DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy and R&D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implications for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy and R&D Scientizing Science Policy: Implications for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy and R&D Evaluation Gouk Tae Kim Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Science and Technology Studies Saul Halfon, Chair Daniel Breslau Stephen D. Nelson Aaron D. Schroeder July 12, 2012 Blacksburg, Virginia, USA Keywords: science of science policy, government performance management reform, social contract of science, science and technology studies, R&D evaluation Copyright 2012, Gouk Tae Kim Scientizing Science Policy: Implications for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy and R&D Evaluation Gouk Tae Kim ABSTRACT In this dissertation research, I try to deepen the understanding of the logic and history behind the science of science policy approaches and to substitute for this scientific evidence-based science policy model an evidence-critical and -informed model in which scientific and democratic claims are promoted simultaneously. The science of science policy, or what I call the scientizing science policy (SSP) discourse, is a strategic response of science policy community members to the following two socio-political developments: the government performance management reform movement and a new social contract of science. These two developments have motivated the science policy community to construct new science R&D management strategies that make science R&D investment more effective and economically beneficial than before. Former Presidential Science Advisor John Marburger played an important role in articulating an SSP approach at the federal level that opened up a political space for the larger SSP discourse to emerge and take hold. Other heterogeneous science policy community actors, including science agency managers and academic researchers, have also engaged and played major roles in shaping the premises, strategies, and directions that make up the SSP discourse by articulating their own approaches to SSP. The SSP discourse constitutes a series of strategies such as economizing and quantifying R&D investment decisions. In particular, to implement the ideas of performance reform and a new social contract of science in the field of science policy and management, the SSP community members have prioritized the development of data, models, and evidence related to federal R&D investment by funding studies on new scientific data, tools, and quantitative methods through the National Science Foundation (NSF) Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program. Interagency collaboration organized and supported by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is another key feature promoted by the SSP community. Through this research of the rise and development of the SSP discourse, I emphasize the following aspects that are relevant to both science policy practice and research community members. First, the SSP discourse demonstrates the influence of the performance reform movement on science, technology, and innovation policy and R&D management. Second, the SSP discourse has the strong potential to shift science policy makers’ focus from planning and implementing to evaluating federal R&D programs. Third, the SSP discourse not only reflects, but also promotes the tendency of public policy makers, politicians, and the public to rely on scientific claims and evidence when they are engaged in discussions or policy decision making processes related to science and technology. Fourth, the SSP discourse alters the balance of authority and influence among science policy actors, including science agency managers, scientists, and executive branch offices in the decision making process on federal R&D priority and investment. Fifth, even though there are conflicts and disagreements among science policy community members on the visions and future of the NSF SciSIP program, the SSP discourse is valuable as a space in which heterogeneous science policy research and practice community members can interact, learn from each other, and collaborate to develop U.S. science, technology, and innovation policy. I conclude by proposing an evidence-critical and -informed science policy in which the SSP discourse contributes to promoting democratic values in the science policy decision process. In particular, the evidence-critical and -informed model focuses on not only using scientific data and evidence when making federal R&D decisions, but also on promoting the democratic and deliberative process in monitoring R&D activities’ performance and social outcomes. In this model, I view the public as a legitimate stakeholder for evaluating federal R&D investment. This evidence-informed model can be implemented under the SSP discourse if the new R&D data, models, and tools developed by the NSF SciSIP-funded research are coupled with a new government performance website in which the public can access information about federal R&D activities as well as provide feedback about R&D investments to science policy makers. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Dr. Saul Halfon, and my three committee members, including Dr. Daniel Breslau, Dr. Stephen Nelson, and Dr. Aaron Schroeder, for their academic advice in producing my dissertation. I thank Harvard Kennedy School STS fellow program director Dr. Sheila Jasanoff for offering me such a wonderful academic journey in her program to deepen my understanding of STS. I also appreciate for the NSF STS Program for providing a research grant to me for improving my dissertation research. And I would like to special thank to my wife, Eun-Hee Kim, my son, Isaac Jae- Hyun Kim, and my parents for their great support of my study. