DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ecology of Freedom Murray Bookchin Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ecology of Freedom Murray Bookchin Pdf The ecology of freedom murray bookchin pdf Continue The very notion of the domination of nature by man stems from the very real domination of man by man. With this brief formulation, Murray Bucchin launches his most ambitious work, The Ecology of Freedom. An attractive and highly readable book of breathtaking proportions, its inspired synthesis of ecology, anthropology and political theory traces our contradictory legacy of hierarchy and freedom from the first emergence of human culture to today's globalized capitalism, constantly pointing the way to a sound, sustainable ecological future. Murray Bookchin, co-founder of the Institute of Social Ecology, has been active in ecology and anarchist movements for more than 40 years. He is the author of numerous books and articles, he lives in Burlington, Vermont. 1982 book Murray Bookchin Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of the Hierarchy Cover of the first editionAuthorMurray BookchinyCountryCountryCountryCountry StatesLanguageEnglishSubjectHierarchyPublisherCheshire BooksPublication date1982Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)Pages480 (2005 edition)ISBN978-78190485926 0 (2005 edition) Part of the Policy Series on The Commune Concepts of commune (model of government) Confederation of Democratic Confederateism Dialectical Naturalism Libertarians Social Ecology People Murray Bookchin Janet Biel Abdullah Ocalan Practice Institute of Social Ecology Rojava Syrian Democratic Council Books Post-Scarcity Anarchism Ecology Of Freedom Our Synthetic Environment The Environmental Economy Green Anarchism Jineology Of Libertarian Socialism Lifestyle Lifestyle Anarchism Socialism Portal Socialism Portal Politics portalvte Ecology of Freedom: The emergence and dissolution of the hierarchy is a 1982 book by the American libertarian socialist and environmentalist Murray Bookchin, in which the author describes his concept of social ecology , the idea that environmental problems are caused by social problems and can only be solved by the reorganization of society. The book is considered a magnum opus By Bookchin, but it has also been criticized as utopian. Bookchin's summary is critical of the class analysis of Marxism and the simplistic anti-god forms of libertarianism and liberalism, and wants to present what he saw was a more complex view of society. Bookchin writes: My use of the word hierarchy in the subtitle of this work should be provocative. There is a strong theoretical need to counter the hierarchy with the wider use of class and state words; the careless use of these terms can lead to dangerous simplification of social reality. It is interchangeable to use the words of hierarchy, class and state, as many social theorists do, insidiously and obscurantly. This in the name of classless or or society can easily hide the existence of hierarchical relationships and hierarchical sensitivities, both of which - even in the absence of economic exploitation or political coercion - will serve to perpetuate non-freedom. Bookchin also points to the accumulation of hierarchical systems throughout history, which occurred before modern societies, which tend to define the human collective and individual psyche: The objective history of the social structure becomes internalized as a subjective history of the mental structure. Nefarious, in my opinion, can be modern Freudians, not the discipline of labor, and the discipline of government requires suppression of internal nature. These repressions then extend to the external nature as a simple object of government and then to exploitation. This mentality permeates our individual psyche in a cumulative form to this day, not only as capitalism, but also as a vast history of hierarchical society since its inception. The Acceptance Reviews of The Ecology of Freedom received positive feedback from Susan Marie Szasz in the Journal, a mixed review from Karen L. Field's American Anthropologist, and a negative review from political scientist Alan Wolfe in The Nation. Wolfe's review was followed by an exchange of letters between Bookchin and Wolfe. The book was also reviewed by R. Clark in New Scientist and R. Williams in The Technology Review. Sash described the book as well. Field wrote that Bookchin reminds us of what humanity was like, warns us of what it becomes, and dares to imagine that it could be in a social structure capable of interdependence and sensitivity to the environment, not competition and reluctant destruction. She attributed it to describing substantial differences of opinion between class and pre-class societies, explaining the philosophical link between the propensity to objectify nature and objectification of one's fellow, and providing a valuable inventory of Western anti-establishment currents from the Adamites and Runners until