Paolo Stellino

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paolo Stellino Philosophical Perspectives on Suicide Paolo Stellino Philosophical Perspectives on Suicide Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein Paolo Stellino Nova Institute of Philosophy Universidade Nova de Lisboa LISBOA, Portugal ISBN 978-3-030-53936-8 ISBN 978-3-030-53937-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53937-5 © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Tis work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Te use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Te publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Te publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afliations. Tis Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Te registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface According to Baruch Spinoza, “a free person thinks about death less than anything, and his wisdom is a meditation not on death but on life” (Ethics, IV, 67). Writing a book on the philosophy of suicide does not necessarily mean to meditate on death. Tis is what I tried to explain— often with no success—to all those friends and colleagues that in recent years kept asking me why I had chosen to work on such a gloomy subject. Of course, I could have reminded them of Camus’ well-known opening words of Te Myth of Sisyphus: “Tere is but one truly serious philosophi- cal problem and that is suicide.” But the fact is that whereas I am not persuaded by Camus’ claim, I am truly convinced that meditating on suicide means, to a great extent, meditating on fundamental questions that directly concern life, not death. Among others, these questions are: How do we conceive our obligations to society, friends, and family? Which is the set of moral values according to which we choose to orien- tate our life? Which is the value that we give to our autonomy and free- dom? Is this value non-negotiable? And how do we conceive dignity? Is it a “property” that, in specifc situations, can be undermined or deteriorated? I began to take interest in these questions almost ffteen years ago when, almost accidentally, I attended a session of the seminar of the Bioethics Research Group of the University of Valencia. At the time, I was still a PhD student and the subject of my dissertation (on Nietzsche v vi Preface and Dostoevsky) had little to do with bioethics. Juan Carlos Siurana Aparisi, the director of the research group, drew my attention to the fact that Nietzsche’s stance on suicide was almost unexplored by bioethicists. I began looking for Nietzsche’s remarks on suicide in his writings and posthumous fragments. What struck me immediately was Nietzsche’s joyous and almost poetical conception of free death. Te possibility of conceiving death diferently, that is, as a festival was something new for me. I left Spain in 2010. At the time, I had two main concerns: to fnd a post-doc position and to work on the English translation of my disserta- tion. I temporarily set aside my interest on the topic of suicide and devoted myself completely to Nietzsche and Dostoevsky. It was an inter- national conference on Kant and Nietzsche, held in 2012 in Lisbon, that gave me the occasion to work again on the philosophy of suicide. From that moment, suicide has been, somewhat intermittently, one of my main topics of research. Te idea of writing this book occurred to me some years later, when I noticed that there was a fl rouge that linked Kant’s, Schopenhauer’s, Nietzsche’s, and Wittgenstein’s views of suicide. I will motivate my choice to place these four philosophical perspectives on sui- cide side by side in the Introduction, so that there is no need to dwell on it here. Some chapters of this book are based on material previously published in P. Stellino, “Nietzsche on Suicide”, Nietzsche-Studien, 42 (2013): 151–177, and in P. Stellino, “Kant and Nietzsche on Suicide”, Philosophical Inquiry, 39/2 (2015): 79–104. Although in both cases I heavily reworked their content for this book, I would like to thank both journals for per- mission to revise and reuse these publications. My research particularly benefted from the works of three specialists on the philosophy of suicide: Margaret P. Battin, Héctor Wittwer, and Michael Cholbi. Wittwer’s book Selbsttötung als philosophisches Problem: Über die Rationalität und Moralität des Suizids particularly helped