2015 Campus Freedom Index 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015 Campus Freedom Index 1 Contents The 2015 Campus Freedom Index 1 Executive Summary 1 Free expression in 2015: the best and the worst universities 3 Significant changes in 2014-2015: The Good 4 Significant changes in 2014-2015: The Bad 4 The State of Free Speech at Canada’s Universities 5 The State of Free Speech at Canada’s Student Unions 7 Methodology and Grading Criteria 10 The legal obligation of universities to defend free expression 13 “Speech Codes” at Canadian universities 13 About the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms 17 About the authors 18 The State of Campus Free Speech in 2015 19 - 242 2015 Campus Freedom Index Acadia University, Wolfville, NS 19 Bishop’s University, Lennoxville, QC 22 Brandon University, Brandon, MB 24 Brock University, St. Catherines, ON 28 Cape Breton University, Sydney, NS 33 Capilano University, North Vancouver, BC 35 Carleton University, Ottawa, ON 39 Concordia University, Montreal, QC 44 Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS 51 Grant McEwan University, Edmonton, AB 58 Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BC 60 Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON 63 Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON 66 McGill University, Montreal, QC 69 McMaster University, Hamilton, ON 75 Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 79 Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB 82 © Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. All Rights Reserved #253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW • Calgary, AB • T2V 1K2 Phone: (403) 475-3622 JCCF.ca Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB 84 Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS 89 Nipissing University, North Bay, ON 91 OCAD University, Toronto, ON 94 Queen’s University, Kingston, ON 100 Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC 104 Ryerson University, Toronto, ON 106 Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS 113 Saint Paul University, Ottawa, ON 117 Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC 119 St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS 122 St. Thomas University, Fredericton, NB 125 Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC 127 Trent University, Peterborough, ON 131 University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB 135 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC 139 University of Calgary, AB 147 University of Guelph, ON 152 University of King’s College, Halifax, NS 158 University of Lethbridge, AB 161 University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB 164 University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB 169 University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC 171 University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON 173 University of Ottawa, ON 177 University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE 183 University of Regina, Saskatchewan 188 University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon 192 University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC 195 University of Toronto, ON 198 University of Victoria, BC 205 University of Waterloo, ON 211 University of Windsor, Ontario 214 University of Winnipeg, Manitoba 220 Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC 223 Western University, London, ON 227 Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON 231 York University, Toronto, ON 235 The 2015 Campus Freedom Index Executive Summary The 2015 Campus Freedom Index is the fifth annual report released by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) to measure the state of free speech at Canada’s universities. Starting with a survey of only 18 universities in 2011, this year’s edition has grown to include 55 publicly funded Canadian universities—the largest and most expansive Index released so far, with information relevant to the more than 750,000 students who attend these institutions. The 2015 Campus Freedom Index includes an individual report about each university and student union. The Campus Freedom Index is the first report of its kind in Canada to measure the state of free speech at Canadian universities. While other major Canadian university rankings provide statistics on student life, classroom size and faculty quality, the Campus Freedom Index is the first resource available for Canadian high school students and parents to help them to choose a school that will encourage—not stifle—their free expression rights on campus. This report also provides information to aid current students, as well as faculty and administrators, in improving the state of free at their schools, by clearly indicating which policies and practices support free speech and which of these needs to be improved. With 220 grades awarded to 55 campuses, Canada’s universities and student unions in 2015 have received only eight ‘A’ grades—less than 5%, and only three more ‘A’ grades than were awarded in 2014. Conversely ‘F’ grades