Floristic .And Biosystematic Investigations in Plant Taxonomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Floristic .And Biosystematic Investigations in Plant Taxonomy FLORISTIC .AND BIOSYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATIONS IN PLANT TAXONOMY By LINDA CAROL GATTI CLARK Bachelor of Science University of Central Arkansas Conway, Arkansas 1989 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State Univesity in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1997 ,qci r;, G \1 bfl FLORISTIC AND BIOSYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATIONS IN PLANT TAXONOMY Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS With any of life's meaningful endeavors, one does not walk alone. During the course of this dissertation, a community of individuals shared this journey with me. I extend my gratitude to those individuals who have been extremely supportive and instrumental in helping me reach my goals. I thank my friends, fellow graduate students, and faculty in the Departments of Botany, Physics, and Zoology for their support during this adventure. I aiso express my appreciation to the members of my committee, Drs. Dave Engle, Anne Ewing, and Bill Henley. I am grateful for their advice, support, and assistance during the course of this study. For instilling in me a love and appreciation for plants, I thank my undergraduate adviser and friend, Dr. Donald Culwell of the University of Central Arkansas, Conway. I thank several individuals who aided the projects presented here. For their assistance in plant identification I would like to thank Dr. Ronald J. Tyrl, Patricia Folley and Cheryl McCreary. I wish to thank Dr. Paul Buck for his thorough review of the Asteraceae character list. Words cannot express my sincere appreciation and gratitude toward my mentor and friend, Dr. Ronald J. Tyrl. His guidance, friendship, and support have been invaluable in the realization of this dissertation. I thank him for treating me as colleague, allowing me to experience all the rewards that comes with such responsibility. 111 For their unwavering support, words of encouragement, and love, I would like to thank my parents and in-laws, Joseph and Patricia Gatti, Sue Clark, and Bob and Leanna Clark. This work could not have been possible without the loving support of my family. To my husband, Michael M. Clark, who has offered his unequivocal support to see me achieve my goal and to my daughter, Shelby T. Clark, who has made life a little more interesting along the way, I offer my deepest thanks for their encouragement, understanding, and love. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. ORGANIZATION OF DISSERTATION . 1 PART I: DELTA CHARACTER LIST FOR THE ASTERACEAE OF OKLAHOMA II. INTRODUCTION . 3 III. LITERATURE REVIEW . 5 Ecogeography of Oklahoma and Need for a Modem Taxonomic Treatment . 5 Floristic Work in Oklahoma . 7 Introduction to the Asteraceae. 12 Morphology - Specialized Terminology. 14 Inflorescences . 14 Involucre . 15 Receptacular Bracts . 15 Florets . 15 Pappus . 18 Achenes. 18 Stamens . 19 Styles . 20 Subtribal and Tribal Classification of the Asteraceae . 21 IV. METHODOLOGY . 26 V . RESULTS . 28 VI. LITERATURE CITED . 33 V PART II: MORPHOMETRIC STUDIES OF PAPPOPHORUM SCHREBER (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: PAPPOPHOREAE) VII. MORPHOMETRIC STUDIES OF PAPPOPHORUM SCHREBER (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: P APPOPHOREAE . 39 Introduction . 39 Material & Methods . 41 Results & Discussion. 46 Taxonomy of Pappophorum. 60 Key to Species . 62 Species Descriptions . 63 Literature Cited . 75 PART III: SURVEY OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE BOEHLER SEEPS AND SANDHILLS PRESERVE VIII. SURVEY OF THE VASCULAR OF THE BOEHLER SEEPS AND SANDHILLS PRESERVE . 78 Introduction . 78 Boehler Seeps & Sandhills Preserve . 79 Method of Survey . 81 Flora of the Preserve . 82 References . 84 Appendices APPENDIX A- DELTA-CHARS ... ; . 87 APPENDIX B- DELTA-SPECS. 162 APPENDIX C - DELTA-ITEMS . 165 APPENDIX D - DELTA-TONAT. 167 APPENDIX E - Herbarium Specimens of Pappophorum used for NT-SYS analysis. 169 VI APPENDIX F - Data Sheet used to record 151 morphological features of each specimen of Pappophorum. 202 APPENDIX G - Phenogram resulting from NT-SYS analysis of Pappophorum (51 characters by 676 OTUs). 206 APPENDIX H - Vascular plant collections from Boehler Seeps and Sandhills Preserve arranged alphabetically by species. Collections of L.C. Gatti Clark during the 1994 and 1995 growing seasons . 224 APPENDIX I - Vascular plant collections from Boehler . Seeps and Sandhills Preserve arranged alphabetically by species. Collecitons made by The Nature Conservancy personnel . 