me at the initial stage of my research to understand the complexities of the dif- ferent arguments that are put forward in the debate concerning the ratio- nality and morality of suicide. Lisbon Paolo Stellino 23 April 2020 Acknowledgements I owe a great debt to the following friends and colleagues who read single chapters of this book and provided me with extremely valuable feedback: Roberta Pasquarè and Lorena Cebolla Sanahuja (chapter on Kant), Christopher Janaway and Vilmar Debona (chapter on Schopenhauer), Marta Faustino and Maria Cristina Fornari (chapter on Nietzsche), and Vicente Sanfélix Vidarte and Modesto Gómez Alonso (chapter on Wittgenstein). I am also most grateful to the anonymous reviewer for providing very useful critical and constructive comments on the entire manuscript. I would like to thank Brendan George and Lauriane Piette, from Palgrave Macmillan, and Charanya Manoharan, from Springer, for their help and support. I would also like to thank João Constâncio for kindly supporting my work since the frst day I arrived in Lisbon. I should also mention that this book would not have been possible without the sup- port of the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT). A part of this book was written during my stay in Montpellier. I would like to thank Pascal Nouvel for welcoming me at the Centre d’Éthique Contemporaine. A special thought goes to Nadia El Eter and Guillaume Bagnolini, who shared with me the daily routine at the Centre. A word of gratitude goes to all the friends who, inside and outside academia, near and far, have accompanied me during this journey. I can- not help mentioning Maria Cristina Fornari, Luca Lupo, and Pietro vii viii Acknowledgements Gori. In particular, I shared with Pietro all the ups and downs of the academic life as well as the experience of building a new life in a new country with our respective families. Finally, I am deeply thankful to my family for their constant support, and to Audrey for her love and for sharing her life with me (despite the fact that I am a philosopher). E lucevan le stelle… Contents 1 Introduction: Bringing Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein Together 1 References 9 2 Immanuel Kant: The Moral Duty of Self- Preservation 11 2.1 Contextualizing Kant’s Prohibition of Suicide 11 2.2 Arguments from the Lectures on Ethics 23 2.3 Arguments from the Published Writings 40 2.4 Concluding Remarks 64 References 66 3 Arthur Schopenhauer: The Metaphysical Futility of Suicide 71 3.1 Schopenhauer’s Critique of Religious and Philosophical Arguments against Suicide 78 3.2 Schopenhauer’s Metaphysical Worldview 90 3.3 Te Futility of Suicide 100 3.4 Concluding Remarks 117 References 118 ix x Contents 4 Friedrich Nietzsche: A Free Death at the Right Time 123 4.1 Voluntary versus Involuntary Death 131 4.2 Free Death and Quick Death 143 4.3 Meaninglessness and Suicide 155 4.4 Concluding Remarks 173 References 174 5 Ludwig Wittgenstein: Suicide as the Elementary Sin 179 5.1 Te Sources 189 5.2 Wittgenstein’s View of Ethics 199 5.3 Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Suicide 208 5.4 Concluding Remarks 221 References 223 6 Conclusion: What Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein Can Teach Us About Suicide 227 References 240 Index 243 About the author Paolo Stellino is Researcher at the Nova Institute of Philosophy, New University of Lisbon, Portugal. His main felds of research interest are the history of nineteenth- and twentieth-century philosophy, ethics, and phi- losophy of cinema. He has published many articles in international peer- reviewed journals and has authored several book chapters. He is the author of the book Nietzsche and Dostoevsky: On the Verge of Nihilism (2015). xi Abbreviations Kant References to Kant’s writings are cited according to the volume and page number of the Academy Edition (Kants gesammelte Schriften). A Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View CPR Critique of Pure Reason [1781 cited as A/1787 cited as B] CPrR Critique of Practical Reason LE Lectures on Ethics G Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals MM Te Metaphysics of Morals NF Notes and Fragments R Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason Schopenhauer References to Schopenhauer’s writings are cited according to the follow- ing abbreviations and the page number of the editions listed in the bibliography.
