And the Winners Are

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And the Winners Are 8 | 2014 Dispute Resolution Awards And the winners are... Angola Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Securities Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Canada International Mediation Institute Mediator of the Year: Angola Fillmore Riley Professional Negligence Litigator of the Year: Canada Argentina Geoffrey Vale, Arbitrator Maritime Arbitrator of the Year: Canada Marval O’Farrell & Mairal Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Argentina Hunter Litigation Chambers Dispute Resolution Chambers of the Year: Canada Kaufman Laramée Civil Litigator of the Year: Canada Australia Kelly International Settlement Services Inc. Transportation Disputes Specialist of the Year: Allens Litigator of the Year: Australia Canada Campbell Bridge SC Mediator of the Year: Australia McLauchlin & Associates Construction Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Clayton Utz Class Action Law Firm of the Year: Australia Canada Gilbert + Tobin Overall Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: McMillan LLP Insurance Litigator of the Year: Canada Australia McMillan LLP Competition & Antitrust Litigator of the Year: Gordon Smith, Independent Arbitrator Arbitrator of the Year: Australia Canada Herbert Smith Freehills Insurance Disputes Specialist of the Year: Australia McNamee Mediation Arbitration Commercial Mediator of the Year: Canada Maddocks Employment Litigator of the Year: Australia Michael Silver Mediator Inc. Med-Arbs Specialist of the Year: Canada Resource Dispute Resolution Pty Ltd Expert Determination Firm of the Year: Australia Miskin Law Offices Asbestos-Related Litigator of the Year: Canada Seven Wentworth Maritime Disputes Barrister of the Year: Australia Palaire Roland Rosenberg Rothstein Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigator of the Year: Canada Austria Parker Mediation-Arbitration, Inc. Labour & Employment Dispute Specialist of the Becker Anton Cross Border Disputes Advisory Firm of the Year: Year: Canada Austria Parker Mediation-Arbitration, Inc. Third Party Investigator of the Year: Canada BLS Rechtsanwälte Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Austria Prof. Alan Levy Collective Agreements Specialist of the Year: bpv Hugel Rechtsanwalte Competition & Antitrust Dispute Specialist of the Canada Year: Austria Singleton Urquhart LLP Commercial Property Disputes Specialist of the Dorda Brugger Jordis Rechtsanwälte GmbH Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Austria Year: Canada Graf Patsch Taucher Rechtsanwälte Banking & Finance Dispute Specialists of the Year: Singleton Urquhart LLP Professional Liability Disputes Specialist of the Austria Year: Canada Griss & Partner International Claims Settlement Firm of the Year: Stern Landesman Clark LLP Criminal Defence Law Firm of the Year: Canada Austria Stout Dispute Resolution Inc Independent Investigator of the Year: Canada Hasch & Partner Anwaltsgesellschaft mbH Employment Litigator of the Year: Austria The Hon. Marc Lalonde, O.C. P.C. Q.C. Commercial Arbitrator of the Year: Canada Karasek Wietrzyk Tax Disputes Specialist of the Year: Austria Woods LLP Boutique Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Konfliktkultur - Kulturkonflikt Mediator of the Year: Austria Year: Canada KWR Overall Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Austria Cayman Islands Platte Rechtsanwalt Boutique Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Appleby Corporate Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Cayman Austria Islands SMP Schweiger Mohr Partner Rechtsanwälte Civil Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Austria Walkers Insolvency Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Specht Böhm Rechtsanwalt GmbH Civil Litigators of the Year: Austria Cayman Islands Universität Wien Academic Institution of the Year: Alternative Dispute Resolution Chile Ürge & Cernohlávek Intellectual Property Disputes Specialist of the CorreaGubbins Boutique Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Austria Year: Chile Willheim Müller Rechtsanwälte Media Dispute Specialists of the Year: Austria Estudio Juridico Otero Labour & Employment Dispute Specialist of the Year: Chile Belgium FerradaNehme Economic Litigator of the Year: Chile Maritime Consultants Bvba Belgian Overseas Arbitration Specialist of the Year: London China WilmerHale Competition & Antitrust Dispute Specialist of the Deacons Commercial Litigation Law Firm of the Year: China Year: Belgium Grandall Law Firm, China High Profile Case Litigators of the Year: China Vera Van Houtte - Independent Arbitrator Infrastructure Disputes of the Year: Belgium Haley & Co in association with Clayton Utz Infrastructure Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Altius International Arbitration Specialist of the Year: China Belgium Herbert Smith Freehills Emerging Market Dispute Specialist of the Year: Altius (in cooperation with Tiberghien) Commercial Property Disputes Specialist of the China Year: Belgium King & Wood Mallesons Competition & Antitrust Dispute Specialist of the Afschrift Tax Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Belgium Year: China Strelia Mediation Specialist of the Year: Belgium Lehman Lee & Xu Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: China University of Macau Legal Faculty of the Year: Dispute Resolution Bolivia Bufete Aguirre Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Bolivia Colombia Estudios Palacios Lleras SA Litigator of the Year: Colombia Botswana Triana, Uribe & Michelsen ADR Law Firm of the Year: Colombia Luke & Associates Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Botswana Croatia Brazil Divjak, Topic & Bahtijarevic Law Firm Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Croatia Advocacia Waltenberg Energy Disputes Litigator of the Year: Brazil Wolf Theiss Arbitrators of the Year: Croatia Cascione Pulino Boulos & Santos Competition & Antitrust Litigator of the Year: Brazil Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada Center Commitment to Excellence & Education: Cyprus for Arbitration and Mediation Dispute Resolution Institution of the Year Tassos Papadopoulos & Associates Banking Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Cyprus Escritório Jurídico Carbone Maritime Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Brazil Montanios & Montanios Maritime Dispute Specialist of the Year: Cyprus Jose Emilio Nunes Pinto Advogados Energy Disputes Arbitrator of the Year: Brazil L.O. Baptista, Schmidt, Valois, Miranda, Ferreira, Agel Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Brazil Czech Republic Stocche Forbes Padis Filizzola Clápis Advogados Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Brazil Glatzová & Co Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: TozziniFreire Advogados Tax Disputes Specialist of the Year: Brazil Czech Republic Kotrlik Bourgeault Andrusko International Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Bulgaria Czech Republic Boyanov & Co Overall Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: KPMG CEE Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year Bulgaria Peterka & Partners Shareholder Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Djingov Gouginski Kyutchukov & Velichkov Financial Services Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Czech Republic Bulgaria Pierstone Corporate Litigator of the Year: Czech Republic Weinhold Legal Domestic Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Czech Canada Republic Allan S. Blott, Q.C., Professional Corporation Personal Injury Litigator of the Year: Canada of Lawyers Denmark Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Oil & Gas Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Canada Moalem Weitemeyer Bendtsen Financial Services Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Chris Albertyn, Arbitrator & Mediator Workplace Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Canada Denmark Emery Jamieson LLP Shareholder Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Canada www.acquisition-intl.com 2014 Dispute Resolution Awards | 9 Ecuador Scholtka and Partner Environmental Dispute Specialist of the Year: Bustamante & Bustamante Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Ecuador Germany SKW Schwarz Rechtsanwälte Mediation Law Firm of the Year: Germany Egypt Speckin, Dembski & Partner European Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Ackad Law Office Franchise Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Egypt Germany Nassar Law Arbitration Team of the Year: Egypt Thümmel, Schütze & Partner, Rechtsanwälte Forensic Dispute Specialist of the Year: Germany Zaki Hashem & Partners Construction Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Egypt Gibraltar Estonia Massias & Partners Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Gibraltar Eversheds Ots & Co ADR Law Firm of the Year: Estonia Glikman Alvin & Partnerid Competition & Antitrust Disputes Law Firm of the Greece Year: Estonia A&K Metaxopoulos and Partners Law Firm Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Greece Sorainen Litigation Firm of the Year: Estonia Bahas, Gramatidis & Partners Product Liability Specialist of the Year: Greece KPP Law - Kerameus, Papademetriou, Competition & Antitrust Dispute Law Firm of the Finland Papadopoulos Law Offices Year: Greece Attorneys at Law Borenius Ltd Financial Services Disputes Firm of the Year: Lambadarios Law Firm Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Greece Finland PotamitisVekris Cross Border Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Backström & Co Attorneys Litigation Law Firm of the Year: Finland Greece Kalliolaw Asianajotoimisto Oy Corporate Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Finland PotamitisVekris Employment & Labour Dispute Specialist of the Lindfors & Co Attorneys at Law Ltd International Arbitration Specialist of the Year: Year: Greece Finland V&P Law Firm Commercial Litigator of the Year: Greece Peltonen Ruokonen & Itäinen Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year: Finland V&P Law Firm Shareholder Disputes Law Firm of the Year: Waselius & Wist Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Finland Greece France Guatemala BDO France Arbitration Support Firm of the Year: France Consortium Centro America Abogados Arbitration Law Firm of the Year: Guatemala Bredin Prat Commercial Litigator of the Year: France Mayora &
