DOCSLIB.ORG

Worthing in the County of West Sussex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worthing in the County of West Sussex Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 30 4 LOCAL GOVERNi-MT BOUNDARY COAIT.1I SSI OK FOR ENGLAND REPORT LOCAL UOV^'UlJ.L^'i.1 liO'JilLA^vY CUi.ii/iISSIGM FOii ISKGLAHD CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Co rapt on GCB. KBJi DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEIvIBKRS Lady Bowden MrJ T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm li'ir R R Thornton C3 L Mr D P Harrison To the Rt Hon Jferlyn Bees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS TOR FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS TOR THE BOROUGH OF WORTHING IN THE COUNTY OF WEST SUSSEX 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our Initial review of the electoral arrangements for the Borough of Worthing, in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 31 December 1974 that we were to undertake this review* This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Worthing Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to West Sussex County Council, the Member of Parliament for the oonsitituenoy concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties* Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited consents from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* The Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration* When doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972, and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of the council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. They were also asked to take into account any views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests. We therefore asked that they should publish details of their provisional proposals about a month before they submitted their draft scheme to us, thus allowing an opportunity for local comment* 4. The Borough Counoil have passed a resolution under section ?U)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972 requesting the Secretary of State to provide for a system of elections by thirds* 5. On 28 May 1975, Worthing Borough Council presented their draft scheme of representation. They proposed to divide the area of the borough into 13 wards, each returning 3 members to form a council of 39* At that time they were under the impression that this would also provide 13 county electoral divisions, but when it became apparent that no agreement could be reached about the future size of the county council, Worthing Borough Council were given the opportunity to revise their scheme. 6* On 13 January 1977, the Worthing Borough Council presented a revised draft scheme. They proposed 12 wards eaoh returning 3 members to form a council of 36. 7. We considered the revised draft scheme, the comments which had been made on it, and an alternative scheme from a local political association. We decided to adopt the revised draft scheme as our draft proposals, subject to one minor realignment suggested to us by Ordnance Survey. 8. On 10 June 1977 we issued our draft proposals and these were sent to all who had received our consultation letter or had commented on the Council's draft scheme. The Council were asked to make the draft proposals, and the accompanying map which defined the proposed ward boundaries, available for inspection at their main offices. Representations on our draft proposals were invited from those to whom they were circulated and, by public notices, from members of the public and interested bodies. We asked that comments should reach us by 5 August 1977. 9« The Borough Council supported the draft proposals* 10. A local political association accepted the draft proposals In general bat asked for the realignment of the boundary between the proposed Byoadwater and Offlngton wards* A local political party asked for the reconsideration of their alternative scheme for the wards north of the railway* 11* In view of these comments, we felt we needed more information to enable us to reach a conclusion* Therefore, in accordance with Section 65(2) of the Local Government Act 1972, and at our request, Mr J Whatley was appointed an Assistant Commissioner to hold a local meeting and report to us* Notice of the meeting was sent to all who had received our draft proposals, or had commented on them, and was published locally. 12* The Assistant Commissioner held the meeting in the Town Hall, Worthing on 2 November 1977 and visited the areas which were the subject of comment. A copy of his report to us is at Schedule 1 to this-report. 13* In the light of the discussion at the meeting and his inspection of the area the Assistant Commissioner recommended that our draft proposals should be confirmed subject to the realignment of the boundary between the Broadwater and Offlngton wards. 14. We reviewed our draft proposals in the light of the comments which we had received and of the Assistant Commissioner's report. We concluded that the recommendation made by the Assistant Commissioner should be accepted and, subject to the modification he had suggested, we decided to confirm our draft proposals as our final proposals. 