Tourism Sectors- Are the Thermal Mineral Waters Found Bihor County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tourism Sectors- Are the Thermal Mineral Waters Found Bihor County Table of Contents CHAPTER I – DIAGNOSTIC ANALISYS .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION ANALISYS ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. General outline .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2. European, national metropolitan context ............................................................................................... 12 1.2.3. Demography ............................................................................................................................................ 16 1.2.4. Land and housing .................................................................................................................................... 21 1.2.5. Infrastructure and equipment planning .................................................................................................. 26 1.2.6. Public services ......................................................................................................................................... 30 1.2.7. Economic development ........................................................................................................................... 42 1.2.8. The quality of environmental factors and pollution sources ................................................................... 66 1.2.9. Financial capacity of Local Public Administration ................................................................................... 72 1.2.10. Development gaps................................................................................................................................... 74 1.3. PEST ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 81 1.4. PROJECTS FINANCED BY GRANTS ..................................................................................................................... 85 CHAPTER II – DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ........................................................................................................ 93 2.1. DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS AND POLICY OPTIONS ........................................................................................................ 94 2.1.1. General scenarios of socio-economic development ................................................................................... 94 2.1.2. Scenarios for interurban cooperation ........................................................................................................ 96 2.2. CHARTER OF GOOD LOCAL GOVERNANCE .................................................................................................................. 98 2.2.1. Principles of metropolitan cooperation ...................................................................................................... 98 2.2.2. Public policy ................................................................................................................................................ 99 2.2.3. Vision. Mission. Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 102 2.2.4. Sectoral policies and Programmes ........................................................................................................... 104 2.2.5. Project portfolio ....................................................................................................................................... 123 2.2.6. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism for the Implementation of the Development Strategy ............. 137 CHAPTER I CHAPTER I – Diagnostic Analisys 1.1. CONTEXT core priorities for the local authorities, to which a number of consideration can be added, that refer to Oradea Metropolitan Area was founded by the the viability of a major polycentric cross-border association of the Oradea municipality with the position. administrative territorial units surrounding it, namely The development strategy of Oradea Metropolitan Area the local authorities of Biharia, Borş, Cetariu, Nojorid, Oşorhei, Paleu, Sînmartin, Sîntandrei. Therefore the 9 is done within the project “Local development founding members, located on the western border of strategies in Oradea Metropolitan Area” implemented Romania set, through the general’s assembly decision, by the association and co-financed by the European on the 9th of May 2005 the first intercommunity Social Fund through the Regional Operational development Association legally established, in a form Programme for Developing the Administration’s of Metropolitan Area was set in Romania. Capacity, SMIS code 13072. The general objective of the project is to overall improve the capacity of the On the 31st of July 2007, Girişu de Criş local authority local administrations within Oradea Metropolitan Area. adhered to the association thus increasing the number Throughout the implementation process of the project of members to 10 administrative units. Girisu de Cris the persuaded goal is to improve the capacity of local local authority was divided, thus creating Toboliu local authorities to formulate and create public policies and authority, increasing by one the number of members of to update their own local development strategies. the association. The project budget is of 653.100 