DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Television Industry] Anonymous

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Television Industry] Anonymous Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 8 Volume 8, Number 1 (August 1970) Comment: [Canadian Television Industry] Anonymous Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Commentary Citation Information Anonymous. "Comment: [Canadian Television Industry]." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 8.1 (1970) : 171-182. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol8/iss1/8 This Commentary is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. COMMENT The following note represents random comments and observations on the television industry. The fact that these observations are those of two Canadians, Murray Chercover* and to a somewhat lesser extent, Charles Templeton**, makes them of interest to the Canadian reader. The authors did want it be noted that the lack of syntax and fragmental character is due to the transcriptionalorigin. With increased leisure time available in the future, television program- ming will change in a variety of ways. Audiences will be fragmented, resulting in a dilution of the quality of program service that a network can provide. The goal of the Broadcasting Act, to preserve and strengthen our Canadian identity, should not be defaulted by simply turning our views over to nations which, because of their large markets, can produce relatively cheap programs. Quantitative measurement of Canadian content and ownership controls will not achieve the goal. An alternative may be the development of a qualitative measurement. The changes predicted by Messrs. Chercover and Templeton (an increase in actuality, documentary, and escape programming along with the emergence of CATV local programming) are likely to have enormous effects on the CTV network itself as well as television programming in general. As policy makers for the private CTV network (made up at present of twelve English affiliates in Canadian major cities) the authors have a unique experience and responsibility in seeking out programming and the revenues necessary to sustain it. The problems facing the CTV network in the next few years are particularly critical and challenging, and relate in a variety of ways to the subjects discussed in the earlier articles. 1. In regard to the CTV's immediate programming plans, particularly in the context of the Canadian content regulations recently announced by the Canadian Radio-Television Commission, see the CTV renewal hearing reported in CRTC Transcript of Hearing, Ottawa, April 14-15, 1970, and the contemporaneous individual renewal applications by the 12 CTV affiliates. 2. The CTV network is unique in that it is owned by its affiliates rather than the reverse. This arrangement stems from a reorganization in 1966, reported in BBG Transcript of Hearing, Ottawa, Feb. 23, 1966, approved by the Board of Broadcast Governors in CTV Network, [1966] BBG Decisions (Mar. 4), subject to a one station-one vote rule that prohibited the ownershio by one person of more than one CTV affiliate. [See also Calgary - CFCN-TV, [1966] BBG Decisions (May 9); BBG Transcript of Hearing, Ottawa, April 26-27, 1966, pp. 405-434.1 After applying the CTV ownership rule in a number of situations where it found it convenient for other reasons to do so [see, e.g. Vancouver - CHAN-TV, [1968] CRTC Decisions 38 (June 13); Moose Jaw - CHA4B-TV, CHRE-TV, [1968] CRTC Decisions 37 (May 30) and [1969] CRTC Decisions 253 (July 18)] *President, CTV Television Network *Formerly Director of News and Public Affairs, CTV Network and presently Consultant to the network. OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [V€OL. 8, NO. I the CRTC announced a reconsideration of the policy in 1969, and after a hearing on the question [CRTC Transcript of Hearing, Vancouver, October 14, 1969, pp. 2-33] decided to abandon it as a strict rule and adjudicate future share transfers on a case by case basis. [CTV Ownership Policy, [1969] CRTC Decisions 402 (Dec. 23)]. The first such adjudication involves the Bushnell Communications bid to add the Montreal CTV affiliate (CFCF-TV) to its present Ottawa station (CJOH-TV), following the foreign ownership divestment required by Order-in-Council P.C. 1969- 2229, November 24, 1969. This share transfer is to be considered by the Commission at its hearings commencing on June 16, 1970, and the result will colour CTV ownership policy for some time to come. 3. The intensification of interest by the public in documentary and actuality programming has been evident for some time on the CTV network, with impressive ratings received for programs like the National Geographic specials and the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. With the recent promulgation of greatly intensified Canadian content regulations, the present emphasis by CTV on international co-productions in this area should greatly increase, particularly if the CRTC takes a long-term