DOCSLIB.ORG

JULY, 1937 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER* Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JULY, 1937 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER* Vol OFFICIAL STATE JULY, 1937 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER* Vol. 6—No. 7 «*•= PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS 1 f i CHARLES A. FRENCH Ten cents a copy — 50 cents a year Commissioner of Fisheries MEMBERS OF BOARD f -f 1 CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman Ellwood City ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor MILTON L. PEEK Devon South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. HARRY E. WEBER Philipsburg SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL NOTE Johnstown Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER EDGAR W. NICHOLSON should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either Philadelphia by check or money order payable to the Common­ KENNETH A. REID wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. Connellsville Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. FRED McKEAN New Kensington H. R. STACKHOUSE Secretary to Board PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ tions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to contributors. All contributions returned if accompanied by first C. R. BULLER class postage. Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte '^•i!~ =#?> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 6. No. 7 4^ &k ty* JULY'"37 ^ANGLER/ DO YOUR PART-REPORT POLLUTION FEW suggestions for sportsmen, when a pollution of water occurs. Very often you A hear the expression, can we help or what can we do? The season of hot weather and hot water is coming. This means less water for the same amount of fish and less air because of less water. This is a bad condition for fish as they must breathe. Take the air from the water in which they live and they die. Usually at this time of the year when the flow is abnormally low there are certain wastes dumped or at least find their way into our streams. Most of these wastes "grab" the oxygen from the water and start what will be a major killing offish, if it continues long enough. The horrible slaughter in French Creek, northwestern Pennsylvania, last summer is a perfect case of what happens when this pol­ lution occurs during low water. Actually tons of fish suffocated. In case of a fish killing, you ardent fishermen can show your interest and' help by observing a few simple rules which will not take much of your time. 1. Let us know promptly of any fish killings. A telegram or telephone call will allow us to have someone at the scene in time to know what is happening and trace the source of pollution. In a great many cases the actual killing starts a good distance below the pollution point. 2. Make note on paper of conditions at time of killing. Time it started, weather conditions, any peculiar actions of fish, general appearance of stream, etc. 3. Take samples of water in clean containers at time fish are suffering or killed. It is very important to use clean containers, bottles or jars which have been washed several times. When bottles are filled, place in cool place until advised where they can be analyzed. Remember promptness in reporting a pollution is of vital importance. Don't wait but let us know immediately. The pure streams bill, passed by the recent legislature, will surely mean the end of making cess pools and sewers out of our streams. This bill covers every kind of pollution except coal mine water, and as soon as the Sanitary Water Board can find a remedy, will also cover this form of pollution. C. A. FRENCH Commissioner of Fisheries PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER DEER EDITER A letter erbout trout fishin* from Ramapo Jones afor I stopped to talk erbout trav lin which do cum rite out an say what I think 'cause Penna. Angler, I cal 'late I won't ne'er do nohow, I git I no ut ain't yore fault the books needs a heep o' fun out a sich stories 'cause I help which I kin give 'em erbout trout Fish Commishun, don't no nothin' erbout 'em an' kint figger fishin'. You kin hook yore bate on ut what Harrisburg, Pa. out the mistakes the riters make but when I don't no on trout fishin' aint worth men' Deer Editer, I be a reeder o' yore I reeds what they rite erbout trout fishin' tionin' much less ritin' erbout which all magazin an' wants tu help you give an' sich things as I do no then I sees what them fellers has done an' is in yore books yore reeders sumpin' they'll like bet- little most of 'em reelly does no. (New an' which riles me up. So I reckoned I'd tern' us'al an' git a good laf out of parygraf) Now harken Deer Editer pleese orter take my pen in hand (I used a pencil an' hanker fer more so I be sendin' don't git the idee that I'm nockin' yore an' got a friend at the P'int to put ut in you a letter erbout trout fishin' which books or the way you runs things type ritin') an' rite you an' so help you be named Deer Editer an' which