Morgan Stanley - Select UMA Account # 1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Market Impacts of Sharing Economy Entrants: Evidence from USA and China
Electronic Commerce Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-09328-1 The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China Yue Guo1,2 · Fu Xin1 · Xiaotong Li3 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract This paper studies the link between the difusion of the sharing economy and tra- ditional mature industries by empirically examining the economic impacts of shar- ing economy entrants. This study adds to the ongoing debate over whether and how ride-hailing platforms infuence new car sales in USA and China. Our results sug- gest that the short-term impact of Didi Chuxing’s entry on new car sales is positive. Unlike the efect of Didi Chuxing on new car sales in China, Uber’s entry nega- tively infuences new car sales in USA. The entry of Didi Chuxing is related to a 9.24% increase in new car sales in China and the entry of Uber is related to an 8.1% decrease in new car sales in USA. We further empirically confrm that the impact of ride-hailing companies is trivial in small cities. Keywords Collaborative consumption models · Uber · Didi · Ride-hailing services · Sharing economy · Two-sided platforms 1 Introduction Over the last few years, the rapid proliferation of smartphones and the associated applications have fueled rapid growth of the online sharing economy, such as those of Uber, Airbnb, Lyft, Turo, and Peerby. These emerging online peer-to-peer plat- forms, collectively known as ‘collaborative consumption’, have made a great deal * Fu Xin [email protected] * Xiaotong Li [email protected] Yue Guo [email protected] 1 Hohai Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, China 2 King’s Business School, King’s College London, London, UK 3 College of Business, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Y. -
2020 ESG Report
ESG Report 20202020 An environmental, social, and governanceESG report for investors Report ESG Report 2020 - DRAFT - Company Confidential 1 We are proud to share Uber’s 2020 ESG Report, which highlights our perspective on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues that matter most to our business and our stakeholders—including platform users (drivers, delivery people, merchants, and consumers), employees, cities, regulators, and investors. The report is intended to provide a high-level overview of Uber’s views on, approach to, and performance on key ESG issues. Additional content regarding these issues, and more, can be found on Uber.com. Data is as of December 31, 2019, unless otherwise noted. Narrative may cover material through August 31, 2020. ESG Report 2020 - DRAFT - Company Confidential 2 Table of contents Uber’s purpose 4 Our cultural norms 5 Letter from our CEO 6 Our business 7 About this report 9 Oversight of ESG at Uber 11 Integrity and trust 17 User safety 24 COVID-19 response 27 Driver and delivery person well-being 32 Diversity, inclusion, and culture 35 Local impact 43 Climate change 47 Performance data 53 Notes from performance data 62 Terms used in this report 65 Indexing 67 ESG Report 2020 3 Uber’s Purpose Why we exist To reimagine the way the world moves for the better What we do Make real life easier to navigate for everyone Who we are Fearless optimists: crazy enough to believe, tenacious enough to make it happen ESG Report 2020 4 Our cultural norms Our 8 cultural norms reflect who we are and where we’re going. -
The Ridesharing Revolution: Economic Survey and Synthesis
The Ridesharing Revolution: Economic Survey and Synthesis Robert Hahn and Robert Metcalfe* January 10, 2017 Paper prepared for Oxford University Press Volume IV: More Equal by Design: Economic design responses to inequality. Eds. Scott Duke Kominers and Alex Teytelboym. Abstract Digital ridesharing platforms, such as Uber and Lyft, are part of a broader suite of innovations that constitute what is sometimes referred to as the sharing economy. In this essay, we provide an overview of current research on the economic efficiency and equity characteristics of ridesharing platforms, and provide a research agenda that includes an examination of the natural evolution toward driverless cars. We have three main findings: first, relatively little is known about either the equity and efficiency properties of ridesharing platforms, but this is likely to change as companies and researchers focus on these issues. Second, we may be able to learn something about the likely diffusion and benefits of these technologies from experience with other policies and technologies. Third, while we believe these platforms will do substantially more good than harm, the measurement, distribution, and size of the gains from these technologies requires further research. * Robert Hahn is professor and director of economics at the Smith School at the University of Oxford, a non-resident senior fellow at Brookings, and a senior fellow at the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy. Robert Metcalfe is Postdoctoral Research Scholar in Economics at the University of Chicago. We would like to thank Ted Gayer, Jonathan Hall, Scott Kominers, Jonathan Meer, Alex Teytelboym, Scott Wallsten, and Cliff Winston for helpful comments and Julia Schmitz, Brian Campbell and Samantha van Urk for excellent research assistance. -