Recommended publications
  • Accession Treaty
    23.9.2003EN Official Journal of the European Union 17 TREATY BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, IRELAND, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND, THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION) AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN UNION HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF DENMARK, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE
    [Show full text]
  • 15 June 2004 Excellency, Thank You for Your Letter of 7 June 2004
    06/14/2004 MON 17:24 FAI 1 212 963 3829 1002 THE 15 June 2004 Excellency, Thank you for your letter of 7 June 2004, about my report on my good offices mission on Cyprus (S/2004/437), dated 28 May 2004, and our meeting of 3 June 2004. As you will have inferred from my report, I take a different view from you on most of the ground covered in your letter and its annex. I do stand fully by my report, including the narrative and the analysis contained therein, the appeals 1 have formulated and the recommendations I have put forward, to which I hope the Greek Cypriot side will respond positively, it follows that 1 do not share your characterization of the conduct of the effort by the United Nations. Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration. Kofi A. Annan His Excellency Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos Nicosia 06/14/2004 MON 17:24 FAX 1 212 963 3828 1003 H 6 H 1 If JUN U2004 Note to Mr Riza EXEC_. LETTER TO MR PAPADOPOULOS OFTHESECfl Thank you for Informing me of the Secretary-General's preference not to /f sign the draft letter to Mr Papadopoulos that I sent for his consideration /I last week. I understand the Rrtocrjpolemics with / ree with him. That is why, in my earlier note informing him of Mr Papadopoulos' letter (and despite my inclination to demolish him point-by-poiut) I recommended a very restrained response, avoiding to engage him on the substance. The purpose of the very spare draft i seint, with the improvements suggested "by Mr Prendergastj was jrjcis«^MSit'ojf cutting off P?teroics_and bringing closure while at the same timei dispetllng" aiiy impression that we acquiesce to Papadopbuios' arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 4 June 2007
    United Nations S/2007/328 Security Council Distr.: General 4 June 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Operation in Cyprus I. Introduction 1. The present report on the United Nations operation in Cyprus covers developments from 25 November 2006 to 25 May 2007, and brings up to date the record of activities carried out by the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) pursuant to Security Council resolution 186 (1964) and subsequent Council resolutions, the most recent being resolution 1728 (2006). 2. As at 30 April 2007, the strength of the military component stood at 856 all ranks and the strength of the police component stood at 64 (see annex). II. Mission of good offices and other developments 3. On 15 December, the Security Council adopted resolution 1728 (2006), by which, inter alia, it expressed full support for the process agreed upon by the Greek Cypriot leader, Tassos Papadopoulos, and the Turkish Cypriot leader, Mehmet Ali Talat, on 8 July 2006, and encouraged active participation in bicommunal discussions as described in the letter dated 15 November 2006 from the then Under-Secretary-General Ibrahim Gambari, to which both leaders had responded positively, under the auspices of my Special Representative. The Security Council called for the early completion of the preparatory phase so that a fully fledged good offices process might resume as soon as possible. At the same time, the Council regretted the continued lack of trust between the parties, which had prevented the implementation of the 8 July agreement. 4. Over the past six months, my Special Representative has continued efforts aimed at facilitating the implementation of the 8 July agreement (see S/2006/572) through intensive discussions with the two leaders and their representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974- 1983
