<<

American Mineralogist, Volume 77, pages 197-200, 1992

Capgaronnite, HgS'Ag(ClrBrrI), a new sulfide-halide from Var, France

Bnr.lN MlsoN National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, U.S.A. Wrr-r.r,LnnG. Murvrpm CSIRO Division of Mineral Products, P.O. Box l24,Port Melbourne, Victoria 3207, Australia Hl.r,rr- S.q,RP Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 434, Geneva, Switzerland

AssrRAcr ,ideally HgAg(Cl,Br,I)S, is a new mineral from the Cap-Garonnecopper- lead mine, Var, France. The mineral is orthorhombic, space gtoup P2t2r2' with a : 6.803(8), b : 12.87(l), c -- 4.528(7), and Z :4. The composition and of capgaronnite are related to those of perroudite [5HgS.4Ag(Cl,Br,I)] previously reported from the Cap-Garonne locality. Like perroudite, capga.ronnite probably crystallized fol- lowing decomposition of Hg- and Ag-bearing by halide-bearing solutions of marine origin. Capgaronnite is pleochroic in very thin splinters, with a : dark brown and 7 : gray to clear purple. The optical orientation is a : c, P : b, and "t : a' Indices of refraction measured by reflectance measurements on oriented crystals in polished section were d - : 2.2, t - 2.3; 0 could not be measuredbecause the crystalsare very thin parallel to B 6. A preliminary solution of the capgaronniteatomic iurangement(R : 0.17) was obtained from X-ray film intensities.In capgaronnite,(010) layersof face-sharedHg octahedrabuilt around chains ofcontinuous -S-Hg-S- bonds arejoined by cross-linked,paired groups of Ag tetrahedra.

INrnonucrroN Preliminary crystal structure analysis determined the ideal composition to be HgS'Ag(Cl,Br,I); new mineral Capgaronnite occurs in the Cap-Garonne (Var, France) status and name were approved for capgaronnite by the copperJead mine (Guillemin, 1952; Mari and Rostan, International Mineralogical Association Commission on 1986) and forms small tufted aggregatesor isolated crys- New and Mineral Names in May 1990' tals (maximurn width 0.02 mm and maximum length 0.1 mm) within cavities in Triassic conglomeratesand sand- PRoPERTTES stone.The mineral is associatedwith secondaryCu min- Prrvsrclr- AND oPTrcAL erals such as , , , par- Capgaronnite crystals are translucent to opaque, black nauite (Sarp et al., 1978), tennantite containing Ag and with a subadamantine-submetallicluster and black-gray Hg, strueverite, tourmaline, and perroudite (Sarp et al., . They are fragile, and the hardness could not be 1987;Mumme and Nickel, 1987). measured because of the srnall crystal size. The Electron microprobe analysis indicated the ideal for- is irregular; the {010} is perfect. mula HgS.Ag(Cl,Br,I) when an Ag defrciencyand a halide Crystals of capgaronnite are prismatic, elongated along excesswere assumed. Powder X-ray film data for the [001] and flattened on {010}. The observed forms are mineral were observed to be similar to those reported in {0 I 0}, { I 00}, { I I 0}, and thjl}. Conlact twinning is pres- the JCPDS file for tocornalite, a poorly defined Hg,Ag ent with the composition plane {ft0l}. iodide with no definite recorded composition or unit-cell The mineral is probably optically negative, but this is data. However, the substantial amount of S observed in very difficult to confirm because of the poor quality of analysesof the mineral from Cap-Garonnehad not been the convergencefigure and the submetallic character. The previously reported in the caseoftocornalite. refractive indices, which are high, could not be measured From the data available at this early stage it was de- because of reaction between the crystals and index oils. cided that this mineral was a new Hg,Ag sulfide-halide, They were determined by reflectance measurements on probably related to perroudite but with afrnities to to- oriented crystals in a polished section and yielded a - cornalite. Although now surmised,any closerelationship 2.2, t - 2.3; B could not be measuredbecause the crystals to tocornalite cannot be substantiated because a type are very thin parallel to p: b. specimen of that rnineral does not exist for comparison Optical orientation is a : c, P : b, and 7 : a. The (private communications, Paris Museum). crystals are pleochroic in very thin splinters with a : dark 0003404x/ 9210I 02-0l 97$02.00 197 198 MASON ET AL.: CAPGARONNITE, A NEW SULFIDE-HALIDE

