/Rehabilitated under RAMP-2 in Adamawa State 4.2.1. Valuation of Physical Structures ............................................................................................................... 22 4.2.2. Valuation of economic plants ................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.3. Valuation methodology for compensation ...................................................................................... 24 4.2.4. Payment of Compensation ................................................................................................................ 25 Vulnerable/ Marginalized Groups during ARAP census ..................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER FIVE .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 5.1. Limitations to ARAP in Lot 2............................................................................................................................. 36 5.2 Affected assets along Adamawa RAMP2 roads in Lot 2 ................................................................................. 42 5.3 Guide for Mitigation measures for Social Impacts identified in Lot 2 ........................................................ 43 5.3.1. PAPs Losing Communal Land and Structures .......................................................................................... 43 Valuation methodology for compensation in Lot 2 .......................................................................................... 44 5.3.2. PAPs Losing Agricultural Land and Crops ........................................................................................ 45 5.3.3 PAPs requiring Relocation Assistance .............................................................................................. 45 5.3.4. Vulnerable PAPs ....................................................................................................................................... 45 5.5 Eligibility Criteria for Affected Persons ................................................................................................. 46 5.4. Grievance Redress Mechanism in Lot 2 ............................................................................................................... 46 5.4.2. Economic trees ......................................................................................................................................... 46 5.5. ARAP Implementation in Lot 2 ............................................................................................................................. 47 5.6. Monitoring Indicators .................................................................................................................................... 47 CHAPTER SIX ................................................................................................................................................................ 48 6.0 Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................................................... 48 6.1 International Stakeholders ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • CPSWG RESPONSE DASHBOARD - ADAMAWA STATE - Quarter 1, 2019 Child Protection Sub Working Group, Nigeria
    CPSWG RESPONSE DASHBOARD - ADAMAWA STATE - Quarter 1, 2019 Child Protection Sub Working Group, Nigeria YobeCASE MANAGEMENT REACH BY LGA PSYCHOSOCIALYobe SUPPORT SERVICES (PSS) REACH BY LGA 78% 14% Madagali ± Madagali ± Borno Borno Michika Michika 86% 10% 82% 16% Mubi North Mubi North Hong 100% Mubi South 5% Hong Gombi 100% 100% Gombi 10% 27% Mubi South Shelleng Shelleng Guyuk Song 0% Guyuk Song 0% 0% Maiha 0% Maiha Chad Chad Lamurde 0% Lamurde 0% Nigeria Girei Nigeria Girei 36% 81% 11% 96% Numan 0% Numan 0% Yola North Demsa 100% Demsa 26% Yola North 100% 0% Adamawa Fufore Yola South 0% Yola South 100% Fufore Mayo-Belwa Mayo-Belwa Adamawa Local Government Area Local Government (LGA) Target Area (LGA) Target LGA TARGET LGA TARGET Demsa 1,170 DEMSA 78 Fufore 370 Jada FUFORE 41 Jada Ganye 0 GANYE 0 Girei 933 GIREI 16 Gombi 4,085 State Boundary GOMBI 33 State Boundary Guyuk 0 GUYUK 0 LGA Boundary Hong 16,941 HONG 6 Ganye Ganye LGA Boundary Jada 0 JADA 0 Not Targeted Lamurde 839 LAMURDE 6 Not Targeted Madagali 6,321 MADAGALI 119 % Reach Maiha 2,800 MAIHA 12 % REACH Mayo-Belwa 0 0 MAYO - BELWA 0 0 Michika 27,946 Toungo 0% MICHIKA 232 Toungo 0% 1 - 36 Mubi North 11,576 MUBI NORTH 154 1 - 5 Mubi South 11,821 MUBI SOUTH 139 37 - 78 Numan 2,250 NUMAN 14 6 - 11 Shelleng 0 SHELLENG 0 79 - 82 12 - 16 Song 1,437 SONG 21 Teungo 25 83 - 86 TOUNGO 6 17 - 27 Yola North 1,189 YOLA NORTH 14 Yola South 2,824 87 - 100 YOLA SOUTH 47 28 - 100 SOCIO-ECONOMICYobe REINTEGRATION REACH BY LGA MINEYobe RISK EDUCATION (MRE) REACH BY LGA Madagali Madagali R 0% I 0% ±