232 APPENDIX J - Vascular plant collections made by L.C. Gatti Clark and The Nature Conservancy personnel arranged by family . 236 vu LIST OF TABLES Table Page PART I 1. Individuals producing taxonomic treatments of the flora of Oklahoma . 8 2. Tribes and genera of Oklahoma composites following Bremer's (1994) classification. 13 3. A Comparison of Asteraceae Tribes in Oklahoma: Bentham (1873) vs. Bremer (1994) .....· . 24 PART II 1. Characters emphasized in most recent treatments of Pappophorum (Pensiero 1986, Reeder & Toolin1989, Gatti Clark 1997). • . ......-. 42 2. Morphological characters and character states or numerical units used in NT-SYS analysis of species ofPappophorum ..... 44 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page PART II 1. Simplification of phenogram (Appendix G) showing 7 groups of Pappophorum . 48 2. Portions of phenogram (Appendix G) with OTUs labeled showing clustering of P. vaginatum (VA), P. caespitosum (CA), and P. subbulbosum (SU, UN) . 57 3. Univariate analysis of P. vaginatum (diamond), P. 58 caespitosum, (square) and P. subbulbosum (cross) ........ IX CHAPTER I Organization of Dissertation Plant Taxonomy or Systematics is a multifaceted discipline founded on the understanding and interaction of the many conceptual levels of plant biology. This dissertation summarizes three studies that were selected to expose the investigator to several facets of the discipline. Each part is an independent venture and represents a different type of taxonomic work. In Part I, a DELTA character list is presented. It was produced for the Flora of Oklahoma Project and is to be used for the generation of descriptions of heads for the genera and species of the Asteraceae within Oklahoma. Part II is a morphometric (or numerical-taxonomic) investigation of the species of Pappophorum (Poaceae). Part III describes the results of a floristic survey of the Boehler Seeps and Sandhills Preserve in southeastern Oklahoma. To enhance readability and to facilitate submission for publication, each section or part is complete in itself and written in the format traditionally used in taxonomic journals or floras. It is anticipated that Part I will be incorporated into the Flora of Oklahoma, Part II will be submitted to Systematic Botany, and Part III will be submitted to the Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Sciences. 1 PART I DELTA CHARACTER LIST FOR THE . ASTERACEAE OF OKLAHOMA 2 CHAPTER II Introduction "The family Compositae or Asteraceae has attracted, fascinated and even repelled botanists for over two centuries." V.H. Heywood Oklahoma has tremendous climatic and geological diversity. Twenty­ six geomorphic provinces and 19 land resource areas have been described (Johnson et al., 1979; National Resources Conservation Service, 1992). The state's environmental diversity is reflected in its floristic diversity. Plants characteristic of the Gulf Coastal Plain, Ouachita Uplands, Ozark Plateau, Great Plains, southwestern deserts, and Rocky Mountain foothills can be found within the state. Oklahoma ranks second among all states in the number of vascular plant families with 172 that encompass some 850 genera and 2,600 species (Tyrl et al., 1994). A significant component of this flora is the Asteraceae or composite family. Representing approximately 12-13% of the genera and species in the state, it comprises some 104 genera and 350 species (Waterfall, 1969; Taylor and Taylor, 1994). All taxa exhibit the family's characteristic head inflorescence with its distinctive morphological features. A specialized terminology has evolved to describe the features of the composite head and must be dealt with by the authors of taxonomic manuals such as the forthcoming Flora of Oklahoma. State taxonomists writing this 3 treatise have adopted the use of DELTA (DEscriptive Language for TAxonomy, Dallwitz and Paine, 1986), which is an automated description/identification program that provides a standardized format for taxonomic descriptions by using a coded list of characters. Families such as the Asteraceae require the generation of specific character lists which cover their specialized structures and terminology. The work summarized here was conducted in conjunction with the Flora of Oklahoma Project. The objectives were: 1) to create a DELTA-based character list for the features of the heads of Oklahoma composites, and 2) generate descriptions of the heads of representative genera and species of the family. The products of this research effort -- character list and taxon descriptions -- were submitted to the editorial board of the project for subsequent use by contributing taxonomists. 