In Memory of Bruce Mcewen: a Gentle Giant of Neuroscience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Memory of Bruce Mcewen: a Gentle Giant of Neuroscience obituary In memory of Bruce McEwen: a gentle giant of neuroscience On 2 January 2020, the neuroscience community lost not only a pioneering fgure, but also a generous and infuential thought leader. Bruce Sherman McEwen, head of the Harold and Margaret Milliken Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology at the Rockefeller University, passed away at age 81, following a short illness. A member of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Medicine and American Academy of Arts & Sciences, and former president of the Society for Neuroscience, Bruce will be remembered for his profound scientifc impact, measured not only by output of papers, but also by the large family of neuroscientists he trained over a career spanning nearly six decades. Above all, Bruce will be remembered for his generosity, kindness, gentleness of soul, and for being an extraordinary mentor. orn 17 January 1938, Bruce obtained by which we understand how adverse life a Bachelor’s of Science in chemistry events impact physical and mental health. Bfrom Oberlin College, followed by In addition to his work on stress, Bruce a PhD in cell biology from Rockefeller was a pioneer in understanding how gonadal University in 1964. Following a short steroids act in the brain. His early work time in Sweden furthering his training, helped to map brain estrogen receptors, Bruce returned to the US and founded and his lab discovered that reproductive the Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology in hormones could influence structural 1966. From his first paper in 1959 to the plasticity of dendrites and synapses. time of his death, Bruce published over Bruce’s work in this area contributed to 1,000 scientific articles (with over 130,000 the understanding of sex differences and citations) on topics ranging from molecular was foundational for the now-widespread mechanisms of steroid action in the brain to recognition of the need to consider sex as the health impacts of early-life adversity. The a biological variable in neuroscience and breadth of his work and interests led Bruce beyond. to describe himself later in his career as a In both his personal and professional life, “molecular sociologist.” Bruce was a family man. He was an adoring While the effect of stress hormones husband, father and grandfather. Bruce’s on the brain is taken for granted now, it scientific family came to lovingly refer to was Bruce’s 1968 paper in Nature that first each other as the ‘McEwenites’, brought demonstrated receptors for the adrenal together across generations and research stress steroid, corticosterone, in the fields by Bruce’s generous mentorship. Bruce hippocampus. This seminal finding led to frequently adopted neuroscientists from recognition that steroid hormones have a outside his lab into this scientific family, direct impact on neural function. Over the treating all to his scientific and personal Credit: Tiffany Lee subsequent five decades, Bruce continued generosity. Without regard for his own to lead the field in understanding the professional stature, Bruce never viewed his neurobiology of stress. Work by his lab, and trainees as competition, instead supporting by his myriad of trainees, revealed neural decline. Work from Bruce’s lab also set the everyone to take their ideas and flourish and plasticity influenced by stressful experience stage for how we now understand stress to go on to do great things independently. It and created a template for understanding be a contributing factor in the development is rare to find an individual who can claim how these alterations could influence of chronic inflammatory and metabolic such a long and wide lineage of successful behavior, from affect to cognition. His diseases. This aspect of Bruce’s work scientific offspring. work showing stress-induced structural highlighted reciprocal relationships between While this obituary might attempt plasticity of dendrites and regulation of the brain and body as being critical to both to spell out a small fraction of his adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus susceptibility and resilience to stress. achievements, Bruce rarely, if ever, revealed mechanisms by which stress Bruce was a key figure in developing discussed his own accomplishments, exposure remodels corticolimbic circuits the concept of ‘allostatic load’, which posits legacy or impact in science. Bruce did what and influences susceptibility to psychiatric that physiological adaptation to persistent he did for the generation of knowledge illnesses. Bruce also studied how stress at or repeated challenges