DOCSLIB.ORG

Plataea and the End of the Graeco- Persian Wars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plataea and the End of the Graeco- Persian Wars Paul Cartledge. After Thermopylae: The Oath of Plataea and the End of the Graeco- Persian Wars. Emblems of Antiquity Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Maps, illustrations. xxx + 203 pp. $24.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-19-974732-0. Reviewed by Nikolaus Overtoom Published on H-War (February, 2014) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Paul Cartledge’s After Thermopylae: The Oath umphs at Marathon and Salamis overshadowed of Plataea and the End of the Graeco-Persian the mostly Spartan victory at Plataea. Cartledge’s Wars brings out of relative obscurity one of the book, a contribution to the new Emblems of An‐ most decisive battles of the Graeco-Persian Wars. tiquity series from Oxford University Press, is a Almost everyone has heard of the valiant stand of short work of seven chapters and 167 pages, Leonidas and his three hundred Spartans at Ther‐ much of which is background information on peo‐ mopylae. Similarly, the Athenian defeat of the Per‐ ple, places, and events. He offers two rather gen‐ sians at Marathon and their decimation of the eral maps and a sketch map of the battle; he also Persian feet at Salamis are two of the most cele‐ provides a sprinkling of supplemental pictures. brated events in antiquity. Meanwhile, the Battle His preface is brief but emphasizes his dissatisfac‐ of Plataea, which once and for all removed the tion with the relative obscurity of Plataea.In the threat of Persian dominance over the Greek main‐ introductory chapter, which examines a marble land, is a distant fourth in the hearts and minds of dedication found near Athens, Cartledge rejects ancients and moderns alike. How did this come to the authenticity of “the Oath of Plataea” inscrip‐ be? Cartledge’s work aims to answer this question tion as an oath that was actually sworn before the through a discussion of the rivalry that developed battle. Instead he views it as a piece of Athenian between Sparta and Athens after the wars and the propaganda, the purpose of which was to help subsequent propaganda battle between the two create an Athenian identity and convince others powers. In the war of words that progressed of that identity (hence the large marble stele). Car‐ throughout the ffth and fourth centuries BCE, the tledge describes Athens as a society that devel‐ Athenians were able to outmaneuver the Spartans oped an “epigraphic habit” (p. 5). Part of its demo‐ in the recreation of state memory and the inven‐ cratic culture was to make important texts avail‐ tion of “history.” Ultimately, the Athenian tri‐ able to the public through inscriptions. This par‐ H-Net Reviews ticular stele comes from the middle to late fourth Chapter 3 tackles the religious interpretation century BCE and was dedicated near a religious of the inscription. Cartledge uses examples to il‐ shrine. He describes the oath as a religious offer‐ lustrate that religious oaths were quite common ing to the gods (Ares in particular). He argues that in Greek society and that the gods were thought to those who dedicated this inscription either be‐ watch over oaths and to punish oath breakers. He lieved in its authenticity or wanted others to be‐ argues that by creating the Oath of Plataea, the lieve in its authenticity. Although Plataea was Athenians laid upon themselves a potential reli‐ about as decisive as a battle can be, after the wars gious curse that could incur religious pollution (a it was left to the Athenians and Spartans to fght debilitating stigma in Greek culture). He con‐ over the right to control and create historical cludes that this risk is not surprising because the memory. Cartledge acknowledges that the Atheni‐ Athenians “had a special affinity, and affection, ans were more suited to win a propaganda war for oaths, particularly oaths that fostered amity and clearly did. He argues that “the Oath of and collective endeavor, and particularly in the Plataea thus both vividly illuminates Greek anxi‐ stasis-ridden atmosphere of the fourth century eties over historical memory and reflects the BCE” (p. 58). Athenian and Spartan rivalry that erupted in little His next chapter provides a summary of the under ffty years after the Battle of Plataea” (p. Graeco-Persian Wars and background on the 10). Cartledge uses the oath in the rest of his work Achaemenid Empire. Cartledge reminds his read‐ as a springboard to investigate “what actually er that more Greeks aided the Persians than re‐ happened,” the goals and motivations of Athenian sisted them. He concludes the chapter with a brief propaganda, the invention of self-image, and the account of the Greek resistance to the invasions, oath’s significance as a religious artifact. emphasizing the various divisions between “the His second chapter provides an analysis of Greeks.” He dispels the “overfamiliar, oversim‐ the oath and compares it with two other literary plistic assertions that ‘the Greeks’ defeated ‘the versions. He concludes that although a new or re‐ Persians’ in the ‘Persian Wars’” (p. 87). newed oath of