Carpet Monsters and Killer Spores: a Natural History of Toxic Mold

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carpet Monsters and Killer Spores: a Natural History of Toxic Mold Carpet Monsters and Killer Spores: A Natural History of Toxic Mold Nicholas P. Money OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Carpet Monsters and Killer Spores This page intentionally left blank CARPET MONSTERS AND KILLER SPORES A NATURAL HISTORY OF TOXIC MOLD Nicholas P. Money 1 2004 1 Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Sa˜o Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto Copyright � 2004 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Money, Nicholas P. Carpet Monsters and killer spores : a natural history of toxic mold / Nicholas P. Money. p. cm. ISBN 0-19-517227-2 1. Molds (Fungi)—Control. 2. Molds (Fungi)—Health aspects. 3. Indoor air pollution. 4. Dampness in buildings. 5. Dwellings—Maintenance and repair. I. Title. TH9035.M65 2004 648'.7—dc22 2003064709 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For Allison, my stepdaughter This page intentionally left blank Preface My colleague Jerry McClure was featured in the preface to my first book, Mr. Bloomfield’s Orchard, but I didn’t expect he’d make his way into this one. Jerry has a knack, however, for saying the right thing at the right time. Passing me in the hallway outside my lab last year, he greeted me by saying, “You’re in the wrong business.” This was a little unsettling, because I’d always thought of him as a supporter. Then he explained, “You could be making millions from black mold.” I didn’t think much about this pearl of Texas wisdom at the time, but it festered in my subconscious until my publisher asked me if I knew anything about indoor molds. Bowing to the lobbyists, I put aside my research for a bestseller on the organisms that squirm in the foul pond in my backyard and set off in search of indoor molds. Few Americans can be unaware of the toxic mold crisis and the crisis of toxic mold lawsuits. The ravages of the mold Stachybotrys, and the ensuing legal battles between residents of sick houses, par- ents with sick children, building contractors, landlords, and insur- ance companies, are regularly showcased in newspapers and on tele- vision programs. As a mycologist, I had read about cases of mold-related illness long before Jerry McClure’s interjection, and had even earned a few car payments by consulting on mold prob- lems, but none of this had captured my interest until a black mold attacked my wife. I had bought Diana a gift box of hand lotion, soap, and lip balm that trumpeted an all-natural, no-preservative pedigree. She loved the lip balm and took the little jar of the stuff with us to Norway in the summer of 2002 and used it every day. And then her head exploded in the bathroom, blackening the mirror with soot— not quite. First, her lips tingled; then, a few days later, they became inflamed every time she applied the gel. She stopped using the balm but packed it back to Ohio. Getting ready for work one morning, she opened the jar and was alarmed by the discovery that the balm had turned jet black. Being a science nerd, she guessed what had happened. A microscopic mold was eating the fat molecules in the cosmetic. Looking at the black stuff under the microscope, the identity of the fungus was clear: Aspergillus niger. This is a common micro- organism that forms masses of spores at the tips of stalks. Each stalk looks like a brush, which gives the fungus its name: An aspergillum is a special brush used to sprinkle holy water. Aspergillus niger can cause serious infections, particularly in patients whose immune de- fenses have been compromised by viral infections such as HIV, by cancer therapy, or by the anti-rejection drug regimens after an organ transplant. A few strains of this mold also produce toxins, but Diana survived the encounter with nothing worse than the knowledge that she had been smearing allergenic spores on her lips. Like the media darling Stachybotrys, Aspergillus niger qualifies as a black mold because it is a microscopic fungus whose spores are painted with melanin. There are a few thousand species of these fungi and, in all likelihood, millions of distinct varieties or strains, each with their own genetic and biochemical character. They con- sume almost every kind of substance produced by plants and ani- mals, which, if you think about it, includes most of the stuff we eat and many of the things used to construct a building. The diet of molds evolved over hundreds of millions of years, and far