Recommended publications
  • Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary History of Suicidology: Learning from the Past for a Better Future Submitted to Prof. John Hartwig I
    WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY HISTORY OF SUICIDOLOGY: LEARNING FROM THE PAST FOR A BETTER FUTURE SUBMITTED TO PROF. JOHN HARTWIG IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE MASTERS OF DIVINITY PROGRAM BY JORDAN P. BENCE MARCH 8, 2019 ABSTRACT Since 2008, suicide has ranked among the top 10 leading causes of death in the United States. In 2016, suicide was the second leading cause of death for individuals ages 10-34 and the fourth leading cause of death for individuals ages 35-54. From 1999 through 2017, the suicide rate has increased by 33%.1 To say that suicide is a problem in our country would be a huge understatement. With each new year as statistics are released data reveals the truth that suicide is only becoming more and more prevalent. But why does it seem like no one is talking about it? Why is discussion regarding suicide often done in private, behind closed doors, or not at all. This thesis will take a look back at the long-term negative affect the past has had and still has to this day regarding the discussion of suicide. It will also partially suggest changes to advance the discussion moving forward. 1 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db330.htm ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………..………………….1 PART ONE: THE PAST……………………………………………………………………….…5 Discussion Begins In The Ancient World 5 Greek Philosophy Discusses Suicide 5 Rome Combats Suicide For All The Wrong Reasons 10 Ancient World Glorifies Suicide 11 Suicide During The Middle Ages 14 Blatant Condemnation From The Church 16 Defense Against Donatism 17 Aquinas Supports
    [Show full text]
  • Spirituality and Suicidal Behavior: the Mediating Role of Self-Forgiveness and Psychache
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Spirituality and Suicidal Behavior: The ediM ating Role of Self-Forgiveness and Psychache Benjamin B. Hall East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Multicultural Psychology Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Hall, Benjamin B., "Spirituality and Suicidal Behavior: The eM diating Role of Self-Forgiveness and Psychache" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3222. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3222 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spirituality and Suicidal Behavior: The Mediating Role of Self-Forgiveness and Psychache __________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Psychology East Tennessee State University __________________ In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Psychology __________________ by Benjamin Hall May 2017 __________________ Jon R. Webb, Chair Chris S. Dula Stacey L. Williams Keywords: Religion, Spirituality, Forgiveness, Psychache, Suicide ABSTRACT Spirituality and Suicidal Behavior: The Mediating Role of Self-Forgiveness and Psychache by Benjamin Hall Growing evidence for protective factors of spirituality against physical and mental health related outcomes has led to the consideration of spirituality as a protective factor for suicidal behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Affirmation of the Will
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-62695-9 - Schopenhauer: A Biography David E. Cartwright Excerpt More information 1 The Affirmation of the Will RTHUR SCHOPENHAUER VIEWED himself as homeless. This sense of A homelessness became the leitmotif of both his life and his philos- ophy. After the first five years of his life in Danzig, where he was born on 22 February 1788, his family fled the then free city to avoid Prus- sian control. From that point on, he said, “I have never acquired a new home.”1 He lived in Hamburg on and off for fourteen years, but he had his best times when he was away from that city. When he left Hamburg, he felt as if he were escaping a prison. He lived for four years in Dresden, but he would only view this city as the birthplace of his principal work, The World as Will and Representation. More than a decade in Berlin did nothing to give him a sense of belonging. He would angrily exclaim that he was no Berliner. After living as a noncitizen resident in Frankfurt am Main for the last twenty-eight years of his life, and after spending fifty years attempting to understand the nature and meaning of the world, he would ultimately conclude that the world itself was not his home. If one were to take this remark seriously, then even Danzig had not been his home. He was homeless from birth. But being homeless from birth did not mean that there was no point to his life. Schopenhauer would also conclude that from birth he had a mission in life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complexity of Roman Suicide Carmine Anthony Ruff
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 1974 The complexity of Roman suicide Carmine Anthony Ruff Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Ruff, Carmine Anthony, "The ompc lexity of Roman suicide" (1974). Master's Theses. Paper 937. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE COMPLEXITY OF ROMAN SUICIDE BY CARMINE ANTHONY RUFFA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN CLASSICAL STUDIES MAY 1974 APPROVAL SHEET ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE • . • • . .iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . • . • • • • . • • • • • . • 1 II. ANCIENT SUICIDE: A PROBLEM OF SEMANTICS. • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Latin Citations to Suicide The Absence of A Standard Word Or Phrase III. PHILOSOPHIC SUICIDE . • .11 The Attitude of the Latin Philosophers Toward Suicide The Divergent Views of the Stoic Philosophers The Effect of Cato's Suicide on Stoicism IV. THE TREATMENT OF LUCRETIA'S SUICIDE BY LIVY AND AUGUSTINE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 4 Section I: Livy's Lucretia Section II: Augustine's Denunciation of Lucretia v. SUICIDE IN THE AENEID • • • • • • . .61 Vergii's Development of Dido's Suicidal Personality The Condemnation of Suicides in the Underworld Amata's Suicide CONCLUSION. .80 APPENDIX I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 83 APPENDIX II • . .86 BIBLIOGRAPHY . .91 VITA . .99 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to acknowledge two people who have influenced and inspired his academic and professional life.