were earned 41 times: 15 times by universities, and 26 times by student unions. In total, Canada’s universities and students earned eight more ‘F’ grades than they did in 2014. There are 24 campuses that earned at least one ‘F’—the same total as last year, but this year’s Index included more universities. — 1 — 2015 Campus Taxpayer University University Student Union Student Union Freedom Index Funding Policies Practices Policies Practices millions % op. budget 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Acadia University 31.5 33% B B C C C D A A Bishop’s University 23.5 46% C C C C D D C C Brandon University 39.4 66% C C C C F F B B Brock University 90.7 29% C B C D C C B B Cape Breton University 21.8 42% D D F F D D C C Capilano University 35.9 41% NA C NA D NA F NA D Carleton University 161.8 41% D D C C B B B A Concordia University 296.0 57% C C D F C D D F Dalhousie University 212.8 54% C C F F F F D D Grant McEwan University 114.4 50% NA D NA C NA F NA D Kwantlen Polytechnic University 66.8 43% C C D D D F D D Lakehead University 62.5 54% D D D D F F F F Laurentian University 76.8 45% B B A A D F C C McGill University 657.3 56% D D D C D D F F McMaster University 228.3 40% B B C C C C D D Memorial University of Newfoundland 440.8 70% C C C A D D F F Mount Allison University 22.1 49% F F D D D D B B Mount Royal University 84.1 39% C C F C D D D D Mount Saint Vincent University 19.9 39% C C C C D F C C Nipissing University 35.1 51% C C C C C D C C OCAD University 27.1 37% C C D D D D C D Queen’s University 366.2 43% C C F D D C C C Ryerson University 207.8 46% C C A A D D F F Royal Roads University 17.8 29% NA D NA C NA D NA C Saint Mary’s University 36.0 30% D C F F D F D D Saint Paul University 6.3 34% NA F NA C NA C NA C Simon Fraser University 224.3 48% C C B B C C C C St. Francis Xavier University 32.2 44% D D B B D D C C St. Thomas University 14.1 46% B B B B D D D D Thompson Rivers University 73.8 41% NA D NA B NA C NA C Trent University 51.2 51% C C D D D D F F University of Alberta 897.0 49% B B C F F F C C University of British Columbia 513.0 51% C C C F D D D D University of Calgary 741.6 60% D D C D D F F C University of Guelph 247.4 36% C C C C D D F F University of King’s College 5.6 27% C D A B C C C C University of Lethbridge 99.0 67% B B B F D D C A University of Manitoba 368.6 43% C D C C D F F D University of New Brunswick 112.0 61% C C D A D D C C University of Northern British Columbia 48.3 59% C C C C C D B B University of Ontario Institute of Tech- 62.1 62% NA D NA C NA D NA C University of Ottawa 379.9 49% D F F F D F D D University of Prince Edward Island 102.9 52% C C F F D F D D University of Regina 113.1 56% B C F F D D C C University of Saskatchewan 337.6 66% C C C C B B C C University of the Fraser Valley 55.8 49% C D F F D D D C University of Toronto 1,723.8 61% A A F B D D F F University of Victoria 244.0 47% C C F F F F C F University of Waterloo 209.6 34% D D F D C B D D University of Windsor 97.2 38% C C D D D C D C University of Winnipeg 56.1 59% C C C C D D C C Vancouver Island University 57.5 43% D C D C C B C B Western University 279.7 40% B B D D D C F D Wilfrid Laurier University 100.5 39% C C D D D D D D York University 371.7 37% D D D D F F D D — 2 — Free expression in 2015: the best and the worst universities Best Universities Policies Practices 2014 2015 2014 2015 1 Laurentian University B B A A 2 Ryerson University C C A A 3 Memorial University of Newfoundland C C C A 4 University of New Brunswick C C D A Worst Universities Policies Practices 2014 2015 2014 2015 1 University of Victoria C C F F 2 University of the Fraser Valley C D F F 3 Concordia University C C D F 4 Cape Breton University D D F F 5 University of Alberta B B C F 6 University of Prince Edward Island C C F F 7 University of Regina B C F F 8 Dalhousie University C C F F 9 Mount Allison University F F D D Best Student Unions Policies Practices 2014 2015 2014 2015 1 Carleton University Students Association (CUSA) B B B A 2 Vancouver Island University Students’ Union (VIUSU) C B C B 3 University of Lethbridge Student Union (ULSU) D D C A 4 University of Saskatchewan Students’ Union (USSU) B B C C Worst Student Unions Policies Practices 2014 2015 2014 2015 1 Ryerson Student Union (RSU) D D F F 2 University of Victoria Students Society (UVSS) F F C F 3 Lakehead University Students’ Union (LUSU) F F F F 4 Concordia Students’ Union (CSU) C D D F 5 Students Society of McGill University (SSMU) D D F F 6 Dalhousie Student Union (DSU) F F D D 7 Memorial University of Newfoundland Students’ Union (MUNSU) D D F F 8 University of Toronto Students Union (UTSU) D D F F 9 York Federation of Students (YFS) F F D D — 3 — Significant changes in 2014-2015: The Good Carleton University Students’ Association – from B to A The Carleton University Students’ Association (CUSA) has been improving its position in the Index steadily since 2012, when it still had speech-restricting clauses in its Discrimination on Campus Policy, which had been used to deny ratification to student groups with pro-life views.