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1: Introduction………………………....................................................... 1 1. Science of Science Policy Initiative 4 2. Main Research Questions 7 3. Analytical Frameworks to Investigate the SSP Discourse 10 (1) New Social Contract of Science (Chapter 3) 10 (2) Performance Management Reform Movement (Chapter 4-I) 11 (3) Performance Management Reform in Science Policy (Chapter 4- II) 12 (4) International Dynamics of the SSP (Chapter 5) 13 (5) Politics of Science & SSP (Chapter 6) 13 (6) Comparative Analysis (Chapter 7) 16 4. Qualitative Research Methods and Interviews 17 (1) Qualitative Research Methods 18 (2) Design and Goals of Research Interviews 20 5. Benefits and Significance of the Research 23 Chapter 2: Case Analysis: NSF’s SciSIP and OSTP’s SoSP…………………….. 26 1. Science Politics & the Empirical Evidence Based Model 26 (1) Marburger’s Two Keynote Speeches on Scientizing Science Policy 29 (2) OSTP, Interagency Task Group, and the Science of Science Policy Roadmap 32 (3) NSF’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) 37 (4) Congressional Hearing on SciSIP 47 2. The SSP and the New Era of Evaluation of Federal R&D investments 49 (1) Needs for a Developing New Science Policy Evaluation Approach 50 (2) Evaluation of R&D Activities and the SSP 52 (3) SciSIP Funded Research and the Possible Impacts of the SSP on R&D Evaluation 54 (4) Emphasis of Extrinsic Criteria & Large-Scale Data 57 (5) New Ways of Evaluating STI Policies and R&D Programs 58 Chapter 3: Reshaping the Social Contract of Science............................................ 60 1. Definition(s) of Science Policy, Technology Policy and Innovation Policy 60 2. History of the U.S. Science Policy 61 (1) Before World War I 62 (2) Wartime and Post-War Science Policy 66 v (3) Three Phases of Science Policy Development until the 1980s 69 (4) Developing Triple-Helix System 74 3. The Emerging New Social Contract of Science and Science Policy Culture 79 (1) The New Social Contract of Science 79 (2) The Emerging New Science Policy Culture 85 (3) Beyond Science, the Endless Frontier 88 (4) SciSIP and SoSP: New Science Policy Tools 92 Chapter 4: The Government Performance Management Reform Movement in Science Policy........................................................................................... 95 1. SSP, the Arrival of the Government Performance Reform in Science and Science Policy 95 2. Government Performance Management, GPRA and PART 97 (1) GPRA of 1993 99 (2) The President’s Management Agenda and the Program Assessment Rating Tool 103 (3) The PMA and R&D Performance Reform 106 (4) The GPRA Modernization Act – Obama Administration 109 (5) Annual Performance Plan (APP) 112 3. New Relationship Among Scientists, Science Agencies, OMB and White House 114 (1) Performance Reform in Science Policy 117 (2) Balancing Influence and Authority in Governing Science through the SSP 124 (3) Performance Reform in Science Policy & SSP 128 Chapter 5: Interview Data Analysis: External Logics and Internal Dynamics of the SSP…………………………………………………………………... 136 1. Analysis of the Interview Data on the SSP Discourse 138 (1) Diverse Interpretation of the SSP 140 (2) Impacts of the Performance Management/Budget Reform on the SSP 147 (3) Impacts of the Performance Reform & a Revised Social Contract of Science I: Economizing and Mathematizing Federal R&D Decision Making 155 (4) Impacts of the Performance Reform & a Revised Social Contract of Science II: Improved Authority of Scientific Claims
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curfew and Lights out at Eleven O'clock by I
    Curfew and Lights Out at Eleven O'clock By I. Goldstein there was nobody around to party with, the outsiders would University President John Marburger announced yester- stay away. day a new security plan, which involves confining dorm "I think its a great plan," said Josh Freidlan, "it provides for students to their rooms between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and a terrific study environment for those of us who own flash- 6:00 am. He said that this would "real ly keep this campus -lights." secure. There were, however, some opposing viewpoints. Muffy The plan, according to Marburger was proposed by Public Stein said that the plan was unfair as it restricted her shop- Safety director Gary Barrnes. "If the kiddies are in their rooms ping habits. 'What if Bloomingdales has an exclusive sale and are not allowed out for any reason, then they can do no until midnight, I'd have to leave early." harm." The plan requires that by the hour of 11:00 p.m. all resident students must be in their rooms. "In order to curb any students from going outside, the power to all of the dorms and the surrounding areas will be turned off." Marburger said This policy is being instituted since the university cannot afford to pay its $4.1 million LILCO bill, he said "It will be mandatory bedtime." Barnes said that his officers will be instructed to appre- hend students violating the law and mace them. 'This will help deter offenders and keep the officers and myself happy." According to officials at the school, the new policy is the "What about Thursday nights at the E.O.B.?", screamed result of the crimes that have occurred on campus.