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Economics of Fresh and Smoked Fish Marketing in Some Local Government Areas in Adamawa State, Nigeria
    COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH MARKETING IN SOME LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS IN ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA. ONYIA, L.U., ADEBAYO, E.F., ADEWUYI, K.O., EKWUNIFE, E.G., OCHOKWU,I.J, OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION • INTRODUCTION • MATERIALS AND METHODS • RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS • CONCLUSIONS • RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION ü FISH IS A MAJOR SOURCE OF ANIMAL PROTEIN, ü ESSENTIAL FOOD ITEM IN THE DIET OF NIGERIANS (JIM-SAIKI AND OGUNBADEJO, 2003), ü AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF LIFE AND LIVELIHOODS FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD AND FOR THAT MATTER THE SELECTED COMMUNITIES, ü PROVIDES A SPENDABLE INCOME FOR MANY FAMILIES IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD (JERE AND MWENDO-PEHIRI, 2004). INTRODUCTION CONTINUED v IN NIGERIA, FISH IS SOLD TO CONSUMERS AS: ü FROZEN OR ICED, ü CURED (SMOKED), ü SUN DRIED, ü FRESH EITHER FROM A CULTURED POND OR FROM THE WILD. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY • TO IDENTIFY SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FISH MARKETERS • TO COMPARE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH ENTERPRISES IN THE STUDY AREAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS THE STUDY AREA ü SEVEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF ADAMAWA STATE (NGURORE, YOLA SOUTH, YOLA NORTH, GIREI, DEMSA, FUFORE AND NUMAN) WERE RANDOMLY SELECTED BASED ON THEIR PROXIMITY TO THE FISH LANDING SITES, ü DATA COLLECTED THROUGH WELL-STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH MARKETERS FROM 7 MARKETS, ü 286 QUESTIONNAIRES WERE RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE FISH MARKETERS. METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS • DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS IN TERMS OF FREQUENCIES AND PERCENTAGES • GROSS MARGIN ANALYSIS WAS USED TO DETERMINE
    [Show full text]
  • LGA Demsa Fufore Ganye Girei Gombi Guyukk Hong Jada Lamurde
    LGA Demsa Fufore Ganye Girei Gombi Guyukk Hong Jada Lamurde Madagali Maiha Mayo Belwa Michika Mubi North Mubi South Numan Toungo Shellenge Song Yola North Yola South PVC PICKUP ADDRESS Along Gombe Road, Demsa Town, Demsa Local Govt. Area Gurin Road, Adjacent Local Govt. Guest House, Fufore Local Govt. Area Along Federal Government College, Ganye Road, Ganye Lga Adjacent Local Govt. Guest Road, Girei Local Govt. Area Sangere Gombi, Aong Yola Road, Gombi L.G.A Palamale Nepa Ward Guyuk Town, Guyuk Local Govt. Area Opposite Cottage Hospital Shangui Ward, Hong Local Govt. Area Old Secretariat, Jada Along Ganye Road, Jada Lafiya Lamurde Road, Lamurde Local Govt. Area Palace Road, Gulak, Near Gulak Police Station, Madagali Lga Behind Local Govt. Secretariat, Mayonguli Ward, Maiha Jalingo Road Near Maternity Mayo Belwa Lga Michika Bye-Pass Zaibadari Ward Michika Lga Inside Local Govt. Secretariat, Mubi North Lumore Street, Opposite District Head's Palace, Gela, Mubi South Councilors Quarters, Off Jalingo Road, Numan Lga Barade Road, Oppoiste Sss Office, Toungo Old Local Govt Secretariat Street, Shelleng Town, Shelleng Lga Opp. Cattage Hospital Yola Road, Song Local Govt. Area No. 7 Demsawo Street, Demsawo Ward, Yola North Lga Yola Bye-Pass Fufore Road Opp. Aliyu Mustapha College, Bako Ward, Yola Town, Yola South Lga Yola Bye-Pass Fufore Road Opp. Aliyu Mustapha College, Bako Ward, Yola Town, Yola South Lga.
