DOCSLIB.ORG

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan August 2018 Updated January 27, 2021 Prepared for Quittapahilla Watershed Association Prepared by Clear Creeks Consulting Funded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Growing Greener Grant Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Prepared for Quittapahilla Watershed Association Prepared by Clear Creeks Consulting Funded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Growing Greener Grant August 2018 Updated January 27, 2021 Acknowledgements The Quittapahilla Watershed Association would like to acknowledge our partners and the following individuals and organization who provided technical and financial support in producing the Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan. Contributing Individuals: • Bill Beck, Project Identification & Prioritization Committee, QWA • Russell Collins, President, Doc Fritchey Chapter Trout Unlimited • Kelly Cottingham, Public Education, Participation & Outreach Committee, QWA • Kent Crawford, Quittapahilla Watershed Association • Sean Droms, PhD., Mathematics Professor, Lebanon Valley College, Board of Directors, QWA • Karen Feather, Public Education, Participation & Outreach Committee, QWA • Edward Gibble, Lebanon Valley Conservancy • Lynette Gelsinger, District Manager, Lebanon County Conservation District • Stephanie Harman, Watershed Specialist, Lebanon County Conservation District • Bryan Hoffman, Cleona Borough Authority, Landowner Participation Committee, QWA • Michael Hoffman, Office of State and Watershed Partnerships, Water Protection Division, USEPA • Lee Irwin, Aquatic Resource Restoration Company • David Lasky, Founder and Former President, Quittapahilla Watershed Association • Anne Lasky, Quittapahilla Watershed Association • Rocky O. Powell, Clear Creeks Consulting • Michael Schroeder, PhD., History Professor, Lebanon Valley College, President and Board of Directors, QWA • Mike Snyder, Supervisory District Conservationist, USDA-NRCS • Fred L. Suffian, Non-Point Source Program Manager, Office of State and Watershed Programs, USEPA • Rebecca Urban PhD., Biology Professor, Lebanon Valley College, Board of Directors QWA • Stephan Vegoe, Doc Fritchey Trout Unlimited, Project Identification & Prioritization Committee, QWA • Gary Walters, Division of Water Quality, Monitoring Section, PADEP • Aaron Ward, Chief, Watershed Support Section, Office of Water Resources Planning, PADEP • Alan Wood, Project Identification & Prioritization Committee, QWA Quittapahilla Watershed Association and Restoration Partners: • Aquatic Resource Restoration Company • Clear Creeks Consulting • Cornwall Borough • Doc Fritchey Chapter Trout Unlimited • Lebanon County Clean Water Alliance • Lebanon County Conservation District • Lebanon County Planning Commission • Lebanon Valley Conservancy • Natural Resource Conservation Service - USDA • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Background and Introduction 1 II. Identification of Causes & Sources of Impairment 4 A. Watershed Assessment Methodology 4 1. Watershed Characterization 4 a. Climate 4 b. Basin Morphometry 5 c. Geology 5 d. Soils 5 e. Land Use and Land Cover 5 f. Hydrology 6 1) U.S. Geological Survey Stream Gage Record Analysis 6 2) Field Calibration of Bankfull Discharge 6 3) U.S. Geological Survey Regional Regressions 6 4) Hydrologic Modeling and Analysis 7 5) Mapping 100-Year Floodplains 7 2. Morphological Stream Assessment 8 a. Field Calibration of Bankfull Channel Field Indicators 8 b. Geomorphic Mapping of Quittapahilla Creek 8 c. Morphological Description and Assessment of Stream Condition 9 d. Stream Stability Validation Monitoring 9 3. Subwatershed Analysis 10 a. Level I - Geomorphic Characterization of the Major Tributaries 10 b. Field Reconnaissance 10 4. Ecological Assessment 10 a. Historic Biological Communities 11 b. Evaluation of Existing In-Stream Habitat 11 c. Existing Biological Communities 11 5. Water Quality Assessment 12 a. Historic Water Quality Conditions 12 b. Water Quality Monitoring 12 c. Evaluation of Sediment Discharge 12 d. Water Quality Modeling and Analysis 13 e. Point Source Discharges 13 B. Watershed Assessment Findings 14 1. Watershed Characterization 14 a. Physiography 14 b. Climate 14 c. Basin Morphometry 15 d. Geology and Soils 15 e. Land Use and Land Cover 16 f. Hydrology 22 1) U.S. Geological Survey Stream Gage Record Analysis 22 2) Field Calibration of Bankfull Discharge 22 3) U.S. Geological Survey Regional Regressions 23 4) 100 Year Floodplains 23 5) Hydrologic Modeling and Analysis 23 a) Modeling Points 25 b) Precipitation Inputs 26 c) Procedures and Parameters 26 d) Model Results 27 e) Comparison of Peak Flow Estimates 28 2. Morphologic Stream Assessment 29 a. Introduction 29 b. Field Calibration to Verify Bankfull Channel Field Indicators 29 c. U.S. Geological Survey Regional Regressions 29 d. Geomorphic Mapping of Quittapahilla Creek 30 e. Morphological Description and Assessment of Stream Condition 31 f. Stream Stability Validation Monitoring 35 g. Findings of Channel Morphology and Stability