DOCSLIB.ORG

(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Children and Education Scrutiny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Children and Education Scrutiny Public Document Pack AB CHILDREN AND EDUCATION SCRUTINY COMMITTEE THURSDAY 1 MARCH 2018 7.00 PM Bourges/Viersen Room - Town Hall AGENDA Page No 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest and Whipping Declarations At this point Members must declare whether they have a disclosable pecuniary interest, or other interest, in any of the items on the agenda, unless it is already entered in the register of members’ interests or is a “pending notification “ that has been disclosed to the Solicitor to the Council. Members must also declare if they are subject to their party group whip in relation to any items under consideration. 3. Minutes of the Children and Education Scrutiny Committee Meeting 3 - 10 Held on 29 January 2018 4. Call In of any Cabinet, Cabinet Member or Key Officer Decisions The decision notice for each decision will bear the date on which it is published and will specify that the decision may then be implemented on the expiry of 3 working days after the publication of the decision (not including the date of publication), unless a request for call-in of the decision is received from any two Members of the relevant Scrutiny Committee. If a request for call-in of a decision is received, implementation of the decision remains suspended for consideration by the relevant Scrutiny Committee 5. Safeguarding Children And Young People At Risk As A Result Of 11 - 20 Being Missing From Home, Education Or Care 6. School Organisation Plan 2018 21 - 110 7. Examination (GCSE) Outcomes For Children Aged 16 Years In 2017 111 - 116 There is an induction hearing loop system available in all meeting rooms. Some of the systems are infra-red operated, if you wish to use this system then please contact Paulina Ford on 01733 452508 as soon as possible. Did you know? All Peterborough City Council's meeting agendas are available online or via the modern.gov app. Help us achieve our environmental protection aspirations and view this agenda online instead of printing it. 8. Community Education Including Apprenticeship Provision 117 - 126 9. Forward Plan of Executive Decisions 127 - 168 Emergency Evacuation Procedure – Outside Normal Office Hours In the event of the fire alarm sounding all persons should vacate the building by way of the nearest escape route and proceed directly to the assembly point in front of the Cathedral. The duty Beadle will assume overall control during any evacuation, however in the unlikely event the Beadle is unavailable, this responsibility will be assumed by the Committee Chair. Recording of Council Meetings: Any member of the public may film, audio-record, take photographs and use social media to report the proceedings of any meeting that is open to the public. A protocol on this facility is available at: http://democracy.peterborough.gov.uk/ecSDDisplay.aspx?NAME=Protocol%20on%20the%20use%20of%20Recor ding&ID=690&RPID=2625610&sch=doc&cat=13385&path=13385 Committee Members: Councillors: J Goodwin (Chairman), S Barkham, R Bisby, G Casey, A Dowson, A Iqbal, J Johnson, M Mahabadi, D Over (Vice Chairman), B Rush and B Saltmarsh Substitutes: Councillors: A Ellis, C Harper and N Sandford Co-opted Members Note: The following Education Co-opted members are Members of the Scrutiny Committee and vote when education matters are discussed. Liz Youngman, Peterborough Diocesan Board of Education Flavio Vettese, (Deputy Director of Schools), Roman Catholic Church, Diocese of East Anglia Vacancy, Parent Governor Representative Vacancy, Parent Governor Representative Julie O’Connor, Roman Catholic Diocese of East Anglia (sub for Flavio Vettese) Peter Cantley, Peterborough Diocesan Board of Education (sub for Liz Youngman) Non Statutory Co-optees Alistair Kingsley, Independent Co-opted Member (Non-voting) Rizwan Rahemtulla, Independent Co-opted Member (Non-voting) Parish Councillor Susie Lucas, Independent Co-opted Member (Non-voting) Parish Councillor Margaret Palmer, Substitute Independent Co-opted Member (Non-voting) Further information about this meeting can be obtained from Paulina Ford on telephone 01733 452508 or by email – [email protected] MINUTES OF THE CHILDREN AND EDUCATION SCRUTINY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD AT 7PM ON 29 JANUARY 2018 BOURGES/VIERSEN ROOM, TOWN HALL, PETERBOROUGH Committee Councillors J Goodwin (Chairman), S Barkham, R Bisby, G Casey, Members Present: A Ellis, A Iqbal, D Over (Vice Chairman), J Johnson, B Rush, E Murphy, B Saltmarsh Peter Cantley, Education Co-opted Member Susie Lucas, Parish Councillor Co-opted Member Al Kingsley, Co-opted Member Rizwan Rahemtulla – Co-opted Member Officers Present: Gary Perkins Assistant Director, Education Lou Williams Service Director for Children’s Services and Safeguarding Paulina Ford Senior Democratic Services Officer 37. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Dowson and Councillor Mahabadi. Councillor Ellis attended as a substitute for Councillor Dowson and Councillor Murphy attended as a substitute for Councillor Mahabadi. Education Co-opted Members Flavio Vettese and Liz Youngman also submitted their apologies. Peter Cantley was in attendance as substitute for Liz Youngman. 38. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST AND WHIPPING DECLARATIONS There were no declarations of Interest or whipping declarations. 39. MINUTES OF THE CHILDREN AND EDUCATION SCRUTINY COMMITTEE HELD ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2017 The minutes of the meeting held on 7 September 2017 were agreed as a true and accurate record. 40. CALL IN OF ANY CABINET, CABINET MEMBER OR KEY OFFICER DECISIONS There were no requests for call-in to consider. 41. OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN AGED 5, 7 AND 11 YEARS IN 2017 The Assistant Director, Education introduced the report which provided the Committee with an update on standards of attainment and rates of progress made by children in Peterborough Infant, Junior and Primary schools in the 2017 Early Years and National Curriculum assessments 2017. 3 The Committee debated the report and in summary, key points raised and responses to questions included: Members of the committee commented that online results had shown that some rural schools were not performing as expected compared to some inner city schools. Members were informed that specific data concerning outcomes of rural schools could be provided. All schools across Peterborough were offered the same support whether they were rural or inner city schools, or governed by a Trust Board or Governing Body. The Local Authority had a team of Improvement Advisors who provided advice and guidance to all schools if needed. A Vulnerable Group working party had been established which looked at data trends. The group that performed the best compared with the national average were the group of students with Special Educational Needs. Children with English as an additional language were also closing the gap quickly compared to the national average and were performing well. There were still challenges around the outcomes for white British children with pupil premium and resources were being targeted at this group to provide support in this area for improvement. There were many challenges in Peterborough and there had been improvement at KS2 in maths in 2016/2017. There were many schools who had performed well and should be congratulated. In 2016 the outcomes for reading had been particularly disappointing. Schools on their own could not bring about the necessary improvement. A Vision for Reading had been launched across the city and it was hoped that through the Reading Pledge the enjoyment of learning through reading would improve. Copies of the Reading Pledge and Vision for Reading were handed out to Members of the Committee to take away. Schools that did not take up support from the Local Authority were probably receiving support from their own Trust. Regular discussions took place with Head Teachers to look at the support offered to schools from the Local Authority to ensure the right support continued to be provided. All schools taking part in targeted support programmes from the Local Authority were benefiting. Members sought clarification as to how scalable the targeted intervention Programme was. Members were informed that the intention was that the schools benefiting from the Targeted Intervention Programme would be chosen as lead schools to work with other schools entering the programme so that a system of school hubs would be set up and therefore not always reliant on Local Authority officers. Parents, carers, elected members, schools and the Local Authority needed to work together to improve outcomes. Outcomes in schools were dependent on the quality of teaching and if children were ready to learn. The School Readiness Programme and Vision for Reading would support children in readiness for school. The role of the Local Authority in school improvement was much more limited now and the Schools Standards and Effectiveness Team had issued 12 Letters of Concern and 2 Formal Warning Notices to schools. All schools had produced robust action plans and some schools had School Improvement Advisors working in the schools. Those schools which were still demonstrating some concerns would be visited by the Regional Schools Commissioner and discussions would be had as to whether the governance arrangements would need to be changed. Peterborough had a unique set of challenges compared to other local authority comparators. Members commented that some schools had a better SEN provision than others and therefore more children with SEN needs went to those schools which in turn lowered that schools outcomes. Members sought clarification as to whether the SEN outcomes could be separated out to show what the true outcomes of the school were. Members were informed that every school had the facility to separate the outcome data but it was important to note that a school should not only be judged on its attainment outcomes. The more powerful outcome for schools who specialise in working with SEN children would be the progress that was made from the starting point of learning to the end point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Merger Proposal