    Journal of History Culture and Art Research (ISSN: 2147-0626) Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2020 DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v9i3.1973 Citation: Kıralp, Ş. (2020). The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974- 1983. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 400-414. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.1973 The Inter-Communal Talks and Political Life in Cyprus: 1974-1983 Şevki Kıralp1 Abstract This paper conducts historical research on the inter-communal talks and the political life in the two communities of Cyprus from 1974 to 1983. The period covered by the research commenced with the creation of the bi-regional structure on the island in 1974 and ceased with the declaration of Turkish Cypriot Independence in 1983. As this period constitutes an important threshold in the history of Cyprus, it might be argued that observing the political developments it covers is likely to be beneficial for the literature. The research focused on the two communities’ positions in negotiations as well as their elections and political actors. It utilized Turkish, Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot newspapers (and official press releases), political leaders’ memoirs, national archives of USA (NARA) as well as official online documents. Its findings indicate that the two sides could not reach to a settlement mainly due to their disagreements on the authorities of central and regional governments. While the Turkish Cypriot side promoted broader authorities for the regional governments, the Greek Cypriot side favoured broader authorities for the central government. On the other hand, while Turkish Cypriot leader Denktaş had managed to unite the majority of Turkish Cypriot right-wing voters, the Greek Cypriot right-wing was divided among supporters of Makarios and Clerides.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CYPRUS REVIEW a Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues
    V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 THE CYPRUS REVIEW A Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues The Cyprus Review, a Journal of Social, Economic and Political Issues, P.O. Box 24005 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus. Telephone: 22-353702 ext 301, 22-841500 E-mail: [email protected] Telefax: 22-353682, 22-357481, www.unic.ac.cy To access site: > Research > UNic Publications Subscription Office: The Cyprus Review University of Nicosia 46 Makedonitissas Avenue 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus Copyright: © 2010 University of Nicosia, Cyprus. ISSN 1015-2881. All rights reserved. No restrictions on photo-copying. Quotations from The Cyprus Review are welcome, but acknowledgement of the source must be given. TCR Editorial Team Guest Editor: Costas M. Constantinou Editor in Chief: Hubert Faustmann Co-Editors: James Ker-Lindsay Craig Webster Book Reviews Editor: Olga Demetriou Managing Editor: Nicos Peristianis Assistant Editor: Christina McRoy EDITORIAL BOARD V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 Costas M. Constantinou University of Nicosia, Cyprus Ayla Gürel Cyprus Centre of International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Maria Hadjipavlou University of Cyprus Mete Hatay Cyprus Centre of International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Yiannis E. Ioannou University of Cyprus Joseph Joseph University of Cyprus Michael Kammas Director General, Association of Cyprus Commercial Banks Erol Kaymak Political Science Association, Cyprus Diana Markides University of Cyprus Caesar Mavratsas University of Cyprus Farid Mirbagheri University of Nicosia, Cyprus Maria Roussou The Pedagogical Institute of Cyprus / Ministry of Education & Culture, Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Centre for the Study of Migration, Inter-ethnic and Labour Relations/ University of Nicosia and PRIO Cyprus Centre INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD V O L U M E 2 2 N U M B E R 2 Peter Allen John T.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus: Time for a Negotiated Partition? (WP)
    Cyprus: Time for a Negotiated Partition? (WP) William Chislett Area: Europe Working Paper 21/2010 5/7/2010 Elcano Royal Institute Madrid – Spain http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng 1 Cyprus: Time for a Negotiated Partition? (WP) William Chislett * Contents (1) Summary (2) Background and Current Situation (3) Property: No Headway (4) Direct Trade Directive: A Ray of Hope (5) Turkey’s Position (6) Missing People: Public Broadcasting Breaks a Taboo (7) Spain’s Efforts to Resolve the Cyprus Problem during its EU Presidency (8) Conclusion Appendices (a) Timelines (b) Letters by Demetris Christofias, President of the Republic of Cyprus, and Derviş Eroğlu, President of the TRNC, to Ban Ki‐Moon, the UN Secretary General, in April 2010 (c) Basic Statistics of the Republic of Cyprus and of the TRNC (d) Representative Offices Abroad of the TRNC Selected Bibliography (1) Summary The Greek‐ and Turkish‐Cypriot leaders renewed negotiations in May for reunifying Cyprus, the only divided country in the EU. Little progress of substance was made during 19 months of talks between Demetris Christofias, the Greek‐Cypriot President, and Mehmet Ali Talat, the former President of the internationally unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), who was defeated in April by the more hard‐line Derviş Eroğlu. The international community is becoming increasingly frustrated by the lack of progress on a settlement and the idea of a negotiated partition is gaining credence. * Journalist and writer, author of one Working Paper on Cyprus
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in CYPRUS 17Th February 2013
