MARVIN ROWLEY Family History and Management of the OSU Research Forests Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1986 Oral History Interviews by Royal G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MARVIN ROWLEY Family History and Management of the OSU Research Forests Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1986 Oral History Interviews by Royal G MARVIN ROWLEY Family History and Management of the OSU Research Forests Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1986 Oral History Interviews by Royal G. Jackson, Jennifer Lee, and Bob Zybach Soap Creek Valley History Project OSU Research Forests Monograph #15 SOAP CREEK VALLEY, OREGON, ORAL HISTORY SERIES Monograph #1: Lorna Grabe. Family History and the Story of the Soap Creek Schoolhouse Foundation, Benton County, Oregon. Monograph #2: Paul M. Dunn. Biographical Sketch and Story of the Adair Tract, Benton County, Oregon. Monograph #3: Donald Dickey. Family History and Life on Berry Creek, Benton County, Oregon: 1928–1942. Monograph #4: Edward Sekermestrovich. Life at CCC Camp Arboretum, Benton County, Oregon: 1935–1940. Monograph #5: John Jacob & Wilma Rohner. Family Farming on Coffin Butte between World Wars, Benton County, Oregon: 1919–1941. Monograph #6: James Hanish. Biographical Sketch and a Tour of Berry Creek, Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1930–1938. Monograph #7: Charlie Olson. Biographical Sketch and Early History of Sulphur Springs, Benton County, Oregon: 1900–1920. Monograph #8: Neil Vanderburg. Family Farming and Saw Milling on Berry Creek, Benton County, Oregon: 1935–1941. Monograph #9: Eugene Glender. Growing up on a Tampico Family Farm, Benton County, Oregon: 1910–1941. Monograph #10: Velma Carter Rawie. A History of the Carter Family and the Town of Wells, Benton County, Oregon: 1845–1941. Monograph #11: Bessie Murphy. Botanizing in Benton County, Oregon: 1900–1991. Monograph #12: Wanda Marcks Cook. The Story of the Sulphur Springs Stock Ranch, Benton County, Oregon: 1904–1939. Monograph #13: William A. Davies. Biographical Sketch and Management of OSU Research Forests, Benton & Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1973. Monograph #14: Charles & Norman Hindes. Family History and Story of the Soap Creek Sawmilling and Logging Camp, Benton County, Oregon: 1928–1931. Monograph #15: Marvin Rowley. Family History and Management of Oregon State University Research Forests, Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1986. i ii MARVIN ROWLEY Family History and Management of the OSU Research Forests Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon: 1946–1995 Oral History Interviews by Royal G. Jackson, Jennifer Lee, and Bob Zybach Soap Creek Valley History Project OSU Research Forests Monograph #15 2009 iii iv AcKNOWLEDGMENTS The purpose of this project is to better understand the history of an area that has been managed by the College of Forestry since 1929 when Mary J. L. McDonald began making contributions to obtain land adjacent to the Arboretum for what would become McDonald-Dunn Forest. The Soap Creek Valley History Project is the outgrowth of an oral history project begun in the 1970s by Royal Jackson under the direction of John Beuter. Funding for the Soap Creek Valley History Project is provided by the Oregon State University (OSU) College of Forestry. The Soap Creek Valley History Project was authorized initially in 1989 by Dr. William Atkinson, former Director of the OSU Research Forests. The oral history portion of this project remained under Dr. Atkinson’s direction until January 1994, when it was assigned to Jeffrey Garver, Manager of the OSU Research Forests. In December of that year, responsibility for the oral histories was given to Ann Rogers, Cultural Resources Manager for the OSU Research Forests. The project has since been continued by Deborah Johnson and David Lysne. This publication was produced by the Forestry Communications Group of the College of Forestry. Special thanks go to Tim Hills, of McMenamins, for providing photos of the Multnomah Poor Farm (now McMenamins Edgefield), and to theT routdale Historical Society for allowing their use. Publication by the OSU College of Forestry does not necessarily imply the endorsement or support of views expressed herein. Cover photo: Marvin Rowley standing on McCulloch Peak in McDonald Forest. v vi Marv Rowley Oral History Areas of Interest McDonald-Dunn Forest vii viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Interviews Part I. January 25, 1979 .....................................................................1 Part II. January 31, 1979 ...................................................................16 Part III. February 6, 1979 ..................................................................38 Part IV. February 7, 1979 ..................................................................44 Part V. February 23, 1991 ................................................................57 Part VI. May 8, 1995 .........................................................................97 Appendices Appendix A. Marv’s Songs, by Marvin L. Rowley, Class of 1950 .....115 The Fernhopper Legend ...............................................................115 I Fell a Tree ...................................................................................116 The Song of theT rees ...................................................................117 The Saga of Mount Saint Helens, or What Really Happened May 18 ..................................................118 Appendix B. Seventy-fiveY ears with the Oregon State University School of Forestry’s Forestry Clubs ....................................................121 Index ..................................................................................................................127 ix x PART I - January 25, 1979 [Interview conducted by Royal Jackson and Jennifer Lee at Peavy Hall, Oregon State University.] What were the names of your grandparents? My grandmother and grandfather were Gangles. Gangles? Gangle. That’s an Austrian family. My grandfather came from Austria; my grandmother was born in Minnesota. Her mother had just arrived from Sweden. She was Swedish. Why did they come to this country? Well, I think my grandmother came here about the time there was a large migration from the Scandinavian countries, and basically they left the Scandinavian country because of over- population. In those countries the wars of the earlier times had ceased, and they had a fairly prosperous period. Large families had the tradition to divide the land among the sons. The farmlands were being divided into unproductive areas. As I understand from talking to some of these people, they actually raised funds to ship the sons off toA merica, or to help them get passage to America so they wouldn’t have to break the farm into smaller units. Do you remember your grandparents? Oh, yes, my grandmother. My grandmother and grandfather were divorced. I just saw my grandfather once. My grandmother had a real influence in my life. She was a real, oh, what we’d call a “character” in a way. Real self-sufficient. She’d been left with a large family to take care of herself. She washed clothes for people, did housework, picked fruit. This was in Minnesota? No, in Oregon. That’s after they’d come to Oregon that this happened. Why did they come to Oregon? Well, I think my great-grandmother and her husband had come to Woodland, Washington, some time earlier. About 1910, my grandmother, grandfather, and family came to Oregon. My grandfather had a variety of jobs. He worked in the woods as a busheler and a saw-filer back in those days. Are we talking about your [grand]parents on your mother’s side? Yes, on my mother’s side. Of course, my grandmother cooked, and cooked in logging camps a lot of times. On my father’s side—my father was born in Vancouver, and I was born in Port- land. Vancouver, Washington? Vancouver, Washington. His family background, the Rowleys, came from early pioneer stock. The earliest records inN ew England have Rowleys in them, and as far back as we know is Saratoga County, New York, about 1800. The family came toI llinois about 1850, and on west the next generations. 1 What ancestry is that? Oh, basically English. And my great-great-grandmother was French-Canadian. Her name was Nepiere [Mary E. Nepiere]. But my father was born in Vancouver. His mother was a Manny, and her family was a Scotch-Irish family. They were in the sawmill business in the Seattle area. In 1905, my father’s family moved to Seattle and my grandfather worked for his father-in-law in a sawmill where downtown Seattle is now. My dad and his uncle greased skids on a skid road. I think as near as I can gather, it was near Lake Washington, probably around where the University of Washington is. Do you remember that as a kid? No, no. That was a long time before I was born. I was born in Portland. They were only up there three or four years, and then came back to Portland. How did your father happen to come to Oregon? Well, he was born in Vancouver, Washington. His family moved to Seattle, and then to Port- land about 1906. How did he come to Washington? Where did he come from? Well, I don’t know. His parents were born in Illinois, and his grandparents were born in Il- linois, and I think they came, too. I’m not sure if it was just his dad who came west, or if he came with his parents. There were quite a few of the family in the Portland area, so I have an idea that they kind of came together. At the time of the Second World War, every Rowley in the Portland phone book was my relative—about a dozen of them. And now there are hun- dreds of them I guess. That was in Portland? Yes, in Portland. Everyone in Oregon was a relative I knew about, but there were a lot I didn’t know about. What year were you born? In 1924. In Portland out near the Lents District. Are you familiar with it? When I was four years old we moved to Tualatin, two miles southeast of Tualatin, to a place we nick-named “the sticks.” Why did you move there? Well, the folks had bought a five-acre tract, and the place was called the “Comte and Colman Tract.” All the logged-off areas had been subdivided into five-acre tracts. They wanted to get out of town. Was your dad a logger? No, he was a printer. Practically all his life he was a printer. Although he worked at different times, not in the woods, I wouldn’t say, but he worked around the woods people. Most of his family, you know, were in the woods. My uncles were woodworkers on both sides of my family.
Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Reciprocal Admissions Program
    AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 2021 RECIPROCAL ADMISSIONS PROGRAM Participating Gardens, Arboreta, and Conservatories For details on benefits and 90-mile radius enforcement, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Program Guidelines: A current membership card from the American Horticultural Society (AHS) or a participating RAP garden entitles the visitor to special admissions privileges and/or discounts at many different types of gardens. The AHS provides the following guidelines to its members and the members of participating gardens for enjoying their RAP benefits: This printable document is a listing of all sites that participate in the American Horticultural Society’s Reciprocal Admissions Program. This listing does not include information about the benefit(s) that each site offers. For details on benefits and enforcement of the 90- mile radius exclusion, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Call the garden you would like to visit ahead of time. Some gardens have exclusions for special events, for visitors who live within 90 miles of the garden, etc. Each garden has its own unique admissions policy, RAP benefits, and hours of operations. Calling ahead ensures that you get the most up to date information. Present your current membership card to receive the RAP benefit(s) for that garden. Each card will only admit the individual(s) whose name is listed on the card. In the case of a family, couple, or household membership card that does not list names, the garden must extend the benefit(s) to at least two of the members. Beyond this, gardens will refer to their own policies regarding household/family memberships.
    [Show full text]
  • Rushton F.Qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 289
    Rushton F.qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 289 INDEX 3rd Infantry Division, 228 98th General Hospital, 224 7th Army, 33, 41 101st Airborne Division, 42 7th Service Command, 97 109th General Hospital, 32 11th Field Hospital, 52 120th General Hospital, 94 20th Infantry Division, 269 125th Combat Support Hospital, 248 22nd General Hospital, 50 144th Evacuation Hospital, 200, 205, 235, 237, 241 27th Evacuation Hospital, 41 148th General Hospital, 100, 102 27th Field Hospital, 62, 67 181st General Hospital, 72 30th Medical Brigade, 229 220th General Hospital, 51 31st General Hospital, 17 227th General Hospital, 51 38th Infantry, 79 233rd General Hospital, 62 38th parallel, 155, 156, 158 235th General Hospital, 43 43rd General Hospital, 43 303rd General Hospital, 94, 95 50th General Hospital, 248 320th Expeditionary Medical Support Group, 281 54th Field Hospital, 35, 42 325th General Hospital Army Reserve Unit, 247 67th Combat Support Hospital, 248 328th General Hospital, 223, 225, 235 67th Evacuation Hospital, 164 376th Hospital Unit, 64 71st Evacuation Hospital, 164 376th Station Hospital, 60, 62 71st Station Hospital, 156 507th Main Force Company, 228 81st Field Hospital, 31, 35, 37, 39, 43, 44 566th Area Support Medical Company 83rd General Hospital, 112 (ASMC), 229 85th Station Hospital, 81 807th Medical Air Evacuation Squadron, 111 95th Army Hospital, 187 934th Forward Surgical Team, 225, 233 289 Rushton F.qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 290 Latter-day Saint Nurses at War Abegglen, JoAnn Coursey, 168–73 Bennett, Wallace F., 153 Ade, Wylma Jane Callahan,
    [Show full text]
  • Portland, Oregon, USA
    Portland, Oregon, USA Alison Blake + Vanessa Lee ‘The City that Works’ Left: Portland Skyline and Mount Hood Below: MAX, Portland’s Light-Rail Transit (credit: Portland Visitors Association) Portland, Oregon is an environmentally progressive Northwest city that has taken the concept of open space planning to heart. The development of a regional govern- Marginalia:phrase, quote, ment system (Metro) and the adoption of an urban growth boundary in 1979 have photo, drawing, diagram helped protect lands outside of the city while encouraging density and vibrancy (arial, 10pt, justify left) within the city limits. Portland is notable for having almost 6,000-acre Forest Park, the fi fth-largest municipal park in the country. At the same time, master planning efforts have given equal attention to livability and open space within the city, so that Portland today boasts a total of 247 parks and recreational sites including 196 neighborhood parks. Today, Portland is renowned for the efforts it has made to integrate public infrastruc- ture in the name of livability and planning for the future. Attention to the environment and specifi cally to open space are at the heart of these planning efforts, which in- clude the completion and expansion of Portland’s original park systems plan, known as the Forty-Mile Loop.Yet at the same time, Portlands facilities are aging and require attention if they are to meet the needs of an expanding population. Still think- ing ahead, Portland Parks adopted their plan for the future, the Parks 2020 Vision in the year 2000. (See page 5) 1 | PORTLAND, OR We need to blur the boundaries between Park and City.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement
    AALLBBAANNYY,, OORREEGGOONN 1845-1955 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT prepared for The City of Albany, Oregon by Liz Carter and Michelle Dennis Historic Preservation Consultants Eugene, Oregon 2004 The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, as provided through the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. Albany Historic Context Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………..…i INTRODUCTION ……………...………………………………………………………………...1 HISTORIC CONTEXT DEFINITION ………………………………………………..………….2 HISTORIC OVERVIEW OF THE CITY OF ALBANY …………………………………….…..4 Exploration and Fur Trade: 1811-1846 …………………………………………………. 4 Euro-American Settlement: 1830-1865 …………………………………………………. 4 Settlement, Statehood and Steam Power: 1845-1869 …………………………………….6 Railroads and Industrial Growth: 1870-1883…………………………………………….11 The Progression Era: 1884-1913…………………………………………………………16 Motor Age, The Great Depression, and WWII: 1914-1945………………………...……22 The Post-War Era: 1945-1955……………………………………………………………31 HISTORIC RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION ………………………………………………….34 Previous Surveys …………………………………………………………………….….34 Historic Resource Types: Descriptions and Distribution Patterns………………………34 Criteria for Evaluating
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Adair Areas of Potential Concern (AOPC) Status Update and Recommendations Report
    Technical Memorandum: Camp Adair Areas of Potential Concern (AOPC) Status Update and Recommendations Report Multiple Sites at the Former Camp Adair City of Adair Village, Oregon PREPARED BY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District April 2015 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 2. Site Activities and Investigations ................................................................................. 7 2.1. 1990 Boise-Cascade Preliminary Assessment III ........................................................ 7 2.2. 1995 UST Decommissioning Report ........................................................................... 7 2.3. 2003 USEPA Targeted Brownfield Assessment .......................................................... 8 2.4. 2007 Draft Preliminary Assessment Report ................................................................. 8 2.5. 2012 Site Investigation ................................................................................................ 9 2.6. 2014 Technical Memo: Background Desktop Exercise ................................................ 9 3. Evaluation of AOPCs .................................................................................................10 3.1. AOPC 1 – Bomarc Missile Site ...................................................................................10 3.2. AOPC 2 – Coal Storage Yard .....................................................................................10 3.3. AOPC 3 – Camp
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Park South Entry Vision
    WASHINGTON PARK SOUTH ENTRY VISION September 2012 V.V.O.M. WORLD FORESTRY CENTER PORTLAND CHILDREN’S MUSEUM TRI-MET OREGON ZOO Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE STORY 14 THE SOLUTION 27 PHASING AND COST 27 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDIX METRO / Portland Parks & Recreation / Washington Park Alliance i SEPTEMBER 2012 WASHINGTON PARK SOUTH ENTRY VISION INTRODUCTION This South Entry Vision report was commissioned by Metro and Portland » Creates a new entrance alignment and features, including stormwater, to Parks & Recreation (PP&R), on behalf of the Washington Park Alliance work with the proposed new drop-off and pick-up at the Oregon Zoo’s (WPA), to further develop the WPA’s Washington Park South Entry & proposed new Conservation Discovery Zone (CDZ). Parking Vision Study, dated April 20, 2011. » Consolidates most of the parking in a new structure built above grade, north of the TriMet station, to allow for more usable green, park space The scope of the original 2011 vision was to look at how to enhance the between the institutions; and character, clarify circulation, create a common green open space by replacing surface parking with a parking structure and improve pedestrian safety in » Provides a preliminary strategy for phasing and estimated project costs. the entire Washington Park south entry and parking area. A conceptual » PP&R intends to incorporate this report into a future update of the scheme was developed that met the WPA’s goals to create a common green Washington Park Master Plan. that enhanced the arrival experience into the park and met the collective needs of all the cultural institutions in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Reciprocal Admissions Program
    AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 2020 RECIPROCAL ADMISSIONS PROGRAM Participating Gardens, Arboreta, and Conservatories For details on benefits and 90-mile radius enforcement, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Program Guidelines: A current membership card from the American Horticultural Society (AHS) or a participating RAP garden entitles the visitor to special admissions privileges and/or discounts at many different types of gardens. The AHS provides the following guidelines to its members and the members of participating gardens for enjoying their RAP benefits: This printable document is a listing of all sites that participate in the American Horticultural Society’s Reciprocal Admissions Program. This listing does not include information about the benefit(s) that each site offers. For details on benefits and enforcement of the 90- mile radius exclusion, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Call the garden you would like to visit ahead of time. Some gardens have exclusions for special events, for visitors who live within 90 miles of the garden, etc. Each garden has its own unique admissions policy, RAP benefits, and hours of operations. Calling ahead ensures that you get the most up to date information. Present your current membership card to receive the RAP benefit(s) for that garden. Each card will only admit the individual(s) whose name is listed on the card. In the case of a family, couple, or household membership card that does not list names, the garden must extend the benefit(s) to at least two of the members. Beyond this, gardens will refer to their own policies regarding household/family memberships.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Park Celebrates 150 Years with Parkwide, Interactive Experience Discovery Points Connects Visitors to Park’S Many Destinations
