DOCSLIB.ORG

Culture In, for and As Sustainable Development. Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Culture In, for and As Sustainable Development. Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development CONCLUSIONS FROM THE COST ACTION IS1007 INVESTIGATING CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY 1 Katriina Soini - [email protected] | Joost Dessein - [email protected] EDITED BY Joost Dessein, Katriina Soini, Graham Fairclough and Lummina Horlings 2 Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability Edited by Joost Dessein, Katriina Soini, Graham Fairclough and Lummina Horlings 3 COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural First published 2015 by University of Jyväskylä Sustainability Editors: Joost Dessein, Katriina Soini, Graham Fairclough and Lummina Horlings Main authors: Katriina Soini, Elena Battaglini, Inger Birkeland, Nancy Duxbury, Graham Fairclough, Lummina Horlings and Joost Dessein Authors of the stories: Story 1: Christiaan De Beukelaer, Julija Matejić, Lummina Horlings and Nancy Duxbury; Story 2: Theopisti Stylianou-Lambert, Marina Mihailova, Paola Spinozzi, Annalisa Cicerchia, Jenny Johannisson, Anita Kangas, Miloslav Lapka, Milena Sesic -Dragicevic, Katriina Siivonen and Astrid Skjerven; Story 3: Inger Birkeland, Katarzyna Plebanczyck, Goran Tomka, Oliver Bender, Maria Leus and Hannes Palang; Story 4: Constanza Parra, Robert Burton, Claudia Brites, Jenny Atmanagara, Elena Battaglini, Mari Kivitalo, Nina Svane-Mikkelsen and Katriina Soini; Story 5: Nathalie Blanc, Raquel Freitas, Maria Cadarso, Svetlana Hristova, Marion Lang, Roberta Chiarini, Eva Cudlinov and Mario Reimer. Authors of text boxes are specified in each box Graphic Design and Artworks: Minja Revonkorpi | Taidea This publication should be cited as: Dessein, J., Soini, K., Fairclough, G. and Horlings, L. (eds) 2015. Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development. Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability. University of Jyväskylä, Finland. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. ISBN: 978-951-39-6177-0 4 COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability 5 COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability Investigating Cultural Sustainability is a Eu- Action Investigating Cultural Sustainability in ropean research network focused in a mul- its four years organised eight workshops or tidisciplinary perspective on the relationship symposiums hosted by its members across between culture and sustainable develop- Europe, and a cross-cutting meeting was or- ment. During its four year period (2011-2015) ganised in Brussels for stakeholders in or- its main objective was to highlight European der to collate and produce new knowledge research across its members’ countries in with the help of external experts, scholars, order to provide policy makers with instru- policy-makers and practitioners. Over 30 ments for integrating culture as a key ele- research missions between the research in- ment of the sustainable development. Ac- stitutes were carried out by members of the tion’s network was composed of around 100 Action, and two training schools were organ- researchers from 25 countries within the EU, ised to strengthen the topic among the young with participants as well from Israel, New researchers working in this field. A key out- Zealand and Australia. It held a wide variety come of the Action was the establishment of of disciplines and fields of research, rang- a new series of books that establish culture ing from cultural, humanistic and social sci- and sustainability as an important emerging ences, through political and natural sciences and active field of research. Published as to planning. These were organised in three ‘Routledge Studies in Culture and Sustain- thematic clusters – Concepts, Policies and able Development’, the series has been in- Assessments – which are broadly reflected augurated by three volumes of papers drawn in the structure of this document. from and representative of the work of the Action itself. The work of the network was supported by the European COST Association (COpera- The results of the work – including the pub- tion in Science and Technology) and funded lication of the present document, ‘Culture in, within the European Commission’s research for and as Sustainable Development’ - were programme Horizon 2020. COST Actions are shared and discussed in a final public confer- designed to build new knowledge by bringing ence in Helsinki on 6-8 May 2015, ‘Culture(s) together researchers to cooperate and coor- in Sustainable Futures: theories, policies, dinate nationally-funded research activities, practices’. and to build up new transnational and inter- national research co-operation. The funding provides an opportunity for researchers to www.culturalsustainability.eu develop their competences, share experi- www.cost.eu ence and expertise with colleagues in other countries, and improve their research career through workshops, training and exchange programs. 