lei, with an As of the 2nd of June 2010, Oradea Metropolitan Area implementing period of 18 months. The target group of (OMA) has a number of 12 members, the general the project is formed by the employees of each local assembly adopting unanimously the membership of administration forming Oradea Metropolitan Area. The Ineu, giving it full rights amongst the other associates. results of the project focus on (1) training a number of 40 public clerks from each member of OMA and (2) the The common goal of the associates, according to the creation of 12 updated local development strategies constitutive documents, is to stimulate and support the and one document that combines all of them (the growth and prosperity of the area, improvement in life strategy of the Oradea Metropolitan Area), creating and standards among the inhabitants, having as guide the including a Good Governance Charta in these strategic goal to continuously improve the overall quality of life. documents, translating them into English and printing The overall objective underlines the sustainable all the strategic documents. development of the metropolitan territory, envisioning The general objective of the sustainable development the creation of a common urban space of the 9 founding members, following all the necessary strategies is to improve life standards by exploiting the principles for insuring a coagulated territorial cohesion. existing resources and promoting the potential of the The set specific objectives are related to aligning subjected administrative territorial unit. In order to Oradea Metropolitan Area to the Euro-Atlantic reach this objective, a through and realistic analysis of economic and social standards, according to the the current situation must be made within the local national ones, by the alignment of the metropolitan administrative territorial units, the Metropolitan Area as a whole, in correlation to the situations of the Bihor market climate to the international competition procedures, and last but not least to insure the socio- county and the North-West Development Region, thus economic growth of the area. Among the main activity identifying the existing problems, measures needed to direction of the association, key elements such as, be adopted and outlining the strategic profile. promoting a coherent sustainable development strategy, promotion of public policies that support the continuous growth of added value, attracting, facilitating and supporting direct investments that have a major impact on the sustainability of the area, are 6 CHAPTER I – Diagnostic Analisys 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION ANALISYS are documented. For example the first documented mentioning of Nojorid was made in 1229, in a donation document, the Latin name of the settlement being 1.2.1. General outline Villa Irug. Later 2 cores of the village were mentioned, being called Villa Irug Maior (Ieruga Mare) and Villa History. The existence of human communities within Irug Minor (Ieruga Mică). The names the two localities of Oradea Metropolitan Area dates back to settlements were adapted to Hungarian becoming ancient times. For example, humans in Oradea date Ürögy or Uregd Nagy and Kiss Ürögy, then again back to the late Middle Paleolithic (50.000-35.000 BC). adapted to the Romanian language receiving the names In the early twentieth century (1909) in the perimeter of Nojorid and Chişirid. At the same time the of the former Knapp brickery were discovered a deposit settlements of Girişu de Criş were documented since of bones which contained 17 pieces dating from the the XIII – XIV century: Girişu de Criş – 1221, Tărian – Upper Paleolithic period. This discovery convinced the 1341. researchers of the presence of Homo sapiens on the present territory of Oradea. The oldest document that mentions the settlement of Sîntandrei dates from XIII and XIV
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of the Oradea City Development Strategy
    ASSESSMENT OF THE ORADEA CITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY City of Oradea Center for Urban Development Studies ◦Harvard University Research Triangle Institute August, 2001 Assessment of Oradea Development Strategy Executive Summary.........................................................................................................3 Oradea Vision ..................................................................................................................5 Regional Context .............................................................................................................5 Total Population...........................................................................................................5 Location .......................................................................................................................5 Administrative Land Area............................................................................................5 Economy ......................................................................................................................6 Public Institutions and Enterprises...............................................................................7 Development Trends....................................................................................................7 Distinguishing Characteristics and Assets ...................................................................7 City Development Strategy..............................................................................................8 City
