DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the Antares 200 Configuration Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the Antares 200 Configuration Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANTARES 200 CONFIGURATION EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE AT WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY www.nasa.gov September 2015 Front cover image: The Antares Orb-2 launched the third Cygnus from Wallops Island, Virginia to the International Space Station on July 13, 2014. Photo Credit: Brea Reeves, NASA WFF Optical Systems Group Back cover image: The Antares Orb-D1 mission launched on September 18, 2013, from Wallops Island, Virginia, with the first Cygnus on board to rendezvous with the International Space Station. Photo Credit: Jamie Adkins, NASA WFF Optical Systems Group FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANTARES 200 CONFIGURATION EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE AT WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA 23337 Lead Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cooperating Agency: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Proposed Action: Processing, Static Fire, and Launch of the 200 Configuration Antares Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight Facility For Further Information: Joshua A. Bundick Lead, Environmental Planning National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Wallops Flight Facility Wallops Island, VA 23337 (757) 824-2319 [email protected] Date: September 2015 ABSTRACT This Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) addresses the proposed processing, static fire, and launch of the 200 Configuration Antares Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center’s Wallops Flight Facility (WFF), located in Accomack County, Virginia. The SEA has been prepared as a supplement to the 2009 Final Environmental Assessment Expansion of the Wallops Flight Facility Launch Range, and therefore focuses on the differences between the current Antares configuration (i.e., the “100” Configuration) at WFF and a proposed upgraded version (i.e., the “200” Configuration). Updated information regarding WFF’s environmental context is also provided, as appropriate. This SEA analyzes the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of two alternatives: the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Antares 200 Configuration Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight Facility Table of Contents Table of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Table of Tables ......................................................................................................................... iii 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .................................. 1-1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Relationship to 2009 Final EA ............................................................................. 1-2 1.1.2 Cooperating Agency ............................................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ......................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Need ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Cooperating Agency Purpose and Need .............................................................. 1-4 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 No Action Alternative .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Antares 200 Configuration ELV .......................................................................... 2-3 2.3.2 Antares 200 Configuration Spacecraft ................................................................. 2-5 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ......... 3-1 3.1 Physical Environment .......................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.1 Soils...................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.1.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.1.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................... 3-4 3.1.2 Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.2.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.2.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................... 3-5 3.1.3 Coastal Zone Management .................................................................................. 3-7 3.1.3.1 Regulatory Context ......................................................................................... 3-7 3.1.3.2 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-7 3.1.3.3 Environmental Consequences......................................................................... 3-8 Table of Contents i Final: September 2015 Antares 200 Configuration Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight Facility 3.1.4 Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 3-8 3.1.4.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-8 3.1.4.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................... 3-9 3.1.5 Noise .................................................................................................................. 3-11 3.1.5.