Recommended publications
  • The Cord Weekly (November 19, 1992)
    THE CORD A WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY STUDENT PUBLICATION VOLUME XXXIII ISSUE 14 NOVEMBER 19 1992 Second Cup gets Champions. the support of over 3000 staff and students few weeks. The current total of Lianne Jewitt by has signatures on both petitions The Second Cup, favoured reached over 3000. and among students, faculty, When asked to comment on staff alike is scheduled to be re- the petitions, Rayner said that he as of December 11, 1992; placed "hasn't seen the petitions." Rayner a petition is being circulated in also said that "we'll consider the or them response to this aspects action. (the petitions)". Director of Exactly what Personnel and The current number will be consider- Administrative ed is uncertain, as Services, Earl Rayner clearly of on signatures states Rayner, said the that the Second reason for re- Cup was of the given a "one placement both petitions has year Second Cup is trial basis", and that it is "costing the decision for their dismissal us too much reached over 3000. "made money to havfc it was this there." Rayner past September." The Lady Soccer Hanks wwn—i the iliwnto, McMaater, St. Mary's, and McQIII, added, "the return It was the Second title. and return to Laurlor aHh the National Cluaipto—tUp - ■ I D<lfc gTOarGO If®** VVGRMfI to the university is hardly cover- Cup's one year anniversary on ing our costs." campus. Rayner has not mentioned WLU student confesses Quite clearly, coffee and hot what will be the replacing popu- chocolate drinkers, and cookie lar coffee cart, but concerned coffee drinkers fear it to in bomb threat campus and muffin eaters' main concern calling will be a university-run establish- with the pending absence of the ment Second Cup is the lack of quality "I think it's terrorism, and certainly deserving of Dean of Student's Pat Brethour secretary, that awaits if a university run ser- by charges," said Fred Nichols, Dean of Students.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Learned Sustainability Strategy Environmental Scan & Engagement Summary
    What We Learned Sustainability Strategy Environmental Scan & Engagement Summary 3/13/2017 The University of Winnipeg Campus Sustainability Office Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Looking Back ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sustainable Campuses for the Anthropocene ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 An Updated Vision ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Goal 1: Exceed Canada’s Commitments Under the Paris Accord....................................................................................................................... 13 Goal 2: Cultivate Principled Relationships with People On and Off Campus and with Ecosystems Near and Far ................................................ 17 Goal 3: Develop and Deliver Curriculum, Student Services, and Programming that Deepen Student Knowledge about Sustainability and that Helps Motivate Thoughtful Leadership and Action ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Selected Comparison Groups Report
    Cape Breton University Selected Comparison Groups August 2011 Reviewing Your NSSE 2011 Selected Comparison Groups Report The NSSE Institutional Report displays results for each institution alongside three comparison groups which are customizable. In June, your institution was invited to select comparison groups via the "Report Form" on the Institution Interface. This report summarizes how your comparison groups were selected, and lists the institutions within them. NSSE comparison groups may be customized in several ways. Contacts may identify specific institutions from the list of all current-year NSSE participants, compose the group using institutional characteristics, or begin with institutional characteristics, then add or remove specific institutions to refine the comparison group. If an institution does not customize a comparison group, NSSE provides default groups which provide relevant comparisons for most institutions. The default groups are: Comparison Group 1 - For institutions not in a NSSE consortium, this group contains current-year institutions in the same geographic region and sector (public/private). For consortium institutions, it contains results for the other consortium members. Comparison Group 2 - All other current-year U.S. NSSE institutions sharing your institution's Basic Carnegie Classification. Comparison Group 3 - All other current-year U.S. NSSE institutions (Canadian participants are also included in this group for Canadian institutions). The selected comparison group locations in the institutional reports
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENT ASSOCIATIONS and ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20