6 Pictures by Joost Dessein 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It should be obvious that culture matters to sus- into a framing, contextualising and mediating tainable development. Yet almost 30 years af- mode, one that can balance all three of the ter the Brundtland report ‘Our Common Future’ existing pillars and guide sustainable develop- the incorporation of culture into sustainability ment between economic, social, and ecologi- debates seems to remain a great challenge, cal pressures and needs. Third, we argue that both scientifically and politically. There have there can be an even a more fundamental role been some recent attempts to bring culture into for culture (‘culture as sustainable develop- sustainability, by trans- and inter-national or- ment’) which sees it as the essential foundation ganisations and by cross/trans-disciplinary sci- and structure for achieving the aims of sustain- entific endeavours, but they continue to swim able development. In this role it integrates, co- against the prevailing current of conventional ordinates and guides all aspects of sustainable sustainability discourses rooted in environmen- action. In all three roles, recognising culture as tal and economic perspectives. at the root of all human decisions and actions, and as an overarching concern (even a new Culture, sustainability and sustainable develop- paradigm) in sustainable development thinking, ment are complicated concepts that are not al- enables culture and sustainability to become ways easy for scientists, policy makers or prac- mutually intertwined so that the distinctions be- titioners to grasp or apply. In the course of our tween the economic, social and environmental four-year (2011-15) COST Action, IS1007 In- dimensions of sustainability begin to fade. vestigating Cultural Sustainability, we explored all three concepts and learnt to embrace their Our second chapter, ‘Culture at the crossroads multiple meanings and connotations. In this fi- of policy’, identifies a number of different top- nal report from the Action we present their di- ics, fields or themes that are commonly – or versity and plurality as a meaningful resource should be – addressed by policies, and the for building a comprehensive analytical frame- streams or flows of thought and action that work for the structured study and application of they follow; we liken them to ‘scripts’ that guide ‘culture and sustainable development’. Our con- the performance of sustainability. These scripts clusions are presented in three chapters, after reveal the broad contours of a new type of pol- a Prologue to set the scene and followed by a icy landscape. We explore eight overlapping reflective and forward looking Epilogue. themes: the negotiation of memories, identi- Our first chapter offers our view of key con- ties and heritage; the relevance of place, land- cepts, and presents the three important ways scape and territory; the complexities of social we identify for culture to play important roles life, commons and participation; the centrality in sustainable development. First, culture can of creative practices and activities; culturally have a supportive and self-promoting role sensitive policies for economic development; (which we characterise as ‘culture in sustain- nature conservation; the importance of increas- able development’). This already-established ing awareness and knowledge of sustainability; approach expands conventional sustainable and finally, policies aiming at transformations. development discourse by adding culture as a Our analysis reveals that culture is not just the self-standing 4th pillar alongside separate eco- subject or object of cultural policy; it should logical, social, and economic considerations also inform and be integrated with all other and imperatives. We see a second role (‘culture policies, for the economic, the social and the for sustainable development’), however, which environmental, and for the global and the local. offers culture as a more influential force that All the best and most successful policies are 8 can operate beyond itself. This moves culture (although not necessarily consciously) culturally informed. Policies dealing with education, tour- low cultural statistics to be consistently con- ism, research, cultural diplomacy, social poli- structed and made useful, although we also cies, and city and regional planning, as well as recognise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Policy Paper
    UCLG-MEWA COMMITTEE ON CULTURE & TOURISM POLICY PAPER Background The UCLG-MEWA Committee on Culture, which was initially carrying out its activities as a working group, was established with the decision taken during the UCLG-MEWA Executive Bureau and Council Joint Meeting held in December 2013 in Konya. UCLG-MEWA Committee on Tourism was established during the UCLG-MEWA Executive Bureau and Council Joint Meeting on November 13, 2015. During the UCLG-MEWA Congress to be held on 9-10 July 2019 in Amman, Jordan, it is envisaged to merge the committees under one single roof. The immovable cultural heritage, especially the tangible and intangible cultural treasure and the Middle East and West Asia region, have a great tourism potential. According to the records of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Middle East is composed of 19 countries that have ratified the World Convention on the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage. In UNESCO's