and practical approach to co-production approvals. The reaction and perform- ance of the CTV network is obviously at the heart of the quality vs. quantity controversy raised by the Canadian content quota, since the net- work constitutes the only means for distributing additional Canadian programming to the marginal centres least able to afford it. 4. The impact of cable television on conventional television is highlighted by the authors in terms of (a) the development of an alternative and local-oriented role for CATV, (b) the increasing fragmentation of audiences and the conflict between the vastly increased demands for programming material and the advertising revenue needed to sustain it, and (c) the loss of channel number identification and the degradation in signal for locally-carried Canadian signals. These and other issues have also been discussed in Canada before the Special Senate Committee on the Mass Media, before the CRTC in the hearings on microwave policy and before the Commons Broadcasting Committee. See previous commentaries for specific references. PETER GRANT. Of the major technologies, television is the youngest; it may also be the most consequential. For good or ill - and there are as many different judg- ments on that as there are individuals - it directly touches more lives more significantly than any single invention man has devised. Even now in its infancy - and commercial television is only 27 years old - it has become one of the most dominant factors of contemporary Western life. Its effects have not yet begun to be measured and even those who work at the heart of it have no definite understanding of its ramifications within society. More, they cannot predict with any precision what television will be like a mere decade or two down the road. Even now technological changes are at work within the industry which will alter the form almost beyond recognition, and a variety of factors are at work which will also alter the content. The technological changes will be enormous. Governments and business enterprises are now occupied with the problems and possibilities of instan- 1970] Access to the Mass Media taneous, world-wide, simultaneous direct-to-home transmission by satellite. We know of the imminent prospects of laser beams and of the subminiaturiza- tion which will affect field equipment. We realistically envisage dramatic changes in home reception and presentation equipment. Screen sizes will both expand and contract, automated recording and playback equipment in the home will provide a library capacity and constant availability. World-wide, universal color standards and three dimensional reception are inevitable. Cable television will become virtually a utility; improving picture reception, pro- liferating the number of available channels, intensifying local programming and providing a multi-channel grid capable of providing extra-television services. It must also be recognized that the burgeoning television era is coincident with the age of automation. The industrial revolution replaced the need for man's muscle; the cybernetic revolution will, in large part, replace man's brain. Automation makes possible more and better production with less man- power and fewer working hours, and all of this leads to more leisure. An increase in leisure time means more time to watch television and this will affect programming (and, as we shall see, revenue) in a variety of ways. First, actuality programming will increase enormously. Cameras will go wherever man can go. They have already gone to the moon. With no need for cables, supplementary lighting or mobile units - they will go into court- rooms, judicial enquiries, houses of parliaments, and right into the heart of of wars, sports events, riots, etc. The world will become a neighborhood even if it does not become a brotherhood, with instantaneous transmission from any part of the globe. Any event, anywhere in the world will impinge upon our lives. Our awareness of the world will be instantaneous and virtually total. Our knowledge of others will increase and the word 'exotic' will lose its essential meaning. Second, there will be a great leap forward in educational television, not only in instructional programming (television treatment of curriculum material) but in enrichment programming. With much of the creativity and satisfaction normally derived from work gone, the average man will need to replace it or have his spirit suffer stultification or boredom. There is little doubt but that he will develop an intensified interest in the arts, and programming will move to meet this need with more drama, music and new approaches to literature. So swift is the acceleration of change in our society that retraining will be a normal part of life. The proliferation of information will require the individual to update his knowledge regularly, and the ideal medium with which to accomplish this is educational television. Third, there will be an increase in "escape" programming. With the intensification of the pace of life in Western civilization since roughly the turn of the century, men and women have increasingly used entertainment OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [VOL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "'Ce';;) .. ·· LES GARANTS D'achevement 'Toronto, John Ross, (416) 466-2760 (\\,\'0" ••• ' Pour Series De Television, Longs Metrages Telex: 055-62276 {'
