DOCSLIB.ORG

Mcfeely Washington 0250E 19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mcfeely Washington 0250E 19 © Copyright 2019 Savannah Jane Kerr McFeely Clinical Significance and Regulatory Framework for the Evaluation of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B-Based Drug-Drug Interactions Savannah Jane Kerr McFeely A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2019 Reading Committee: Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi, Chair Jashvant Unadkat Bhagwat Prasad Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Pharmaceutics University of Washington Abstract Clinical Significance and Regulatory Framework for the Evaluation of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B-Based Drug-Drug Interactions Savannah Jane Kerr McFeely Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi Department of Pharmaceutics This dissertation research aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the clinical role of organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) 1B1 and 1B3 and the regulatory approach for their evaluation. The work included here has identified the most relevant clinical substrates and inhibitors. Additionally, the contributing factors in the variability of in vitro inhibition constants as well as real-world implications for OATP1B1/1B3 drug-drug interactions are discussed. In Chapter 2, six compounds were identified as potential clinical markers of OATP1B1/1B3 activity through the use of a novel indexing system. These drugs were identified from a list of 34 clinical substrates identified from a thorough analysis of the available in vitro and in vivo data. These findings also suggest that the risk for comedication interactions involve drugs from multiple therapeutic areas showing a reliance on hepatic uptake via the OATP transporters. Chapters 3 seeks to better understand the variability of in vitro inhibition data. By analyzing available OATP1B1/1B3 IC50 values, the primary contributing factors to in vitro variability were identified as the cell system used and inclusion of a preincubation with the inhibitor. The variability of the overall dataset (highest IC50 relative to the lowest) was reduced from 12.35 to 5.23 when both factors were considered. This variability, however, did not directly translate to clinical predictions and the calculated R-values did not show a significant shift relative to the FDA cut-off of 1.1 when these parameters were considered. The goal of Chapter 4 was to identify clinical inhibitors of OATP1B1/1B3 and potential regulatory index drugs. Through the analysis of available clinical and preclinical data, 13 drugs and nine combination treatments were found to be clinical inhibitors. From these clinical inhibitors, two drugs were identified as potential clinical index inhibitors. While no novel index inhibitors were found, this work supports the inclusion of rifampin and cyclosporine as selective and broad-spectrum inhibitors, respectively, and again illustrates the broad range of therapeutic areas that should be considered for comedication studies. The impact of OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition on patients, specifically those in low income countries, is discussed in Chapter 5. As the potent OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor rifampin is part of the recommended treatment regimen for tuberculosis, this chapter evaluated the complexities of DDI management from pharmacological standpoints and illustrated the unique barriers to effective management of DDIs, such as the challenges of co- infection and treatment settings. The use of modeling and simulation techniques are discussed, as they can facilitate the implementation of optimal treatments for infectious diseases at the individual patient level. This dissertation research has improved our understanding of the clinical relevance of OATP1B1/1B3. The implications of the broad-reaching OATP1B1/1B3 interaction profile was discussed using rifampin to illustrate the complications that can arise from comedication scenarios. Overall, this data can be used to improve the evaluation of OATP1B1/1B3 in drug disposition and potentially mitigate the risk of DDIs that could compromise patient safety and drug efficacy. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.2 Expression and Function ............................................................................................. 9 1.1.3 Substrate and Inhibitor Specificity............................................................................ 11 1.1.4 Pharmacogenetics ..................................................................................................... 12 1.1.5 Drug-Drug and Food-Drug Interactions ................................................................... 13 1.1.6 Current Regulatory Perspective ................................................................................ 16 1.2 Hypothesis and Specific Aims ...................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2. Identification and Evaluation of Clinical Substrates of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 ............................................................................................................ 23 2.1 Methods......................................................................................................................... 24 2.1.1 Clinical Substrate Determination .............................................................................. 