survey of 19 countries in the Middle East region, 82 properties were recorded in the World Heritage List. Each year, the World Heritage Committee conducts field research to examine the current status of these works. Within the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), countries in the area covered by UCLG-MEWA have become members to promote tourism and promote their civilization to the world. The UCLG-MEWA Committee on Culture and Tourism, together with currently 62 member municipalities, municipal associations and foundations under its umbrella, aims to create collaborations and build bridges at the local level by creating projects for the protection of local culture in the region, promoting local tourism and finding permanent solutions to existing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture 21 Actions
    Culture 21: Actions ACTIONS Commitments on the role of culture in sustainable cities In Bilbao, at the fi rst Culture Summit To highlight the interdependent of the international organization United relationship between citizenship, ENGLISH Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), culture, and sustainable development. 18-20 March 2015, municipal and local government representatives from To provide an international framework across the world, adopt “Culture 21: supported by commitments and actions that are both achievable and Actions”, with the following aims: measurable. To complement the Agenda 21 for culture adopted in 2004, making it more effective. To harness the role of cities and local governments as authorities in the development and implementation of policies with, and for, citizens. To contribute to the defi nition and importance of the essential role of culture in the United Nations Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda. Introduction ENGLISH At the dawn of this, the twenty-fi rst century, we know that development can only be “sustainable” if culture is given a central role. Human development is defi ned by the expansion of the freedoms and capabilities of all, and this process is only sustainable when it respects the rights and freedoms of future generations. Human development can only be effective if we explicitly consider the integral value to the process of culture and cultural factors such as memory, creativity, diversity, and knowledge. Global debates in the 21st century have recognized the importance of cultural diversity in shaping our world. Cultures forge dynamic and interactive relationships between people and their environments. By defi ning human rights as a starting point, today, all cultures want to be recognized as active participants in development, and to contribute, in their own unique way, to sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agenda for the EU Partnership on Culture / Cultural Heritage Final Action Plan
    Final Action Plan Urban Agenda for the EU Partnership on Culture / Cultural Heritage Final Action Plan *** The Pact of Amsterdam states that the Action Plan "can be regarded as non-binding". Therefore, the Actions presented in this Action Plan are not compulsory. *** DEFINITIONS Actions: should address a real need: an important issue, have real and visible impact and concern a larger number of Member States and cities; Actions should be new: no ‘recycling’ of elements which have already been done or which would be done anyway; Actions should be ready to be implemented: Clear, detailed and feasible; a study or a Working Group or a network is not considered an Action. Recommendations: are meant to suggest good policies, good governance or good practices examples which could be used for inspiration. For instance, these can be projects that have already been implemented and that are considered successful. The aim of such recommendations is to encourage their mainstreaming (implementation at a wider scale) and transfer (implementation in more Member States and cities). Responsible: is meant the institution (EU/national/local) to who the Action is addressed. It is not specifically any of the members of the Partnerships. To describe why one institution should be responsible means that the Partnership wen into the analysis of the Action and reached the conclusion that an Action fits the purpose. Deadline: refers to the timeframe where the Action should take place in order to be meaningful. A deadline refers to a specific calendar. Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Information Practices and Ischools Education