    CINEMA CAN •A D A BY JIM LEVESQUE George Wright, Helene Fournier, Philip he following is a list of current projects being produced in ATLANTIS p. Paul Saltzman lOp. p . Harold JacksDa.. (416)462-0246 THE WAY WE ARE TIchenor pelt. prod p. Paul Quigley Canada. Only TV series and films over one hour are An anrhok>gy series which showcases p. man. Gordon Mark eXK. 11 . con •. TNI! TWILIQNT ZON. ....KO FILMS LTD. a collection of regional dr8mas Ann MacNaughton d . Rex Bromfield, included. Projects are separated into four categories: On london Films snd AtlantiS Films are (416) 960.3228 T produced in Vancouver, Edmonton, Ken Jubenvill. Allan King, Alan collaborating with CBS BroAdcast THE LAIT fRONTll!R Location, Pre-production, Projects in Negotiation, and In the Can. Calgary. Winnipeg, Regina, Toronto, Simmonds, BradTurnerlI18. d. T. W. Intemational on 30 new 1/2h scl·fi The third season of tne 70 x 1/2h TV Ottawa, Montreal, Halifax, and St. PaacO(;~e, Mick MacKay d.o. p. Bob While films in the project stage are subject to change, only those episodes of the classic series series about the sea. This JOhn·s.ex8C.p. Robert Alten pub. Ennis loc. man. George Horie calt.. Shooting through '88 on location in ad\lenture/documentary series Is in active pre-production at the time of publication - those which Susan Procter wrtterl Peter Roberts, Trish Robinson extral. Annette T oronlo. Delivery at the shows is s1ated co-produced by Mako Films ltd. and Jona1han Campbell, David Pe1ersen, McCafferey art d. Jill Scott pub.
    [Show full text]
  • AGREEMENT Between CTV Television, Division of Bell Media
    AGREEMENT between CTV Television, Division of Bell Media Inc. TORONTO, ONTARIO - and - COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA (LOCAL 720-M) January 1, 2012 To December 31, 2017 Table of Contents Article Page 1 Intent ................................................................. 1 Definitions 2.1 Employee .......................................................... 2 2.2 Bargaining Unit ................................................. 2 2.3 Employee Categories ........................................ 3 3 Management Rights .......................................... 5 Union Rights 4.1 Membership and Dues ...................................... 6 4.2 Notices to Union ............................................... 8 4.3 Union Access to Premises ................................. 8 4.4 Union Use of Bulletin Boards ........................... 9 4.5 Leave For Union Activities ............................... 9 4.6 Non-Discrimination .......................................... 11 5 No Strike, Lockouts or Strike-breaking ............ 11 6 Grievance Procedure ......................................... 12 7 Reports on Performance .................................... 15 Table of Contents Article Page Seniority Rights 8.1 Company Seniority ........................................... 17 8.2 Unit Seniority .................................................... 17 8.3 Promotion and Transfers ................................... 17 8.4 Dismissal, Demotion and Suspension 18 8.5 Layoffs .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2015 Corus
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM Fiscal year ended August 31, 2015 Corus Entertainment Inc. November 9, 2015 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM ‐ CORUS ENTERTAINMENT INC. Table of Contents FORWARD‐LOOKING STATEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 3 INCORPORATION OF CORUS .................................................................................................................. 4 Organization and Name ............................................................................................................................ 4 Subsidiaries ............................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................... 5 Significant Acquisitions and Divestitures ................................................................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................................. 6 Strategic Priorities .................................................................................................................................... 6 Radio ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Description of the Industry ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 13 January 2014