4 CHAPTER III Literature Review Ecogeography of Oklahoma and Need for a Modern Taxonomic Treatment With respect to climate, geology, geography and topography, Oklahoma is quite diverse. Mean annual temperatures across the state range from 1f. in the south to 14°C at the western end of the Panhandle (Ruffner, 1980 average length of the growing season varies from 168 to 225 dav:c 5e rainfall amounts vary as well, from 142 cm per year in the- ~)'.>""uu~ast to around 38 cm per year at the western end of the Panhandle.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment of Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower)-Derived Ingredients As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Helianthus annuus (Sunflower)-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics Status: Draft Tentative Report for Panel Review Release Date: March 7, 2016 Panel Meeting: March 31-April 1, 2016 The 2016 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is Lillian J. Gill, D.P.A. This report was prepared by Lillian C. Becker, Scientific Analyst/Writer. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20036-4702 ph 202.331.0651 fax 202.331.0088 [email protected] 1 Distributed for comment only -- do not cite or quote Commitment & Credibility since 1976 MEMORANDUM To: CIR Expert Panel and Liaisons From: Lillian C. Becker, M.S. Scientific Analyst and Writer Ivan J. Boyer, PhD, DABT Senior Toxicologist Date: March 7, 2016 Subject: Helianthus annuus (Sunflower)-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics Attached is the tentative report of 13 Helianthus annuus (sunflower)-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics. [Helian122015Rep] All of these ingredients are derived from parts of the Helianathus annuus (sunflower) plant. The sunflower seed oils (with the exception of Ozonized Sunflower Seed Oil) were reviewed in the vegetable- derived oils report and are not included here. In December, 2015, the Panel issued an Insufficient Data Announcement with these data needs: • HRIPT of Hydrogenated Sunflower Seed Extract at 1% or greater • Method of manufacture, including clarification of the source material (whole plant vs “bark”), of Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Extract • Composition of these ingredients, especially protein content (including 2S albumin) Impurities The Council submitted summaries of HRIPTs and use studies of products containing Helianthus annuus (sunflower)-derived ingredients.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2021 Volume 38, Number 4
    April 2021 Volume 38, Number 4 This is an online meeting. We will send you a link the day before the meeting. We will be back with in-person meetings as soon as our venues are open and safe. April 21, 7:00 pm Program Carex By Randy Mears The genus Carex is contained within the Family Cyperaceae (Sedge Family). Ironically, it is one of the least known genera to most people and happens to be the largest genus of flowering plants in the United States with more than 500 species represented. The unifying character of all Carex species is a structure called the perigynium which is a modified scale with fused margins which surrounds the pistillate flowers and is only open at the tip. This structure is paramount for separating all Carex species from one another. There are currently 73 species known to occur within the state of Florida. This presentation will, in large part, be a photographic introduction to most of the species that occur in Florida. Randy Mears is a Florida native born in Plant City. He has been studying Florida native plant species for more than 30 years and has become especially interested in grasses and sedges. He is a wonderful person to have show up a field trip since his knowledge of the sedge- family plants comes with lots of field experience. Randy is a Perigynia on Carex intumescens. Photo by Shirley member of the Suncoast chapter. Denton. 1 Plant Sale at USF Botanical Garden USF again had to cancel its plant sale. We have been invited by the USF Botanical Gardens to have our own Suncoast Chapter plant sale at the botanical gardens on April 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants at the UHCC