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN CYPRUS 17th February 2013 European Elections monitor The rightwing opposition leader Nicos Anastassiades is the favourite in the Cypriot Presidential Corinne Deloy Translated by helen Levy Election Abstract : On 4th January last the first round of the Cypriot Presidential election was officially set for 17th Analysis February next. Although 11 people are running in this election three candidates stand out from the rest: Nicos Anastassiades, leader of the Democratic Assembly (DISY); former Healthcare Minister (2011-2012), Stavros Malas, member of the Progressive Workers’ Party (AKEL) and former Foreign Minister (2006-2007), George Lilikas, supported by the Social Democratic Movement (EDEK) led byYiannakis Omirou. Outgoing Head of State, Demetris Christofias (AKEL), in office since the election of 17th and 24th February 2008 indicated in May last that he did not want to run for a second mandate. He is the first President of the Cypriot Republic not to run for a second term. 40 polling stations will be open in 26 countries for Cypriots living abroad (around 15,000). In all, the number of voters totals 545,000. If none of the candidates wins the absolute majority on 17th February a second round of voting will take place on 24th February. The Candidates suffrage for a five year mandate. Head of the execu- The Cypriot Constitution dates back to 1960 but has tive, he appoints the government ministers which he not been in application since the intra-community leads. 30% of the seats in government and the Vouli conflict of 1963. According to this text the Presiden- antiprosopon (Chamber of Representatives, the only tial office is reserved to a Cypriot, and the Vice-Pres- chamber in the Cypriot Parliament) ie 24 out of 80 idency to a Turk (the post is vacant at present).
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations
    Order Code IB89140 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations Updated May 19, 2005 Carol Migdalovitz Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Past Settlement Efforts 1977 Makarios-Denktash Meeting 1979 Kyprianou-Denktash Communique 1984 Proximity Talks 1985-86 U.N. Draft Framework Exercise 1988-89 Talks March 1990 - April 1992 Set of Ideas Confidence-Building Measures Proximity Talks Developments, 2002-2003 November 11, 2002, Annan Plan 2004 Referenda and After Other Factors Affecting the Talks Domestic Politics in Cyprus Policies of Greece and Turkey European Union U.N. Peacekeeping Forces U.S. Policy IB89140 05-19-05 Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations SUMMARY Cyprus has been divided since 1974. gave the two leaders his “observations” on Greek Cypriots, nearly 80% of the population, substance and procedure. In reaction, live in the southern two-thirds of the island. Denktash withdrew from talks. He and Turkish Cypriots live in the “Turkish Republic Clerides met on Cyprus on December 4, 2001, of Northern Cyprus” (TRNC, recognized only and began direct talks on January 16, 2002. by Turkey), with about 36,000 Turkish troops On November 11, Annan submitted a compre- providing security. United Nations (U.N.) hensive settlement plan based on Swiss and peacekeeping forces maintain a buffer zone Belgian models. Greek Cypriots and Turkish between the two. Since the late 1970s, the Cypriots failed to agree on it at an EU summit U.N., with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Blow to the Reunification of Cyprus (ARI)
    Area: Europe ARI 74/2010 Date: 21/4/2010 Electoral Blow to the Reunification of Cyprus (ARI) William Chislett* Theme: The defeat of Mehmet Ali Talat in the presidential election of 18 April in the internationally unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) and the victory of Dervish Eroglu, the Prime Minister, dealt a potentially severe blow to the chances of reunifying Cyprus, the only divided country in Europe. Summary: Talat was more disposed to reach an agreement for a unified state than Eroglu, who, at least in public, favours separate states. But his 70 rounds of talks over two years with Demetris Christofias, the Greek Cypriot leader and President of the Republic of Cyprus, did not produce a comprehensive settlement. Cyprus has been split into Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities since Turkey’s invasion in 1974 in response to inter communal strife and a military coup backed by the junta ruling Greece at the time (see Figure 1). The Cyprus issue has a direct bearing on Turkey’s ailing bid to become a full EU member. Figure 1. Cyprus Source: BBC. Analysis: The negotiations between Talat and Christofias were widely regarded as a unique window of opportunity for reunification as both leaders were on a similar ideological wavelength and were viewed as more pragmatic than their predecessors.1 But their 70 meetings produced little apparent progress. Few details were announced as they were held under the philosophy of ‘no agreement until everything is agreed’. The talks ended on 30 March because of the election in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC).