    [Show full text]
  • The White House Science Advisor in an Age of Climate Confusion, A
    A Rook or a Pawn: The White House Science Advisor in an Age of Climate Confusion Len Aslanian I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 473 II. -S&T ADVISEMENT IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION ................................... 476 III. S&T ADVISEMENT IN THE OBAMA ERA ............ 483 IV. STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES OF THE SCIENCE ADVISOR .............................................. 487 V. SUGGESTIONS FOR THE SCIENCE ADVISOR .......... 493 I. INTRODUCTION In October 1986, at the height of the American AIDS crisis, the Office of the Surgeon General issued the federal govern- ment's first major report on the disease.* In direct and some- times explicit language, the report detailed the nature, symptoms, and causes of AIDS and called for a nationwide educational cam- paign that included controversial measures such as early child- hood sex education and public promotion of condom use.' Eighteen months later, in the largest public health mailing in US history, a condensed version of the report titled Understanding AIDS was sent to 107 million American households.2 Both versions of the report were personally penned by Presi- dent Reagan's Surgeon General, the bow-tied and billy goat- bearded pediatric surgeon C. Everett Koop.3 A controversial fig- ure due to his evangelical Christian background and anti-abor- 1. See id.; The Reports of the Surgeon General: The AIDS Epidemic, PROFILES IN Sci.: NAT' LIBRARY OF MED., http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/Narrative/NN/ p-nid/62 (last visited June 12, 2011). 2. U.S. Du'r OF HEAIA-rH & HUMAN SERV., UNDERS-TANDING AIDS (1988), avail- able at http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/QQ/B/D/RIU/qqbdrl.pdf; Who is the AAME? C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 52-No. 30 Pg. 1 Copy
    Vol. 52 - No. 30 July 31, 1998 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY Dick Setlow Steps Down as Associate Director, Life Sciences; Returns to Research in BNL’s Biology, Medical Departments After 12 years as Associate Direc- crease human susceptibility to skin tor and two years as Acting Associate cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer Director of Life Sciences, as well as and others. I only regret that there are seven years as Chairman of the Biol- not enough hours in the day for me to ogy Department during his 24 years do both science and administration. at BNL, Richard (Dick) Setlow stepped So — back to science.” down from the Directorship on July 1. After receiving an A.B. degree from He will remain at BNL as Senior Bio- Swarthmore College in 1941, Setlow physicist in the Biology and Medical earned his Ph.D. in physics from Yale Departments. University in 1947. He taught physics “Dick has made many discoveries and biophysics at Yale from 1941 to relating to the process of DNA repair 1961 and studied the quantitative di- in cells, and built research groups in rect effects of ionizing and UV radia- this field at both Oak Ridge National tion on proteins and nucleic acids. Laboratory [ORNL] and BNL,” wrote In 1961, Setlow moved to ORNL to Laboratory Director John Marburger do full-time research, where he and in his announcement of Setlow’s step- coworkers were the first to demon- ping down. “We owe much of the vital- strate that UV light induces struc- ity and productivity of our life sciences tural defects in DNA, the substance here to his leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Georgia Institute of Technology Two Hundredth
    GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY TWO HUNDREDTH AND TWELFTH COMMENCEMENT EXERCISE ALEXANDER MEMORIAL COLISEUM May 4, 2002, 3:00 P.M. (Faculty and President’s Party will assemble at 2:00 p.m. in the Hyder Room, second level of the Coliseum). Processional Ga Tech Brass Ensemble Ron Mendola Master of Ceremonies Dr. G. Wayne Clough President Reflection Mr. Carlton O. Parker Director, YMCA National Anthem Georgia Tech Brass Ensemble Commencement Dr. John H. Marburger III Address Director, Office of Science and Technology Executive Office of the President of the United States 1 Presentation of Dr. Charles Liotta, Vice Provost for Master's Degree Research and Dean of Graduate Studies Candidates Conferring of Degrees Dr. Clough Presentation of Dr. Liotta Doctoral Degree Candidates Conferring of Degrees Dr. Clough Induction into Mr. Albert Thornton Jr., Alumni Association Class of 1968 President, Georgia Tech Alumni Association Presentation of the Mr. Thornton 2000 Outstanding Young Alumna Award Alma Mater Georgia Tech Brass Ensemble, Graduates and Audience Faculty Recessional Georgia Tech Brass Ensemble "Ramblin' Wreck" Graduates and audience 2 May 4, 2002 - Ceremony Script (GRADUATE CEREMONY) (Dr. Clough) Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. Will everyone please stand for the reflection by Mr. Carlton Parker, director of the YMCA, and remain standing for our national anthem. (Carlton Parker) Reflection (Brass Ensemble) National Anthem (Dr. Clough) Please be seated. Once again, good afternoon. It is my pleasure to welcome everyone to Georgia Tech’s two-hundred twelfth commencement exercises. Today we are celebrating the largest commencement in Georgia Tech history, with the individual presentation of 1,847 diplomas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Proposal to Support Us Basic Research Hearing
