Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents This Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 RESOURCE PLANNING BASICS....................................... 10 DEFINITIONS........................................................................... 10 EXAMPLES OF TRADITIONAL SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES............. 11 EXAMPLES OF RENEWABLE SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES.............. 13 PLANNING TOOLS ................................................................... 14 COMPUTER MODELS ............................................................... 17 2.2 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW....................................................... 19 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY CHALLENGES ........................... 19 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND CO2 EMISSIONS..................... 24 FUEL ADEQUACY – NATURAL GAS............................................ 24 FUEL ADEQUACY - COAL ......................................................... 28 STORAGE RESOURCES............................................................ 29 FEDERAL PTC EXTENSION ...................................................... 35 ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS FOR PPAS .............................. 36 REGIONAL AND NATIONAL TRANSMISSION INITIATIVES................ 41 2.3 PUBLIC SERVICE OVERVIEW........................................... 49 SERVICE TERRITORY............................................................... 49 EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ............... 50 OVERVIEW OF THE 2007 ERP ................................................. 51 2020 PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ..................... 53 COLORADO TRANSMISSION PLANNING INITIATIVES..................... 54 2.4 EVALUATION OF EXISTING RESOURCES....................... 56 COMPANY OWNED RESOURCES ............................................... 56 PURCHASED POWER ............................................................... 57 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................... 60 DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS................................. 66 ATTACHMENT 2.4-1 OWNED GENERATION UNIT LOCATIONS..... 69 ATTACHMENT 2.4-2 OWNED GENERATION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS 70 ATTACHMENT 2.4-3 OWNED GENERATION AVAILABILITY .......... 72 ATTACHMENT 2.4-4 ESTIMATED REMAINING USEFUL LIFE........ 73 ATTACHMENT 2.4-5 CAPACITY FACTOR ESTIMATES................. 74 ATTACHMENT 2.4-6 PPA DURATION AND MODIFICATION TERMS75 ATTACHMENT 2.4-7 2010 WATER CONSUMPTION ................... 78 2.5 TRANSMISSION RESOURCES .......................................... 81 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ........................................... 81 TOT TRANSMISSION TRANSFER CAPABILITY LIMITATIONS .......... 83 SB07-100 NEW TRANSMISSION ADDITIONS .............................. 87 2011 Electric Resource Plan Volume 2 Technical Appendix Public Service Company of Colorado Page 2-1 TRANSMISSION ADDITIONS....................................................... 92 TRANSMISSION INJECTION CAPABILITY...................................... 93 TRANSMISSION SERVICE AGREEMENTS .................................... 95 COORDINATION AGREEMENTS.................................................. 97 2.6 ELECTRIC ENERGY AND DEMAND FORECASTS........... 98 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 98 ACTUAL AND FORECASTED DEMAND AND ENERGY................... 103 ENERGY AND DEMAND FORECASTS, 2011-2050 ..................... 104 FORECAST OVERVIEW........................................................... 113 FORECAST METHODOLOGIES ................................................. 114 VARIABILITY DUE TO WEATHER .............................................. 120 HIGH GROWTH FORECAST..................................................... 123 LOW GROWTH FORECAST ..................................................... 124 FORECAST ACCURACY .......................................................... 128 DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION .......................................... 136 COORDINATION LETTERS....................................................... 149 ATTACHMENT 2.6-1 COORDINATION LETTERS ....................... 150 2.7 HOURLY LOAD PROFILES .............................................. 155 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 155 2.8 PHASE 1 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MODELING DETAILS 216 STRATEGIST MODEL DESCRIPTION......................................... 216 ORGANIZATION OF SECTION 2.8............................................. 216 1. STRATEGIST MODELING - SET-UP AND FUNCTION .......... 217 2. MODELING THE ALTERNATIVE PLANS............................. 