I 'cause I no you do the best you kin tell the tother readers o' yore books some hopes you'll side with yore new riter an' the books purty good an' any­ reel facts erbout trout fishin' which yore will improve yore books. What I says how you don't rite them stories writers has made 'em so mixed up in their erbout trout fishin' be reel honest yoreself which makes me so mad minds erbout an' not shore which ones to dope which be wuth printin' fer yore so we kin still be friends e'en if I beleeve nor tothers. (new parygraf) P.S' reeders. (New parygraf) The pitchers My boy, who thinks he nos a hell'v a lot my boy drawed be with the letter an' more'n his pappy since he's went to high I no you'll take to 'em 'cause my boy school at the P'int says I ortn't to rite (nev? be smart like I be an' makes good parygraf) but orter start a new line an' pitchers like I rites good. I tol' 'im, leave sum room even if I hadn't finished a bein' so smart like he be, not to ever line afore startin' the new parygraf but be President nohow but mayhap a I told him to shet his mouth an' not tell Deer Editer 'cause Editers nos ev'ry- his pappy what to do jist 'cause he's gettin' thin' like I rote you in tother letter. a edicashion which I an' maw have slaved Me an Maw an' the folks be all well to give 'im an' asides which you'd no what an' wishin you the same I be yore I means when I rote (new parygraf) 'cause friend an' new riter that's what Editers air fer ben't ut an anyhow ut wasted a heap a' paper to leave RAMAPO JONES. a lot a blank spaces with nothin' in 'effl- Ha Ha how could they be blank spaces if'n there was somethin in 'em. I didn't even make that one up it just cum natural EER EDITER, I be downrite mad, in like to me. I git that way when I'm mad 'cause the mad knocks the humor out o D fact, I be plum disgrunt'Pd an' when me Ha Ha again I bet I could sell that I gits that way, which I don't only seldum, one to a funny magazine I mean one what I be sartin to open my big mouth an' speak prints thines even funnier than you do rite out in meetin'. I no my mouth be big sumtimes Ha Ha Ha. I reckon that win 'cause I bin tol' aplenty off an' on by hold sum a them thar trout riters what ign'rant cusses which don't reelize the value makes me so all fired mad if'n they ever o' my deeper understandin' a' things an' see this letter which they will if'n yore a how much they could lam if'n they'd reel friend to yore reeders an' not skeert harken to me. But that don't tell you what to print what I no be the truth an' what I be mad erbout do ut. Ha ha—I bet yore I be aimin' to rite fer you fer 'em to reed hank'rin' to no. P.S. that Ha Ha don't mean erbout trout fishin' an' so help you make I ben't mad no more but ut means I saw yore books better which if'n you do I'l' what a joke ut was when I didn't tell you tell the drug store erbout so's he'll put yore fust off what I was mad erbout. Ha Ha! books out in front a all them thar tothers I never gits o'er my mads 'til I've had which also makes me mad but even more my say an' empteed my chest a' what's on so an' so more o' yore books will sell when ut. (New parygraf) I ben't one to beet you print my letter 'cause I'll buy one so 'round a bush 'speshly if thars a skunk or you better double the drug store amount hornets nest in ut so I'll tell you rite strate an' send 'em to (2) that month so's the frum the hip what's got me so all fired tother folks kin read the one (1) at the het up.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montgomery County Council Resolution
    Resolution No.: 18-1339 Introduced: November 27, 2018 Adopted: November 27, 2018 COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR THAT PORTION OF THE MARYLAND-WASHINGTON REGIONAL DISTRICT WITHIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND Lead Sponsor: County Council ______________________________________________________________________________ SUBJECT: Approval of Planning Board Draft Bicycle Master Plan 1. On May 7, 2018, the Montgomery County Planning Board transmitted to the County Executive and the County Council the Planning Board Draft Bicycle Master Plan. 2. The Planning Board Draft Bicycle Master Plan amends the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways within Montgomery County; the General Plan (on Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as amended; the Rustic Roads Functional Master Plan, as amended; the Preservation of Agricultural and Rural Open Space Functional Master Plan; the Aspen Hill Master Plan; the Bethesda Downtown Sector Plan; the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Master Plan; the Boyds Master Plan; the Burtonsville Commercial Crossroads Neighborhood Plan; the Capitol View and Vicinity Sector Plan; the Chevy Chase Lake Sector Plan; the Clarksburg Master Plan and Hyattstown Special Study Area, as amended; the Cloverly Master Plan; the Countywide Bikeways Functional Master Plan; the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan; the Damascus Master Plan; the East Silver Spring Master Plan; the Fairland Master