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: LeiLani Barney | Marketing Manager [email protected] 509.954.3904 Washington Park Celebrates 150 Years with Parkwide, Interactive Experience Discovery Points Connects Visitors to Park’s Many Destinations PORTLAND, Ore. (June 15, 2021) — Washington Park, owned and managed by Portland Parks & Recreation, celebrates its 150th anniversary by inviting you to explore Portland’s destination park in an entirely new way this summer. Washington Park is marking its sesquicentennial with a parkwide, interactive experience called Discovery Points. It includes featured locations throughout the Park connecting visitors to stories and culture from the past 150 years. From the International Rose Test Garden’s first female curator in a century, and the influence of war in the creation of the Portland Japanese Garden, to how a 60-foot piece of art from Oregon Zoo’s past lives on, and a glimpse of Hoyt Arboretum through the decades – Discovery Points allows visitors to interact with unique stories behind some of the Park’s most well-known destinations. “Washington Park is a community of destinations that have all had a strong influence on the Park’s holistic story,” said Anna Goldrich, Chair of the Explore Washington Park Board of Directors and Executive Director of Hoyt Arboretum Friends, “150 years is an impressive milestone. It’s exciting to welcome visitors this summer to discover how the Park has been connecting people to nature through the years.” The entire experience is in free, public spaces – as well as fully virtual – and is available through fall. It’s also bilingual in English and Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenspaces Accomplishment Report
    metropolitan Greenspaces program Summary of Accomplishments 1991-2005 Metro U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Parks and Greenspaces Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 600 NE Grand Avenue 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97232 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 797-1850 (503) 231-6179 January 2005 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ...................................................................................................... 2 METROPOLITAN GREENSPACES PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 2 PUBLICATIONS, PRODUCTS and GREENSPACES PROJECTS ............................................ 4 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION GRANT PROJECTS ............................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANT PROJECTS ........................................................ 32 SALMONID EDUCATION AND ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROJECTS ............................ 57 GREEN CITY DATA PROJECT ................................................................................................ 64 Authors: This report was written by Ron Klein, Mel Huie, Lynn Wilson, Deb Scrivens and Ilene Moss of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces and Jennifer Thompson with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office. Contacts: Kemper McMaster, State Supervisor Jennifer Thompson, Greenspaces Program Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 231-6179 Jim Desmond, Director Metro Regional Parks & Greenspaces 600
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Management Practices for the Western Pond Turtle on Department of Defense Installations
    Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program Recommended Best Management Practices for the Western Pond Turtle on Department of Defense Installations Department of Defense Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation December 2020 Introduction The Northwestern Pond Turtle, Actinemys marmorata, and Southwestern Pond Turtle, Actinemys pallida (collectively referred to as “Western pond turtle” in this document) is a species for which the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has been petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Western pond turtles are also on the Department of Defense at- risk herpetofaunal species priority list. The Department of Defense (DoD), through its Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (PARC) network, and the USFWS have developed Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Western pond turtle. The management practices described in this document were developed specifically for DoD installations, but are also suitable for implementation off of DoD installations. The management practices described in this report are intended as guidelines that DoD natural resource managers can use to help plan, prioritize, and implement conservation and management actions that provide a conservation benefit to the Western pond turtle, while also providing information to comply with regulatory processes such as the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated components (i.e., Categorical Exclusions, Environmental Assessments, and Environmental Impact Statements). Implementation of these BMPs should not impede military readiness activities, should be documented in installation Integrated Natural Resource Management Plans (INRMPs), and should align with existing efforts among the DoD, federal/state governmental agencies, and non- governmental organizations (NGOs) to prevent this species’ continued decline and preclude its listing under the ESA.
    [Show full text]