    [Show full text]
  • National Consensual Narrative Against Terrorism Umbreen Javaid* Abstract When Taliban Were
    Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 22, Issue - 2, 2015, 383:398 National Consensual Narrative against Terrorism Umbreen Javaid* Abstract When Taliban were fighting against USSR, America, Pakistan and Western bloc along with many other countries of the world gave them moral and material support. They were given the name of Mujahideen and their struggle against USSR was considered as ‘holy war’. They also developed a strong narrative that impressed not only Mujahideen but the outer world also. However, after the disintegration of USSR, they were left unattended; therefore, they also changed their direction and started their struggle against imperialism and non Muslim Europe and especially America. After the incident of 9/11 USA along with her allies launched a war against them labeling them as terrorists. However there is a point of view that they cannot be completely defeated with military force. Their ideology or narrative that has become very strong should also be encountered. Key Words: Terrorism, narrative, Pakistan, Afghanistan, al-Qaida. Introduction "Mujahideen is a word literally comes from the same Arabic root as jihad, which means struggle. Therefore, a mujahid is a person who struggles. In the milieu of Afghanistan through the late twentieth century, the mujahideen were Islamic combatants shielding their state from the USSR”, which in 1979 assaulted and waged a pointless and gory war for a decade. Afghan mujahideen were outstandingly varied group including Uzbeks, Tajiks, ethnic Pashtuns, and others. Some were patron by Iran, whilst numerous groups were formation of Deoband Muslims and pro-Pakistan elements (Szczepanski, n.d. “Who Were the Mujahideen of Afghanistan?” about news.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87185-3 - Arthur Schopenhauer: Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays: Volume 2 Edited by Adrian Del Caro and Christopher Janaway Frontmatter More information ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER Parerga and Paralipomena The purpose of the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Schopenhauer is to offer translations of the best modern German editions of Schopenhauer’s work in a uniform format suitable for Schopenhauer scholars, together with philosophical introductions and full editorial apparatus. With the publication of Parerga and Paralipomena in 1851, there finally came some measure of the fame that Schopenhauer thought was his due. Described by Schopenhauer himself as ‘incomparably more popular than everything up till now’, Parerga is a miscellany of essays addressing themes that complement his work The World as Will and Representation, along with more divergent, speculative pieces. It includes essays on method, logic, the intellect, Kant, pantheism, natural science, religion, education, and language. The present volume offers a new translation, a substantial introduction explaining the context of the essays, and extensive editorial notes on the different published versions of the work. This readable and scholarly edition will be an essential reference for those studying Schopenhauer, history of philosophy, and nineteenth-century German philosophy. adrian del caro is Distinguished Professor of Humanities and Head of Modern Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Tennessee. He has published many books, including The Early Poetry of Paul Celan: In the beginning was the word (1997) and Grounding the Nietzsche Rhetoric of Earth (2004). He has published numerous articles in journals including Journal of the History of Ideas, Philosophy and Literature, and German Studies Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euthanasia Debate: International Experience and Canadian Policy Proposals
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-14-2016 12:00 AM The Euthanasia Debate: International Experience and Canadian Policy Proposals Lorna M. Fratschko The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Gary Badcock The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Lorna M. Fratschko 2016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Fratschko, Lorna M., "The Euthanasia Debate: International Experience and Canadian Policy Proposals" (2016). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3673. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3673 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This thesis examines the problematic prospect of the introduction of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide into Canadian society. The thesis argues that euthanasia is too simplistic an approach to address the complexities of end of life issues. The policy proposal under active discussion is profoundly mistaken. The language of euthanasia is examined in relation to the choice of words used, drawing attention to how words, when used loosely, can distort reality in this matter. Historical experience from other jurisdictions is presented to provide a context for this discussion. A "slippery slope" argument emerges via the claim that, in practice and in principle, euthanasia can neither be contained nor managed upon its introduction into a society.