May 1968. However, she criticized his account of the emergence of civilization for its dependence on anthropologists Paul Radin and Dorothy D. Lee, and found that his description of pre-literate societies was oversimplified and disinfected in his emphasis on peaceful egalitarianism. She believed that he deliberately minimized the importance of technoeconomic factors and unconvincingly suggested age stratification as the key to domination. She also argued that part of the work was plagued by disappointing Eurocentrism and that she did not use recent literature on the place of technology in capitalist society. Wolfe wrote that while he was receptive to radical criticism of society, he found the book obsessive, dogmatic and wicked and did not believe in it get as much attention as he deserves. He criticized Bukchin's negative attitude towards the views of the New Age, his account of the development of modern society and the hostile language he used to describe many of the authors with whom he disagreed. He believes that work is utopian and does not explain how to solve the problems of society. Bookchin, in response, accused Wolfe of ignoring his central themes. Wolfe responded by accusing Bucchin of misrepresenting his criticism; he also accused him of self-centeredness. Other assessments by anarchist author Ulrike Haider described the Ecology of Freedom as a utopian work in which the social and political reality of the past, present and future has largely disappeared and capitalism is not mentioned or criticized. Bookchin responded in Raven: Anarchist quarterly, calling Haider's criticism unethical and a distortion of his views. He described Haider's claim that he did not criticize capitalism as fiction. Philosopher Stephen Best described the Ecology of Freedom as a classic, writing in Organization and the Environment that from Bookchin's books it is the one that best reflects the themes of his work as a whole. He attributed Tocchina's influential criticism of Marxist historical narratives; He noted that the book also influenced feminism. He praised Bukchin for his interpretation of history. However, writing in 1998, he noted that some of Bucchin's claims were controversial and that Bukchin had developed beyond certain positions in the book. Brian Tokar wrote in Nature Socialism that while the ecology of freedom was highly praised, it was also considered a utopian social critique. Philosopher Andrew Light wrote that the Ecology of Freedom was widely read by both theorists and practitioners in the environmental movement. He also suggested that it was Bukchin's most famous book. He attributed Tocchin's broadly developed and new perspective to social domination, writing that he made Bukchin one of the most read environmental thinkers in the last thirty years. Activist Joel Covel described the book as Bukchin's most important work. However, he criticized Bukchin's attitude towards Marx and Marxism. He compared The Ecology of Freedom to the Marxist-humanist philosopher Raya Dunayevskaya's Rosa Luxemburg, The Liberation of Women and Marx's Philosophy of the Revolution (1981), but did not believe that Bukchin would welcome this comparison. Political scientist Robin Eckersley described the book as a magnum opus by Bukchin. Philosopher John Clarke criticized the discussion of policy in Bookchin, claiming that he provided a small detailed discussion of environmental location and bioregional features, despite the theoretical commitment to such values. Janet Biel wrote that Ecology was one of Bukchin's most important books. She noted that while she is regarded as a magnum opus of Bukchin, she believes that some of Bucchin's subsequent books are at least as important. She attributed Tocchina's demonstration that the growth of the hierarchy undermined the complementarity of relatively egalitarian communities long before the advent of property. However, she also wrote that while he was working on the ecology of freedom, Bukchin was influenced by New Age Anthropology, which he later rejected. According to Biel, he regretted his influence on the book. Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan studied the Ecology of Freedom in a Turkish prison and was reportedly impressed by this work by releasing a manifesto entitled Declaration of Democratic Confederalism in Kurdistan in which he called on the Kurdistan Workers' Party to implement ideas of social ecology. Links to Bookchin 1982, page 3. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFBookchin1982 (help) - Bookchin 1982, p. 8. sfn error: several goals (2×): CITEREFBookchin1982 (help) - b Field 1984, page 161-162. a b Szasz 1982, p. 1475. a b Wolfe 1982, page 660-661. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFWolfe1982 (help) - b Bookchin 1982, p. 768. sfn error: several goals (2×): CITEREFBookchin1982
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Ecology and Communalism
