DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Baryonic Dark Matter1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Baryonic Dark Matter1 CERN–TH/2001-061 Non-Baryonic Dark Matter1 Leszek Roszkowski1,2 1Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, England 2TH Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Abstract There exist several well-motivated candidates for non-baryonic cold dark matter, including neutralinos, axions, axinos, gravitinos, Wimpzillas. I review the dark matter properties of the neutralino and the current status of its detection. I also discuss the axino as a new interesting alternative. CERN–TH/2001-061 February 2001 1Invited plenary review talk given at 6th International Workshop on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 99), 6-10 September, 1999, Paris, France. 2 Non-Baryonic Dark Matter † Leszek Roszkowski Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, England There exist several well-motivated candidates for non-baryonic cold dark matter, including neutralinos, axions, axinos, gravitinos, Wimpzillas. I review the dark matter properties of the neutralino and the current status of its detection. I also discuss the axino as a new interesting alternative. 1. Introduction will also comment about recent results regarding axinos. The puzzle of the hypothetical dark matter Neutrinos, the only WIMPs that are actually (DM) in the Universe still remains unresolved [1]. known to exist, do not seem particularly attrac- While there may well be more than one type of tive as DM candidates. It has long been believed DM, arguments from large structures suggest that that their mass is probably very tiny, as suggested a large, and presumably dominant, fraction of by favored solutions to the solar and atmospheric DM in the Universe is made of massive particles neutrino problems, which would make them hot, which at the time of entering the epoch of mat- rather than cold DM. This picture has recently ter dominance would be already non-relativistic, been given strong support by first direct evidence or cold. From the particle physics point of view, from Superkamiokande for neutrinos’ mass [4]. cold DM (CDM) could most plausibly be made While the new data only gives the µ τ neu- of so-called weakly interacting massive particles −3 2 trino mass-square difference of 2.2 10− eV ,it (WIMPs). it very unlikely that there would exist× two mas- There exist several interesting WIMP candi- sive neutrinos with cosmologically relevant mass dates for CDM that are well-motivated by the of 5 to 40 eV and such a tiny mass difference. underlying particle physics. The neutralino is The strength with which the WIMP candidates considered by many a “front-runner” by be- listed above interact with ordinary matter spans ing perhaps the most natural WIMP: it comes many orders of magnitude. For the neutrali- as an unavoidable prediction of supersymmetry 2 5 nos it is a fraction ( 10− 10− )ofthe (SUSY). The axion is another well-motivated can- weak strength. Interactions∼ −∼ of axions and axi- didate [2]. But by no means should one forget 2 16 nos are suppressed by (mW /fa) 10− ,where about some other contenders. While some old 10 ∼ fa 10 GeV is the scale at which the global picks (sneutrinos and neutrinos with mass in the Peccei-Quinn∼ U(1) symmetry is broken. Interac- GeV range) have now been ruled out as cosmolog- tions of gravitinos and other relics with only grav- ically relevant CDM by LEP, axinos (SUSY part- itational interactions are typically suppressed by ners of axions) have recently been revamped [3]. 2 33 (mW /MPlanck) 10− . One may wonder how Another well-known candidate is the fermionic such vastly different∼ strengths can all give the partner of the graviton, the gravitino. Most of relic abundance of the expected order of the crit- the review will be devoted to the neutralino but I ical density. The answer lies in the different ways they could be produced in the early Universe: the yInvited plenary review talk given at 6th International neutralinos are mainly produced “thermally”: at Workshop on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground some temperature they decouple from the ther- Physics (TAUP 99), 6-10 September, 1999, Paris, France. 