24 2.1.2 Data Refinement ....................................................................................................... 26 2.1.3 Clinical Substrate Rank Ordering ............................................................................. 27 2.2 Results ........................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.1 In Vitro Substrates of OATP1B1/1B3 ...................................................................... 29 2.2.2 Clinical DDIs Potentially Attributable to OATP1B1/1B3 ....................................... 30 2.2.3 SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 PGx studies ...................................................................... 30 2.2.4 Clinical Impact of OATP1B1/1B3 Inhibition ........................................................... 31 i 2.2.5 Clinical Marker Substrate Identification ................................................................... 33 2.2.6 Comparison of Clinical Substrates to ECCS Classification ..................................... 34 2.3 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 34 Chapter 3. Variability In In Vitro Oatp1B1/1B3 Inhibition Data: Impact Of Incubation Conditions On Variability And Subsequent Drug Interaction Predictions ................................... 47 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 47 3.2 Methods......................................................................................................................... 47 3.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 48 3.3.1 IC50 Variability.......................................................................................................... 48 3.3.2 R-Value Variability ................................................................................................... 50 3.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 4. Inhibitors of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 – Clinical Relevance and Regulatory Perspective ......................................................................................... 73 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 73 4.2 Methods......................................................................................................................... 74 4.2.1 In Vitro Data ............................................................................................................. 74 4.2.2 Clinical DDI Data ..................................................................................................... 74 4.2.3 In Vitro to In Vivo Predictions .................................................................................. 75 4.2.4 Clinical Data Refinement .......................................................................................... 75 4.2.5 Identification of Clinical Index Inhibitors ................................................................ 76 4.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 77 4.3.1 In Vitro Inhibitors of OATP1B1/1B3 ....................................................................... 77 ii 4.3.2 Identification of Clinical Inhibitors of OATP1B1/1B3 ............................................ 78 4.3.3 Clinical Index Inhibitors of OATP1B1/1B3 ............................................................. 80 4.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emtree Terms Changed in January 2017
    Emtree Terms Added and Changed (January 2017) This is an overview of new terms added and changes made in the first Emtree release in 2017. Overall, Emtree has grown by 782 preferred terms (269 drug terms and 513 non-drug terms) compared with the previous version released in September 2016. In total Emtree now counts 75,488 preferred terms. Because the terms added include replacements for existing preferred terms (which become synonyms of the new terms) as well as completely new concepts, the number of terms added exceeds the net growth in Emtree. Other changes could include the merging of two or more existing preferred terms into a single concept. The terms added and changed are summarized below and specified in detail on the following pages. Emtree Terms Added in January 2017 930 new terms (including 148 replacement terms and promoted synonyms) have been added to Emtree as preferred terms in version January 2017 (compared to September 2016): 308 drug terms (terms assigned to the Chemicals and Drugs facet). 622 non-drug terms (terms not assigned as Chemicals and Drugs). The new terms (including the replacement terms and the promoted synonyms) are listed as Terms Added on the following pages. Note that many of these terms will have been indexed prior to 2017 (typically as candidate terms), sometimes for several years, before they were added to Emtree. Emtree Terms Changed in January 2017 148 terms (39 drug terms and 109 non-drug terms) from Emtree September 2016 have been replaced by 148 different terms in January 2017 (39 drug terms and 109 non-drug terms).
    [Show full text]
  • Oncompass Report NÉV Anonymous a Realtime Oncology Molecular Treatment Calculator Számításaival