    Student Associations and Alumni Relations 20.1 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS 20.2 GRADUATE STUDENTS 20.3 ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20 101 STUDENT ASSOCIATIONS AND ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20 20.1 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS The Concordia Student Union (CSU) represents all undergraduate students, both full‑time and part‑time. Besides organizing many events and activities, the CSU ensures student representation on University decision‑making bodies, both those that legislate on academic and administrative matters and those concerned with the cultural and social life of the community. There are student members of the Board of Governors, Senate, the Faculty Councils, and the Concordia Council on Student Life, which is directly concerned with all issues pertaining to student life including the provision of student services. The CSU also offers services for its members such as a Housing and Job Bank, and Advocacy and Legal Information Services. There is a CSU office on each campus. The Sir George Williams office is in Room H 711 of the Henry F. Hall Building. The Loyola office is in the CC Building, Room 426. CSU’s telephone number is 514‑848‑2424, ext. 7474; email: [email protected]; website: csu. qc.ca. Powers and responsibilities are divided between three bodies: the Executive, the Council of Representatives, and the Judicial Board. The Executive is headed by an elected president. The Council of Representatives consists of students elected from the undergraduate student population with seats reserved for the four Faculties and Independent students. The Judicial Board is an appointed body charged with assuring the constitutionality of any new legislation or resolution of conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Easton Mccarney Memorial Lectures Fonds (RG-18.2)
    Finding Aid - Wilfrid Laurier University Faculty of Social Work - Easton McCarney Memorial Lectures fonds (RG-18.2) Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Printed: May 16, 2018 Language of description: English Wilfrid Laurier University Faculty of Social Work - Easton McCarney Memorial Lectures fonds Table of contents Summary information ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative history / Biographical sketch .................................................................................................. 3 Scope and content ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Access points ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Series descriptions ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1, 1974 - Reuben C. Baetz, November 4, 1974 ........................................................................................... 4 2, 1975 - Jorge Rosner, November 6, 1975 ................................................................................................. 4 3, 1976 - Alan C. Beckman, November 4, 1976 ......................................................................................... 4 4, 1977 - Arnold Edinborough and
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy and Our Present
    ACTUALITIES: PHILOSOPHY AND OUR PRESENT an Ottawa-wide interdisciplinary student conference co-organized by the uOttawa Graduate Philosophy Student Association, Saint Paul University, the Carleton University Philosophy Society and the Dominican University College Student Association, with the assistance of the uOttawa Undergraduate Philosophy Student Association 1st – 4th March 2018 Keynote Speakers: Iva Apostolova (Dominican University College) Wes Furlotte (Dominican University College) Matthew R. McLennan (Saint Paul University) Douglas Moggach (University of Ottawa) Julie Paquette (Saint Paul University) Devin Zane Shaw (Carleton University) Zoe Todd (Carleton University) NOTE: Apart from the presentations at Saint Paul University on 1st March, all keynote presentations are 45 minutes long, followed by a 15-minute discussion period; and all student presentations are 30 minutes long, followed by a 15-minute discussion period as well. Thursday, 1st March (Saint Paul University; Room 117, Guigues Hall) « (Re)penser la société de contrôle » (Université Saint-Paul) 6:00 p.m. Julie Paquette, ‘De la société disciplinaire, à la société de contrôle, à la société algorithmique: le nouvel avatar’ (20 mins + 10 mins discussion) 6:30 p.m. Laurence Pelchat-Labelle, ‘Deleuze et la non-communication: propédeutique à la désobéissance civile électronique’ (20 mins) Marie-Hélène Casimiro, ‘Résilience face à la société de contrôle: Communauté LGBTQ+ et nouveaux médias’ (20 mins) Geneviève Ratelle, ‘Immobilisme et biopolitique: perspectives critiques sur le système pénal canadien’ (20 mins) 7:30 p.m. EXTENDED DISCUSSION PERIOD 7:50 p.m. PAUSE 8:00 p.m. Martin Samson, ‘Changements climatique, Anthropocène et éco-pouvoir: Pour une critique réalist-dialectique de la société de contrôle à l’aune de la crise écologique’ (20 mins + 10 mins discussion) 8:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Next- Generation University President’S Report 2019
    NEXT- GENERATION UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 CREATIVE. URBAN. BOLD. ENGAGED. BOLDLY ADVANCING 2 NEXT-GEN EDUCATION This 2019 President’s Report tries to capture some of the incredible progress our community has made over the past year. You will read about successes that signal our place as one of Quebec and Canada’s major universities. As I near the end of my mandate as Concordia’s president, I am proud of our achievements and excited about the university’s future. We have really come into our own. 3 Enjoy the read! Alan Shepard MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT FROM MESSAGE President ABOUT CONCORDIA oncordia University, located in the vibrant and multicultural city of Montreal, is among the top-ranked C universities worldwide founded within the last 50 years and among the largest urban universities in Canada. Concordia prepares more than 50,000 students for a world of challenges and opportunities. As a next-generation university, Concordia strives to be forward-looking, agile and responsive, while remaining deeply rooted in the community and globally networked. Our nine strategic directions exemplify a bold, daring, innovative and transformative approach to university education and research. Our more than 2,300 faculty and researchers collaborate with other thinkers, Montreal-based companies and international organizations. concordia.ca/about CONCORDIA AT A GLANCE* 11th largest university in Canada, 83% of final-year undergraduate students fourth largest in Quebec satisfied or very satisfied with the overall quality of their Concordia
