DOCSLIB.ORG

E Island, Claiming That He Is Able and Authorized to Speak for and on Behalf of the Whole Population of Cyprus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
E Island, Claiming That He Is Able and Authorized to Speak for and on Behalf of the Whole Population of Cyprus DEC- . ••ffAL TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS PRESIDENT'S OFFICE Lefkosa via Mersin 10 Turkey E. Mail: [email protected] - Web Page : www.trncpresidency.org 5 November 2004 Excellency, My term of office as President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is ending in April 2005 and I do not intend to run for another term. The Greek Cypriot leader Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos, elected solely by the Greek Cypriots of Cyprus, has once again been allowed to address the General Assembly of the United Nations in his false capacity as the President of the whole island, claiming that he is able and authorized to speak for and on behalf of the whole population of Cyprus. This may well be the last letter I will be writing to you as the President of the TRNC. I will therefore use this opportunity, as someone who has actively tried for the last fifty years to bring sustainable peace and stability to Cyprus through a political arrangement based on the political equality of the two co- owner peoples of the island, to share my thoughts with you again making specific reference to the statement of Mr. Papadopoulos at the General Debate of the 59th Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on 29 September 2004. I hope and expect that you will bear with me and with my comprehensive expose since I strongly believe that unless we correct the course now regarding the direction in which we are heading for a "so called settlement" in Cyprus we may in fact be preparing the ground for even more serious trouble and instability in the island and in the region in future. H.E. Mr. Kofi ANNAN e i i ^ Secretary-General of the United Nations DEC -2 New York. EOSG / CENTRAL To start with, let me point out once again that there is no legal foundation, no legitimacy in the Greek Cypriot claim that an administration composed of one hundred percent Greek Cypriots is the legitimate government of the Republic of Cyprus. This Republic was a bi-national partnership Republic established under the international Cyprus Treaties of 1959/60 on 16 August 1960, with equal political powers vested in both co-founder partners, who elected their representatives separately, one not having the right to speak for or represent the other. As is well-known there has been no such joint government in the island since 1963, as a result of the coup against the partnership state by Archbishop Makarios and his team of "leaders", in line with the notorious Akritas Plan which has been published as a UN document under Document No. A/33/115; S/12722 dated 30 May 1978. The treatment afforded to the Greek Cypriot side by the world at large as "the legitimate government of Cyprus" - in spite of its record of bloodshed, terrorism, defiance of the rule of law, the declaration that the Constitution is dead and buried, and the importation of Greek arms and troops to the tune of 20,000 in contravention of Security Council Resolutions - has been the main obstacle to a negotiated settlement. The Greek Cypriot leadership which had failed to achieve its aim of converting the island into a Greek Cypriot Republic (and Turkish Cypriots into a protected minority) prior to uniting the island with Greece, was deprived of any scintilla of motivation for a negotiated settlement when its unilateral application for EU membership was accepted by the EU as a proper application on behalf of the whole island. A partnership settlement would be contrary to the "national will and testament" of Archbishop Makarios to the effect that by what he had done (i.e. constituting a 100% Greek Cypriot administration as the government of the Republic of Cyprus) he had brought Cyprus to the nearest point to Enosis (union with Greece) and no one should make concessions on this, except for Enosis! This is the only main, incontrovertible reason for the non-settlement of the Cyprus problem over the years. The acceptance of this one-legged "partnership state" as a candidate and now a full member of the EU has finally blocked the way to any settlement short of the unconditional submission of the Turkish Cypriot side to the political will of the Greek Cypriot administration. With this short introduction I would like to further analyse the Statement of Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos at the General Assembly: It hurts the Turkish Cypriot people to listen to Mr. Papadopoulos talk about his "concerted efforts to eliminate terrorism and its underlying causes" when he