    S. HRG. 110–1107 THE FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET PROPOSAL TO SUPPORT U.S. BASIC RESEARCH HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND INNOVATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 11, 2008 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 72–808 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:02 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 072808 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\72808.TXT SCOM1 PsN: JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TED STEVENS, Alaska, Vice Chairman JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas BARBARA BOXER, California OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BILL NELSON, Florida GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JIM DEMINT, South Carolina THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware DAVID VITTER, Louisiana CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JOHN THUNE, South Dakota AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi MARGARET L. CUMMISKY, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel LILA HARPER HELMS, Democratic Deputy Staff Director and Policy Director CHRISTINE D. KURTH, Republican Staff Director, and General Counsel PAUL NAGLE, Republican Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND INNOVATION JOHN F.
    [Show full text]
  • 784-785 News MH AY.Indd
    NATUREVol 460|13|Vol August 460|13 2009 August 2009 NEWS HAVE YOUR SAY Comment on any of our News stories, online. www.nature.com/news up a quarter of the mass of the Universe. Finally, one of the most sought-after targets is Science advisers mull priorities the Higgs boson, the only particle predicted by the standard model that has not yet been An elite group of 21 US researchers met under Bush, the council launched in found. The elusive boson is a marker of the publicly for the first time last week as December 2001 with 24 members and Higgs mechanism, which could explain how the new advisory panel to US President expanded to 35 in 2005. PCAST’s previous particles have mass. Barack Obama on scientific and technical incarnation focused more on technology matters. But despite an enthusiastic advice, and it included fewer academic Bad welds inaugural meeting, it will take time to scientists and more business executives. The 2008 accident was caused by a faulty weld know how effective the President’s Council “The best thing about this PCAST is in a section of superconducting wire connect- of Advisors on Science and Technology that it’s up and running earlier in the term ing two magnets. The subsequent months of (PCAST) will be. than the previous one,” says Marburger. At inspections of the rest of the LHC found just PCAST has already put together its the meeting last week, Holdren said that four more bad welds in this type of connec- first report, on the government’s H1N1 the council’s speedy formation was a clear tion — but also revealed a far more widespread pandemic strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • John Marburger (1941-2011) Physicist and Longest-Serving US Presidential Science Adviser
    COMMENT OBITUARY John Marburger (1941-2011) Physicist and longest-serving US presidential science adviser. hysicist, university president and tritium. Marburger took on the job of behind the scenes from 2001 to 2009 as science adviser to former US president rebuilding public trust in the institution the longest-serving US science adviser. He George W. Bush, John H. Marburger III through openness and transparency. He briefed the president and agencies follow- Poften placed himself at the centre of difficult invited external regulators to sample the ing the September 2001 terrorist attacks situations. He won widespread respect and water and declared that no data would be and anthrax scares, and helped to orient US admiration for his cool temperament, fair- withheld. “We can’t stonewall,” he said. research and development programmes in ness and humanity. A colleague character- Marburger turned around Brookhaven’s the nascent Department of Homeland Secu- ized him as “one of the most effective and reputation, receiving accolades from envi- rity. He