DOCSLIB.ORG

Revenge of the Allies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revenge of the Allies Revenge of the Allies A look at the Allied “Revenge Bombings” in Dresden, Berlin, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki During WWII By Clint Tryon and Edward Stevens Part 1: Blitzkrieg As the Axis forces swept across the world by land, air, and sea, they left an unprecedented trail of death and destruction in their wake. Battle of Britain/The Blitz, 1940-1941: ● June 17th, 1940-France signed Armistice, Nazis control all of W. Europe(2). ● Conquest crippled Nazi Navy, amphibious assault on Britain impossible(2). ● Britain was bombed repeatedly from mid 1940 to early 1941(2). ● Accounts describing the “Battle of Britain” refer to these bombings but disagree on beginning/end dates. ● “The Blitz” refers to bombings in london that lasted through 1941(1). ● June 1940-May 1941(1, 2). ○ The Battle begins in June with small daytime and nighttime raids on ports and towns with aircraft factories(1). ○ Attacks amped up in July, south and east coasts attacked. RAF HQs, Airfields, and Aircraft industry targeted(1). ○ In mid august, large-scale daytime attacks launched on southeast england(1). ○ From Sep. 7th onward until May 1941, the Luftwaffe launches large-scale attacks on London. This marks the beginning of “The Blitz”(1, 2, 4). ○ 448 civilians killed on the first day of The Blitz(4). ● The Battle of Britain resulted in over 40,000 civilian deaths, as well as the deaths of 1,544 RAF servicemen and women(3). Battle of Britain/The Blitz Sources 1. RAF Museum Staff. "Introduction to the Phases of the Battle of Britain." RAF Museum. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/history-of-the-battle-of-britain/introduction-to-the-phases-of-the- battle-of-britain.aspx. 2. History.com Staff. "Battle of Britain." History.com. 2009. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://www.history.com/topics/world- war-ii/battle-of-britain. 3. Boren, Zachary Davies. "Battle of Britain 75th anniversary: The staggering numbers behind the four-month war over UK's skies." The Independent. July 10, 2015. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/battle- of-britain-75th-anniversary-the-staggering-numbers-behind-the-four-month-war-over-uks-skies-10380910.html. 4. "The Blitz begins." History.com. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-blitz-begins. 5. Bomb damage in the centre of Coventry, England, two days after the German Luftwaffe air raid on the night of 14 November 1940. Digital image. RAFMuseum.co.uk. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/images/online_exhibitions/H5600LG.jpg. The Bombings at Coventry, 1940 ● Coventry is a large city situated in the south of England. ● In 1940, Coventry city officials reported that the city had anywhere between 190,000 and 250,000 residents(5). ● Coventry was a large industrial city important to the British war effort(3) ○ During WWI, armament factories were constructed around the city. Many were re-used during WWII. ○ Several other coventry manufacturing plants were converted into armament factories. ○ These factories produced Ammunition, vehicle parts, and radio equipment crucial to the British war machine. ● At around 7:10 pm on the 14th of November, 1940, the first bombs of the coventry raid fell after little warning or attempt at interception from the RAF(5). ● The raid continued until 6 am on the 15th of November(5). ● 449 bombers flew over Coventry that night, dropping over 31,000 bombs on the city(5). ● Of those bombs, approximately 30,000 were incendiary bombs meant to inflict more severe damage(2, 5). ● Another 1,200 to 1,600 High Explosive bombs were dropped on the city that night(5). ● During the bombings, 568 people were killed, with 863 seriously injured and another 393 less seriously so(5). ● 111 of Coventry’s 180 factories were damaged, with 75 being put out of commission permanently(5). ● Coventry also lost thousands of homes, businesses, and irreplaceable historic buildings(1, 4, 5). ● The attack was one of the most devastating in the war at the time(1). The Bombings at Coventry Sources: 1. "BBC ON THIS DAY | 15 | 1940: Germans bomb Coventry to destruction." BBC News. November 15, 1940. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/15/newsid_3522000/3522785.stm. 2. "The raid begins." Coventry's Blitz: The raid begins. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.historiccoventry.co.uk/blitz/blitz.php?pg=the-raid. 3. "Why Coventry?" Coventry's Blitz: Why Coventry? Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.historiccoventry.co.uk/blitz/blitz.php?pg=why-cov. 4. "What did Coventry lose?" Coventry's Blitz: What did Coventry lose? Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.historiccoventry.co.uk/blitz/blitz.php?pg=damage. 5. "Some blitz statistics." Coventry's Blitz: Some blitz statistics. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.historiccoventry.co.uk/blitz/blitz.php?pg=stats. 6. Three British women walk among the rubble left after a Luftwaffe attack on Britain in 1940. Digital image. BBC.co.uk. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/B18F/production/_86655454_gettyimages- 3356152.jpg. Pearl Harbor, 1941 ● Pearl Harbor, in Hawaii, was the United States’ main base of operations in the pacific in 1941. ○ The entire US Pacific Fleet of 9 battleships, 3 aircraft carriers, 2 heavy cruisers, 6 light cruisers, and 30 destroyers.(1) ○ In addition, nearly 100 smaller ships were stationed at Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941.(1) ○ The Pearl Harbor Navy complex also housed hundreds of airplanes at the time.(3, 4) ● American strategists expected the Japanese to attack Manila, the Dutch East Indies, Singapore, or Indochina (all European or American colonies), rather than attack Pearl Harbor.(3) ● The attack came on the morning of Sunday, December 7th, at 7:55 am Hawaii time. (3, 4) ● 360 Japanese Warplanes, launched from japanese aircraft carriers, attacked the island with machine guns and bombs.(3, 4) ● Several midget submarines were also dispatched towards Pearl Harbor, although the damage they caused was negligible.(3, 4) ● In the course of the attacks, 2,403 Americans (civilians among them) were killed and roughly 1,200 more were wounded.(3, 4) ● All 9 American battleships were damaged, with only two being deemed salvageable. Another 11 American ships were severely damaged. The 3 aircraft carriers were out of the port at the time, and escaped the attacks unscathed. (3, 4) ● Over 300 American planes were destroyed as well. (3) ● By contrast, the Japanese lost only 30 planes, 5 Midget Submarines, and fewer than 100 men. (3, 4) Pearl Harbor Sources 1. "Ships Present at Pearl Harbor." Naval History and Heritage Command. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/s/ships-present-at-pearl- harbor.html. 2. "Pearl Harbor Attack: CinCPac Damage Report." Pearl Harbor Attack: CinCPac Damage Report. Accessed March 06, 2018. http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/rep/Pearl/CinCPac-Damage.html. 3. History.com Staff. "Pearl Harbor." History.com. 2009. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://www.history.com/topics/world-war- ii/pearl-harbor. 4. "Pearl Harbor bombed." History.com. Accessed March 04, 2018. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/pearl-harbor- bombed. 