Uber Technologies Inc.: Managing Opportunities and Challenges
Center for Ethical Organizational Cultures Auburn University http://harbert.auburn.edu Uber Technologies Inc.: Managing Opportunities and Challenges INTRODUCTION Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) is a tech startup that provides ride sharing services by facilitating a connection between independent contractors (drivers) and riders with the use of an app. Uber has expanded its operations to 58 countries around the world and is valued at around $41 billion. Because its services costs less than taking a traditional taxi, in the few years it has been in business Uber and similar ride sharing services have upended the taxi industry. The company has experienced resounding success and is looking toward expansion both internationally and within the United States. However, Uber’s rapid success is creating challenges in the form of legal and regulatory, social , and technical obstacles. The taxi industry, for instance, is arguing that Uber has an unfair advantage because it does not face the same licensing requirements as they do. Others accuse Uber of not vetting their drivers, creating potentially unsafe situations. An accusation of rape in India has brought this issue of safety to the forefront. Some major cities are banning ride sharing services like Uber because of these various concerns. Additionally, Uber has faced various lawsuits, including a lawsuit filed against them by its independent contractors. Its presence in the market has influenced lawmakers to draft new re gulations to govern this “app-driven” ride sharing system. Legislation can often hinder a company’s expansion opportunities because of the resources it must expend to comply with regulatory requirements. Uber has been highly praised for giving independent contractors an opportunity to earn money as long as they have a car while also offering convenient ways for consumers to get around at lower costs. -
Quarterly Commentary—Artisan Developing World Fund
QUARTERLY Artisan Developing World Fund FactCommentary Sheet Investor Class: ARTYX | Advisor Class: APDYX | Institutional Class: APHYX As of 30 September 2018 NAFTA resolution, the future policy direction of President-Elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador and the direction of monetary Portfolio Management policy in Mexico which is likely to favor shallow rate cuts and stable Lewis S. Kaufman, CFA net interest margins for the bank. Visa continues to benefit from higher discretionary spending in the US, and strength in the emerging markets as visible in the company’s cross-border business. Dear Fellow Shareholder: Key detractors from performance for the quarter included Chinese Market Backdrop educational services provider TAL Education Group, Chinese Internet firm Tencent, surveillance and security provider Hangzhou Artisan Developing World Fund (Investor Class) returned -5.66% for Hikvision Digital Technology, Argentine bank Grupo Financiero the quarter ended September 30, 2018, versus -1.09% for the MSCI Galicia and Macau casino operator Galaxy Entertainment Group. Emerging Markets Index (all returns in USD unless stated TAL suffered as the Chinese government provided updated policy otherwise). Since June 30, 2015, Artisan Developing World Fund guidance on the education sector, which is likely to result in more has returned 15.62% cumulatively, versus 16.47% for the MSCI restrictive standards for new teachers, course offerings and Emerging Markets Index. Muted market returns mask a varied and classroom utilization, and which could pressure margins and school at times tumultuous emerging markets backdrop, sparked by US expansion in the near term even as it benefits industry leaders trade tensions with China and a challenging external environment. -
Mercadolibre Annual Report 2021
MercadoLibre Annual Report 2021 Form 10-K (NASDAQ:MELI) Published: March 1st, 2021 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-33647 MercadoLibre, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter) Delaware 98-0212790 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) Pasaje Posta 4789, 6th Floor Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1430EKG (Address of registrant’s principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (+5411) 4640-8000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share MELI Nasdaq Global Select Market 2.375% Sustainability Notes due 2026 MELI26 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 3.125% Notes due 2031 MELI31 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. -