    [Show full text]
  • Heads of State Or Government
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN 13295/04 (Presse 290) PRESS RELEASE 2620th Council Meeting HEADS OF STATE OR GOVERNMENT Brussels, 5 November 2004 President Mr Jan Peter BALKENENDE Prime Minister of the Netherlands P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0) 2 285 9548 / 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 285 8026 [email protected] http://ue.eu.int/Newsroom 13295/04 (Presse 290) 1 EN 5.XI.2004 Main Results of the Council The Council, meeting at the level of Heads of State or Government, and by common accord with Commission President-designate Barroso, adopted a Decision adopting an amended list of persons whom the Council intends to appoint as Members of the European Commission for the period from the date of appointment of the new Commission to 31 October 2009. 13295/04 (Presse 290) 2 EN 5.XI.2004 CONTENTS 1 PARTICIPANTS................................................................................................................................ 4 ITEMS DEBATED APPOINTMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 6 OTHER ITEMS APPROVED None 1 Where declarations, conclusions or resolutions have been formally adopted by the Council, this is indicated in the heading for the item concerned and the text is placed between quotation marks. The documents whose references are given in the text are available on the Council's Internet site http://ue.eu.int. Acts adopted with statements for the Council minutes which may be released to the public
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Cypriot Election--I Serencebey Yokuu 61-63/10-11 Beikta Istanbul TURKEY
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT WRITER'S CONSENT INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS PAR-I& American Research Institute in Turkey The Greek Cypriot Election--I Serencebey Yokuu 61-63/10-11 Beikta Istanbul TURKEY February 1986 Mr. Peter Bird Martin Institute of Current World Affairs Wheelock House 4 West Wheel ock Street Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 USA Dear Peter In mid-Oanuary: 1985, Spyros Kyprianou flew to New York to meet with Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf Denkta and UN Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar. In a session that the UN official expected to last no more than an hour, the leaders of the two Cypriot communities were expected to sign a draft agreement that had been painstakingly constructed over the preceding months; then. they would begin discussions on the manner in which some of the more important blanks would be filled in and thereby attempt to prepare the way for working groups to hammer out the remaining details. On the 17th, when Kyprianou declined to sign the agreement as presented and indicated that he considered everything in the document open to renegotiation, Denkta denounced him for negotiating in bad faith; Perez de Cuellar and his aides betrayed pique.: and, for once, the world press took the Turkish side. Within a week, a new joke was making the rounds in southern Cyprus. There was, so the story goes, a dinner party in New York City. Those present included members of the American, the Soviet, and the Cypriot delegations to the United Nations. All concerned had a bit too much to drink and they soon began boasting of their respective country's accomplishments.
    [Show full text]
  • E Island, Claiming That He Is Able and Authorized to Speak for and on Behalf of the Whole Population of Cyprus
    DEC- . ••ffAL TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS PRESIDENT'S OFFICE Lefkosa via Mersin 10 Turkey E. Mail: [email protected] - Web Page : www.trncpresidency.org 5 November 2004 Excellency, My term of office as President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is ending in April 2005 and I do not intend to run for another term. The Greek Cypriot leader Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos, elected solely by the Greek Cypriots of Cyprus, has once again been allowed to address the General Assembly of the United Nations in his false capacity as the President of the whole island, claiming that he is able and authorized to speak for and on behalf of the whole population of Cyprus. This may well be the last letter I will be writing to you as the President of the TRNC. I will therefore use this opportunity, as someone who has actively tried for the last fifty years to bring sustainable peace and stability to Cyprus through a political arrangement based on the political equality of the two co- owner peoples of the island, to share my thoughts with you again making specific reference to the statement of Mr. Papadopoulos at the General Debate of the 59th Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on 29 September 2004. I hope and expect that you will bear with me and with my comprehensive expose since I strongly believe that unless we correct the course now regarding the direction in which we are heading for a "so called settlement" in Cyprus we may in fact be preparing the ground for even more serious trouble and instability in the island and in the region in future.
    [Show full text]