15. Details of these proposals are set out in Schedule 2 to this report and on the attached map. Schedule 2 gives the names of the wards and the number of councillors to be returned by each* The boundaries of the new wards are defined on the map. A detailed description of the proposed ward boundaries is set out in Schedule 3. to this report. PUBLICATION . 16. In accordance uith section 60(5)(b} of the Local Government Act 1972, a copy of this report and a copy of the map are being sent to Worthing Borough Council and will be available for public inspection at the Council's mn-)n offices. Copies of this report (without map) are being sent to those who received the consultation letter and those who made comments. L.S. SIGNEDi EDMUND COMPTON (CHAIRMAN) JOHN M RANKIN (DEPUTY. CHAIRMAN) PHYLLIS BOWDEN T BROCKBAKK MICHAEL CHISHOLM D P HARRISON R R THORNTON N DIGNEI (Secretary) 21 September 1978 CHEDULE 1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT ON ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS BOROUGH OF WORTHING J. Whatley, December 1977 TO: THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT of a local meeting held at the Town Hall, Worthing at 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 2nd November, 1977 to consider the Commission's draft proposals concerning the electoral arrangements for the Borough of Worthing PRESENT: Name Organisation Represented Lewis Elliott Borough Secretary, Wo.rthing Borough Counci Harold E. Herrtage Secretary, Worthing Conservative Assn. Catherine M. Morey Chairman -do- G. E, Freelove Deputy Chairman .-do- H. W. Yates Borough Councillor, representing West Tarring Branch, Worthing Conservative Associ ation D. 0, Terrett Worthing Conservative Association R. J, Stanford Arun District Council, Littlehampton A. M, Thomas West Sussex County Council (Secretariat) I. J, Hudson Offington Branch Conservatives ; A. H, Hudson Hon. Secretary, Offington Branch Conservative Associat ion L. Ingram. Liberal Association Mr. A, Pescott 46 Ruskin Road, Worthing Mr. c'. Pescott 46 Ruskin Road, Worthing Stella M. Yates 14 St. Lawrence Avenue, Worthing S. M. Searle 37 Nutbourne Road, Worthing P. J, Perry Castle Goring Branch Labour Party P. V, 0. Drummond 7 Coniston Road - Worthing Constituency Labour Party H. 'C. Ash 49Coniston Road, Worthing N. W. Batty Principal Administrative Officer, Worthing Borough Council Hilda Griffin 29 Meredith Road R. D. Clamp Worthing Borough Council R. Mills Worthing Gazette B. C. Bettelley Worthing Borough Council - 2 - COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS The Commission's draft propo'sals were issued on 10th June 1977 and are as follows :- NAME OF WARD NUMBER OF COUNCILLORS BROADWATER 3 CASTLE 3 CENTRAL . 3 DURRINGTON 3 GAISFORD - 3 GORING 3 HEENE . 3 . MARINE 3 OFFINGTON 3 SALVINGTON 3 SELDEN ... 3 TARRING ,3 A description of the boundaries of the wards proposed by the Commission is attached as Annex A OBJECTIONS TO THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS Worthing Conservative Association The Association accepted the draft proposals subject to a modification to the boundary between the proposed Offington and Broadwater wards. The Association suggested that this boundary should follow the line of the western portions of Broadwater Street West and Upper Brighton Road to the point where the two roads meet instead of going down Cissbury Road. Worthing Constituency Labour Party The Labour Party accepted the draft proposals except for three wards -Salvington, Durrington and Castle. They suggested modifications to these three wards which would' affect the boundaries of all the seven wards north of the main railway line which runs east to west through the Borough. Generally, the Labour Party suggested that the ward boundaries should run along main roads such as the Boulevard, Durrington Lane, Tarring Road, Findon Road and St. Laurence Avenue. Their reasons for these suggestions were that the Commission1s proposals tended to divide compact communities and that voters would be compelled to cross busy main roads in order to record their votes. In their written submission the Labour Party-also suggested .that part of the proposed Durringtori ward should be called "Northbrook" and that the proposed Castle Ward should be called "Maybridge" but these matters were not mentioned at the hearing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rustington Retail Park
