DOCSLIB.ORG

Oradea Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oradea Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PLAN FOR ORADEA CITY in the project SEE/B/0004/3.1/X "ATTRACTIVE URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT FOR ACCESIBLE CITIES" acronym ATTAC, SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION PROGRAMM 2007-2013 BENEFICIARY: SC OTL SA CONTRACT: no. 12044/2012 NOVEMBER 2013 1 CONTRACT: no. 12044/2012 - „Study and implementation of sustainable urban transport plan for Oradea city” BENEFICIARY: SC OTL SA SIGNATURES SC Research Transport Institute - INCERTRANS SA SC INCERTRANS SA GENERAL MANAGER: eng. George Daniel COSTACHE CDI TECHNICAL MANAGER: eng. Gheorghe DINU CONTRACT RESPONSIBLES: eng. Luigino SZECSY prof. Pd. D. eng. Florian GHIONEA 2 Cuprins 1. An analysis based on historical data, but developed through mathematical models of prediction, which to confirm or refute SC OTL SA fears regarding negative aspects exacerbating of transport phenomena in municipal area ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Oradea rank setting in the sustainability hierarchy compared with other cities in Romania. ........................... 7 3. National/regional impact framework assessment on issues having major influence on Oradea’s mobility: The list of consequences with positive impact on SUMP (the list resulting from national or local framework) ... 9 4. Comparison of the current state of mobility – FOLLOWING A CERTAIN TYPE OF PLANNING – with the situation revealed by needs for transport services ............................................................................................ 19 5. SWOT analysis of local framework ................................................................................................................ 29 6. Customize the planning process at Oradea local level .................................................................................. 31 7. The SUMP development chronology ............................................................................................................ 34 8. Identifying the most suitable areas for developing a SUMP .......................................................................... 37 9. Proposal on urban policy in accordance with sustainable development principles ....................................... 41 10. Prioritization of the options considered appropriate (after analysis conducted by the working groups) ...... 43 11. The possible instruments for materialisation of changes ............................................................................. 45 12. Identifying factors whose participation could better influence the development of a SUMP ....................... 48 13. The portofolio of teams involved in SUMP development ............................................................................. 50 14. Ensuring transparency and interactivity (communication plan) ................................................................... 57 15. The selection of relevant indicators ............................................................................................................. 60 16. Qualitative and quantitative development of the 4 compulsory scenarios (“do nothing, “as before”, “of minimalist alternative policy”, “of engaging alternative policy”) .......................................................................... 65 17. The vision of the Oradea’s mobility .............................................................................................................. 78 18. Objectives .................................................................................................................................................... 86 19. SMART targets ............................................................................................................................................. 88 20. Options with possible measures .................................................................................................................. 98 21. Develop the packages of measure based on the principle – value for the invested money (best value for money) ............................................................................................................................................................. 117 22. Develop the packages of measures from the perspective of attainable SYNERGY between the components of packages ................................................................................................................................. 120 23. AGREE ON CLEAR RESPONSABILITIES AND ALLOCATE FUNDING ................................................. 127 24. Prepare an action and budget plan ............................................................................................................ 149 25. The selection of proper indicators .............................................................................................................. 168 26. Action plan ................................................................................................................................................. 172 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................................................. 