Assessment 36 1) General Overview of Stream Conditions 36 2) Detailed Descriptions of Main Stem Segments 36 Segment 1 37 Segment 2 38 Segment 3 40 Segment 4 42 Segment 5 46 Segment 6 48 3. Subwatershed Analyses 51 a. Introduction 51 b. Field Reconnaissance Findings 51 1) General Comments 51 2) Channel Stability 51 3) Agricultural Activities 52 4) Stream Bank Fencing Program 52 5) Other Streamside Agricultural Best Mgmt. Practices 53 6) Logging and Lumber Mills 55 7) Quarries 55 8) Development 55 9) Channel Alterations 55 10) Flow Diversions 56 11) Fish Barriers 57 12) Fish Habitat Structures 57 4. Ecological Assessment 57 a. Introduction 57 b. Historical Biological Communities 58 c. Trout Stocking in the Quittapahilla Creek Watershed 58 d. Evaluation of Existing In-Stream Habitat 59 1) Rationale 59 2) Detailed Description of Main Stem Segments 60 Segment 1 60 Segment 2 61 Segment 3 62 Segment 4 63 Segment 5 64 Segment 6 65 e. Existing Biological Communities 66 1) Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities 67 2) Fish Communities 76 3) Station by Station Summary of Existing Biological Communities 78 Station Q1 78 Station Q2 82 Station Q3 82 Station Q4 83 Station Q5 84 Station Q6 84 Snitz Creek 85 Beck Creek 86 Bachman Run 87 Killinger Creek 88 4) Ecological Assessment Summary 89 5. Water Quality Assessment 91 a. Introduction 91 b. Historic Water Quality Conditions 92 c. Existing Water Quality Conditions 92 1) Baseflow Water Quality Monitoring 93 2) Storm Flow Water Quality Monitoring 93 3) Findings of the Water Quality Monitoring Program 94 4) Evaluation of Sediment Discharge 98 5) Water Quality Modeling and Analysis 101 a) General Overview Rationale and Methodology 101 b) Refinements to Modeling Approach 102 c) Substitution of More Detailed Data 102 d) Model Calibration 105 e) Model Application and Results 107 d. Point Source Discharges 115 III. Expected Load Reductions 117 A. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) 117 B. Modeling Pollutant Loadings in Quittapahilla Creek Watershed 118 C. Pollutant Loading Reductions 121 IV. Proposed Management Measures 135 A. Introduction 135 B. Restoration Approach 136 1. Traditional Approaches 136 2. Fluvial Geomorphologic (FGM) Approach 137 3. Level of Intervention 138 4. Designing the Stable Channel Form 141 a. Empirical Relations 141 b. Reference Reach Concept 141 c. Design Objectives 141 5. Channel Stabilization Techniques 141 a. Streambank Stabilization 141 b. Streambed Stabilization 144 c. Flow Diverting Techniques 149 6. Floodplain and Wetland Restoration 151 C. The Restoration and Management Plan 154 1. Identification of Potential Restoration and Management Measures 154 2. Evaluation of the Feasibility of Site Specific Measures 154 3. Prioritization of Site Specific Measures 154 D. Restoration and Management Measures Proposed for the WIP 155 1. The Current WIP Planning Process 155 2. Prioritized Projects 156 V. Schedule and Milestones 188 A. General 188 B. Subwatershed Restoration Projects 190 1. Phase 1 – Snitz Creek 190 2. Phase 2 – Killinger Creek 192 3. Phase 3 – Beck Creek 194 4. Phase 4 – Bachman Run 196 C. Mainstem Restoration Projects 198 1. Phase 1 – Upper Mainstem 198 2. Phase 2 – Lower Mainstem 200 3. Phase 3 – Unnamed Tributary 202 VI. Load Reduction Evaluation Criteria 204 A. Quantitative Measures of Implementation Progress and Pollution Reduction 204 B. Qualitative Measures of Overall Program Success 205 C. Water Quality Indicator Milestone 206 1. Baseline Conditions 206 2. Incremental Improvements 206 a. General 206 b. Biological 207 c. Physical In-Stream Habitat 207 d. Temperature 207 e. Dissolved Oxygen 207 D. Adaptive Management Approach 207 VII. Monitoring Program 210 A. Monitoring of Restoration Projects 210 B. Monitoring within Subwatersheds (Tributaries) 212 C. Monitoring at Fixed Stations 212 1. Geomorphic and In-Stream Habitat Assessment 214 2. Biological Monitoring 214 3. Water Quality Monitoring 215 a. Water Quality Monitoring Objectives 215 b. Water Quality Monitoring Plan 216 c. Water Quality Monitoring Schedule 216 VIII. Information, Education, and Public Participation 219 I. Project Background and Introduction The Quittapahilla Creek Watershed is situated in the Ridge and Valley physiographic region in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. Quittapahilla Creek is a tributary to Swatara Creek and is part of the Susquehanna River Basin. Its headwaters begin just southeast of Lebanon, Pennsylvania
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014
    Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014 NY 6 NTN Stations 9 7 10 8 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 Western Shore 12 15 14 Potomac 16 13 17 Rappahannock York 19 21 20 23 James 18 22 24 25 26 27 41 43 84 37 86 5 55 29 85 40 42 45 30 28 36 39 44 53 31 38 46 MD 32 54 33 WV 52 56 87 34 4 3 50 2 58 57 35 51 1 59 DC 47 60 62 DE 49 61 63 71 VA 67 70 48 74 68 72 75 65 64 69 76 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: All Stations NTN Stations 91 NY 6 NTN New Stations 9 10 8 7 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 12 Western Shore 92 15 16 Potomac 14 PA 13 Rappahannock 17 93 19 95 96 York 94 23 20 97 James 18 98 100 21 27 22 26 101 107 24 25 102 108 84 86 42 43 45 55 99 85 30 103 28 5 37 109 57 31 39 40 111 29 90 36 53 38 41 105 32 44 54 104 MD 106 WV 110 52 112 56 33 87 3 50 46 115 89 34 DC 4 51 2 59 58 114 47 60 35 1 DE 49 61 62 63 88 71 74 48 67 68 70 72 117 75 VA 64 69 116 76 65 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiatives Master Spreadsheet Prelim Final 061813.Xlsx