from evicting fungi, humans have only succeeded in broadening the range of food materials available for fungi by developing crops, transform- ing trees into paper products, and creating synthetic materials such as plastics, lubricants in machines, and fabrics. Any attempt to com- Preface viii pletely oust fungi from the indoor environment, or from any other place, is futile. Negative consequences of interactions between molds and hu- mans—as well as all of the positive ones—have been recognized for a long time. For instance, Stachybotrys was first identified in 1837. But widespread fears about black-mold toxins are a product of the new millennium and deserve a critical, balanced, scientific inquiry. Though I cannot promise anything that boring, I do hope I can dispel some of the media myths about these microorganisms while identifying the real threat that can be posed by a few of these fungi. Beyond black molds, other fungi are lurking in our basements, spe- cies that may someday replace Stachybotrys & Company as the new menace, a cash cow for the legal profession and a bane of insurers. These beasts will be featured in the final chapter. The target audience for this book includes three groups of po- tential readers. First and foremost, I hope that anyone interested in the safety of their homes will find this book helpful in understanding the science behind the hysteria. Those in the legal profession and insurance industry are a second audience. Whether you are arguing for or against those who claim to have been victimized by mold, you will find some useful quotes. Finally, as a scientist, I enjoy writ- ing for other scientists and shall use this book project to further explore the biology of the fungi. For the reader(s) who enjoyed Mr. Bloomfield’s Orchard,I should mention that I’m back in my writing shed, a couple of years older, definitively no wiser. This is a genuine preface, in the sense that it was written in advance of any of the chapters. This done, all that remains is to indulge in serious caffeine abuse for a few months and get the rest into my computer before the molds, or their attor- neys, get to me. Now that the book is written, I wish to thank everyone who responded to my barrage of e-mails and phone calls. The following people deserve special mention for indulging my queries: Luis De La Cruz, Dorr Dearborn, Richard Haugland, Steve Moss, Ian Ross, Steve Vesper, and Mike Vincent. I also thank my editors Diana Da- vis, Kirk Jensen, and Niko Pfund. Nicholas P. Money Oxford, Ohio October 2003 Preface ix This page intentionally left blank Contents 1 Stachybotrys versus Superpower 3 2 Uninvited Guests 23 3 Carpet Monsters 41 4 Mycological Warfare 58 5 Cleveland Revisited 77 6 Your Verdict, Please 94 7 Everlasting Strife 112 8 A Plague upon Your House 127 Notes 143 Appendix: Mold Resources on the Internet 167 Glossary 169 Index 173 This page intentionally left blank Carpet Monsters and Killer Spores This page intentionally left blank If you have found where you were exposed to toxic mold, you will need to find the responsible parties (if any) who are capable of paying. —http://www.toxic-mold-stachybotrys.com (2002) Stachybotrys versus Superpower am deeply in love with fungi, enough to Icloister myself in a backyard shed for an en- tire year, through freeze and broil, to publicize their charms in Mr. Bloomfield’s Orchard. So just as someone must be very bad if their mother says so, my opening statement should carry some weight. Some molds can be our enemies. Black-colored ones have been in the news a lot lately. They invade our homes, provoke allergies in millions of peo- ple, are implicated in a lethal respiratory illness in babies, and are a potential source of biological warfare agents. This is their story. Go make some tea. This will take a while. Once upon a time, hundreds of millions of years ago, micro- scopic fungi figured out how to decompose plant and animal tissues. Hundreds of millions of years later, Homo sapiens evolved and learned how to construct shelters from leaves, branches, and animal hides. The fungi grew on the first midden assembled by very proud and very hairy Adam and Eve, but this didn’t concern the newly- weds because the roofing and walls were easily replaced once they began to rot. The rare asthmatic child in those days was severely challenged by this intimate association with the fungi, but with 3 thousands of years to go before the invention of bronchodilating inhalers, the little chap wheezed himself to death before he could reproduce, preventing the spread of his asthmatic genes.