    20 November 2014 John Traversy Secretary General CRTC Ottawa, ON K1A 0N2 Dear Mr. Secretary General, Re: Application 2014‐0793‐2, Broadcasting Notices of Consultation 2014‐541 and 2014‐541‐1 (Ottawa, 21 October 2014 and 27 October 2014) 1 The Forum for Research and Policy in Communications (FRPC) is a non‐profit and non‐partisan organization established to undertake research and policy analysis about communications, including broadcasting. The Forum supports a strong Canadian broadcasting system and regulation that serves the public interest. 2 FRPC is pleased to participate in the process initiated by Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2014‐541, to address the application for a network licence submitted by Rogers Sports Inc. (RSI), the licensee of the Category C specialty service known as Sportsnet. The Forum opposes RSI’s application as it is current set eout, on th grounds of insufficient evidence: RSI has presented too little information to enable the CRTC to know what it would be licensing, and the information that RSI has presented does not establish that its network licence will serve the public interest by achieving Parliament’s objects for the broadcasting system, or by improving or strengthening that system. 3 The Forum wishes to be considered as an intervener in this proceeding, and respectfully requests the opportunity to appear at the hearing scheduled for 8 January 2015 to set out its views in greater detail and to respond to the applicant. Our contact information is provided at the end of our intervention. I The application by Rogers Sports Inc. 4 This section sets out the facts and arguments being made by RSI in support of the application that is asking the CRTC to approve.
    [Show full text]
  • The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern'
    Canadian Journal of Law and Technology Volume 5 Number 3 Article 1 8-1-2006 The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern' Monica Auer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt Part of the Computer Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Monica Auer, "The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern'" (2006) 5:3 CJLT. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Journal of Law and Technology by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The CRTC’s Enforcement of Canada’s Broadcasting Legislation: ‘‘Concern’’, ‘‘Serious Concern’’, and ‘‘Grave Concern’’ M.L. Auer, M.A., LL.M.† I. Introduction again in 2004, by the Parliamentary Standing Com- mittee on Heritage. Generally speaking, however, these his paper describes results from a quantitative study studies used case-based analyses wherein the conclusions T of the enforcement by the Canadian Radio-televi- necessarily depended on the cases reviewed. This paper sion and Telecommunications Commission 1 (CRTC or adopts a broadly based empirical approach to describe Commission) over the last several decades of Canada’s and analyze the CRTC’s regulation of its conventional, broadcasting legislation and its own regulations. Estab- over-the-air radio licensees from 1968 to 2005. lished by Parliament in 1968, the CRTC is a quasi-judi- This paper concludes that the CRTC uses informal cial regulatory agency that administers Canada’s Broad- sanctions, rather than the penalties set out by Parliament casting Act, 1991 2 as well as the nation’s in Canada’s broadcasting legislation, and that the telecommunications legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Association of Broadcasters
    January 11, 2019 The Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review Panel c/o Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada 235 Queen Street, 1st Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H5 [email protected] Dear Review Panel Members: Re: Call for Comments on the Questions set out in the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review Panel Terms of Reference The Canadian Association of Broadcasters CEO Radio Council (CAB Radio Council or Council) is pleased to provide the enclosed written submission in response to the Review Panel’s Call for Comments on Canada’s Communications Legislative Framework. The CAB Radio Council is a special committee of the CAB whose primary purpose is to advocate on behalf of the private commercial radio industry on matters of national interest which affect radio’s competitiveness and ability to serve Canadians. The council is comprised of representatives from more than 500 AM and FM radio stations across Canada which comprise in aggregate over 95% of total radio industry revenues. The attached submission represents the consensus view of the CAB Radio Council in respect of legislative and policy matters raised by the questions relating to the Broadcasting Act and relevant to radio. We trust that our comments are of value to the Panel and would be pleased to provide any additional input should it be requested. As the CRTC is an important stakeholder in this process and our submission raises radio policy issues not dependent on legislative review, we are also providing a copy of our submission to the Secretary General. Yours truly, Ian Lurie Chair, CAB CEO Radio Council cc.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Stories, Our Voice Campaign