Platform Economy December, 2018
The rise of the platform economy December, 2018 The rise of the platform economy The platform economy poses significant questions, challenges and opportunities for society, the labour market and organisations The world is going through a new economic revolution, disrupting the economy, businesses, labour markets and our daily lives in a way not seen since the industrial revolution. Driven by technological innovations and increased online connectivity, the role of digital labour market matching is rising. At the heart of this change is the rise of the platform economy1. Workers are finding work through online outsourcing platforms and apps in this so called platform economy. While the gig economy has been talked about for years, the rise of the economy through digital platforms is relatively new. As the platform economy evolves, there are both new opportunities as well as new challenges that arise with heightened complexity. This article explores some of the challenges and future questions related to the rise of the platform economy for both society and organisations tapping into the platform economy. 1 Kenney & Zysman, 2016: 64 What is the platform economy? An increasing number of businesses are starting to adopt the platform business model and its digital strategies in order to remain competitive. Companies such as Airbnb, Uber, Amazon, Google, Salesforce and Facebook are creating online networks that facilitate digital interactions between people. There is a large variation between the function and type of digital platforms available in today’s marketplace, ranging from platforms providing services (e.g., Uber and Airbnb), to products (e.g. Amazon and eBay), to payments (e.g., Square, PayPal), to software development (e.g., Apple, Salesforce) and many more. -
Release Date: 06-30-2021
Release Date: 06-30-2021 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Foreign Large Growth The investment seeks to provide long-term capital as of 03-31-21 % Assets as of 03-31-21 % Mkt Cap appreciation. U.S. Stocks 12.2 Large Giant The fund invests predominantly in the stocks of Non-U.S. Stocks 86.9 ........................................................ Mid Large companies located outside the United States and is Bonds 0.0 Cash 0.7 Medium expected to diversify its assets in countries across Small Other 0.3 Small developed and emerging markets. In selecting stocks, the ........................................................ fund's advisors evaluate foreign markets around the world Value Blend Growth Micro and choose large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies considered to have above-average growth potential. The fund uses multiple investment advisors. as of 03-31-21 % Assets as of 03-31-21 % Fund ASML Holding NV 6.82 Americas 17.84 ........................................................................................................ Tencent Holdings Ltd 5.38 North America 13.38 Initial Inception Date 08-13-01 MercadoLibre Inc 4.09 Latin America 4.46 Management Company Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited Tesla Inc 3.49 Greater Europe -
Online Transportation Price War: Indonesian Style
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Klaipeda University Open Journal Systems SAKTI HENDRA PRAMUDYA ONLINE TRANSPORTATION PRICE WAR: INDONESIAN STYLE ONLINE TRANSPORTATION PRICE WAR: INDONESIAN STYLE Sakti Hendra Pramudya1 Universitas Bina Nusantara (Indonesia), University of Pécs (Hungary) ABStrAct thanks to the brilliant innovation of the expanding online transportation companies, the Indonesian people are able to obtain an affor- dable means of transportation. this three major ride-sharing companies (Go-Jek, Grab, and Uber) provide services which not only limited to transportation service but also providing services for food delivery, courier service, and even shopping assistance by utili- zing gigantic armada of motorbikes and cars which owned by their ‘driver partners’. these companies are competing to gain market share by implementing the same strategy which is offering the lowest price. this paper would discuss the Indonesian online trans- portation price war by using price comparison analysis between three companies. the analysis revealed that Uber was the winner of the price war, however, their ‘lowest price strategy’ would lead to their downfall not only in Indonesia but in all of South East Asia. KEYWOrDS: online transportation companies, price war, Indonesia. JEL cODES: D40, O18, O33 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v29i3.2000 Introduction the idea of ride-hailing was unfamiliar to Indonesian people. Before the inception (and followed by the large adoption) of smartphone applications in Indonesia, the market of transportation service was to- tally different. the majority of middle to high income Indonesian urban dwellers at that time was using the conventional taxi as their second option of transportation after their personal car or motorbike. -