210 Annexes Annex 0 – The graph of streets Annex 14 – Common boarding-unboarding points Annex 22 – Dissemination papers Annex 23 – Measures matrix Annex 24 - Report Annex 25 – Revised measures matrix Annex 26 - Proposed measures framing in Konsult program Annex 27 - Packages of efficient measures Annex 28 – Measures evaluation by Konsult program Annex 29 – Measures efficiency Aneex 31 – The effectiveness of the final set of measures 3 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN ORADEA Considering 2009 European Parliament Resolution concerning Action Plan on Urban Mobility (code 2008/2217-INI-2010/C 184 E/09) And Provisions contained in: 2007 Commission Green Paper „Towards a new culture for urban mobility”, and Resolution of 9 July 2008 on the same issues, 1988 Resolution concerning pedestrian’s protection and European Paper of pedestrian’s rights, 2001 Commission White Paper entitled „European policy for transport for 2010: Time to decide”, 2006 Commission Communication entitled „Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment”, 2007 Commission Communication entitled „Towards Europe-wide Safer, Cleaner and Efficient”, European Parliament and Council Directive on clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles, 2008 resolution on 2008 Spring European Council regarding Lisbon Strategy, Directive 2008/50/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, 2009 Committee of the Regions Notice on Action Plan on Urban Mobility, SUMP development is possible if urban transport aspects are analyzed in the following circumstances: I. From the strategic point of view it is necessary to adjust the main recommendations of sustainable development (as they were stated in Rio Declaration on environment and development) to urban reality: 1st Recommendation: The people are in the center of urban mobility concerns. The citizens have the right to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature. 2nd Recommendation: Cities have the right to exploit and organize their own material resources according to their environment and development policies, only if the activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the local environment or to the areas in close proximity. 4 3rd Recommendation: The right to development must be accomplished so as to meet developmental and environmental needs of the present and future generations. 4th Recommendation: To achieve sustainable development environmental protection shall constitute as a part of development process and can not be considered apart of this. 5th Recommendation: All central and legal institutions should cooperate in order to eradicate poverty as essential requirement of sustainable development to reduce disparities between standards of living and to better meet the needs of most people. 6th Recommendation: Priority must be given to special situation and disadvantaged local areas needs of the cities. Actions related to environment and development should address to interests and needs of all the citizens. 7th Recommendation: To achieve sustainable development and a better quality of life for all the citizens, urban local administrations should reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption and to promote appropriate demographic policies. 8th Recommendation: Local authorities have to promote the internalization of environmental costs and economical instruments use, considering the approach according to which the polluter should bear the cost of pollution. 9th Recommendation: Environmental issues are best handled with the participations of all citizens at the relevant level. For this, each individual shall have appropriate access to information held by public authority, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities and each individual shall have the opportunity to participate in decision making. Leadership at all levels should facilitate and encourage public awareness and participation making information available at the widest level. 10th Recommendation: Both sexes participation in all activities concerning urban development is essential for harmonious sustainable development. 11th Recommendation: Young people involvement should be an objective of local
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Local Development in Romania in the Opportunity of Creating Jobs
    European Journal of Sustainable Development (2020), 9, 3, 287-304 ISSN: 2239-5938 Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p287 Sustainable Local Development in Romania in the Opportunity of Creating Jobs By Florina Bran1, Ghenadie Ciobanu2, Maria Loredana Popescu3, Petrut Cristian Vasilache4 Abstract The economic, social transformations of the last three decades of evolution of rural development both in Romania and in general in rural areas in the context of globalization have radically changed the vision, thinking and attitude of the rural population. As a result, it has led to a massive migration of population to other developed countries. This phenomenon is also characteristic for Romania. At the same time, the technological development has a massive impact on the process of organizing the society and the evolution of the society, both the evolution of biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, branches in the field of chemistry, biochemistry and digitization, which have impact on the development or underdevelopment of the areas in poverty and underdevelopment. economic, but at the same time they will be able to make an essential contribution to the local rural development and to the creation of new job opportunities for both young people and specialists from different branches, as well as for vulnerable groups of population from the rural area. In this article we aim to address these issues and come up with certain solutions and proposals. Keywords: Sustainable local development, rural areas, technological development, digitization 1. Introduction The objectives of the „EU sustainable development strategy including an environmental dimension (Rădulescu et al., 2018). This recognizes that in the long term, economic growth, social cohesion and environmental protection must go hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Oradea City Development Strategy