    [Show full text]
  • Life Sentence: Stories from Four Decades of Court Reporting -- Or, How I Fell out of Love with the Canadian Justice System (Especially Judges) Online
    EZtR6 [Read free ebook] Life Sentence: Stories from Four Decades of Court Reporting -- or, How I Fell Out of Love with the Canadian Justice System (Especially Judges) Online [EZtR6.ebook] Life Sentence: Stories from Four Decades of Court Reporting -- or, How I Fell Out of Love with the Canadian Justice System (Especially Judges) Pdf Free Christie Blatchford ePub | *DOC | audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #2415448 in Books 2016-09-20 2016-09-20Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.40 x 1.30 x 6.30l, .0 #File Name: 0385667973384 pages | File size: 46.Mb Christie Blatchford : Life Sentence: Stories from Four Decades of Court Reporting -- or, How I Fell Out of Love with the Canadian Justice System (Especially Judges) before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Life Sentence: Stories from Four Decades of Court Reporting -- or, How I Fell Out of Love with the Canadian Justice System (Especially Judges): 0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. I was disappointed that the book didn't deal with the issues around ...By billfernWell written book. It describes the issues with the Canadian justice system and draws a lot of focus on the judge selection process. A lot was written about the Bernardo Holmolka trials and the outcome. Maybe too much. But maybe needed. I was disappointed that the book didn't deal with the issues around the disappearance of women in Canada and some of the Supreme Court decisions versus the Harper McKay government repression of women in the lower classes of society.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR TURN ACTION PLAN 23 Prevention 26 Support 28 Advocacy 30 the BEGINNING of a MOVEMENT 31 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 32 SOURCES CITED 33 APPENDIX a 35 APPENDIX B 38
    A National, Student-Led Action Plan to End Campus Sexual Violence MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRS 3 IT’S OUR TURN 5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 8 THE ISSUE 12 What is Sexual Violence? 13 Impacts of Sexual Violence 14 Intersectionality and Sexual Violence 15 Rape Culture on Canadian Campuses 16 CAMPUS SEXUAL VIOLENCE POLICIES 17 THE OUR TURN ACTION PLAN 23 Prevention 26 Support 28 Advocacy 30 THE BEGINNING OF A MOVEMENT 31 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 32 SOURCES CITED 33 APPENDIX A 35 APPENDIX B 38 PLEASE CITE AS Salvino, Caitlin, Kelsey Gilchrist, and Jade Cooligan-Pang. ‘OurTurn: A National Action Plan to End Campus Sexual Violence’. Montreal, QC: Student’s Society of McGill University, 2017. A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRS This movement The Board passed the policy anyway. We continued to advocate for reforms to the started with a Sexual Violence Policy in the weeks and months “ following the vote. We went to meetings. We wrote a second open letter, which included exten- single letter. sive research on other campus sexual violence policies and received more support than the first When Carleton University released the first draft one. We put up banners and held several rallies. of the Carleton University Sexual Violence Policy However, members of our university administra- in October 2016, a few of us got together and tion continued to refuse to reopen the policy or drafted an open letter suggesting reforms. These take action to work with students to address sexu- were common sense reforms—backed up by re- al violence on our campus. Furthermore, the pro- search—that would provide better protections for vincial government who mandated the creation of survivors of sexual violence pursuing a complaint these policies was absent, lacking any meaningful process.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalhousie Student Union
    FEATURE -t Fine arts on cutting block?, p.7. ARTS -t Oh what a feeling! Dancing on the ceiling!, p.8-9. SPORTS ---+ Following the bouncing aze ball to the AUAAs, p.l2. Vol. 128,!\;o. 19 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY, HALIFAX, N.S. Thursday, February-29, 1996 Two more SUB employees lose jobs BY DANIEL CLARK position. Restructuring, not job performance, given as explanation The students hired will be ini­ Two more full-time employees tially trained by Pat Martin, head have been let go from their duties can handle it." is directing the search for an Ex­ a co-operative experience.·· of technical services. in the Student Union Building The plan of the restructuring ecutive Administrator, but once Leech agreed. "This man knows everything (SUB). is to reduce the full-time staff to that is done, we will be ready for "This really a great opportu­ about this building," said Leech. This time. Joan Bradley, SUB a bare minimum of six core posi­ any change." nity for the students." he said. "He trained both Joan and Ronnie. Reservations, and Ronald Farrell, tions. The former position of Gen­ "I have always been a big sup­ "Not only to get a job. but also to and they couldn't be in better SUB Night Manager. were released eral Manager has been split porter of student jobs," said Cox. receive valuable management ex­ hands." in the name of restructuring. between two positions: Executive "I want to put a student in every perience." Cox regrets that Farrell and Both were in their first year of Administrator and Director of possible student union position.