NASDAQ Stock Market
Nasdaq Stock Market Friday, December 28, 2018 Name Symbol Close 1st Constitution Bancorp FCCY 19.75 1st Source SRCE 40.25 2U TWOU 48.31 21st Century Fox Cl A FOXA 47.97 21st Century Fox Cl B FOX 47.62 21Vianet Group ADR VNET 8.63 51job ADR JOBS 61.7 111 ADR YI 6.05 360 Finance ADR QFIN 15.74 1347 Property Insurance Holdings PIH 4.05 1-800-FLOWERS.COM Cl A FLWS 11.92 AAON AAON 34.85 Abiomed ABMD 318.17 Acacia Communications ACIA 37.69 Acacia Research - Acacia ACTG 3 Technologies Acadia Healthcare ACHC 25.56 ACADIA Pharmaceuticals ACAD 15.65 Acceleron Pharma XLRN 44.13 Access National ANCX 21.31 Accuray ARAY 3.45 AcelRx Pharmaceuticals ACRX 2.34 Aceto ACET 0.82 Achaogen AKAO 1.31 Achillion Pharmaceuticals ACHN 1.48 AC Immune ACIU 9.78 ACI Worldwide ACIW 27.25 Aclaris Therapeutics ACRS 7.31 ACM Research Cl A ACMR 10.47 Acorda Therapeutics ACOR 14.98 Activision Blizzard ATVI 46.8 Adamas Pharmaceuticals ADMS 8.45 Adaptimmune Therapeutics ADR ADAP 5.15 Addus HomeCare ADUS 67.27 ADDvantage Technologies Group AEY 1.43 Adobe ADBE 223.13 Adtran ADTN 10.82 Aduro Biotech ADRO 2.65 Advanced Emissions Solutions ADES 10.07 Advanced Energy Industries AEIS 42.71 Advanced Micro Devices AMD 17.82 Advaxis ADXS 0.19 Adverum Biotechnologies ADVM 3.2 Aegion AEGN 16.24 Aeglea BioTherapeutics AGLE 7.67 Aemetis AMTX 0.57 Aerie Pharmaceuticals AERI 35.52 AeroVironment AVAV 67.57 Aevi Genomic Medicine GNMX 0.67 Affimed AFMD 3.11 Agile Therapeutics AGRX 0.61 Agilysys AGYS 14.59 Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO 45.3 AGNC Investment AGNC 17.73 AgroFresh Solutions AGFS 3.85 -
New Strategies for the Platform Economy
SPECIAL COLLECTION STRATEGY New Strategies for the Platform Economy To reap the rewards and avoid the risks, companies exploring a platform business model must look carefully at their partnerships and growth strategy. Brought to you by: SPRING 2021 NEW STRATEGIES FOR THE PLATFORM ECONOMY SPECIAL REPORT 1 9 17 Competing on How Healthy Is Your Platform Scaling, Platforms Business Ecosystem? Fast and Slow THE DOMINANT DIGITAL PLATFORMS are now among the world’s most phases. At each stage, there are specific early valuable — and most powerful — companies, leaving a huge swath of organizations forced indicators to look for that point to potential to play by their rules. In this new competitive environment, businesses need new ways to failure. Tracking the appropriate metrics gain advantage despite platforms’ constraints and market clout. And businesses seeking to for each stage and being alert to red flags create successful platform ecosystems find that while the rewards can be great, the helps businesses pivot to a new approach or likelihood of failure is high. This special report examines the challenges faced by both limit their losses. platform owners and participants. Platforms aiming for market dominance have typically prioritized rapid growth. The asymmetries in power and infor- attention from U.S. and European regulators, However, Max Büge and Pinar Ozcan have mation between platform owners and the whose scrutiny of dominant platforms’ found that scaling quickly is not the right businesses reliant on them have implications practices may lead to shifts in the prevailing strategy in all circumstances: Pursuing fast for the traditional levers of competitive balance of power. -
Altegris /AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund
Altegris /AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) September 30, 2020 Shares Value COMMON STOCK - 36.1 % ASSET MANAGEMENT - 0.4 % 32,801 Brookfield Infrastructure Corp. $ 1,816,854 ELECTRIC UTILITIES - 0.9 % 77,975 Brookfield Renewable Corporation 4,569,320 LEISURE TIME - 12.5 % 484,238 Caesars Entertainment, Inc. * 27,146,382 3,344,000 Drive Shack, Inc. * 3,745,280 98,756 Las Vegas Sands Corp. 4,607,955 1,054,511 MGM Resorts International 22,935,614 60,393 Wynn Resorts Ltd. 4,336,821 62,772,052 REAL ESTATE - 3.0 % 890,864 IQHQ *^(a)(b) 14,887,852 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES - 5.1 % 30,069 CoStar Group, Inc. * 25,513,847 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - 14.2 % 449,324 GDS Holdings Ltd. - ADR *+ 36,768,183 2,215,783 Switch, Inc. 34,588,373 71,356,556 TOTAL COMMON STOCK (Cost - $144,134,832) 180,916,481 PARTNERSHIP SHARES -13.9 % ELECTRIC UTILITIES - 5.7 % 250,509 Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP 11,929,239 311,899 Brookfield Renewable Partners LP 16,390,292 28,319,531 SPECIALTY FINANCE - 8.2 % 2,399,241 Fortress Transportation & Infrastructure Investors LLC 41,098,998 TOTAL PARTNERSHIP SHARES (Cost - $47,859,371) 69,418,529 REITS - 62.6 % REITS - 62.1 % 181,610 Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. + 29,057,600 144,893 American Tower Corp. + 35,024,985 240,140 Americold Realty Trust 8,585,005 217,330 Crown Castle International Corp. + 36,185,445 232,737 CyrusOne, Inc. 16,298,572 25,447 Equinix, Inc. 19,343,028 234,215 Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.