DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Original Attachment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Original Attachment AECOM Wellington to Hutt Valley Cycle and Pedestrian Link Appendix H Project Safety Audit ACT THE UNDER INFORMATION RELEASED OFFICIAL 04-Dec-2014 Prepared for – New Zealand Transport Agency – Co No.: N/A Wellington to Hutt Valley Walking and Cycling Link Concept Design Stage Safety Audit ACT Report prepared for THE Wellington Office UNDER INFORMATION ViaStrada Ltd RELEASEDSecond draft 28 March 2014 OFFICIAL W2HV Cycleway i Concept design stage safety audit This document has been prepared for the benefit of NZ Transport Agency. No liability is accepted by ViaStrada Ltd, or any of its employees or sub-consultants with respect to its use by any other party. ACT THE Quality Assurance Statement Project Manager: ViaStrada Ltd Warren Lloyd Level 1, 284 Kilmore Street PO Box 22 458 Prepared by: Christchurch 8140 New Zealand UNDERWarren Lloyd Phone: (03) 366-7605 Fax: (03) 366-7603 Reviewed by: www.viastrada.co.nz Axel Wilke & Jon Ashford Project Number: 1042 INFORMATION Project Name: Wellington to Hutt Valley Link – Concept Design Safety Audit Document Version Date Final Report Second Draft 28 March 2014 First Draft 26 March 2014 RELEASED OFFICIAL W2HV Cycleway ii Concept design stage safety audit Table of Contents 1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 The safety audit team .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 The safety project team ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Report format ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Scope of audit ............................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Plans and documents provided ...................................................................................... 8 1.6 Project description ......................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Project objectives ........................................................................................................ 12 1.8 Terminology ................................................................................................................ACT 12 1.9 Disclaimer ................................................................................................................... 13 2 Safety audit team feedback ..................................................................................................THE 15 2.1 Safety audit team response to meeting project objectives ............................................ 15 2.1.1 Response to the NZ Transport Agency objectives ............................................... 15 2.1.2 Response to the AECOM objectives.................................................................... 16 2.2 Safety audit team response to specific project questions ............................................. 18 2.3 Safety audit team alternate routes and connections ..................................................... 24 2.3.1 Alternate route SH58 to Petone off ramp overpass .............................................. 24 2.3.2 Alternate connection at Petone ........................................................................... 24 2.3.3 Alternate connectionUNDER at Ngauranga underpass .................................................... 25 2.3.4 Alternate connection at Tinakori Road ................................................................. 26 3 Safety Audit Findings ........................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Safety audit team response to Section 1: ..................................................................... 27 3.1.1 Tinakori Intersection ............................................................................................ 28 3.1.2 Path widths, access INFORMATIONand use, surface and obstructions ....................................... 30 3.1.3 Shared path options A to D ................................................................................. 35 3.1.4 Bus stops and shelters ........................................................................................ 37 3.1.5 Aotea Quay overpass.......................................................................................... 38 3.1.6 Footbridge and Spotlight frontage ....................................................................... 40 3.2 Safety audit team response to Section 2 ...................................................................... 42 3.2.1 Path width ........................................................................................................... 42 RELEASED3.2.2 Bus stop & underpass ......................................................................................... 45 3.3 Safety audit team response to Section 3 ...................................................................... 46 OFFICIAL3.3.1 Section 3 Option 1 .............................................................................................. 