    FIGYELMEZTETÉS Ezt a tájékoztatót csak a kezelőorvos használhatja és értelmezheti. Az orvos mérlegelheti, vagy figyelmen kívül hagyhatja a jelentés által nyújtott információkat. Az Oncompass Riport információt szolgáltat a tumorok és a molekuláris profil közti összefüggésekről a tudományos irodalom felhasználásával. Az ONCOMPASS Medicine a szakirodalom tartalmáért felelősséget nem vállal. A feltüntetett gyógyszerek az adott tumortípusban lehetnek törzskönyvezettek és/vagy finanszírozottak, annak viszonylatában, hogy a riportot melyik országban használják. AZONOSÍTÓ Oncompass Report NÉV Anonymous A Realtime Oncology Molecular Treatment Calculator számításaival BETEG ADATAI OncompassTM ID: Primer daganat lokalizációja: breast Név: Szövettani típus: invasive carcinoma NST Születési dátum: 1959 Metasztázis lokalizációja: bone, lymph node SZAKÉRTŐK Molekuláris Farmakológus: Dr. Peták István Genetikai Tanácsadó: Déri Júlia, MSc Molekuláris Biológus: Várkondi Edit, PhD Konzulens Orvos: Dr. Pajkos Gábor Szakértő: Dr. Szuszán Marianna Betegút Koordinátor: Czető Réka Info-bionikus Mérnök: Tihanyi Dóra, MSc Molekuláris Bionikus Mérnök: Dirner Anna, MSc PATOLÓGIAI ÉS MOLEKULÁRIS DIAGNOSZTIKAI VIZSGÁLATOK Mintaazonosító: XXX (szövettani minta) Minta eredete: nyirokcsomó metasztázis Tumorarány: 50% Tumortípus: invazív ductális emlő carcinoma Elvégzett vizsgálatok: IHC - PD-L1 normál expresszió MSI - MSS TMB - magas: 6,44 mut/Mb NGS - 591 gén Korábbi molekuláris vizsgálatok eredménye: IHC - ER, PR, HER2 normál expresszió IHC - PD-L1 overexpresszió (>1%)
    [Show full text]
  • Orally Active Compound Library (96-Well)
    • Bioactive Molecules • Building Blocks • Intermediates www.ChemScene.com Orally Active Compound Library (96-well) Product Details: Catalog Number: CS-L061 Formulation: A collection of 2244 orally active compounds supplied as pre-dissolved Solutions or Solid Container: 96- or 384-well Plate with Peelable Foil Seal; 96-well Format Sample Storage Tube With Screw Cap and Optional 2D Barcode Storage: -80°C Shipping: Blue ice Packaging: Inert gas Plate layout: CS-L061-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a Empty Vonoprazan Mivebresib AZD0156 BAY-876 Tomivosertib PQR620 NPS-2143 R547 PAP-1 Delpazolid Empty Varenicline b Empty Varenicline (Hydrochlorid Varenicline A-205804 CI-1044 KW-8232 GSK583 Quiflapon MRK-016 Diroximel Empty e) (Tartrate) fumarate SHP099 c Empty A 922500 SHP099 (hydrochlorid Nevanimibe Pactimibe Pactimibe GNF-6231 MLi-2 KDM5-IN-1 PACMA 31 Empty e) hydrochloride (sulfate) Rilmenidine d Empty Cadazolid Treprostinil GSK3179106 Esaxerenone (hemifumarat Rilmenidine Fisogatinib BP-1-102 Avadomide Aprepitant Empty e) (phosphate) Cl-amidine AZD5153 (6- e Empty Maropitant Abscisic acid (hydrochlorid BGG463 WNK463 Ticagrelor Axitinib Hydroxy-2- CGS 15943 Pipamperone Empty e) naphthoic Setogepram Teglarinad f Empty Y-27632 GSK2193874 Lanabecestat CXD101 Ritlecitinib YL0919 PCC0208009 (sodium salt) (chloride) Futibatinib Empty TAK-659 g Empty NCB-0846 GS-444217 (hydrochlorid Navitoclax ABX464 Zibotentan Simurosertib (R)- CEP-40783 MK-8617 Empty e) Simurosertib Choline JNJ- h Empty CCT251236 (bitartrate) Sarcosine Brensocatib AS-605240 PF-06840003
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Estrogen on Host-Pathogen Interactions in Ex Vivo and in Vitro Models of the Inflammatory Phase
    Effect of Estrogen on Host-Pathogen Interactions in ex vivo and in vitro Models of the Inflammatory Phase of Age-Related Impaired Healing A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Mohamed El Mohtadi Department of Life Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University 2019 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………………………………VI List of Figures………………………………………………………………………….……………………..X List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………………….XIII Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………XIV Declaration and Copyright Statements…………………………………………………………..XVI The Author…………………………………………………………………………………………………….XVII Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………………...XVIII Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………………………..XX : Introduction .................................................................................... 1 1.1 Acute Wound Healing ..................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Haemostasis ................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Inflammatory Phase ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Proliferative Phase ......................................................................................................... 8 ECM Formation ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • New Therapies for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancers ~200,000 Women in the USA Are Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Charles M. Perou, PhD Computational Medicine Program, Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA New Therapies for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancers ~200,000 women in the USA are living with metastatic breast cancer 2015- original breast cancer We have the 2015 tumor for testing and “precision medicine” However… The 2015 tumor is not the problem, the 2019 tumors are. 2019 - metastasis in liver, brain Slide courtesy of Lisa Carey Cancers Evolve over time and space Diagnosis First Normal breast metastasis cells Cancer cells (orange) (green) mutations Later metastasis chronologic time These are not the same, They differ by a few genetic markers (mutations, amp, delete) Tumor Evolution in Two Patients with Basal-like Breast Cancer: a Retrospective Genomics Study of Multiple Metastases. Hoadley, Siegel, et al., PLoS Medicine, 2016 (PMID:27923045) 2 clones 2 clones = “polyclonal seeding” 2 clones Metastasis Variant Variant Metastasis Allele Frequency Lung Primary Tumor Variant Allele Frequency Frequency Allele Variant Metastasis l Adrena Liver Metastasis Variant Allele Frequency UNC Breast Tumor