common purpose is plausible be‐ In chapter 5, Cartledge addresses the Battle of fore Plataea in 479 BCE, it is highly unlikely that Plataea more directly with a discussion of the the oath accurately reflects the terms sworn. Yet campaign. He also includes brief discussions of the importance of the oath as evidence is its por‐ the other major battles during the second inva‐ trayal of the process of Athenians from the 380s sion. He offers three key reasons why the Battle of BCE onward creating a “retrospectively tri‐ Plataea is overshadowed: it was a Spartan (in‐ umphalist narrative” (p. 30). Further, he argues stead of an Athenian) victory; Plataea itself was a that the other inscription found on the stele, “the small, insignificant state; and Herodotus’s account Oath of the Ephebes,” was combined with the is brief and lacunose. Oath of Plataea in the hope that these Ephebes Cartledge next discusses the competition that (young Athenian men) “would be inspired to re‐ began between Sparta and Athens to dominate produce the putative glory of their ancestors at the memory of the wars immediately after they Plataea” (p. 39). The stele was a propaganda at‐ were over. The Spartans pushed to glorify Plataea, tempt to link the present and future of Athens while the Athenians lionized Salamis. Athens had with the glorious past. Cartledge hypothesizes that the advantage of using their victory at Marathon the Athenians dedicated the stele after their as a launching pad. Cartledge illustrates that the crushing defeat at Chaeronea in 338 BCE as a way Greek art of memory was highly competitive. The to help soothe such a painful memory. Athenians used public inscriptions, oration, 2 H-Net Reviews prayers, dedications, images, commemorative re‐ ed attention to the redheaded stepchild of the bat‐ ligious festivals, civic and sporting events, plays, tles of the Graeco-Persian Wars. philosophical writings, and histories all in an ef‐ The book appears to have been written with a fort to laud, expand, and advertise their military lay audience in mind, with introductions provid‐ achievements. They set the bar immensely high ed on Athenian government processes, Greek reli‐ for Sparta. The Spartans created poetry and dedi‐ gion, and Herodotus, just to name a few. Car‐ cated commemorative gifts at major Panhellenic tledge’s work provides quite a bit of background shrines. Cartledge concludes the chapter by dis‐ information and explanations of terminology. His cussing the Spartan and Athenian competition prose is ever approachable (apart from the jar‐ through literary sources. Simonides’s poetry rein‐ ring use of contractions), but his notations are se‐ forced the Spartan military ethos. Herodotus, who verely lacking. For example, when he describes Cartledge describes as “basically truth-telling,” is the Spartan delay before the Battle of Plataea, he pretty evenhanded in his account of the rivalry (p. mentions “robust modern criticism” but offers no 145). In the writing of Thucydides the rivalry citation (p. 104). Then in his discussion of scholar‐ grew into the Peloponnesian War, which greatly ly debate over what equipment the Greek soldiers intensified the struggle over the memory of used during the Graeco-Persian Wars, he again of‐ Plataea. Cartledge argues that the Athenians fers no citation (p. 110). There are numerous oth‐ wished to minimize the mainly Spartan victory at er sections throughout the book that would have Plataea by advocating their share in the victory. been aided by notations. Why not at least add an He then states that one further Athenian innova‐ endnotes section for academic use? Cartledge at tion in the propaganda war was the funeral least offers a helpful further reading section and a speech genre, which they used to help advertise a sizable bibliography. heroic past and invent historical memory. Car‐ There are a few more specific issues that need tledge theorizes that the oath emerged out of this attention. Cartledge’s translation of the oath needs genre. He argues that the inscription was meant to be accompanied by the original Greek. I under‐ “to cause Athenian breast to swell with nostalgic stand that a lay audience would just be bogged pride” (p. 157). Finally, in his brief concluding down by the Greek. However, to not include the chapter, Cartledge discusses the legacy of Plataea Greek hampers the book’s usefulness to graduate in the modern world. He argues that there are a students and scholars. Cartledge or the publisher number of contemporary resonances, especially at least could have included the Greek inscription the concept of “the West” versus “the East.” in the back of the book. Further, why use the After Thermopylae is a timely book with news problematic King James Bible as a source of trans‐ that the Hollywood sequel to the smash hit movie lation on page 42? Surely The New Oxford Anno‐ 300 will charge into movie theaters in the spring tated Bible would have been a better and more of 2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and the Philosophy of Empire: Herodotus 9.82
