Beneficial Insects and Spiders of Alaska PMC-10075

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beneficial Insects and Spiders of Alaska PMC-10075 Beneficial Insects and Spiders of Alaska PMC-10075 Cover photos, left to right: Top row: crab spider (Misumena vatia), Dave Guinn; three-banded lady beetle (Coccinella trifasciata perplexa) eating aphids, Aaron Hagerty; green lacewing (Chrysopidae), Dave Guinn Bottom row: parasitoid wasp (Ichneumonidae), Dave Guinn; aerial yellowjacket (Dolichovespula arenaria), Derek Sikes This printing was paid for by the Renewable Resources Extension Act (RREA). www.uaf.edu/ces or 1-877-520-5211 Jessie Moan, Extension Integrated Pest Management Technician. Originally prepared by Michele Hébert, former Extension Agriculture and Horticulture Agent. Published by the University of Alaska Fairbanks Cooperative Extension Service in co- operation with the United States Department of Agriculture. The University of Alaska is an AA/EO employer and educational institution and prohibits illegal discrimina- tion against any individual: www.alaska.edu/nondiscrimination ©2019 University of Alaska Fairbanks. 6-07/MH/9-19 Revised September 2019 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Beneficial Spiders and Their Relatives ................................................................................... 2 Daddy Longlegs or Harvestman (Order: Opiliones) ........................................................... 4 Wolf Spiders (Family: Lycosidae) ........................................................................................... 6 Crab Spiders (Family: Thomisidae) ....................................................................................... 8 Orbweaver Spiders (Family: Araneidae) .............................................................................10 Beneficial Insects: Introduction ............................................................................................12 Damsel Bugs, Nabids (Family: Nabidae) .............................................................................14 Lacewings (Order: Neuroptera) ...........................................................................................16 Ground Beetles (Family: Carabidae) ...................................................................................20 Lady Beetles (Family: Coccinellidae) ..................................................................................22 Flower Flies (Family: Syrphidae) ..........................................................................................26 Robber Flies (Family: Asilidae) ............................................................................................28 Yellowjackets (Family: Vespidae) .........................................................................................30 Parasitoid Wasps (Order: Hymenoptera) ............................................................................32 Parasitoid Flies (Family: Tachinidae)...................................................................................34 Photo Credits ..........................................................................................................................36 Photo Identifications for Known Taxa .................................................................................37 References ................................................................................................................................38 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................39 4 Introduction Gardens and agricultural systems sup- Predators hunt and consume other port a community of small invertebrates, species to survive. Insects may be preda- including pests and their natural enemies. tors in either the immature or adult stage Natural enemies are organisms that act or both. Adult parasitoids deposit eggs in, against other organisms in ways that gen- on or near the body of their host. When erally keep populations below damaging the eggs hatch, the larvae feed on the host’s levels. We consider these natural enemies body while it is still alive and eventually to be beneficial organisms in our environ- cause mortality. Adult parasitoids are ments and an important component of generally free-living, feeding on nectar or integrated pest management strategies. pollen. Pathogens are microorganisms Natural enemies are particularly impor- (fungi, bacteria or viruses) that produce tant in low-input and organic systems, disease and lead to death. where they may be a primary component Additional information on identifica- of a pest management program. tion of beneficial organisms and encourag- Natural enemies can be divided into ing and incorporating them into your pest three broad categories: predators, para- management program is available through sitoids, and pathogens. This booklet will your local Cooperative Extension Service cover common predators and parasitoids. office. 