DOCSLIB.ORG

Facts on File News Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Facts on File News Services Facts On File News Services http://www.2facts.com/PrintPage.aspx?PIN=1971108670 Issue Date: December 01, 1971 Indian-Pakistani Conflict: India Intensifies Operations; Other Developments Pakistan Calls Up Reserves The major fighting that had erupted in East Pakistan November 21 intensified as India acknowledged that its troops had crossed the border in self-defense on at least three occasions. The threat of heavier battles loomed as India announced November 28 that its forces would follow a policy of hot pursuit. [See 1971 Indian Troops Reported Fighting in East Pakistan at Side of Bengali Rebels...Full Scale Invasion Doubted] The heaviest battle between Indian and Pakistani troops broke out in the northwestern section of the province at the strategic town of Hilli November 27 and continued through November 30. In fighting to the south, Indian and Bengali rebels were said to have seized small pieces of territories near Jessore, Comilla, Sylhet and west of Chittagong. Pakistan claimed November 30 that 2,000 Indians had been killed and 4,000 wounded in a week of fighting. Pakistan placed its casualties in the same period at 30 killed and 100 wounded. In the battle for Hilli, New Delhi officials said November 28 that Indian forces had pushed into East Pakistan the previous day after Pakistani artillery had fired on the nearby Indian border town of Balurghat. At least 20 civilians were killed in four days of shelling. The Indian incursion force was believed to total 2,900 men and 45 tanks. Five Pakistani tanks were reported by the Indians to have been destroyed. Hilli was astride a railway whose capture would cut off the Pakistani supply route from Jessore to the south. A military spokesman in Rawalpindi November 30 acknowledged that Pakistani forces had abandoned to attacking Indian soldiers the border village of Pachhagarh near the extreme northwest corner of the province. India's new policy of pursuit was announced by Defense Minister Jagjivan Ram November 28. He said the Indian troops had been given permission to move as deep into Pakistan as the range of Pakistani guns shelling them--15-20 miles. A Defense Ministry spokesman explained November 29 that Indian troops would cross the border "whenever the life or property of our citizens are in danger or the integrity of our borders is threatened." He said the troops would remain in East Pakistan until the threat had been removed. India's first acknowledgment that its forces had entered East Pakistan was made by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in Parliament November 24. She said Indian troops had carried out the thrust November 21 to repulse a Pakistani attack in the vicinity of Boyra, an Indian border village. Mrs. Gandhi denied Pakistani charges that Indians were "engaged in an undeclared war and have mounted massive attacks with tanks and troops." The second Indian "defensive action" inside East Pakistan was reported by New Delhi officials November 26. They said the thrust followed heavy Pakistani attacks on the Indian village of Balurghat November 24. The Indians said 80 Pakistani soldiers had been killed in fighting in the area November 25. An Indian military spokesman reported November 26 that many Pakistani army units had been withdrawn from the interior of East Pakistan to confront the Indian forces on the border. As a result, he said, the Bengali rebels had steadily widened their control of the interior of the province. Pakistan Calls Up Reserves The seriousness of the fighting was indicated by a Pakistan announcement November 25 that it was calling up the military reserves. In another action, the government advised West Pakistanis to dig trenches to cope with a possible Indian attack in that region. Also in West Pakistan, naval authorities warned shipping to remain at least 75 miles from the port of Karachi during the hours of darkness. Pakistan had charged that Indian ships had attacked freighters supplying East Pakistan, sinking one grain ship. This was Pakistan's version of the fighting with India: An Indian attack inside East Pakistan November 23 was repulsed and government forces recaptured a border outpost at Chanderpur, captured by the Indians in Sylhet District, a military spokesman reported November 25. Two fresh Indian attacks in the northern part of the province were repulsed with a loss of 100 Indian lives, Pakistani radio reported November 25. Pakistani casualties were listed as seven killed. The radio reported earlier that 200 Indians had been slain in a clash at Sylhet. An Indian drive into East Pakistan November 25 was aimed at isolating Pakistani forces near the Indian border town of Belonia, the Pakistani military command reported November 26. The command said the attack was part of "continuing pressure" by Indian soldiers at nine scattered points along the frontier. The