Degradation in Macrophages Effect Through Accelerated IRAK1 Exerts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nonredundant Roles of TIRAP and Myd88 in Airway Response to Endotoxin, Independent of TRIF, IL-1 and IL-18 Pathways
Laboratory Investigation (2006) 86, 1126–1135 & 2006 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0023-6837/06 $30.00 www.laboratoryinvestigation.org Nonredundant roles of TIRAP and MyD88 in airway response to endotoxin, independent of TRIF, IL-1 and IL-18 pathways Dieudonne´e Togbe1, Gorse Aurore1, Nicolas Noulin1,2, Vale´rie FJ Quesniaux1, Silvia Schnyder-Candrian1, Bruno Schnyder1, Virginie Vasseur1, Shizuo Akira3, Kasper Hoebe4, Bruce Beutler4, Bernhard Ryffel1,* and Isabelle Couillin1,* 1Molecular Immunology and Embryology, CNRS UMR6218, Transgenose Institute, Orleans, France; 2R&D Department, Key-Obs, Orleans, France; 3Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan and 4Department of Immunology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA Inhaled endotoxins induce an acute inflammatory response in the airways mediated through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88). However, the relative roles of the TLR4 adaptor proteins TIRAP and TRIF and of the MyD88-dependent IL-1 and IL-18 receptor pathways in this response are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that endotoxin-induced acute bronchoconstriction, vascular damage resulting in protein leak, Th1 cytokine and chemokine secretion and neutrophil recruitment in the airways are abrogated in mice deficient for either TIRAP or MyD88, but not in TRIF deficient mice. The contribution of other TLR-independent, MyD88-dependent signaling pathways was investigated in IL-1R1, IL-18R and caspase-1 (ICE)-deficient mice, which displayed normal airway responses to endotoxin. In conclusion, the TLR4-mediated, bronchoconstric- tion and acute inflammatory lung pathology to inhaled endotoxin critically depend on the expression of both adaptor proteins, TIRAP and MyD88, suggesting cooperative roles, while TRIF, IL-1R1, IL-18R signaling pathways are dispensable. -
Signaling Molecules§ Erin E
Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 112 (2006) 302–308 www.elsevier.com/locate/vetimm Short communication Cloning and radiation hybrid mapping of bovine toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) signaling molecules§ Erin E. Connor a, Elizabeth A. Cates a,b, John L. Williams c, Douglas D. Bannerman a,* a Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA b University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA c Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland, UK Received 17 January 2006; accepted 7 March 2006 Abstract Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 is a transmembrane receptor for lipopolysaccharide, a highly pro-inflammatory component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. To date, molecules of the TLR-4 signaling pathway have not been well characterized in cattle. The goal of this study was to clone and sequence the full-length coding regions of bovine genes involved in TLR-4 signaling including CASP8, IRAK1, LY96 (MD-2), TICAM2, TIRAP, TOLLIP and TRAF 6 and to position these genes, as well as MyD88 and TICAM1, on the bovine genome using radiation hybrid mapping. Results of this work indicate differences with a previously published bovine sequence for LY96 and a predicted sequence in the GenBank database for TIRAP based on the most recent assembly of the bovine genome. In addition, discrepancies between actual and predicted chromosomal map positions based on the Btau_2.0 genome assembly release were identified, although map positions were consistent with predicted locations based on the current bovine-human comparative map. Alignment of the bovine amino acid sequences with human and murine sequences showed a broad range in conservation, from 52 to 93%. -
Dissecting Negative Regulation of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling
Review Dissecting negative regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling 1,2 1,2 1,2 Takeshi Kondo , Taro Kawai and Shizuo Akira 1 Laboratory of Host Defense, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 2 Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense invading microbial pathogens. MyD88 is recruited to all TLRs except for pathogens and play crucial roles in the activation of TLR3 and associates with IL-1R-associated kinases (IRAKs) innate and adaptive immunity. However, excessive and TNFR-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), resulting in activa- TLR activation can disrupt immune homeostasis, and tion of canonical inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene may be responsible for the development of autoimmune enhancer in B-cells, kinases (IKKs) (IKKa and IKKb) and and inflammatory diseases. As such, the molecules and nuclear factor (NF)-kBs (Figure 1). In contrast, TRIF is pathways that negatively control TLR signaling have recruited to TLR3 and TLR4, leading to activation of been intensively investigated. Here, we discuss recent NF-kB as well as noncanonical IKKs (TRAF-family- insights into the negative regulation of TLR signaling, member-associated NF-kB activator (TANK) binding kinase with focus on three major mechanisms: (i) dissociation 1 (TBK1) and IKKi) and interferon (IFN) regulatory factor of adaptor complexes; (ii) degradation of signal proteins; (IRF)3 via TRAF proteins (Figure 2). TIRAP functions as a and (iii) transcriptional regulation. We also highlight sorting adapter that recruits MyD88 to TLR2 and TLR4, how pathogens negatively target TLR signaling as a whereas TRAM functions as a bridge adapter between TLR4 strategy to evade the host immune response. -