3 mal bath. But in addition there exist also several due to assumed R-parity. A perfect candidate for mechanisms of “non-thermal” production. This aWIMP! is how CDM axinos, gravitinos can be produced The neutralino is a well-motivated candidate. (in addition to “thermal” production), as well as It is an inherent element of any phenomenologi- Wimpzillas [5]. cally relevant SUSY model. Being neutral, it is It is obvious that WIMPs do not necessarily a natural candidate for the LSP (although one have to interact only via weak interactions per should remember that this is often only an as- se. WIMPs are generally required to be electri- sumption); it couples to ordinary matter with a cally neutral because of stringent observational weak-interaction strength (reduced by mixing an- constraints on the abundance of stable charged gles) which is within the range of sensitivity of relics. On the other hand, they could in princi- present-day high energy, as well as dark matter, ple carry color charges. (For example, a stable detectors. Finally, as a bonus, it naturally gives 2 gluino above 130 150 GeV [6], or in an experi- Ωχh 1 for broad ranges of masses of SUSY mentally allowed− window 25 35 GeV [7], could particles∼ below a few TeV and for natural ranges still be the lightest SUSY particle− (LSP) although of other SUSY parameters. its relic abundance would be very small [6].) In a Much literature has been devoted to the neu- halo they would exist as neutral states by form- tralino as DM, including a number of comprehen- ing composites with gluon or quarks. We can see sive and topical reviews (see, e.g., Refs. [9,10]). that generally WIMPs are expected to have sup- Here I will only summarize the main results and pressed effective couplings with ordinary matter. comment on some recent developments and up- Otherwise, they would dissipate their kinetic en- dates. ergy. Neutralino properties as DM and ensuing im- 2 What is the WIMP relic abundance Ωχh = plications for SUSY spectra are quite model de- ρχ/ρcrit [8]? Current estimates of the lower pendent but certain general conclusions can be bound on the age of the Universe lead to drawn. First, its cosmological properties are very 2 ΩTOTALh < 0.25. Recent results from rich clus- different depending on a neutralino type. The ters of galaxies and high-redshift supernovae type relic abundance of gaugino-like (mostly bino-like) Ia imply Ωmatter 0.3. The Hubble parameter is neutralinos is primarily determined by the (light- now constrained' to 0.65 0.1. Big Bang nucle- est) sfermion exchange in the LSP annihilation ± 2 ¯ 2 4 2 osynthesis requires Ωbaryonh < 0.015. Assuming into ff:Ωh m /m . In order to have Ωχ 1, ∝ f χ ∼ that most matter in the Universe∼ is made of CDM the lightest sfermion cannot be too light (below WIMPs, one therefore obtains 100 GeV) nor tooe heavy (heavier than a few ∼ 2 hundred GeV) [11] which is a perfectly natural 0.1 < Ωχh < 0.15 (1) ∼ ∼ range of values. or so. At the very least, requiring that a dominant On the other hand, higgsino-like χ’s are fraction of CDM is located only in galactic halos strongly disfavored. Firstly, due to GUT relations 2 gives Ωχh > 0.025. among gaugino masses, higgsinos correspond to ∼ rather large gluino mass values, above 1 TeV, 2. Neutralinos which may be considered as unnatural [11]. Fur- thermore, higgsino-like neutralinos have been The DM candidate that has attracted perhaps shown to provide very little relic abundance. For the most wide-spread attention from both the mχ >mZ ,mW ,mt the χ pair-annihilation into theoretical and experimental communities is the those respective final states (ZZ, WW, tt¯)is neutralino. It is a neutral Majorana particle, the very strong. But both below and above those lightest of the mass eigenstates of the fermionic thresholds, there are additional co-annihilation partners of the gauge and Higgs bosons: the bino, 0 [12] processes of the LSP with χ1± and χ2, which wino and the two neutral higgsinos. If it is the are in this case almost mass-degenerate with the lightest SUSY particle, it is massive and stable, 4 2 LSP. Co-annihilation typically reduces Ωχh be- the theoretical criterion of naturalness: expecting low any interesting level although it has been re- that no SUSY masses should significantly exceed cently argued that