5. An American warship sinks in Pearl Harbor following the devastating Japanese surprise attack in 1941. Digital image. Www.Britannica.com. Accessed March 04, 2018. https://amedia.britannica.com/700x450/19/192919-049-61E0CA86.jpg. Part 2: Revenge After the Battle of Britain and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Allied forces retaliated with damaging air assaults on crucial targets in Axis territory. Berlin, 1940-1945 “...the British conducted the indiscriminate bombing of cities and the US sought to destroy military and industrial targets.” -- Mark Selden, Research Associate at the East Asia Program at Cornell University(10) ● Berlin, the Capital of Nazi Germany, was bombed sporadically throughout the course of WWII. ● The first such bombing was on August 25th, 1940(1) ○ Luftwaffe bombers dropped several bombs on London on August 24th, 1940(1) ○ Though this was likely by mistake (it was in violation of Hitler’s orders), churchill ordered a retaliatory strike on Berlin(1, 2) ○ On the night of August 25th, over 70 RAF bombers (Armstrong Whitworth Whitleys, Handley Page Hampdens, and Vickers Wellingtons) flew over Berlin and unleashed a relatively small payload of bombs on the city(2) ○ Heavy AA fire prevented them from being accurate; the bombs caused negligible damage and no loss of life(2). ● Bombers used in the 1940 attack: ○ A. W. Whitley: ■ The RAF’s primary heavy bomber through 1942. Considered ugly/clunky, but could carry 7,000 lbs of bombs and packed a quad 7.7mm gun in the rear and another single on the nose.(3) ■ RAF’s only heavy bomber capable of the range necessary for this mission.(3) Berlin, 1940-1945 (Cont.) ● Bombers used in the 1940 attack (Cont.): ○ H. P. Hampden and Vickers Wellington ■ Both twin-engine medium bombers, they could carry 4,000lbs and 2,000kg (roughly 4,400lbs), respectively(4, 5). The efficiency of Medium bombers helped slightly extend their range. ■ The Hampden had 1 fixed Vickers .303 on the nose and 1-2 on the rear, leaving it vulnerable to Luftwaffe fighters. The Vickers packed 2 7.7mm on the nose, 4 7.7mm on the tail, and 2 7.7mm on the waist(4, 5). ● The “Battle of Berlin” ○ Began November 18, 1943, when Air Marshal A. T. Harris ordered an RAF bombing campaign on Berlin(6). ○ Wanted to scare/kill civilians, similar to Hitler’s aims after the 1940 bombing of Berlin(6).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II
    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II ORREST LEE “WOODY” VOSLER of Lyndonville, Quick Write New York, was a radio operator and gunner during F World War ll. He was the second enlisted member of the Army Air Forces to receive the Medal of Honor. Staff Sergeant Vosler was assigned to a bomb group Time and time again we read about heroic acts based in England. On 20 December 1943, fl ying on his accomplished by military fourth combat mission over Bremen, Germany, Vosler’s servicemen and women B-17 was hit by anti-aircraft fi re, severely damaging it during wartime. After reading the story about and forcing it out of formation. Staff Sergeant Vosler, name Vosler was severely wounded in his legs and thighs three things he did to help his crew survive, which by a mortar shell exploding in the radio compartment. earned him the Medal With the tail end of the aircraft destroyed and the tail of Honor. gunner wounded in critical condition, Vosler stepped up and manned the guns. Without a man on the rear guns, the aircraft would have been defenseless against German fi ghters attacking from that direction. Learn About While providing cover fi re from the tail gun, Vosler was • the development of struck in the chest and face. Metal shrapnel was lodged bombers during the war into both of his eyes, impairing his vision. Able only to • the development of see indistinct shapes and blurs, Vosler never left his post fi ghters during the war and continued to fi re.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Japan 'Back'?