Profiling Data
Compound Name DiscoveRx Gene Symbol Entrez Gene Percent Compound Symbol Control Concentration (nM) JNK-IN-8 AAK1 AAK1 69 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(E255K)-phosphorylated ABL1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(F317I)-nonphosphorylated ABL1 87 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(F317I)-phosphorylated ABL1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(F317L)-nonphosphorylated ABL1 65 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(F317L)-phosphorylated ABL1 61 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(H396P)-nonphosphorylated ABL1 42 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(H396P)-phosphorylated ABL1 60 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(M351T)-phosphorylated ABL1 81 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(Q252H)-nonphosphorylated ABL1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(Q252H)-phosphorylated ABL1 56 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(T315I)-nonphosphorylated ABL1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(T315I)-phosphorylated ABL1 92 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1(Y253F)-phosphorylated ABL1 71 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1-nonphosphorylated ABL1 97 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL1-phosphorylated ABL1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ABL2 ABL2 97 1000 JNK-IN-8 ACVR1 ACVR1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ACVR1B ACVR1B 88 1000 JNK-IN-8 ACVR2A ACVR2A 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ACVR2B ACVR2B 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ACVRL1 ACVRL1 96 1000 JNK-IN-8 ADCK3 CABC1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ADCK4 ADCK4 93 1000 JNK-IN-8 AKT1 AKT1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 AKT2 AKT2 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 AKT3 AKT3 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ALK ALK 85 1000 JNK-IN-8 AMPK-alpha1 PRKAA1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 AMPK-alpha2 PRKAA2 84 1000 JNK-IN-8 ANKK1 ANKK1 75 1000 JNK-IN-8 ARK5 NUAK1 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ASK1 MAP3K5 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 ASK2 MAP3K6 93 1000 JNK-IN-8 AURKA AURKA 100 1000 JNK-IN-8 AURKA AURKA 84 1000 JNK-IN-8 AURKB AURKB 83 1000 JNK-IN-8 AURKB AURKB 96 1000 JNK-IN-8 AURKC AURKC 95 1000 JNK-IN-8 -
Targeting Myddosome Signaling in Waldenström’S
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 20, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3265 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. IRAK 1/4 Inhibition in Waldenström’s Ni, H. et al. Targeting Myddosome Signaling in Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia with the Interleukin-1 Receptor- associated Kinase 1/4 Inhibitor R191 Haiwen Ni1,2,#, Fazal Shirazi2,#, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani3, Heather Lin3, Isere Kuiatse2, Hua Wang2, Richard J. Jones2, Zuzana Berkova2, Yasumichi Hitoshi4, Stephen M. Ansell5, Steven P. Treon6, Sheeba K. Thomas2, Hans C. Lee2, Zhiqiang Wang2, R. Eric Davis2, and Robert Z. Orlowski2,7,* 1Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, JangSu, China; 2Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 4Rigel, South San Francisco, CA; The 5Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The 6Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 7Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX #Indicates that these authors contributed equally. Address correspondence to: Dr. Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 429, Houston, TX 77030-4009, E-mail: [email protected], Telephone 713-794-3234, Fax 713- 563-5067 Page 1 Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 20, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3265 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. -
RT² Profiler PCR Array (96-Well Format and 384-Well [4 X 96] Format)
RT² Profiler PCR Array (96-Well Format and 384-Well [4 x 96] Format) Human Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Pathway Cat. no. 330231 PAHS-018ZA For pathway expression analysis Format For use with the following real-time cyclers RT² Profiler PCR Array, Applied Biosystems® models 5700, 7000, 7300, 7500, Format A 7700, 7900HT, ViiA™ 7 (96-well block); Bio-Rad® models iCycler®, iQ™5, MyiQ™, MyiQ2; Bio-Rad/MJ Research Chromo4™; Eppendorf® Mastercycler® ep realplex models 2, 2s, 4, 4s; Stratagene® models Mx3005P®, Mx3000P®; Takara TP-800 RT² Profiler PCR Array, Applied Biosystems models 7500 (Fast block), 7900HT (Fast Format C block), StepOnePlus™, ViiA 7 (Fast block) RT² Profiler PCR Array, Bio-Rad CFX96™; Bio-Rad/MJ Research models DNA Format D Engine Opticon®, DNA Engine Opticon 2; Stratagene Mx4000® RT² Profiler PCR Array, Applied Biosystems models 7900HT (384-well block), ViiA 7 Format E (384-well block); Bio-Rad CFX384™ RT² Profiler PCR Array, Roche® LightCycler® 480 (96-well block) Format F RT² Profiler PCR Array, Roche LightCycler 480 (384-well block) Format G RT² Profiler PCR Array, Fluidigm® BioMark™ Format H Sample & Assay Technologies Description The Human Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) Signaling Pathway RT² Profiler PCR Array profiles the expression of 84 genes central to TLR-mediated signal transduction and innate immunity. The TLR family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) detects a wide range of bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Each receptor binds to specific ligands, initiates a tailored innate immune response to the specific class of pathogen, and activates the adaptive immune response. -