47 3.3.2 Ngauranga interchange ....................................................................................... 47 3.3.3 Path widths, access and use, surface and obstructions ....................................... 49 3.3.4 Section 3 Option 3 .............................................................................................. 55 3.3.5 Preference for option 3 alignment ........................................................................ 55 W2HV Cycleway iii Concept design stage safety audit 3.3.6 Cross section SK 3310 Detail [F] ......................................................................... 56 3.3.7 Connection at Ngauranga ................................................................................... 57 3.4 Safety audit team response to Section 4 ...................................................................... 58 3.4.1 Section 4 Option 1 .............................................................................................. 58 3.4.2 Path widths ......................................................................................................... 58 3.4.3 Section 4 Option 3 .............................................................................................. 59 3.4.4 Rowing & Ski Club interaction ............................................................................. 59 3.5 Safety audit team response to Section 5 ...................................................................... 60 3.5.1 Section 5 Option 1 .............................................................................................. 60 3.5.2 Under the Petone Off ramp .................................................................................ACT 60 3.5.3 Upgraded shared path with contraflow ................................................................ 61 3.5.4 Path widths and obstructions............................................................................... 62 3.5.5 Section 5 Option 3 ..............................................................................................THE 63 3.5.6 Existing path link to Petone Station ..................................................................... 63 3.5.7 New path link to Petone Station........................................................................... 64 3.6 Safety audit team response to Section 6 ...................................................................... 64 3.6.1 McKenzie Avenue Bridge .................................................................................... 65 3.6.2 Petone Station .................................................................................................... 66 3.6.3 Petone Station highway overpass ....................................................................... 68 3.6.4 Pito-One Road pathUNDER ............................................................................................ 69 3.6.5 Korokoro Road.................................................................................................... 72 3.7 Safety audit team response to Section 7 ...................................................................... 74 3.7.1 Korokoro Road to Dowse Drive ........................................................................... 74 3.7.2 Dowse Drive Roundabout ................................................................................... 78 3.8 Safety audit team responseINFORMATION to Section 8 ...................................................................... 80 3.9 Safety audit team response to proposed On Road cycle facilities ................................. 81 3.9.1 Section 5 on road cycle provision ........................................................................ 82 3.9.2 Section 6 on road cycle provision ........................................................................ 84 3.9.3 Section 7 on road cycle provision ........................................................................ 85 3.9.4 Section 8 on road cycle provision ........................................................................ 86 4 Audit Statement ................................................................................................................... 90 RELEASEDAppendices Appendix A W2HV Overview Plan OFFICIALAppendix B Reviewed Plans Appendix C VicRoads Cycle Note 21: Charts Appendix D Cycling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Divisional Report 1