has publicly lied to the Khaleej Times of 4 September 2004, by declaring that there was not one single Turkish Cypriot killed during the 1963- 2 1974 period. The era of terror and terrorism cannot be obliterated from the minds of Turkish Cypriots, especially when mass graves of civilians, including 16-day old babies, children from one year old to 14-15 years old, aged people of 70-90 years old have been massacred just because they were Turkish Cypriots, who opposed Enosis and defended their vested rights as co-founder partners of the defunct Republic of 1960. The unforgivable sin of Turkish Cypriots was not accepting the Greek Cypriot administration as "the legitimate government of Cyprus" and not bowing to the offer to become a minority in a Greek Cyprus as recorded by Mr. Glafcos Clerides in his memoirs MY DEPOSITION Vol. 3, page 237. Greek Cypriot Aim "The aim of the Greek Cypriot Constitutional policy in the talks was a moderate modification of the Plaza plan, which provided limited participation of the Turks in the organs of the independent state of Cyprus, always on a minority basis. This policy also did not succeed, because the Turkish side, though more flexible, remained unretreating on the issue of accepting a minority status for the Turkish Cypriots." (From the memoirs of Mr. Glafcos Clerides, former Greek Cypriot Leader, MY DEPOSITION, Vol. 3 ,p. 23 7) For this sin, 30,000 Turkish Cypriots had to vacate 103 villages and take refuge in safer areas. Moving from one area to another carried the risk of abduction by Greek Cypriot police and the gunmen attached to them. The then Secretary-General reported in his Report of 12 December 1964 to the Security Council that 209 Turkish Cypriots were still missing for the period 1 September 1964 to 12 December 1964 and that there seemed to be little prospect of finding them alive! The dead and wounded from 1963 - 1974 run to more than one thousand. And Mr. Papadopoulos, like his predecessors, has the cheek to claim that not a single Turkish Cypriot was killed during this period, that the Cyprus problem began with the arrival of Turkish troops in 1974 and that the problem was one of occupation and the resultant movement of people who should be entitled to go back to their homes, while claiming that property ownership is a human right which has to be honoured at all costs. The property rights of Turkish Cypriots who were driven away from 103 villages from 1963 to 1974; and the rights of all of the Turkish Cypriot population who left everything in the South after the 1975 Population Exchange Agreement mean nothing to the Greek Cypriot leadership. Mr. Papadopoulos is on record as saying that Turkish Cypriot claims will be taken up after the settlement of the Cyprus problem, which as I indicated above, will have to wait until eternity, i.e. the time Turkish Cypriots will bow to Greek Cypriot domination and accept to be a minority in a Greek Cyprus! Mr. Papadopoulos alleges that the Republic of Cyprus (meaning the one they hijacked in name, and destroyed in fact) "supports the strengthening of the UN system". If so, he should stop exploiting the UN system by falsely alleging at UN platforms that he represents Cyprus and that "the problem" started in 1974 with the arrival of Turkey. At least the UN knows that the problem arose eleven years earlier in 1963, because UNFICYP has been stationed in Cyprus since March 1964 in order to prevent the utter destruction of the Turkish Cypriot people. If Mr. Papadopoulos is sincere on his views about the Israeli-Palestinian question, then it is high time he had a second look at Cyprus, where violence ended only with the arrival of Turkey in 1974, saving not only Turkish Cypriot lives but also tens of thousands of Greek Cypriot lives. The then Secretary- General of AKEL, the Greek Cypriot communist party, is on record saying that ten thousand AKEL members were on the "execution list of the Junta"! So, what Mr. Papadopoulos wants for the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, namely "the arrest of violence", has already happened in Cyprus, thanks to the sacrifices of Turkey, who lost nearly one thousand lives in her attempt to bring peace and stability to the island. Mr. Papadopoulos wants more emphasis to be given to improving living conditions in order to normalize people's lives to the greatest possible extent. How decent of him to say so, but in Cyprus he has followed exactly the contrary policy for forty years in order to bring Turkish Cypriots to heel, and even now, in EU circles, he is doing his utmost in order to prevent the EU honouring its promises to the Turkish Cypriot side that it would lift embargoes if they voted "yes" in the referendum! Such a hypocritical approach should not be "let past" by the United Nations. Again Mr. Papadopoulos says, and I quote, "Our support remains focused on the end of the occupation and on a just and viable settlement, based on UN resolutions and for the realization of the aspirations of the Palestinian people for the establishment of an independent state, living side by side with Israel, in conditions of sustainable peace and security." Applying the same phraseology and logic, Turkish Cypriots have been seeking a viable, sustainable peace and security for the last forty years and have been waiting for the end of the occupation of the seat of the partnership government by the Greek Cypriot side.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations and Related Issues