imparts a cost in the and the advancement of society, not for different life stages could have different form of cumulative wear and tear on the accolades. He had an infectious energy and effects, with early-life stress leaving a body. This conceptualization of the health optimism. Whether it came in an hours- lasting impact on the developing brain, impacts of stress had an unquestionable long discussion about a finding in the lab while aging increased vulnerability to impact on the field of stress biology and still or a comprehensive review article, Bruce stress, contributing to accelerated cognitive represents the primary theoretical model appreciated any advance and celebrated NATURE NEUROSCIENCE | VOL 23 | APRIL 2020 | 473–474 | www.nature.com/natureneuroscience 473 obituary every success. He was patient and generous scientific discovery. Bruce’s goal was to bring 1Departments of Cell Biology and Anatomy, and gave his time and energy to everyone humanity into science and use knowledge, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and and anyone. One was just as likely to and compassion, to improve the human Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of see him talking to an undergraduate condition. We, as authors, are a few of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2Department student at their poster as to see him rubbing the fortunate group of scientists who had of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for shoulders with Nobel laureates or celebrities. the privilege to have trained with and Neuroendocrine Studies, University of Massachusetts In his actions, Bruce reminded us that, learned from Bruce and to be directly Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA. 3Department of ultimately, we are all the same and it is by influenced by his intellect, generosity and Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, working together that we can achieve great optimism. However, we all, scientists and Leiden, Te Netherlands. 4Centre for Studies on things in science. non-scientists alike, would benefit from Human Stress, Institut Universitaire en Santé Bruce McEwen’s passing will have a adopting the gentle demeanor, modesty Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada. resounding impact on the neuroscience and generosity that Bruce exhibited to 5Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern community and will not be easy to recover everyone he met. ❐ University, Evanston, IL, USA. from. His legacy will be carried on by the ✉e-mail: [email protected] hundreds of McEwenites and the thousands Matthew N. Hill1 ✉ , Ilia N. Karatsoreos 2, more influenced by his work who will E. Ron de Kloet3, Sonia Lupien4 and Published online: 23 March 2020 continue to advance knowledge and Catherine S. Woolley5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0613-y 474 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE | VOL 23 | APRIL 2020 | 473–474 | www.nature.com/natureneuroscience.
Recommended publications
  • Keynote Address Stress, Sex and the Hippocampus
    You are here: Home > research > 12th Research Day > Keynote Speaker ABSTRACT: KEYNOTE ADDRESS STRESS, SEX AND THE HIPPOCAMPUS: FROM SERENDIPITY TO CLINICAL RELEVANCE Bruce S. McEwen, PhD Lab Neuroendocrinology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY The hippocampal formation, which expresses high levels of adrenal steroid receptors, is a plastic brain structure that is important for certain types of learning and memory. It is also vulnerable to insults such as stroke, seizures and head trauma. The hippocampus is also sensitive and vulnerable to the effects of stress and stress hormones and it is responsive to the actions of sex hormones as well, both during development and adult life. Stress and sex hormones regulate 3 types of structural plasticity in the adult hippocampus: synaptogenesis, reorganization of dendrites, and neurogenesis in the dendrite gyrus. Developmentally-programmed sex differences are also seen in the hippocampus. Suppression of dentate gyrus neurogenesis and atrophy of dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons are produced by chronic psychosocial stress, involving the actions of adrenal steroids acting in concert with excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters. As far as we can tell, these changes are reversible as long as stress is terminated after a number of weeks. However, there are also reports that much longer durations of psychosocial stress leads to permanent loss of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. In the human hippocampus, MRI studies along with neuropsychological testing have revealed memory impairment and atrophy of the whole human hippocampus in some individuals as they age. This is reminiscent of individual differences in aging in rodents, which appear to reflect life-long patterns of stress hormone reactivity that are developmentally programmed, although a developmental influence upon human individual differences is only a matter of speculation.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropsychology of Childhood Epilepsy Advances in Behavioral Biology