229 3. MODELING RESULTS.................................................... 242 ATTACHMENT 2.8-1 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ...................... 263 ATTACHMENT 2.8-2 STRATEGIST MODELED EMISSIONS......... 277 ATTACHMENT 2.8-3 SENSITIVITY RESULTS ........................... 288 ATTACHMENT 2.8-4 LEC CALCULATIONS IN FIGURE 1.5-1 OF VOLUME 1 305 ATTACHMENT 2.8-5 ECONOMIC CARRYING CHARGE.............. 308 2.9 PHASE 2 BID EVALUATION............................................. 317 ALL-SOURCE RFP RELEASE AND INITIAL BID DUE DILIGENCE .. 319 INITIAL BID ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND BID SCREENING............. 321 ASSESSMENT OF ARAPAHOE 4 AND CHEROKEE 4 ON GAS........ 325 SELECTION OF BIDS FOR COMPUTER MODELING ..................... 327 COMPUTER MODELING AND PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT ........... 328 WINTER GENERATION ADEQUACY OF PORTFOLIOS .................. 333 SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF PORTFOLIOS ................................. 333 ATTACHMENT 2.9-1 WINTER GENERATION ADEQUACY STUDY.. 334 2.10 RESERVE MARGIN SUPPORT – LOLP STUDY.............. 337 2011 Electric Resource Plan Volume 2 Technical Appendix Public Service Company of Colorado Page 2-2 2.11 LOAD AND RESOURCE TABLE ...................................... 338 ATTACHMENT 2.11-1 RAP L&R........................................... 339 2.12 COAL PLANT CYCLING COST STUDY ........................... 340 2.13 WIND INTEGRATION COST STUDY ................................ 341 2.14 2011 WIND LIMIT STUDY ................................................. 342 2.15 CHEROKEE 4 REPLACEMENT ALTERNATIVES STUDY343 2.16 10-12 YEAR TRANSMISSION PLANNING STUDY .......... 344 2011 Electric Resource Plan Volume 2 Technical Appendix Public Service Company of Colorado Page 2-3 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1-1 General Cost Structure of Thermal Resources________________12 Table 2.1-2 Simple Load & Resources Table___________________________15 Table 2.2-1 Gas Resource Review Summary __________________________25 Table 2.2-2 Evaluation of PRB Coal Resource _________________________29 Table 2.3-1 Resources Added Through 2007 ERP (MW) _________________52 Table 2.4-1 Public Service Owned Generation Facilities (MW) _____________56 Table 2.4-2 Public Service Owned Generation Facilities __________________57 Table 2.4-3 PPA Generation Resource (MW) __________________________57 Table 2.4-4 PPA Summer Capacity __________________________________58 Table 2.4-5 PPA Summer Capacity - Under 10 MW _____________________59 Table 2.4-6 Purchase Power Capacity by Fuel Type (2012) _______________60 Table 2.4-7 Summary of Public Service Water Rights Portfolio_____________63 Table 2.4-8 Summary of Public Service Water Contract Portfolio ___________63 Table 2.4-9 Energy Savings Goals Used in 2011 ERP ___________________66 Table 2.5-1 TOT Transmission Transfer Capability Limitations (2011) _______85 Table 2.5-2 SB07-100 Projects Likely to be In-Service During the RAP ______90 Table 2.5-3 Injection Capabilities ____________________________________93 Table 2.5-4 Wheeling Provided under Existing PPAs ____________________96 Table 2.6-1 Actual and Forecasted Summer Native Load Peak Demand ____101 Table 2.6-2 Actual and Forecasted Annual Native Load Energy Sales ______102 Table 2.6-3 Actual and Forecasted Summer Peak Demand and Annual Energy 104 Table 2.6-4 Base Case: Energy/Coincident Summer and Winter Demand ___105 Table 2.6-5A Base Case: Energy/Coincident Summer Demand/Winter Peak Demand by Major Customer Class ____________________________________106 Table 2.6-5B Base Case: Energy/Coincident Summer Demand/Winter Peak Demand by Major Customer Class ____________________________________107 Table 2.6-6 Base Case: Energy and Capacity Sales to Other Utilities_______108 Table 2.6-7 Base Case: Intra-Utility Energy and Capacity Use ____________109 Table 2.6-8A Base Case: Losses by Major Customer Class _______________110 Table 2.6-8B Base Case: Losses by Major Customer Class _______________111 Table 2.6-9 Base Case: Energy and Peak Demand DSM Savings _________112 Table 2.6-10 Actual and Forecasted Summer Peak Demand ______________113 Table 2.6-11 Actual and Forecasted Annual Energy Sales ________________114 Table 2.6-12 Native Peak Demand Weather Variability ___________________121 Table 2.6-13 Annual Native Energy Sales Weather Variability _____________122 Table 2.6-14 Base Case, High, and Low Sales of Energy _________________126 Table 2.6-15 Base Case, High and Low Coincident Summer and Winter Peak Demand 127 Table 2.6-16 Native Energy Sales Forecast Comparison (GWh)____________129 Table 2.6-17 Forecast Sales less Actual Sales (GWh) ___________________129 Table 2.6-18 Coincident Summer Demand Forecast Comparison (MW)______130 Table 2.6-19 Forecast Demand less Actual Summer Native Peak Demand (MW) 130 2011 Electric Resource Plan Volume 2 Technical Appendix Public Service Company of Colorado Page 2-4 Table 2.6-20 Weather Normalized Coincident Summer Demand Forecast Comparison (MW) _________________________________________________131 Table 2.6-21 Forecast Demand less Actual Summer Demand (MW) ________131 Table 2.6-22 Coincident