    [Show full text]
  • NASS MONOGRAPH #15 (2011) on the Specter of Speciesism in Spinoza
    North American Spinoza Society NASS MONOGRAPH #15 (2011) On the Specter of Speciesism in Spinoza Michael Strawser University of Central Florida Copyright 2011, North American Spinoza Society San Diego, California North American Spinoza Society (NASS) The North American Spinoza Society (NASS), an organization of professional philosophers, philosophy students, and others interested in Spinoza, aims to foster and to promote the study of Spinoza’s philosophy, both in its historical context and in relation to issues of contemporary concern in all areas of research, and to foster communications among North American philosophers and other Spinozists world-wide through other national Spinoza societies. NASS fosters the study of Spinoza through the publication of the NASS Newsletter, org anization of regional meetings in association with meetings of the American Philosophical Association, and circulation of working research papers related to Spinoza and/or Spinozism. The NASS Monograph Series is an occasional one, offering papers selected by the NASS Board. Official languages of NASS are English, French, and Spanish: communications from members and publications may be in any of these. Membership in NASS is open to all who are in agreement with its purposes. Dues are $10.00 per year for regular memberships. Student membership dues are $5.00 per year. Membership for retired or unemployed academics is $5.00 per year. 20% of all membership income is allocated for support of Studia Spinozana. Members receive the NASS Newsletter, NASS Monograph for their membership year, and program papers. NASS Monographs: Purchase Prices Domestic (USA): 3.00 USD postpaid via third class. Foreign (all others): 5.00 USD postpaid via airmail.
    [Show full text]
  • On David Hume's Philosophy of Suicide
    Talisik: An Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy On David Hume’s Philosophy of Suicide Aldrin Matthew L. Go Abstract: It is evident that suicide cases remain prevalent in society today, due to man’s misery and experience of anxiety and frustration. Scottish Enlightenment philosopher David Hume (1711 – 1779) is famously known through his skeptical approach on epistemology, ethics, and religion. Considerations of other vital aspects of his philosophy are, such as “being a man”, are often overlooked, primarily because Hume is viewed primarily within the positivist and utilitarian framework. Hence, the initial endeavor of the paper is to interpret Hume within the existential context of his philosophy of suicide. Hume recognizes that misery is caused by one’s violent passions, and pure solitude, or the absence of companions such as family, friends, or relatives. Hume’s moral philosophy endorses the importance of benevolence towards our fellow human beings; as conflict, oppression, and violence are often causes of suicide. Thus, the primary endeavor of this paper is to examine parts of Hume’s life and philosophy in order to derive Hume’s response on suicide. It can be observed that in Hume’s posthumous essays Of Suicide and On the Immortality of the Soul denies the arbitrary determinations of the Supreme Deity. Following this, Hume presents four essays on happiness – a response against the violent nature of both the world and self. Through this can I construct a preliminary avenue for the possibility of a “Humean Existentialism” Thus; the primary endeavor of this paper is to examine Hume’s life and philosophy in order to derive Hume’s response to suicide; and subsequently, to misery, anxiety, and frustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: Development, Reliability, and Validity in an Adolescent Sample