    Report 04.522 Date 30 August 2004 File E/06/19/04 Committee Passenger Transport Committee Author Dave Watson Divisional Manager Transport Divisional Report 1. Purpose To provide the Committee with information on a range of transport topics not otherwise covered elsewhere in the meeting’s order paper. 2. Financial performance (Vyvette Najbert) For the year ending 30 June 2004 the Division is showing an operating surplus of $864,867 which represents a $1,374,751 favourable variance on the YTD budget of $509,884. • Rail contract, overestimate of budgeted expenditure on inflation therefore related revenue from Transfund overstated, plus release of withholding monies. $332k favourable • Trolley bus contracts, underestimated the budget for inflation therefore related revenue from Transfund understated, net effect $630k adverse • Non-implementation of new kick-start services, and the cost of kick-start projects coming in below budget. Net effect $754k favourable • Patronage funding growth payment $1.36m below budget • Patronage funding credits contributing to new Hutt Valley services $1.38m which offsets additional costs for Hutt Valley new services and additional tender costs for bus contracts, net effect on bus contracts $697k favourable • General admin, budget included funding of overheads, which were not approved by Transfund, $244k adverse • Due to the availability of patronage funding credits the following were fully funded thus releasing the budget that was allocated to the projects: Wellington interchange $761k, Petone station $554k,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    AECOM Wellington to Hutt Valley Cycle and Pedestrian Link Appendix M Environmental Screen RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 04-Dec-2014 Prepared for – New Zealand Transport Agency – Co No.: N/A October 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SCREEN (2013) The purpose of the screen is to identify opportunities, inform the risk management process and ensure the environmental and social matters PROJECT TITLE: W2 HV Walking& Cycling Link of a highway project have been addressed. The questions below have been categorised into five areas for ease of reference, however a number of the questions relate to multiple categories (refer to ESR Screen explanation). For example the educational sites not only provide information pertaining to human health, but also social effects which will inform the urban design outcomes for the project. Generally this table can be OPTION: 1 Existing Shared Path Improvements completed by the project Resource Management Planner. CATEGORY OF EFFECT QUESTION INFORMATION SOURCE ANSWER (CIRCLE) RESPONSE/NOTE Urban/ Peri-urban Connects urban conurbations of Wellington and the Hutt Valley. Where is the project located? NZTA GIS, Stats NZ Rural >18 months What is the construction timeframe? Project Team <18 months New / Altered Option is partly within KiwiRail Designation NZR3 in HCC District Plan and partly within KiwiRail Designation R5 in the WCC District Plan. It is also part of the related What are the designation requirements? Resource Planner designations for Highway Purposes (SH2 in the WCC and HCC District Plans. SOCIAL N/A Y It is specifically a walking and cycling project. Does the option enhance cycling facilities? Project team, Regional Land Transport Plan N At the Petone end the option requires the railway line to be shifted on to the edge of Y land at the western end of the Petone Esplanade Reserve known as the Korokoro Does the option affect public open space? District Plan Gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Hutt Is Far More Further Bans on Smoking in Public Prevalent Among Maori (35.5 Per Places
    BACK TO FUTURE CRAZY CALM Original look No upsets in for Settlers Crazyman Museum P3 smooth run P64 The Hutt News Tuesday, May 3, 2016 Stamping out public smoking NICHOLAS BOYACK BY THE NUMBERS Hutt City Council is considering Smoking in Lower Hutt is far more further bans on smoking in public prevalent among Maori (35.5 per places. cent) and Pacific (24.9) residents A report to the council’s policy than Europeans (15.30). The lowest committee recommends making socio-economic areas, particularly large parts of the city smokefree. Naenae and Wainuiomata, have the The proposal is being driven highest rates. by officers, who have prepared a detailed report. Previous attempts to broaden the existing ban on smoking in playgrounds to other Policy manager Wendy Moore council-owned or administered told Hutt News there was no way facilities have been rejected by council can actually enforce a politicians. ban. The call is for a ban to be A change of legislation was extended to sports grounds, necessary to give council the beaches, bus stops and train power to introduce and enforce stations, as well as all outdoor by-laws. dining areas. But a smokefree policy would A survey of 732 residents found at least reinforce the view that overwhelming support, at 95 smoking was not acceptable. percent, for no smoking at chil- Backed by signage she said it dren’s playgrounds. would send smokers a clear mess- There was also strong support Rita Kniazeva and Natalia Kotova support Hutt City Council playgrounds being smokefree. They believe children such as age that their habit was unaccept- for a ban on lighting up at bus one- year old Andrew, should never be exposed to second-hand smoke.
    [Show full text]
  • TAKING the HIGH ROAD: Retrofitting Amenity Onto Urban Arterial Roads by PAUL DEY a 120-Point Thesis Submitted to the Victori