    IS JAPAN ‘BACK’? Japan Society of Northern California/Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, May 9th 2013 SOME PRELMINARY OBSERVATIONS SOME PRELMINARY “It is the one sphere of life and activity where victory, security and success is always to the minority and never to the majority. When you find any one agreeing with you, change your mind.” Keynes, speaking of Investment, 1937 5/8/2013 2 SUMMARY o Causes of Japan’s “Lost Decades” o First – Strategic irrelevance post-1989 o Second – early ‘90s headwinds strong in proportion to the size of the bubble o Third - 1997-2012- persistent macro-economic policy mistakes. o No insuperable “structural problems o Last headwinds dropped to nothing in 2009 o Senkaku spat marks Japan’s recovery of a strategic role o “Abe-nomics” represents reversal of the mistakes of 1997-2012 o Anyway, monetary policy has actually been loose since 3/11 o Deflation may already be over o PM Abe may just be “in the right place at the right time” o Both the initial, long period of error and its reversal echo the ‘30s. 5/8/2013 3 WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED? Is Real Life lived in Real or Nominal Numbers? Year Nominal GDP Population Nominal GDP/head Real GDP Real GDP/head (Y mil) (Thou) (Y mil) (Y mil) (Y mil) 1995 501,707 125,570 4.00 455,460 3.63 2000 509,860 126,926 4.02 474,847 3.74 2005 503,903 127,768 3.94 503,921 3.94 2010 482,384 128,057 3.77 512,364 4.00 2011 470,623 127,799 3.68 509,450 3.99 Period Nominal GDP per Capita Real GDP per Capita Change 1995-2011 -7.8% 9.9% 2000-2011 -8.3% 6.6% Note: GDP for Fiscal Years, Seasonally
    [Show full text]
  • World War II
    World War II. – “The Blitz“ This information report describes the events of “The Blitz” during the Second World War in London. The attacks between 7th September 1940 and 10 th May 1941 are known as “The Blitz”. The report is based upon information from http://www.secondworldwar.co.uk/ , http://www.worldwar2database.com/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blitz . Prelude to the War in London The Second World War started on 1 st September 1939 with the German attack on Poland. The War in London began nearly one year later. On 24 th August 1940 the German Air Force flew an attack against Thames Haven, whereby some German bombers dropped bombs on London. At this time London was not officially a target of the German Air Force. As a return, the Royal Air Force attacked Berlin. On 5th September 1940 Hitler ordered his troops to attack London by day and by night. It was the beginning of the Second World War in London. Attack on Thames Haven in 1940 The Attacks First phase The first phase of the Second World War in London was from early September 1940 to mid November 1940. In this first phase of the Second World War Hitler achieved great military success. Hitler planned to destroy the Royal Air Force to achieve his goal of British invasion. His instruction of a sustainable bombing of London and other major cities like Birmingham and Manchester began towards the end of the Battle of Britain, which the British won. Hitler ordered the German Air Force to switch their attention from the Royal Air Force to urban centres of industrial and political significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University
    INCENDIARY WARS: The Transformation of United States Air Force Bombing Policy in the WWII Pacific Theater Gilad Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University Faculty Advisor: Professor Mark Mazower Second Reader: Professor Alan Brinkley INCENDIARY WARS 1 Note to the Reader: For the purposes of this essay, I have tried to adhere to a few conventions to make the reading easier. When referring specifically to a country’s aerial military organization, I capitalize the name Air Force. Otherwise, when simply discussing the concept in the abstract, I write it as the lower case air force. In accordance with military standards, I also capitalize the entire name of all code names for operations (OPERATION MATTERHORN or MATTERHORN). Air Force’s names are written out (Twentieth Air Force), the bomber commands are written in Roman numerals (XX Bomber Command, or simply XX), while combat groups are given Arabic numerals (305th Bomber Group). As the story shifts to the Mariana Islands, Twentieth Air Force and XXI Bomber Command are used interchangeably. Throughout, the acronyms USAAF and AAF are used to refer to the United States Army Air Force, while the abbreviation of Air Force as “AF” is used only in relation to a numbered Air Force (e.g. Eighth AF). Table of Contents: Introduction 3 Part I: The (Practical) Prophets 15 Part II: Early Operations Against Japan 43 Part III: The Road to MEETINGHOUSE 70 Appendix 107 Bibliography 108 INCENDIARY WARS 2 Introduction Curtis LeMay sat awake with his trademark cigar hanging loosely from his pursed ever-scowling lips (a symptom of his Bell’s Palsy, not his demeanor), with two things on his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)
