Forty Mile Wind Power Project – Welcome to the Suncor Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forty Mile Wind Power Project – Welcome to the Suncor Community WELCOME TO THE SUNCOR COMMUNITY MEETING Please fill out a comment card and visit www.suncor.com/fortymilewind for more information. If you have any further questions or concerns, please call 1-866-344-0178 ext. 2 or email [email protected] ABOUT SUNCOR Suncor Energy is Canada’s leading integrated energy company. Our operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, renewable energy development, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Our vision is to be trusted stewards of valuable natural resources. Guided by our values, we will lead the way to deliver economic prosperity, improved social well-being and a healthy environment for today and tomorrow. SUNCOR’S RENEWABLE ENERGY BUSINESS • Wind power is one of the fastest growing sources of electricity generation in the world. Investment in wind power is a key component of Suncor’s climate change action plan. • Suncor and our partners are currently involved in five operational wind power facilities that have a generating capacity of 187 megawatts (MW), enough to power about 65,000 Canadian homes. • Suncor has developed and constructed a total of eight wind power facilities with a total generating capacity of 395 MW Wind Projects Developed by Suncor Date Project Name Location Capacity Turbines Current Owners 2002 SunBridge Saskatchewan 11 MW 17, 660 kW Vestas Suncor & Enbridge 2004 Magrath Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2006 Chin Chute Alberta 30 MW 20, 1.5 MW GE Suncor, Acciona & Enbridge 2007 Ripley Ontario 76 MW 38, 2.0 MW Enercon Suncor & Acciona 2010 Kent Breeze 1 Ontario 20 MW 20, 2.5 MW GE TransAlta 2011 Wintering Hills 1 Alberta 88 MW 55, 1.6 MW GE IKEA Canada 2015 Adelaide Ontario 40 MW 18, 2.3 MW Siemens Suncor & Aamjiwnaang First Nation 2015 Cedar Point II 1 Ontario 100 MW 46, 2.3 MW Siemens Cedar Point II LP 1. Suncor sold our interest in these projects over the last few years as part of ongoing activities focused on core businesses and exploring opportunities for strategic divestitures. WORKING WITH OUR STAKEHOLDERS Our Beliefs • Involving communities in activities that affect them • Transparency • Early engagement • Mutual benefit • Sharing up-to-date project information Goal • To be a trusted member of the communities where we operate by demonstrating our commitment to building and maintaining positive, meaningful relationships Objectives • Engage early • Understand concerns, interests and values of communities we work with • Develop long-term positive relationships • Be responsive to community concerns Approach • Build our knowledge of communities • Proactively engage with key stakeholders to share project information • Engage with community leaders on a regular basis • Understand development plans, visions and/or needs of community • Collaboratively work together to identify opportunities for shared benefit WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL WIND PROJECT A successful wind power project requires: 1) A strong wind resource 2) Access to transmission lines 3) An engaged and supportive community Suncor believes that this area has the necessary elements for the development of a successful wind project. We are here to learn more about your community and values - and to work together to develop our proposed wind project. Source: AESO 2015 Long-term Transmission Plan BENEFITS OF WIND What are the typical benefits of wind development? • Employment – Temporary jobs during construction and permanent jobs associated with the operations and maintenance of the Project. There is the potential that local contractors would be involved in the construction of the Project. • New Investment – In the form of local services and supplies such as infrastructure improvements, fuel, accommodation, meals and supplies for employees, construction personnel, and contractors who will spend time in the local communities. • Landowners and Community – Wind turbines provide additional revenue to landowners and have a minimal impact on current farming practices. Wind turbines are compatible with other land uses, and can serve as a boost for rural economic development. • Municipal Tax Revenues – Municipal taxes paid by wind companies to rural communities can be important, and the Project does not increase demand on municipal services or public works such as sewer and water upgrades. Payments from a wind project can be directly allocated to increasing local services or stabilizing local tax rates. • Clean Energy – Wind energy provides societal benefits by offsetting