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-11 3.1.5.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-12 3.2 Biological Environment ..................................................................................... 3-17 3.2.1 Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 3-17 3.2.1.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-17 3.2.1.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-17 3.2.2 Wildlife and Migratory Birds............................................................................. 3-18 3.2.2.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-18 3.2.2.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-19 3.2.3 Marine Mammals ............................................................................................... 3-22 3.2.3.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-22 3.2.3.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-23 3.2.4 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................. 3-24 3.2.4.1 Regulatory Context ....................................................................................... 3-24 3.2.4.2 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-24 3.2.4.3 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-27 3.3 Social Environment ............................................................................................ 3-33 3.3.1 Land and Water Uses ......................................................................................... 3-33 3.3.1.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-33 3.3.1.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-33 3.3.2 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 3-34 3.3.2.1 Regulatory Context ....................................................................................... 3-34 3.3.2.2 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-34 3.3.2.3 Environmental Consequences....................................................................... 3-35 3.3.3 DOT Act Section 4(f) Resources ....................................................................... 3-35 3.3.3.1 Regulatory Context ....................................................................................... 3-35 3.3.3.2 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 3-36 ii Table of Contents Final: September 2015 Antares 200 Configuration Expendable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robenschain GSFC July 2012
    Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Goddard Space Flight Center • NASA’s first Space Flight Center (established 1959) • We TRANSFORM Human Understanding of Earth and Space • Largest Collection of Scientists & Engineers in the U.S. • Nearly 300 successful missions including the World’s First Weather Satellite and the Hubble Space Telescope • 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics [Big Bang/Cosmic Background] • Hubble Supported 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics • WMAP Team Awarded 2012 Gruber Prize for Cosmology 2 Our Facilities • GSFC Greenbelt, Maryland • GSFC Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia • IV&V Facility, West Virginia • Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York Wallops Flight Facility • Ground Stations at White Sands Complex, New Mexico White Sands Complex Greenbelt Goddard Institute for Independent Verification and Space Studies Validation Facility 3 Our Lines of Business Cross Cutting Earth Science Technology and Capabilities Suborbital Platforms Astrophysics Planetary & Lunar Human Exploration Science & Operations Communications && Navigation GSFC’s Contributions to a Diverse Mission Portfolio QuikSCAT dinW dinW Voyager O-E1 O-E1 teoSer teoSer SBRE SBRE ACRIMSAT RHESSI TSOM TSOM TMMR TMMR Geotail OOHS OOHS aquA aquA ICESat DETMI DETMI SAMPEX Landsat 7 TRACE THEMIS TOPEX CALIPSO Tarer Tarer ECA ECA GRACE SORCE Cluster SOEP SOEP ODS ODS GEAMI GEAMI MIA MIA aruA aruA TSFA TSFA SGOE SGOE oPlar oPlar MGP MGP SMM SMM Solar-B XEBI XEBI PPN PPN Aquarius CloudSat TDRSS LMCD LMCD Osiris-Rex (Sample Return) PSBR PSBR PAMW PAMW TWINS Cassini (Instrument)
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Lifetime Predictions
    Orbital LIFETIME PREDICTIONS An ASSESSMENT OF model-based BALLISTIC COEFfiCIENT ESTIMATIONS AND ADJUSTMENT FOR TEMPORAL DRAG co- EFfiCIENT VARIATIONS M.R. HaneVEER MSc Thesis Aerospace Engineering Orbital lifetime predictions An assessment of model-based ballistic coecient estimations and adjustment for temporal drag coecient variations by M.R. Haneveer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday June 1, 2017 at 14:00 PM. Student number: 4077334 Project duration: September 1, 2016 – June 1, 2017 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. N. Doornbos, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. E. J. O. Schrama, TU Delft ir. K. J. Cowan MBA TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Summary Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experience low levels of drag due to the interaction with the outer layers of Earth’s atmosphere. The atmospheric drag reduces the velocity of the object, resulting in a gradual decrease in altitude. With each decayed kilometer the object enters denser portions of the atmosphere accelerating the orbit decay until eventually the object cannot sustain a stable orbit anymore and either crashes onto Earth’s surface or burns up in its atmosphere. The capability of predicting the time an object stays in orbit, whether that object is space junk or a satellite, allows for an estimate of its orbital lifetime - an estimate satellite op- erators work with to schedule science missions and commercial services, as well as use to prove compliance with international agreements stating no passively controlled object is to orbit in LEO longer than 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration
    SpaceX CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration to the International Space Station September 2014 OVERVIEW The Dragon spacecraft will be filled with more than 5,000 pounds of supplies and payloads, including critical materials to support 255 science and research investigations that will occur during Expeditions 41 and 42. Dragon will carry three powered cargo payloads in its pressurized section and two in its unpressurized trunk. Science payloads will enable model organism research using rodents, fruit flies and plants. A special science payload is the ISS-Rapid Scatterometer to monitor ocean surface wind speed and direction. Several new technology demonstrations aboard will enable bone density studies, test how a small satellite moves and positions itself in space using new thruster technology, and use the first 3-D printer in space for additive manufacturing. The mission also delivers IMAX cameras for filming during four increments and replacement batteries for the spacesuits. After four weeks at the space station, the spacecraft will return with about 3,800 pounds of cargo, including crew supplies, hardware and computer resources, science experiments, space station hardware, and four powered payloads. DRAGON CARGO LAUNCH ITEMS RETURN ITEMS TOTAL CARGO: 4885 lbs / 2216 kg 3276 lbs / 1486 kg · Crew Supplies 1380 lbs / 626 kg 132 lbs / 60 kg Crew care packages Crew provisions Food · Vehicle Hardware 403 lbs / 183 kg 937 lbs / 425 kg Crew Health Care System hardware Environment Control & Life Support equipment Electrical Power System hardware Extravehicular Robotics equipment Flight Crew Equipment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency equipment · Science Investigations 1644 lbs / 746 kg 2075 lbs / 941 kg U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business with Wallops Flight Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Doing Business with NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in Virginia provides agile, low-cost flight and launch range ser- vices to meet government and commercial sector needs for accessing flight regimes worldwide from the Earth’s surface to the moon and beyond. As a multi-user facility with operational launch range, spaceport, and airfield assets, Wallops is well-positioned to meet ongoing and emerging needs in the science, aerospace, defense, and commercial industries. WALLOPS RANGE The Wallops Range supports many of the mission activities around WFF and abroad. Project managers utlize the support of range services to provide a broad array of technical and instrumentation services, such as radar, optical tracking, telemetry, meteorological, command and control, surveillance and recovery, financial analysis and engineering services to support scientific research and technology development. WALLOPS MOBILE ASSETS Wallops has semi-permanent downrange instrumentation as well as mobile instrumentation to include radar, telemetry, command/control, and data systems that can be transported to offsite and remote locations. Campaigns have been conducted from the semi-permanent locations in Bermuda and North Carolina, as well as from the Arctic and Antarctic regions, South America, Africa, Europe, Australia and even at sea, with our mobile systems. WFF personnel have extensive experience in planning and conducting downrange support and mobile campaigns, developing equipment and systems to support these operations. Downrange and mobile systems include the following: C-band radar, meteorology, optical tracking, orbital tracking, flight termination, telemetry, timing, surveillance, and recovery. Keith Thompson, Wallops Advanced Projects Office | 757-824-1680 www.nasa.gov/wallops MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL SPACEPORT Virginia’s Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at Wallops supports two launch facilities, one medium-lift liquid-fueled pad and a medium-lift solid propellant pad.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Policy on Waiving Ground Safety Regulations At
    Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 415, 417, 431, and 435 Statement of Policy on Waiving Ground Safety Regulations at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Wallops Flight Facility, and Kennedy Space Center. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT ACTION: Policy Statement SUMMARY: This action establishes the FAA’s policy applicable to waivers of FAA ground safety requirements for licensed commercial launch and reentry activities at certain Federal ranges. The Federal ranges that currently meet the criteria for application of this policy are: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Wallops Flight Facility, and Kennedy Space Center. DATES: The policy described herein will be effective 3 November 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information concerning this action, contact Executive Director, Office of Operational Safety, via letter: 800 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20591; via email: [email protected]; via phone: 202-267-7793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended and codified at 51 U.S.C. §§ 50901-50923, authorizes the Department of Transportation, and the FAA through delegation, to oversee, license, and regulate commercial launch and reentry activities, and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. Section 50905(b)(3) allows the Secretary to waive a requirement, including the requirement to obtain a license, for an individual applicant if the Secretary decides that the waiver is in the public interest and will not jeopardize the public health and safety, safety of property, and national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.1 This policy statement provides public notice of the FAA’s approach to evaluating waiver applications under 51 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
    ANS NETS 2018 – Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Las Vegas, NV, February 26 – March 1, 2018, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL (2018) NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723 240-228-5724; [email protected] Launching a NASA radioisotope power system (RPS) trajectory to Saturn used a Venus-Venus-Earth-Jupiter mission requires compliance with two Federal mandates: Gravity Assist (VVEJGA) maneuver, where the Earth the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Gravity Assist (EGA) flyby was the primary nuclear safety and launch approval (LA), as directed by Presidential focus of NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Directive/National Security Council Memorandum 25. Cassini Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Panel Nuclear safety launch approval lessons learned from (INSRP), and the public alike. A solid propellant fire test multiple NASA RPS missions, one Russian RPS mission, campaign addressed the MPF finding and led in part to two non-RPS launch accidents, and several solid the retrofit solid propellant breakup systems (BUSs) propellant fire test campaigns since 1996 are shown to designed and carried by MER-A and MER-B spacecraft have contributed to an ever-growing body of knowledge. and the deployment of plutonium detectors in the launch The launch accidents can be viewed as “unplanned area for PNH. The PNH mission decreased the calendar experiments” that provided real-world data. Lessons length of the NEPA/LA processes to less than 4 years by learned from the nuclear safety launch approval effort of incorporating lessons learned from previous missions and each mission or launch accident, and how they were tests in its spacecraft and mission designs and their applied to improve the NEPA/LA processes and nuclear NEPA/LA processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel-1A Launch
    SENTINEL-1A LAUNCH Arianespace’s seventh Soyuz launch from the Guiana Space Center will orbit Sentinel-1A, the first satellite in Europe’s Earth observation program, Copernicus. The European Space Agency (ESA) chose Thales Alenia Space to design, develop and build the satellite, as well as perform related tests. Copernicus is the new name for the European program previously known as GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), and is the European Commission’s second major space program, following Galileo. Copernicus is designed to give Europe continuous, independent and reliable access to Earth observation data. With the Soyuz, Ariane 5 and Vega launchers at the Guiana Space Center (CSG), Arianespace is the only launch services provider in the world capable of launching all types of payloads into all orbits, from the smallest to the largest geostationary satellites, from satellite clusters for constellations to cargo missions for the International Space Station (ISS). Arianespace sets the launch services standard for all operators, whether commercial or governmental, and guarantees access to space for scientific missions. Sentinel-1A is the 50th satellite with an Earth observation payload to be launched by Arianespace. Arianespace has seven more Earth observation missions in its order book, including four commercial missions (signed in 2013 and 2014). The Copernicus program is designed to give Europe complete independence in the acquisition and management of environmental data concerning our planet. ESA’s Sentinel programs comprise five satellite families: Sentinel-1, to provide continuity for radar data from ERS and Envisat. Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3, dedicated to the observation of the Earth and its oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • SGAC-Annual-Report-2014.