    Cultural Heritage Information Practices and iSchools Education for Achieving Sustainable Development KOYA, Kushwanth <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-1116> and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/24821/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version KOYA, Kushwanth and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda (2019). Cultural Heritage Information Practices and iSchools Education for Achieving Sustainable Development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Cultural heritage information practices and iSchools education for achieving sustainable development Dr Kushwanth Koya1 & Prof Gobinda Chowdhury2 1Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK. Email: [email protected] 2iSchool, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 2XE, UK. Email: [email protected] Abstract Since 2015, UNESCO began the process of inculcating culture as part of UN's post-2015 Sustainable (former Millennium) Development Goals, which member countries agreed to achieve by 2030. By conducting a thematic analysis of the 25 UN commissioned reports and policy documents, this research identifies 14 broad cultural heritage information themes that need to be practised in order to achieve cultural sustainability, of which information platforms, information sharing, information broadcast, information quality, information usage training, information access, information collection and contribution appear to be the significant themes. An investigation of education on cultural heritage informatics and digital humanities at iSchools (www.ischools.org) using a gap analysis framework demonstrates the core information science skills required for cultural heritage education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthology of Culture 21 Documents
    THE ANTHOLOGY OF CULTURE 21 DOCUMENTS CULTURE 21: ACTIONS CULTURE IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ENSURING CULTURE FULFILLS ITS POTENTIAL IN RESPONDING TO THE COVID-19 THE 2020 ROME CHARTER THE ANTHOLOGY OF CULTURE 21 DOCUMENTS CULTURE 21: ACTIONS CULTURE IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ENSURING CULTURE FULFILLS ITS POTENTIAL IN RESPONDING TO THE COVID-19 THE 2020 ROME CHARTER December 2020 This anthology has been compiled by UCLG-MEWA Committee on Culture and Tourism from the documents below in collaboration with the Secretariat of UCLG Culture Committee. Culture 21 Actions was approved on 18-20 March 2015 in Bilbao, in the framework of the first UCLG Culture Summit. The document supplements the Agenda 21 for Culture, transforms it into concrete commitments and actions, and renews the leadership of UCLG on culture and sustainable development. Culture 21 Actions is the result of 18 months of in-depth consultation led by the UCLG Culture Committee with members and partners. Culture in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Guide for Local Action was launched in May 2018 by the UCLG Culture Committee. The first draft of the Guide was discussed at the second UCLG Culture Summit organised in Jeju on 10-13 May 2017. The Guide is structured on the basis of the 17 SDGs and presents information that helps to understand why culture is relevant to achieve each one of the Goals. Ensuring Culture Fulfills its Potential in Responding to the Covid-19 Pandemic statement is framed in the commitment of the #Culture2030goal campaign to the 2030 Agenda and the need to guarantee culture is at the heart of the UN Decade of Action for the SDGs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maps That Shape the Roads. on the Place of Cultural Policy Actors in the Debate on the Sustainable Development of Cities 1
    JORDI PASCUAL The maps that shape the roads. On the place of cultural policy actors in the debate on the sustainable development of cities 1 A paradigm that exists, whether we like it or not Those responsible for drawing up, implementing and evaluating policies, who we could call cultural policy actors, have a duty to choose the paradigms that frame their work. Today, that difficult task cannot avoid the paradigm of sustainable development. The paradigm of sustainable development or sustainability2 was defined by the report »Our Common Future«, also known as the Brundtland Report, the result of the work of the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), and by the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (UNGA 1992). These documents enshrined three pillars as the paradigm to be used in local, national and global strategies: econo- mic, social and environmental. In fact, they added a third pillar to the previous pa- radigm, which had been considered appropriate for most of the 20th century, thus proving that paradigms adapt to the historical capacity to understand realities. The current three-pillar paradigm summarises the »model of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future gener- ations to meet their own needs«. The three pillars, dimensions or components are far from unambiguous. Reality is more complex than models: this is a well-known challenge in social and human sciences. But some modelling is needed if we want to understand and transform our societies. The bitter reality is that culture is absent from this triangular paradigm. As Raj Isar (2017) has recently noted, the authors who coined the current definition of 1 Basis of this article ist the speech hold on the 16th of June 2017 at the 9th Federal Congress on Cultural Policy »World.Culture.Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Soviet Cultural Policy: Cybernetics and Governance in Lithuania After World War II, 2008