harmful emissions such as carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, and sulphur dioxides that are created through conventional, thermal power generation. • Stability and Predictability– Wind energy costs are stable and predictable over the long term because there are no fuel costs. Wind energy helps to diversify and decentralize our power supply. The Proposed Forty Mile Wind Power Project Proposed project details: • Size: 400 megawatts (MW) • Number of turbines: up to 175 • Tower height: up to 110 m • Rotor diameter: up to 145 m • Access and temporary construction roads • 2 project collector substations (Granlea & Maleb) • Underground and overhead electrical collector system from turbines to project collector substation • Connection infrastructure from project collector substations to the Alberta Interconnected Electrical System will be completed by Altalink Management Limited The proposed Forty Mile Wind Power Project will deliver generated electricity to the grid via two proposed substations which will both have separate connections to the existing 240 kilovolts (kV) Alberta Interconnected Electrical System. TOWNSHIP ROAD 102 95 AD 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 RO 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 E G TWP10 RGE10 RAN RGE9 RGE8 W4M 93 AD RO 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 E 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 G RAN TOWNSHIP ROAD 100 65 92 48 64 91 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 47 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 110 120 63 Murray 46 90 Lake 108 119 109 61 89 107 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 27 45 62 60 88 106 118 TOWNSHIP ROAD 94 5 44 59 87 105 127 4 117 AD 105 24 19 20 21 22 23 101 RO 24 58 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 12 126 E 43 86 AD G 3 116 RO 104 57 85 E RAN TWP9 G 42 11 115 125 RAN 56 103 94 10 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 AD 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 2 18 138 RO 100 84 114 137 9 41 E G 124 Seven Persons Creek AD TOWNSHIP ROAD 92 RO RAN 0 E 1 8 83 102 136 40 G 1 1 55 D 54 113 135 A 17 RAN 12 7 8 7 9 10 11 12 39 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 101 123 E RO 92 134 16 82 100 NG 6 38 A 53 AD R 22 99 RO 133 E 122 13 15 21 81 G 132 RAN 1 6 5 4 3 20 2 1 6 5 4 98 3 2 1 121 6 5 4 3 14 52 112 131 104 37 51 103 19 36 TOWNSHIP ROAD 90 AD AD TOWNSHIP ROAD 90 RO RO E 97 111 G E 130 G 35 36 RAN 31 32 33 RAN 34 35 36 31 32 33 96 35 36 31 32 33 34 GRANLEA 129 102 SUBSTATION95 128 AD AREA RO 50 E 34 G 80 79 94 33 49 Granlea RAN Reservoir 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 32 93 31 168 TOWNSHIP ROAD 84 30 174 78 167 24 19 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 175 164 76 885 TWP8 77 166 173 k e 29 e 163 r C 165 172 75 n a g i 13 18 17 16 15 e 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 P 162 17 16 15 171 74 TOWNSHIP ROAD 82 72 73 28 71 161 105 170 27 AD 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 RO 9 10 70 158 E 26 G 159 160 169 RAN 25 69 95 101 68 157 AD 24 AD 1 6 5 4 3 RO 2 RO 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 E 156 E G 23 G 67 MALEB RAN RANGE ROAD 94 TOWNSHIP ROAD 80 RAN SUBSTATION EXISTING ALTALINK AREA 66 148 WHITLA SUBSTATION 154 155 k k e e 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 34 r 33 35 36 31 32 33 C n 147 a g i 153 e P 146 140 145 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 139 152 TOWNSHIP ROAD 74 143 144 151 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 142 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 150 40 Mile Coulee Lake TWP7 141 149 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 TOWNSHIP ROAD 72 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 104 AD RO E To Etzikom G RAN 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 TOWNSHIP ROAD 70 TOWNSHIP ROAD 70 Legend Notes 1. All mapped features are approximate and should be used Forty Mile Wind Power Project Proposed Turbine Location Secondary Highway for discussion purposes only. BROOKS 1 Proposed Blade Rotor Area Road ALBERTA Sources Map Extent SASKATCHEWAN Date Created: May 11, 2017 Reference Scale: 1:30,000 Residence Watercourse - Basedata: Government of Alberta - Wind Farm Layout: WSP Canada Inc., 2017 MEDICINE Page Size: 36" x 48" Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12N Project Boundary Waterbody - Basemap: ESRI World Imagery 3 HAT - Inset Map: ESRI World Topographic Map LETHBRIDGE Existing 240 kV Transmission Line Township Boundary 61 2 Proposed Area for Project Collector Quarter Section Boundary 4 CANADA Substation and Temporary 0 1 2 3 U.S.A.