    Flora Checklist Texas Institute for Coastal Prairie Research and Education University of Houston Donald Verser created this list by combining lists from studies by Grace and Siemann with the UHCC herbarium list Herbarium Collections Family Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Native Growth Accesion Dates Locality Comments Status Habit Numbers Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis fringeleaf wild petunia N forb 269 10/9/1973 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora violet wild petunia N forb Agavaceae Manfreda virginica false aloe N forb Agavaceae Polianthes sp. polianthes ? forb 130 8/3/1971 2004 roadside Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy N woody/vine Apiaceae Centella erecta Centella asiatica erect centella N forb 36 4/11/2000 Area 2 Apiaceae Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace I forb 139-142 1971 / 72 No collections by Dr. Brown. Perhaps Apiaceae Eryngium leavenworthii Leavenworth's eryngo N forb 144 7/20/1971 wooded area in pipeline ROW E. hookeri instead? Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium button eryngo N forb 77,143,145 71, 72, 2000 Apiaceae Polytaenia texana Polytaenia nuttallii Texas prairie parsley N forb 32 6/6/2002 Apocynaceae Amsonia illustris Ozark bluestar N Forb 76 3/24/2000 Area 4 Apocynaceae Amsonia tabernaemontana eastern bluestar N Forb Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon N woody Asclepiadaceae Asclepias lanceolata fewflower milkweed N Forb Not on Dr. Brown's list. Would be great record. Asclepiadaceae Asclepias longifolia longleaf milkweed N Forb 84 6/7/2000 Area 6 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed N Forb 35 6/7/2002 Area 7 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias viridis green antelopehorn N Forb 63, 92 1974 & 2000 Asteraceae Acmella oppositifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Prairie Dawn-Flower (Hymenoxys Texana) 5-Year Review
    Texas prairie dawn-flower (Hymenoxys texana) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo credit: USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Texas Coastal Ecological Services Field Office Houston, Texas Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 4 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 7 2.4 SYNTHESIS .................................................................................................................. 24 3.0 RESULTS....................................................................................................................... 25 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTIONS.................................................... 26 5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................... 31 Recommendation resulting from the 5-Year Review: .................................................................. 34 Figures Figure 1 Current H. texana county occurrences ............................................................................. 9 Tables Table 1 Renaming of species historically associated with H. texana ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fremontia Journal of the California Native Plant Society
    $10.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1 • SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INSPIRATIONINSPIRATION ANDAND ADVICEADVICE FOR GARDENING VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA WITH NATIVE PLANTS CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] VOL. 40, NO. 3, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013 MEMBERSHIP Membership form located on inside back cover; Copyright © 2013 dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the CNPS Bulletin California Native Plant Society Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Bob Hass, Editor Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 Rob Moore, Contributing Editor Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Cynthia Powell, Cynthia Roye, and CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL Mary Ann Showers, Proofreaders 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 CALIFORNIA NATIVE STAFF – SACRAMENTO CHAPTER COUNCIL PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director: Dan Gluesenkamp David Magney (Chair); Larry Levine Finance and Administration (Vice Chair); Marty Foltyn (Secretary) Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager: Cari Porter Alta Peak (Tulare): Joan Stewart the California Native Flora Membership and Development Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono): Coordinator: Stacey Flowerdew The California Native Plant Society Steve McLaughlin Conservation Program Director: Channel Islands: David Magney (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- Greg Suba zation dedicated to increasing the Rare Plant Botanist: Aaron Sims Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ understanding and appreciation of Vegetation Program Director: Sonoma Coast): Nancy Morin California’s native plants, and to pre- Julie Evens East Bay: Bill Hunt serving them and their natural habitats Vegetation Ecologists: El Dorado: Sue Britting for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]