command acknowledged New Delhi claims that Indian forces held territory near Jessore, Sylhet, Comilla and Chittagong. The command said the Indians had lost 200-300 men killed in the fighting in the Jessore area. 1 of 2 3/31/2011 14:45 Facts On File News Services http://www.2facts.com/PrintPage.aspx?PIN=1971108670 General A. A. K. Niazi, military commander of East Pakistan, said November 26 that he considered that war had begun between India and Pakistan. © 2011 Facts On File News Services Modern Language Association (MLA) Citation: "Indian-Pakistani Conflict: India Intensifies Operations; Other Developments." Facts On File World News Digest: n. pag. World News Digest. Facts On File News Services, 1 Dec. 1971. Web. 31 Mar. 2011. <http://www.2facts.com/article/1971108670>. For further information see Citing Sources in MLA Style. Facts On File News Services' automatically generated MLA citations have been updated according to the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 7th edition. American Psychological Association (APA) Citation format: The title of the article. (Year, Month Day). Facts On File World News Digest. Retrieved Month Day, Year, from World News Digest database. See the American Psychological Association (APA) Style Citations for more information on citing in APA style. 2 of 2 3/31/2011 14:45.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe
    Vita Mathematica 18 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Vita Mathematica Volume 18 Edited by Martin MattmullerR More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/4834 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Author Hugo Steinhaus (1887–1972) Translator Abe Shenitzer Brookline, MA, USA Editors Robert G. Burns York University Dept. Mathematics & Statistics Toronto, ON, Canada Irena Szymaniec Wrocław, Poland Aleksander Weron The Hugo Steinhaus Center Wrocław University of Technology Wrocław, Poland Vita Mathematica ISBN 978-3-319-21983-7 ISBN 978-3-319-21984-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21984-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015954183 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency at the Frontier and the Building of Territoriality in the Naranjo-Ceibo Corridor, Peten, Guatemala
    AGENCY AT THE FRONTIER AND THE BUILDING OF TERRITORIALITY IN THE NARANJO-CEIBO CORRIDOR, PETEN, GUATEMALA By LUIS ALFREDO ARRIOLA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Luis Alfredo Arriola To my beloved family, in appreciation of all they have endured. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The sheer magnitude of a dissertation necessarily engages multiple collaborations. In consequence I render proper credit to the people and institutions who partook of this endeavor. My everlasting gratitude goes, first and foremost, to the people of Naranjo and Ceibo who taught more than I could ever learn from them. Intellectual support was always there when needed from committee members, namely Professors Allan Burns, Marianne Schmink, Michael Heckenberger, and Murdo MacLeod. They challenged my intellect in many positive, creative ways. My dissertation mutual support group is recognized for invaluable contributions to my refining of the manuscript’s content and form at several stages of its development. The insightful feedback from Alex Rodlach, Maxine Downs, Deborah Rodman, Paige Lado, and Fatma Soud helped me through difficult times. My editors, Martha Jeanne Weismantel, Tara Boonstra and Mark Minho, have but my highest regards. Other people who accompanied me in this intellectual journey and who deserve mentioning include Norman Schwartz, Victor Hugo Ramos, Edgar Calderón, Roberto Barrios, Kevin Gould, Georg Grumberg, Julio Cano and Werner Ramírez. Diverse kinds of support came from Tom Ankersen, Hugo Guillen, Bruce Ferguson, Richard Phillips, Paul Losch, Marie-Claire Paiz, Abimael Reinoso, Jorge Soza, Amilcar Corzo, Mario Mancilla and Luis A.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Border Management an Indian Perspective September 2016
    Content Smart border management p4 / Responding to border management challenges p7 / Challenges p18 / Way forward: Smart border management p22 / Case studies p30 Smart border management An Indian perspective September 2016 www.pwc.in Foreword India’s geostrategic location, its relatively sound economic position vis-à-vis its neighbours and its liberal democratic credentials have induced the government to undertake proper management of Indian borders, which is vital to national security. In Central and South Asia, smart border management has a critical role to play. When combined with liberal trade regimes and business-friendly environments, HIğFLHQWFXVWRPVDQGERUGHUFRQWUROVFDQVLJQLğFDQWO\LPSURYHSURVSHFWVIRUWUDGH and economic growth. India shares 15,106.7 km of its boundary with seven nations—Pakistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. These land borders run through different terrains; managing a diverse land border is a complex task but YHU\VLJQLğFDQWIURPWKHYLHZRIQDWLRQDOVHFXULW\,QDGGLWLRQ,QGLDKDVDFRDVWDO boundary of 7,516.6 km, which includes 5,422.6 km of coastline in the mainland and 2,094 km of coastline bordering islands. The coastline touches 9 states and 2 union territories. The traditional approach to border management, i.e. focussing only on border security, has become inadequate. India needs to not only ensure seamlessness in the legitimate movement of people and goods across its borders but also undertake UHIRUPVWRFXUELOOHJDOĠRZ,QFUHDVHGELODWHUDODQGPXOWLODWHUDOFRRSHUDWLRQFRXSOHG with the adoption of