the effect of co-annihilation is that value. Again, GUT relations among gaugino not always as strong as previously claimed [13]. masses cause the above constraint to provide a Higgsino-like LSPs are thus rather unattractive, much more stringent (although still only indica- although still possible DM candidates, especially tive) bound of about 150 200 GeV. Remarkably, − in the large mass (mχ > 500 GeV) regime. One in the scenario with additional GUT unification also arrives at the same∼ conclusions in the case of spin-zero mass parameters, just such a typi- of ‘mixed’ neutralinos composed of comparable cal upper bound derives from the cosmological 2 fractions of gauginos and higgsinos. This is be- constraint Ωχh < 1. Only in a relatively nar- cause, even without co-annihilation, in this case row range of parameters where the neutralino be- the neutralino pair-annihilation is less suppressed comes nearly mass degenerate with a SUSY part- and one invariably finds very small Ωχ there [11]. ner of the tau, τR, the effect of the neutralino’s Remarkably, just such a cosmologically pre- co-annihilation opens up the allowed range of mχ ferred gaugino type of neutralino typically up to about 600e GeV [17].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Axions and Other Similar Particles
    1 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles Revised October 2019 by A. Ringwald (DESY, Hamburg), L.J. Rosenberg (U. Washington) and G. Rybka (U. Washington). 91.1 Introduction In this section, we list coupling-strength and mass limits for light neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons that couple weakly to normal matter and radiation. Such bosons may arise from the spon- taneous breaking of a global U(1) symmetry, resulting in a massless Nambu-Goldstone (NG) boson. If there is a small explicit symmetry breaking, either already in the Lagrangian or due to quantum effects such as anomalies, the boson acquires a mass and is called a pseudo-NG boson. Typical examples are axions (A0)[1–4] and majorons [5], associated, respectively, with a spontaneously broken Peccei-Quinn and lepton-number symmetry. A common feature of these light bosons φ is that their coupling to Standard-Model particles is suppressed by the energy scale that characterizes the symmetry breaking, i.e., the decay constant f. The interaction Lagrangian is −1 µ L = f J ∂µ φ , (91.1) where J µ is the Noether current of the spontaneously broken global symmetry. If f is very large, these new particles interact very weakly. Detecting them would provide a window to physics far beyond what can be probed at accelerators. Axions are of particular interest because the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism remains perhaps the most credible scheme to preserve CP-symmetry in QCD. Moreover, the cold dark matter (CDM) of the universe may well consist of axions and they are searched for in dedicated experiments with a realistic chance of discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrien Christian René THOB
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF GALAXIES AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON DARK MATTER HALO STRUCTURE IN SIMULATED GALAXIES Adrien Christian René THOB A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 26 April 2019 To my grand-parents, René Roumeaux, Christian Thob, Yvette Roumeaux (née Bajaud) and Anne-Marie Thob (née Léglise). ii Abstract Galaxies are among nature’s most majestic and diverse structures. They can play host to as few as several thousands of stars, or as many as hundreds of billions. They exhibit a broad range of shapes, sizes, colours, and they can inhabit vastly differing cosmic environments. The physics of galaxy formation is highly non-linear and in- volves a variety of physical mechanisms, precluding the development of entirely an- alytic descriptions, thus requiring that theoretical ideas concerning the origin of this diversity are tested via the confrontation of numerical models (or “simulations”) with observational measurements. The EAGLE project (which stands for Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) is a state-of-the-art suite of such cos- mological hydrodynamical simulations of the Universe. EAGLE is unique in that the ill-understood efficiencies of feedback mechanisms implemented in the model were calibrated to ensure that the observed stellar masses and sizes of present-day galaxies were reproduced. We investigate the connection between the morphology and internal 9:5 kinematics of the stellar component of central galaxies with mass M? > 10 M in the EAGLE simulations. We compare several kinematic diagnostics commonly used to describe simulated galaxies, and find good consistency between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Dark Matter an Introduction Into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches
    Particle Dark Matter An Introduction into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches Lecture for ESIPAP 2016 European School of Instrumentation in Particle & Astroparticle Physics Archamps Technopole XENON1T January 25th, 2016 Uwe Oberlack Institute of Physics & PRISMA Cluster of Excellence Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz http://xenon.physik.uni-mainz.de Outline ● Evidence for Dark Matter: ▸ The Problem of Missing Mass ▸ In galaxies ▸ In galaxy clusters ▸ In the universe as a whole ● DM Candidates: ▸ The DM particle zoo ▸ WIMPs ● DM Direct Searches: ▸ Detection principle, physics inputs ▸ Example experiments & results ▸ Outlook Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 2 Types of Evidences for Dark Matter ● Kinematic studies use luminous astrophysical objects to probe the gravitational potential of a massive environment, e.g.: ▸ Stars or gas clouds probing the gravitational potential of galaxies ▸ Galaxies or intergalactic gas probing the gravitational potential of galaxy clusters ● Gravitational lensing is an independent way to measure the total mass (profle) of a foreground object using the light of background sources (galaxies, active galactic nuclei). ● Comparison of mass profles with observed luminosity profles lead to a problem of missing mass, usually interpreted as evidence for Dark Matter. ● Measuring the geometry (curvature) of the universe, indicates a ”fat” universe with close to critical density. Comparison with luminous mass: → a major accounting problem! Including observations of the expansion history lead to the Standard Model of Cosmology: accounting defcit solved by ~68% Dark Energy, ~27% Dark Matter and <5% “regular” (baryonic) matter. ● Other lines of evidence probe properties of matter under the infuence of gravity: ▸ the equation of state of oscillating matter as observed through fuctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (acoustic peaks).
    [Show full text]
  • DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]
    Physics Education 1 dateline DARK MATTER AND NEUTRINOS Gazal Sharma1, Anu2 and B. C. Chauhan3 Department of Physics & Astronomical Science School of Physical & Material Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP) Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) INDIA-176215. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (Submitted 03-08-2015) Abstract The Keplerian distribution of velocities is not observed in the rotation of large scale structures, such as found in the rotation of spiral galaxies. The deviation from Keplerian distribution provides compelling evidence of the presence of non-luminous matter i.e. called dark matter. There are several astrophysical motivations for investigating the dark matter in and around the galaxy as halo. In this work we address various theoretical and experimental indications pointing towards the existence of this unknown form of matter. Amongst its constituents neutrino is one of the most prospective candidates. We know the neutrinos oscillate and have tiny masses, but there are also signatures for existence of heavy and light sterile neutrinos and possibility of their mixing. Altogether, the role of neutrinos is of great interests in cosmology and understanding dark matter. arXiv:1711.10564v1 [physics.pop-ph] 23 Nov 2017 1 Introduction revealed in 2013 that our Universe contains 68:3% of dark energy, 26:8% of dark matter, and only 4:9% of the Universe is known mat- As a human being the biggest surprise for us ter which includes all the stars, planetary sys- was, that the Universe in which we live in tems, galaxies, and interstellar gas etc.. This is mostly dark.