    Food and the Philosophy of Empire: Herodotus 9.82 After the Battle of Plataea, Herodotus relates an anecdote about Pausanias’ reaction to Persian wealth. When he comes across Xerxes’ tent, he has the Persian slaves prepare a typical meal of the Persian elite. He then has his own slaves prepare a traditional Spartan meal. Pausanias is amused at the difference and calls the Greeks together, saying “my purpose in asking you all here is to show you how stupid the Persian king is. Look at the way he lives and then consider that he invaded our country to rob us of our meager portions!” (9.82). Scholarly response to this scene has been two-fold. First, Herodotus has Pausanias set up a display that proves one of the main themes of the Histories: that soft countries should not attack hard ones (Bowie 2003, Vasunia 2009). Second, the scene, along with Pausanias’ laughter, serves to foreshadow Pausanias’ eventual Medizing (Fornara 1971; Lateiner 1989). I propose that Herodotus includes this scene in order to highlight cultural difference and to show that Pausanias takes the wrong lesson from the Persian meal. His misinterpretation foreshadows not only his own downfall, but also problems in how Sparta exercises power. Herodotus creates a strong association between food and power in his presentation of the Persians (Munson 2001). When Croesus wants to attack the Persians, his advisor Sandanis warns him against it because the Persians’ “food consists of what they can get, not what they want” (1.71). If Croesus wins, he will gain nothing from it; but if he loses, he will lose everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Civilisation 1A: Early Greece, from Troy to Plataea, 776-479 B.C. | University of Glasgow
    09/27/21 Classical Civilisation 1A: Early Greece, from Troy to Plataea, 776-479 B.C. | University of Glasgow Classical Civilisation 1A: Early Greece, View Online from Troy to Plataea, 776-479 B.C. 1. Boardman J, Griffin J, Murray O. The Oxford history of Greece and the Hellenistic world. Vol. Oxford history of the classical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. 2. Hornblower S, Spawforth A, Eidinow E. The Oxford classical dictionary. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. 3. Pelling CBR. Literary texts and the Greek historian [Internet]. Vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge; 2000. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203010 273 4. Andrewes A. The Greek tyrants. London: Hutchinson; 1956. 5. Boardman J. The Greeks overseas: their early colonies and trade. 4th ed. London: Thames and Hudson; 1999. 6. 1/15 09/27/21 Classical Civilisation 1A: Early Greece, from Troy to Plataea, 776-479 B.C. | University of Glasgow Burn AR, Lewis DM. Persia and the Greeks: the defence of the West, c.546-478 B.C. 2nd ed., with a postscript by D.M. Lewis. London: Duckworth; 1984. 7. Bury JB, Meiggs R. A history of Greece to the death of Alexander the Great. 4th ed. London: Macmillan; 1975. 8. Ehrenberg V. From Solon to Socrates: Greek history and civilization during the sixth and fifth centuries B.C. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1973. 9. Forrest WGG. The emergence of Greek democracy: the character of Greek politics, 800-400 B.C. Vol. World university library. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle at Plataea Interesting Facts
    Battle at Plataea Reason for Conflict: The Persian Army invaded Athens and there was a lot of back and forth with taking the city. Eventually, the Persians began to invade on the city, forcing the Athenians to evacuate. The Athenian generals went to Sparta and told them that if they didn’t help drive the out of their city that they would join the Persians. The Spartans eventually joined forces with them but arriving in ​ Sparta, the Athenians were surprised to learn that an army was already on the move. Date and Location ­ August 479 BC was the date of the battle ­ was the final land battle during the second persian invasion ­ fought near the city of Plataea in Boeotia ­ Participants: Greek city state alliances which included Sparta, Athens, Corinth, and Megaria Outcome: ­ Persians were defeated by the superior phalanx of the Spartans ­ Athenians captured the Persian camp ­ Persia loses control of Attica and Boeotia ­ The Greeks collected the items they had looted ­ allied Greek fleet defeated the Persian naval army that had landed at Mykale ­ this secured the Greek mainland from Persian invasion, even though the war against Xerxes would continue for a while Interesting Facts: A bronze column in the shape of intertwined snakes (the Serpent column) was created ​ ​ from melted­down Persian weapons, acquired in the plunder of the Persian camp, and was erected at Delphi. I​ t commemorated all the Greek city­states that had participated in ​ ​ ​ the battle. Constantine the Great brought this victory monument to the hippodrome of ​ Constantinople, where it still stands. The column once carried a golden tripod with the ​ inscription, that is dubiously attributed to the poet Simonides: “This is the gift the saviors of far­flung Hellas upraised here, Having delivered their states from loathsome slavery's bonds” People of the battle of Plataea: Xerxes was the king of persia at time of the battle of Plataea, he ruled from 386 bce until his assassination at 465 bce.