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles the Ground Plan As a Tool
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Ground Plan as a Tool for The Identification and Study of Houses in an Old Kingdom Special-Purpose Settlement at Heit el-Ghurab, Giza A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Mohsen E Kamel 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Ground Plan as a Tool for The Identification and Study of Houses in an Old Kingdom Special-Purpose Settlement at Heit el-Ghurab, Giza by Mohsen E Kamel Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Willemina Z. Wendrich, Chair The ground plan is an essential goal of the settlement archaeologist. For the archaeologist who would attempt to glean evidence of settlements of the Old Kingdom (c. 2543 - 2120 BCE), the ground plan is most often the ultimate goal, for although the seemingly eternal stone funerary monuments of Giza dominate the Old Kingdom landscape (both literally and figuratively), the Pyramid Age has not left standing the mudbrick walls of the houses within which people lived-- the preponderance of Old-Kingdom wall remnants comprising mere centimeters. Without an accurate ground plan, material culture and faunal and botanical evidence have no context. This study presents a detailed, concrete analysis and comparison of the ground plans of two structures that can be interpreted as houses from the Old Kingdom, 4th-dynasty (2543 – 2436 BCE) settlement site of Heit el-Ghurab at Giza. The houses whose ground plans are presented here are representative of a corpus of unpublished probable dwellings from this site, which excavation ii suggests was a “special-purpose” settlement that housed and provisioned the personnel engaged in the monumental constructions on the Giza plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • School Building in Long Branch
    Weather **f MLY nUd tomorrew, Ugh Red Bank Area f to upper «% Outlook Friday, "V Copyiiiit-tto Red Bank Register, lac, MS, fair tad coatlaued mm. MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 87 YEARS DIAL 741-0010 . 178 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 1966 7c PER COPY PAGE ONE 650 Junior High Students Evacuated in Fire School Building in Long Branch LONG BRANCH — Fire officials were scheduled to begin • burn throughout the rest of the afternoon, but was confined fire hoses to prevent blowing sparks from igniting them. Elec- hurst, Wanamaasa, Deal and Alfenhurst fought tfie blaze. The their probe this morning into the cause of the fire which yester- within the gutted 67-year-old structure. tricity was cut off shortly after the blaze began, and the Wanamassa company used its newly acquired snorkel fire day destroyed the Chattle School Building and forced the evac- Firemen were recalled to the scene last night at 6:4$ and Willow Ave. houses were without electric power for most of truck, which carried the aerial rig from the Allenhurst.com* uation of some 65Q junior high school students. - 9:45 to extinguish flames which broke out. the afternoon. 1 • '•"••" •>'.•••••'•*• party. The-city used its two aerial trucks. The investigation was delayed because four feet of water BUILDINGS EVACUATED Chief Richter said the*fire quickly spread through the air tilled the basement area where the fire was believed to have ' School children and teachers were evacuated from the duct system of the buildings the' flames being carried' almost T^ie fire, was discovered by School Principal James J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceasefire Violations in Jammu and Kashmir a Line on Fire