    ASSESSMENT OF THE ORADEA CITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY City of Oradea Center for Urban Development Studies ◦Harvard University Research Triangle Institute August, 2001 Assessment of Oradea Development Strategy Executive Summary.........................................................................................................3 Oradea Vision ..................................................................................................................5 Regional Context .............................................................................................................5 Total Population...........................................................................................................5 Location .......................................................................................................................5 Administrative Land Area............................................................................................5 Economy ......................................................................................................................6 Public Institutions and Enterprises...............................................................................7 Development Trends....................................................................................................7 Distinguishing Characteristics and Assets ...................................................................7 City Development Strategy..............................................................................................8 City
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Romania 2020
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.2.2020 SWD(2020) 522 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Romania 2020 Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2020 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 {COM(2020) 150 final} EN EN CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1. Economic situation and outlook 9 2. Progress with country-specific recommendations 17 3. Summary of the main findings from the MIP in-depth review 21 4. Reform priorities 25 4.1. Public finances and taxation 25 4.2. Financial sector 30 4.3. Labour market, education and social policies 33 4.4. Competitiveness, reforms and investment 45 4.5. Environmental Sustainability 63 Annex A: Overview Table 67 Annex B: Commission debt sustainability analysis and fiscal risks 75 Annex C: Standard Tables 76 Annex D: Investment guidance on Just Transition Fund 2021-2027 for Romania 82 Annex E: Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 85 References 90 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Key economic and financial indicators 16 Table 2.1: Assessment of 2019 CSR implementation 19 Table 3.1: MIP assessment matrix (*) - Romania 2020 23 Table C.1: Financial market indicators 76 Table C.2: Headline Social Scoreboard indicators 77 Table C.3: Labour market and education indicators 78 Table C.4: Social inclusion and health
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Sectors- Are the Thermal Mineral Waters Found Bihor County
    Table of Contents CHAPTER I – DIAGNOSTIC ANALISYS .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION ANALISYS ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. General outline .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2. European, national metropolitan context ............................................................................................... 12 1.2.3. Demography ............................................................................................................................................ 16 1.2.4. Land and housing .................................................................................................................................... 21 1.2.5. Infrastructure and equipment planning .................................................................................................. 26 1.2.6. Public services ......................................................................................................................................... 30 1.2.7. Economic development ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EN Comuna Paleu Final .Pdf
    Table of Contents CHAPTER I – DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION ANALISYS .................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. General outline ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Demography ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.3. Land and Housing .................................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.4. Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.5. Public Services ........................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2.6. Economic development .......................................................................................................................... 23 1.2.7. Quality of environmental factors and pollution sources .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Outline of the Study
    PART 1 OUTLINE OF THE STUDY The Study on Mater Plan for Hazardous Waste Management in Romania Final Report Japan International Cooperation Agency Volume 5 Summary PART 1 OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 1. Study Background Japan International Cooperation Agency decided to conduct the Study on “Master Plan for Hazardous Waste Management in Romania” in response to the request of the Government of Romania. In 2001, JICA conducted a baseline study using Environmental Resources Management (ERM), a UK consulting firm. In November 2001, JICA and the Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection (MWEP) of Romania have signed the Scope of Work and Minutes of Meeting for the Study. In February 2002, JICA commenced the Study by forming a JICA Study Team comprising of two Japanese consulting firms. In general, Romanian hazardous waste management is poor and backward. Main problems include: 1) Low level of awareness on the part of citizens and industry about possible impacts of hazardous waste on health and environment. 2) There are almost no treatment and disposal facilities dedicated for hazardous waste. 3) Low level of application of industrial pollution prevention, control (IPPC) and cleaner production (CP). 4) Low level of the government capacity for law enforcement and poor information system 5) Lack of steady and reliable implementation plan of EU directives in spite of vigorous transposition of the directives. 6) Difficulty for industrial enterprises to acquire funds for industrial and environmental upgrading. 2. Study Objective The Study Objective is: • To strengthen hazardous waste management system in Romania at both governmental and private sector levels. Major focuses of the Study is: • To strengthen the government organizations, as well as to strengthen the awareness of the private sectors that generates hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Document About Romania