    [Show full text]
  • Adamawa - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020)
    Nigeria: Adamawa - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020) Number of Local Reporting PARTNERS PER TYPE Government Area Partners OF ORGANIZATIONS BREAKDOWN OF PEOPLE REACHED PER CATEGORY NGOs/UN People Reached PiN/Target IDP Returnee Host Agencies Community 21 Partners14 including 230,996 LGAs with ongoing International NGOs and activities 95,764 13,922 1,268 80,573 UN Agencies 11/3 212,433 DEMSA (4 Partners) MICHIKA (6 Partners) FSACI, IOM, JHF, WHO GZDI, IRC, JHF, PLAN, WHO, ZSF MADAGALI REACHED: 6,070 REACHED: 6,578 FUFORE (4 Partners) MUBI NORTH (7 Partners) MICHIKA GDZI, IOM, JHF, LESGO, PLAN, IOM, JHF, UNICEF, WHO SWOGE, WHO REACHED: 17,309 REACHED: 6,924 MUBI NORTH GANYE (2 Partners) MUBI SOUTH (6 Partners) HONG JHF GDZI, IOM, JHF, LESGO, RHHF, ZSF GOMBI MUBI SOUTH REACHED: - REACHED: 4,090 GIREI (4 Partners) NUMAN (1 Partner) SHELLENG JHF AGUF, IOM, JHF, WHO MAIHA REACHED: 22,348 REACHED: - SONG GUYUK GOMBI (3 Partners) SHELLENG (1 Partner) JHF GDZI, JHF, WHO LAMURDE REACHED: 220 REACHED: - GIREI GUYUK (2 Partners) SONG (2 Partners) NUMAN AGUF, JHF JHF DEMSA REACHED: - REACHED: 7,355 YOLA SOUTH YOLA NORTH HONG (3 Partners) TOUNGO (1 Partner) GDZI, JHF, WHO JHF MAYO FUFORE REACHED: 423 REACHED: - BELWA JADA (1 Partner) YOLA NORTH (4 Partners) HARAF, IOM, JHF, UNICEF JHF JADA REACHED: - REACHED: 1,224 LAMURDE (1 Partner) YOLA SOUTH (4 Partners) GANYE JHF IOM, JHF, SWOGE, UNICEF Number of Organizations REACHED: - REACHED: 7,355 (3 Partners) MADAGALI 1 7 JHF, PLAN, WHO TOUNGO REACHED: 4,537 MAIHA (2 Partners) JHF, WHO
    [Show full text]
  • Biometric Registration 4 December 2018
    State: LGA: Ward: DTM Dakri, Damare, Nigeria Adamawa Girei Girei Girei 1, Modire/Vinikilang Biometric Registration 4 December 2018 Yobe Total Registered Borno individuals households Gombe 16,479 6,327 Adamawa PPP Girei 1 76% 16% Cameroon Dakri SANGERE DUTSE _IDPs Women and Children Children under 5 years Taraba P SABON GARI P 43% 57% Male Female ± Girei 2 Girei 3% 11% Elderly People with ANGWAN KARA vulnerabilities P FEDERAL HOUSING P LGA of origin of registered individuals LGA % Household size distribution MADAGALI 40% % Damare % GWOZA 24% 20 20 BADIRISA/LAINDE MICHIKA 12% % P HONG 4% 5 BAJABURE 1 ASKIRA / UBA 3% % % P Modire 3 MUBI NORTH 2% 2 1 1 DAMBOA 2% NUMAN 2% % 9 BAMA 2% Others 10% % JABBORE 5 P % P 3 Registration site 1% Percentage of households Percentage 1% 1% Yola North 0 0.75 1.5 3 Km Ward boundary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 Household size Recently concluded Biometric Registra�on in Girei Local Government Area (LGA), within the period of 13 November – 28 November 2018, has brought the total number of Returnees and Displaced persons in Girei (LGA) to 16,476 individuals (6,327 households). The average family size within the loca�on is 3, with 33 per cent of families comprising of 1 - 2 members; 35 per cent comprising of 3 - 4 members; 21 per cent comprising of 5-6 members; 8 per cent comprising of 7-8 members; and 3 per cent comprising of 9 and above members. During the registra�on exercise, the enumerators collected vulnerability data to iden�fy individuals who may require addi�onal humanitarian assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • (Fugs) Through Agro-Processing and Market Accessibility in Adamawa State, Nigeria
    Vol. 5(4), pp. 129-134, April, 2013 Journal of Development and Agricultural DOI 10.5897/JDAE12.090 ISSN 2006-9774 © 2013 Academic Journals Economics http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE Full Length Research Paper Role of Fadama III in improving the income of Fadama User Groups (FUGs) through agro-processing and market accessibility in Adamawa State, Nigeria M. R. Ja’afar-Furo 1*, M. K. Bello 2, S. I. Mshelia 2 and D. M. Hammanyaji 2 1Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Adamawa State University, PMB 25, Mubi, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. 2Adamawa State Fadama Co-ordination Office (ADSFCO), C/o Adamawa Agricultural Development Programme, P. O. Box 780, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Accepted 4 December, 2012 This study was conducted to evaluate the income status of Fadama III beneficiaries in Adamawa State, Nigeria, with the ultimate aim of determining the effects of the project on Fadama User Groups (FUGs) in the month of June, 2011. A total of six (6) Local Government Areas (Fufore, Girei, Demsa, Mayobelwa, Maiha and Madagali) believed to have established FUGs with functional agro-processing enterprises were purposely selected from the three (3) senatorial districts, SE, (two from each SE) of the State. Data were collected from the FUGs by the use of questionnaire, in addition to oral interviews and group discussions. Results indicated that a larger proportion of the projects participating in adding value to agricultural commodities were concentrated in Madagali LGA, with male membership accounting for the majority in the FUGs. Gender wise, age group of 18 to 39 years recorded the highest in both sexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Landcover Indicies of Adamawa State Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (Gis) Techniques