1 Beneficial Spiders and Their Relatives Identification actively pursue prey in a hunting manner. Spiders are characterized by having The spiders outlined in this booklet have four pairs of legs and two body regions, been included because of their likelihood the cephalothorax (head and thorax com- to be present in a garden or crop setting in bined) and abdomen, usually separated by Alaska. Exclusion of any family of spiders a waist constriction. does not indicate their absence from the Spiders are distinguished by spinnerets, state or a lack of beneficial qualities. the silk and web-spinning organs at the Attract spiders by providing a variety rear of the abdomen. Spinnerets may or of plant structures that offer harborage may not be immediately visible on all and habitat for them. spiders. Habits All spiders in Alaska are predators, feeding on insects and other small arthropods. Most spiders are docile and harmless to humans. Some spiders construct webs to ensnare prey; others do not spin webs but 2 Beneficial Spiders and Their Relatives 2 3 1 3 Daddy Longlegs or Harvestman (Order: Opiliones) Identification glands that produce strong-smelling Harvestmen species are not true spi- secretions for defense. They deposit their ders but are close relatives of spiders. They eggs in soil, in cracks or crevices and lack a constricted waist and spinnerets. under bark. Harvestmen have a small, pea-sized There are several harvestman species in body and eight slender legs. Legs can be Alaska; they are most frequently found in either long or short. undisturbed forest sites. The upper surface of the body is usu- ally a mottled grey and brown coloration, while the underside is a cream color. Web Type Harvestmen do not spin a web. Habits Harvestmen are generalist predators, feeding on soft-bodied insects, some beetle larvae, slugs and snails, and decaying organic matter. Harvestmen use special 4 Daddy Longlegs or Harvestman (Order: Opiliones) 4 5 5 Wolf Spiders (Family: Lycosidae) Identification rocks or cracks for retreat, while others are Wolf spiders have highly variable grey found in grass, leaf litter or stony areas. and brown color patterns to match their Female wolf spiders carry egg sacs surroundings. They are mostly moderately under their spinnerets. After hatching, the sized spiders with most being approxi- tiny spiderlings climb onto the abdomen mately one inch in length. of the mother, where they remain for a considerable amount of time. Web Type In Alaska, wolf spiders are encountered around the yard and garden and some- Wolf spiders do not spin webs, but times even in homes. females spin silk to make egg sacs. Attract wolf spiders by maintaining a few permanent plantings. Edging, wooden Habits walkways and mulch also provide shelter. Wolf spiders are fast and are often seen running from disturbances or danger. They have excellent eyesight and are active predators. Some species make tunnels in the ground or use natural depressions such as 6 Wolf Spiders (Family: Lycosidae) 6 7 7 Crab Spiders (Family: Thomisidae) Identification prey on the ground. This family of spiders Crab spiders have their first and second relies more on touch than eyesight to pairs of legs much longer than the last two detect prey. pairs, giving them a crab-like appearance. Some species may slowly change color Their abdomen is often much wider to match their flower perch. than it is high. They are usually light in color and rely on camouflage to hunt. Web Type Crab spiders do not spin webs, snares or nests, but they do spin egg sacs. Habits Crab spiders secure their prey by ambush and stealth and can often be found on flowers in the garden setting. Camouflaged, they lie in wait for prey — sometimes for days. They also stalk their 8 Crab Spiders (Family: Thomisidae) 8 9 9 Orbweaver Spiders (Family: Araneidae) Identification Habits Orbweavers are highly varied in size Orbweavers are most famous for their and coloration. The Alaska example shown web engineering. They and their webs are is a large species with a brightly patterned commonly found on or near plants in the abdomen and distinctive leg markings. garden and on the exteriors of homes and Males are often much smaller than decks. females. With greatly reduced eyes, orbweavers rely on the vibration of the web to indicate Web Type when prey has been captured. Orbweavers are so-named because they Females camouflage egg sacs within the construct a web made up of concentric web or sometimes bury them in leaf duff. circles of silk anchored to the surrounding Members of this group are some of the vegetation. largest spiders likely
Recommended publications
  • Coccinellidae)
    ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR OF THE LADYBIRD BEETLES (COCCINELLIDAE) Edited by I. Hodek, H.E van Emden and A. Honek ©WILEY-BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication CONTENTS Detailed contents, ix 8. NATURAL ENEMIES OF LADYBIRD BEETLES, 375 Contributors, xvii Piotr Ccryngier. Helen E. Roy and Remy L. Poland Preface, xviii 9. COCCINELLIDS AND [ntroduction, xix SEMIOCHEMICALS, 444 ]an Pettcrsson Taxonomic glossary, xx 10. QUANTIFYING THE IMPACT OF 1. PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION, 1 COCCINELLIDS ON THEIR PREY, 465 Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf /. P. Mid'laud and James D. Harwood 2. GENETIC STUDIES, 13 11. COCCINELLIDS IN BIOLOGICAL John J. Sloggett and Alois Honek CONTROL, 488 /. P. Midland 3. LIFE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT, 54 12. RECENT PROGRESS AND POSSIBLE Oldrkli Nedved and Alois Honek FUTURE TRENDS IN THE STUDY OF COCCINELLIDAE, 520 4. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS, 110 Helmut /; van Emden and Ivo Hodek Alois Honek Appendix: List of Genera in Tribes and Subfamilies, 526 5. FOOD RELATIONSHIPS, 141 Ivo Hodek and Edward W. Evans Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf Subject index. 532 6. DIAPAUSE/DORMANCY, 275 Ivo Hodek Colour plate pages fall between pp. 250 and pp. 251 7. INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, 343 Eric Lucas VII DETAILED CONTENTS Contributors, xvii 1.4.9 Coccidulinae. 8 1.4.10 Scymninae. 9 Preface, xviii 1.5 Future Perspectives, 10 References. 10 Introduction, xix Taxonomic glossary, xx 2. GENETIC STUDIES, 13 John J. Sloggett and Alois Honek 1. PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION, 1 2.1 Introduction, 14 Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf 2.2 Genome Size. 14 1.1 Position of the Family. 2 2.3 Chromosomes and Cytology.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Special Report
    COSEWIC Special Report on the List of Prioritized Coccinelidae and Related Groups at Risk in Canada 2012 Funding provided by Environment Canada This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC Special Report on the Changes in the Status and Geographic ranges on the Canadian Lady Beetles Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellinae and the selection of Candidate Species for Risk, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 60 pp. (http://www.cosewic.gc.ca) Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Dr. David B. McCorquodale, Dr. Donna J. Giberson and Meghan Marriott for writing the Special Report on Canadian Lady Beetles, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellinae, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Dr. Paul Catling and Jennifer Heron, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évolution de la situation et de la répartition géographique des coccinelles canadiennes (Coleoptères : Coccinellidés : Coccinellinés) et sélection d’espèces candidates à une évaluation détaillée de situation au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Canadian Lady Beetles — Photo Credit: Acorn 2007. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Recycled paper PREAMBLE This report was commissioned to document changes in geographic ranges of potentially vulnerable native lady beetles (Coccinella novemnotata, C. transversoguttata, Hippodamia hieroglyphica, H. parenthesis, H. tredecimpunctata, Adalia bipunctata and Anatis mali) ; the five most common and widespread non-native lady beetles (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mali Say (1 824), Signaticollis Mulsant (1 850), Non-Ocellate Species As
    A REVIEW OF THE GENUS ANATZS MULSANT (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE)' W. Y. WATSON Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario Abstract Can. Ent. 108: 935-944 (1976) The genus Anatis is reviewed and six species are recognized: ocellata (L.), mali (Say), labiculata (Say), halonis Lewis, rathvoni (Lec.), and lecontei Casey. Relevant illustrations and a key to the species are given. Neotypes for mali and labiculata have been selected. The genus Anatis was first proposed by Mulsant in 1846. Since then it has been accepted by most authors, the important exception being LeConte (1852), who attempted to combine Anatis with Myzia (= Mysia LeConte). With A. ocellata Linnaeus as the type, the following names have been assigned to various members of the genus: quindecimpunctata Say (1 824), mali Say (1824), signaticollis Mulsant (1 850), rathvoni LeConte (1852), canadensis Provancher (1877), halonis Lewis (1896), lecontei Casey (1899), and caseyi Westcott (1912). In addition more than 100 varietal or aberrational names (see Korschefsky, 1932, p. 549 et seq.) have been applied to the various colour phases of ocellata that occur throughout its range in Europe and Asia. The name mobilis McKenzie (1936) refers to a species of Synharmonia and cannot, from the original description, be associated with the genus Anatis. The application of these names has led to some confusion in the ocellate and non-ocellate species of eastern North America. Olivier (1808) described and figured a non-ocellate species as Coccinella quindecimpunctata from specimens that came ostensibly from San Domingo (Dominican Republic) and are therefore only doubtfully associated with continental North America. Recent lists (Blackwelder 1945) of the beetles of the West Indies do not include the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(3): 446–452, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.051 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Effects of diet on development and reproductive fitness of two predatory coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) MOHAMMAD A. MIRHOSSEINI, M. REZA HOSSEINI and M. AMIN JALALI * Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Oenopia conglobata, Cheilomenes sexmaculata, Aphididae, Aphis gossypii, Psyllidae, Agonoscena pistaciae, Ephestia kuehniella eggs, food suitability, life table Abstract. Studies of prey suitability are needed to develop efficient mass rearing programs for generalist predators and to understand their potential contribution to integrated pest management. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the development and repro- ductive success of two predatory coccinellids, Oenopia conglobata (L.) and Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius), reared on diets of the common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer, the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Glover) or a reference diet of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller eggs. Development and reproductive performance of the two coccinellids varied with diet, but egg fertility and immature survival did not. The developmental period (egg-adult) was shortest for both species on A. gossypii. This prey also yielded the shortest preoviposition period and greatest fecundity for C. sexmaculata. The psyllid diet was superior for reproduction in O. conglobata. For both predators, eggs of E. kuehniella were a better diet for development than for reproduction. Life table data indicated that the arboreal O. conglobata was better adapted to A. pistaciae on pistachio trees and might be a more effective biocontrol agent for this pest, despite the fact that C.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinellinae) from Historic
    ASSESSING GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE PATTERNS OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE LADY BEETLES (COCCINELLINAE) FROM HISTORIC OCCURRENCE DATA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Department of Biology Faculty of Science University of Prince Edward Island Meghan Marriott 2012 © S.M. Marriott Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94052-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94052-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinellids As Biological Control Agents of Soft Bodied Insects
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(5): 1362-1373 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Coccinellids as biological control agents of soft JEZS 2017; 5(5): 1362-1373 © 2017 JEZS bodied insects: A review Received: 26-07-2017 Accepted: 27-08-2017 Ajaz Ahmad Kundoo Ajaz Ahmad Kundoo and Akhtar Ali Khan Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Abstract Agricultural Sciences and Ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) are a species-rich, ecologically diverse group of substantial Technology of Kashmir, agricultural significance, inhabit in all types of terrestrial ecosystems. In the present review the biological Shalimar Campus, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India control of soft bodied insects by ladybird beetles is analyzed. The family Coccinellidae comprises 6,000 described species worldwide, of which 90% are considered beneficial predators and is divided into six Akhtar Ali Khan subfamilies: Sticholotidinae, Chilocorinae, Scymninae, Coccidulinae, Coccinellinae and Epilachninae Division of Entomology, although a recent phylogeny suggests a seventh subfamily, Ortaliinae. They have great economic Sher-e-Kashmir University of importance as natural enemies, exhibit a predatory nature against many soft bodied insect pests such as Agricultural Sciences and aphids (Aphididae: Homoptera), scale insects and mealy bugs (coccoidea: Homoptera), whiteflies Technology of Kashmir, (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera), Thrips (Thripidae: Thysanoptera), jassids (Cicadellidae: Homoptera), psyllids Shalimar Campus, Srinagar, (Psyllidae; Homoptera), small larvae, insect eggs, and phytophagous mites. These have been used in both Jammu and Kashmir, India classical and augmentative biological control programmes and are also considered important in conservation biological control programmes. They are of high priority in organic cropping and integrated pest management systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking List
    Tracked Taxa List: Current as of Invertebrates 2021-May-17 This list contains the tracked invertebrate animal taxa known by the Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre (SKCDC) to occur within Saskatchewan, as of the date provided above. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact [email protected]. For more information about how the SKCDC generates these lists and what determines when a species is tracked by the SKCDC, visit: http://biodiversity.sk.ca/lists.htm Conservation ranks/status are provided for each species. For details on each, refer to the following resources: ◦ Subnational (S), National (N) and Global (G) Ranks: www.biodiversity.sk.ca/ranking.htm ◦ Government of Saskatchewan Wild Species at Risk Regulations: https://publications.saskatchewan.ca/#/products/1609 ◦ COSEWIC: https://www.cosewic.ca/index.php ◦ SARA; Government of Canada Species at Risk public registry: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html SYNONYMS: This list is being provided by the SKCDC as a tool to facilitate users in determining the current, accepted taxonomy. If a name is currently out of use in Saskatchewan, it’s current synonym is provided, indented in the line below the accepted name. In this row, we are unable to distinguish between true synonyms and misapplied names used as synonyms. For example, Cryptantha fendleri is an accepted name for a vascular plant that is currently found in Saskatchewan. This name, however, has also been misapplied to both Cryptantha kelseyana and Cryptantha minima in the past. Therefore, it appears as a synonym to those two species.
