DOCSLIB.ORG

Lojze Peterle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lojze Peterle Alojz Peterle Member of the European Parliament Former Prime Minister of Slovenia Brussels, 8 January 2018 Dear President of the European Parliament Mr Antonio Tajani, Dear President of the European Commission Mr Jean-Claude Juncker, Dear President of the European Council Mr Donald Tusk, I am writing to you as former Prime Minister and former Minister of Foreign Affairs who has been closely engaged in the question of the border dispute between Slovenia and Croatia already since 1991. Over all these years I have held various political positions which gave me the opportunity to do everything that was in my power to strengthen the relations between our two neighbouring countries. I have strongly supported Croatia on its journey towards sovereign statehood and the European Union. I feel honoured that I was award with high state honours by the Republic of Croatia for my contribution in this regard. Six months after the binding arbitration ruling, the decision of the Court is still not been implemented. This raises great concerns not only in Slovenia. Instead of respect for international law we are witnessing new politicising on nationalistic grounds. Political will that ignores law is being expressed and threats to international peace have been made, especially in relation to calls for a civil naval invasion of Croatia against Slovenia. I do not believe civil pressure can replace what state institutions ought to do. Since the deadline for implementation of the decision of the Court has passed half a year ago we no longer have time for additional political considerations nor for renewed politicisation - now is the time for implementation of the Court’s ruling based on international law. Moreover, this is not just about the border between Slovenia and Croatia, this is also about the Schengen Border. If the latter is not clear, we cannot defend it. Allow me to mention some key facts in this regard. Following 25 years of unsuccessful bilateral attempts, Slovenia and Croatia, with the participation of the European Commission, agreed to solve this issue by international arbitration. In the middle of the process, however, EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Rue Wiertz 60, ASP 9E142, B-1047 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 28 45638 | Fax: +32 2 28 49638 [email protected] | www.peterle.eu Croatia qualified some acts of the Slovenian side as controversial and on this ground and with the decision of the Sabor (Croatian parliament) decided to unilaterally withdraw from the proceedings. A crucial legal fact remains that the Court did not agree with the Croatian qualification of the Slovenian acts and consequently continued with its work. A unilateral standpoint of one of the signatories cannot have a higher validity as the Court itself. The Court proceeded without the Slovenian and the Croatian arbitrators and made its decision public on 29 June 2017. From this date on, we speak of implementation. As an advocate of international law I believe there shall not be any authority disregarding the arbitration of the Court or that would impose itself above the Court. Going back to the bilateral level and disregarding the Court as suggested by Croatia, would re-open the issue, which the two countries could not settle bilaterally for half a century. I understand how sensitive this issue is for Croatian political parties, however, the dossier shall not be taken as hostage to the Croatian internal political polarization, let alone the parties’ interests on the European level. It is not a matter of division between the right and the left, it is rather and definitely about whether the rule of law will prevail or not. The agreement itself was under the tutelage of the European Commission and as such, it is co-responsible for its implementation, being the guardian of Treaties and rule of law. Allow me to comment on the Slovenian »blockade« of Croatia, which is being referred to in a manipulative way. Croatia blocked itself when it inserted in the pre-accession documentation an arbitrarily set borderline, which was not agreed. Slovenia supported Croatia in a clear and honest manner in each and any phase of the pre- accession process and reacted only when experts of international law warned it that the unilateral action mentioned ut supra may have consequences for one of the key Slovenian national interests. Croatia has unsettled border disputes with more than just one neighbour. Let us remember that after the agreement was settled, it was regarded as a model for resolution neighbour disputes, among European politicians and legal experts. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Rue Wiertz 60, ASP 9E142, B-1047 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 28 45638 | Fax: +32 2 28 49638 [email protected] | www.peterle.eu In case the European Commission would not fix a clear stance by now, it is possible that it will face reopening the Pandora’s box in the Balkans, which would most certainly impact the European perspective on the Western Balkans. It is not the time to call for peace, but rather to heartedly call for the respect of law. Only respect of law can ensure peace. I thank you for your attention on this matter and send you my best regards and wishes for 2018. Member of the European Parliament, Former Prime Minister and Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Former Vice-President of the European People´s Party EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Rue Wiertz 60, ASP 9E142, B-1047 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 28 45638 | Fax: +32 2 28 49638 [email protected] | www.peterle.eu .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue Hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 Am
    Panel Discussion and Debate ‘the Future of Europe: the Rule of Law’ Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 am. 10.00 Welcome 10.05 Dean of the Faculty of Law, Prof Dr Miha Juhart Netherlands’ Ambassador Pieter J. Langenberg President of the National Assembly, Prof Dr Milan Brglez 10.15 Introduction by Dr Vasilka Sancin, Faculty of Law 10.25 Start of panel discussion 11.10 Public debate and questions 11.30 End of Program The event is organized by the Embassy of the Netherlands, in cooperation with the European Parliament Information Office in Slovenia and the Faculty of Law of the University of Ljubljana. Dr Milan Brglez: politician, political scientists, professor, lawyer President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia from the 1st of August 2014 and Deputy of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia in the Party of Miro Cerar Deputy Group, 2011-2014 Vice President, Slovenian Red Cross, Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences from 2006-2014, covered topics: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, Theory of International Relations, Selected Topics of International Law, Selected Topics of Diplomatic Law, European Protection of Human Rights and Teaching Assistant at the same Faculty of Social Sciences 1996-2006, covered subjects: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, International Law Policy, International Relations Dr Vasilka Sancin: professor, lawyer Vasilka Sancin, a Doctor of Legal Sciences, is an Assistant Professor of International Law and Director of the Institute for International Law and International Relations at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia where she teaches courses in the area of public international law at undergraduate and postgraduate levels.
    [Show full text]
  • SREČANJA STROKOVNIH ZDRUŽENJ Associations Market
    REVIJA SLOVENSKE INDUSTRIJE SREČANJ • SLOVENIAN MEETINGS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE • ŠTEVILKA 3, OKTOBER 2007; ISSUE 3, OCTOBER 2007 SREČANJA STROKOVNIH ZDRUŽENJ Associations Market VLOGA PCO AGENCIJ Role of PCO's PREDSTAVITEV SLOVENSKIH KONGRESNIH PRODUKTOV - ALPE Presentation of Slovenian Congress Products - Alps URADNO GLASILO GLASILO ZAVODA-KONGRESNOTURISTIČNI ZAVODA-KONGRESNOTURISTIČNI URAD URAD • OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE SLOVENIAN CONVENTION BUREAU OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE SLOVENIAN CONVENTION BUREAU Davčni, finančni in pravni informacijski sistem Domov Tax Fin Lex Zbirke Iskanje Portal Tax-Fin-Lex - vsi odgovori na enem mestu Portal Tax-Fin-Lex je osrednje mesto na internetu v Sloveniji, kjer lahko uporabnik dobi konkretne nasvete in ostale informacije z davčnega, računovodsko-finančnega in pravnega področja. V vsaki številki revije Kongres bomo odslej objavili davčni nasvet v zvezi s kongresnim turizmom. VPRAŠANJE: ODGOVOR: Sponzorji in razstavljavci iz V zastavljenem vprašanju navajate različne situacije, pri katerih naročniki iz držav EU, ki plačajo za EU želijo uveljavljati oprostitev plačila DDV, zato vam v nadaljevanju predstavitev na kongresih v podajamo pojasnilo za vsako situacijo posebej ob predpostavki, da so Sloveniji, so oproščeni plačila razstavljavci zavezanci za DDV v drugi državi članici EU. davka po 29. členu DDV. Dogaja pa se, da želijo oprostitev Izobraževanje - kotizacija plačila davka tudi pri plačilu Kraj obdavčitve storitev izobraževanja je opredeljen v a točki 1. odstavka 28. kotizacije, hotelske namestitve, člena Zakona o davku na dodano vrednost - ZDDV-1 (Uradni list RS, št. opreme za razstavni prostor,... 117/2006), v katerem je določeno, da je kraj obdavčitve tam, kjer so storitve dejansko opravljene, če gre za storitve s področja izobraževanja. To pomeni, So upravičeni do oprostitve? da se storitve s področja izobraževanja vedno obdavčujejo po kraju dejanske izvedbe.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Democratic Path After European Union Accession