    [Show full text]
  • Greco-Persian Wars Comics # # Greco-Persian Wars Comics
    # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Follow along to learn about new terms and create comic strips for the Greco-Persian Wars... # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Fold your blank paper into 8 squares (4x2). When you see the red numbered symbol, fill in one of your eight comic strip boxes with a title, caption and drawing for that slide. Be sure that your titles or captions include all 10 of the key terms listed on the left! 1 Persian Empire 2 Hellenism 3 Mesopotamia 4 Golden Age 5 Greco-Persian Wars 6 Ionian Revolt 7 Darius 8 Xerxes 9 Delian League 10 Asia Minor # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Fold your blank paper into 8 squares (4x2). When you see the red numbered symbol, fill in one of your eight comic strip boxes with a title, caption and drawing for that slide. Be sure that your titles or captions include all 10 of the key terms listed on the left! 1 Persian Empire 2 Hellenism 3 Mesopotamia 4 Golden Age 5 Greco-Persian Wars 6 Ionian Revolt 7 Darius 8 Xerxes 9 Delian League 10 Asia Minor # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Follow along to learn about new terms and create comic strips for the Greco-Persian Wars... 1 Persian Empire had been on the rise 2 Greek kingdoms reach a Golden Age 3 Cyrus appoints tyrants to rule Ionia 4 Greek rebellions across Asia Minor 5 Darius squashes the Ionian revolts 6 Persian plan to crush all of Greece 7 Darius & Xerxes struggle for years 8 Greeks go back on the offensive 1 Greco-Persian Wars Comics 1 1 Persian Empire had been on the rise The Persians originated in what is now Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian Wars
    The Persian Wars Section 1 — Introduction In the 400s B.C.E., the vast Persian Empire extended from the Middle East and northeastern Africa to modern-day Pakistan. The Persians wanted to claim Greece as well. In the 400s B.C.E., the vast Persian Empire extended from the Middle East and northeastern Africa to modern-day Pakistan. The Persians wanted to claim Greece as well. Athens and Sparta were two very different city-states in ancient Greece. Their differences sometimes led to a distrust of each other. But between 499 and 479 B.C.E., these city-states had a common enemy—the Persian Empire. At that time, Persia was the largest empire the world had ever seen. Its powerful kings ruled over lands in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. During the 400s B.C.E., the Persians invaded Greece, and the Persian wars began. To fight the Persians, the Greek city-states eventually joined together as allies. Allies are states that agree to help each other against a common enemy. Compared with Persia, these tiny Greek city-states had much less land and far fewer people. How could they possibly turn back such a powerful invader? In this chapter, you will learn about important battles during the Persian wars and discover who won them. You will also learn about the factors that influenced the outcome of the Persian wars. The Persian Wars Section 2 — The Persian Empire and the Ionian Revolt The Persians started out as a small group of nomads, in what is now Iran. They built a large empire by conquering neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • Herodotus and the 300 at Thermopylae*
    TAPA 146 (2016) 219–236 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 2016 San Francisco, California The Historian as Hero: Herodotus and the 300 at Thermopylae* JOHN MARINCOLA Florida State University I AMONG THE MANY BRILLIANT NARRATIVES TO BE FOUND IN HERODOTUS’S Histories, that of the battle of Thermopylae is surely one of the most famous and most moving. Although scholars have hardly ever thought of Herodotus as a great military historian, he has managed nonetheless to infuse many of his battle narratives with a profound sense of excitement and pathos simul- taneously. The narrative of Thermopylae follows a pattern familiar from Herodotus’s other battle narratives and is, like so much in the first historian, modelled on Homer: the use of prophecy to give a sense of foreboding to the events; the movement between individuals and groups, with the narra- tor now taking the close-up view, now the panoramic; the concentration on individuals, and in particular on worthy or noteworthy actions during the heat of battle; and, finally, an interest in unusual or inexplicable events that occurred before, during, and after the battle. I say “modelled on Homer,” but it is more accurate to say that Herodotus has retained some elements of Homeric battle narrative while doing other things in a very different way.1 * This is a lightly revised version of my 2016 Presidential Address; I have added several additional references but kept the basic format of the talk. In an earlier incarnation it formed part of a larger paper that was given at Colgate University, Middlebury College, the University of Tennessee, and Western Kentucky University.