    [PEACEW RKS [ CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR A LINE ON FIRE Happymon Jacob ABOUT THE REPORT Ceasefire violations along the Line of Control and international border between India and Pakistan have over the last decade been the primary trigger of tensions and conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad in the long-disputed Kashmir region. This report, supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and based on extensive field visits to the border areas, in-depth interviews with Indian and Pakistani military officials, and several primary datasets explains the factors behind the violations and suggests ways to control them within the context of the broader bilateral political dispute. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Happymon Jacob is associate professor of diplomacy and disarmament studies at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has previously worked with the Observer Research Foundation (New Delhi), University of Jammu (J&K), Central European University (Budapest), and the Jamia Millia Islamia University (New Delhi), has participated in or organized some of the influential India-Pakistan Track II dialogues, and has written extensively on India’s foreign policy, the Kashmir conflict, India-Pakistan relations, and security issues in South Asia. Cover photo: Hindustan Times/Getty Images The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Turkish-Iraqi Border Security: an Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Approach
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND Make a charitable contribution HOMELAND SECURITY For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the Pardee RAND Graduate School View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world’s leading producer of Ph.D.’s in policy
    [Show full text]
  • The Tet Offensive 1968 Vietnam Light at the End of the Tunnel
    The Tet Offensive 1968 Vietnam The Tet Offensive was a military campaign conducted between 30 January and 23 September 1968, by forces of the Viet Cong, or National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam, and the North Vietnamese army, or People’s Army of Vietnam, against the forces of the Republic of Vietnam, (South Vietnam), the United States and their allies during the Vietnam War The purpose of the offensive was to strike military and civilian command and control centers throughout South Vietnam and to spark a general uprising among the population that would then topple the Saigon, government, thus ending the war in a single blow. The operations are referred to as the Tet Offensive because they began during the early morning hours of 31 January, the day of the most important Vietnamese holiday, Tet Nguyen Dan, which celebrates the first day of the year on a traditional lunar calendar. Both North and South Vietnam announced on national radio broadcasts that there would be a two-day cease-fire in honor of Tet also called "Spring Festival." In Vietnamese, the offensive is officially called Cuộc Tổng tiến công và nổi dậy năm 1968 ("The General Offensive and Uprising 1968"). The common name is (Xuân) Mậu Thân ("[spring] Year of the Monkey"). The Vietcong launched a major offensive beginning with a wave of attacks began on the morning of 30 January in the I and II Corps Tactical Zones. This early attack did not, however, cause undue alarm or lead to widespread allied defensive measures. When the main communist operation began the next morning, the offensive was countrywide in scope and well coordinated, with more than 80,000 Vietcong troops striking more than 100 towns and cities, including 36 of 44 provincial capitals, five of the six autonomous cities, 72 of 245 district towns, and the national capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounds of Trauma
    Vol 3 | No 1 | 2020 Sounds of Trauma Malini Sur Western Sydney University ABSTRACT | This article explores the sounds of trauma in anthropology. I ask: when, where, and under what circumstances do unmoored sounds and voices gain salience in anthropology? In particular, can methodological insights prepare anthropologists for the intense military scrutiny that societies endure in violent borderlands? Recalling the long tradition of orality in anthropology, I suggest that the slippery registers of sound and voice in trauma is generative not only of location and culture, but also of a perennial sense of dislocation. Writing anthropology demands the iterative re-dwelling and reliving of sound and voice that continually haunt, emerge, flow, and resurface across different stages of ethnographic labour. Disembodied sounds and voices generate indescribable languages. Based on my long term ethnographic fieldwork in the Northeast India-Bangladesh borderlands, I show how sensory modalities not only nourish divergent possibilities of meaning and emplacement but also register impasses of interpretation and displacement. Keywords: Borders; Sound; Voice; Trauma; Displacement This work is licensed under the Creative Commons | © M. Sur ISSN 2537-9879 | https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v3i1.6655 Published online December 15 2020 M. Sur 145 From within an Indian border outpost in Assam in May 2007, two months into my dissertation fieldwork, I stared at India’s newly constructed border fence with Bangladesh. Heavily armed Indian troops with guns and bullets strapped to their chests stood guarding the barrier, which cut through remote villages and rice fields. Wireless radios buzzed constantly. The border lines that divides the states of Assam and Meghalaya in Northeast India and Bangladesh are forcefully militarised.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Fortress Pitiunt: 3D-Reconstruction of the Monument Based on the Materials of Archaeological Research and Geological Paleoreconstructions