Donation Program (Lisa Carey – PI) 65 patients at UNC participated so far Detailed genetics (DNA)(DNA) and genomics (RNA expression) on the primary tumor and multiple metastases.metastases. Key Findings: • Many cancers include multiple “subcancers / subclones”. • Polyclonal seeding by multiple subclones is common • Each subclone has some different genetic alterations. • Which alterations are genetic drivers? • Which alterations to therapeutically target? AURORA US Metastasis Project Primary goal • To identify the molecular features responsible for the development and progression of metastatic breast cancer, including the development of resistance to therapy Multi-platform genomic analysis of 250 metastatic breast cancer pairs (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Unexpected Impact of a Hepatitis C Virus Inhibitor on 17Β-Estradiol Signaling in Breast Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Unexpected Impact of a Hepatitis C Virus Inhibitor on 17β-Estradiol Signaling in Breast Cancer Stefania Bartoloni, Stefano Leone and Filippo Acconcia * Department of Sciences, Section Biomedical Sciences and Technology, University Roma Tre, Viale Guglielmo Marconi, 446, I-00146 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (S.L.) * Correspondence: fi[email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-57336320; Fax: +39-06-57336321 Received: 29 April 2020; Accepted: 11 May 2020; Published: 12 May 2020 Abstract: 17β-Estradiol (E2) controls diverse physiological processes, including cell proliferation, through its binding to estrogen receptor α (ERα). E2:ERα signaling depends on both the receptor subcellular localization (e.g., nucleus, plasma membrane) and intracellular ERα abundance. Indeed, the control of ERα levels is necessary for the effects of E2, and E2 itself induces ERα degradation and cell proliferation in parallel. Thus, the modulation of intracellular ERα levels is a critical parameter for E2-induced cell proliferation. Therefore, we used this parameter as a bait to identify compounds that influence ERα levels and E2-dependent proliferation in breast cancer (BC) cells from a library of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We found that telaprevir (Tel) reduces ERα levels and inhibits BC cell proliferation. Tel is an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A serine protease, but its effect on E2:ERα signaling has not been investigated. Here, for the first time, we analyzed the effects of Tel on intracellular ERα levels and E2:ERα signaling to cell proliferation in different ERα-expressing BC cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppl. 1 Supplementary Data
    Indones. J. Chem., 2021, 21 (1), 137 - 147 Suppl. 1 Supplementary Data This supplementary data is a part of paper entitled “Ligand Based Pharmacophore Modeling, Virtual Screening, and Molecular Docking Studies of Asymmetrical Hexahydro-2H-Indazole Analogs of Curcumin (AIACs) to Discover Novel Estrogen Receptors Alpha (ERα) Inhibitor”. Table S1.a. The intermediate of designed compound structures No Compound code Structure R1 R2 1 1A H H 2 1B O R1 H CH3 3 1C H Cl 4 1D H F 5 1E R2 H OCH3 6 1F OCH3 OCH3 Table S1.b. The AMACs compound structures No Compound code Structure R1 R2 R3 7 2A H H H O R1 8 2B H CH3 H H3CO 9 2C H Cl H 10 2D H F H HO R2 11 2E H OCH3 H R3 12 2F OCH3 OCH3 H Table S1.c. The AIACs compound structures I No Compound code Structure R1 R2 R3 X 13 3A1 H H H H 14 3A2 H CH3 H H 15 3A3 H Cl H H 16 3A4 X H F H H N N R1 17 3A5 H OCH3 H H H3CO 18 3A6 OCH3 OCH3 H H 19 3A7 H H H phenyl 20 3A8 HO R2 H CH3 H phenyl R 21 3A9 3 H Cl H phenyl 22 3A10 H F H phenyl 23 3A11 H OCH3 H phenyl 24 3A12 OCH3 OCH3 H phenyl Hariyanti et al. Suppl. 2 Indones. J. Chem., 2021, 21 (1), 137 - 147 Table S1.d. The AIACs compound structures II No Compound code Structure R1 R2 R3 X 25 3B1 H H H H 26 3B2 H CH3 H H 27 3B3 H Cl H H 28 3B4 X H F H H N N R1 29 3B5 H OCH3 H H H3CO 30 3B6 OCH3 OCH3 H H 31 3B7 H H H phenyl 32 3B8 HO R2 H CH3 H phenyl R 33 3B9 3 H Cl H phenyl 34 3B10 H F H phenyl 35 3B11 H OCH3 H phenyl 36 3B12 OCH3 OCH3 H phenyl Table S1.e.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/234778 Al 27 December 2018 (27.12.2018) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/234778 Al 27 December 2018 (27.12.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, A61K 31/138 (2006.01) A61K 31/5025 (2006.01) MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, A61K 31/437 (2006.01) 67 57/506 (2006.01) TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, A61K 31/4375 (2006.01) 67 57/57 7 (2006.01) KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). A61K 31/472 {2006.01) 67 57/579 (2006.01) A61K 31/4725 (2006.01) A61K 31/52 (2006.01) Declarations under Rule 4.17: A61K 31/496 {2006.01) A61K 31/565 (2006.01) — of inventorship (Rule 4.1 7(iv)) A61K 31/4985 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) Published: (21) International Application Number: — with international search report (Art. 21(3)) PCT/GB20 18/05 1694 — before the expiration of the time limit for amending the claims and to be republished in the event of receipt of (22) International Filing Date: amendments (Rule 48.2(h)) 19 June 2018 (19.06.2018) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 1709837.7 20 June 2017 (20.06.2017) GB 1806133.3 13 April 2018 (13.04.2018) GB (71) Applicants: THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH: ROYAL CANCER HOSPITAL [GB/GB]; 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP (GB).