    Murray Bookchin Bookchin Murray $ 12,95 / £ xx,xx Social Ecology and Communalism Replace this text Murray Bookchin ocial cology Social Ecology and Communalism and Communalism Social Ecology S E and Communalism AK Press Social Ecology and Communalism Murray Bookchin Social Ecology and Communalism Bookchin, Murray Social Ecology and Communalism Library of Congress Control Number 2006933557 ISBN 978-1-904859-49-9 Published by AK Press © Eirik Eiglad and Murray Bookchin 2006 AK Press 674–A 23rd St. Oakland, CA 94612 USA www.akpress.org [email protected] AK Press UK PO Box 12766 Edinburgh, EH8 9YE Scotland (0131) 555–5165 www.akuk.com [email protected] Design and layout by Eirik Eiglad Contents An Introduction to Social Ecology and Communalism 7 What is Social Ecology? 19 Radical Politics in an Era of Advanced Capitalism 53 The Role of Social Ecology in a Period of Reaction 68 The Communalist Project 77 After Murray Bookchin 117 An Introduction to Social Ecology and Communalism We are standing at a crucial crossroads. Not only does the age- old “social question” concerning the exploitation of human labor remain unresolved, but the plundering of natural resources has reached a point where humanity is also forced to politically deal with an “ecological question.” Today, we have to make conscious choices about what direction society should take, to properly meet these challenges. At the same time, we see that our very ability to make the necessary choices are being undermined by an incessant centralization of economic and political power. Not only is there a process of centralization in most modern nation states that divests humanity of any control over social affairs, but power is also gradually being transferred to transnational institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray Bookchin Reader
    The Murray Bookchin Reader We must always be on a quest for the new, for the potentialities that ripen with the development of the world and the new visions that unfold with them. An outlook that ceases to look for what is new and potential in the name of "realism" has already lost contact with the present, for the present is always conditioned by the future. True development is cumulative, not sequential; it is growth, not succession. The new always embodies the present and past, but it does so in new ways and more adequately as the parts of a greater whole. Murray Bookchin, "On Spontaneity and Organization," 1971 The Murray Bookchin Reader Edited by Janet Biehl BLACK ROSE BOOKS Montreal/New York London Copyright © 1999 BLACK ROSE BOOKS No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system-without written permission from the publisher, or, in the case of photocopying or other reprographic copying, a license from the Canadian Reprography Collective, with the exception of brief passages quoted by a reviewer in a newspaper or magazine. Black Rose Books No. BB268 Hardcover ISBN: 1-55164-119-4 (bound) Paperback ISBN: 1-55164-118-6 (pbk.) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 98-71026 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Bookchin, Murray, 1921- Murray Bookchin reader Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-55164-119-4 (bound).­ ISBN 1-55164-118-6 (pbk.) 1. Libertarianism. 2. Environmentalism. 3. Human ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Social-Ecological Perspective on Degrowth As a Political Ideology
    Capitalism Nature Socialism ISSN: 1045-5752 (Print) 1548-3290 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcns20 Beyond the Limits of Nature: A Social-ecological Perspective on Degrowth as a Political Ideology Eleanor Finley To cite this article: Eleanor Finley (2018): Beyond the Limits of Nature: A Social-ecological Perspective on Degrowth as a Political Ideology, Capitalism Nature Socialism, DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2018.1499122 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1499122 Published online: 23 Jul 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 36 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcns20 CAPITALISM NATURE SOCIALISM https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1499122 Beyond the Limits of Nature: A Social-ecological Perspective on Degrowth as a Political Ideology Eleanor Finley Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA ABSTRACT This article offers a critical analysis of the ideological position of degrowth from the perspective of social ecology. It agrees with Giorgios Kallis’ call to abolish the growth imperative that capitalism embodies today, but it also presents a critique of the conceptual underpinnings of this notion. More precisely, I argue that degrowth as an ideological platform reproduces a binary conception of society and nature, an oppositional mentality which is a key concept to hierarchical epistemology. Degrowth as a political agenda is thus prone to appropriation to authoritarian ends. In order to temper this tendency and help degrowth as a tool of analysis reach its liberatory potential, I advocate its consideration alongside a social-ecological position.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Anarchism.Pdf