Recommended publications
  • Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas
    Business & Technology Report April 2021 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Business & Technology Report April 2021 RADWIND PROJECT REPORT SERIES: Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Prepared By: NRECA Research and project partners. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Wind Energy Technologies Office Award Number DE-EE0008958. Primary Author: Alice Orrell, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NRECA Contacts: Michael Leitman (RADWIND Project Manager) Senior Analyst, Economics & Business NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Venkat Banunarayanan (RADWIND Principal Investigator) Vice President, Integrated Grid NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Legal Notices This work contains findings that are general in nature. Readers are reminded to perform due diligence in applying these findings to their specific needs, as it is not possible for NRECA Research to have sufficient understanding of any specific situation to ensure applicability of the findings in all cases. The information in this work is not a recommendation, model, or standard for all electric cooperatives. Electric cooperatives are: (1) independent entities; (2) governed by independent boards of directors; and (3) affected by different member, financial, legal, political, policy, operational, and other considerations. For these reasons, electric cooperatives make independent decisions and investments based upon their individual needs, desires, and constraints. Neither the authors nor NRECA Research assume liability for how readers may use, interpret, or apply the information, analysis, templates, and guidance herein or with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)
    Wind Farms in the United States (excluding California) and Wind Speeds at known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 26 August Contact: Kelsey Wolf-Cloud, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate Note used only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. Total Onshore Total Wind Wind Total Number of Farms in Farms Projected Projected onshore wind farms Country analyzed MW >6.5m/s MW >6.5m/s in country (MWs) (MW) at 15m agl at 20m agl 1,292 104,212 54,627 11,181 22,059 Average Wind Speed Average Average at 20m agl Onshore Wind Farm # of Wind Speed Wind Speed Power (kW) m/s Name Turbines at 80m agl at 15m agl (calculated m/s m/s using wind shear) Foote Creek Rim 82,950 130 12.19 10.93 11.15 Kaheawa II 21,000 14 10.08 8.31 8.58 Rock River 50,000 50 9.7 7.98 8.26 Kaheawa I 30,000 20 9.8 7.97 8.25 Caprock Wind Ranch 80,000 80 9.91 7.7 8.04 Wild Horse 228,600 127 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse 268,200 149 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse II 39,600 22 8.9 7.42 7.66 Pioneer 85,100 46 8.89 7.36 7.60 High Plains 99,000 66 9.07 7.35 7.63 Red Canyon 84,000 56 9.47 7.34 7.66 Auwahi Wind Farm 24,000 8 9.68 7.27 7.63 Blue Canyon II 151,200 84 9.1 7.23 7.53 Blue Canyon 74,250 45 9.04 7.11 7.40 Seven Mile Hill 118,500 79 9.19 7.06 7.39 Glenrock II 99,000 66 9.08 7.05 7.36 McFadden Ridge 28,500 19 8.67 7.05 7.30 High Lonesome 100,000 40 8.36 7 7.20 Hawai Renewable 10,560 16 9.01 6.91 7.24 Happy
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Benefits of Colorado's Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry
    The Economic Benefits of Colorado’s Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry July 2020 Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with insightful and strategic consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive custom analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific real estate and business activities and government cost and benefit impacts. • Real Estate and Public Finance Economics Analysis and strategy for infill redevelopment, adaptive reuses, and property development including market and feasibility studies, public investment analysis, and public-private partnering opportunities. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Projects