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY OF CHILDHOOD EPILEPSY ADVANCES IN BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY Editorial Board Jan Bures Institute of Physiology, Prague, Czech Republic Irwin Kopin National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland Bruce McEwen Rockefeller University, New York, New York Karl Pribram Radford University, Radford, Virginia Jay Rosenblatt Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey Lawrence Weiskranz University of Oxford, Oxford, England Recent Volumes in This Series Volume 37 KINDLING 4 Edited by Juhn A. Wada Volume 38A BASIC, CLINICAL, AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF ALZHEIMER’S AND PARKINSON’S DISEASES, Volume 1 Edited by Toshiharu Nagatsu, Abraham Fisher, and Mitsuo Yoshida Volume 38B BASIC, CLINICAL, AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF ALZHEIMER’S AND PARKINSON’S DISEASES, Volume 2 Edited by Toshiharu Nagatsu, Abraham Fisher, and Mitsuo Yoshida Volume 39 THE BASAL GANGLIA III Edited by Giorgio Bernardi, Malcolm B. Carpenter, Gaetano Di Chiara, Micaela Morelli, and Paolo Stanzione Volume 40 TREATMENT OF DEMENTIAS: A New Generation of Progress Edited by Edwin M. Meyer, James W. Simpkins, Jyunji Yamamoto, and Fulton T. Crews Volume 41 THE BASAL GANGLIA IV: New Ideas and Data on Structure and Function Edited by Gérard Percheron, John S. McKenzie, and Jean Féger Volume 42 CALLOSAL AGENESIS: A Natural Split Brain? Edited by Maryse Lassonde and Malcolm A. Jeeves Volume 43 NEUROTRANSMITTERS IN THE HUMAN BRAIN Edited by David J. Tracey, George Paxinos, and Jonathan Stone Volume 44 ALZHEIMER’S AND PARKINSON’S DISEASES: Recent Developments Edited by Israel Hanin, Mitsuo Yoshia, and Abraham Fisher Volume 45 EPILEPSY AND THE CORPUS CALLOSUM 2 Edited by Alexander G. Reeves and David W. Roberts Volume 46 BIOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE BLOOD–BRAIN BARRIER: Transport, Cellular Interactions, and Brain Pathologies Edited by Pierre-Olivier Couraud and Daniel Scherman Volume 47 THE BASAL GANGLIA IV Edited by Chihoto Ohye, Minoru Kimura, and John S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ask the Experts Forum #5: Your Position in Society
    ASK THE EXPERTS FORUM #5: YOUR POSITION IN SOCIETY Nancy Adler, Bruce McEwen, and Peter Schnall address chronic stress, the wealth-health gradient, unemployment, and why women live longer than men. QUESTION #1: If wealth determines health, then why do women – who are routinely paid less than men – live longer? NANCY ADLER: First, we should note that women live longer than men but have higher rates of a number of chronic diseases. So if you actually look at what’s called “quality-adjusted life expectancy,” the gap isn’t as great. But why do women live longer than men? I think the short answer is there appear to be some biological advantages that women have, particularly estrogen, which protects women against cardiovascular disease, the biggest single cause of death in the United States. So pre-menopausally, women are protected and it shifts the mortality from heart disease a number of years. We also see a female biological advantage even at birth. Female fetuses survive at greater rates than do male fetuses, particularly if the pregnant woman is stressed, suggesting that female fetuses may have a little bit of a biological advantage. But it’s also important to think about some related issues. Wealth isn’t the only social determinant of health. If you stuff your pockets with money, it doesn’t make you healthier. It’s what money gets you, along with other social resources, that matters. And women have other resources. Education is an important determinant of health, and women are graduating from high school and from colleges at somewhat greater rates than men.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Animal Neuropsychology Session II