Recommended publications
  • Mycologist News
    MYCOLOGIST NEWS The newsletter of the British Mycological Society 2012 (4) Edited by Prof. Pieter van West and Dr Anpu Varghese 2013 BMS Council BMS Council and Committee Members 2013 President Prof. Geoffrey D. Robson Vice-President Prof. Bruce Ing President Elect Prof Nick Read Treasurer Prof. Geoff M Gadd Secretary Position vacant Publications Officer Dr. Pieter van West International Initiatives Adviser Prof. AJ Whalley Fungal Biology Research Committee representatives: Dr. Elaine Bignell; Prof Nick Read Fungal Education and Outreach Committee: Dr. Paul S. Dyer; Dr Ali Ashby Field Mycology and Conservation: Dr. Stuart Skeates, Mrs Dinah Griffin Fungal Biology Research Committee Prof. Nick Read (Chair) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Mark Ramsdale retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Pieter van West retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Sue Crosthwaite retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof. Mick Tuite retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr Alex Brand retiring 31.12. 2015 Fungal Education and Outreach Committee Dr. Paul S. Dyer (Chair and FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Ali Ashby retiring 31.12. 2013 Ms. Carol Hobart (FMC link) retiring 31.12. 2012 Dr. Sue Assinder retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Kay Yeoman retiring 31.12. 2013 Alan Williams retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Lynne Boddy (Media Liaison) retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2015 Field Mycology and Conservation Committee Dr. Stuart Skeates (Chair, website & FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Richard Fortey retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs. Sheila Spence retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs Dinah Griffin retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gasteroid Mycobiota (Agaricales, Geastrales, And
    Gasteroid mycobiota ( Agaricales , Geastrales , and Phallales ) from Espinal forests in Argentina 1,* 2 MARÍA L. HERNÁNDEZ CAFFOT , XIMENA A. BROIERO , MARÍA E. 2 2 3 FERNÁNDEZ , LEDA SILVERA RUIZ , ESTEBAN M. CRESPO , EDUARDO R. 1 NOUHRA 1 Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, CONICET–Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CC 495, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina. 2 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina. 3 Cátedra de Diversidad Vegetal I, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia., Universidad Nacional de San Luis, CP 5700 San Luis, Argentina. CORRESPONDENCE TO : [email protected] *CURRENT ADDRESS : Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Jujuy (CIT-JUJUY), CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, CP 4600, San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, Argentina. ABSTRACT — Sampling and analysis of gasteroid agaricomycete species ( Phallomycetidae and Agaricomycetidae ) associated with relicts of native Espinal forests in the southeast region of Córdoba, Argentina, have identified twenty-nine species in fourteen genera: Bovista (4), Calvatia (2), Cyathus (1), Disciseda (4), Geastrum (7), Itajahya (1), Lycoperdon (2), Lysurus (2), Morganella (1), Mycenastrum (1), Myriostoma (1), Sphaerobolus (1), Tulostoma (1), and Vascellum (1). The gasteroid species from the sampled Espinal forests showed an overall similarity with those recorded from neighboring phytogeographic regions; however, a new species of Lysurus was found and is briefly described, and Bovista coprophila is a new record for Argentina. KEY WORDS — Agaricomycetidae , fungal distribution, native woodlands, Phallomycetidae . Introduction The Espinal Phytogeographic Province is a transitional ecosystem between the Pampeana, the Chaqueña, and the Monte Phytogeographic Provinces in Argentina (Cabrera 1971). The Espinal forests, mainly dominated by Prosopis L.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Mexicana De Micolog{A 13: 12-27, 1997 IMAGENES Y
    Revista Mexicana de Micolog{a 13: 12-27, 1997 IMAGENES Y PALABRAS, UNA DUALIDAD DINAMICA DE LA COMUNICACION CIENTIFICA MIGUEL ULLOA Departamento de Botanica, Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Aut6noma de Mexico Apartado Postal70-233, Mexico, D. F. 04510 [email protected] ABSTRACT IMAGES AND WORDS, A DINAMYC DUALITY FOR SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION. Rev. Mex. Mic. 13: 12-27 (1997). This communication deals with a topic which has always attracted the interest of the author: the usage of inwges and words in human communication, particularly in his scientific endeavour. It presents some historical and anthropological data in order to point out briefly that images, expresed in the way of sculptures, engravings, and paintings, are as old as man itself, much older than