    A SE SAMPLE PROJECTS Last updated: December 31, 2015 Page 1 of 5 WIND FARM TOWERS Nestor Agbayani has over 25 years of experience in wind farm tower structural engineering consulting and design. The following is a sample of recent wind tower projects for which he served as Engineer of Record, consultant, tower designer, or plan reviewer at Agbayani Structural Engineering (ASE) from the present back to early 2011 or while formerly associated as a Partner at MSKA Structural Engineers. TOTAL RECENT WIND ENERGY PROJECTS: YEAR TOTAL 2015 3705 MW 2013 and 2014 2085 MW 2012 2140 MW 2011 1570 MW 2010 2400 MW 2009 1800 MW 2008 and 2007 2000 MW See the following pages for a detailed list of sample tower projects. AGBAYANI STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TEL: 661-742-1327 TH 1201 24 STREET, SUITE B110-116 EMAIL: [email protected] BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 WEB: www.agbayanistructural.com SAMPLE TOWER PROJECTS Page 2 of 5 Last updated: December 31, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLIENT REPOWER MM92 100M ONTARIO, CANADA DESIGN REUSE REPOWER SYSTEMS INC. NP100 23.4M LATTICE TOWER TEHACHAPI, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW NORTHERN POWER GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW 85M N. KINGSTOWN, RI DESIGN REUSE GOLDWIND USA INC. VESTAS V27/29 31M DESIGN NEW TOWER+FMP FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V47 50M(IA) DESIGN NEW TOWER FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V82-80M(IIA) CLOVIS, NM DESIGN REUSE VESTAS AWT MITSUBUSHI MWT62 60M(IIA) KERN CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) VESTAS V47 60M(IA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW EWINDFARM, INC. NORDEX N90-2.5MW 80M(IA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA NORDEX N100-2.5MW 80M(IIA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA MITSUBUSHI MWT62 69M(IIA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW TENDERLAND POWER MITSUBUSHI MWT62 47M(S) PALM SPRINGS, CA DESIGN: SEISMIC TOWER TENDERLAND POWER EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLANO CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) SUZLON S95-2.1MW 91M(IIA) FORT HAYES, KS CONSULT: FOUNDATION FATIGUE ENVIROTECH CONSULT GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW HAVILAND, OH CONSULT: FIELD ERECTION GOLDWIND USA INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Mile Wind Power Project – Welcome to the Suncor Community
    WELCOME TO THE SUNCOR COMMUNITY MEETING Please fill out a comment card and visit www.suncor.com/fortymilewind for more information. If you have any further questions or concerns, please call 1-866-344-0178 ext. 2 or email [email protected] ABOUT SUNCOR Suncor Energy is Canada’s leading integrated energy company. Our operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, renewable energy development, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Our vision is to be trusted stewards of valuable natural resources. Guided by our values, we will lead the way to deliver economic prosperity, improved social well-being and a healthy environment for today and tomorrow. SUNCOR’S RENEWABLE ENERGY BUSINESS • Wind power is one of the fastest growing sources of electricity generation in the world. Investment in wind power is a key component of Suncor’s climate change action plan. • Suncor and our partners are currently involved in five operational wind power facilities that have a generating capacity of 187 megawatts (MW), enough to power about 65,000 Canadian homes. • Suncor has developed and constructed a total of eight wind power facilities with a total generating capacity of 395 MW Wind Projects Developed by Suncor Date Project Name Location Capacity Turbines Current Owners 2002 SunBridge Saskatchewan 11 MW 17, 660 kW Vestas Suncor & Enbridge 2004 Magrath Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2006 Chin Chute Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2007 Ripley Ontario 76 MW 38, 2.0 MW Enercon Suncor & Acciona 2010 Kent Breeze 1 Ontario 20 MW 20, 2.5 MW GE TransAlta 2011 Wintering Hills 1 Alberta 88 MW 55, 1.6 MW GE IKEA Canada 2015 Adelaide Ontario 40 MW 18, 2.3 MW Siemens Suncor & Aamjiwnaang First Nation 2015 Cedar Point II 1 Ontario 100 MW 46, 2.3 MW Siemens Cedar Point II LP 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region
    For more information, visit: http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/ windexchange/ 2016 STATE OF WIND DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES BY REGION National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable April 2017 Energy, LLC. TP-5000-67624 • April 2017 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy NREL prints on paper that contains Offi ce of Energy Effi ciency and Renewable Energy recycled content. Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region Ruth Baranowski, Frank Oteri, Ian Baring-Gould, and Suzanne Tegen National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. WE14.BB01 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5000-67624 Golden, CO 80401 April 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]