TLR Signaling Pathways
Seminars in Immunology 16 (2004) 3–9 TLR signaling pathways Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira∗ Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, and ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan Abstract Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been established to play an essential role in the activation of innate immunity by recognizing spe- cific patterns of microbial components. TLR signaling pathways arise from intracytoplasmic TIR domains, which are conserved among all TLRs. Recent accumulating evidence has demonstrated that TIR domain-containing adaptors, such as MyD88, TIRAP, and TRIF, modulate TLR signaling pathways. MyD88 is essential for the induction of inflammatory cytokines triggered by all TLRs. TIRAP is specifically involved in the MyD88-dependent pathway via TLR2 and TLR4, whereas TRIF is implicated in the TLR3- and TLR4-mediated MyD88-independent pathway. Thus, TIR domain-containing adaptors provide specificity of TLR signaling. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: TLR; Innate immunity; Signal transduction; TIR domain 1. Introduction 2. Toll-like receptors Toll receptor was originally identified in Drosophila as an A mammalian homologue of Drosophila Toll receptor essential receptor for the establishment of the dorso-ventral (now termed TLR4) was shown to induce the expression pattern in developing embryos [1]. In 1996, Hoffmann and of genes involved in inflammatory responses [3]. In addi- colleagues demonstrated that Toll-mutant flies were highly tion, a mutation in the Tlr4 gene was identified in mouse susceptible to fungal infection [2]. This study made us strains that were hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide [4]. aware that the immune system, particularly the innate im- Since then, Toll receptors in mammals have been a major mune system, has a skilful means of detecting invasion by focus in the immunology field. -
Targeting Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 9 and Myeloid Cell Leukaemia 1 in MYC-Driven B-Cell Lymphoma
Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 and myeloid cell leukaemia 1 in MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma Gareth Peter Gregory ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4170-0682 Thesis for Doctor of Philosophy September 2016 Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Doctor of Philosophy Submitted in total fulfilment of the degree of Abstract Aggressive B-cell lymphomas include diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma and intermediate forms. Despite high response rates to conventional immuno-chemotherapeutic approaches, an unmet need for novel therapeutic by resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The proto-oncogene MYC is strategies is required in the setting of relapsed and refractory disease, typified frequently dysregulated in the aggressive B-cell lymphomas, however, it has proven an elusive direct therapeutic target. MYC-dysregulated disease maintains a ‘transcriptionally-addicted’ state, whereby perturbation of A significant body of evidence is accumulating to suggest that RNA polymerase II activity may indirectly antagonise MYC activity. Furthermore, very recent studies implicate anti-apoptotic myeloid cell leukaemia 1 (MCL-1) as a critical survival determinant of MYC-driven lymphoma. This thesis utilises pharmacologic and genetic techniques in MYC-driven models of aggressive B-cell lymphoma to demonstrate that cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) and MCL-1 are oncogenic dependencies of this subset of disease. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, dinaciclib, and more selective CDK9 inhibitors downregulation of MCL1 are used -
TLR4 Signalling
RESEA r CH HIGHLIGHTS INNATE IMMUNITY TLR4 signalling Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is unique plasma membrane. Now, a study from sufficient to allow TRAM to localize among TLRs in its ability to activate Ruslan Medzhitov’s laboratory shows specifically to endosomes. These 20 two distinct signalling pathways that the two signalling pathways amino acids constitute a bipartite — one pathway is activated by the are induced sequentially and that localization domain — consisting of adaptors TIRAP (Toll/interleukin-1- the TRAM–TRIF pathway is only a myristoylation motif (the first 7 receptor (TIR)-domain-containing operational from early endosomes amino acids) and a polybasic domain adaptor protein) and MyD88, following endocytosis of TLR4. — that is commonly found in other which leads to the induction of The authors found it puzzling proteins that shuttle between the pro‑inflammatory cytokines, and that TLR4 is the only known TLR plasma membrane and endosomes. the second pathway is activated by capable of inducing the production Mutational analysis showed that the the adaptors TRIF (TIR-domain- of type I interferons from the plasma myristoylation motif is necessary containing adaptor protein inducing membrane so they decided to take for endosomal localization but interferon‑β) and TRAM (TRIF- a closer look at TLR4 signalling. both parts of the bipartite motif related adaptor molecule), which First, they assessed the subcellular are required for plasma-membrane leads to the induction of type I inter- localization of tagged TLR4 and found targeting. A TRAM transgene of ferons. Until now, it had been believed that it localized to both the plasma which the protein product resided that these two signalling pathways membrane and endosomal vesicles. -