    Summary of Lebanon County Clean Water Initiatives Land use where BMP applied (crop, pasture, pervious Implementation related Subwatershed where Organization responsible General recommendations Document Name Document Date Prepared For BMP/Project Amount of BMP Watershed(HUC10) Municipality of Proposed BMP Developed land, impervious Priority Ranking Watershed Threats to:Outreach, Public Education, Notes BMP implemented for implementation for action Developed land, Policy ag/suburban/urban) Lancaster Dauphin and Lebanon Counties. Majority of focus is Provides a list of restoration increased res. And non‐res. Chiques and East within Lancaster County. Headwaters of these streams located within Lebanon Chiques and East $75000 to develop restoration plan for the Chiques/Susquehanna Tri‐County Conewago protection initiatives and development/ stormwater, 2003 1 Restoration Plan Conewago Creek (State Municipalities within the Co. They are attaining their designated uses. Conewago Creek WRAS Conewago Creek River Creek Association (TCCCA funding when the report was increase water demand Water Plan Subbasin 07G) watersheds in Lebanon are South Provides TMDL info written (2003). affecting stream baseflow Londonderry, West Cornwall and Cornwall stream restoration ‐ all other Chiques Creek Chiques Creek Watershed stream restoration (identified in report as 2002 1200 Chiques Chiques West Cornwall forested reaches identified were in geomorphic and habitat assessments performed Watershed Assessment Association reach C11) Lancaster County Soil conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Implementation Plan
    Watershed Implementation Plan Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Prepared by: Quittapahilla Watershed Association May 2013 Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Table of Contents Background of Quittapahilla Creek Watershed.................................................................... 1 Historic and Current Impairments ............................................................................................ 2 Total Maximum DailyLoads ......................................................................................................... 3 Watershed Modeling of Total Maximum Daily Loads ........................................................................ 4 Loading Targets and Reductions ............................................................................................... 5 Existing and Future BMP .............................................................................................................. 9 Prioritization .................................................................................................................................. 35 Technical and Financial Assistance ....................................................................................... 31 Accomplishments of Quittapahilla Watershed Association ......................................... 37 Implementation Schedule .......................................................................................................... 38 Funding Sources ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elodea Genus: Egeria Or Elodea Family: Hydrocharitaceae Order: Hydrocharitales Class: Liliopsida Phylum: Magnoliophyta Kingdom: Plantae
    Elodea Genus: Egeria or Elodea Family: Hydrocharitaceae Order: Hydrocharitales Class: Liliopsida Phylum: Magnoliophyta Kingdom: Plantae Conditions for Customer Ownership We hold permits allowing us to transport these organisms. To access permit conditions, click here. Never purchase living specimens without having a disposition strategy in place. The USDA does not require any special permits to ship and/or receive Elodea except in Puerto Rico, where shipment of aquatic plants is prohibited. However, in order to continue to protect our environment, you must house your Elodea in an aquarium. Under no circumstances should you release your Elodea into the wild. Primary Hazard Considerations Always wash your hands thoroughly before and after you handle your Elodea, or anything it has touched. Availability Elodea is available year round. Elodea should arrive with a green color, it should not be yellow or “slimy.” • Elodea canadensis—Usually bright green with three leaves that form whorls around the stem. The whorls compact as they get closer to the tip. Found completely submerged. Is generally a thinner species of Elodea. Has a degree of seasonality May–June. • Egeria densa—Usually bright green with small strap-shaped leaves with fine saw teeth. 3–6 leaves form whorls around the stem and compact as they get closer to the tip. Usually can grow to be a foot or two long. Is thicker and bushier than E. canadensis. Elodea arrives in a sealed plastic bag. Upon arrival, this should be opened and Elodea should be kept moist, or it should be placed in a habitat. For short term storage (1–2 weeks), Elodea should be placed in its bag into the refriger- ator (4 °C).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Proposed Regulation