    The Difficult Look Back: Slovenian Democratic Path after European Union Accession MIRO HAČEK Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 15, No. 3 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2019-0023 Abstract: In the third wave of democratic changes in the early 1990s when the Central and Eastern European (CEE) political landscape changed radically and the democrati‑ sation processes started in the eastern part of the continent, Slovenia was one of the most prominent countries with the best prospects for rapid democratic growth. Slove‑ nia somewhat luckily escaped the Yugoslav civil wars and towards the end of the 20th century was already on the path towards a stable and consolidated democracy with the most successful economy in the entire CEE area. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, Slovenia had a simple and straight ‑forward political goals, i.e. to join the European union as soon as possible, thus consolidating its place among the most developed countries within the region. After some setbacks, this goal was accomplished in (so far) the biggest enlargement to the Union in May 2004. But what happened after Slovenia managed to successfully achieve its pair of major political goals? In this chapter, we search for an answer to this question and find out why Slovenian voters are increas‑ ingly distrustful not only of political institutions, but why so ‑called new political faces and instant political parties are so successful and why Slovenian democracy has lost a leading place among consolidated democracies in CEE. Keywords: Slovenia; European Union; membership; distrust; democracy. Introduction After declaring its independence from former Yugoslavia in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia expressed its willingness and objective, both in its strategic develop‑ ment documents and at the highest political levels, to become a full member of POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 (2019) 3 419 the European Union (EU).1 As the crucial developmental documents2 indicate, the optimum long ‑term development of the Slovenian economy is inextricably tied to Slovenia’s full membership in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Community and the FRY/Belligerents, 1989-1997
    5 Dušan Janjić, team leader Matjaž Klemenčič, team leader Vlado Azinović John Fine Emil Kerenji Albert Bing Zlatko Hadžidedić Vladimir Klemenčič Sumantra Bose Marko Attila Hoare Miloš Ković Daniele Conversi Charles Ingrao Vladimir Petrović Dušan Djordjevich Constantin Iordachi Nikola Samardžić Keith Doubt A. Ross Johnson Brendan Simms Principal author Matjaž Klemenčič acknowledges the extensive input by team members, including several pages of text contributed by Marko Attila Hoare, Charles Ingrao and Albert Bing. Funding from the National Endow- ment for Democracy and the Slovenian Research Council facilitated Prof. Klemenčič’s research, including numerous interviews with Slovenian gov- ernment officials and former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker. Profs. Klemenčič and Dušan Janjić assumed team leadership from John A. Fine (2001-2003) in order to streamline the team’s internet commu- nication. An initial draft was submitted for project-wide review in Novem- ber 2003, which mandated considerable expansion in the chapter’s length and research base. Although the text was adopted following project-wide review in April 2005, further revisions were undertaken in 2008 to address concerns raised by two of the four outside referees in 2010, to accommodate constructive criticism raised in book reviews, and again in 2012 to incorpo- rate new evidence of U.S. and NATO complicity in avoiding the arrest of ICTY indictees. The chapter cites several confidential interviews conducted by SI scholars with several current and former officials from the U.S. State De- partment and IFOR military; in each case their identities have been recorded and stored in the Purdue University archives for later release, upon request, consistent with terms negotiated with each individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilejna Številka Ob 20-Obletnici Samostojnosti Republike Slovenije – Domovine Kranjske Čebele
    SLOVENIJA Slovenski 20 LET letnik CXIV ISSN 0350-4697 čebelar Jubilejna številka ob 20-obletnici samostojnosti Republike Slovenije – domovine kranjske čebele KAZALO a UVODNIK UVODNIK Marko Borko 1 Spoštovane čebelarke in SLOVENIJA 20 LET čebelarji! Mag. Dejan Židan: Slovenski čebelar, izdan ob Pred vami je jubilejna številka 20. obletnici osamosvojitve Slovenije 2 glasila Slovenski čebelar, ki jo iz- Marjan Skok: Nekaj spominov in misli o delu ČZS v obdobju dajamo ob koncu leta 2011, leta, osamosvojitve in mojega mandata predsednika zveze v katerem smo v Sloveniji pra- od leta 1989–1996 3 znovali 20-letnico samostojnosti Marko Borko: Lojze Peterle – predsednik ČZS v obdobju naše države. Na podlagi rezul- 1996–2006 13 tatov plebiscita o samostojnosti Slovenije, ki je bil Marko Borko: Franc Čebulj – predsednik ČZS v obdobju 23. decembra 1990, je bila namreč 25. junija 1991 2006–2007 13 razglašena neodvisnost naše države od SFRJ. Prav Boštjan Noč: ČZS od 2007 naprej pod vodstvom gotovo lahko trdimo, da sta osamosvojitev Sloveni- predsednika Boštjana Noča 13 je ter pozneje vstop v Evropsko unijo pripomogla k Milan Runtas: Kronika tajništva Čebelarske zveze Slovenije pravemu razcvetu čebelarstva. V obdobju od leta 1991–2001 17 1991–2011 se je v slovenskem čebelarstvu zgo- Anton Tomec: Kronika tajništva Čebelarske zveze Slovenije dilo in spremenilo veliko, razvoj v tem obdobju pa 2001–2011 28 je prepoznan tudi navzven. Nedavno je predsednik Vlado Pušnik: Deset let od odprtja Čebelarskega centra neke tuje čebelarske zveze Čebelarsko zvezo Slo- Slovenije 34 venije opisal kot svetilnik čebelarstva na Balkanu in v Evropi, saj se od nje vsi učijo, kako je treba delati.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia Political Briefing: Vote of No Confidence Against the Minister of Interior Helena Motoh