    TAKING THE HIGH ROAD: Retrofitting amenity onto urban arterial roads BY PAUL DEY A 120-point thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture (Professional) Victoria University of Wellington School of Architecture 2017 i How might New Zealand’s urban arterial roads be architecturally retrofitted with improved amenity values to counteract the negative environmental and social effects of high-capacity traffic infrastructure? ii ABSTRACT Amenity values on urban arterial roads are fraught. This is largely due to the traditional traffic capacity versus amenity trade-off. This trade-off implies that high-capacity roads must be inherently deficient in amenity due to issues of air quality, noise nuisance and the physical barrier of streams of traffic. However, a more nuanced position – and one adopted by this thesis - is that arterial roads can be both busy thoroughfares and active, enjoyable destinations. This design-led research explores retrofitting amenity values onto existing arterial roads, creating new spaces and improving qualities of a system not originally constructed with amenity in mind. Cuba Street in Lower Hutt is a regionally significant connector intended for future densified development. In addition to the current link function, this road needs to become more attractive as a destination and address. Consideration at the urban scale encourages broad, strategic planning to support amenity holistically. This urban planning addresses topics like desirable densification, transit- oriented development, walkable centres and how these affect the arterial road condition. In moving from urban-scaled to architectural design, the detailed implementation of the greater policies is tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Cool Cats of Hutt Technology
    CEMETERY FULL EV GOES FREE Head north Park up for final and plug rest P3 in P24 The Hutt News Tuesday, June 14, 2016 Ailsa Webb won a prize for science education. She was snapped with MindLab’s Malcolm Clarke, Education Minister Hekia Parata and Hutt City Mayor Ray Wallace. The best technology companies are bright, nimble and flexible and so was the entertainment for the awards night - as was ably demonstrated by the gymnastic Mim Syme, of Moe (Makers of Entertainment). Cool cats of Hutt technology BLAKE CRAYTON-BROWN Valley’s best and brightest. recognised,’’ Parata said. classroom working with NIWA. observed the differences they saw. ‘‘The contribution they are ‘‘I was especially impressed by Her passion for science carried This showed them the impact The top cats of business and edu- making to the STEMM sectors on Wilford School, which is doing a over to her students, with four of stormwater drains and pol- cation in the Hutt Valley gathered a local, national, and global stage fantastic job of nurturing future Wilford School pupils winning lution on the oceans. at the old Ford factory in Seaview is why the Hutt Valley is Tech- scientists and innovators.’’ this year’s primary Young Sci- for a celebration of their success. nology Valley.’’ Ailsa Webb, a teacher at the ence Achiever award. ❚ Other winners on the night were AROTEC This year’s Technology Valley Education Minister Hekia Petone school, was one of the The pupils, Harvey Butler, Diagnostics as Business of the Year; Avalia Awards last Thursday were held Parata said she was highly award winners on the night, Ethan Neru, Jemma Allwood and Immunotherapies as Emerging Business of as part of the Valley’s STEMM impressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hutt Valley) Public Transport Service Review Project Brief
    Attachment 1 to Report 13.124 Page 1 of 2 Eastern Area (Hutt Valley) Public Transport Service Review Project Brief The purpose of an area-wide service review is to deliver an effective and efficient integrated public transport network. Area-wide reviews provide an opportunity to maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of the passenger transport network by allowing consideration of the interaction between all public transport services within a large geographical area. The reviews are undertaken with the intention there will be no additional cost to the ratepayer. They take a short to medium term view, focusing on operational and efficiency improvements to the network. Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) has an ongoing programme of area-wide reviews, which is in accordance with policies laid out in the Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 2011-2021(RPTP). The RPTP requires regular service reviews to be carried out to ensure public transport services operate effectively and efficiently as part of an integrated public transport network. Regular service reviews provide an opportunity to consider the extent to which public transport services meet customer demand. Key considerations when undertaking service reviews are to ensure value for money and to balance service levels with demand. The programme of area-wide service reviews contained within the RPTP indicated that a Hutt Valley area wide review of public transport services would be undertaken across the financial years 2012/13 and 2013/14. The Hutt Valley Public Transport Service Review will include all urban bus, rail and ferry services in Upper and Lower Hutt, and will also give consideration to east-west links between Porirua and the Hutt Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • M W Caring for Your Park Tga Pack in and Pack Out