    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Threat Assessment Project Name Young’s Builders Merchant Client Cassidy Group Site Address Common Lane, Corley, Coventry, Warwickshire, CV7 8AQ Report Reference 2846PS00 Revision 00 Date 18th November 2015 Originator PS Find us on Twitter and Facebook st 1 Line Defence Limited Company No: 7717863 VAT No: 128 8833 79 Unit 3, Maple Park, Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Herts. EN11 0EX www.1stlinedefence.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 [email protected] Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Threat Assessment Young’s Builders Merchant Cassidy Group Executive Summary Site Location The site is situated in Corley, within the district of Coventry, Warwickshire, approximately 7.3km north-west of the city centre. The site is surrounded in all directions by agricultural fields and residential properties and small vegetated areas. The proposed site is an irregular shaped parcel of land. Half of the site consists of several small structures associated with the builders’ yard and large piles of building materials. The other half of the site appears to be an area of open land. The site is centred on the approximate OS grid reference: SP 2855285310 Proposed Works The proposed works include further investigations to assess the level of contamination on the site and the removal of all building materials and hard-standings. The entirety of the site will then be remediated and returned to pastoral/arable land or residential development. Geology and Bomb Penetration Depth Site specific geological data / borehole information is not available at the site at the time of writing this report so maximum bomb penetration depth cannot be calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blitz and Its Legacy
    THE BLITZ AND ITS LEGACY 3 – 4 SEPTEMBER 2010 PORTLAND HALL, LITTLE TITCHFIELD STREET, LONDON W1W 7UW ABSTRACTS Conference organised by Dr Mark Clapson, University of Westminster Professor Peter Larkham, Birmingham City University (Re)planning the Metropolis: Process and Product in the Post-War London David Adams and Peter J Larkham Birmingham City University [email protected] [email protected] London, by far the UK’s largest city, was both its worst-damaged city during the Second World War and also was clearly suffering from significant pre-war social, economic and physical problems. As in many places, the wartime damage was seized upon as the opportunity to replan, sometimes radically, at all scales from the City core to the county and region. The hierarchy of plans thus produced, especially those by Abercrombie, is often celebrated as ‘models’, cited as being highly influential in shaping post-war planning thought and practice, and innovative. But much critical attention has also focused on the proposed physical product, especially the seductively-illustrated but flawed beaux-arts street layouts of the Royal Academy plans. Reconstruction-era replanning has been the focus of much attention over the past two decades, and it is appropriate now to re-consider the London experience in the light of our more detailed knowledge of processes and plans elsewhere in the UK. This paper therefore evaluates the London plan hierarchy in terms of process, using new biographical work on some of the authors together with archival research; product, examining exactly what was proposed, and the extent to which the different plans and different levels in the spatial planning hierarchy were integrated; and impact, particularly in terms of how concepts developed (or perhaps more accurately promoted) in the London plans influenced subsequent plans and planning in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • October 19, 1987 – Black Monday, 20 Years Later BACKGROUND
    October 19, 1987 – Black Monday, 20 Years Later BACKGROUND On Oct. 19, 1987, “Black Monday,” the DJIA fell 507.99 (508) points to 1,738.74, a drop of 22.6% or $500 billion dollars of its value-- the largest single-day percentage drop in history. Volume surges to a then record of 604 million shares. Two days later, the DJIA recovered 289 points or 16.6% of its loss. It took two years for the DJIA to fully recover its losses, setting the stage for the longest bull market in U.S. history. Date Close Change Change % 10/19/87 1,738.70 -508.00 -22.6 10/20/87 1,841.00 102.30 5.9 10/21/87 2,027.90 186.90 10.2 Quick Facts on October 11, 1987 • DJIA fell 507.99 points to 1,738.74, a 22.6% drop (DJIA had opened at 2246.74 that day) o Record decline at that time o Friday, Oct. 16, DJIA fell 108 points, completing a 9.5 percent drop for the week o Aug. 1987, DJIA reached 2722.42, an all-time high; up 48% over prior 10 months o Today, DJIA above 14,000 • John Phelan, NYSE Chairman/CEO -- Credited with effective management of the crisis. A 23-year veteran of the trading floor, he became NYSE president in 1980 and chairman and chief executive officer in 1984, serving until 1990 NYSE Statistics (1987, then vs. now) 1987 Today (and current records) ADV - ytd 1987 (thru 10/19): 181.5 mil ADV – 1.76 billion shares (NYSE only) shares 10/19/1987: 604.3 million shares (reference ADV above) 10/20/1987: 608.1* million shares (reference ADV above) Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Dossier of Finnish Marshal C.G.E. Mannerheim: on the Diplomatic Prelude of World War II Toomas VARRAK* Abstract Introduction