    Order Code RL33497 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations and Related Issues June 27, 2006 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations and Related Issues Summary Cyprus has been divided since 1974. Greek Cypriots, 76% of the population, live in the southern two-thirds of the island. Turkish Cypriots, 19% of the populace, live in the “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” (TRNC), recognized only by Turkey, with about 36,000 Turkish troops providing security. United Nations peacekeeping forces (UNFICYP) maintain a buffer zone between the two. Since the late 1970s, the U.N., with U.S. support, has promoted negotiations aimed at reuniting the island as a federal, bicommunal, bizonal republic. In recent times, the U.N. Secretary General’s April 5, 1992, “Set of Ideas” was a major, but unsuccessful, framework for negotiations for an overall settlement. Next, both sides accepted U.N. confidence-building measures only in principle and they were never recorded nor implemented. The prospect of Cyprus’s European Union (EU) accession and its eventual membership intensified and complicated settlement efforts. After five rounds of U.N.-mediated proximity (indirect) talks beginning in December 1999, Secretary General Kofi Annan presented his “observations” on substance and procedure on November 8, 2000, leading Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf Denktash to withdraw from the talks for a year. Denktash and (Greek) Cypriot President Glafcos Clerides finally met on December 4, 2001 and agreed to begin direct talks on January 16, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Accession Treaty
    23.9.2003EN Official Journal of the European Union 17 TREATY BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, IRELAND, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND, THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION) AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN UNION HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF DENMARK, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE
    [Show full text]
  • 15 June 2004 Excellency, Thank You for Your Letter of 7 June 2004
    06/14/2004 MON 17:24 FAI 1 212 963 3829 1002 THE 15 June 2004 Excellency, Thank you for your letter of 7 June 2004, about my report on my good offices mission on Cyprus (S/2004/437), dated 28 May 2004, and our meeting of 3 June 2004. As you will have inferred from my report, I take a different view from you on most of the ground covered in your letter and its annex. I do stand fully by my report, including the narrative and the analysis contained therein, the appeals 1 have formulated and the recommendations I have put forward, to which I hope the Greek Cypriot side will respond positively, it follows that 1 do not share your characterization of the conduct of the effort by the United Nations. Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration. Kofi A. Annan His Excellency Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos Nicosia 06/14/2004 MON 17:24 FAX 1 212 963 3828 1003 H 6 H 1 If JUN U2004 Note to Mr Riza EXEC_. LETTER TO MR PAPADOPOULOS OFTHESECfl Thank you for Informing me of the Secretary-General's preference not to /f sign the draft letter to Mr Papadopoulos that I sent for his consideration /I last week. I understand the Rrtocrjpolemics with / ree with him. That is why, in my earlier note informing him of Mr Papadopoulos' letter (and despite my inclination to demolish him point-by-poiut) I recommended a very restrained response, avoiding to engage him on the substance. The purpose of the very spare draft i seint, with the improvements suggested "by Mr Prendergastj was jrjcis«^MSit'ojf cutting off P?teroics_and bringing closure while at the same timei dispetllng" aiiy impression that we acquiesce to Papadopbuios' arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crux of the Cyprus Problem