    Our ​Stories​,​ Our ​Voice Campaign to create and share educational and entertaining Canadian content to a bi-national audience Canadians have important stories to tell about our own remarkable history, our first class cultural institutions, and who we are as a people. But who will support this storytelling, and how should it be disseminated? Bringing Canadian narratives to a broader audience is of utmost importance. A creative strategy is required to develop, inform, and promote what is distinctly Canadian not only to Canada but beyond geographic borders. The potential exists for CCPTA to promote richer, more meaningful content about the Canadian experience, as well as use its history of collaboration with Buffalo Toronto Public Media to distribute that content through affiliated NPR and PBS stations. Funding is needed to support the necessary research, development, and production costs that will make this content a reality. 1 You can help to give Canadians a voice! By creating and delivering uniquely Canadian content, we can more effectively educate the world about what it means to be Canadian. Through compelling partnerships with organizations such as Buffalo Toronto Public Media, CCPTA has valuable access to PBS, NPR and other educational television and radio outlets. Why partner with PBS and NPR affiliates to disseminate Canadian stories beyond our borders? 2 The Our Stories, Our Voice Campaign The Central Canadian Public Television Association (CCPTA), has launched the​ Our Stories, Our Voice​ $5 million dollar endowment campaign that will strengthen our educational objectives and expand our gateway for Canadian content producers. The annual income disbursed from the endowment will support the research and development of Canadian focused television productions as well as fund writers and producers to assist in bringing that content to a broad audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Content in the Media C
    9.1.5 Canadian Content in the Media c A cartoon that appeared in 1998 in the Regina Leader-Post during the free trade debate showed a sloppy, middle-aged Canadian wearing a Miami Vice T-shirt, walking down a street adorned with McDonald’s arches, Coke machines, GM and Ford dealerships, and a movie billboard advertising Rambo XI. “What’s really scary,” he says to his wife, “is that we Canadians could lose control of our culture.” From The Mass Media in Canada by Mary Vipond. Canadian content rules considered insufficient by Graham Fraser, Toronto Star, August 29, 2002 <www.friends.ca/News/Friends_News/archives/articles08290205.asp> A recent survey found Canadians are confident the country's culture and identity are stronger now than they were five years ago in terms of distinctiveness from the United States. However, they worry about the ability to control domestic affairs from U.S. pressure in the future. A strong majority believes in Canadian content requirements and do not consider them vigorous enough. They say the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is important for maintaining and building culture and identity. This support for Canadian culture and the CBC emerged in a poll by Ipsos-Reid for Friends of Canadian Broadcasting that was conducted between Aug. 6 and 11, 2002. The poll questioned 1,100 Canadians, and it can be considered accurate within plus or minus 3 percent, 19 times out of 20, Chris Martyn of Ipsos-Reid said. When questioned about agreement with the statement "I am proud of Canadian culture and identity," 94 percent said they agreed, while 92 percent said Canadian culture and identity should be promoted more, and 89 percent agreed it was important that the Canadian government work to maintain and build a culture and identity distinct from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Content Regulations and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1986, 11 (I),41 - 53. CANADIAN CONTENT REGULATIONS AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Brenda M. McPhail The University of Calgary This article examines the Canadian content regulations for television in the context of s. 2(b) of the Charter of Riahts and Freedoms. It araues that on the basis of s. 1, these regulations may be demonstrably justified. Cet article examine les reglements concernent le contenu canadien de la thlevision canadienne dans le contexte de la s. 2(b) de la Charte Canadienne des Droits et LibertBs. I1 demontre que les rhglements sont justifiable B la lumihre de la s. 1. On 17 April 1982 Queen Elizabeth I1 proclaimed the Constitution Act 1982 the supreme law of Canada. Its coming into force was heralded by many as the long-awaited and dramatic severance of the colonial mbi lical cord with Britain. Others, however, were more circumspect, for included in the act was the Canadian Charter of Rights and Free- doms. This novel element in Canada's constitution led to much specu- lation about its effects on Canadian jurisprudence and on the nation as a whole. This article investigates the possible implications of the Charter in one significant sphere of government regulatian . More specifically: do the Canadian television content regulations, as prescribed by the Canadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commission under the authority granted it by the Parliament of Canada in the Broadcasting Act 1968, violate s.2(b) of the Charter, the guarantee of freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, includ- ing freedom of the press and other media of comnunication? Second, if they do, can these regulations be justified by invok ing s The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject to only such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Everywhere (2): Securing Canada’S Place in the Digital Future