    REVISED 12/16 INDEØTg%ORV Regulatory Analysis Form (Completed by PromulgatingAgency) Wfl[: >ic (All Comments submitted on this regulation will appear on IRRC’s website) Mt. — 4 (1) Agency I Environmental Protection Thdepenqp Rf&uIt -Ui, Review r,.qu; (2) Agency Number: 7 Identification Number: 548 IRRC Number: (3) PA Code Cite: 25 Pa. Code Chapter 93 (4) Short Title: Water Quality Standards — Class A Stream Redesignations (5) Agency Contacts (List Telephone Number and Email Address): Primary Contact: Laura Edinger; 717.783.8727; ledingerpa.gov Secondary Contact: Jessica Shirley; 717.783.8727; jesshirleypa.gov (6) Type of Rulemaking (check applicable box): Proposed Regulation El Emergency Certification Regulation El Final Regulation El Certification by the Governor El Final Omitted Regulation El Certification by the Attorney General (7) Briefly explain the regulation in clear and nontechnical language. (100 words or less) The amendments to Chapter 93 reflect the list of recommended redesignations of streams as embedded in the attached Water Quality Standards Review Stream Redesignation Evaluation Report. The proposed regulation will update and revise stream use designations in 25 Pa. Code § 93.9d, 93.9f, 93.9j, 93.9k, 93.91, 93.9m, 93.9p, 93.9q, 93.9r, and 93.9t. These changes will not impose any new operating requirements on existing wastewater discharges or other existing activities regulated by the Department under existing permits or approvals. If a new, increased or additional discharge is proposed by a permit applicant, more stringent treatment requirements and enhanced best management practices (BMPs) may be necessary to maintain and protect the existing quality of those waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Streams
    Kayaking Small Streams The Yellow Breeches Creek, Cumberland County, is a great location to start your small stream kayak experience. It offers miles of easy paddling along with a water trail that highlights the paddling opportunities on this stream and provides maps that point out easy access. by Carl Haensel photos by the author Slip your kayak into the water off a country road in rural Pennsylvania, and your cares soon fade away. The forest glides by you on either side as you slip over riffles and float under bridges. Eight or ten miles pass in an afternoon as you explore a watershed far off the beaten path. A day like this spent kayaking on a small Pennsylvania stream is a day to be savored. Here are some tips, tricks and highlighted sections where you may find your own small-stream idyll. Paddling on a small stream What is small stream kayaking? For our use, a small stream in Pennsylvania is one that is less likely to receive Mixing fishing with kayaking is a great option while paddling small motorboat traffic and is best navigated by paddling. There Pennsylvania streams. Often, there are top-notch opportunities for are many streams that fit these criteria throughout the fishing for smallmouth bass, trout and other species. Target deep- Commonwealth from short, steep, rapid filled creeks water areas with good cover for fish such as large logs or other to placid, winding pastoral streams. While all paddlers submerged debris in the water. should be prepared when they hit the water, paddlers on small streams need to take extra care, because they are out of the way locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decade of Progress for the West Branch Susquehanna Restoration
    WestA DECADE OF PROGRESS Branch FOR THE Susquehanna Restoration Initiative 2004–2014 A. WOLFE 1 Foreword PA Fish and Boat Commission Executive Director, John Arway In 2012, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) staff surveyed the upper reaches of the West Branch Susquehanna River in Cambria County and discovered a naturally reproducing wild trout population. The abandoned mine drainage (AMD) remediation efforts, including the Lancashire 15 treatment plant, have improved water quality to PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION FISH AND BOAT PA the point where there are now wild trout in the West Branch! With the recently funded Twomile Run project in the lower Kettle Creek watershed and proposed remediation at the abandoned Fran Contracting site in the Cooks Run watershed, there is a great potential to recover significant miles of naturally reproducing brook trout streams in the near future. Another major recent accomplishment is the AMD remediation work that improved water quality in more than forty miles of the Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek. The partnership between government, industry and the public working together on reclamation activities and AMD treatment has allowed PFBC cooperative nurseries to stock a portion of the Bennett Branch in 2013, and the PFBC will be adding a preseason stocking to a 4.5 mile reach in the Medix Run/Benezette area for 2014. Additionally, a 2.8 mile section of the West Branch near Curwensville will receive a preseason trout stocking for the first time in 2014. A. WOLFE These are some exciting times in the West Branch Susquehanna watershed and we look forward to more improvements in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions and Revisions January 2019