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS September - November 1999 Volume IV - Number 3 THE CRUX OF THE CYPRUS PROBLEM RAUF R. DENKTAŞ His Excellency Rauf R. Denktaş is President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Anthony Nutting, who was the British Minister of State at the Foreign Office during the period 1954-56, wrote in his book I Saw for Myself his impression following talks with the leaders of Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots: “There is nothing Cypriot about Cyprus except its name. In this beautiful beleaguered island you are either a Greek or a Turk. From the leaders of the two communities downwards the chasm of suspicion and hatred which separates them is frighteningly wide.”1 EOKA terrorism, which aimed to unite the island with Greece (enosis), was at its height and the Turkish Cypriots, who looked upon enosis as changing colonial masters for the worst, resisted it with every means at their disposal. Hence, the message passed on to all young Greek Cypriots was, “the struggle against the real enemy of our nation and religion, the remnants of the occupying power in Cyprus, will commence as soon as the fight for enosis comes to a successful conclusion”! Any Greek Cypriot who saw the futility and the danger of the drive for enosis, and thus supported independence as a more suitable solution, was regarded as a traitor to the national cause and murdered by EOKA (the Greek Cypriot terrorist organisation). In fact, everyone who opposed enosis was declared an enemy and lived under a constant threat. All Turkish Cypriots were against enosis! By 1957, inter-communal clashes assumed the character of a civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Raymond Saner
    Book chapter in “Unfinished Business”, editor.Guy Olivier Faure, The University of Georgia Press, Atlanta, Georgia and London, 2012. Copyright with Publisher CYPRUS CONFLICT: WILL IT EVER END IN AGREEMENT? Raymond Saner ABSTRACT The goal of this chapter is to describe factors, which have contributed to the persistent failures of peace negotiations on Cyprus. In particular, the author attempts to delineate the impact which multiple and competing external stakeholders (influential foreign powers, supranational institutions, intergovernmental organizations and NGOs from various countries) have had on the peace process and how these third parties (first level GR and TR, secondary level USA, UK, EU and UNO) have used the Cyprus conflict for their own strategic aims and secondary gains by offering their influence to the two conflict parties (Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots). As a result of these ongoing external stakeholders interferences, the Cyprus conflict has persisted and negotiation behavior of the primary conflict parties became characterized by opportunistic tactical maneuvers prolonging and deepening non-agreement ever since the peace enforcing presence of UN forces on the island starting in 1974 and lasting up to the writing of this article. BRIEF SUMMARY OF CYPRUS CONFLICT 2002-JANUARY 2006 1,2 In January 2002, direct talks under the auspices of Secretary-General Annan began between Republic of Cyprus President Glafcos Clerides (Greek community) and Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf Denktash (Turkish Community). In November 2002, UN Secretary-General Annan released a comprehensive plan for the resolution of the Cyprus issue. It was revised in early December. In the lead up to the European Union's December 2002 Copenhagen Summit, intensive efforts were made to gain both sides' signatures to the document prior to a decision on the island's EU membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus Crisis (8)” of the Kissinger- Scowcroft West Wing Office Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 7, folder “Cyprus Crisis (8)” of the Kissinger- Scowcroft West Wing Office Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 7 of The Kissinger-Scowcroft West Wing Office Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Gerald R. Ford Library 1000 Beat ~v.enue . Ann Arbor. Ml 48109-2114 · ·· www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov Withdrawal Sheet for Documents Declassified in Part This.-folder contains a document or documents declassified in part under the Remote Archive Capture (RAC) program. Procedures for Initiating a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Request The still classified portions of these RAC documents are eligible for MDR. To file a request follow these steps: 1. Obtain the Presidential Libraries Mandatory Review Request Form (NA Form 14020). 2. Complete Sections I, II , and Ill of NA Form 14020. 3. In Section Ill, for each document requested, simply provide the Executive Standard Document Number (ESDN) in the Document Subject!Title or Correspondents column.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 4 June 2007