    Changing anarchism Changing anarchism Anarchist theory and practice in a global age edited by Jonathan Purkis and James Bowen Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2004 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC- ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 0 7190 6694 8 hardback First published 2004 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Typeset in Sabon with Gill Sans display by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Manchester Printed in Great Britain by CPI, Bath Dedicated to the memory of John Moore, who died suddenly while this book was in production. His lively, innovative and pioneering contributions to anarchist theory and practice will be greatly missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Kurdish Ecology Initiatives in Syria and Turkey: Democratic Confederalism and Social Ecology
    Prospects for Kurdish Ecology Initiatives in Syria and Turkey: Democratic Confederalism and Social Ecology Stephen E. Hunt University of the West of England, Bristol ([email protected]) Abstract This paper surveys the nascent experiments in political ecology underway in predominantly Kurdish areas of south-eastern Turkey, known as Bakûr, and Rojava (northern Syria). The Kurdish freedom movement is attempting to consolidate a social revolution with ecology at its heart in a most unpromising context, given its ongoing struggle against Islamic State and regional embargoes. This greening of its ideology can be significantly attributed to the influence of American social ecologist Murray Bookchin, an inspiration for Kurdish attempts to implement democratic confederalism, which comprises principles of direct democracy, gender equality and ecological well-being in a needs-based economy. The Mesopotamian Ecology Movement has emerged from activist campaigns opposing dam construction, climate change and deforestation in the region, to inform ecology councils tasked with formulating policies that reflect this philosophical paradigm shift. The essay considers the prospects for the ecological initiatives in Turkish and Syrian Kurdistan. It argues that, confronted by formidable challenges, expansion of the democratic confederal model beyond the heartlands of Bakûr and Rojava, and international solidarity, are preconditions for their endurance. Keywords: Kurdistan; Rojava; environmental issues; social ecology; Murray Bookchin “The ecological struggle is the touchstone for the liberation of all humanity.” (MEM 2016a) There are nascent but already extraordinary experiments in political ecology underway in Kurdistan. Ecological well-being is one of the core principles of democratic confederalism emerging in the predominantly Kurdish areas of south-eastern Turkey, known by Kurds as Bakûr, and the autonomous cantons of Rojava, in northern Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookchin, Öcalan, and the Dialectics of Democracy,Maurizio Lazzarato
    What is the Workshop? The Workshop for Intercommunal Study: Critical Analysis for Collective Action “I can’t be a pessimist… because I’m alive. To be a pessimist means that you have agreed that human life is an academic matter. So I’m forced to be an optimist. I’m forced to believe that we can survive whatever we must survive.” —James Baldwin The Workshop for Intercommunal Study is a counter-institutional space dedicated to promoting and producing systemic analyses of capitalism and all its consequences, recuperating collective histories of anti-capitalist struggle, and identifying and theorizing emancipatory forms of social and political organization beyond capital. It’s hard to know exactly when it happened. Was it the day after Ferguson? The brutal foreclosure of the Arab Spring? The onset of the “financial” crisis of 2008? March 20, 2003? Or, maybe, five centuries ago? But since then, it has become increasingly clear that the dominant social dynamics we live—“economic” crisis, ubiquitous eliminationist wars, mass forced displacement, ecological devastation, and the paralysis of state institutions—are not aberrations, but the predictable and irreversible consequences of an unprecedented structural crisis of capital that (internal to its own logic) will only get worse. The fact that it is harder and harder to hide from this reality, however, in no way implies that we are prepared to understand (let alone change) it. To the contrary, at the very moment when the dominant institutions of this world (State, Nation, and Market) show signs of irreparable exhaustion, the sites entangled in these institutions—the media, the university, and the formal political arena—have been increasingly subordinated to the immediate and now impossible demands of capitalist growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecopolitical Philosophy, Education and Grassroots Democracy: the “Return” of Murray Bookchin (And John Dewey?)
    Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 9(2) 2017, pp. 7–14, ISSN 1948-9145, eISSN 2374-4383 ECOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, EDUCATION AND GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY: THE “RETURN” OF MURRAY BOOKCHIN (AND JOHN DEWEY?) MICHAEL A. PETERS [email protected] University of Waikato; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ABSTRACT. This article traces the “return” of Murray Bookchin whose work has been championed by Abdullah Öcalan, one of the founding members and leaders of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê, PKK). Bookchin’s “Democratic Conferalism” serves as a vehicle for taking seriously the notion of the local assembly within a broad non-state framework with an emphasis on inclusive- ness and especially women’s rights. Öcalan and the PKK have adopted Bookchin’s social ecology as the basis for the new society. This article examines Bookchin’s “return” in the light of these developments and examines grassroots or participatory democracy as the basis of ecopolitical philosophy and comments on some strong parallels with John Dewey’s “creative democracy.” Keywords: Bookchin; Kurdistan Workers’ Party; Öcalan; social ecology; participatory democracy; Dewey How to cite: Peters, Michael A. (2017), “Ecopolitical Philosophy, Education and Grassroots Democracy: The ‘Return’ of Murray Bookchin (and John Dewey?),” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 9(2): 7–14. Received 12 April 2016 • Received in revised form 13 May 2016 Accepted 13 May 2016 • Available online 1 June 2016 Murray Bookchin, the American anarchist and pioneering theoretician of social ecology, by his own admission failed to win many converts during his lifetime. Yet before his death in 2006 he influenced and made contact with Abdullah Öcalan, one of the founding members and leaders of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê, PKK).1 The PKK has been 7 waging a struggle against the Turkish State since 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Anarchism Rising. the Earth Liberation Front and the For.Pdf
    Eco-Anarchism Rising: The Earth Liberation Front and the formation of revolutionary environmentalism Sean Parson [email protected] Abstract: Critics and supporters often categorize the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) as an extension of Earth First! and the deep ecology movement. However, the group is not as cohesive and monolithic as is often assumed. The diversity of their ideology is evident in their communiqués and statements by spokespersons, Craig Rosenbaugh and Ashley Pickering. In the paper, I examine their communiqués, covering the period 1996-2003, and show that theirs is a complex ideology, which has shifted away from the radical ecology of Earth First! towards what Dave Garland, Steven Best, and Mark Somma call “revolutionary environmentalism.” In the ELFs' “revolutionary environmentalism" deep ecology, social ecology and green anarchist theories are combined with an adherence to propaganda by the deed to form a new syncretic ideology. In forging this new ideology the ELF also rejects the tenets of new social movements and instead embraces anarchist-organizing principles. “We are the burning rage of this dying planet.” – Beltane communiqué 19971 Many in the environmental movement view their struggle as a war - a war that holds all life on this earth in the balance. Daily, news stories and scientific papers come out, giving credence to this perspective. To deal with the destruction of the natural world, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), proudly proclaims that they “work to speed up the collapse of industry, to scare the rich, and to undermine the foundations of the State.”2 Though many environmental activists have engaged in ecotage– from the Fox in Chicago3 to Dave Foreman and early Earth First!er (EF’ers) - the ELF is arguably the first to forge a coherent eco-revolutionary program.4 In this revolutionary program the ELF rejects not only state-Marxism, but also liberal identity and single-issue politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Confederalism (Excerpts)
    Colophon in collaboration with New World Summit New World Academy Reader #5: [email protected] Stateless Stateless Democracy www.newworldsummit.eu Editors: New World Academy Renée In der Maur and Jonas Staal in Research, Development, Democracy dialogue with Dilar Dirik and Realization Team: Şeyma Bayram (BAK), Younes Associate Editor: Bouadi (NWS), Vincent W. J. van Şeyma Bayram Gerven Oei (NWS), Maria Hlavajova (BAK), Robert Kluijver (NWS), Paul Design: Kuipers (NWS), Renée In der Maur Remco van Bladel, Amsterdam (NWS), Rens van Meegen (NWS), in collaboration with Niek van der Meer (BAK), Arjan van Corine van der Wal Meeuwen (BAK), Kasper Oostergetel (NWS), Sjoerd Oudman (NWS), Ga- Lithography and Printing: briëlle Provaas (NWS), Rob Schröder Drukkerij Raddraaier, Amsterdam (NWS), and Jonas Staal (NWS) ISBN: 978-90-77288-22-1 Cover and Chapter Images: The cover image depicts members of The texts in this reader are published neighborhood councils and coopera- according to individual agreements tives presenting themselves as can- with the authors and/or publishers; didates for the position of Co-Chair New World Academy Reader #5: no part of this publication may be of the People’s Council for the city of reproduced in any manner without Qamişlo, situated in the Cizîre can- permission of the publisher. ton, Rojava. This and all other images in the reader are part of a 2014 photo © 2015 the artists, authors, BAK, and series by Jonas Staal, titled Anatomy New World Academy of a Revolution — Rojava. Published by: NWA #5 has been made financially BAK, basis voor actuele kunst possible by the DOEN Foundation, Postbus 19288 Amsterdam and is additionally sup- NL–3501 DG Utrecht ported through BAK’s partnership T +31 (0)30 2316125 with the Centraal Museum, Utrecht, [email protected] on the project Future Vocabularies- www.bakonline.org Future Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Paper No.37