    applied sciences Article Roman Fortress Pitiunt: 3D-Reconstruction of the Monument Based on the Materials of Archaeological Research and Geological Paleoreconstructions Galina Trebeleva 1,* , Konstantin Glazov 1 , Andrey Kizilov 2 , Suram Sakania 3, Vladlen Yurkov 4 and Gleb Yurkov 5 1 Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117292 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Federal Research Centre, the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 354000 Sochi, Russia; [email protected] 3 Gulia Abkhaz Institute for Humanitarian Research, Academy of Sciences of Abkhazia, Suhum 384900, Georgia; [email protected] 4 Secondary School 171, 119270 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 5 N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The present study examined the references in the works of ancient authors to the ancient city and the Roman fortress Pitiunt, the geological aspects of the formation of the coastline in the Pitsunda Cape area in the first centuries AD and the results of archaeological research of the monument performed from 1952 to 1974. The creation of the 3D reconstruction of the exterior of the Pitiunt Citation: Trebeleva, G.; Glazov, K.; fortress during its prosperity in the IV century AD, along with the churches which were the first Kizilov, A.; Sakania, S.; Yurkov, V.; monuments of religious architecture in northwestern Colchis (northwestern Colchis comprises parts Yurkov, G. Roman Fortress Pitiunt: 3D-Reconstruction of the Monument of the territory of modern Russia, Georgia and Abkhazia) was carried out based on the excavation Based on the Materials of plans and the principles of fortification and temple architecture that were accepted in the late Roman Archaeological Research and times, paying special attention to the geological paleoreconstructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Text, Theory, Space: Land, Literature and History in South Africa And
    TEXT, THEORY, SPACE Text, Theory, Space is an unprecedented, landmark text in post-colonial criticism and theory. This outstanding and timely collection focuses on two white settler societies, South Africa and Australia, and explores the meaning of ‘The South’ as an aesthetic, political, geographical and cultural space. Arising from a conference sponsored by the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies and Sir Robert Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, this collection draws on expansive disciplines, including literature, history, urban geography, politics and anthropology. Issues of claiming, naming and possessing land; national and personal boundaries; and questions of race, gender and nationalism are also explored. Kate Darian-Smith is a lecturer in Australian Studies and Deputy Director at Sir Robert Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, University of London and is the author of On the Home Front and editor of History and Memory in Twentieth-Century Australia. Liz Gunner is a lecturer in African Literature at the School of Oriental and African Studies and is the editor of The Journal of Southern African Studies. Sarah Nuttall is a Research Fellow at the University of Cape Town and writes on South African literature. TEXT, THEORY, SPACE Land, literature and history in South Africa and Australia Edited by Kate Darian-Smith, Liz Gunner and Sarah Nuttall London and New York First published 1996 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Routledge is an International Thomson Publishing company © 1996 Kate Darian-Smith, Liz Gunner and Sarah Nuttall All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security in a Time of Transformation Two International Case Studies—Poland and India
    Border Security in a Time of Transformation Two International Case Studies—Poland and India CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Homeland Security & Counterterrorism CSIS Program, Europe Program, and South Asia Program 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 authors Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Rick “Ozzie” Nelson E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Heather A. Conley Teresita C. Schaffer Ben Bodurian Jamie Kraut T.J. Cipoletti Uttara Dukkipati Robin J. Walker July 2010 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Border Security in a Time of Transformation Two International Case Studies—Poland and India A Report of the CSIS Homeland Security & Counterterrorism Program, Europe Program, and South Asia Program authors Rick “Ozzie” Nelson Heather A. Conley Teresita C. Schaffer Ben Bodurian Jamie Kraut T.J. Cipoletti Uttara Dukkipati Robin J. Walker July 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]