    United Nations S/2007/328 Security Council Distr.: General 4 June 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Operation in Cyprus I. Introduction 1. The present report on the United Nations operation in Cyprus covers developments from 25 November 2006 to 25 May 2007, and brings up to date the record of activities carried out by the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) pursuant to Security Council resolution 186 (1964) and subsequent Council resolutions, the most recent being resolution 1728 (2006). 2. As at 30 April 2007, the strength of the military component stood at 856 all ranks and the strength of the police component stood at 64 (see annex). II. Mission of good offices and other developments 3. On 15 December, the Security Council adopted resolution 1728 (2006), by which, inter alia, it expressed full support for the process agreed upon by the Greek Cypriot leader, Tassos Papadopoulos, and the Turkish Cypriot leader, Mehmet Ali Talat, on 8 July 2006, and encouraged active participation in bicommunal discussions as described in the letter dated 15 November 2006 from the then Under-Secretary-General Ibrahim Gambari, to which both leaders had responded positively, under the auspices of my Special Representative. The Security Council called for the early completion of the preparatory phase so that a fully fledged good offices process might resume as soon as possible. At the same time, the Council regretted the continued lack of trust between the parties, which had prevented the implementation of the 8 July agreement. 4. Over the past six months, my Special Representative has continued efforts aimed at facilitating the implementation of the 8 July agreement (see S/2006/572) through intensive discussions with the two leaders and their representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus - President Clerides” of the National Security Adviser’S Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 1, folder “Cyprus - President Clerides” of the National Security Adviser’s Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 1 of the NSA Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ~ N~TIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ovember 11 Denis Clift believes the attached should be closed out . If the resident: 'vants to 'vrite Clerides at this time, which Denis does not necessarily reco~mend , we 'vould have to start afresh. Close out ---#~~~e ~a-n_n_e Dav ~ Reopen? _________ ~~ SEGRET"-­ ~ ~/<1JI';,+/ -:: , NAtiONAL SECURITY COUNCIL 11/11/74 MEMORANDUM FOR JEANNE W. DAVIS Jeanne - I believe the chronology of the attached -- ie, 8/28-9/27 is self-evident. It is OBE. If the President wants to write Clerides we will have to start afresh. RECOMMENDATION .· : ~' '', Close out the attache~~ ~ A. Denis Clift \( I lel" eve this one was returned by HAK ask ng that the figures be updated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974- 1983
    Journal of History Culture and Art Research (ISSN: 2147-0626) Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2020 DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v9i3.1973 Citation: Kıralp, Ş. (2020). The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974- 1983. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 400-414. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.1973 The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974-1983 Şevki Kıralp1 Abstract This paper conducts historical research on the inter-communal talks and the political life in the two communities of Cyprus from 1974 to 1983. The period covered by the research commenced with the creation of the bi-regional structure on the island in 1974 and ceased with the declaration of Turkish Cypriot Independence in 1983. As this period constitutes an important threshold in the history of Cyprus, it might be argued that observing the political developments it covers is likely to be beneficial for the literature. The research focused on the two communities’ positions in negotiations as well as their elections and political actors. It utilized Turkish, Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot newspapers (and official press releases), political leaders’ memoirs, national archives of USA (NARA) as well as official online documents. Its findings indicate that the two sides could not reach to a settlement mainly due to their disagreements on the authorities of central and regional governments. While the Turkish Cypriot side promoted broader authorities for the regional governments, the Greek Cypriot side favoured broader authorities for the central government. On the other hand, while Turkish Cypriot leader Denktaş had managed to unite the majority of Turkish Cypriot right-wing voters, the Greek Cypriot right-wing was divided among supporters of Makarios and Clerides.