    [Show full text]
  • Herodotus Book Ix
    HERODOTUS BOOK IX MICHAEL A. FLOWER Franklin & Marshall College JOHN MARINCOLA New York University The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge ,UK West thStreet, New York, -, USA Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, , Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on , Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town , SouthAfrica http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typefaces Baskerville / pt and New Hellenic System LATEX ε [] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Herodotus [History. Book ] Herodotus. Book IX / edited by Michael A. Flower and John Marincola. p. cm. – (Cambridge Greek and Latin classics) Includes bibliographical references and index. (pbk.) . Plataea, Battle of, . I. Flower, Michael A. II. Marincola, John. III. Series. . . –dc hardback paperback CONTENTS List of maps and figures page viii Preface ix Acknowledgements xii List of abbreviations xiii Introduction Life and times Narrative manner and technique Characterisation Historicalmethods and sources The battles of Plataea and Mycale Themes Dialect Manuscripts HRODOTOU ISTORIWN I Commentary Appendixes A Simonides’ poem on Plataea B Dedication of the seer Teisamenus? C The ‘Oath of Plataea’ D Battle Lines of the Greek and Persian armies at Plataea Bibliography Indexes vii MAPS . Plataea page . Samos and Mycale . Battle of Mycale FIGURES . Family tree of Pausanias page .
    [Show full text]
  • 20. Persian Wars
    World History Detective® Book 1 Ancient Civilizations 20. Persian Wars BLACK SEA GREECE GREECE AEGEAN SEA • Troy Thermopylae AEGEAN LYDIAN ASIAN SEA KINGDOM Sardis IONIAN MINOR Athens • Athens Plataea SEA Marathon • Sparta Salamis MEDITERRANEAN SEA CRETE CRETE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Sparta and Allies Lydian Kingdom Athens and Allies 10 A 1Although the Persian Wars were fought C In 490 B.C., Darius, still angry about the between the Greeks and Persians, they actually burning of Sardis, decided to invade Athens. began with the Lydians. 2In the middle of the sixth 11About 25,000 Persians landed at the Plain century B.C., the Greek city-states along the coast of Marathon, where they were met by a much of Asia Minor (present-day Turkey) were conquered smaller Athenian army. 12The Athenians beat the by the Lydians, and their king, Croesus (ruled 560- Persians, who retreated to their ships and set sail 546 B.C.). 3Croesus minted coins using gold from for Athens, thinking they’d conquer Athens while the river Pactolus. 4He was so wealthy that the its army was marching home. 13The Athenians phrase, “rich as Croesus,” is still used today. realized the Persian’s plan and raced back to Athens, and defeated the Persians again. 14Legend B 5Meanwhile, in Persia (present-day Iran), Cyrus has it that after the Battle of Marathon, a Greek the Great (ruled c. 560-530 B.C.) had united two warrior ran about 25 miles to Athens to announce, big tribes into a huge, strong empire. 6In 546 “Nike!” (victory in Greek) and then fell dead from B.C., Cyrus and the Persian army conquered the exhaustion.