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 32, No. 1 (Sl) September 2020 Slovenia political briefing: Vote of no confidence against the Minister of Interior Helena Motoh 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Vote of no confidence against the Minister of Interior Summary After it was postponed for summer months due to his attempted resignation, Minister of Interior, Aleš Hojs, passed a vote of no confidence on September 19. Although the initial accusations were focused on his alleged misconduct in the case of a concert of a highly controversial Croatian singer, a number of other criticisms followed. Most of them were directed at his interventions in the work of the Police force and National Investigation Bureau. Predictably, due to the coalition voting discipline, he passed the vote with a tight majority of 43 votes against and 38 for the no confidence motion. Shortly after the vote, Prime Minister Janša also closed the open issue of Hojs’ attempted resignation and prolonged the Minister’s mandate. Background: Hojs’ political career and his role in the initial period of Janša’s government Current Minister of Interior, Aleš Hojs, has a long political career. While working in several infrastructure institutions and state companies, he has already been a member of right- wing Slovenian Christian Democrats since its beginnings in 1989 and became more politically active in the party after is split with People’s Party , when it was renamed New Slovenia (NSi).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Marc L. Greenberg Dept. of Slavic Languages & Literatures University of Kansas (785) 864-2349 (voice) Wescoe Hall (785) 864-4298 (fax) 1445 Jayhawk Blvd., Room 2133 [email protected] Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7594, USA Present position: Chair, Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures; Professor of Slavic Languages & Literatures; Professor of Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies, University of Kansas (KU); Courtesy Professor of Linguistics; European Studies Program (Core Faculty Member) Education PhD: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1990, UCLA. Thesis: A Historical Analysis of the Phonology and Accentua- tion of the Prekmurje Dialect of Slovene; Co-Chairs: Henrik Birnbaum, Alan Timberlake. MA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1984, University of Chicago BA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1983, UCLA; Magna cum Laude (For details of study abroad in former USSR, former Yugoslavia, Hungary and former Czechoslovakia, see below under Foreign experience.) Employment, positions, rank 2012– Chair, Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures, KU 2012 Acting Associate Dean, Humanities, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, (6-mo. appt.) 2001– Full Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 2000–11 Department Chair, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures 1995– Associate Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 2001 1990–95 Assistant Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 1990 Slovene language instructor, intensive 1st year course, Summer Workshop in East European Lan- guages, Indiana U., Bloomington 1986–87 Russian language graduate teaching assistant, 2nd year Russian, UCLA; 1st and 2nd year Russian, Self-paced (individualized) program, UCLA Honors/Awards 2004 Award for Outstanding Achievement in the field of Slovene Studies, Slavic Studies Society of Slove- nia, Novo mesto, Slovenia, October 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Book
    Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Boduszyński, Mieczysław P. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Boduszyński, Mieczysław P. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States: Divergent Paths toward a New Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.473. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/473 [ Access provided at 25 Sep 2021 03:15 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Democratic Transition and Consolidation Jorge I. Domínguez and Anthony Jones, Series Editors Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Divergent Paths toward a New Europe Mieczysław P. Boduszyn´ski The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore © 2010 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2010 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Boduszyn´ski, Mieczysław P., 1974– Regime change in the Yugoslav successor states : divergent paths toward a new Europe / Mieczysław P. Boduszyn´ski. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8018-9429-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8018-9429-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Regime change—Former Yugoslav republics. 2. Self-determination, National—Former Yugoslav republics. 3. Post-communism—Former Yugoslav republics. 4. Democracy—Former Yugoslav republics. 5. Former Yugoslav republics—Politics and government.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents and Their Speeches at National Commemorations