communication by means of writing. The core of the work focuses on the evolution undergone by the duality images-words in the mycological field; it does not pretend to cover the whole theme, but gives information about the first naturalistic illustrations of fungi, the development in drawing and printing techniques, the surging of instruments as fundamental as the microscope and telescope, which allowed a better observation by naturalists and scientists, and the invention of photography, advances that produced a tremendous impact in the development of both microbiology and mycology. Along the technical progress related with the observation, registration, and interpretation of images, it was created an ex tense terminology used to transmit this scientific knowledge. Key words: images, words, scientific communication. RESUMEN Esta comunicaci6n aborda un tema que siempre ha atrafdo el interes del autor: el empleo de imagenes y pa/abras en Ia comunicaci6n humana, particularmente en el quehacer cientffico de su competencia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of the Genus Ramaria Inferred from Nuclear Large Subunit And
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Andrea J. Humpert for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on November 11, 1999. Title: Systematics of the Genus Ramaria Inferred from Nuclear Large Subunit and Mitochondrial Small Subunit Ribosomal DNA Sequences. Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Joseph W. Spatafora Ramaria is a genus of epigeous fungi common to the coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest of North America. The extensively branched basidiocarps and the positive chemical reaction of the context in ferric sulfate are distinguishing characteristics of the genus. The genus is estimated to contain between 200-300 species and is divided into four subgenera, i.) R. subgenus Ramaria, ii.) R. subgenus Laeticolora, iii.) R. subgenus Lentoramaria and iv.) R. subgenus Echinoramaria, according to macroscopic, microscopic and macrochemical characters. The systematics of Ramaria is problematic and confounded by intraspecific and possibly ontogenetic variation in several morphological traits. To test generic and intrageneric taxonomic classifications, two gene regions were sequenced and subjected to maximum parsimony analyses. The nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA (nuc LSU rDNA) was used to test and refine generic, subgeneric and selected species concepts of Ramaria and the mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mt SSU rDNA) was used as an independent locus to test the monophyly of Ramaria. Cladistic analyses of both loci indicated that Ramaria is paraphyletic due to several non-ramarioid taxa nested within the genus including Clavariadelphus, Gautieria, Gomphus and Kavinia. In the nuc LSU rDNA analyses, R. subgenus Ramaria species formed a monophyletic Glade and were indicated for the first time to be a sister group to Gautieria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Lower Organisms
    The Classification of Lower Organisms Ernst Hkinrich Haickei, in 1874 From Rolschc (1906). By permission of Macrae Smith Company. C f3 The Classification of LOWER ORGANISMS By HERBERT FAULKNER COPELAND \ PACIFIC ^.,^,kfi^..^ BOOKS PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Copyright 1956 by Herbert F. Copeland Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 56-7944 Published by PACIFIC BOOKS Palo Alto, California Printed and bound in the United States of America CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. An Essay on Nomenclature 6 III. Kingdom Mychota 12 Phylum Archezoa 17 Class 1. Schizophyta 18 Order 1. Schizosporea 18 Order 2. Actinomycetalea 24 Order 3. Caulobacterialea 25 Class 2. Myxoschizomycetes 27 Order 1. Myxobactralea 27 Order 2. Spirochaetalea 28 Class 3. Archiplastidea 29 Order 1. Rhodobacteria 31 Order 2. Sphaerotilalea 33 Order 3. Coccogonea 33 Order 4. Gloiophycea 33 IV. Kingdom Protoctista 37 V. Phylum Rhodophyta 40 Class 1. Bangialea 41 Order Bangiacea 41 Class 2. Heterocarpea 44 Order 1. Cryptospermea 47 Order 2. Sphaerococcoidea 47 Order 3. Gelidialea 49 Order 4. Furccllariea 50 Order 5. Coeloblastea 51 Order 6. Floridea 51 VI. Phylum Phaeophyta 53 Class 1. Heterokonta 55 Order 1. Ochromonadalea 57 Order 2. Silicoflagellata 61 Order 3. Vaucheriacea 63 Order 4. Choanoflagellata 67 Order 5. Hyphochytrialea 69 Class 2. Bacillariacea 69 Order 1. Disciformia 73 Order 2. Diatomea 74 Class 3. Oomycetes 76 Order 1. Saprolegnina 77 Order 2. Peronosporina 80 Order 3. Lagenidialea 81 Class 4. Melanophycea 82 Order 1 . Phaeozoosporea 86 Order 2. Sphacelarialea 86 Order 3. Dictyotea 86 Order 4. Sporochnoidea 87 V ly Chapter Page Orders. Cutlerialea 88 Order 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Some Gasteromycetes