    [Show full text]
  • Județul Bihor
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data 23.05.2016SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH constituite pentru alegerile locale din anul 2016úLDLORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD &LUFXPVFULSĠLD(OHFWRUDOă-XGHĠHDQăQU5, BIHOR ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL Colegiul Economic 1 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 1 3UH܈HGLQWH 785&8ù FLORIN FLAVIUS V BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA "Partenie Cosma" Colegiul Economic 2 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 1 /RF܊LLWRU CAPALB DORINA I BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA "Partenie Cosma" ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă 3 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 2 3UH܈HGLQWH BURLACU OVIDIU-BOGDAN G BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA /XFUHĠLD6XFLX ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă 4 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 2 /RF܊LLWRU POP IOAN C BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA /XFUHĠLD6XFLX Liceul Tehnologic Sanitar 5 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 3 3UH܈HGLQWH MANGRA SORINA-CRINA V BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA ³Vasile Voiculescu´ Liceul Tehnologic Sanitar 6 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 3 /RF܊LLWRU 0,+Ă,(ù RAMONA G BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA ³Vasile Voiculescu´ Liceul Tehnologic Sanitar 7 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 4 3UH܈HGLQWH TREMPE-COTUNA SILVIA-ELENA V BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA ³Vasile Voiculescu´ Liceul Tehnologic Sanitar 8 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 4 /RF܊LLWRU =*+,%2/ğ EMIL I BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA ³Vasile Voiculescu´ *UăGLQLĠDFX3URJUDP 9 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 5 3UH܈HGLQWH 02ğ IRINA-ALEXANDRA P BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA Prelungit nr.22 *UăGLQLĠDFX3URJUDP 10 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 5 /RF܊LLWRU GHIRDAN GHIZELA-TÜNDE C BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA Prelungit nr.22 *UăGLQLĠDFX3URJUDP 11 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 6 3UH܈HGLQWH MARA ELENA I BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA Prelungit nr.22 *UăGLQLĠDFX3URJUDP 12 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 6 /RF܊LLWRU BUTIRI VIORICA-VALERIA V BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA Prelungit nr.22 13 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 7 Universitatea Agora 3UH܈HGLQWH STANCIU ANA-MARIETA I BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 14 MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 7 Universitatea Agora /RF܊LLWRU =2ğ9Ă/&$1 BIANCA-ANAMARIA F BIHOR, MUNICIPIUL ORADEA 1/83 39DILúDUHMXGHĠ ,QL܊LDOD Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • EN Comuna Paleu Final .Pdf
    Table of Contents CHAPTER I – DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION ANALISYS .................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. General outline ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Demography ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.3. Land and Housing .................................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.4. Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.5. Public Services ........................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2.6. Economic development .......................................................................................................................... 23 1.2.7. Quality of environmental factors and pollution sources .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Development Opportunities in Oradea
    Orkustofnun, Grensasvegur 9, Reports 2016 IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland Number 14 GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN ORADEA Adrian George Foghiș Oradea Metropolitan Area Piata Unirii 1-3 P.O. Box 410100, Oradea ROMANIA [email protected] ABSTRACT Located in an area of sedimentary basins with low-enthalpy geothermal resources, Oradea city in Romania has a tradition of geothermal research and exploitation. Considering the objectives of the local public administration to develop further the utilization of geothermal resources, the report presents potential geothermal development opportunities in the area. The necessity of a more efficient use of the existing resources and infrastructure is underlined, plus the need for a strategic orientation towards the increase in geothermal exploitation opportunities. Optimization with sustainability as a key goal in the utilization of the geothermal resource in Oradea is of importance, as well as improving air quality by reducing burning of fossil fuels, lowering the heating cost for the population and improving energy safety by increasing usage of a local energy source. This can help Romania to fulfil the 20-20-20 goal of the EU, which can improve the local development of the area. The report presents a proposal of a geothermal road map to 2030, with 3 phases of development at metropolitan level. 1. INTRODUCTION The main topic of the report relates to geothermal development opportunities, as it considers the geothermal resource being one of the most important future inputs for energetic mix independence in the Oradea region. This implies also actions towards a more extensive use of geothermal energy. The general literature review about the benefits of geothermal power and energy shows, that geothermal resources are a cheap form of renewable energy, with many advantages proven over time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Controversial Monk in the Horthyst Hungary