TrEu 1. EPMAresults for capgaronnite TABLE3. Atomic coordinates and isotropic temperaturefactors for capgaronnite 1234 Atom Hg 56.61 53.20 52.97 52.83 53.98 53.92 52.24 Occupancy' Ag 19.96 22.11 26.97 21.66 29.27 23.99 28.09 Hg 1.0 0.134(s) 0.253(3) 0.464{6) 0.035(2) s 8.07 8.37 8.26 8.99 6.10 7.96 8.3s Ag 1.0 0.291(8) 0.0,f4(6) -0.010(8) 0.110(6) ct 10.81 10.38 10.64 11 .1 1 9.97 10.58 7.57 S 1.0 0.390(10)0.114(8) 0.468(9) 0.038(9) Br 5.13 5.33 5.06 5.17 5.16 5.17 3.75 X 0.8c1+ 0.281 0.383(7) 0.355(6) 0.0ir1(8) 0.110(9) | 0.06 0.00 0.34 0.54 o.7 0.33 'Occupancy Total 100.64 99.39 104.25 100.3 105.18101.95 100.00 of X based on electron microprobe analyses. Note.'Numbers 1-5, individualanalyses; 6, mean of 1-5; 7, calculated values with Cl:Br : 0.82:0.18 for ideat composition HgAg(Cl,Br,t)S. becauseof the volatility of the elements.Ag is particularly mobile, and the averagecrystal size is very small. ^y brown, : gray to clear purple. Density could not be Five analyseswere carried out using the Cameca au- measuredbecause of the small grain size.Calculatedden- tomated microprobe at Washington State University. The sity, basedon the idealized formula with Z: 4 and unit- standardsused were HgS (Hg, S), AgCl (Ag, CD, KBr (Br), cell volume, is 6.43(l) g/cm3;on the basisof the empirical and RbI (I). The analytical conditions were 15 kV, 6-pm- formula it is 6.19 g/cm3. diameter beam, 2.35-nA beam current, l0 s count time. The analytical results are listed in Table l. From those Crrnvrrcar, RELATToNs results the empirical formula on the basis of a total of Electron probe microanalysis of capgaronnitepresent- four atoms is HgonrAgoro(Cl,or,Bror.,Ioo,)So,no. The sim- ed significant difrculties (as was the casefor perroudite) plified formula is HgAg(Cl,Br,I)S, which, with Cl:Br : 0.82:0.18,requires Hg 52.24,Ag 28.09,Cl7 .57,Br 3.75, S 8.35 wto/0,total 100.0 wto/0. TABLE2. X-ray powderdiffraction data for capgaronniteand tocornalite(JCPDS data) X-nly sruDy Capgaronnite Tocornalite(JCPDS) Crystallographic relations dun X-ray single-crystalstudy by the precessionand Weis- 020 6.435 6.43 40 020 6.358 6.37 senbergmethods showedthat capgaronniteis orthorhom- 110 6.014 6.01 5 bic with spacegroup P222 and a : 6.803(8), b : 120 4.674 4.67 10 120 4.tr!8 4.67 r2.87(r), : a.528(7) V: 001 4.528 4.527 10 001 4.497 4.510 c A, 396.4 A'. 101 3.769 3.762 60 101 3.747 3.760 A powder pattern was obtained using a Gandolfi cam- 130 3.629 3.637 60 130 3.594 3.610 era (l14.6-mm diameter,Ni-filtered CuKa), and dvalues 111 3.595 200 3.402 3.386 10 200 3.390 3.390 were indexed using the cell dimensions determined from 210 3.289 3.283 30 210 3.276 3.290 the single-crystalprecession data (Table 2). u0 3.218 3.218 5 040 3.179 3.190 A single-crystalX-ray investigation performed at CSI- 220 3.007 2.996 c 220 2.991 2.998 140 2.909 2.905 10 140 2.878 2.894 RO, Melbourne, has elucidated the crystal structure of 201 2.720 2.712 5 capgaronnite.In addition to the precessiondata (obtained 230 2.665 2.664 100 230 2.648 2.644 proved 211 2.661 21'l 2.648 in Geneva), it feasible, using CuKa radiation, to 221 2.505 2.488 c 221 2.491 2.468 measure Weissenbergfilm pack data for the 0, l, and 2 240 2.337 2.319 10 240 2.319 2.309 levels for a crystal mounted along the c axis. The struc- 002 2.264 2.265 40 002 2.248 2.254 102 2.148 2.144 10 102 2.134 2.127 ture was solved by the traditional approachofcalculating 060 2.145 320 2.129 250 2.053 2.047 20 250 z.OU 2.036 160 2.046 TABLE4, Bondlengths for capgaronnitein angstroms 202 1.885 1.886 10 202 1.874 1.877 340 1.8s4 5 1.851 Capgaronnite Perroudite (average) o42 1.852 o42 1.836 1.834 232 1.726 1.724 J Hg-s' 2.40 2.35 o71 1.703 1.700 15 -s 2.49 2.42 350 1.702 -X 2.SO 3.20 400 1.701 400 1.695 1.695 _x1 3.'t4 3.27 052 1.700 _x2 3.17 3.42 17't 1.652 1.646 5 171 1.635 1.634 _x3 3.34 3.47 152 1.649 152 1.635 Mean 2.91 3.O2 420 1.644 Ag.S 2.44 2.53 242 1.626 _s2 2.61 2.62 270 1.617 1.614 5 _x. 2.71 2.76 080 1.609 _x1 3.05 3.01 302 1.602 1.591 D Mean 2.70 2.73 351 1.593 351 1.581 1.583 321 1.582 /Vole.'S': -1 + (y2+4,r/z- y, 1 - zt52: x,f, -1 + 4 X': -1 + (V2+ \,Vz - y, - ztx2: -1 + (y2+ 4,V" - y,1 - z,X': x, y, 1 /Vote.'lntensitiesare visual estimates of Gandolfifilm. + zt X1: Vz- x, -1 + (1/2+ il, -2. MASON ET AL.: CAPGARONNITE, A NEW SULFIDE-HALIDE t99 a 3-dimensional Pattersonfunction P(z,v,w) to determine the position of the heavy Hg atom. Fourier map and structure-factor calculation recycling methods were then used to locate, and least-squaresto refine, the positions of the other atoms in the asymmetric unit. Overall, a satisfactoryrefinement was achievedin spacegrottp P2t2t2 when one considersthat the reflections on the films were substantially smeared,particularly in the caseof the up- per level data, and the extremely high absorption coeffi- cient (p, : 1374 cm '). All calculations were made using a VAX computer and the SHELXT6 library of programs (Sheldrick,1976). The structure was eventually refined to an agreement R value of 0. 17 using isotropic temperature factors and absorption corrections for a thin prism shape.During these refinements the occupancy factor of the halide site was fixed at that determined by the EPMA study. Refined atom coordinates are given in Table 3, bond lengths in Table 4, and structure factors in Table 5.'