    ERPI 2018 International Conference Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Conference Paper No.37 Re-enchantment of the Political: Abdullah Öcalan, Democratic Confederalism and the Politics of Reasonableness Patrick Huff 17-18 March 2018 International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) in The Hague, Netherlands Organized jointly by: In collaboration with: Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the authors in their private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of organizers and funders of the conference. March, 2018 Check regular updates via ERPI website: www.iss.nl/erpi ERPI 2018 International Conference - Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Re-enchantment of the Political: Abdullah Öcalan, Democratic Confederalism and the Politics of Reasonableness Patrick Huff Abstract With the military defeat of the self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS) at Raqqa, its defacto capital in Syria, Kurdish led Democratic Confederalists have established themselves as a major civil and military force in the region. Democratic confederalism rests on three primary ideological pillars: women’s liberation, direct communalist democracy, and ecologically sound society. Democratic Confederalists reject the state and capitalism as authoritarian and exploitive. Given the geopolitical tinderbox in which Democratic Confederalism has developed and gained increasing influence, the movement stands as the most geo-strategically significant anti-authoritarian populist movement afoot in Syria and the wider Middle East in the current conjuncture. The influence of Democratic Confederalism has also increased in North America and Europe with the formation and spread of radical left solidarity groups. Despite all this, outside of Kurdish activist circles, there has been relatively little scholarly engagement with the thought of Abdullah Öcalan, the imprisoned ideological leader of the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Communalism #15
    COMMUNALISM #15 International Journal for a Rational Society www.communalism.net AUGUST 2008 | FREE A Note from the Editors: Since the publication last year of Chuck Morse’s essay, “Being a Bookchinite,” In the second piece, “Measures of Failure and Success, Part I,” Eirik there has emerged a substantial debate. Much of this debate concerns not Eiglad offers a refutation of two of the more serious accusations that only the issues raised in the essay, but also the intellectual rigor of the Morse made in “Being a Bookchinite” and in doing so, highlights further essay itself; in fact, these two separate strands of the debate help to explain the problematic nature of the scholarship that marks the original essay. its extent. In the first instance, Morse laid some serious accusations at This further contribution to the debate raises an interesting thought: the foundations of social ecology, as represented in the work of Murray how can an essay that, as the two pieces claim, is woefully lacking in Bookchin and such serious accusations warrant serious attention. In the serious comment on Bookchin raise such a sustained debate? Is this not second instance, the way in which Morse presented his argument seemed to evidence enough of the importance of the work? Taken together, the two blur the line between theoretical insight and personal recollection, between articles presented here hopefully point to something different: that Morse’s discussions of Bookchin’s perceived theoretical problems and his perceived “Being a Bookchinite” falls below the standard of rigorous theoretical personal problems. Moreover, these two strands taken together presented a endeavor and in so doing, unwittingly highlights a recurrent problematic simplistic and unexplained caricature of Bookchin and his work.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Orientalism: Exploring the Distinctive Feminism of Democratic Confederalism in Rojava
    Beyond orientalism: exploring the distinctive feminism of democratic confederalism in Rojava Article (Accepted Version) Shahvisi, Arianne (2018) Beyond orientalism: exploring the distinctive feminism of democratic confederalism in Rojava. Geopolitics. ISSN 1465-0045 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/80502/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Beyond orientalism: exploring the distinctive feminism of democratic confederalism in Rojava Abstract Women have been central to the revolution in Rojava, leading to widespread interest in the Kurdish women’s movement across Western contexts.
    [Show full text]