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020
    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan
    Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan December 2003 MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Montgomery County’s Water Quality Goals Montgomery County has a rich and diverse natural heritage, which includes over 1,500 miles of streams that provide habitat vital to aquatic life. To preserve this natural heritage, the County has adopted the following water quality goals (Montgomery County Code, Chapter 19, ArticleIV): • Protect, maintain, and restore high quality chemical, physical, biological, and stream habitat conditions in County streams that support aquatic life and uses such as recreation and water supply; • Restore County streams damaged by inadequate stormwater management practices of the past by re-establishing the flow regime, chemical and physical conditions, and biological diversity of natural stream systems as closely as possible through improved stormwater management practices; • Work with other jurisdictions to restore and maintain the integrity of the Anacostia River, the Potomac River, the Patuxent River, and the Chesapeake Bay; and • Promote and support educational and volunteer initiatives that enhance public awareness and increase direct participation in stream stewardship and the reduction of water pollution. What is the Countywide Stream Protection Strategy? The Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) first published the Countywide Stream Table 1. Montgomery County Stream Protection Strategy (CSPS) in 1998. The CSPS provides Resource Conditions County stream resource conditions on a subwatershed* (1994-2000) basis and recommends programs or policies to preserve, Percent Monitored protect, and restore County streams and watersheds. Condition Monitored Stream Miles Stream resource condition results for the year 2003 update Stream Miles are shown in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Points Within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill
    Public Access Points within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill Public Access Point Boat Ramp Fishing Swimming Restrooms Hiking/Trekking Location 2900 Virginia Ave NW, Thompson's Boat Center X X X X Washington, DC 20037 3244 K St NW, Washington, DC Georgetown Waterfront Park X X 20007 George Washington Memorial Theodore Roosevelt Island X X X Pkwy N, Arlington, VA 22209 West Basin Dr SW, Washington, West Potomac Park X X DC 20024 Capital Crescent Trail, Washington Canoe Club X Washington, DC 20007 600 Water St SW, Washington, DC Ganglplank Marina X X X X 20024 George Washington Memorial Columbia Island Marina X X X Parkway, Arlington, VA 22202 99 Potomac Ave. SE. Washington, Diamond Teague Park X X DC 20003 335 Water Street Washington, DC The Yards Park X 20003 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Anacostia Boat House X Washington, DC 20003 700-1000 Water St SW, Washington Marina X X X X Washington, DC 20024 Anacostia Park, Section E Anacostia Marina X X X Washington, DC 20003 2001-2099 1st St SW, Washington, Buzzard's Point Marina X X X DC 20003 2038-2068 2nd St SW, James Creek Marina X X X Washington, DC 20593 Anacostia Dr, Washington, DC Anacostia Park X X X 20019 Heritage Island Trail, Washington, Heritage Island X DC 20002 Kingman Island Trail, Washington, Kingman Island X DC 20002 Mt Vernon Trail, Arlington, VA Gravelly Point X X 22202 George Washington Memorial Roaches Run X X X X Pkwy, Arlington, VA 22202 1550 Anacostia Ave NE, Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens/Park X X X Washington, DC 20019 Capital Crescent Trail, Jack's Boat House X X Washington, DC 20007 Daingerfield Island X X X X 1 Marina Dr, Alexandria, VA 22314 67-101 Dale St, Alexandria, VA Four Mile Run Park/Trail X X X 22305 4601 Annapolis Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations for Memorials and Monuments on the National Mall
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (2008) - Sixth International Conference on Case Geotechnical Engineering Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 14 Aug 2008, 7:00 pm - 8:30 pm Foundations for Memorials and Monuments on the National Mall Douglas W. Christie Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, New York, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Christie, Douglas W., "Foundations for Memorials and Monuments on the National Mall" (2008). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 4. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/6icchge/session08/4 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOUNDATIONS FOR MEMORIALS AND MONUMENTS ON THE NATIONAL MALL Douglas W. Christie, P.E. Associate Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers New York, New York 10122 ABSTRACT As the western end of the National Mall in Washington, DC was made by filling in portions of the Potomac River, memorials and monuments have required deep foundations. The site history including stream channels, canals, and materials used in filling various areas has had a large impact on the development of the Mall.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzard Point, DC: a Brief History of a Brief Neighborhood