    [Show full text]
  • Roy Van Wijk Athens, Thebes and Plataia and the End of the Sixth
    Roy Van Wijk Athens, Thebes and Plataia and the end of the sixth century BCE* Abstract: One of the key events in the relations between the Athenians and Thebans was the Plataian decision to align themselves with the Athenians at the end of the sixth century BCE. This decision shook up the contemporary political landscape and proved to be a source of hostility between the two neighbouring polities throughout the fifth and fourth centuries. The orthodox view holds that the original alignment took place in 519 during the Peisistratid tyranny, based on the date given by Thucydides 3.68.5. This date, in the mind of some scholars, seems contradictory with the story of the Plataian alignment as given by Herodotus (6.108.1-6.). This inconsistency resulted in a search for alternatives that fit the Herodotean narrative better. To accommodate this change, they relied on emendating the Thucydidean text, but there is no sign of corruption in this part. Emendation of a text is best avoided, although the controversy merits attention. Therefore, in this article it will be argued that the two narratives – the Thucydidean and the Herodotean – need to be separated. What follows is a renewed chronology of Plataian- Athenian relations. The orthodox date (519) was the date of an original Peisistratid-Plataian alliance that did not lead to hostilities with Thebes. Instead, it is in the context of the foundation of the Athenian democracy and the subsequent clashes with Thebes after 507/6 that the Herodotean narrative should be placed. * First and foremost I would like express my gratitude to Albert Schachter, who made invaluable suggestions to improve this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Hunt Professor Department of Classics University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0248 [email protected] Office: 303-492-6447
    Peter Hunt Professor Department of Classics University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0248 [email protected] office: 303-492-6447 I) Academic Career A) Education Ph.D. Classics, Stanford University, September 1994 Scholar Exchange Program, Princeton University, 1990–91 M.A. Classics, University of Colorado, Boulder, June 1988 B.A. Chemistry (minor Ancient History), Swarthmore College, June 1984 B) Academic Positions University of Colorado, Boulder: Assistant Professor, 2000–2004, Associate Chair for Graduate Studies, 2003–2005, 2006-2007, Associate Professor, 2004–, Chair 2009-2011, Professor 2011– Harvard University, Visiting Associate Professor, Spring 2009 Davidson College: Visiting Assistant Professor, 1997–99 Vassar College: Visiting Assistant Professor, 1996–97 Stanford University: Teaching Fellow and Lecturer, 1994–96 II) Scholarship A) Books Slaves, Warfare, and Ideology in the Greek Historians, Cambridge University Press, 1998. Paperback reprint, 2002. Chapter 7 reprinted in Classical and Medieval Literature Criticism 117 (2010). War, Peace, and Alliance in Demosthenes' Athens. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Winner of the Kayden Book Prize (University of Colorado). Greek and Roman Slavery. Under contract with Blackwell Publishing; in preparation. B) Peer-Refereed Journal Articles "The Helots at the Battle of Plataea," Historia 46.2 (1997): 129–44. "The Slaves and the Generals of Arginusae," American Journal of Philology 123.3 (2001): 363–84. C) Invited Chapters and Articles The Macmillan Encyclopedia of World Slavery (ed. Paul Finkelman and Joseph C. Miller), Macmillan Reference, 1998: articles on the following: Concubinage (500 words), Familia Caesaris (500 words), Freedmen, Roman (1500 words), Manumission, Roman (2000 words), Miners (1000 words), Peculium (250 words), Spartacus (750 words).
    [Show full text]
  • The Audiences of Herodotus
    THE AUDIENCES OF HERODOTUS THE INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE ON THE HISTORIES by IAN CODY OLIVER B.A., University of Texas at Austin, 2010 M.A., University of Colorado Boulder, 2012 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics 2017 This thesis entitled: The Audiences of Herodotus: The Influence of Performance on the Histories written by Ian Cody Oliver has been approved for the Department of Classics Peter Hunt, Committee Chair Jackie Elliott, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Oliver, Ian Cody (Ph.D., Classics) The Audiences of Herodotus: The Influence of Performance on the Histories Thesis directed by Professor Peter Hunt Scholars have long recognized that Herodotus wrote his Histories when literature was often researched, composed, and circulated by oral rather than written means. Like his contemporaries, Herodotus gave oral demonstrations of his expertise (in Greek, epideixeis) in widely diverse settings across Greece. Most modern scholarship, however, treats Herodotus’ Histories as fundamentally unrelated to these performances, assuming instead that, in the Histories, Herodotus wrote for a single, broad, and Panhellenic readership. My dissertation argues that significant portions of the Histories in fact follow Herodotus’ earlier oral performances closely—sometimes so closely that the original audience and historical context can be identified. In my dissertation, I analyze three Herodotean battle narratives (Plataea, Salamis, and Thermopylae) where anomalies in composition appear to reflect these narratives’ origins as oral epideixeis with specific original performance dates.
    [Show full text]