Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Business & Technology Report April 2021 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Business & Technology Report April 2021 RADWIND PROJECT REPORT SERIES: Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Prepared By: NRECA Research and project partners. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Wind Energy Technologies Office Award Number DE-EE0008958. Primary Author: Alice Orrell, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NRECA Contacts: Michael Leitman (RADWIND Project Manager) Senior Analyst, Economics & Business NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Venkat Banunarayanan (RADWIND Principal Investigator) Vice President, Integrated Grid NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Legal Notices This work contains findings that are general in nature. Readers are reminded to perform due diligence in applying these findings to their specific needs, as it is not possible for NRECA Research to have sufficient understanding of any specific situation to ensure applicability of the findings in all cases. The information in this work is not a recommendation, model, or standard for all electric cooperatives. Electric cooperatives are: (1) independent entities; (2) governed by independent boards of directors; and (3) affected by different member, financial, legal, political, policy, operational, and other considerations. For these reasons, electric cooperatives make independent decisions and investments based upon their individual needs, desires, and constraints. Neither the authors nor NRECA Research assume liability for how readers may use, interpret, or apply the information, analysis, templates, and guidance herein or with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process contained herein. In addition, the authors and NRECA Research make no warranty or representation that the use of these contents does not infringe on privately held rights. This work product constitutes the intellectual property of NRECA Research and its suppliers. NRECA Research is a charitable organization and related company of NRECA. Copyright © 2021 by NRECA Research. All Rights Reserved. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Credit: © 2021 NRECA Research. Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Co-op Areas Table of Contents RADWIND Project .................................................................................................................... 1 What Is Distributed Wind? ...................................................................................................... 2 Distributed Wind Turbine Sizes ....................................................................................... 3 Distributed Wind Hybrids ................................................................................................ 3 Distributed Wind and Demand Response ....................................................................... 3 Microgrids and Isolated Grids ......................................................................................... 4 Distributed Wind Use Cases ................................................................................................... 4 Front-of-Meter Use Case ......................................................................................................... 5 Behind-the-Meter Use Case .................................................................................................... 7 Off-Grid Use Case .................................................................................................................... 9 Putting It All Together ........................................................................................................... 11 Next Steps .............................................................................................................................. 13 References ............................................................................................................................. 14 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Co-op Areas RADWIND Project This is the first in a series of NRECA Research reports about wind as a distributed energy resource (DER). This report explains the primary ways, or use cases, that wind energy technologies can be deployed in electric cooperative service territories as a DER. This use case report lays the foundation for the future Value Case and Business Case reports. NRECA Research’s Rural Area Distributed Wind Integration Network Development (RADWIND) seeks to understand, address, and reduce the technical risks and market barriers to distributed wind adoption by rural utilities. The goal of the project is to reduce the barriers for distributed wind deployment, either as a standalone resource or as part of a hybrid power plant with other DER. For more information on the project and additional resources, please visit the project landing page at www.cooperative.com/radwind. 1 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Co-op Areas What Is Distributed Wind? Distributed wind turbines are distributed energy resources connected at the distribution level of the electricity grid or in off-grid applications. Distributed wind technologies can range from a less than 1- kilowatt (kW) off-grid wind turbine at a remote cabin or oil and gas platform, to a 15-kW wind turbine at a home or farm, to several multi-megawatt wind turbines at a university campus, manufacturing facility, or connected to the distribution system of a utility. As a result, distributed wind is differentiated from wholesale power that is generated at large wind farms and carried over transmission lines to substations for distribution to distant end users. Wind as a DER is an emerging opportunity for rural America. Many of the regions in the United States that offer quality wind resources and population densities acceptable for distributed wind development are in rural electric cooperative