also oversaw a massive increase in farsighted scientific administrators of the ronmental groups long critical of the lab. medical-research spending and the response postwar period”. Marburger also faced intense His commitment to public engagement was to the loss of space shuttle Columbia in 2003. criticism. During a public interview in 2005, I Marburger, who died on 28 July 2011 aged pressed Marburger to react to allegations 70, was born on Staten Island, New York, and that there was a systematic effort under way grew up in Severna Park, Maryland. In 1962, at the administration to undermine scientific he completed a bachelor’s degree in physics integrity across the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of the 1 Teraflop Riken-Bnl-Columbia Qcd Project
    BNL 66299 Proceedings of RIKEN BNL Research Center Workshop Volume 13 PHYSICS OF THE 1 TERAFLOP RIKEN-BNL-COLUMBIA QCD PROJECT October 16,1998 ^ 5£f* j£ ] V F APR 0 5 1S99 Organizer Robert Mawhinney FIRST ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION October 16, 1998 Building 510, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA DISTRIBUTION OF THIS "DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED <* » « ^ n I n (fo E^B $ss IF^ Other RIKEN BNL Research Center Proceedings Volumes: Volume 12 - Quarkonium Production in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions - BNL- September 28-October 2, 1998 - Organizer: Dmitri Kharzeev Volume 11 - Event Generator for RHIC Spin Physics - BNL-66116 September 21-23, 1998 - Organizers: Naohito Saito and Andreas Schaefer Volume 10 - Physics of Polarimetry at RHIC - BNL-65926 August 4-7, 1998 - Organizers: Ken Imai and Doug Fields Volume 9 - High Density Matter in AGS, SPS and RHIC Collisions - BNL-65762 July 11, 1998 - Organizers: Klaus Kinder-Geiger and Yang Pang Volume 8 - Fermion Frontiers in Vector Lattice Gauge Theories - BNL-65634 May 6-9, 1998 - Organizers: Robert Mawhinney and Shigemi Ohta Volume 7 - RHIC Spin Physics - BNL-65615 April 27-29, 1998 - Organizers: Gerry Bunce, Yousef Makdisi, Naohito Saito, Mike Tannenbaum and Aki Yokosawa Volume 6 - Quarks and Gluons in the Nucleon - BNL-65234 November 28-29, 1997, Saitama, Japan Organizers: Tashiaki Shibata and Koichi Yazaki Volume 5 - Color Superconductivity, Instantons and Parity (Non?)-Conservation at High Baryon Density - BNL-65105 November 11, 1997 - Organizer - Miklos Gyulassy Volume 4 - Inauguration Ceremony, September 22 and Non-Equilibrium Many Body Dynamics - BNL- 64912 September 23-25, 1997 - Organizer - Miklos Gyulassy Volume 3 - Hadron Spin-Flip at RHIC Energies - BNL-64724 July 21 - August 22, 1997 - Organizers: T.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fn Ee Rw Ms I
    F N E E R W M S I FERMILAB AU.S. DEPARTMENT OF E NERGY L ABORATORY The Power of One 2 Photo by Reidar Hahn Volume 27 INSIDE: March 2004 6 Good Neighbor Policy Number 3 8 The Sensitive Giant f 10 Dance of the Planes 13 Budget Talks by Mike Perricone Plans and hopes for a Linear Collider chart a straight course toward The unification. Globally, the Linear Collider has united scientific communities in the Americas, Europe and Asia in the vision of an underground high-energy facility some 25-30 miles in length, functioning from the outset as a truly cooperative world laboratory. Its mission: exploring the world of the fundamental particles and forces with unprecedented precision by colliding electrons and Power positrons at an unmatched energy of one trillion electron volts (1 TeV). Scientifically, the Linear Collider could bring physicists stealing to the borders of the realm of unification—and the Planck Scale, where relative distances are so small, and energies so high, that only quantum gravity could explain behavior there. At the Planck Scale, physicists hope for their first contact with of One high-energy conditions harking back to the unification of the forces, their first steps on a trail leading back to the common origins of the fundamentally dichotomous quarks and leptons. The Linear Collider will also provide the Countries, particles, first experimental understanding of the nature of dark matter, building a unity forces, fields: of cosmology and particle physics. forces, fields: “This glimpse of Planck-scale physics is very crucial,” said Fermilab theorist Marcela Carena.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Quarterly 03