Crystal structure Fig. l. Projectiononto (001)ofthe structureofcapgaronnite joined The crystal structure of capgaronnite is illustrated in showingthe sheetsof Hg octahedra by Ag tetrahedra. -S-Hg-S- with heavylines. Small Figure 1. Parallel layers of face-sharedHg octahedrabuilt Continuous bondsare drawn circlesare (open)Ag, (hatched)Hg; largecircles are (open)S, around vertically stacked zig-zag chains of continuous (hatched)Cl,Br. Verticalcoordinates given indicatethat open -S-Hg-S-bonds arejoined by crossJinking(paired) groups atomsare at approximatelyz : 0, hatchedatoms at approxi- of Ag tetrahedra.As such, capgaronnitehas a very simple matelyz : t/2.The symbol(t) denotesthe origin. layer structure with the layers of Hg octahedra extending parallel to (010). The composition and crystal structure of capgaronnite That is to say, any (Cl,Br,I)'- substitution for S' that are related to those of perroudite, which was also found occurs in the anion site should be coupled with an equiv- at the Cap-Garonne locality. Capgaronnite, similar to alent Agr* for Hg2* substitution in the octahedral cation perroudite, most likely crystallized following decompo- site (Hg). However, Ag contents are consistently low in sition of Hg and Ag bearing tennantite by halide-bearing the EPMA results, probably becauseit becomesmobile solutions, probably of marine origin. Perroudite, with the when the electron beam strikes the polished surface of ideal composition 5HgS' 4Ag(Cl,Br,I), has three-member the crystals (chargerepulsion effect) and cannot be mea- groups of face-shared Hg octahedra in its structure sured accuratelyin the sample. In the sameway, it is felt (Mumme and Nickel, 1987). In the elimination of Hg that the measuredhalide excessmay also be the result of octahedra to create the l:l HgS:AgCl stoichiometry, the shortcomingsin the analytical method rather than exces- extremely regular layerlike arrangement of capgaronnite sive substitution trends in the anion sites.However, it is is realized. As in the caseofperroudite, the face-sharing probable that such a coupled substitution does exist over element in capgaronnite is similar to that observed in a limited range of composition, and the overall compo- corderoite [a-HgrSrCl, (Frueh and Gray, 1968)],CuHgCl, sition of capgaronnite is more accurately given by the and CuHgSBr (Guillo et al.,1979). The type of edgeshar- formula (l + x)HgS'(l - x)Ag(Cl,Br,I). ing ofHg octahedratypical ofcinnabar, and observedin 6sTocoRNALrrEtt perroudite, is not found in the crystal structure of cap- RrmrroNsrrrP To garonnite. In the course of the new mineral proposal to IMA, it was pointed out that the powder X-ray diffraction data Rrnalnxs oN cRysrAL{HEMTcAL RELI\TIoNS for the minerals capgaronnite and tocornalite are strik- Neither the analytical data nor the results of crystal ingly similar. The JCPDS data reported for tocornalite structure refinement yield data accurate enough to detect may be indexed using the slightly smaller cell a : 6.78, any substitution of Ag'* for Hg'* in the metal sites in b: 12.72,c: 4.50 A gaUte 2). The X-ray data obtained capgaronnite. Such substitution could be inferred from by Mason (1972) andreported in his note to have derived the halide:S ratios that are consistently greater than 1.0. from Broken Hill