territories. Research from the U.S. Department of Energy suggests there is significant economic potential for distributed wind capacity additions on rural distribution grids (Lantz et al. 2016). Rural electric cooperatives1 and their consumer-members are utilizing distributed wind across the United States. The RADWIND team has identified over 200 megawatt (MW) of distributed wind capacity in about 80 cooperative territories. Some of this installed capacity are from consumer-member-owned wind turbines interconnected to cooperative distribution systems via net metering agreements, but most of the capacity is either owned by or under power purchase agreement (PPA) contracts by distribution and generation and transmission (G&T) cooperatives, as shown in Figure 1. Cooperative projects are typically larger projects (i.e. around 10 MW) consisting of multiple large-scale turbines (1 MW and greater in size), hence their greater representation in Figure 1. Figure 1: Percentage of Distributed Wind Capacity, in Megawatts, by Customer Type in Cooperative Territories, 2003-2019 1 While this report generally uses “cooperatives,” NRECA’s membership also includes more than 40 utilities that are not organized as cooperatives, mostly rural public power districts as well as small municipal, tribal, and mutual utilities. While business models differ, this report should be applicable to them as well as other rural utilities that are not NRECA members. 2 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Co-op Areas Distributed wind projects can utilize a variety of turbine technologies and can be deployed as standalone distributed generation projects or in combination with other DER. The remainder of this section discusses some technical considerations for distributed wind projects. Distributed Wind Turbine Sizes The RADWIND team considers wind turbines in the following three size segments: ● Small wind turbines are up through 100 kW in nameplate capacity2 ● Medium wind turbines are 101 kW to 999 kW in nameplate capacity ● Large-scale wind turbines are 1 MW and greater in nameplate capacity Distributed Wind Hybrids Wind energy technology is increasingly being combined with other distributed energy resources and technologies, such as batteries, solar PV, or combined heat and power (CHP) on distribution systems. These combination projects can be referred to as distributed wind hybrids. Distributed wind hybrid projects can generally be categorized based on their operational and locational characteristics. Distributed wind hybrids can be co-located resources only sharing a location,
Recommended publications
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)
    Wind Farms in the United States (excluding California) and Wind Speeds at known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 26 August Contact: Kelsey Wolf-Cloud, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate Note used only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. Total Onshore Total Wind Wind Total Number of Farms in Farms Projected Projected onshore wind farms Country analyzed MW >6.5m/s MW >6.5m/s in country (MWs) (MW) at 15m agl at 20m agl 1,292 104,212 54,627 11,181 22,059 Average Wind Speed Average Average at 20m agl Onshore Wind Farm # of Wind Speed Wind Speed Power (kW) m/s Name Turbines at 80m agl at 15m agl (calculated m/s m/s using wind shear) Foote Creek Rim 82,950 130 12.19 10.93 11.15 Kaheawa II 21,000 14 10.08 8.31 8.58 Rock River 50,000 50 9.7 7.98 8.26 Kaheawa I 30,000 20 9.8 7.97 8.25 Caprock Wind Ranch 80,000 80 9.91 7.7 8.04 Wild Horse 228,600 127 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse 268,200 149 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse II 39,600 22 8.9 7.42 7.66 Pioneer 85,100 46 8.89 7.36 7.60 High Plains 99,000 66 9.07 7.35 7.63 Red Canyon 84,000 56 9.47 7.34 7.66 Auwahi Wind Farm 24,000 8 9.68 7.27 7.63 Blue Canyon II 151,200 84 9.1 7.23 7.53 Blue Canyon 74,250 45 9.04 7.11 7.40 Seven Mile Hill 118,500 79 9.19 7.06 7.39 Glenrock II 99,000 66 9.08 7.05 7.36 McFadden Ridge 28,500 19 8.67 7.05 7.30 High Lonesome 100,000 40 8.36 7 7.20 Hawai Renewable 10,560 16 9.01 6.91 7.24 Happy
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Benefits of Colorado's Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry
    The Economic Benefits of Colorado’s Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry July 2020 Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with insightful and strategic consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive custom analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific real estate and business activities and government cost and benefit impacts. • Real Estate and Public Finance Economics Analysis and strategy for infill redevelopment, adaptive reuses, and property development including market and feasibility studies, public investment analysis, and public-private partnering opportunities. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Projects
    A SE SAMPLE PROJECTS Last updated: December 31, 2015 Page 1 of 5 WIND FARM TOWERS Nestor Agbayani has over 25 years of experience in wind farm tower structural engineering consulting and design. The following is a sample of recent wind tower projects for which he served as Engineer of Record, consultant, tower designer, or plan reviewer at Agbayani Structural Engineering (ASE) from the present back to early 2011 or while formerly associated as a Partner at MSKA Structural Engineers. TOTAL RECENT WIND ENERGY PROJECTS: YEAR TOTAL 2015 3705 MW 2013 and 2014 2085 MW 2012 2140 MW 2011 1570 MW 2010 2400 MW 2009 1800 MW 2008 and 2007 2000 MW See the following pages for a detailed list of sample tower projects. AGBAYANI STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TEL: 661-742-1327 TH 1201 24 STREET, SUITE B110-116 EMAIL: [email protected] BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 WEB: www.agbayanistructural.com SAMPLE TOWER PROJECTS Page 2 of 5 Last updated: December 31, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLIENT REPOWER MM92 100M ONTARIO, CANADA DESIGN REUSE REPOWER SYSTEMS INC. NP100 23.4M LATTICE TOWER TEHACHAPI, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW NORTHERN POWER GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW 85M N. KINGSTOWN, RI DESIGN REUSE GOLDWIND USA INC. VESTAS V27/29 31M DESIGN NEW TOWER+FMP FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V47 50M(IA) DESIGN NEW TOWER FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V82-80M(IIA) CLOVIS, NM DESIGN REUSE VESTAS AWT MITSUBUSHI MWT62 60M(IIA) KERN CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) VESTAS V47 60M(IA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW EWINDFARM, INC. NORDEX N90-2.5MW 80M(IA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA NORDEX N100-2.5MW 80M(IIA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA MITSUBUSHI MWT62 69M(IIA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW TENDERLAND POWER MITSUBUSHI MWT62 47M(S) PALM SPRINGS, CA DESIGN: SEISMIC TOWER TENDERLAND POWER EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLANO CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) SUZLON S95-2.1MW 91M(IIA) FORT HAYES, KS CONSULT: FOUNDATION FATIGUE ENVIROTECH CONSULT GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW HAVILAND, OH CONSULT: FIELD ERECTION GOLDWIND USA INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Mile Wind Power Project – Welcome to the Suncor Community
    WELCOME TO THE SUNCOR COMMUNITY MEETING Please fill out a comment card and visit www.suncor.com/fortymilewind for more information. If you have any further questions or concerns, please call 1-866-344-0178 ext. 2 or email [email protected] ABOUT SUNCOR Suncor Energy is Canada’s leading integrated energy company. Our operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, renewable energy development, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Our vision is to be trusted stewards of valuable natural resources. Guided by our values, we will lead the way to deliver economic prosperity, improved social well-being and a healthy environment for today and tomorrow. SUNCOR’S RENEWABLE ENERGY BUSINESS • Wind power is one of the fastest growing sources of electricity generation in the world. Investment in wind power is a key component of Suncor’s climate change action plan. • Suncor and our partners are currently involved in five operational wind power facilities that have a generating capacity of 187 megawatts (MW), enough to power about 65,000 Canadian homes. • Suncor has developed and constructed a total of eight wind power facilities with a total generating capacity of 395 MW Wind Projects Developed by Suncor Date Project Name Location Capacity Turbines Current Owners 2002 SunBridge Saskatchewan 11 MW 17, 660 kW Vestas Suncor & Enbridge 2004 Magrath Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2006 Chin Chute Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2007 Ripley Ontario 76 MW 38, 2.0 MW Enercon Suncor & Acciona 2010 Kent Breeze 1 Ontario 20 MW 20, 2.5 MW GE TransAlta 2011 Wintering Hills 1 Alberta 88 MW 55, 1.6 MW GE IKEA Canada 2015 Adelaide Ontario 40 MW 18, 2.3 MW Siemens Suncor & Aamjiwnaang First Nation 2015 Cedar Point II 1 Ontario 100 MW 46, 2.3 MW Siemens Cedar Point II LP 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region
    For more information, visit: http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/ windexchange/ 2016 STATE OF WIND DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES BY REGION National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable April 2017 Energy, LLC. TP-5000-67624 • April 2017 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy NREL prints on paper that contains Offi ce of Energy Effi ciency and Renewable Energy recycled content. Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region Ruth Baranowski, Frank Oteri, Ian Baring-Gould, and Suzanne Tegen National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. WE14.BB01 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5000-67624 Golden, CO 80401 April 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    This Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 RESOURCE PLANNING BASICS....................................... 10 DEFINITIONS........................................................................... 10 EXAMPLES OF TRADITIONAL SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES............. 11 EXAMPLES OF RENEWABLE SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES.............. 13 PLANNING TOOLS ................................................................... 14 COMPUTER MODELS ............................................................... 17 2.2 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW....................................................... 19 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY CHALLENGES ........................... 19 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND CO2 EMISSIONS..................... 24 FUEL ADEQUACY – NATURAL GAS............................................ 24 FUEL ADEQUACY - COAL ......................................................... 28 STORAGE RESOURCES............................................................ 29 FEDERAL PTC EXTENSION ...................................................... 35 ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS FOR PPAS .............................. 36 REGIONAL AND NATIONAL TRANSMISSION INITIATIVES................ 41 2.3 PUBLIC SERVICE OVERVIEW........................................... 49 SERVICE TERRITORY............................................................... 49 EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ............... 50 OVERVIEW OF THE 2007 ERP ................................................. 51 2020 PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ..................... 53 COLORADO TRANSMISSION PLANNING
    [Show full text]