    About Romania Romania (Romanian: România, IPA: [ro.mɨni.a]) is a country in Southeastern Europe sited in a historic region that dates back to antiquity. It shares border with Hungary and Serbia to the west, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova to the northeast, and Bulgaria to the south. Romania has a stretch of sea coast along the Black Sea. It is located roughly in the lower basin of the Danube and almost all of the Danube Delta is located within its territory. Romania is a parliamentary unitary state. As a nation-state, the country was formed by the merging of Moldavia and Wallachia in 1859 and it gained recognition of its independence in 1878. Later, in 1918, they were joined by Transylvania, Bukovina and Bessarabia. At the end of World War II, parts of its territories (roughly the present day Moldova) were occupied by USSR and Romania became a member of Warsaw Pact. With the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, Romania started a series of political and economic reforms that peaked with Romania joining the European Union. Romania has been a member of the European Union since January 1, 2007, and has the ninth largest territory in the EU and with 22 million people [1] it has the 7th largest population among the EU member states. Its capital and largest city is Bucharest (Romanian: Bucureşti /bu.kureʃtʲ/ (help·info)), the sixth largest city in the EU with almost 2 million people. In 2007, Sibiu, a large city in Transylvania, was chosen as European Capital of Culture.[2] Romania joined NATO on March 29, 2004, and is also a member of the Latin Union, of the Francophonie and of OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Development Opportunities in Oradea
    Orkustofnun, Grensasvegur 9, Reports 2016 IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland Number 14 GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN ORADEA Adrian George Foghiș Oradea Metropolitan Area Piata Unirii 1-3 P.O. Box 410100, Oradea ROMANIA [email protected] ABSTRACT Located in an area of sedimentary basins with low-enthalpy geothermal resources, Oradea city in Romania has a tradition of geothermal research and exploitation. Considering the objectives of the local public administration to develop further the utilization of geothermal resources, the report presents potential geothermal development opportunities in the area. The necessity of a more efficient use of the existing resources and infrastructure is underlined, plus the need for a strategic orientation towards the increase in geothermal exploitation opportunities. Optimization with sustainability as a key goal in the utilization of the geothermal resource in Oradea is of importance, as well as improving air quality by reducing burning of fossil fuels, lowering the heating cost for the population and improving energy safety by increasing usage of a local energy source. This can help Romania to fulfil the 20-20-20 goal of the EU, which can improve the local development of the area. The report presents a proposal of a geothermal road map to 2030, with 3 phases of development at metropolitan level. 1. INTRODUCTION The main topic of the report relates to geothermal development opportunities, as it considers the geothermal resource being one of the most important future inputs for energetic mix independence in the Oradea region. This implies also actions towards a more extensive use of geothermal energy. The general literature review about the benefits of geothermal power and energy shows, that geothermal resources are a cheap form of renewable energy, with many advantages proven over time.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Leeds SEG Student Chapter Table of Contents
    University of Leeds SEG Student Chapter International Field Trip to Romania 9th – 15th June 2019 Gold dendrites exposed at the Romanian National Gold Museum from Brad Subject of the Stewart R. Wallace Grant awarded by the Society of Economic Geologists Table of Contents I. Acknowledgement ………………………………………………………………….1 II. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………2 III. List of Participants ………………………………………………………………….3 IV. Itinerary …………………………………………………………………………………3 V. Cost Breakdown …………………………………………………………………..15 I. Acknowledgements We would like to start this report by showing our gratitude to the Society of Economic Geologists for awarding our chapter with the Stewart R. Wallace Grant. The grant was used to cover the local transport in Romania, the accommodation for the last night of the trip and local entrance fees, thus, reducing significantly the overall cost of the trip for the students involved. We would also like to show our recognition and respects to our Romanian collaborators, Belevion (geological, geophysical & mining consulting company) and Samax Romania (mining company). We extend a special thank you to Filip Onescu (chief geophysicist, Belevion), Mircea Negulici (Senior Geologist, Belevion), Dr. Soring Halga (General Director, Samax), Albert Fuer (Senior Exploration Geologist, Samax) and Peterfi Sandor (Project Geologist, Samax) for taking time out of their busy schedules to show us their work and to teach us about geophysical and geological techniques used in the exploration for porphyry style mineralisation. 1 II. Introduction From the 9th to 15th of June 2019, the University of Leeds SEG Student Chapter visited the Apuseni Mountains of Romania (Fig.1 A &) on a geological field trip. The main aim of the trip was to provide the participants with education in porphyry Mo-Cu and Cu-Au mineralization types and their distinguishing mineralogy in the Apuseni Mountains and in the Banatitic Magmatic and Metallogenetic Belt of Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage of Development of Transport Services in Romania Compared to European Union