    PRESIDENTS AND THEIR SPEECHES AT NATIONAL COMMEMORATIONS SAšA BABIČ AND JURIJ FIKFAK Presidents, prime ministers, and similar leaders occupy a Med heroji in slavnimi osebnostmi imajo posebno mesto special place among heroes and celebrities. They are special in predsedniki držav, vlad ipd. Posebni so na več načinov, npr. many ways, not least because their privileged position, attained s tem, da jih že njihov privilegirani položaj, na katerega so through a general or parliamentary elections, already places prišli po splošnih volitvah ali volitvah v parlamentu posta- them at the center of public discourse. This allows them—and vlja v središče javnih diskurzov. Na ta način jim omogoča in at the same time requires them—to express their opinions on hkrati od njih zahteva izjavljanje o najrazličnejših temah, a broad range of topics, events, and other issues. A previously dogodkih ipd. Včerajšnji “navadni” posameznik naenkrat “ordinary” individual suddenly becomes a central figure that postane osrednja figura, ki določa, katere teme so priori- determines which topics take priority, which discourses are tetne, kateri diskurzi so politično korektni itd. Osrednji politically correct, and so on. This article mainly focuses on fokus besedila avtorjev je analiza konceptualnih metafor v analyzing the conceptual metaphors found in the speeches of govorih nekaterih tujih in štirih slovenskih predsednikov ob four Slovenian presidents and selected leaders of other countri- različnih, predvsem državotvornih ritualih. es at various events, especially those involving state-building. Ključne besede: predsednik, govor, diskurz, konceptualna Keywords: president, speech, discourse, conceptual metaphor metafora Presidents, prime ministers, and other leaders have a special place among the heroes and celebrities discussed in three publications (Jezernik 2013, Fikfak 2014, and Dan Podjed in this issue) issued as part of the Heroes and Celebrities1 research project.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 3: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006 Country: Slovenia Date of Election: 4 December 2011 (early elections) Prepared by: Janez Štebe and Simona Kustec Lipicer Date of Preparation: 13 May 2015 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [X] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [X] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 3: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election? 2007-: Dr. Danilo Türk, as independent president 2b. What was the party of the Prime Minister prior to the most recent election? 2008-2012: Primer Minister Borut Pahor, the president of the Social Democrats (SD) 2c.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE on DISARMAMENT CD/PV.690 1 September 1994
    CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT CD/PV.690 1 September 1994 ENGLISH FINAL RECORD OF THE SIX HUNDRED AND NINETIETH PLENARY MEETING Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Thursday, 1 September 1994, at 10 a.m. President: Mr. Sirous Nasseri (Islamic Republic of Iran) GE.94-64190 (E) CD/PV.690 2 The PRESIDENT: I declare open the 690th plenary meeting of the Conference on Disarmament. On behalf of the Conference, and on my own behalf, I should like to extend a warm welcome to our distinguished guest speakers today: the foreign ministers of Slovenia, Slovakia and the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan. It is a pleasure and honour to have them with us today and their presence testifies to the abiding interest of their Governments in our work and to the importance they attach to the multilateral approach to arms limitation and disarmament. I am sure we are all looking forward to hearing their statements. I also have on my list of speakers for today the representatives of the Netherlands, Sweden, Pakistan, Brazil and the chairmen of the four ad hoc committees as well as the representative of India. I should now like to give the floor to His Excellency the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Slovenia, Mr. Lojze Peterle. Mr. PETERLE (Slovenia): Mr. President, at the end of the third session of the Conference, allow me to wish you every success in concluding this year’s work of the Conference on Disarmament and to express my thanks to you as well as to previous chairmen for successful leadership of the Conference.
    [Show full text]