    [Show full text]
  • A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2013.46.2.93 46: 93 ∼ 96, 2013 April ISSN:1225-4614 c 2013 The Korean Astronomical Society. All Rights Reserved. http://jkas.kas.org A DERIVATION OF MODIFIED NEWTONIAN DYNAMICS Sascha Trippe Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea E-mail : [email protected] (Received February 14, 2013; Revised March 20, 2013; Accepted March 29, 2013) ABSTRACT Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a possible solution for the missing mass problem in galac- tic dynamics; its predictions are in good agreement with observations in the limit of weak accelerations. However, MOND does not derive from a physical mechanism and does not make predictions on the transitional regime from Newtonian to modified dynamics; rather, empirical transition functions have to be constructed from the boundary conditions and comparisons with observations. I compare the formalism of classical MOND to the scaling law derived from a toy model of gravity based on virtual massive gravitons (the “graviton picture”) which I proposed recently. I conclude that MOND naturally derives from the “graviton picture” at least for the case of non-relativistic, highly symmetric dynamical systems. This suggests that – to first order – the “graviton picture” indeed provides a valid candidate for the physical mechanism behind MOND and gravity on galactic scales in general. Key words : Gravitation — Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics −10 −2 1. INTRODUCTION where x = ac/am, am ≈ 10 ms is Milgrom’s con- stant, and µ(x)isa transition function with the asymp- “ It is worth remembering that all of the discus- totic behavior µ(x) → 1 for x ≫ 1 and µ(x) → x for sion [on dark matter] so far has been based on x ≪ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Non–Baryonic Dark Matter V
    Non–Baryonic Dark Matter V. Berezinsky1 , A. Bottino2,3 and G. Mignola3,4 1INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy 2Universit`a di Torino, via P. Giuria 1, I-10125 Torino, Italy 3INFN - Sezione di Torino, via P. Giuria 1, I-10125 Torino, Italy 4Theoretical Physics Division, CERN, CH–1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland (presented by V. Berezinsky) The best particle candidates for non–baryonic cold dark matter are reviewed, namely, neutralino, axion, axino and Majoron. These particles are considered in the context of cosmological models with the restrictions given by the observed mass spectrum of large scale structures, data on clusters of galaxies, age of the Universe etc. 1. Introduction (Cosmological environ- The structure formation in Universe put strong ment) restrictions to the properties of DM in Universe. Universe with HDM plus baryonic DM has a Presence of dark matter (DM) in the Universe wrong prediction for the spectrum of fluctuations is reliably established. Rotation curves in many as compared with measurements of COBE, IRAS galaxies provide evidence for large halos filled by and CfA. CDM plus baryonic matter can ex- nonluminous matter. The galaxy velocity distri- plain the spectrum of fluctuations if total density bution in clusters also show the presence of DM in Ω0 ≈ 0.3. intercluster space. IRAS and POTENT demon- There is one more form of energy density in the strate the presence of DM on the largest scale in Universe, namely the vacuum energy described the Universe. by the cosmological constant Λ. The correspond- The matter density in the Universe ρ is usually 2 ing energy density is given by ΩΛ =Λ/(3H0 ).
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Radiation from the Axino Solution of the Gravitino Problem
    21st of July 2011 Dark radiation from the axino solution of the gravitino problem Jasper Hasenkamp II. Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany [email protected] Abstract Current observations of the cosmic microwave background could confirm an in- crease in the radiation energy density after primordial nucleosynthesis but before photon decoupling. We show that, if the gravitino problem is solved by a light axino, dark (decoupled) radiation emerges naturally in this period leading to a new upper 11 bound on the reheating temperature TR . 