tocornalite and sample C906 in the U.S. National Museum labeled tocornalite, Chanarcilla, Chile, may not in fact have been obtained from tocor- ' Copiesof Table5 maybe orderedas Document AM-92-489 nalite cotypes. Domeyko (1867) originally reported to- from the BusinessOffice, Mineralogical Society of America,I130 of the Bro- SeventeenthStreet NW, Suite 330, Washington,DC 20036, cornalite to be a silver- iodide. Some U.S.A.Please remit $5.00in advancefor the microfiche. ken Hill mineral (USNM 134015)was donatedby B.M. 200 MASON ET AL.: CAPGARONNITE, A NEW SULFIDE-HALIDE for EPMA study at CSIRO, and several (good) analyses Frueh, A.H., and Gray, N. (1968) Confirmation and refinement of the yielded the average formula Hg, structure of HgrS 2C12.Actz Crystallographica, 824, 1670-167 l. orAgorrS, on(Clo rr,Bro on, (1952) et m6tallogenique du glte Ioo,). yielded Guillemin, C. Etude min6ralogique Most ofthe analyses very low totals because plumbocuprifdre du Cap-Garonne (Var). Bulletin de la Soci6tCfrangaise of the fine-grained nature of the material. de Min6ralogie et de Crisrallographie, 7 5, 7U 175. Thus the Broken Hill (and presumably the Chilean) Guillo, M., Mercy, B., and Deschanvres,A. (1979) SystemsCuX (X : specimenis chemically different from Domeyko's tocor- Cl,Br)-HgS. Etude des compos6s CuHgSX (X : Cl,Br). Materials Re- -954. nalite and may well be identical to capgaronnite(in fact searchBulletin, 14, 947 (1986) (Var). Gilo- judging Mari, G., and Rostan, P. I-a Mine du Cap-Garonne most probably it is, from the above analyses).An logie er Min6ralogie. IMG, Draguignan, France. attempt was made by B.M. to obtain some of Domeyko's Mason, B. (1972) Tocornalite. Smithsonian Contribution to the Earth type specimen from the National Museum in Paris, but Sciences.9.79-80. the reply from H.-J. Schubnel of that institution stated Mumme, W.G., and Nickel, E.H. (1987) Crystal structure and crystal perroudite: A mineral from Coppin Pool, Western Aus- that museum possess chemistry of the does not a type specimen of tralia. American Mineralogist, 72, 1257-1262. tocornalite, and he actually considersthe mineral to be a Sarp, H., Deferne, J., and Liebich, B.W. (1978) Pr6sencede parnauite un mixture, not a speciesin its own right. Thus it seemsmost nouveau sulfo-arseniate de cuiwe, dans la rnine de la Garonne (Var, appropriate that tocornalite should be abandoned as an France).Archives des Sciences(Gendve), 3l(3),312-317. inadequately described mineral. Its identity with the more Sarp, H., Birch, D.W., Hlava, F.P., Pring, A., Sewell,K.B.D., andNickel, E.H. (1987) Perroudite, a new sulfide-halideofHg and Ag from Cap- realistically characterizedcapgaronnite may remain un- Garonne, Var, France, and from Broken Hill, New South Wales, and solved for the present. Coppin Pool, western Australia. American Mineralogist, 72, l25l- 1256. AcxNowr,nncMENTS Sheldrick, G.M. (1976) SHELX 76. Program for crystal structure deter- mination. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England. We would like to thank J.M. Hughes for considerable help during the revrew process.

RxrnnrNcns crrED

Domeyko, I. (1867) Mineralojia de Chile, Appendix II, 41. Libreria Cen- M.lNnscnrrr RECETvEDFpsnuARv 20, 1991 tral de Servat y Ca., Sandiago. M,trqr;scn-rrr AccEprED Sep,reunen I I, l99l