    March 2020 MERGER PROPOSAL For the proposed merger of Peterborough Regional College and New College Stamford Thriving Together 1 INTRODUCTION We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the public consultation, which was open from 6 January to 3 February 2020. Feedback was strongly in favour of the merger between New College Stamford and Peterborough Regional College, which is scheduled for 1 August 2020. Consultation is an integral part of the merger process. It is vital that local people have a say when significant changes of this nature are planned. We are satisfied that there was opportunity for everyone affected to have their say and to feedback comments, the results of which will be taken into consideration during our detailed planning and onward communications. This report reviews the responses received during the consultation period. It also addresses and clarifies issues raised. Thank you for your support and interest. Ian Jackson Allison Sunley Chair of Corporation Chair of Corporation Peterborough Regional College New College Stamford 2 OVERVIEW The level of positive interest in the merger means we can continue with our plans – looking to the future with confidence in terms of our ambition to: • Create a combined further education college group - the Inspire Education Group - serving Peterborough, Stamford and the surrounding areas • Retain the local college identities through the naming of the two campuses as Peterborough College and Stamford College • Continue to fully equip students with the skills they need to maximise
    [Show full text]
  • Have Your Say
    January 2020 CONSULTATION DOCUMENT For the proposed merger of Peterborough Regional College and New College Stamford Thriving Together Have your say 1 INTRODUCTION This public document outlines a proposal for merging Peterborough Regional College and New College Stamford, creating a combined further education and higher education college group to serve Peterborough, Stamford and the surrounding areas. Further details are provided on the following pages together with an opportunity for you to contribute thoughts and ideas – these can be sent to us using the online survey which can be found at either; www.peterborough.ac.uk/haveyoursay www.stamford.ac.uk/about-us/have-your-say or by printing and posting the form at the end of this document. Public consultation is a legal requirement prior to any college merger. Please do use this opportunity to feedback your comments and suggestions. Thank you for your time and interest. 2 CREATING A PARTNERSHIP OF EQUALS We are delighted to share our proposal that Peterborough Regional College and New College Stamford merge to become one college group. The decision of the two Corporations to submit this proposal reflects a positive and deliberate strategy to deliver a strengthened and sustainable offer to our local communities, in a climate where the stability of individual colleges is likely to be challenged in the future. It recognises the strengths and opportunities that can be created by coming together as a single, larger, more robust college group with one vision, a relevant and responsive curriculum and an absolute focus on quality, standards and excellence. This merger will allow us to further develop existing links and bring together two strong organisations to form a partnership of equals.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Regional College
    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Peterborough Regional College October 1995 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council has a legal duty to make sure further education in England is properly assessed. The FEFC’s inspectorate inspects and reports on each college of further education every four years. The inspectorate also assesses and reports nationally on the curriculum and gives advice to FEFC’s quality assessment committee. College inspections are carried out in accordance with the framework and guidelines described in Council Circular 93/28. They involve full-time inspectors and registered part-time inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the work they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member who does not work in education and a member of staff from the college being inspected. GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are set out in the Council Circular 93/28. During their inspection, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Their assessments are set out in the reports. They also use a five-point grading scale to summarise the balance between strengths and weaknesses. The descriptors for the grades are: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • grade 4 – provision in which the weaknesses clearly outweigh the strengths • grade 5 – provision which has many weaknesses and very few strengths. Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT Telephone 01203 863000 Fax 01203 863100 © FEFC 1995 You may photocopy this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevent Strategy
    EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY 8 TH SEPTEMBER 2009 www.taxpayersalliance.com Council Spending Uncovered II No.5: THE PREVENT STRATEGY The Prevent Strategy is part of the Government’s response to the threat of terrorism from Islamist extremists. Aimed at stopping people from becoming terrorists, the Government has given Local Authorities money to fund projects administered by community groups, as well as giving out grants themselves directly. However, there have been ongoing concerns about the groups receiving funding and it has not been clear how taxpayers’ money has been spent. The TaxPayers’ Alliance has used Freedom of Information requests to compile the data that the Government was unable to give Paul Goodman MP earlier this year. So for the first time, spending on the Prevent Strategy is listed in detail to show how much each organisation received individually in the 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 financial years. The key findings of this report are: Over £12 million has so far been given out by local authorities to fund community groups through Prevent projects. There has been insufficient monitoring of how Prevent money is spent, with the Government unsure of what groups Councils have disbursed money to. This paper managed to get more detailed information on local authorities’ Preventing Violent Extremism grants than that obtained by Paul Goodman MP through parliamentary questions. The TPA has been able to ascertain how much each organisation received, rather than the total amount each local authority received – an itemised account of PVE expenditure. Around £850,000 has been given to the Muslim Council of Britain’s official affiliates through different Prevent funding streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicola Fenton, Outreach Worker – Peterborough & Fenland June 2014
    Nicola Fenton, Outreach Worker – Peterborough & Fenland June 2014 Date Organisation Purpose 3 June Safer Peterborough Partnership Safety Challenge To provide support to this multi-agency event for safety education to primary school children in Peterborough. Mosque Visit organised by Jawaid Khan. Sainsbury’s Outreach at the Police Contact Point in store. 4 June Student Police & Crime Forum @ Ken Stimpson Community School First meeting to establish a forum to provide students with an opportunity to have their say on issues relating to policing and crime. Supported by a PCSO enabling them to feed in to Safer Stronger Neighbourhood meetings. 5 June Southern Neighbourhood Development Team Meeting Invitation to the meeting to observe the partnership working that is undertaken to address the priorities raised at the Safer Stronger Neighbourhood meetings. Hate Crime meeting Discussion with constabulary lead for hate crime on the progress of the strategy and where it can link in with work we are undertaking. 10 Staff meeting, Cambourne Discussed progress of engagement work and other office June information. 11 Sainsbury’s Outreach at the Police Contact Point in store. June 12 Thomas Deacon Academy Community Group Student forum led by the Safer Schools Officer where students June can have their say on local policing and crime issues in their community. Safer Schools Officers re Cadets Introduced the PCC’s volunteer coordinator to the Safer Schools team. Wisbech Youth Development Coordinator To discuss opportunities for youth engagement within Wisbech. 13 Sainsbury’s Outreach at the Police Contact Point in store. June Nicola Fenton, Outreach Worker – Peterborough & Fenland June 2014 Link to Change To find out more about the organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda Medium Term Financial Strategy Budget 2010/11 And
    COUNCIL AGENDA MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL STRATEGY BUDGET 2010/11 AND MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2014/15 BOOK 2 OF 2 COUNCILLOR MARCO CERESTE JOHN A HARRISON LEADER OF THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - STRATEGIC RESOURCES Growing the right way for a bigger, better Peterborough CONTENTS COUNCIL REPORT 1 Appendix A - Council Tax Resolution 4 Appendix B - Cabinet Recommendations to Council 11 MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2010/11 – 2014/15 The Medium Term Financial Plan in the context of the Community 24 Strategy Medium Term Financial Plan Summary and Chief Financial 26 Officer Report Appendix 1a – Key Figures 34 Appendix 1b – Capacity Bids 35 Appendix 1c – Savings and Transformation 37 Appendix 1d – City Services Savings 38 Appendix 1e – Reserves 39 Appendix 1f – Schedule of Grants 40 Appendix 1g – Fees and Charges 44 Appendix 2 – Budget Monitoring Report Period 7 50 Appendix 3 – Capital Strategy, Programme and Disposals 62 Summary Appendix 4 – Prudential Code, Treasury Management Strategy 82 and Minimum Revenue Provision Strategy Appendix 5 – Asset Management Plan 101 Appendix 6 – Adult Social Care Annual Accountability Agreement 177 Appendix 7 – Budget consultation Feedback 202 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM th 24 FEBRUARY 2010 PUBLIC REPORT BUDGET 2010/11 AND MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN (MTFP) TO 2014/15 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S FROM : Executive Director - Strategic Resources That Council is recommended to approve: a. The revenue budget for 2010/11 and the medium term financial plan for 2011/12 to 2014/15, set in the context of the Sustainable Community Strategy; b. The capital programme for 2010/11 to 2014/15 and related strategies and indicators; c.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2021
    Monday – September 2021 Activity Dates Time Venue Description Contact These Strength and Balance Let's Get Moving exercise sessions are based on Strength and gentle body movement to improve muscle Balance Let’s Dementia Resource and joint movement and increase balance 8 week block Get Moving 10.00am – Centre, 5 York Road, and mobility. Although it is a group activity, Vivacity 13, 20, 27 Exercise Class 11.00am Millfield, Peterborough, exercises are based on individual ability 01733 863600 September Delivered by - PE1 3BP and pace so that everyone can benefit and Vivacity be part of it. First 8 weeks free. Invitation only Carers The Carers Information and Support Information and Programme provides information on all Dementia 4 week block 2.00pm - Dementia Resource Support aspects of caring for a person with Resource Centre 20, 27 September 4.15pm Centre Programme dementia in a group environment. 01733 865710 (CrISP 2) Invitation only Tuesday – September 2021 Activity Dates Time Venue Description Contact Arts and Crafts Dementia Resource For anyone diagnosed with dementia that 6 week block Dementia Delivered by - 10.00am – Centre, 5 York Road, enjoys arts & crafts Starting: Resource Centre Peterborough City 12 noon Millfield, Peterborough, There will be a charge to attend this group 7 September 01733 865710 College PE1 3BP Invitation only First Tuesday of Broadway Theatre Session of singing, music for people living Dementia Singing for the every month 10.30am - 46 Broadway, with dementia and their carers. Resource Centre Brain® Starting: 12.00 noon Peterborough Invitation only 01733 865710 7 September PE1 1RS Four sessions Open Peer A group for carers of people with dementia.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Let Index Linked Industrial Investment
    LONG LET INDEX LINKED INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY KINGSBRIDGE CENTRE | STURROCK WAY | PETERBOROUGH | PE3 8TZ INVESTMENT SUMMARY • Peterborough is one of the UK’s fastest growing cities and an important regional centre for commerce and industry. • The city benefits fromstrong transport links via the A1(M) north- south trunk road which provides direct access to the M25 (J23), the national motorway network and the east coast commercial ports of Felixstowe and Harwich. • The Kingsbridge Centre is strategically located next to Junction 17 of the A47 which in turn provides direct access to the A1(M) and the A14. • The property comprises a modern terrace of five industrial units totalling 160,510 sq ft (14,911.87 sq m). • Multi let to two tenants including E-Leather Ltd and Finning (UK) Ltd generating a rental income of £740,854.40 per annum (average passing rent of £4.62 per sq ft). • The property benefits from an attractiveAWULT of 15 years to expiry and 9.4 years to break. • E-Leather have recently signed a reversionary lease until March 2036 (tenant break option March 2029) and Finning have removed their break demonstrating commitment to the building and location. • E-Leather’s lease benefits from5 yearly index linked RPI rent reviews subject to a collar and cap of 1.5% - 4% (compounded). • The site extends to 4.01 hectares (9.92 acres) providing a low site coverage of 34%. • Freehold. • Both tenants have a Dun & Bradstreet rating of 5A1 representing a ‘minimum risk’ of business failure. • The property is used by E-Leather as their global HQ and main distribution facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Post 16 Transport 2021