Recommended publications
  • Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas
    Business & Technology Report April 2021 Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Business & Technology Report April 2021 RADWIND PROJECT REPORT SERIES: Use Cases for Distributed Wind in Rural Electric Cooperative Service Areas Prepared By: NRECA Research and project partners. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Wind Energy Technologies Office Award Number DE-EE0008958. Primary Author: Alice Orrell, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NRECA Contacts: Michael Leitman (RADWIND Project Manager) Senior Analyst, Economics & Business NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Venkat Banunarayanan (RADWIND Principal Investigator) Vice President, Integrated Grid NRECA Business and Technology Strategies [email protected] Legal Notices This work contains findings that are general in nature. Readers are reminded to perform due diligence in applying these findings to their specific needs, as it is not possible for NRECA Research to have sufficient understanding of any specific situation to ensure applicability of the findings in all cases. The information in this work is not a recommendation, model, or standard for all electric cooperatives. Electric cooperatives are: (1) independent entities; (2) governed by independent boards of directors; and (3) affected by different member, financial, legal, political, policy, operational, and other considerations. For these reasons, electric cooperatives make independent decisions and investments based upon their individual needs, desires, and constraints. Neither the authors nor NRECA Research assume liability for how readers may use, interpret, or apply the information, analysis, templates, and guidance herein or with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)
    Wind Farms in the United States (excluding California) and Wind Speeds at known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 26 August Contact: Kelsey Wolf-Cloud, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate Note used only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. Total Onshore Total Wind Wind Total Number of Farms in Farms Projected Projected onshore wind farms Country analyzed MW >6.5m/s MW >6.5m/s in country (MWs) (MW) at 15m agl at 20m agl 1,292 104,212 54,627 11,181 22,059 Average Wind Speed Average Average at 20m agl Onshore Wind Farm # of Wind Speed Wind Speed Power (kW) m/s Name Turbines at 80m agl at 15m agl (calculated m/s m/s using wind shear) Foote Creek Rim 82,950 130 12.19 10.93 11.15 Kaheawa II 21,000 14 10.08 8.31 8.58 Rock River 50,000 50 9.7 7.98 8.26 Kaheawa I 30,000 20 9.8 7.97 8.25 Caprock Wind Ranch 80,000 80 9.91 7.7 8.04 Wild Horse 228,600 127 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse 268,200 149 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse II 39,600 22 8.9 7.42 7.66 Pioneer 85,100 46 8.89 7.36 7.60 High Plains 99,000 66 9.07 7.35 7.63 Red Canyon 84,000 56 9.47 7.34 7.66 Auwahi Wind Farm 24,000 8 9.68 7.27 7.63 Blue Canyon II 151,200 84 9.1 7.23 7.53 Blue Canyon 74,250 45 9.04 7.11 7.40 Seven Mile Hill 118,500 79 9.19 7.06 7.39 Glenrock II 99,000 66 9.08 7.05 7.36 McFadden Ridge 28,500 19 8.67 7.05 7.30 High Lonesome 100,000 40 8.36 7 7.20 Hawai Renewable 10,560 16 9.01 6.91 7.24 Happy
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Benefits of Colorado's Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry
    The Economic Benefits of Colorado’s Eastern Plains Renewable Energy Industry July 2020 Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with insightful and strategic consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive custom analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific real estate and business activities and government cost and benefit impacts. • Real Estate and Public Finance Economics Analysis and strategy for infill redevelopment, adaptive reuses, and property development including market and feasibility studies, public investment analysis, and public-private partnering opportunities. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Projects