    Content Everywhere (2): Securing Canada’s Place in the Digital Future White Paper by Duopoly February, 2015 1 1 Table of Contents – Content Everywhere 2 1. Content Everywhere 2: Securing Canada’s Place in the Digital Future Introduction: a. Scope of the White Paper b. 'Videofication' of the Internet Takes Hold c. The Great Unbundling d. Canada Follows Suit e. What’s Different? Note: This paper has been prepared with the input of many entertainment and 2. What are the Major Trends? media industry leaders, listed in Appendix B. The authors thank these a. The US Leads the Way individuals for their contribution to this study. b. OTTs Surging Buying Power c. More Players Jump Into the Digital-First Game Funding for this study was provided by Ontario Media Development d. Smaller Players Pioneer Original Content Corporation, the Canada Media Fund and the Independent Production e. Old Media Races to Catch Up Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the 3. Preliminary Findings From Industry Reviews views of Ontario Media Development Corporation, Canada Media Fund, the Government of Ontario or the Government of Canada, or the Independent 4. Case Studies Production Fund. The funders, the Governments of Ontario and Canada and a. Canada: Annedroids; Out With Dad; Bite on Mondo; CBC ComedyCoup; their agencies are in no way bound by the recommendations contained in b. US: East Los High; Frankenstein MD; Marco Polo this document. c. UK: Ripper Street; Portal; The Crown Version disponible en français dans trends.cmf-fmc.ca/fr 5.
    [Show full text]
  • MONIQUE T. LAFONTAINE Graduate Programme in Law North York
    Foreign Ownership, Television Broadcasting and Canadian Culture: an Appeal for Increased Liberalization of the Foreign Ownership Restrictions MONIQUE T. LAFONTAINE A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Graduate Programme in Law York University North York, Ontario May 1999 National Library Bibliotheque nationale IN .canad du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, we Wellington OttawaON KtAON4 OttawaON KtAON4 Canada Canada Your 1V. Vatre mMnnar Our 61o Notre retbronte The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliotheque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduke, pr$ter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fd.m, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format electronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriete du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protege cette these. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent Stre imprimes reproduced without the author' s ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Foreign Ownership. Television Broadcasting and Canadian Culture: A.Appeal for Increased Liberalization of the Foreign Ownership Restrictions Monique Laf'ontaine a thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws @ 1998 Permission has been granted to the LIBRARY OF YORK UNIVERSITY to lend or self copies of this thesis, to the NATIONAL LIBRARY OF CANADA to microfilm this thesis and to tend or sell copies of the film, and to UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS to publish an abstract of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Costs of Industrial Growth in the Subarctic Regions Of
    Western University Scholarship@Western University of Western Ontario - Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository May 2015 The oS cial Costs of Industrial Growth in the Sub- Arctic Regions of "Canada" Caylee T. Cody The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Anton Allahar The University of Western Ontario Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Health Policy Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Infrastructure Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Policy Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Regional Sociology Commons, Rural Sociology Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Cody, Caylee T., "The ocS ial Costs of Industrial Growth in the Sub-Arctic Regions of "Canada"" (2015). University of Western Ontario - Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 2820. This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Western Ontario - Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]