    The Secret Dossier of Finnish Marshal C.G.E. Mannerheim: On the Diplomatic Prelude of World War II Toomas VARRAK* Abstract Introduction In addition to oral tradition, the knowledge The standard historical presentation and understanding of history is based on of WWII can be epitomised as a written sources. Therefore it is highly significant narrative about a clash between when research is able to introduce hitherto good and evil in which victory is unknown material that can shed new light on inveterate truths. This was the case with the rightfully won by the good. That study “Finland at the Epicentre of the Storm” standard was cast into serious doubt by Finnish historian Erkki Hautamäki. The in 2005 by Finnish historian Erkki study dealt with the diplomatic prelude to Hautamäki, whose research was based World War II, and was based on a secret dossier on documents originating from secret by Marshal C. G. E. Mannerheim. The dossier was transferred to President J. K. Paasikivi dossier S-32 of Finnish Marshal, 1 after the war, and then disappeared from Carl Gustav Emil Mannerheim. The public eye. Fortunately, its main items were documents of the dossier originated either copied or a synopsis was made on the from the two different sources. First, request of the Marshal by his long-time trustee, they represented the documents of Vilho Tahvanaine. On the basis of these copies, Hautamäki was able to propose an entirely new German officials, including a personal view of the diplomatic manoeuvring which led letter by Reichsmarschall Hermann to the outbreak of WW II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground: an Unexamined Context to the Firebombing of Japan
    Volume 16 | Issue 8 | Number 3 | Article ID 5136 | Apr 15, 2018 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground: An Unexamined Context to the Firebombing of Japan Dylan J. Plung Abstract This paper explores a previously unexamined context to the firebombing of Japan. Analysis of the decisions leading up to construction and military testing conducted in 1943 at the Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground in Utah allows important insights into the evolution of US bombing strategy. The shift in US strategy from precision to carpet bombing, the testing and development of incendiary weaponry, and the institutionalization and rationalization of pursuing civilian targets throughout Japan are considered alongside this untold history. Additionally, a broader appreciation of World War II timelines is suggested. Keywords Napalm, firebombing, Dugway Proving Ground, Japanese Village, World War II, precision bombing, civilian bombing, Tokyo air raids. M-69 incendiary tests on Japanese style structures at Dugway Proving Ground. This and all subsequent images are from Standard Oil,Design and Construction of Typical German and Japanese Test Structures at Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah, 1943. Via JapanAirRaids.org "The M69/M69X bomb was designed to lodge in the most flammable part of the building—the ceiling beams." 1 16 | 8 | 3 APJ | JF - U.S. Army Dugway Proving Rhode Island) is unfenced open range filled Ground, Historical Fact Sheet, p. 1 with wildlife, cattle, blind curves, and vision- impeding hillsides. Isolated more than twenty miles beyond the gate of Dugway Proving Ground lies the remains of German-Japanese "Initially, it often seemed a home Village, where replicas of German and Japanese was unaffected, until the windows buildings were constructed, bombed at least 27 began to shine from within and times (see Table 1), and rebuilt in order to test then glowed ‘like a paper lantern’ incendiaries for use in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. FIRE AWAY Toward the End of World War II, the Allied Forces
    4. FIRE AWAY Toward the end of World War II, the Allied Forces shifted tactics from the relatively ineffective high-altitude precision bombing of military targets to low-altitude firebombing of urban areas. This new form of bombing involved dropping a combination of high-explosive bombs to break windows and incendiary bombs to start fires. Over the span of eleven days in the summer of 1943, British and American forces bombed Hamburg, Germany, multiple times in a campaign codenamed “Operation Gomorrah.” During the night of 27 July, a combination of weather conditions and concentrated bombing produced a firestorm that sucked all the oxygen out of the lower atmosphere, produced winds up to 150 mph and temperatures around 1,500ºF, and towered over 1,000 feet into the sky. No one had predicted a firestorm as a possible side-effect of the bombing. Over the course of Operation Gomorrah, the bombing and subsequent firestorm killed over 40,000 people, according an article about the operation in Air Force Magazine, 2007. The Allies conducted a similar campaign against Dresden, Germany, during three days in February 1945, while the German army was retreating from all fronts. Previous bombing raids had been conducted against the railroad classification yards in Dresden, but this campaign targeted the inner city. On the morning of 14 February, the bombing produced a firestorm similar to the one in Hamburg, with temperatures reaching 2,700ºF. German sources have the number of people killed ranging between 25,000 and 35,000. The actual number was probably closer to 45,000, according to an article called “Firebombing (Germany & Japan),” by Conrad C.