    [Show full text]
  • Product Data Sheet
    Product data sheet MedKoo Cat#: 206041 Name: Brilanestrant CAS#: 1365888-06-7 Chemical Formula: C26H20ClFN2O2 Exact Mass: 446.11973 Molecular Weight: 446.9064 Product supplied as: Powder Purity (by HPLC): ≥ 98% Shipping conditions Ambient temperature Storage conditions: Powder: -20°C 3 years; 4°C 2 years. In solvent: -80°C 3 months; -20°C 2 weeks. 1. Product description: Brilanestrant, also known as GDC-0810, ARN-810 and RG6046, an orally bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) that demonstrates robust activity in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer xenografts. GDC-0810 functions by binding to the estrogen receptor, inducing a conformational change resulting in the degradation of the receptor. GDC-0810 or ARN-810 demonstrates robust activity in models of tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, and is currently in clinical trials in women with locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. 2. CoA, QC data, SDS, and handling instruction SDS and handling instruction, CoA with copies of QC data (NMR, HPLC and MS analytical spectra) can be downloaded from the product web page under “QC And Documents” section. Note: copies of analytical spectra may not be available if the product is being supplied by MedKoo partners. Whether the product was made by MedKoo or provided by its partners, the quality is 100% guaranteed. 3. Solubility data Solvent Max Conc. mg/mL Max Conc. mM DMSO 89 199.15 Ethanol 89 199.15 4. Stock solution preparation table: Concentration / Solvent Volume / Mass 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg 1 mM 2.24 mL 11.19 mL 22.38 mL 5 mM 0.45 mL 2.24 mL 4.48 mL 10 mM 0.22 mL 1.12 mL 2.24 mL 50 mM 0.04 mL 0.22 mL 0.45 mL 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lääkeaineiden Yleisnimet (INN-Nimet) 31.12.2019
    Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus Säkerhets- och utvecklingscentret för läkemedelsområdet Finnish Medicines Agency Lääkeaineiden yleisnimet (INN-nimet) 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO INN Proposed List
    WHO Drug Information, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016 Proposed INN: List 115 International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN) Notice is hereby given that, in accordance with article 3 of the Procedure for the Selection of Recommended International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances, the names given in the list on the following pages are under consideration by the World Health Organization as Proposed International Nonproprietary Names. The inclusion of a name in the lists of Proposed International Nonproprietary Names does not imply any recommendation of the use of the substance in medicine or pharmacy. Lists of Proposed (1–113) and Recommended (1–74) International Nonproprietary Names can be found in Cumulative List No. 16, 2015 (available in CD-ROM only). The statements indicating action and use are based largely on information supplied by the manufacturer. This information is merely meant to provide an indication of the potential use of new substances at the time they are accorded Proposed International Nonproprietary Names. WHO is not in a position either to uphold these statements or to comment on the efficacy of the action claimed. Because of their provisional nature, these descriptors will neither be revised nor included in the Cumulative Lists of INNs. Dénominations communes internationales des Substances pharmaceutiques (DCI) Il est notifié que, conformément aux dispositions de l'article 3 de la Procédure à suivre en vue du choix de Dénominations communes internationales recommandées pour les Substances pharmaceutiques les dénominations ci-dessous sont mises à l'étude par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé en tant que dénominations communes internationales proposées.
    [Show full text]