    202 International Journal of Orthodox Theology 9:4 (2018) urn:nbn:de:0276-2018-4073 Alin Cristian Scridon Ghenadie Bogoevici - a controversial Monk in the Horthyst Hungary Abstract The History of the Romanian Ortho- dox Church must be built sequentially on different components. One of these components is the archive. A small piece of an enormous puzzle in the history of the Romanian Church can be found in the person of Ghenadie Bogoevich. The assiduous research of local history offers precious insights about the historc reality of the past, that enables us to get more wise and to avoid preconceptions or negative Rev. Assist Prof. Dr. Dr. clichés. Alin Cristian Scridon, Department of Romanian Studies, Faculty of Letters, Keywords History, and Theology, Hungary, Budapest, Orthodoxy, Ghe- West University of Timi- nadie Bogoevici, Emanuil Gojdu șoara, Romania Ghenadie Bogoevici - a controversial monk in the Horthyst Hungary 203 1 Introduction This study emerged from an intensive research of many bibliographic references with contradictorical information and, of course, several dozens of archive documents. It is worth mentioning that the research of the realities of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Hungary from the interwar period has been in our attention through the elaboration of several studies. Therefore, we assume that this issue is quite appropriated. By analyzing hundreds of archival documents we could disco- vered some tensions. Of course, none of the protagonists have called things by their name, but they have left room for interpretation. Without adherence to a negativist style, we painted Ghenadie Bogoevich’ portrait in grim reality. However, we consider that the subject remains open to debate, in order to set up, apparently, a correct reality of the events that took place almost a century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitolul Xi Episcopia Română Unită De Oradea Episcopul
    CAPITOLUL XI EPISCOPIA ROMÂNĂ UNITĂ DE ORADEA EPISCOPUL AUXILIAR MELETIE COVACI (1748-1770). Prima organizare bisericească, după unirea de la 1700 a românilor greco-catolici din părţile bihorene, a avut loc sub episcopul latin al eparhiei Oradea, Emeric Csáky (1702-1723), care l-a numit pe canonicul său, Vasile Paul, arhidiacon al catolicilor români de rit bizantin, arhidiaconatul numărând 70 de parohii unite.163) Episcopul următor, Nicolae Csáky, pentru prosperitatea credincioşilor săi catolici de rit grec (bizantin), a stăruit pe lângă Sfântul Scaun să-i dea un episcop auxiliar român unit care, în calitate de vicar al său, să păstorească pe credincioşii români. Această dorinţă se va realiza numai sub urmaşul său, episcopul latin Paul Forgách, în 1748, prin numirea de către papa Benedict al XIV-lea a preotului român unit din Diosig, Meletie Covaci, originar din Macedonia, ca episcop titular de Tegea - scaun vacant prin desfiinţare - auxiliar al episcopului latin de Oradea şi vicar al acestuia pentru parohiile române unite. A fost consacrat după ritul bizantin de către episcopul rutean unit al Muncaciului, Emanoil Olsavschi. Românii însă au fost nemulţumiţi cu această formulă de pastoraţie, cum de altfel au fost şi mai înainte, sub arhidiaconatul condus de Vasile Paul. Dar, ceea ce va grăbi schimbarea stării de lucruri, va fi vizitaţia canonică făcută în părţile bihorene de către episcopul ortodox sârb al Aradului, Sineziu Jivanovici, în anul 1753. Acesta, promiţându-le românilor marea cu sarea şi tot felul de privilegii, o mare parte dintre românii uniţi din Bihor s-au lăsat ademeniţi de acest alt "apostol sârb" şi au părăsit unirea.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Sprawl and Residential Development in the Romanian Metropolitan Areas
    URBAN SPRAWL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ROMANIAN METROPOLITAN AREAS INES GRIGORESCU*, BIANCA MITRICĂ**, IRENA MOCANU** , NICOLETA TICANĂ*** Key-words: suburbanization, residential patterns, urban sprawl, metropolitan areas, Romania. In Romania nearly 7,500,000 (34%) inhabitants are living in metropolitan areas. The socio-economic and political changes brought about by the post-communist period have reshaped the metropolitan landscape together with its functional and socio-spatial pattern triggering a wide range of transformations mainly related to urban sprawl process (suburbanization). As one of its major consequences, residential development had caused the deconcentration and the spatial redistribution of the population within metropolitan areas. The paper attempts to analyse the main suburbanization-related residential patterns in connection with their key driving forces (socio-political, demographic, economic, housing) and the associated environmental consequences in the Romanian metropolitan areas in terms of: urban (residential) sprawl, real-estate market dynamics, changes in spatial pattern of population, living floor dynamics, etc., with a special focus on the most significant metropolitan systems: Bucharest, Oradea, Iaşi and Constanţa. The present study will combine GIS computer mapping techniques with housing and demographic data and field surveys to identify the main urban-sprawl-related current residential patterns in the Romanian metropolitan areas and understand causes of change in order to predict how alternative policies will influence future spatial development. INTRODUCTION Over the past years most of European countries have faced the growing challenges of transformations in urban form and development patterns (Patacchini et al. 2009) through suburbanisation and densification processes (ESPON FOCI 2010). The conversion of agricultural and natural ecosystems as well as urban land-use changes have grown to be critical components of global change (Pouyt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisia 2006, XXXVI 1. Doina IGNAT
    Crisia 2006, XXXVI 1. Doina IGNAT, REPREZENTĂRI PLASTICE ANTROPOMORFE DIN AŞEZAREA NEOLITICĂ DE LA SUPLACU DE BARCĂU REPRESENTATIONS PLASTIQUES ANTHROPOMORPHES DU SITE NEOLITHIQUE DE SUPLACU DE BARCĂU (DEP. DE BIHOR) A l’occasion de la reprise des recherches archéologiques dans ce site (campagne de 2002- 2003) on a découvert aussi quelques pièces cultiques, anthropomorphes. Elles peuvent être incluses dans le même contexte avec celles déjà connues et publiées et qui appartiennent au Groupe culturel néolithique Suplacu de Barcău. 2. Ioan CRIŞAN, Călin GHEMIŞ, DESCOPERIRI IZOLATE APARŢINÂND EPOCII BRONZULUI DE PE RAZA LOCALITĂŢII CEFA (JUDEŢUL BIHOR) ISOLATED BRONZE AGE DISCOVERIES FROM CEFA (Bihor County) The authors presents two pieces belonging to the Bronze Age. The first one is an little mug, dated in the second stage of Otomani Culture with analogies at Ateas, Sacuieni and others settlements belonging to this culture.The second piece is an bronze knife with analogies in the late Bronze Age deposits.Both pieces were discovered isolate without clear conditions of finding or archaeological contexts but both of them proved the existence here of some settlements. 3. Corina TOMA, REPERTORIUL DESCOPERIRILOR DE EPOCĂ DACICĂ DIN JUDEŢUL BIHOR ŞI POSIBILITĂŢILE DE ABORDARE A UNOR SITUAŢII DE ANALIZAT A CATALOGUE OF THE DACIAN PERIOD DISCOVERIES FOUND IN THE BIHOR COUNTY AREA – POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO SPECIFIC SITUATIONS The present paper gathers information published along the years regarding Dacian period archaeological and numismatic discoveries found in the present area of Bihor County. The organization of these discoveries in a catalogue allows for some historical and archaeological observations: taking into account the stage of the archaeological research and the relief of the county (large surfaces covered with forests and swamps), the discoveries are concentrated on the Western side of the Crisana Hills and in the Crisurilor Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.70.1.1Oşlobanu, C. and Alexe,Hungarian M. Hungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 70 70 2021 (2021) (1) (1) 3–18. 3–183 Built-up area analysis using Sentinel data in metropolitan areas of Transylvania, Romania Constantin OŞLOBANU and Mircea ALEXE1 Abstract The anthropic and natural elements have become more closely monitored and analysed through the use of remote sensing and GIS applications. In this regard, the study aims to feature a different approach to produce more and more thematic information, focusing on the development of built-up areas. In this paper, multispec- tral images and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images were the basis of a wide range of proximity analyses. These allow the extraction of data about the distribution of built-up space on the areas with potential for economic and social development. Application of interferometric coherence and supervised classifications have been accomplished on various territories, such as metropolitan areas of the most developed region of Romania, more specifically Transylvania. The results indicate accuracy values, which can reach 94 per cent for multispectral datasets and 93 per cent for SAR datasets. The accuracy of resulted data will reveal a variety of city patterns, depending mainly on local features regarding natural and administrative environments. In this way, a comparison will be made between the accuracy of both datasets to provide an analysis of the manner of built-up areas distribution to assess the expansion of the studied metropolitan areas. Therefore, this study aims to apply well-established methods from the remote sensing field to enhance the information and datasets in some areas lacking recent research.
    [Show full text]
  • Oradea Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan
    STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PLAN FOR ORADEA CITY in the project SEE/B/0004/3.1/X "ATTRACTIVE URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT FOR ACCESIBLE CITIES" acronym ATTAC, SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION PROGRAMM 2007-2013 BENEFICIARY: SC OTL SA CONTRACT: no. 12044/2012 NOVEMBER 2013 1 CONTRACT: no. 12044/2012 - „Study and implementation of sustainable urban transport plan for Oradea city” BENEFICIARY: SC OTL SA SIGNATURES SC Research Transport Institute - INCERTRANS SA SC INCERTRANS SA GENERAL MANAGER: eng. George Daniel COSTACHE CDI TECHNICAL MANAGER: eng. Gheorghe DINU CONTRACT RESPONSIBLES: eng. Luigino SZECSY prof. Pd. D. eng. Florian GHIONEA 2 Cuprins 1. An analysis based on historical data, but developed through mathematical models of prediction, which to confirm or refute SC OTL SA fears regarding negative aspects exacerbating of transport phenomena in municipal area ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Oradea rank setting in the sustainability hierarchy compared with other cities in Romania. ........................... 7 3. National/regional impact framework assessment on issues having major influence on Oradea’s mobility: The list of consequences with positive impact on SUMP (the list resulting from national or local framework) ... 9 4. Comparison of the current state of mobility – FOLLOWING A CERTAIN TYPE OF PLANNING – with the situation revealed by needs for transport services ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Incidenţa Cumulată a Cazurilor De SARS-COV-2 În Jud. Bihor, Pe UAT, În Ultimele 2 Săptămâni
    Incidenţa cumulată a cazurilor de SARS-COV-2 în jud. Bihor, pe UAT, în ultimele 2 săptămâni Dist.to Dist.to Incidenta la Threshold Threshold Threshold Populatia Categorie UAT Pozitivi 1000 locuitori 1‰ 1.5‰ 3‰ Alerte Alerte scoli 3.071 Comuna SALACEA 32 10,42‰ 4 -27 -22 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 10.717 Oras VALEA LUI MIHAI 79 7,37‰ 11 -62 -46 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 3.939 Comuna CURTUISENI 21 5,33‰ 4 -15 -9 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 3.944 Comuna SIMIAN 20 5,07‰ 4 -14 -8 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 2.068 Comuna BUDUSLAU 8 3,87‰ 3 -4 -1 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 7.982 Comuna SANTANDREI 30 3,76‰ 8 -18 -6 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 1.222 Comuna SPINUS 4 3,27‰ 2 -2 0 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 3.059 Comuna SUNCUIUS 10 3,27‰ 4 -5 0 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 2.149 Comuna CETARIU 7 3,26‰ 3 -3 0 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 225.398 Municipiu ORADEA 709 3,15‰ 226 -370 -32 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 2.232 Comuna COPACEL 7 3,14‰ 3 -3 0 ALERTA 3‰! ALERTA 3‰! 2.459 Comuna DERNA 7 2,85‰ 3 -3 1 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 7.262 Comuna DIOSIG 20 2,75‰ 8 -9 2 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 4.445 Comuna BORS 12 2,70‰ 5 -5 2 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 1.937 Comuna VARCIOROG 4 2,07‰ 2 -1 2 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 17.523 Municipiu MARGHITA 36 2,05‰ 18 -9 17 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 3.487 Comuna AVRAM IANCU 7 2,01‰ 4 -1 4 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 2.058 Comuna SACADAT 4 1,94‰ 3 0 3 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 12.710 Comuna SANMARTIN 24 1,89‰ 13 -4 15 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 2.675 Comuna TARCEA 5 1,87‰ 3 0 4 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 18.901 Municipiu SALONTA 35 1,85‰ 19 -6 22 ALERTA 1.5‰! ALERTA 1‰! 2.714 Comuna LUNCA 5 1,84‰
    [Show full text]
  • Istoriografia Episcopiei Unite a Lugojului
    103 ISTORIOGRAFIA EPISCOPIEI UNITE A LUGOJULUI LUMINIŢA WALLNER-BĂRBULESCU Inten'sul faţă de Episcopia Unită a Lugojului se circumscrie revirimentului istoriografic românesc actual în materie de istorie confesională şi ecleziastică, 1 în special a celei referitoare la Biserica greco-catolică , considerată, de cele mai multe ori de pe poziţii ortodoxe, drept factor al dezbinării naţionale", i<_lr la polul opus de către clericii maghiari, un "cal troian in Cw·ia Romană"i. Pornind de la ideea că problema unirii bisericeşti în Banat constituie un subiect particular al Unirii cu Biserica Romei, reflectarea istoriografică nu poate fi sustrasă unei analize legate de condiţiile generale ale provinciei la finele secolului al XVIII-iea şi prima jumătate a celui următor, care fixează cadrul apariţiei greco-catolicismului bănăţean şi nici consideraţiilor privitoare la poziţia papalităţii, interesată după revoluţia de la 1848 să reorganizeze viaţa ecleziastică în Imperiu, iar ulterior să recupereze întârzierea înregistrată ele Biserică faţă de problemele politice ridicate de statul modern. Cauzalitatea ca şi timpul istoric, în care se produce, sunt cu totul diferite faţă de Transilvania secolelor XVII şi XVIII. Dacă în secolul al XVIII-iea, pe fondul resentimentului populaţiei româneşti faţă de ocupaţia habsburgică, asistăm la o solidaritate ortodoxă româno• sârbă, în temeiul privilegiilor ilire care, asociată lipsei unui interes special al Coroanei în plan confesional (expansiunea catolicismului unificator fiind rezolvată prin colonizare J, fac aproape imposibilă propagarea unirii în Banat (ierarhii sârbi erijându-se în apărători ai ortodoxiei), începând cu secolul următor solidaritatea de circumstanţă, grefată pe alteritatea etnică se destramă m contextul general al afirmării identităţii naţionale. Asistăm la o dispută lJ Vezi, Ioan M.
    [Show full text]