    Buzzard Point, DC: A Brief History of a Brief Neighborhood Hayden M. Wetzel November 2014 (revised) Mid -1920s, from a glass-plate negative (HSW) Sachse, 1884 (LOC) Foreword This short study of the almost forgotten (but soon to be resurrected) area of southwest Washington DC known as Buzzard Point grew out of a landmark nomination for the Buzzard Point Power Plant researched and written in 2014 on behalf of the Southwest Neighborhood Assembly. There was no dedicated study of the history of this curious neighborhood beyond its very early years (after which chronicles of southwest Washington move to the more northerly parts), and I decided to continue the work to fill this hole. Due to the work’s origin in the power plant that part of our story has been given somewhat disproportionate attention but I have left it that way; the information is interesting and useful. (Sections on the history of electrical power generation in Washington and the design/construction company Stone & Webster have been removed here but will be found in the nomination on file with the city’s Historic Preservation Office.) The supporting material used in this study has been deposited with the Historical Society of Washington. The Capitol Riverfront BID and the Southwest Neighborhood Assembly generously underwrote the expenses of printing this booklet, and Mr. Baubak Baghi helped prepare the manuscript. I offer them my sincere thanks, as also to the institutions listed below. Illustration sources: Library of Congress, Prints and Maps Division (LOC); Historical Society of Washington, Kipplinger Library (HSW); National Defense University library, Special Collections (NDU); National Archives, National Capitol Planning Commission (NARA); author (HMW) Hayden M.
    [Show full text]
  • BUZZARD POINT Vision Framework + Design Review Guide NOVEMBER 2017
    BUZZARD POINT Vision Framework + Design Review Guide NOVEMBER 2017 BUZZARD POINT Vision Framework + Design Review Guide A New Waterfront Neighborhood The vision for Buzzard Point is to be a well-designed and well-programmed neighborhood with multiple attractions, excellent architecture, accommodating parks and public realm, and destination waterfront with greatly improved multi- modal transportation connections. This concept involves creating strong relationships to the surrounding areas and the Anacostia River, enhancing the environment and leveraging public investment in the South Capitol Street Corridor and the Soccer Stadium Project as catalysts and anchors for additional private investment. This document outlines a trio of goals which are supported with design concepts, recommendations, and implementation guidelines, as well as the partnerships necessary to make this vision and these goals a reality. It also describes the broader context, relevant planning initiatives, and regional influences. Vision Frameworks are pragmatic strategic planning efforts. Through targeted public outreach and data analysis, Vision Frameworks deliver high-level aspirations for a neighborhood and identify key implementation items and design guidelines to direct public investment and private actions. A Small Area Plan, on the other hand, is a more in-depth plan that typically includes recommendations to change future land use designations within the Comprehensive Plan. Small area plans are submitted to and adopted by the DC Council by resolution. Since land use changes were not needed for Buzzard Point, the Vision Framework approach was selected as the planning tool. During the Comprehensive Plan Second Amendment process, currently underway, key recommendations from the Buzzard Point Vision Framework + Design Review Guide will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and submitted for DC Council adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTIONS Washington’S Southeast / Southwest Waterfront
    REFLECTIONS Washington’s Southeast / Southwest Waterfront CAMBRIA HOTEL Washington, DC Capitol Riverfront REFLECTIONS Washington’s Southeast / Southwest Waterfront Copyright © 2021 by Square 656 Owner, LLC Front cover image: Rendering of the Frederick Douglass Memorial ISBN: 978-0-578-82670-7 Bridge. The bridge connects the two shores of Designed by LaserCom Design, Berkeley CA the Anacostia River and is named after a former slave and human rights leader who became one of Washington’s most famous residents. District Department of Transportation vi FOREWORD REFLECTIONS Washington’s Southeast / Southwest Waterfront Marjorie Lightman, PhD William Zeisel, PhD CAMBRIA HOTEL Washington, DC Capitol Riverfront QED Associates LLC Washington, DC CAMBRIA HOTEL n REFLECTIONS vii Then ... A gardener’s residence on the site of the Cambria Hotel. The flat-roofed frame house, 18 feet wide and costing $1,800 to construct more than a century ago, was home to Samuel Howison, a market gardener. The cornice at the top of the building now graces the Cambria Hotel’s lobby, and a fireplace mantle accents the rooftop bar. Peter Sefton Now ... The Cambria Hotel at 69 Q Street SW, a part of the Southeast/Southwest waterfront’s renaissance. Donohoe Welcome to the Cambria Hotel Located in an historic part of one of the world’s great cities. ashington is a star-studded town where money and influence glitter on a world stage of W24/7 news bites. Images of the White House, the Capitol, and the Mall are recognized around the world as synonymous with majesty and power. Washington, the nation’s capital, shapes our times and history.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Minden Draft Comprehensive Plan July 2012