    NEUROSCIENCE WINTER 2004 QUARTERLY “New advances in genetics and in imaging of the brain Kennedy Receives SfN Award; are likely to lead to Lauds Neuroscience Research Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) accepted the unimaginable new benefits Society’s 2003 Public Service Award in December from SfN President Anne Young. in health care in the coming The awards ceremony was held at the John F. Kennedy Library in Boston. Young noted that years, and I intend to do all I the award was given “in recognition of the Senator’s leadership in Congress supporting bio- can in Congress to see that medical research funding, mental health parity, therapeutic cloning, and other efforts to this research has the full improve the lives of Americans by increasing access to health care.” support it needs.” Kennedy thanked the Society and said, “In this new century of the life sciences, no branch of SfN President Anne Young and Sen. Kennedy –– Senator Edward Kennedy medical research has greater potential than neuroscience. Learning more about the brain and the nervous system is one of the great frontiers of science today, and all of us who care about the issue respect the Society for its leadership in the field.” IN THIS ISSUE Continued on page 19 . Kennedy Receives SfN Public Service Award.................................. 1 Message from the President .......... 1 Message from the President SfN Partners Advocating for Research Funding............................ 5 A “Call to Arms” For Federal Explaining the NIH Roadmap......... 6 Biomedical Research Funding Animals Legal Strategy ................... 7 With the approval of the Bush administration’s 2004 budget, the National Institutes of Q&A: John Marburger, Health (NIH) ended its five-year run of 14 to 15 percent annual funding growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Private Spaceship and Pilot Soar Into Space
    Special Report: Scoping Out The New Space Vision Inside Project Constellation Big Booster Options July/August/September 2004 $4.95 SpaceShip wonderful! THE FIRST PRIVATE SPACESHIP AND PILOT SOAR INTO SPACE PAYLOAD SPACE BIRD Hailed as a modern-day Charles Lindbergh, test pilot Mike Melvill ventures beyond the wild blue yonder for a few minutes of space wonderland. Volume 16, Number 3 July/August/September 2004 6 Special Report MOON, MARS AND BEYOND: SPACE EXPLORATION FOR A NEW ERA THE U.S. BLUEPRINT FOR SPACE EXPLORATION BY JEFF FOUST S4 MODULES FIRST MAN ON THE MOON LOOKS FOWARD TO OTHERS’ RETURN 3 Launch Pad BY NEIL ARMSTRONG S7 4 Mission Control INSIDE PROJECT CONSTELLATION Space Beat BY FRANK SIETZEN, JR. S9 S3 Countdown LAUNCH OPTIONS LOOM LARGE FOR NASA’S NEW MISSION 41 Space Community BY WILLIAM HARWOOD S13 48 Lifting Off ONE WAY TO MARS BY LUCIAN SAMOSATA S18 ON THE COVER: Scaled Composites’ SpaceShipOne THINK SMALL returns from its short but historic venture into space. BY JEFF FOUST S23 Photo: Jeff Foust Outlook: The Real Cost of the New Space Plan BY TAYLOR DINERMAN S26 Outlook: Bush’s Stepping-stones to Space AD ASTRA, which means “to the stars” in Latin, is the motto of the National Space Society, an international BY JOHN H. MARBURGER III S28 membership group dedicated to furthering the explo- ration and development of space. Our quarterly maga- Outlook: Common Goal Unites Space Advocates zine AD ASTRA is only one of many NSS activities aimed at creating a spacefaring civilization. For more informa- BY JIM BANKE S29 tion on NSS call 1-202-429-1600 or visit www.nss.org/ Outlook: The 11th Commandant of Space BY CLIFFORD R.
    [Show full text]
  • BNL Director John Marburger Addresses the 'State of the Lab'
    Vol. 53 - No. 8 March 12, 1999 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY First Anniversary of BSA BNL Director John Marburger Addresses the ‘State of the Lab’ To mark the first anniversary on Marburger announced the beginning March 1 of BSA’s becoming BNL’s of decontamination and decommission- management and operations contrac- ing the Brookhaven Graphite Research tor for DOE, Laboratory Director John Reactor, and the development of a Marburger delivered a “state of the system for minimizing the Lab’s Laboratory” address to a filled Berkner wastestream, “so that today’s waste Hall on Monday, March 8. never becomes a legacy.” In his speech, the Director focused The Lab’s People on three themes: first, BNL’s improved interactions with the local commu- Marburger had opened his talk by nity; second, the continued develop- asking his audience to honor the ment of a “system of assurance” and memory of nine BNL employees and other management systems; and, guests who had died during the past third, the successes of the people who year. The final third of his talk high- do the work of the Laboratory. lighted the Lab’s people and their ac- As a result of his “year of immer- complishments. sion in the Brookhaven experience,” After reviewing management Marburger found, “The state of the changes and arrivals and departures Lab is the state of the Lab’s people and over the past year (see sidebar, page where we are in relation to the com- Roger Stoutenburgh 2), the Director spoke of employees’ munities that we serve.” involvement in the four focus groups that were organized in response to the Caring About the Community recent employee survey.
    [Show full text]