    A SE SAMPLE PROJECTS Last updated: December 31, 2015 Page 1 of 5 WIND FARM TOWERS Nestor Agbayani has over 25 years of experience in wind farm tower structural engineering consulting and design. The following is a sample of recent wind tower projects for which he served as Engineer of Record, consultant, tower designer, or plan reviewer at Agbayani Structural Engineering (ASE) from the present back to early 2011 or while formerly associated as a Partner at MSKA Structural Engineers. TOTAL RECENT WIND ENERGY PROJECTS: YEAR TOTAL 2015 3705 MW 2013 and 2014 2085 MW 2012 2140 MW 2011 1570 MW 2010 2400 MW 2009 1800 MW 2008 and 2007 2000 MW See the following pages for a detailed list of sample tower projects. AGBAYANI STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TEL: 661-742-1327 TH 1201 24 STREET, SUITE B110-116 EMAIL: [email protected] BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 WEB: www.agbayanistructural.com SAMPLE TOWER PROJECTS Page 2 of 5 Last updated: December 31, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLIENT REPOWER MM92 100M ONTARIO, CANADA DESIGN REUSE REPOWER SYSTEMS INC. NP100 23.4M LATTICE TOWER TEHACHAPI, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW NORTHERN POWER GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW 85M N. KINGSTOWN, RI DESIGN REUSE GOLDWIND USA INC. VESTAS V27/29 31M DESIGN NEW TOWER+FMP FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V47 50M(IA) DESIGN NEW TOWER FREE BREEZE ENERGY VESTAS V82-80M(IIA) CLOVIS, NM DESIGN REUSE VESTAS AWT MITSUBUSHI MWT62 60M(IIA) KERN CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) VESTAS V47 60M(IA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: REVIEW EWINDFARM, INC. NORDEX N90-2.5MW 80M(IA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA NORDEX N100-2.5MW 80M(IIA) CALIFORNIA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW NORDEX USA MITSUBUSHI MWT62 69M(IIA) PALM SPRINGS, CA CONSULTATION: SEISMIC REVIEW TENDERLAND POWER MITSUBUSHI MWT62 47M(S) PALM SPRINGS, CA DESIGN: SEISMIC TOWER TENDERLAND POWER EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLANO CO., CA DESIGN: TURBINE LIGHT SHIELD EDF RE (ENXCO) SUZLON S95-2.1MW 91M(IIA) FORT HAYES, KS CONSULT: FOUNDATION FATIGUE ENVIROTECH CONSULT GOLDWIND G82-1.5MW HAVILAND, OH CONSULT: FIELD ERECTION GOLDWIND USA INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region
    For more information, visit: http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/ windexchange/ 2016 STATE OF WIND DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES BY REGION National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable April 2017 Energy, LLC. TP-5000-67624 • April 2017 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy NREL prints on paper that contains Offi ce of Energy Effi ciency and Renewable Energy recycled content. Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC 2016 State of Wind Development in the United States by Region Ruth Baranowski, Frank Oteri, Ian Baring-Gould, and Suzanne Tegen National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. WE14.BB01 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5000-67624 Golden, CO 80401 April 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    This Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 RESOURCE PLANNING BASICS....................................... 10 DEFINITIONS........................................................................... 10 EXAMPLES OF TRADITIONAL SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES............. 11 EXAMPLES OF RENEWABLE SUPPLY-SIDE RESOURCES.............. 13 PLANNING TOOLS ................................................................... 14 COMPUTER MODELS ............................................................... 17 2.2 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW....................................................... 19 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY CHALLENGES ........................... 19 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND CO2 EMISSIONS..................... 24 FUEL ADEQUACY – NATURAL GAS............................................ 24 FUEL ADEQUACY - COAL ......................................................... 28 STORAGE RESOURCES............................................................ 29 FEDERAL PTC EXTENSION ...................................................... 35 ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS FOR PPAS .............................. 36 REGIONAL AND NATIONAL TRANSMISSION INITIATIVES................ 41 2.3 PUBLIC SERVICE OVERVIEW........................................... 49 SERVICE TERRITORY............................................................... 49 EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ............... 50 OVERVIEW OF THE 2007 ERP ................................................. 51 2020 PUBLIC SERVICE GENERATION SUPPLY MIX ..................... 53 COLORADO TRANSMISSION PLANNING
    [Show full text]