    Town of Minden Draft Comprehensive Plan July 2012 Prepared by the Town of Minden Planning Board 0 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 3 Part I: Introduction and the Planning Process ................................................................ 4 Historical Background on the Town ........................................................................... 6 Community Strengths and Weaknesses .................................................................... 8 Part II: Vision, Goals and Actions ................................................................................. 10 Minden’s Vision ........................................................................................................ 10 Long Term Goals for Minden ................................................................................... 11 Recommended Actions ............................................................................................ 14 A. Agriculture ........................................................................................................................... 14 Rural and Small Town Character ......................................................................................... 17 Environmental Resources ..................................................................................................... 22 Economy .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District of Coulmbia: the Likelihood of Shore Protection
    The Likelihood of Shore Protection in the District of Columbia James G. Titus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C. September 2005 Draft The final version of this document can be cited as: J.G. Titus. 2010. “District of Columbia.” In James G. Titus and Daniel Hudgens (editors). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 1: Mid- Atlantic. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official opinion of the Environmental Protection Agency. The primary referring page for this report is http://risingsea.net/ERL/DC.html CHAPTER 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : James G. Titus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [ 664 THE L I K E L I H O O D O F S H O R E P R O T E C T I O N I N T H E D I S T R I C T O F C O L U M B I A] CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................... 665 Background................................................................................................................................... 667 Response to Sea Level Rise ........................................................................................................ 671 Stakeholder Review...................................................................................................................... 679 A Note on Horizontal Scale.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Report to EPA and US Congress Regarding DC's Water Quality
    THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 2014 INTEGRATED REPORT TO THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 305(b) AND 303(d) CLEAN WATER ACT (P.L. 97-117) District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division i PREFACE The Water Quality Division of the District of Columbia's District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, prepared this report to satisfy the listing requirements of §303(d) and the reporting requirements of §305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). The report provides water quality information on the District of Columbia’s surface and ground waters that were assessed during 2012-2013 and updates the water quality information required by law. Various programs in the Natural Resources Administration contributed to this report including the Fisheries and Wildlife Division, the Stormwater Management Division, and the Watershed Protection Division. The Lead and Healthy Housing Division, Environmental Protection Administration also contributed to this report. Questions or comments regarding this report should be forwarded to the address below. The District of Columbia Government District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division 1200 First Street, NE 5th Floor Washington, D.C. 20002 Attention: N. Shulterbrandt ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]