    EGLė RINDZEVIčIūtė IS AFFILIATED WITH TEMA Q, (CULTURE STUDIES) AT THE DEPARTMENT FOR STUDIES OF SOCIAL CHANGE AND CULTURE, LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY, AND THE BALTIC & EAST EUROPEAN GRADUATE SCHOOL AT SÖDERTÖRN CONSTRUCTING UNIVERSITY COLLEGE (SÖDERTÖRNS HÖGSKOLA). THIS IS HER DOCTORAL DISSERTATION. SOVIET CULTURAL CYBERNETICS AND POLICY GOVERNANCE IN LITHUANIA AFTER WORLD WAR II EGLė rINDZEVIčIūtė LINKÖPING STUDIES IN ARTS AND SCIENCE NO. 437 TEMA Q (CULTURE STUDIES) LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT FOR STUDIES OF SOCIAL CHANGE ISBN 978-91-7393-879-2 (LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY) ISSN 0282-9800 AND CULTURE ISBN 978-91-89315-92-1 (SÖDERTÖRNS HÖGSKOLA) SÖDERTÖRN DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS 31 LINKÖPING 2008 ISSN 1652-7399 Constructing Soviet Cultural Policy Cybernetics and Governance in Lithuania after World War II Egl Rindzeviit Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 437 Tema Q (Culture Studies) Linköping University, Department for Studies of Social Change and Culture Linköping 2008 Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 437 At the Faculty of Arts and Science at Linköpings universitet, research and doc- toral studies are carried out within broad problem areas. Research is organized in interdisciplinary research environments and doctoral studies mainly in gradu- ate schools. Jointly, they publish the series Linköping Studies in Arts and Sci- ence. This thesis comes from the Department of Culture Studies (Tema kultur och samhälle, Tema Q) at the Department for Studies of Social Change and Culture (ISAK). At the Department of Culture Studies (Tema kultur och samhälle, Tema Q), culture is studied as a dynamic field of practices, including agency as well as structure, and cultural products as well as the way they are produced, consumed, communicated and used.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture in the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda: a Report by the Culture 2030 Goal Campaign
    CULTURE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2030 AGENDA: A REPORT BY THE CULTURE 2030 GOAL CAMPAIGN international council on monuments and sites TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1_INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1_Background and Purpose of the Report .................................................................................................................... 9 1.2_Culture in Sustainable Development .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1_How Culture is Defined ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2_Culture at Intergovernmental Level: UN and UNESCO Policies ............................................................... 11 1.2.3_We Are All Committed: Policies and Activities of the Members of this Campaign ............................ 15 1.2.4_The ‘Culture Goal Campaign’ Re-energized ................................................................................................... 20 2_REVIEW OF PROGRESS TO ACHIEVE THE SDGS, 2015-19 ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURE and SUSTAINABLE CITIES BILBAO 18-20 March 2015 the SUMMIT
    UCLG CULTURE SUMMIT CULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE CITIES BILBAO 18-20 March 2015 THE SUMMIT The first Culture Summit of UCLG will be hosted by the City of Bilbao (Basque Country, Spain) from the 18-20 March 2015. The UCLG Culture Summit is a new event to promote knowledge-sharing and networking of cities and local governments, recognizing the important place of culture in sustainable cities. It envisages gathering all key stakeholders in the promotion of cultural policies, with special emphasis on cities, local governments, and urban actors. The highlight of the first UCLG Culture Summit will be the presentation of “Culture 21: Actions”, a document that builds on the Agenda 21 for Culture that makes a strong link between culture and sustainable development, while providing guides to self-assessment and implementation. “Culture 21: Actions” recommends further expertise, peer-learning, and exchanges. The UCLG Culture Summit is oriented towards creating a full global learning experience among participants. It will feature good practices of Agenda 21 for culture. It will showcase the best projects of the first edition of the “International Award UCLG - Mexico City – Culture 21”. Additionally, the results of the Pilot Cities programme will be presented. The Summit will also connect the UN Post-2015 Development Agenda and culture, building on the work carried out in the process of defining the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly #culture2015goal and #UrbanSDG. It will be an occasion to exchange with the international community and UN Agencies as well as civil society organizations. The first UCLG Culture Summit will have six plenary sessions, devoted to • Opening: why culture and sustainable cities? • Cultural rights in the city • The place of culture in the Sustainable Development Goals • Culture and local development: the key Commitments • Closing: how to operationalize culture in sustainable cities? In addition there will be nine specialised sessions, dedicated to specific topics and aimed at in- depth contact with key actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading Culture in Sustainable Development