    FUNGI FROM THE DJA BIOSPHERE RESERVE (CAMEROON). NOTES ON SOME GASTEROMYCETES by F.D. CALONGE & P.P. DANIELS Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Plaza de Murillo, 2. 28014 Madrid (Spain) Summary. CALONGE, F.D. & P.P. DANIELS (1998). Fungi from the Dja Biosphere Reserve (Cameroon). Notes on sorne Gasteromycetes. Bo!. Soco Mico!. Madrid 23: 171-174. Four species of Gasteromycetes collected in the Biosphere Reserve of Dja (Cameroon), are briefly described and commented. Two of them: Cyathus striatus and Sphaerobolus stellatus are well-known in Europe, being cosmopolitan, and the other two: Geastrum schweinitzii varo stipitatum and Phallus indusiatus show a typical pantropical distribution. Key words: Gasteromycetes, taxonomy, ecology, chorology, Cameroon, Central Africa. Resumen. CALONGE, F.D. & P.P. DANIELS (1998). Hongos de la Reserva de la Biosfera del Dja (Camerún). Notas sobre algunos Gasteromycetes. Bol. Soco Mico!. Madrid 23: 171-174. Se describen y comentan cuatro especies de Gasteromycetes recolectados en la Reserva de la Biosfera del Dja (Camerún). Dos de ellos, Cyathus striatus y Sphaerobolus stellatus, son cosmopolitas y bien conocidos en Europa, mientras que los otros dos, Geastrum schweinitzii varo stipitatum y Phallus indusiatus, presentan distribución típica pantropical. Palabras clave: Gasteromycetes, taxonomía, ecología, corología, Camerún, África Central. INTRODUCTION In 1997, one of us (P.P.D.), spent a month in the Dja Biosphere Reserve and had the opportunity to collect a series of fungi belonging to different groups. Among the species collected there were four Gasteromycetes, two of which show a chorological interest. Thus, we decided to publish a short note on them to contribute to a better knowledge on these fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Gilled Mushrooms and Puffballs Inferred from Ribosomal DNA Sequences
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 12002–12006, October 1997 Evolution Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences DAVID S. HIBBETT*†,ELIZABETH M. PINE*, EWALD LANGER‡,GITTA LANGER‡, AND MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE* *Harvard University Herbaria, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and ‡Eberhard–Karls–Universita¨t Tu¨bingen, Spezielle BotanikyMykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tu¨bingen, Germany Communicated by Andrew H. Knoll, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, August 11, 1997 (received for review May 12, 1997) ABSTRACT Homobasidiomycete fungi display many bearing structures (the hymenophore). All fungi that produce complex fruiting body morphologies, including mushrooms spores on an exposed hymenophore were grouped in the class and puffballs, but their anatomical simplicity has confounded Hymenomycetes, which contained two orders: Agaricales, for efforts to understand the evolution of these forms. We per- gilled mushrooms, and Aphyllophorales, for polypores, formed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of homobasi- toothed fungi, coral fungi, and resupinate, crust-like forms. diomycetes, using sequences from nuclear and mitochondrial Puffballs, and all other fungi with enclosed hymenophores, ribosomal DNA, with an emphasis on understanding evolu- were placed in the class Gasteromycetes. Anatomical studies tionary relationships of gilled mushrooms and puffballs. since the late 19th century have suggested that this traditional Parsimony-based
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICATION of the ARTILLERY FUNGUS, Sphaerobolus Spp
    Dr. Sharon M. Douglas Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 123 Huntington Street, P. O. Box 1106 New Haven, CT 06504 Phone: (203) 974-8601 Fax: (203) 974-8502 Founded in 1875 Email: [email protected] Putting science to work for society Website: www.ct.gov/caes CLASSIFICATION OF THE ARTILLERY FUNGUS, Sphaerobolus spp. The taxonomy or “classification” of the not able to make their own food). When artillery fungus, Sphaerobolus spp., is used as a common term, “fungus” can be difficult to define using common terms. Is it used to include a mold, mildew, rust, a mold? Is it a mildew? Is it a fungus? The smut, mushroom, or yeast. answer really depends on whether you ask a scientist or a nonexpert because of the Other common terms, specifically mold and differences in the terms that are used. Many mildew, are often used interchangeably. house insurance policies have different They can have scientific, non-scientific, or types of wording for clauses that involve generic definitions. As a consequence, they damage associated with fungi. Examples can be used to describe a variety of very include dry rot, mold, and mildew. Because different types of organisms and can be of the intermixing of scientific and non- ambiguous. scientific terms, it often comes down to a matter of interpretation when determining • Mold- The common use of this term what is and what is not covered by a refers to a type of organism that usually homeowner’s policy. produces conspicuous, profuse, or woolly, superficial growth on a variety of substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • <I> Peziza Arvernensis, P. Pseudovesiculosa