Eradicating Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells by IRAK1/4 Inhibitors
Eradicating chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells by IRAK1/4 inhibitors Yosuke Tanaka ( [email protected] ) The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Tsuyoshi Fukushima The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Keiko Mikami The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Shun Tsuchiya Juntendo University Moe Tamura The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Keito Adachi The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Terumasa Umemoto Kumamoto University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-9003 Naoki Watanabe Juntendo University Soji Morishita Juntendo University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-0130 Misa Imai Juntendo University Masayoshi Nagasawa Juntendo University Marito Araki Juntendo University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-5000 Hitoshi Takizawa International Research Center for Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 5276-5430 Tomofusa Fukuyama The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709- 3188 Chrystelle Lamagna Rigel Esteban Masuda Rigel Ryoji Ito Central Institute for Experimental Animals https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-2332 Susumu Goyama The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Norio Komatsu Juntendo University Tomoiku Takaku Juntendo University Toshio Kitamura The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo Article Keywords: chronic myeloid leukemia, leukemia stem cells, imatinib, IRAK1/4, PD-L1 Posted Date: May 20th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-449398/v1 -
IRAK1: Oncotarget in MDS and AML
www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, Vol. 5, No. 7 Editorial Material IRAK1: oncotarget in MDS and AML Levi J. Beverly and Daniel T. Starczynowski is a serine/threonine kinase that mediates signals from Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection Toll-like receptor (TLR) and Interleukin-1 Receptor of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) disorders that consist of (IL1R) (Figure 1). Following receptor activation, IRAK1 blood cytopenias, marrow dysplasia, and a predisposition becomes phosphorylated which then leads to recruitment to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 30% of TRAF6. This interaction between IRAK1 and TRAF6 of MDS patients go on to develop aggressive AML. MDS activates NF-κB, MAPK, AKT and other pathways. is fatal in a majority of patients as a result of marrow The molecular source of IRAK1 overexpression and/ failure, immune dysfunction, and/or transformation to or hyperactivation in MDS (or AML) is not conclusive overt leukemia. Allogeneic HSC transplantation can (Figure 1) [2]. Overexpression of TLR or necessary be curative in MDS, but this option is suitable only in cofactors in MDS clones may result in chronic IRAK1 the small proportion of younger patients. Alterative activation even in the absence of infection [3, 4]. treatment options for MDS include demethylating agents Small molecule inhibitors targeting IRAK1 (IRAK1/4 and immunomodulatory therapies. Disappointingly, the Inhibitor. Amgen Inc.) have been originally developed efficacy and durability of the remaining treatment options for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Given that is variable. Targeted therapies have been effective in IRAK1 is hyperactivated (i.e., phosphorylated) in MDS multiple myeloid diseases, and may also be effective in but not normal marrow cells, we reasoned that inhibiting MDS by inhibiting the propagating clones. -
A Comparative Survey of Functional Footprints of EGFR Pathway Mutations in Human Cancers
Oncogene (2014) 33, 5078–5089 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/14 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE A comparative survey of functional footprints of EGFR pathway mutations in human cancers A Lane1,4, A Segura-Cabrera1,4 and K Komurov1,2,3 Genes functioning in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways are among the most frequently activated oncogenes in human cancers. We have conducted a comparative analysis of functional footprints (that is, effect on signaling and transcriptional landscapes in cells) associated with oncogenic and tumor suppressor mutations in EGFR pathway genes in human cancers. We have found that mutations in the EGFR pathway differentially have an impact on signaling and metabolic pathways in cancer cells in a mutation- and tissue-selective manner. For example, although signaling and metabolic profiles of breast tumors with PIK3CA or AKT1 mutations are, as expected, highly similar, they display markedly different, sometimes even opposite, profiles to those with ERBB2 or EGFR amplifications. On the other hand, although low-grade gliomas and glioblastomas, both brain cancers, driven by EGFR amplifications are highly functionally similar, their functional footprints are significantly different from lung and breast tumors driven by EGFR or ERBB2. Overall, these observations argue that, contrary to expectations, the mechanisms of tumorigenicity associated with mutations in different genes along the same pathway, or in the same gene across different tissues, may be highly different. We present evidence that oncogenic functional footprints in cancer cell lines have significantly diverged from those in tumor tissues, which potentially explains the discrepancy of our findings with the current knowledge.