    [Show full text]
  • Impediments to the Solution of the Cyprus Problem by Glafcos Clerides
    Addressing the Future Impediments to the Solution of the Cyprus Problem by Glafcos Clerides Glafcos Clerides was born in Nicosia, Cyprus, in 1919. He volunteered for the British Royal Air Force in World War II. After his airplane was shot down over Germany in 1942, he remained a prisoner until the end of the war. He received his L.L.B. degree from King’s College, University of Lon- don, in 1948. Among the positions he has held are president of the Cyprus Red Cross, leader of the Democratic Rally Party, and head of numerous delegations addressing the Cyprus problem. He was elected president of the Republic of Cyprus in 1993 and reelected in 1998. He addressed the Se- ton Hall University community on September 24, 1999. At the outset, I would like to say to the students of the School of Diplomacy who I met today—don’t be disappointed because you will hear how difficult it is to solve a simple problem. In order to grasp the meaning and the difficulties we face in trying to solve the Cyprus problem, I should give you a very short background of how it came about. Then I will tell you about the situation: the difficulties that were created by military operations and by the invasion of Cyprus. And finally, I will try to give you my feel- ings about the future and how the problem could be solved. Cyprus has a very strategic position in the eastern Mediterranean. Most nations from Europe who wanted to conquer Africa or Asia stepped over Cyprus, and most Asian nations who wanted to conquer European countries, again, stepped over Cy- prus.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CYPRUS REVIEW a Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues
    V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 THE CYPRUS REVIEW A Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues The Cyprus Review, a Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues, P.O. Box 24005 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus. Telephone: 22-353702 ext 301, 22-841500 E-mail: [email protected] Telefax: 22-353682, 22-357481, www.unic.ac.cy To access site: > Research > UNic Publications Subscription Office: The Cyprus Review University of Nicosia 46 Makedonitissas Avenue 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus Copyright: © 2010 University of Nicosia, Cyprus. ISSN 1015-2881. All rights reserved. No restrictions on photo-copying. Quotations from The Cyprus Review are welcome, but acknowledgement of the source must be given. TCR Editorial Team Guest Editor: Costas M. Constantinou Editor in Chief: Hubert Faustmann Co-Editors: James Ker-Lindsay Craig Webster Book Reviews Editor: Olga Demetriou Managing Editor: Nicos Peristianis Assistant Editor: Christina McRoy EDITORIAL BOARD V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 Costas M. Constantinou University of Nicosia, Cyprus Ayla Gürel Cyprus Centre of International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Maria Hadjipavlou University of Cyprus Mete Hatay Cyprus Centre of International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Yiannis E. Ioannou University of Cyprus Joseph Joseph University of Cyprus Michael Kammas Director General, Association of Cyprus Commercial Banks Erol Kaymak Political Science Association, Cyprus Diana Markides University of Cyprus Caesar Mavratsas University of Cyprus Farid Mirbagheri University of Nicosia, Cyprus Maria Roussou The Pedagogical Institute of Cyprus / Ministry of Education & Culture, Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Centre for the Study of Migration, Inter-ethnic and Labour Relations/ University of Nicosia and PRIO Cyprus Centre INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 Peter Allen John T.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
    Cyprus Page 1 of 13 Cyprus Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003 Prior to 1974, Cyprus experienced a long period of intercommunal strife between its Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities. In response the U.N. Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) began operations in March 1964. The island has been divided since the Turkish military intervention of 1974, following a coup d'etat directed from Greece. Since 1974 the southern part of the island has been under the control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. The northern part is ruled by a Turkish Cypriot administration. In 1983 that administration proclaimed itself the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" ("TRNC"). The "TRNC" is not recognized by the United States or any country except Turkey. A buffer zone patrolled by the UNFICYP separates the two parts. A substantial number of Turkish troops remained on the island. Glafcos Clerides was reelected President of the Republic of Cyprus in 1998. In April 2000, following the first round of Turkish Cypriot elections, Rauf Denktash was declared "President" after "Prime Minister" Dervish Eroglu withdrew. The judiciary is generally independent in both communities. Police in the government-controlled area and the Turkish Cypriot community were responsible for law enforcement. Police forces in the government-controlled area were under civilian control, while the Turkish Cypriot police forces were under military authority. Some members of the police on both sides committed abuses. Both Cypriot economies operated on the basis of free market principles, although there were significant administrative controls in each community.
    [Show full text]