    Peterborough Post 16 Transport Partnership Policy Effective from September 2021 People and Communities Peterborough City Council Ground Floor Sand Martin House Bittern Way Fletton Quays Peterborough PE2 8TY Post 16 Transport 2021-2022 Page 1 of 18 Peterborough City Council Post -16 Transport Policy 2021-2022 1 Introduction 1.1 Who is the policy for: This policy covers post 16 students who are living in Peterborough (their parent/carer paying Council Tax to Peterborough City Council (PCC)) and attending school or college in or outside Peterborough. This policy applies to home to school/college transport for students who are aged 16-18 (on 31st August of the relevant year), or who are continuing on a course which they started prior to their 19th birthday. All charges and material charges shown in this policy are effective from September 2021. 1.2 How the policy has been changed The Post 16 Transport Policy has changed as follows: . Increase in parental contribution This policy is based on the following documents and guidance: . Post-16 transport and travel support to education and training – statutory guidance for local authorities January 2019 . Sustainable School Transport Policy (August 2009) . Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Transport Plan 2021 . Peterborough Long Term Transport Strategy (LTTS) (2011-2026) . www.gov.uk/1619-bursary-fund/further-information . https://www.gov.uk/care-to-learn/how-to-claim 1.3. Vision Our vision is to promote and facilitate the use of travel by sustainable modes by young people, families, and school staff, and provide information so they are able to make informed transport decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017/18
    Thomas Deacon Education Trust Unity of Purpose, Diversity of Practice Annual Report 2017/18 The Thomas Deacon Education Trust (TDET) is a Multi-Academy Trust that unites and empowers like-minded schools to achieve the very best for their students and communities. We are unashamedly proud of our links to the city of Peterborough and its surrounding areas. We share the city’s ambitious vision for growth and believe that our schools and the education of young people need to be at the heart of these plans. As a Trust, we work across all key phases of education to provide every child in our community with the best life chances and high aspirations. By focussing on the city of Peterborough and its immediate surroundings, the Trust’s schools are in close proximity of on another. This close-working partnership and understanding of the local context enables real and meaningful collaboration between our schools, teachers, and students, and with local business leaders. We actively encourage our schools and teachers to share best practice to benefit all children within the local area. All members of our Trust – our schools, members of staff, students and communities – are united in purpose through a set of shared, common values and expectations: 1. Trust – we are honest and supportive 2. Diversity – we celebrate individual differences and needs 3. Excellence – we want the very best and never give up on doing what is right 4. Transformation – we embrace innovation and collaboration Through experience, we know that there is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all approach to education.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Ready to Come to College
    GET READY TO COME TO COLLEGE Our Guide to Keeping You Safe Welcome Peterborough College Get Ready to Come to College Peterborough College Get Ready to Come to College Contents WELCOME CONTENTS Keeping You Safe: Our 7 Point Plan ............................. 4 Your health, safety and wellbeing are our Moving Around Our Campuses .......................................7 number one priority and we have been working hard to get our campuses ready Staying Safe On Campus ......................................................8 for you to safely come to College. Travel .................................................................................................10 We have put a number of safety and Keeping Safe Code of Conduct ....................................... 11 social distancing measures in place to provide a safe and compliant environment and minimise the risk to you and your teachers. You will find in the following pages the measures we have introduced that you need to be aware of. 2 3 Keeping You Safe: Our 7 Point Plan Peterborough College Get Ready to Come to College Peterborough College Get Ready to Come to College Keeping You Safe: Our 7 Point Plan KEEPING YOU SAFE: MOVING AROUND OUR 7 POINT PLAN CAMPUS To help you move around our 3 buildings at a safe distance, we have introduced designated entrance points, one-way systems and clearly SOCIAL marked out our corridors. DISTANCING All of our classrooms, We recognise that 1 workshops and social some people are not spaces have already yet confident being been arranged to make around others so we have sure we meet social introduced a wristband TWEAKED distancing guidelines. scheme. These can be requested by emailing TIMETABLES Face coverings will Well-BeingCentre@ have to be worn when peterborough.ac.uk who We have tweaked our timetables, to avoid travelling on College 4 overcrowding in our entrances, cafés and can asses your needs.
    [Show full text]