    Notice Classification of Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions and Revisions January 2019 Under 58 Pa. Code §57.11 (relating to listing of wild trout streams), it is the policy of the Fish and Boat Commission (Commission) to accurately identify and classify stream sections supporting naturally reproducing populations of trout as wild trout streams. The Commission’s Fisheries Management Division maintains the list of wild trout streams. The Executive Director, with the approval of the Commission, will from time-to-time publish the list of wild trout streams in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. The listing of a stream section as a wild trout stream is a biological designation that does not determine how it is managed. The Commission relies upon many factors in determining the appropriate management of streams. At the next Commission meeting on January 14 and 15, 2019, the Commission will consider changes to its list of wild trout streams. Specifically, the Commission will consider the addition of the following streams or portions of streams to the list: County of Mouth Stream Name Section Limits Tributary To Mouth Lat/Lon UNT to Chest 40.594383 Cambria Headwaters to Mouth Chest Creek Creek (RM 30.83) 78.650396 Hubbard Hollow 41.481914 Cameron Headwaters to Mouth West Creek Run 78.375513 40.945831 Carbon Hazle Creek Headwaters to Mouth Black Creek 75.847221 Headwaters to SR 41.137289 Clearfield Slab Run Sandy Lick Creek 219 Bridge 78.789462 UNT to Chest 40.860565 Clearfield Headwaters to Mouth Chest Creek Creek (RM 1.79) 78.707129 41.132038 Clinton
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018
    Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018 Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer and Joel D. Blomquist, U.S. Geological Survey, March 2, 2020 The Chesapeake Bay nontidal network (NTN) currently consists of 123 stations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Stations are located near U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream-flow gages to permit estimates of nutrient and sediment loadings and trends in the amount of loadings delivered downstream. Routine samples are collected monthly, and 8 additional storm-event samples are also collected to obtain a total of 20 samples per year, representing a range of discharge and loading conditions (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2020). The Chesapeake Bay partnership uses results from this monitoring network to focus restoration strategies and track progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay. Methods Changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended-sediment loads in rivers across the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been calculated using monitoring data from 123 NTN stations (Moyer and Langland, 2020). Constituent loads are calculated with at least 5 years of monitoring data, and trends are reported after at least 10 years of data collection. Additional information for each monitoring station is available through the USGS website “Water-Quality Loads and Trends at Nontidal Monitoring Stations in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed” (https://cbrim.er.usgs.gov/). This website provides State, Federal, and local partners as well as the general public ready access to a wide range of data for nutrient and sediment conditions across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In this summary, results are reported for the 10-year period from 2009 through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Conewago Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Update
    Conewago Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Update Plan Sponsors: Tri-County Conewago Creek Association Report Prepared by: January 2021 Contents Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... v Units of Measure ......................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction and Project Background ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Previous Watershed Planning in the Conewago Creek Watershed ............................................. 1 1.2 Clean Water Act Section 319 Eligibility ......................................................................................... 3 2. Watershed Description .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Land use ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Soils ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]