    rm m w Caring for your park TgA Pack in and pack out. Take your rubbish home and recycle it ' ” where possible. m . Dogs are permitted in the Korokoro, Stratton Street and Dry Creek Valleys. No dogs on or near farmland. Belmont ^ Do not remove, disturb or damage plants or animals. t Regional Park Light no fires. You are welcome fo bring a portable gas barbecue. Use gates and stiles. Leave gates as you find them. I Poison may be laid in the park to control possums. Do not remove • notices or disturb baits, lures, trapping lines or carcasses. s lit The Greater Wellington Regional Council promotes Quality for Life by ensuring our environment is protected while w greater WELLINGTON meeting the economic, cultural and social needs of the community REGIONAL COUNCIL Belmont Te Pane Matua Taiao REGIONAL PARK T ■ 'i I Open tops and hidden valleys Photos of Belmont Trig, Korokoro Valley and View to Porirua by Jessica Dewsnap.PhotoofTararua Tramping Club members at BelmontTrig, The breathtaking views and bush clad valleys of Belmont 1927 by unknown photographer; ATL PA1-O-6B0-01-2 Regional Park make it a favourite open space for walking, running, mountain biking and horse riding. Located in the hill country between Porirua and the Hurt Valley, the MORE INFORMATION park features the historic Korokoro Dam, World War II munitions bunkers and the original coach road from Ranger - Belmont Regional Park Lower Huff to Pauatahanui. The climb to Boulder Hill GWRC Parks & Forests (442m) or Belmont Trig (457m) gives sweeping views over 282 Stratton Street, Maungaraki, Lower Hutt Porirua and Wellington harbours and the Hurt Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVISION for CYCLISTS in SOUTHWEST PETONE Report for Hutt City Council
    PROVISION FOR CYCLISTS IN SOUTHWEST PETONE Report for Hutt City Council Barclay Traffic Planning P O Box 31531 Lower Hutt 5040 Phone: 04-939 0823 Fax: 04-939 3546 March 2012 PROVISION FOR CYCLISTS IN SOUTHWEST PETONE Report for Hutt City Council Barclay Traffic Planning P O Box 31531 Lower Hutt Tel. 04-939 0823 Fax 04-939 3546 March 2012 © 2012 W. J. Barclay trading as Barclay Traffic Planning This report has been prepared for Hutt City Council in accordance with a particular brief and may not be used for other purposes without our prior review and agreement. Cover: View of Hutt Road near Wakefield Street and Dowse Interchange. PROVISION FOR CYCLISTS IN SOUTHWEST PETONE Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF ROAD NETWORK ............................................................................... 3 2.1 Hierarchy ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Road characteristics .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Road safety .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hutt Valley Public Transport Review 1
    Report 14.547 Date 23 January 2015 File TD/03/15/07 Committee Strategy and Policy Committee Author Matthew Lear, Team Leader, Network Service Design & Bus & Ferry Infrastructure Hutt Valley Public Transport Review 1. Purpose To approve the recommendations from the Hutt Valley Public Transport Review and agree that the review is substantively complete. The only outstanding items relate to operational matters which are required to implement the recommendations. 2. Background Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) has undertaken a review of public transport services within the Hutt Valley. The review began under the remit of the Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 2011-2021 which required regular service reviews to be carried out to ensure public transport services operate effectively and efficiently as part of an integrated public transport network. The Business Case for the review was approved by the Economic Wellbeing Committee on 26 March 2013 (Report 13.124). Report 13.124 detailed the following points to be addressed as part of the review scope: • bus, train, and ferry connectivity • patronage, capacity, and demand • changes in travel patterns • changes in population catchments and land development • span of service hours • frequency of services; and • the potential for east-west links. 1416263-V4 PAGE 1 OF 16 The review assumptions were about fine tuning current services to provide an improved level of service for customers, rather than a need for a fundamental redesign of the current network. 3. Project Timeline The review has met the planned timeline. The table below details the project timeline and the milestones achieved: Milestone Date Status 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Maara Roa Valley Loop — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa
    10/7/2021 Maara Roa Valley Loop — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Maara Roa Valley Loop Walking Circular Track (Loop) Difculty Medium Length 3.2 km Journey Time 1 hour 30 mins Region Wellington Sub-Regions Lower Hutt , Porirua , Wellington City Part of Collections Greater Wellington , Belmont Regional Park https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/maara-roa-valley-loop/pdfPreview 1/4 10/7/2021 Maara Roa Valley Loop — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Track maintained by Greater Wellington Regional Council A walk through farmland and around the Cannons Creek forest. Enter at Takapu Road and follow the track towards the right for views of the Cannons Creek headwaters and Cannons Head. Giving good views of the proposed Transmission Gully motorway route, the walk follows the farm track around to the left passing regenerating native forest and new plantings. Continue on to the bridge over Cannons Creek then a steady climb back up to Takapu Road for great views over Porirua Harbour. Not suitable for mountain buggies. No dogs. Conditions: The park has moderately steep hills and is exposed on the tops to wind, rain and mist. Weather conditions can change quickly so please: check the weather forecast before your trip carry warm and waterproof clothing and enough food and drink for your trip carry sun protection plan your route and tell someone your intentions wear strong lace-up boots or walking shoes avoid streams during heavy rain Farmed areas of the park will be closed for lambing and calving; including both sides of Transmission Gully from the 20 August to 19 October 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Hutt Valley Vintage Postcards
    Pandora Research www.nzpictures.co.nz Hutt Valley Vintage Postcards Publisher Earliest Date Comment Days Bay At the Croydon School Sports, Days Bay ZAK-7327 1909 Days and Rona Bays, Wellington FT-2414A Days Bay Fergusson-Industria Days Bay near Wellington FT-357 Days Bay Recreation Grounds, Wellington Unknown Days Bay, Wellington Fergusson-Industria-5819 Days Bay, Wellington FT-1101 Days Bay, Wellington GM-W26 Days Bay, Wellington Grabham-14 Days Bay, Wellington Royal-894 Days Bay, Wellington SM Co. 23 Mar 1904 Tomlinson Photo Days Bay, Wellington Tanner Days Bay, Wellington Tourist-346 Days Bay, Wellington Universal Days Bay, Wellington Unknown 22 Nov 1907 Days Bay, Wellington Unknown (2) Days Bay, Wellington W & T Series Days Bay, Wellington (The Pier showing ss Duco & Duchess) Fergusson-Industria General View Days Bay, Wellington Tanner-1006 F. G. Barker Photo Kia Ora Days Bay, Wellington FT Series The Pavilion, Days Bay Aldersley-A9750 The Water Chute, Days Bay, Wellington Fergusson-Industria-W21 1910 The Water Chute Days Bay, Wellington Fergusson-Industria-W32 Aldersley Photo With Every Good Wish Days Bay, Wellington FT-X86-137 Eastbourne Days and Rona Bays, Wellington FT-2414A Eastbourne, Wellington Tanner-100-242 Rona Bay Aldersley-830 Rona Bay, Wellington Fergusson-Industria-5824 Rona Bay, Wellington GM-5824 Rona Bay, Wellington GM-15824 27 Dec 1916 Rona Bay, Wellington Tanner-2341 Rona Bay, Wellington Tanner-3288 Dawn Chambers – Email: [email protected] Last updated 06 October 2020 Page 1 of 7 Pandora Research www.nzpictures.co.nz
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Projects to 2004
    Report 01.814 28 November 2001 File: TP/1/4/1 [01.814_djw] Report to the Passenger Transport Committee From Dr D J Watson, Division Manager Transport Progress on Implementing the Public Transport Projects of the RLTS – December 2001 1. Purpose To inform the Committee of progress implementing the public transport projects of the RLTS. To propose that the Passenger Transport Committee report to the next RLTC on its progress in implementing the RLTS. 2. Background The RLTS is the Region’s land transport strategy and is adopted by the Council. The Passenger Transport Committee is tasked with implementing the strategy commensurate with the financial constraints set down in the Council’s long term Financial Strategy. Attachment 1 is an example of an RLTS, Public Transport Progress Report presented to the RLTC in the last triennium. The remainder of this current report follows that example and is an update on progress. 3. Report on the progress made by the Public Transport Committee of the Wellington Regional Council in implementing the Public Transport Projects of the Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 1999-2004 (a) Western Corridor (Otaki to Wellington) Public Transport Projects to 2004 − Upgrade the Paraparaumu railway station building 2 − Build a new railway station at Raumati − Extend the urban electric rail service to Waikanae − Increase weekday urban rail service frequency from the Kapiti Coast to Wellington to 15 minutes in peak period and 30 minutes in off peak − Provide additional commuter car and cycle parks at major railway stations − Increase rail feeder services to match the increase in urban rail frequency The projects that require capital investment and hence could only be funded through a medium to long term service agreement remain stalled.
    [Show full text]