    Third Annual Neuropsychology Research Day September 16, 2005 9:00-9:10 AM Welcome Joshua Brumberg, Ph.D., Organizer and Founder Neuropsychology Research Day Session I: Basic Animal Neuropsychology Moderator: 9:10-9:25 Morphological Characterization of Layer VI: Effect of Sensory Deprivation Eric Chen (Brumberg Lab) 9:25-9:40 VEGF and Seizures Jamee Nicoletti (Croll Lab) 9:40-9:55 Blockade of VTA Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Disrupts Acquisition of a Food Rewarded Lever Pressing Task Ruth Sharf (Ranaldi Lab) 9:55-10:10 Inbred Mouse Strain Survey of Sucrose Intake Sarah Lewis (Bodnar Lab) 10:10-10:25 Opiods and Addiction Gad Klein (Kest Lab) 10:25-10:45 Questions 10:45-11:00 Coffee Break (put up posters) Session II: Basic Human Neuropsychology Moderator: 11:05-11:20 The Neural Correlates of Nodal Function During Equivalence Class Formation Lanny Fields, Ph.D. 11:20-11:35 Emotional Modulation of Attention: An Event Related Potential Study Tracy Dennis-Tiwary (Hunter College) 11:35-11:50 Mechanisms Selective for 3-D Shapes Revealed By Adaptation to Real and Illusory Tilts Andrea Li, Ph.D. 11:50-12:00 PM Questions Session III: Poster Session 12:00-1:00 PM Lunch/Poster Session Session IV: Keynote Speaker 1:00-2:30 Words of Welcome: Thomas C. Strekas, Ph.D. Dean Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Queens College, CUNY Introduction of Keynote Speaker: Joshua Brumberg, Ph.D. Program Head, Neuropsychology Ph.D. Subprogram Department of Psychology, Queens College, CUNY Keynote Speaker: Bruce McEwen, Ph.D. Alfred E. Mirsky Professor and Head of the Harold and Margaret Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology The Rockefeller University Stress and the Mind-Body Connection: Lessons from Neuroendocrinology 2:30-2:35 Break Session V: Clinical Neuropsychology Moderator: Peter Sturmey, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Golden
    It’s A Golden Age Miracles happen, and emotional plasticity may be one of them. A few years ago, I met with a warm, fatherly psychiatrist to explain the science and methods of EBT. During our conversation, there came a moment when words failed me. I suggested that he try one of the tools, and he demurred, so I volunteered to demonstrate the technique. I had not been aware of how stressed I was at the time – that I feared that I would never get this method out and would go to my grave with the tools still inside me. However, in the warm womb of his comfy office, I launched into using a tool. I fired up anger that sported a few expletives, made a brief pass through sadness with tears sparkling in my eyes, next touched on fear, and then on guilt. At that point, the bottom of my reptilian brain opened up. I had unlocked a previously unconscious, completely unreasonable expectation that had taken up residence in my brain. Perfect! Moments later, I had switched that expectation to a reasonable one of my choosing, and a burst of dopamine, oxytocin, and endorphins came over me. I was in joy! All of this had taken less than four minutes. He sat quietly. I had no idea what he would say. Then he gazed straight into my eyes and said, “Nothing in my 40 years of psychiatry has prepared me to explain what I just observed.” Through his eyes, my use of the tools must have seemed strange in two ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Impact of Stress- a Comparison Between a Factor
    Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 2011 Analyzing the Impact of Stress: A Comparison Between a Factor Analytic and a Composite Measurement of Allostatic Load J.G. Buckwalter, A. Rizzo, B.S. John L. Finlay, A. Wong, E. Chin, J. Wellman, Institute for C reative Technologies S. Smolinski Playa Vista, C A Fuller Graduate School of Psychology {jgbuckwalter, rizzo, bjohn} @ict.usc.edu Pasadena, C A {lisafinlay, andrew wong, estherchin, johnathanweljlom@afnu,l lseter.pehdaun iesmolinski} @fuller.edu T. E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, C A [email protected] A BST R A C T Stress is possibly the hallmark characteristic of the current conflicts confronting the United States. Extended and repeated deployments require the ability on the part of war-fighters to effectively process stress in ways never before routinely encountered. Stress is well defined as a series of psychological and physiological processes that occur in response to a stressor, or the perception of stress. The physiological response to stress follows an identified path, a robust neuroendocrine response leads to responses in the cardiovascular, metabolic, renal, inflammatory and LPPXQHV\VWHPV$IWHUDVWUHVVUHVSRQVHWKHERG\¶VQDWXUDOWHQGHQF\LVWRUHWXUQWRDVWHDG\VWDWHDSURFHVVFDOOHG allostasis. If the body is not effective in returning to homeostasis, or if the environment is such that stress is repeated, markers of dysfunction may be apparent in the physiological systems that respond to stress. A method of measuring multiple biomarkers of stress responsive systems and determining who shows consistent evidence of dysfunction was developed by Bruce McEwen and labeled allostatic load (AL). AL is most frequently measured by developing a level of risk for each biomarker and obtaining an AL score for the number of biomarkers the criterion for risk is met.