    [Show full text]
  • Iva Apostolova Faculty of Philosophy, Dominican University College 96 Empress Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G3 (613) 233 5696, Ext. 337 [email protected]
    Iva Apostolova Faculty of Philosophy, Dominican University College 96 Empress Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G3 (613) 233 5696, ext. 337 [email protected] Current title: Associate Professor Current Position: Vice-President Academic Affairs and Registrar, Dominican University College Citizenship: Canadian Area of Specialization: Analytic Philosophy (with focus on Bertrand Russell), Epistemology, Critical Analysis Area of Competence: Feminist Philosophy (also proto-feminist thinkers from 17th -19th Century), Russian Philosophy, Applied Ethics, Philosophy of Education Education Ph.D. in Philosophy University of Ottawa Thesis: “Sensation, Memory and Imagination in Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy 1910-1926" (see the attached thesis abstract) Advisor: Dr. Paul Forster, University of Ottawa External Advisor: Dr. Nicholas Griffin, McMaster University MA in Philosophy Sofia University Thesis: “The Problem of Skepticism in David Hume’s Philosophy in the Light of the Problem of Miracles” Advisor: Dr. Dimitar Denkov, Sofia University Bachelor’s in Philosophy Sofia University Specialization in Philosophy for Children program Sofia University 1 | P a g e National Lycée for Ancient Languages and Civilizations, Sofia. Specialization: literature, graduated with a dissertation, “Garcia Marquez: Work beyond the Myth.” Awards and Achievements • Admission Scholarship, University of Ottawa • Department of Philosophy Summer Research Scholarship (competitive scholarship), University of Ottawa • Dean’s list, Sofia University Teaching Experience Dominican University
    [Show full text]
  • Knights of Columbus' Good Works Assist Parish and Community
    September 2012 Knights of Columbus’ good works assist parish and community The local councils of the Knights of Columbus (KofC) remain vigilant in providing assistance to those in need while adhering to their Roman Catholic beliefs that are the driving force behind the organization as it continues to grow. “I always recognized it as a great service group within the church, which ties faith to service and service to faith,” says Jack Schreader, a member since 2005 and Grand Knight of the KofC, Bishop N.Z. Lorrain Council 1531 of Pembroke. “It’s a great group of guys.” On October 2, 1881, Father Michael J. McGivney called together a group of men to a church basement in New Haven, Connecticut. At that gathering, a pledge was made to form a fraternal order based on their devotion to their country, families and faith. A life insurance program was established by the founders to provide for widows and orphans of deceased members, which still exists to this day. Those wishing to join the KofC must be 18 years of age and be practicing Roman Catholics in union with the Holy See. Prospective applicants must accept the teaching authority of the Catholic Church on matters of faith and morals, strive to live in accordance with the Our Lady of Guadalupe celebration on January 26, 2012, featuring the Icon and the Knights of Columbus precepts of the Church, and be in good standing in the newly formed choir. Catholic Church. Not unlike the challenges the diocese currently faces in engaging youth to reconnect with their faith, so, recently, a new gathering of Knights is being established “I have a lot of family roots in that area,” explains too, are the KofC encountering hurdles in recruiting in Douglas via St.
    [Show full text]