    Free bus service Rustington Retail Park Sainsbury’s Rustington Superstore Unit C, Rustington Retail Park New Road, Rustington Littlehampton BN16 3RT Telephone: 01903 641 820 Store opening hours Monday 07:00 - 22:00 Tuesday 07:00 - 22:00 Wednesday 07:00 - 22:00 Thursday 07:00 - 22:00 September 2020 Friday 07:00 - 22:00 Saturday 07:00 - 22:00 Sunday 10:00 - 16:00 Durrington - Angmering Westergate - Arundel - Angmering Bognor Regis - Elmer - Wick R1 R3 R5 Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays Tuesdays & Thursdays Friday only Durrington, Centenary House 0930 Westergate, Barnett Close 0947 Bognor Regis, High Street 1050 Salvington, Cheviot Road 0939 Barnham, Railway Station 0951 Felpham, The Southdowns 1057 Durrington, Lamb Inn 0942 Walberton, Post Office 0956 Middleton, Sea Lane 1100 Maybridge, The Avenue 0946 Arundel, Jarvis Road 1007 Elmer, Templesheen Road 1103 Goring Green, Boxgrove 0949 Arundel, High Street 1013 Sainsbury’s Rustington arr 1120 Ferring, War Memorial 0956 Poling Corner 1018 Sainsbury’s Rustington dep 1310 Angmering, Bramley Green Est.. 1006 Angmering, Chantryfield Road 1024 Angmering, The Green 1009 Angmering Green 1026 Sorry, no service on public holidays Sainsbury’s Rustington arr 1013 Sainsbury’s Rustington arr 1031 Sainsbury’s Rustington dep 1135 Sainsbury’s Rustington dep 1200 Mondays to Fridays 12 Serves Sainsburys Rustington Goring - South Ferring Storrington - Washington - Findon every hour between 1000 & 1400 From: R2 R4 Littlehampton Station Tuesdays & Thursdays Mondays & Wednesdays Littlehampton, Anchor Springs Goring,
    [Show full text]
  • Adur & Worthing Councils Worthing Town Hall Chapel Road Worthing West Sussex, BN11 1HA
    Adur & Worthing Councils Worthing Town Hall Chapel Road Worthing West Sussex, BN11 1HA www.adur-worthing.gov.uk Jon Heuch Date: 4th January 2019 Sent via: Service: Information Governance [email protected] Our Reference: EIR/927453/2018 Dear Jon Heuch Thank you for contacting us requesting a review of our decision relating to your recent Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (‘EIR’) request. Your request has been passed to me to consider. Chronology 5th December 2018 You submitted a request for information to Adur & Worthing Council (‘AWC’), asking for the following information: “Could you tell me how many Tree Preservation Orders are currently administered by the Council? Could you tell me the date when the oldest TPO currently still valid was served?” 6th December 2018 AWC acknowledged your request. 6th December 2018 AWC provided you with a response to your request which I have attached for your ease of reference. 7th December 2018 You emailed AWC requesting a review of our response as follows: Adur & Worthing Councils, Worthing Town Hall, Chapel Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1HA www.adur-worthing.gov.uk - facebook.com/AdurWorthingCouncils - twitter.com/adurandworthing “Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews. I am writing to request an internal review of Worthing Borough Council's handling of my FOI request 'Number of Tree Preservation Orders administered by the council'. The Council has answered my second question so only the first question remains: How many Tree
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change. Deeper Participation and Increase Equity of Access
    ADUR & WORTHING CLIMATE ASSEMBLY Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly Recommendations Report: How can we in Adur and Worthing collectively tackle climate change and support our places to thrive? What does this mean for the way we live and our local environment? Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly | Recommendations Report Introduction In July 2019, Adur & Worthing Councils1 declared a climate emergency. Since then, the Councils have been working hard to address some of the most pressing environmental challenges facing all of us, including climate change, the loss of natural habitats, unnecessary waste and poor air quality.Their aim is to ensure everyone in the community is able to enjoy green spaces and access affordable clean energy and transport. In 2020, the Councils held a Climate Assembly, and invited local residents to have their say on this important issue.The Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly was the first Citizens Assembly held by the Councils.This report highlights the process and the recommendations that came from it. 1www.adur-worthing.gov.uk 2 Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly | Recommendations Report Who are the Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly? The Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly are a group of 43 randomly selected people from the Adur District and Worthing Borough areas.They came together virtually over five weekends between Sep- tember and December 2020 to discuss how to tackle climate change whilst helping the area to thrive. The Climate Assembly members are: The Climate Assembly members are: Amanda Geoffrey Jill Pamela Andy
    [Show full text]
  • Adur & Worthing Local Walking & Cycling Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP)