    [Show full text]
  • Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War
    The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War PRINTER: strip in FIGURE NUMBER A-1 Shoot at 277% bleed all sides Stephen L. McFarland A Douglas P–70 takes off for a night fighter training mission, silhouetted by the setting Florida sun. 2 The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War Stephen L. McFarland AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM 1998 Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War The author traces the AAF’s development of aerial night fighting, in- cluding technology, training, and tactical operations in the North African, European, Pacific, and Asian theaters of war. In this effort the United States never wanted for recruits in what was, from start to finish, an all-volunteer night fighting force. Cut short the night; use some of it for the day’s business. — Seneca For combatants, a constant in warfare through the ages has been the sanctuary of night, a refuge from the terror of the day’s armed struggle. On the other hand, darkness has offered protection for operations made too dangerous by daylight. Combat has also extended into the twilight as day has seemed to provide too little time for the destruction demanded in modern mass warfare. In World War II the United States Army Air Forces (AAF) flew night- time missions to counter enemy activities under cover of darkness. Allied air forces had established air superiority over the battlefield and behind their own lines, and so Axis air forces had to exploit the night’s protection for their attacks on Allied installations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Bomber Command Cranwellians
    RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL “The Cranwellian Many” A Tribute to Bomber Command Cranwellians Version 1.0 dated 9 November 2020 IBM Steward 6GE In its electronic form, this document contains underlined, hypertext links to additional material, including alternative source data and archived video/audio clips. [To open these links in a separate browser tab and thus not lose your place in this e-document, press control+click (Windows) or command+click (Apple Mac) on the underlined word or image] Bomber Command - the Cranwellian Contribution RAF Bomber Command was formed in 1936 when the RAF was restructured into four Commands, the other three being Fighter, Coastal and Training Commands. At that time, it was a commonly held view that the “bomber will always get through” and without the assistance of radar, yet to be developed, fighters would have insufficient time to assemble a counter attack against bomber raids. In certain quarters, it was postulated that strategic bombing could determine the outcome of a war. The reality was to prove different as reflected by Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Harris - interviewed here by Air Vice-Marshal Professor Tony Mason - at a tremendous cost to Bomber Command aircrew. Bomber Command suffered nearly 57,000 losses during World War II. Of those, our research suggests that 490 Cranwellians (75 flight cadets and 415 SFTS aircrew) were killed in action on Bomber Command ops; their squadron badges are depicted on the last page of this tribute. The totals are based on a thorough analysis of a Roll of Honour issued in the RAF College Journal of 2006, archived flight cadet and SFTS trainee records, the definitive International Bomber Command Centre (IBCC) database and inputs from IBCC historian Dr Robert Owen in “Our Story, Your History”, and the data contained in WR Chorley’s “Bomber Command Losses of the Second World War, Volume 9”.
    [Show full text]