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT SPACE GENERATION ADVISORY COUNCIL 2014 In support of the United Nations Programme on Space Applications A. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Table of Contents 2 In support of the United Nations Programme B. Sponsors and Partners 4 on Space Applications 1. Introduction 10 1.1 About the SGAC 12 14 c/o European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) 1.2 Letter from the Co-chairs 15 Schwarzenbergplatz 6 1.3 Letter from the Executive Director 16 Vienna A-1030 1.4 SGAC output at a glance AUSTRIA 2. SGAC Background 22 2.1 History of the SGAC 24 26 [email protected] 2.2 Leadership and Structure 27 www.spacegeneration.org 2.3 Programme +41 1 718 11 18 30 3. The organisation in 2014 30 32 +43 1 718 11 18 99 3.1 Goal Achievement Review 3.2 SGAC Activity Highlights 36 42 © 2015 Space Generation Advisory Council 3.3 Space Generation Fusion Forum Report 3.4 Space Generation Congress Report 50 3.5 United Nations Report 62 3.6 SGAC Regional Workshops 66 3.7 SGAC Supported Events 68 3.8 Financial Summary 72 Acknowledgements 4. Projects 78 4.1 Project Outcomes and Highlights 80 The SGAC 2014 Annual Report was compiled and 4.2 Space Technologies for Disaster Management Project Group 81 edited by Minoo Rathansabapathy (South Africa/ 4.3 Near Earth Objects Project Group 82 Australia), Andrea Jaime (Spain), Laura Rose (USA) 4.4 Space Law and Policy Project Group 84 and Arno Geens (Belgium) with the assistance of 4.5 Commercial Space Project Group 86 Candice Goodwin (South Africa), Justin Park (USA), 4.6 Space Safety and Sustainability Project Group 88 Nikita Marwaha (United Kingdom), Dario Schor 4.7 Small Satellites Project Group 90 (Argentina/Canada), Leo Teeney (UK) and Abhijeet 4.8 Space Exploration Project Group 92 Kumar (Australia) in editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Plan
    M A R C H 2 0 2 1 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE MARCH 2021 SECTION MEETING: MAKING A DIFFERENCE A T M A C H 2 . Presenter. Lt. Col. Tucker Hamilton Organization USAF F-35 Developmental Test Director of Operations INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Abstract I humbly present my flying experiences through SECTION CALENDAR 2 pictures and videos of what it takes and what it is like to be an Experimental Fighter Test Pilot. My personal stories include NATIONAL AIAA EVENTS 2 major life-threatening aircraft accidents, close saves, combat SPACE NUCLEAR PROPULSION REPORT 3 flying revelations, serendipitous opportunities testing first of its kind technology, flying over 30 aircraft from a zeppelin to a ALBUQUERQUE DECEMBER MEETING 5 MiG-15 to an A-10, and managing the Joint Strike Fighter De- velopmental Test program for all three services. Through ALBUQUERQUE JANUARY MEETING 6 these experiences you will learn not just what a Test Pilot does, but also gain encour- ALBUQUERQUE FEBRUARY MEETING 7 agement through my lessons learned on how to make a difference in your local com- munities…did I mention cool flight test videos! CALL FOR SCIENCE FAIR JUDGES 9 Lt Col Tucker "Cinco" Hamilton started his Air Force career as an CALL FOR SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS 10 operational F-15C pilot. He supported multiple Red Flag Exercises and real world Operation Noble Eagle missions where he protect- NEW AIAA HIGH SCHOOL MEMBERSHIPS 10 ed the President of the United States; at times escorting Air Force One.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Not Circulate
    LA-7328-PR Progress Report a . Laser Fusion Program July 1—December 31, 1977 ,- .. .. .. ..-— — DO NOT CIRCULATE PERMANENT RETENTION ! REQUIREDBY CONTRACT v LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Lail!lik — post Office Box 1663 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 An AffumativeAction/EqualOpportunityEmployex . The four most recent reports in this series,un- classified, are LA-65 10-PR, LAY6 16-PR, LA4834-PR, and LA-6982-PR. This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Laser Fusion. TM. report was prep.rcd as m .CLWUII1O( work sponsored by the United SUICS Go”enlme”l. Neither the Un,ted Stiles I nor the United Slates Department cd Enersy. nor any of their employees. nor any 0( their CO.114C10rS. subcontrar tom. or their ●w.loyecs. makes any warranty. .xD,,!s O, irnPlled. ., P .isume. any Iesal Ii. biiity or responsibkbw for the accuracy. cmnpletcncm. y usefulness of any information. app.; .t.s. product. or Pro..= dl=losed. or rrpreacnm that its w would “.1 i“fri”le privately owned rlthls. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF CNCRGV CONTRACT W-7408 -CNO. S6 LA-7328-PR Progress Report UC-21 IssI,W: December 1978 . Laser Fusion Program at LASL July 1—December 31, 1977 Compiled by Frederick Skoberne 4 .! L-. — .— - . ABSTRACT . ...”” 1 SUMMARY . ...0000oo 2 Introduction . 2 CO, Laser Program . 2 Antares . 2 CO, Laser Technology . 3 Laser Fusion Theory, Experiments, and Target Design . 3 Laser Fusion Target Fabrication . 4 1, CO, LASER PROGRAM . 6 Single-Beam System . 6 llvo-Beam System . 6 Eight-Beam System . 8 II. ANTARES-HIGH-ENERGY GAS IJM3ERFAClLITY .
    [Show full text]