    Adur & Worthing Councils Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan We received an overwhelming positive response at the consultation. I’m delighted to support this plan to improve our cycling and walking infrastructure across the Borough Dan Humphreys Leader (Worthing Borough Council) 2 Contents It’s clear that our residents Our vision 4 What is the LCWIP 10 and visitors to the District Adur and Worthing 18 would cycle and walk more Worthing Borough 22 Adur District 28 with improved routes. This plan Case studies 34 provides us with a fantastic Liveable cities & towns 36 Low traffic neighbourhood 38 foundation to create the Worthing walking & cycling network map 40 Adur walking & cycling network map 42 network of the future PCT commute data 46 Neil Parkin PCT school data 47 Worthing PCT commute data 48 Leader (Adur District Council) Adur PCT commute data 49 Worthing PCT school data 50 Adur PCT school data 51 Adur & Worthing census commuters by car 52 Glossary of terms 54 All maps © Crown Copyright and database right (2020). Ordnance Survey 100024321 & 100018824 Our Vision We share the ambition to achieve this through: To create a place where walking and Better Safety Better Mobility cycling becomes The Councils share A safe and reliable way to travel for More people cycling and walking - easy, the preferred way of the government’s short journeys normal and enjoyable ambition: Streets where people cycling and More high quality cycling facilities To make cycling and • • moving around Adur walking feel they belong, and are walking the natural More urban areas that are considered safe • and Worthing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Town W E W Ant Community Strategy
    The Town We Want Community Strategy Worthing Together is made up of the following organisations and partnerships: PUBLIC SECTOR Sussex Police Authority Sussex Police Worthing Borough Council West Sussex County Council Government Offi ce for the South East Adur Arun and Worthing Teaching Primary Care Trust Environment Agency West Sussex Youth Service BUSINESS SECTOR Federation of Small Businesses (Worthing) Stagecoach VOLUNTARY AND COMMUNITY SECTOR Churches Together in Worthing Worthing Council for Voluntary Service Worthing Citizens Advice Bureau Worthing Society Worthing Council of Community Associations Worthing CVS (Voluntary & Community Sector) Forum Worthing Community Arts Council EDUCATION SECTOR Worthing College Northbrook College Worthing Learning Network West Sussex Learning Partnership HOUSING SECTOR Worthing Homes Ltd Worthing Churches Homeless Project Worthing Registered Social Landlords Forum PARTNERSHIPS Worthing Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership Worthing Local Planning Group for Community Health and Social Care Worthing Community Partnership The Town We Want Worthing’s Community Strategy, 2004-2014 CONTENTS Page 2 Foreword 3 A seaside town or a town by the sea? 4 The Borough of Worthing 5 Wish You Were Here? – Worthing’s Interim Community Strategy, 2003-2004 6 The Town We Want – Worthing’s Community Strategy, 2004-2014 8 • A town with an active involved community 10 • A safe town 12 • A prosperous town 14 • A town with fewer inequalities 16 • A town with something for everyone 18 • A learning town 20 • A town you can get around 22 Background information 23 Glossary of terms Foreword By Cllr Mrs Geraldine Lissenburg and John Robinson Another key aspect of Co-Chairs of Worthing Together The Town We Want is the extent to which it has been Worthing has much to offer its residents, working people and informed by the views of the visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoy Farm W/WO/1
    Agenda item 5 Appendix A Decoy Farm W/WO/1 Site description Borough Worthing Parish Worthing Town Council Area (ha) Approximately 9 Potential waste Potential for a built waste facility, this could include, waste types transfer, recycling (eg. MRF) or treatment (eg. energy from waste, anaerobic digestion). Potential waste Approximately 50,000 tpa capacity Current use The site is a former landfill site and is adjacent to an existing industrial estate to the west and south with strategic gap to the north and east. There is an existing HWRS on the site. Owner Worthing Borough Council Potential Not known Operator Planning history and current permissions Planning policy Site was a provisional allocation in the Strategic Waste Sites Allocation DPD Preferred Options, 2007. Site has been identified in Worthing Borough Council’s Core Strategy (2011) as an ‘area of change’. The policy identifies opportunities for a range of B1, B2 and B8 industrial uses or open storage, which would compliment the existing HWRS. Planning history Former landfill site, HWRS on the site. Agenda item 5 Appendix A Fit with the spatial strategy Proximity to Proximity to waste arisings from the main urban areas waste arisings along the coast, in particular Worthing and Lancing/Sompting. Proximity to C&D waste transfer site and energy recovery at Sussex existing waste Waste Recycling, Chartwell Road Industrial Estate; open sites windrow composting sites at Noth Barn Farm and Hangleton Nursery, West Worthing. Inert recycling at New Monks Farm, Shoreham. Proximity to Approx. 2km from the ALR advisory lorry route (ALR) Can it be delivered? Availability The owner considers that the site is suitable for waste uses, however has concerns over the access.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough
    Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough November 2015 Rev B hankinson duckett associates telephone: 01491 838175 email: [email protected] website: www.hda-enviro.co.uk post: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing was prepared by Hankinson Duckett Associates (HDA). The study was commissioned and funded by the joint authority of Adur and Worthing Councils. The work has been guided by Ian Moody, Principal Planning Officer of Adur and Worthing Councils. Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing 2015 CONTENTS Fgures 1 Introduction page 1 Fig 1 Greenfield Site Locations page 5 2 Method Statement page 1 Fig 2 Solid and Drift Geology page 6 3 Policy Context page 3 Fig 3 Topography page 7 4 Landscape and Ecology Context page 3 Fig 4 Agricultural Land Classification page 8 5 Site 1: Land North of Beeches Avenue (WB08176) page 20 Fig 5 National Character Areas and Landscape Typologies page 9 Site 2: Worthing United Football Club (WB0162) page 26 Fig 6 West Sussex Landscape Character Areas page 10 Site 3: Upper Brighton Road (WB08063) page 30 Fig 7 Local Landscape Character Areas page 11 Site 4: Goring-Ferring Gap (WB088182)
    [Show full text]
  • Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly Recommendations Report
    ADUR & WORTHING CLIMATE ASSEMBLY Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly Recommendations Report: How can we in Adur and Worthing collectively tackle climate change and support our places to thrive? What does this mean for the way we live and our local environment? Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly | Recommendations Report Introduction In July 2019, Adur & Worthing Councils1 declared a climate emergency. Since then, the Councils have been working hard to address some of the most pressing environmental challenges facing all of us, including climate change, the loss of natural habitats, unnecessary waste and poor air quality. Their aim is to ensure everyone in the community is able to enjoy green spaces and access affordable clean energy and transport. In 2020, the Councils held a Climate Assembly, and invited local residents to have their say on this important issue. The Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly was the first Citizens Assembly held by the Councils. This report highlights the process and the recommendations that came from it. 1www.adur-worthing.gov.uk 2 Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly | Recommendations Report Who are the Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly? The Adur & Worthing Climate Assembly are a group of 43 randomly selected people from the Adur District and Worthing Borough areas. They came together virtually over five weekends between Sep- tember and December 2020 to discuss how to tackle climate change whilst helping the area to thrive. The Climate Assembly members are: The Climate Assembly members are: Amanda Geoffrey Jill Pamela Andy
    [Show full text]
  • Worthing Borough Council / Horsham District Council Statement of Common Ground
    Worthing Borough Council / Horsham District Council Statement of Common Ground Signatories: Lynn Lambert Kevin Jenkins Cabinet Member for Planning and Executive Member for Regeneration Development Dated: 2nd June 2021 1. Introduction and Scope 1.1 Local Planning Authorities are required by the Localism Act 2011 to meet the 'Duty to Cooperate', that is to engage constructively and actively on an on-going basis on planning matters that impact on more than one local planning area. 1.2 The National Planning Policy Framework and National Planning Policy Guidance sets out the strategic issues where co-operation might be appropriate. In this regard, local planning authorities are expected to demonstrate evidence of having effectively cooperated to plan for issues with cross-boundary impacts when their Local Plans are submitted for examination. 1.3 The overall aim is to ensure appropriate co-ordination and planning for the cross-boundary strategic planning issues that exist and/or are likely to arise in the foreseeable future between the Councils. This Statement of Common Ground (SoCG) helps to meet this requirement and it should be considered alongside the respective parties’ Duty to Co-operate Statements which have been prepared to support the Worthing Local Plan (WLP) and Horsham District Local Plan (HDLP) respectively. 2 Worthing Context 2.1 Worthing is located within West Sussex on the coastal plain, with the only breaks in an almost continuous band of urban development along the coast being at the far eastern and western ends of the borough. Whilst being principally a compact urban area, there are a number of highly valued greenspaces, parks and gardens within and around the town.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Detached Sea-Facing Villa Along the South Coast C.1740– 1800’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