10 GeV. In turn, successful thermal leptogenesis might predict such an increase. The Large Hadron Collider could en- dorse this opportunity. At the same time, axion and axino can naturally form the observed dark matter. arXiv:1107.4319v2 [hep-ph] 13 Dec 2011 1 Introduction It is a new opportunity to determine the amount of radiation in the Universe from obser- vations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) alone with precision comparable to that from big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN). Recent measurements by the Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) [1], the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) [2] and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [3] indicate|statistically not significant|the radi- ation energy density at the time of photon decoupling to be higher than inferred from primordial nucleosynthesis in standard cosmology making use of the Standard Model of particle physics, cf. [4,5]. This could be taken as another hint for physics beyond the two standard models. The Planck satellite, which is already taking data, could turn the hint into a discovery. We should search for explanations from particle physics for such an increase in ra- diation [6,7], especially, because other explanations are missing, if the current mean values are accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Collider Signatures of Axino and Gravitino Dark Matter
    2005 International Linear Collider Workshop - Stanford, U.S.A. Collider Signatures of Axino and Gravitino Dark Matter Frank Daniel Steffen DESY Theory Group, Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany The axino and the gravitino are extremely weakly interacting candidates for the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP). We demonstrate that either of them could provide the right amount of cold dark matter. Assuming that a charged slepton is the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP), we discuss how NLSP decays into the axino/gravitino LSP can provide evidence for axino/gravitino dark matter at future colliders. We show that these NLSP decays will allow us to estimate the value of the Peccei–Quinn scale and the axino mass if the axino is the LSP. In the case of the gravitino LSP, we illustrate that the gravitino mass can be determined. This is crucial for insights into the mechanism of supersymmetry breaking and can lead to a microscopic measurement of the Planck scale. 1. INTRODUCTION A key problem in cosmology is the understanding of the nature of cold dark matter. In supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model, the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is stable if R-parity is conserved [1]. An electrically and color neutral LSP thus appears as a compelling solution to the dark matter problem. The lightest neutralino is such an LSP candidate from the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). Here we consider two well- motivated alternative LSP candidates beyond the MSSM: the axino and the gravitino. In the following we introduce the axino and the gravitino. We review that axinos/gravitinos from thermal pro- duction in the early Universe can provide the right amount of cold dark matter depending on the value of the reheating temperature after inflation and the axino/gravitino mass.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contents of the Universe
    Ay 127! The Contents of the Universe 0.5 % Stars and other visible stuff Supernovae alone ⇒ Accelerating expansion ⇒ Λ > 0 CMB alone ⇒ Flat universe ⇒ Λ > 0 Any two of SN, CMB, LSS ⇒ Dark energy ~70% Also in agreement with the age estimates (globular clusters, nucleocosmochronology, white dwarfs) Today’s Best Guess Universe Age: Best fit CMB model - consistent with ages of oldest stars t0 =13.82 ± 0.05 Gyr Hubble constant: CMB + HST Key Project to -1 -1 measure Cepheid distances H0 = 69 km s Mpc € Density of ordinary matter: CMB + comparison of nucleosynthesis with Lyman-a Ωbaryon = 0.04 € forest deuterium measurement Density of all forms of matter: Cluster dark matter estimate CMB power spectrum 0.31 € Ωmatter = Cosmological constant: Supernova data, CMB evidence Ω = 0.69 for a flat universe plus a low € Λ matter density € The Component Densities at z ~ 0, in critical density units, assuming h ≈ 0.7 Total matter/energy density: Ω0,tot ≈ 1.00 From CMB, and consistent with SNe, LSS From local dynamics and LSS, and Matter density: Ω0,m ≈ 0.31 consistent with SNe, CMB From cosmic nucleosynthesis, Baryon density: Ω0,b ≈ 0.045 and independently from CMB Luminous baryon density: Ω0,lum ≈ 0.005 From the census of luminous matter (stars, gas) Since: Ω0,tot > Ω0,m > Ω0,b > Ω0,lum There is baryonic dark matter There is non-baryonic dark matter There is dark energy The Luminosity Density Integrate galaxy luminosity function (obtained from large redshift surveys) to obtain the mean luminosity density at z ~ 0 8 3 SDSS, r band: ρL = (1.8 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc 8 3 2dFGRS, b band: ρL = (1.4 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc Luminosity To Mass Typical (M/L) ratios in the B band along the Hubble sequence, within the luminous portions of galaxies, are ~ 4 - 5 M/L This includes some dark matter - for pure stellar populations, (M/L) ratios should be slightly lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review