    FUTY Journal of the Environment, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2009 1 © School of Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Yola-Nigeria. ISSN 1597-8826 ((©© School of Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Yola-Nigeria. ISSN 1597-8826 MEASURING LANDCOVER INDICIES OF ADAMAWA STATE USING REMOTE SENSING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TECHNIQUES A. A. Musa1 and A. L. Tukur2 1Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal University of Technology, Yola 2Department of Geography, Federal University of Technology, Yola ABSTRACT Areas covered by marshlands, highlands and plains were needed in each local government area (LGA) as the bases for allocating funds to the LGAs. In recognition of the fact that ground survey techniques are very labor intensive, consumes a lot of time and generally inconveniencing, a GIS technique was adopted. Satellite images of the state were sub divided along the LGA boundaries. Highlands were located visually and digitized into vector polygons, and then by using the polygon tool of the GIS, areas covered by the polygons were determined. The image classification routine was used to isolate marshlands. By going to the ‘Raster Tools…’ menu and specifying the ‘Display/Edit Raster Attributes’ tool, the areas covered by the marshlands were also determined. Areas covered by plains on the other hand were determined indirectly. The area covered by highlands (already computed) was subtracted from the total area of the LGA by using manual qualitative deduction. Since highlands and plains are mutually exclusive, the result of the subtraction is the area covered by plains. It was observed that LGAs with the highest percentage of marshlands are those which R.Benue pass through.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Nigeria DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT)
    DTM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL (ETT) The DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and to collect informa�on on large and sudden popula�on movements, provide frequent updates on the scale of displacement and quan�fy the affected popula�on when needed. As a s ubcomponent of the Mobility Tracking methodology in Nigeria, ETT u�lises direct observa�on and a broad network of key informants to capture best es�mates of the affected popula�on per loca�on, enabling targeted humanitarian response planning. Chad ETT Report: No. 228 | 14 - 20 June 2021 Lake Chad MOVEMENTS NEW ARRIVAL SCREENING BY NUTRITION PARTNERS Niger Arrivals: 1,352 individuals 77 Abadam Mobbar Kukawa Departures: 22 Mobbar 64 11 2 Guzamala Dikwa 596 individuals Askira/Uba Between 14 and 20 June 2021, a total of 1,948 movements were recorded in the states of 160 Monguno Gubio Adamawa and Borno. The recorded movements consisted of 1,352 arrivals and 596 Nganzai 125 departures. Arrivals were recorded at locations in Askira/Uba, Bama, Gwoza, Hawul and Marte Ngala Kala/Balge Monguno Local Government Areas (LGAs) of the most conflict-affected state of Borno and Magumeri Mafa 76 in Demsa, Fufore, Girei, Gombi, Hong, Lamurde, Maiha, Michika, Mubi North, Mubi Jere Dikwa South, Numan, Song, Yola North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa. Maiduguri Cameroon Borno Bama Kaga Konduga Departures were recorded in Askira/Uba, Hawul and Kala/Balge LGA of Borno, and 20 150 Gombi Demsa, Fufore, Gombi, Lamurde, Madagali, Maiha, Mubi North, Mubi South, Numan, Yola Gwoza 132106 Gwoza North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Adamawa) Emirate, 1809-1976
    Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science Volume 9 ~ Issue 5 (2021) pp: 75-88 ISSN(Online):2321-9467 www.questjournals.org Research Paper The Transformation of Local Administration in Fombina (Adamawa) Emirate, 1809-1976 Hamza Tukur Ribadu, PhD, Garba Ibrahim, PhD. and Amina Ramat Said, PhD. Department of History, University of Maiduguri, P.M.B. 1069, Maiduguri, Borno State. ABSTRACT The Adamawa Emirate was established in the 19th as part of the larger Sokoto Caliphate. This paper examines the local administration that came into being in the area from 1809 to 1976. With the success of the 19th century Jihad, the Emirate type of administration was imposed in the area. However, unlike in Hausa land where