    Sue Berry, ‘The Development of the Detached Sea-facing Villa along the South Coast c.1740– 1800’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XVI, 2008, pp. 31–42 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2008 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DETACHED SEA-FACING VILLA ALONG THE SOUTH COAST C. – SUE BERRY INTRODUCTION THE SEASIDE VILLA COMES INTO FASHION From the s, wealthy people built detached, sea- facing houses to appreciate the sea view and to enjoy Seaside villas had Roman antecedents. In , seaside activities. By the s, the label ‘marine Robert Castell published Villas of the Ancients , in villa’ commonly described these substantial houses. which he attempted to reconstruct Pliny the When seeking to sell these houses, agents sometimes Younger’s large Laurentian seaside villa near Ostia called them both marine villas and cottages ornées in from Pliny’s descriptions. Pliny wrote enthusiastically newspaper advertisements. Most of these villas were about the combination of seaside views and sounds large, stood in their own grounds and had stabling and the villa’s rural setting. The reconstruction can and gardens. Those outside towns normally had be assumed to have influenced the design and layout bigger gardens and land which was used for pasture of English seaside villas of the eighteenth century. or for further landscaping. Spectacular villas along the banks of the Thames By , sea-facing villas were scattered along were encouraged by ease of water travel and by the the south coast of England. The purpose of this opportunity they offered to show off wealth by facing article is to draw attention to their large number (the the Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Priority Sites
    Heritage at Risk Priority Sites Contents Page Introduction 2 East Midlands 3 East of England 16 London 27 North East 41 North West 53 South East 64 South West 76 West Midlands 87 Yorkshire and the Humber 99 1 Introduction What are priority Heritage at Risk Sites? Priority Heritage at Risk sites are those sites that English Heritage has identified for additional support to save them for the future. We will be working with owners, developers, trusts and local authorities to find the right solution for these sites with the aim of getting them repaired and back into sustainable use where possible, so they can be removed from the Heritage at Risk Register. Solutions will vary from site to site, possibly with more than one option and so the support that English Heritage will provide is site and option dependent. The different kinds of support could include one or more activities such as expert local advice, partnership working with local authorities, updated information on the significance of the site to aid understanding, and grant aid. For further information or to discuss a site on the priority list contact the relevant English Heritage office. East Midlands Tel: 01604 735400 Email: [email protected] East of England Tel: 01223 582700 Email: [email protected] London Tel: 020 7973 3000 Email: [email protected] North East Tel: 0191 269 1200 Email: [email protected] North West Tel: 0161 242 1400 Email: [email protected] South East Tel: 01483 252000 Email:
    [Show full text]
  • INFRASTRUCTURE BUSINESS PLAN - Appendices SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY
    Agenda Item 10 Report PC20/21-18 Appendix 3 INFRASTRUCTURE BUSINESS PLAN - Appendices SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY October 2020 123 Agenda Item 10 Report PC20/21-18 Appendix 3 APPENDIX A: TOTAL CIL RECEIPTS PASSED ONTO PARISH / TOWN COUNCILS (REGULATION 121B) Total paid to Parish / Town Total spent by Parish / Town Council from April 2017 to Parish / Town (where CIL liable development has 31st March 2020 Council up until Notes commenced) end of 2019 / 20 Currently unspent financial year Aldingbourne Parish Council £532.50 Alfriston Parish Council £188.34 Bepton Parish Council £396.00 £1,125.00 Works to War Memorial and Village Gate Bramdean and Hinton Ampner Parish Council £21,572.15 Buriton Parish Council £20,094.16 Clapham Parish Council £24,679.26 £600.00 Purchased a defibrillator Coldwaltham Parish Council £300.60 Compton Parish Council £1,089.09 Corhampton and Meonstoke Parish Council £1,332.80 Ditchling Parish Council £17,904.00 Droxford Parish Council £4,798.24 £4,055.00 A new timber play fort has been provided. Easebourne Parish Council £2,450.85 East Chiltington Parish Council £771.90 East Dean and Friston Parish Council £3,125.23 East Meon Parish Council £1,683.12 £1,433.88 Playground equipment improvements. Falmer Parish Council £157.84 Fernhurst Parish Council £2,096.34 Froxfield & Privett Parish Council £3,631.20 Fulking Parish Council £1,690.00 Funtington Parish Council £30,831.32 Greatham Parish Council £8,229.00 INFRASTRUCTURE BUSINESS PLAN - APPENDICES PAGE 2 124 Agenda Item 10 Report PC20/21-18 Appendix 3 Total paid to Parish / Town Total spent by Parish / Town Council from April 2017 to Parish / Town (where CIL liable development has 31st March 2020 Council up until Notes commenced) end of 2019 / 20 Currently unspent financial year Hambledon Parish Council £304.00 Hassocks Parish Council £2,954.33 Hawkley Parish Council £0.00 £958.09 Play equipment and re-surfacing works.
    [Show full text]