    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review Riccardo Scarpa European Southern Observatory, Chile E-mail [email protected] Abstract. By the time, in 1937, the Swiss astronomer Zwicky measured the velocity dispersion of the Coma cluster of galaxies, astronomers somehow got acquainted with the idea that the universe is filled by some kind of dark matter. After almost a century of investigations, we have learned two things about dark matter, (i) it has to be non-baryonic -- that is, made of something new that interact with normal matter only by gravitation-- and, (ii) that its effects are observed in -8 -2 stellar systems when and only when their internal acceleration of gravity falls below a fix value a0=1.2×10 cm s . Being completely decoupled dark and normal matter can mix in any ratio to form the objects we see in the universe, and indeed observations show the relative content of dark matter to vary dramatically from object to object. This is in open contrast with point (ii). In fact, there is no reason why normal and dark matter should conspire to mix in just the right way for the mass discrepancy to appear always below a fixed acceleration. This systematic, more than anything else, tells us we might be facing a failure of the law of gravity in the weak field limit rather then the effects of dark matter. Thus, in an attempt to avoid the need for dark matter many modifications of the law of gravity have been proposed in the past decades. The most successful – and the only one that survived observational tests -- is the Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Axinos from Freeze-In: Production Processes, Phase Space Distributions, and Ly-Α Forest Constraints
    CTPU-17-25 UT-17-25 Light Axinos from Freeze-in: production processes, phase space distributions, and Ly-α forest constraints Kyu Jung Bae,1 Ayuki Kamada,1 Seng Pei Liew,2 and Keisuke Yanagi3 1Center for Theoretical Physics of the Universe, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34051, Korea 2Physik-Department, Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen, 85748 Garching, Germany 3Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (Dated: June 2, 2020) We consider freeze-in production of 7 keV axino dark matter (DM) in the supersymmetric Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky (DFSZ) model in light of the 3:5 keV line excess. The warmness of such 7 keV DM produced from the thermal bath, in general, appears in ten- sion with Ly-α forest data, although a direct comparison is not straightforward. This is because the Ly-α forest constraints are usually reported on the mass of the conventional warm dark matter (WDM), where large entropy production is implicitly assumed to occur in the thermal bath after WDM particles decouple. The phase space distribution of freeze-in axino DM varies depending on production processes and axino DM may alleviate the tension with the tight Ly-α forest constraints. By solving the Boltzmann equation, we first obtain the resultant phase space distribution of axinos produced by 2-body decay, 3-body decay, and 2-to-2 scattering, respectively. The reduced collision term and resultant phase space distribution are useful for studying other freeze-in scenarios as well. We then calculate the resultant linear matter power spectra for such axino DM and directly compare them with the linear matter power spectra for the conventional WDM.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Review of Axion and Axino Parameters
    A short review of axion and axino parameters Jihn E. Kim Seoul National University Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Seattle, 25 April 2012 What can be there beyond SM? New CP? Axions? SUSY? String? 1. Strong CP and axions 2. Axino mass 3. Pseudoscalar boson at 125 GeV ? J E Kim Axion and axino parameters, Seattle, 25 Apr. 2012 2/56 Dark matter observed in the Universe Axion natural sol. of strong CP Supersymmetry natural sol. of the Higgs mass problem All three are related to this talk. J E Kim Axion and axino parameters, Seattle, 25 Apr. 2012 3/56 1. Strong CP and axions Axion is a Goldstone boson arising when the PQ global symmetry is spontaneously broken. PQ symmetry: Wigner-Weyl realization Axion: Nambu-Goldstone realization The axion models have the spontaneous symmetry breaking scale V and the axion decay constant fa which are related by V =NDW fa. Here, I present the general idea on axions and its SUSY partner axino. J E Kim Axion and axino parameters, Seattle, 25 Apr. 2012 4/56 A rough sketch of masses and cross sections. Bosonic DM with collective motion is always CDM. [Kim-Carosi , 2008] J E Kim Axion and axino parameters, Seattle, 25 Apr. 2012 5/56 The cosmic axion density is, 9 12 10 GeV < Fa < {10 GeV ?} Turner (86), Grin et al (07), Giudice-Kolb-Riotto (08), Bae-Huh-K (JCAP 08, [arXiv:0806.0497]): recalculated including the anharmonic term carefully with the new data on light quark masses. It is the basis of using the anthropic argument for a large fa.
    [Show full text]