    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 © 2016. Mycotaxon, Ltd. October–December 2016—Volume 131, pp. 827–839 http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/131.827 Morphological and phylogenetic clarification of Peziza arvernensis, P. pseudovesiculosa, P. pseudosylvestris, and P. domiciliana Angela Lantieri1*, Gianfranco Medardi2 & Pablo Alvarado3 1Via Novaluce 38, I-95030 Tremestieri Etneo (Catania), Italy 2Via Giuseppe Mazzini 21, I-25086 Rezzato (Brescia), Italy 4ALVALAB, La Rochela 47, 39012 Santander, Spain * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—The concepts of the morphologically similar species Peziza arvernensis, P. pseudovesiculosa, P. pseudosylvestris, and P. domiciliana are revisited in light of new morphological and molecular data from freshly collected and herbarium specimens. Phylogenetic inference based on ITS nrDNA sequences suggests that P. arvernensis, P. pseudovesiculosa, and P. pseudosylvestris are monophyletic and that P. domiciliana represents an independent taxon. Key words—Pezizales, taxonomy Introduction The distinction between Peziza arvernensis (subject of previous phylogenetic studies by Norman & Egger 1999 and Hansen et al. 2001, 2002), P. pseudovesiculosa [≡ Aleuria amplissima Boud.], P. pseudosylvestris [≡ Galactinia pseudosylvestris], and P. domiciliana is controversial because macro– and microscopic morphological characters seem insufficient to unambiguously define these taxa. Moreover, despite our several requests for samples of P. pseudovesiculosa and P. pseudosylvestris to institutional and private herbaria, we were able to obtain and examine only a few collections under these names. Furthermore, P. pseudovesiculosa and P. pseudosylvestris are inadequately described (Gamundí 1975; Donadini 1977, 1978, 1979; Gamundí & Giaiotti 1998; Baiano et al. 2000; Moyne 2008). The two species seem to differ from 828 ... Lantieri, Medardi & Alvarado P. arvernensis primarily in the thickness of the layers of the excipulum, while all other characters overlap among the three species.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Macrofungi in Four National Capital Region Network Parks
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Macrofungi in Four National Capital Region Network Parks Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCRN/NRTR—2007/056 ON THE COVER Penn State Mont Alto student Cristie Shull photographing a cracked cap polypore (Phellinus rimosus) on a black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), Antietam National Battlefield, MD. Photograph by: Elizabeth Brantley, Penn State Mont Alto Inventory of Macrofungi in Four National Capital Region Network Parks Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCRN/NRTR—2007/056 Lauraine K. Hawkins and Elizabeth A. Brantley Penn State Mont Alto 1 Campus Drive Mont Alto, PA 17237-9700 September 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphaerobolus SPP-Classification
    Dr. Sharon M. Douglas Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 123 Huntington Street, P. O. Box 1106 New Haven, CT 06504 Phone: (203) 974-8601 Fax: (203) 974-8502 Founded in 1875 Email: [email protected] Putting science to work for society Website: www.ct.gov/caes CLASSIFICATION OF THE ARTILLERY FUNGUS, Sphaerobolus spp. The taxonomy or “classification” of the not able to make their own food). When artillery fungus, Sphaerobolus spp., is used as a common term, “fungus” can be difficult to define using common terms. Is it used to include a mold, mildew, rust, a mold? Is it a mildew? Is it a fungus? The smut, mushroom, or yeast. answer really depends on whether you ask a scientist or a nonexpert because of the Other common terms, specifically mold and differences in the terms that are used. Many mildew, are often used interchangeably. house insurance policies have different They can have scientific, non-scientific, or types of wording for clauses that involve generic definitions. As a consequence, they damage associated with fungi. Examples can be used to describe a variety of very include dry rot, mold, and mildew. Because different types of organisms and can be of the intermixing of scientific and non- ambiguous. scientific terms, it often comes down to a matter of interpretation when determining • Mold- The common use of this term what is and what is not covered by a refers to a type of organism that usually homeowner’s policy. produces conspicuous, profuse, or woolly, superficial growth on a variety of substrates.
    [Show full text]