    [Show full text]
  • Sparking Change Science Lights the Way PAGE 28
    THE SOCIAL DYNAMICS OF THE 2019 A DOCTORAL STUDENT'S ENVIRONMENTALISM APS YEAR IN REVIEW SUMMER IN TECH ObserverVOL. 33, NO. 1 JANUARY 2020 Sparking Change Science lights the way PAGE 28 a publication of www.psychologicalscience.org/observer Observer ISSN: 1050-4672 Published 10 times per year by the Association for Psychological Science, the © 2020 Association for Psychological Science Federal ID Number: 73-1345573 Observer educates and informs the Association on matters affecting the research, All rights reserved. academic, and applied disciplines of psychology; promotes the scientific values of PUBLISHER Sarah Brookhart APS Members; reports and comments on issues of international interest to the EXECUTIVE EDITOR Melissa Welch-Ross EDITOR Leah Thayer psychological scientist community; and provides a vehicle for the dissemination DESIGN AND PRODUCTION EDITOR Raquel Herrera Fernandes of information on APS. EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Kim Armstrong SENIOR GRAPHIC DESIGNER Candy Cruz REPRINT PERMISSION: Photo copying OBSERVER FORUM:The Observer Observer content for classroom use is welcomes your comments and feedback. APS Board of Directors permitted at no charge. Students may not For consideration in the Observer Forum, PRESIDENT be charged more than the actual cost of letters should be sent to apsobserver@ Lisa Feldman Barrett – Northeastern University producing the photocopy. Source citation psychologicalscience.org. Unless oth- PRESIDENT-ELECT must indicate that the materials are from the erwise indicated, all correspondence Shinobu Kitayama – University of Michigan Observer, a publication of the Association for received will be considered for publica- IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Psychological Science. tion. The Observer does not guarantee Barbara Tversky – Teachers College, Columbia University and publication and reserves the right to edit APS does not assist in copyright requests Stanford University all content for length and style.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Animal Welfare Concept Based on Allostasis ⁎ S
    Physiology & Behavior 92 (2007) 422–428 Review A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis ⁎ S. Mechiel Korte a,b,c, , Berend Olivier a,b, Jaap M. Koolhaas d a Department of Psychopharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, The Netherlands b Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, The Netherlands c Animal Science Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Lelystad, The Netherlands d Department of Animal Physiology, Groningen University, Haren, The Netherlands Received 17 July 2006; received in revised form 27 September 2006; accepted 20 October 2006 Abstract Animal welfare is an increasing issue of public concern and debate. As a result, many countries are reconsidering the way animal welfare is embedded in the legislation and rules for housing and care of animals. This requires general agreement of what animal welfare is. Unfortunately, the current science of animal welfare is less scientific than what has been claimed. In our view, it is overly guided by anthropocentric thinking about how animals ought to be handled and neglects the latest concept of physiology: ‘The Allostasis Concept’. Allostasis, which means stability through change, has the potential to replace homeostasis as the core model of physiological regulation. Not constancy or freedoms, but capacity to change is crucial to good physical and mental health and good animal welfare. Therefore, not homeostasis but allostasis is at the basis of our new animal welfare concept. This paper is aimed at a broader scientific discussion of animal welfare that includes knowledge from the latest scientific developments in neurobiology and behavioral physiology, and generates views that are extremely relevant for the animal welfare discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Mcewen Summary Draft
    GCPH Seminar Series 3 SUMMARY PAPER 3 ‘Of Molecules and Mind: Stress, the Individual and the Social Environment’ Prof Bruce McEwen, Alfred E Minksy Professor / Head of the Harold and Margaret Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Rockefeller University, New York, Overview: This wide ranging lecture explored the relationships between conditions and behaviours of everyday life and the biological and psychological (neuro-endocrine) pathways through which the stresses of everyday life are related to mortality and morbidity. In addition to looking at these from an individual perspective, the lecture also examined the associations which exist between socioeconomic inequality and health. Key ideas: • Allostatic load: The extent to which the body must change in order to maintain stability under stress. • Stressed out: A feeling of being chronically under stress and overwhelmed by everyday events. • Telomere: The ends of linear chromosomes that are required for replication and stability; the tip (or end) of a chromosome. • Allele: Alternative form of a gene; one of the different forms of a gene that can exist at a single locus. • Cytokines: Any of several regulatory proteins that are released by cells of the immune system and act as intercellular mediators in the generation of an immune response. • Dendrites: The branching process of a neuron that conducts impulses toward the cell. A single nerve may possess many dendrites. • Sympathetic: Part of the autonomic nervous system functioning in opposition to the parasympathetic system, as in stimulating heartbeat, dilating the pupil of the eye, etc. • Parasympathetic: Part of the autonomic nervous system functioning in opposition to the sympathetic system, as in inhibiting heartbeat, contracting the pupil of the eye, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Sherman Mcewen
    BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE-131211-05_McEwen.indd 190 16/04/14 5:22 PM Bruce Sherman McEwen BORN: Ft. Collins, CO January 17, 1938 EDUCATION: University High School, Ann Arbor, MI (1955) Oberlin College, AB Summa Cum Laude in Chemistry (1959) Rockefeller University, PhD (1964) APPOINTMENTS: United States Public Health Service Postdoctoral Fellow, Institute of Neurobiology, Goteborg, Sweden (1964–1965) Assistant Professor, Dept. of Zoology, University of Minnesota (Jan.–June, 1966) Assistant Professor, Rockefeller University (1966–1971); Associate Professor (1971–1973); Associate Professor with tenure (1973–1981); Professor (1981–present) Alfred E. Mirsky Professor, Head, Harold and Margaret Milliken Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology (1999–present) Associate Dean for Graduate and Postgraduate Studies, Rockefeller University, (1985–1991); Dean (1991–1993) Faculty Chair, Science Outreach Program, Women and Science and Parents and Science Programs, Rockefeller University HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Fellow of American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1994) MERIT Award, National Institute of Mental Health, 1994 and Jacob Javits Award, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (1995) Member, National Academy of Sciences (1997) Fellow of the New York Academy of Sciences (1998) Member, Institute of Medicine (1998) Honorary Sc.D. degree: Oberlin College (2000) President’s Award, American Psychosomatic Society (2001) Dale Medal, British Endocrine Society (2001) Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions, American Psychological Association (2003) Honorary Sc.D. degree, University of Michigan (2005) Karl Spencer Lashley Award, American Philosophical Society (2005) Pat Goldman Rakic Award, National Association for Research on Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders (2005) Pasarow Foundation Neuropsychiatry Award (2006) Segerfalk Award, University of Lund, Sweden (2007) Gold Medal, Society of Biological Psychiatry (2009) Ipsen Fondation, Neuroplasticity Prize, shared with Tom Insel and Donald Pfaff (2010) Edward M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Goal Orientation of Attention, Learning, and Metacognitive Awareness
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-2010 The Effect of goal orientation of attention, learning, and metacognitive awareness Ordene V. Edwards University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Educational Psychology Commons Repository Citation Edwards, Ordene V., "The Effect of goal orientation of attention, learning, and metacognitive awareness" (2010). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1456884 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF GOAL ORIENTATION ON ATTENTION, LEARNING, AND METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS by Ordene V. Edwards Bachelor of Arts Fort Valley State University 2003 Master of Science University of Nevada Las Vegas 2006 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Psychology Department of Educational Psychology College of Education Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2010 THE GRADUATE COLLEGE We recommend the dissertation prepared under our supervision by Ordene V Edwards entitled The Effect of Goal Orientation of Attention, Learning, and Metacognitive Awareness be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Psychology Ralph E.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter H. Huang Harold E. Kohn Chair Professor of Law James Beasley
    Emotional Impact Analysis EMOTIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IN FINANCIAL REGULATION: GOING BEYOND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS* Peter H. Huang** Harold E. Kohn Chair Professor of Law James Beasley Law School Temple University 1719 North Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19122 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (215) 204-9836 Fax: (215) 204-1185 Abstract: This Article advocates that financial regulators analyze, measure, and take into account the emotional impacts of their policie s and procedures. Examples of emotional impacts are investor confidence, process concerns, and overall market or social mood. Investor confidence or trust in securities markets, process concerns about how much securities regulators actually deliberate over proposed rules, and financial anxiety or investment stress affect and are affected by financial economic variables, such as consumer debt, consumer expenditures, consumer wealth, corporate investment, initial public offerings, and securities market demand, liquidity, prices, supply, and volume. Cost-benefit analysis does not quantitatively consider interdependencies between regulations’ emotional impacts and their financial outcomes. Emotional impact analysis does. This Article addresses general conceptual and measurement issues about emotional impact analysis. Because financial regulations affect investors’ confidence, process concerns, and social moods , this Article analyzes how financial regulators can quantitatively analyze emotional impacts of their regulations. * Thanks to Chris Anderson, Bob Clark, Susan Franck, Joe
    [Show full text]