    Advances in Fiscal, Political and Law Science Stage of Development of Transport Services in Romania Compared to European Union CECILIA-IRINA RABONTU Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Constantin Brancusi” University of TarguJiu Address: Victoria Steet, no.24, TarguJiu, Gorj County, ROMANIA [email protected] ANA-GABRIELA BABUCEA Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Constantin Brancusi” University of TarguJiu Address: Victoria Steet, no.24, TarguJiu, Gorj County, ROMANIA [email protected] Abstract: Transportation represents an economic activity side of human society, organized to prevail distances. It is an integral part of the tertiary sector and is individualized, trade and tourism with significant percentages in achieving service indicators. Some specialists say that transportation is not an end in itself but only middle and a way to achieve a wide range of practical purposes. To highlight the role and importance of transport can be done by analysing their relationships with various economic, social and political needs of activity of society members. We have proposed in this paper to analyse economic relationships and to establish the level of development of transport services in Romania within the European Union. This paper intends, and in our opinion succeeds, to address the ample issue of transport services, level of development, providing a comprehensive picture, coherent, logically structured on elements that give it specific and individualized it as an economic sector. Key-Words: - transportation, goods, passengers, Romania, comparison, European Union 1 Introduction to moving in space for various reasons and bringing The role of the transportation services for the products in the most remote places, tourism, intermediate or final consumption brings forward travel to work, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Sprawl and Residential Development in the Romanian Metropolitan Areas
    URBAN SPRAWL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ROMANIAN METROPOLITAN AREAS INES GRIGORESCU*, BIANCA MITRICĂ**, IRENA MOCANU** , NICOLETA TICANĂ*** Key-words: suburbanization, residential patterns, urban sprawl, metropolitan areas, Romania. In Romania nearly 7,500,000 (34%) inhabitants are living in metropolitan areas. The socio-economic and political changes brought about by the post-communist period have reshaped the metropolitan landscape together with its functional and socio-spatial pattern triggering a wide range of transformations mainly related to urban sprawl process (suburbanization). As one of its major consequences, residential development had caused the deconcentration and the spatial redistribution of the population within metropolitan areas. The paper attempts to analyse the main suburbanization-related residential patterns in connection with their key driving forces (socio-political, demographic, economic, housing) and the associated environmental consequences in the Romanian metropolitan areas in terms of: urban (residential) sprawl, real-estate market dynamics, changes in spatial pattern of population, living floor dynamics, etc., with a special focus on the most significant metropolitan systems: Bucharest, Oradea, Iaşi and Constanţa. The present study will combine GIS computer mapping techniques with housing and demographic data and field surveys to identify the main urban-sprawl-related current residential patterns in the Romanian metropolitan areas and understand causes of change in order to predict how alternative policies will influence future spatial development. INTRODUCTION Over the past years most of European countries have faced the growing challenges of transformations in urban form and development patterns (Patacchini et al. 2009) through suburbanisation and densification processes (ESPON FOCI 2010). The conversion of agricultural and natural ecosystems as well as urban land-use changes have grown to be critical components of global change (Pouyt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 2676a-RO Public Disclosure Authorized STAFF APPRAISALREPORT DANUBE-BLACKSEA CANALPROJECT ROMANIA Public Disclosure Authorized December 20, 1979 Public Disclosure Authorized Projects Department Europe, Middle East and North Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Currency Unit: Leu (plural lei) 1. Official Rate Lei 4.47 = US$1.00 Leu 1.00 = US$0.22 2. Tourist Rate Lei 12.00 = US$1.00 Leu 1.00 = US$0.08 3. Conversion Rate for Traded Goods Lei 18.00 - US$1.00 Leu 1.00 = US$0.06 The Official Exchange Rate of lei 4.47 per US$1 is used only for accounting purposes. The rate used for tourist transactions is lei 12 per US$1, having been revalued from a rate of lei 14.38 per US$1 in October 1974. Beginning in March 1978 a trading rate of lei 18 per US$1 has been used to convert the priceq of all traded goods; this rate is considered representative of the average cost of convertible foreign exchange. WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 meter (m) = 3.2808 feet (ft) 1 kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile (mi) 1 square kilometer (km2) = 0.3861 square mile (mi2) 1 hectare (ha) = 2.47105 acres (ac) 1 liter (1) = 0.2642 gallon (gal) 1 liter per second (1/sec) = 0.0353 cubic foot per second (ft3/sec) 1 cubic meter per second (m3/sec) (m3/sec) = 35.3147 cubic feet per second (ft3/sec) 1 kilowatt
    [Show full text]