    Psychological Assessment Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 19, No. 3, 309–317 1040-3590/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.309 Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: Development, Reliability, and Validity in an Adolescent Sample Matthew K. Nock, Elizabeth B. Holmberg, Valerie I. Photos, and Bethany D. Michel Harvard University The authors developed the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) and evaluated its psychometric properties. The SITBI is a structured interview that assesses the presence, frequency, and characteristics of a wide range of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, including suicidal ideation, suicide plans, suicide gestures, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). This initial study, based on the administration of the SITBI to 94 adolescents and young adults, suggested that the SITBI has strong interrater reliability (average ␬ϭ.99, r ϭ 1.0) and test–retest reliability (average ␬ϭ.70, intraclass correlation coefficient ϭ .44) over a 6-month period. Moreover, concurrent validity was demonstrated via strong correspondence between the SITBI and other measures of suicidal ideation (average ␬ϭ.54), suicide attempt (␬ϭ.65), and NSSI (average ␬ϭ.87). The authors concluded that the SITBI uniformly and comprehensively assesses a wide range of self-injury-related constructs and provides a new instrument that can be administered with relative ease in both research and clinical settings. Keywords: suicide, self-injury, assessment, reliability, validity Although impressive advances have been made in the study of that many of the measures currently available do not use clear and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) over the past several specific definitions of the SITB being assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide in Shakespeare's Tragedies: a Thematic Analysis
    ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1145-1156, September 2015 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0605.30 Suicide in Shakespeare's Tragedies: A Thematic Analysis Hussein Zamani University of Isfahan, Iran Pyeaam Abbasi University of Isfahan, Iran Abstract—The Renaissance clearly witnessed a revitalization of human’s worldview towards education, the arts, and critical thinking. In the midst of this social, cultural and political transformation, a renewed perspective was held on the subjects of euthanasia and suicide. Philosophy began to struggle free from the fetters of Christianity and to redefine its targets as the production of free and intellectual citizens. Many well- known figures of Renaissance philosophy put forward theses that were reckoned at the time to be harshly iconoclastic, such as the permissibility of suicide. Shakespeare, the chief figure of the English renaissance, in line with anti-religious discourses of his time, employs characters who radically pertain to suicidal ideologies of the ancients. The dominant theme of suicide pervading his works demonstrates how the Renaissance man mirrored the Greek and Roman ideologies and how the process of secularization exposed him with a sort of absurdity as a result of which suicide could be tolerated or even more admired. The present paper, aims, on the one hand, to defy many contemporary arguments which ill-foundedly endeavor to introduce Shakespeare as an anti-suicide figure. On the other hand, the authors show how Shakespeare was heavily influenced by the religious, humanistic, artistic and scientific discourses of his time in his exposure to the theme of suicide.
    [Show full text]
  • Schopenhauer's Theory of Justice
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1994 Schopenhauer's Theory of Justice Raymond B. Marcin The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Raymond B. Marcin, Schopenhauer's Theory of Justice, 43 CATH. U. L. REV. 813 (1994). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCHOPENHAUER'S THEORY OF JUSTICE Raymond B. Marcin* "[I]n all that happens or indeed can happen to the individual, justice is always done to it." Arthur Schopenhauer** There is a curiosity about Schopenhauer. Most people know his name but little or nothing about his philosophy. If pressed, many would iden- tify him as a precursor of some aspects of fascism or Hitlerism, and per- haps he might have been, but his philosophy was not. The truth is that we would all be much better off if we knew something about his philosophy, but forgot his name, for Arthur Schopenhauer was a strange rarity-a true prophet who did not practice what he preached. Schopenhauer's theory of justice, the reader should be cautioned, is radical in the extreme. Justice, in Schopenhauer's system, is not an epis- temological construct.
    [Show full text]