    [Show full text]
  • Weighty Matters: Body Size, Diet and Specialization in Aphidophagous Ladybird Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
    REVIEW Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 381–389, 2008 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1341 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Weighty matters: Body size, diet and specialization in aphidophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) JOHN J. SLOGGETT Tussen Beide Markten 45, 9712 CC Groningen, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Body size, prey size, prey density, capture efficiency, dietary breadth, specialization, Coccinellidae, aphids Abstract. Aphidophagous ladybirds exhibit a broad range of body sizes. Until now this has been thought to be a function of the dif- ferent prey densities that they feed at, with smaller ladybirds feeding at lower prey densities. The size of the prey species they feed on has been considered to have no relationship with ladybird body size. However, these arguments possess a limited capacity to explain observed data from the field. I here demonstrate a more realistic, complex approach incorporating both prey density and the size of prey species. Small ladybirds can feed on small aphids at both low and high densities. However when the aphid species is large they cannot catch the older, bigger, more energy-rich aphid instars due to their small size. They are thus unable to feed on large aphid prey at low densities, although at higher densities numbers of the smaller instars may be sufficient to sustain them. By contrast large ladybirds can feed on large aphids at both low and high densities due to their superior ability to catch the bigger, more energy- rich older aphids; however they cannot be sustained by low densities of small aphids due to food limitation consequent on their large size.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 December 2020 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service, [email protected] Bill Ruesink [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Haack, Robert A. and Ruesink, Bill 2020. "Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Haack and Ruesink: Coleoptera Collected at Grass River Natural Area 138 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 53, Nos. 3–4 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack1, * and William G. Ruesink2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 (emeritus) 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 (emeritus) * Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Overall, 409 Coleoptera species (369 identified to species, 24 to genus only, and 16 to subfamily only), representing 275 genera and 58 beetle families, were collected from late May through late September 2017 at the Grass River Natural Area (GRNA), Antrim Coun- ty, Michigan, using baited multi-funnel traps (210 species), pitfall traps (104 species), and sweep nets (168 species).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Look for Lady Beetles / Comment Trouver La Coccinelle
    Field Guide LADY BEETLES of the Northwest Territories LES COCCINELLES des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Guide d’identification If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. Tłı̨chǫ Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı. Chipewyan Edı gondı dehgáh got’ı̨e zhatıé k’ę́ę́ edatł’éh enahddhę nıde naxets’ę́ edahłı.́ South Slavey K’áhshó got’ı̨ne xǝdǝ k’é hederı ɂedı̨htl’é yerınıwę nı ́dé dúle. North Slavey Jii gwandak izhii ginjìk vat’atr’ijąhch’uu zhit yinohthan jì’, diits’àt ginohkhìi. Gwich’in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Aboriginal Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree This identification guide includes all species of lady beetles (Family Coccinellidae) known to be Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. present in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Tłı̨chǫ ©Recommended 2018 Government citation: of the Northwest Territories Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers of Coleoptera*
    CHROMOSOME NUMBERS OF COLEOPTERA* STANLEY G. SMITH Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Received 7.vi.52 THE present is a complete list of the chromosome numbers of Coleoptera. That in Makino's (I95I) An Atlas of the Chromosome Numbers in Animals is replete with errors : not in the numbers themselves -almost without exception, these have been faithfully recorded from the originals-but in the spelling of the specific, generic, and family names, as well as in the nomenclature and systematic disposition of many of the species. f Considering the difficulties with which Makino was faced, the coverage of the literature is good, perhaps no more than I4 determinations by nine authors being omitted. I had earlier intended to compile a list of some I6o chromosome determinations, which I have made as time permitted during the course of the past eight years, together with others that have appeared in print, and to publish them as a supplement bringing those given by Harvey (Igi6 and Ig2o) up to date, but it now appears that a complete revision of Makino's list is warranted. It is perhaps note­ worthy that II families find themselves represented for the first time and that the total of cytologically known Coleoptera now reaches 340. According to Makino's tabulation, this number is surpassed among Insecta only in the Orthoptera and Heteroptera but in no other animal group, and constitutes approximately IO per cent. of the species of animals whose chromosome numbers have been recorded. The distribution of species, genera, subfamilies, and families by haploid number of autosomes and by sex-chromosome type is given graphically in fig.
    [Show full text]