    Upgrading Culture in Sustainable Development: The Time is Now 20 /04/2021 15:00-17:00 CEST Organized by: United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) / UN Habitat / Metropolis Partners: The campaign #culture2030goal, Rome City Council and Palaexpo Date: 20 April 2021, 15:00 – 17:00 CEST Please click here to register and receive the link for the session. Streaming on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyFyKFyuUEENtXVLho2KpqA 1. Background Since the founding Congress of Paris, back in 2004, culture has been at the heart of UCLG’s policy agenda. The work of UCLG on Culture in Sustainable Development is structured with conceptual policy documents (such as the “Agenda 21 for culture”, “Culture is the Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development” and the declaration “Culture and Peace”) as well as with practical toolkits and guides, such as the “Culture 21 Actions” and the “Culture in the SDGs: A Guide for Local Action”. In practical terms, the work of UCLG in culture is implemented with the Culture Summit (its 4th edition will take place in Izmir on 9-11 September 2021), the biennial International Award “UCLG – Mexico City – Culture 21”, the database “OBS” of good practices on culture in sustainable cities, the learning and capacity-building programmes to support the implementation of cultural policies (including Leading Cities, Pilot Cities, Culture 21 Lab and the Seven Keys) and its international advocacy in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. The pandemic of Covid-19 has shown the profound need for culture: people have turned to culture to reinforce the sense of belonging in communities and cities, inventing new forms of participation, recognizing what brings us together and creating new meaning and solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change, Culture and Cultural Rights
    Climate Change, Culture and Cultural Rights In Preparation for the Report by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Karima Bennoune Memo / Expanded Outline Prepared by Justine Marrion Massey With contributions from Spring 2020 UN Practicum Students University of California Davis School of Law May 15, 2020 Table of Contents I. Introduction/Overview .................................................................................. 4 a. Introduction to Subject Matter ............................................................................................................. 4 b. Summary of Report, importance of addressing the nexus of climate, culture and human rights ........ 5 c. Inextricable relationship between human rights and health of the environment ................................ 6 i. Culture is reciprocally integrated with ecosystems. ........................................................................... 6 1. Both culture and the environment are crucially place-based. ...................................................................... 7 2. Like the fulfillment of human rights, climate action occurs on both the global and local level. .................. 9 ii. “Climate change impacts human lives and livelihoods, culture and values, and whole ecosystems.” (IPCC, 2018, p. 76) .................................................................................................................................... 9 iii. Human rights impacts due to climate change ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Missing Pillar: Culture's Contribution to the UN Sustainable
    The Missing Pillar Culture’s Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals ©British Council 2020 Contents Foreword 4 Response from United Cities and Local Governments 5 Introduction 7 Section I — Culture and Sustainable Development Goals: a literature review 9 Section II — Analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals through a cultural lens 15 SDG 1: No poverty 17 SDG 1 case study: Cultural Heritage for Inclusive Growth 17 SDG 3: Good health and well-being 19 SDG 3 case study: Golden Thread 20 SDG 4: Quality education 21 SDG 4 case study: Creative Enterprise 22 SDG 5: Gender equality 23 SDG 5 case study: Women of the World 24 SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth 25 SDG 8 case study: Developing Inclusive and Creative Economies 26 SDG 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure 27 SDG 9 case study: Creating Opportunities for South Africa’s Youth 27 SDG 10: Reduced inequalities 28 SDG 10 case study: Transform 28 SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities 29 SDG 11 case study: Cultural Protection Fund 30 SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production 31 SDG 12 case study: Crafting Futures 32 SDG 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions 33 SDG 16 case study: Artivism in the Horn of Africa 33 SDG 17: Partnership for the goals 35 SDG 17 case study: Tfanen Tunisia Creative Programme 36 Section III — Recommendations 37 Conclusion 40 Endnotes 41 Bibliography 45 Programme website links 48 2 Crafting Futures, Thailand ©Simon Mills Foreword 2020 marks five years since the UN 2030 Agenda for I would like to thank Nordicity for their research and mapping; Sustainable Development, the fifteen-year plan to achieve our Culture and Development team and the Research and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), was adopted Evidence teams for making this research happen; and by its 193 members (including the UK).
    [Show full text]