the Jihadists used the preexisting political structure, in Fombina (Adamawa) the Fulbe found predominantly non- centralized and autonomous chiefdoms. The administration established in the area can therefore be regarded as a pyramidal political system. By 1903 the British conquered the Northern Region and subsequently institutionalized the Indirect Rule system which was to be run through local chiefs. In Adamawa, the Emir/Lamido became the Native Authority supported by a bureaucratic organization known as the Native Administration which was resident in Yola. Below this, with the creation of ‘homologous’ districts, there was the district administration headed by the District Head assisted by other officials. This type of administration continued to exist with some modifications up to 1976. However, by 1976 there was the Local Government Reform which introduced elected executives at the local level and removing the traditional chiefs from having any major role in administration at the local level.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Nigeria DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) Report No.144 (4
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria DTM Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL (ETT) DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up-to-date information on sudden displacement and other population movements ETT Report: No. 144 | 4 - 10 November 2019 MOVEMENTS NEW ARRIVAL SCREENING BY NUTRITION PARTNERS Arrivals: Green: 109 Children (6-59 months) Niger Lake Chad 1,264 individuals 97 screened for malnutrition Abadam MUAC category of screened children Mobbar Departures: Kukawa Ngala 362 individuals Green: 90 Yellow: 4 Red: 3 32 Guzamala Gubio Nganzai During the period of 4 – 10 November 2019, a total of 1,626 movements were Monguno 233 recorded, which were composed of 1,264 arrivals and 362 departures. Arrivals were Marte recorded at locations in Maiduguri Metropolitan Council, Askira/Uba, Bama, Biu, Magumeri Mafa Kala/Balge Chibok, Damboa, Gwoza, Hawul, Konduga, Mafa, Mobbar and Ngala Local Jere Dikwa Maiduguri 47 Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno State. Arrivals were also recorded in Demsa, 70 Kaga 5 Bama Fufore, Gombi, Hong, Madagali, Maiha, Michika, Mubi North, Mubi South, Numan, Konduga Borno Song, Yola North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa State. Departures were recorded 4 in Askira/Uba, Gwoza and Kala/Balge LGAs of Borno State. Departures were also 128 Gwoza 116 Damboa 30 recorded in Fufore, Gombi, Hong, Madagali, Maiha, Mubi North, Mubi South, 14 12 17 Numan, Song and Yola North LGAs of Adamawa State. 13 Chibok 33 Biu 14 9 Madagali ETT assessments identified the following movement triggers: poor living conditions Askira/Uba Michika (38%), voluntary relocation (33%), improved security (13%), flood (8%), military Hawul Kwaya Kusar Hong 77 27 Gombi operations (4%), fear of attack (3%) and conflict/attack (1%).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Nigeria
    FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA Public Disclosure Authorized ADAMAWA STATE GOVERNMENT RURAL ACCESS & MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP II) DETAILED ENGINEERING, SAFEGUARDS STUDIES AND PREPARATION OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS FOR PRIORITIZED ROADS IN ADAMAWA STATE (RAMP II) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY YAROSON PARTNERSHIP LIMITED, NIGERIA CLIENT CONSULTANTS National Coordinator YAROSON PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Federal Project Management Unit Halford Pavey House Rural Access & Mobility Project (RAMP) IB Aliyu Turaki Road, Federal Ministry of Agriculture & Rural P. O. Box 843, Kaduna, Nigeria. Public Disclosure Authorized Email: [email protected] Development NAIC House, Plot 590, Zone AO AND Along Airport Road, Central Area Plot 576 Mobolaji Crescent Abuja - Nigeria. Gudu - Abuja, Nigeria. JUNE, 2012 Yaroson Partnership Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Content Page Table of contents i List of Tables iv List of Figures and Plates v List of Appendices vi List of Acronyms vi Executive Summary vii 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Project Background 1 1.3 Project objective 1 1.4 Existing Condition of the Roads 1 1.5 The Scope of Work (ToR) 4 1.6 The Study Approach and Methodology 4 1.7 Interactive Discussions and Consultations 9 2.0 POLICY, LEGAL ADMINSTRATIVE & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 12 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Relevant Regulatory Instruments 12 2.2.1 World Bank Operational Policies 12 2.2.2 Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) Acts 13 2.3 Safeguard Policies that Apply to the RAMPII Adamawa Project
    [Show full text]