Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Earth Economics i Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State January 2015 Report Version 1.2 Prepared By: Prepared For: Earth Economics Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Tacoma, Washington Olympia, Washington Primary Authors: Tania Briceno, Ecological Economist, Earth Economics Greg Schundler, GIS and Research Analyst, Earth Economics Suggested Citation: Briceno, T., Schundler, G. 2015. Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. Production Team: Aaron Schwartz, Research Analyst, Earth Economics Angela Fletcher, Research Analyst and Graphic Designer, Earth Economics Johnny Mojica, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Peter Casey, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Contributors: Wendy Brown, Advisor and Editor, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Jim Fox, Advisor and Editor, James Fox Consulting John Loomis, Advisor and Editor, Colorado State University Acknowledgements: Leslie Connelly and Kaleen Cottingham from Washington’s Recreation and Conservation Office provided valuable feedback as well as Jim Cahill from the Washington State Office of Financial Management. Rebecca Hill from Colorado State University provided feedback on IMPLAN modelling and Randy Rosenberger from Oregon State University helped through his recreation value database. We would also like to thank all the agencies and associations that collaborated with data collection. Thanks to Brenden Mclane, Chelsey Aiton, and Professor Robert Aguirre who provided assistance as part of course work for the University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS & Sustainability Management. Cover image by Jon DeJong, a creative commons image, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/. ©2016 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. ii Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Contents Executive Summary ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� vi Glossary of Terms Used in this Study ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ix Chapter 1� Introduction, Methods and Concepts ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 The Outdoor Recreation Economy in Washington .............................................................................1 Recreation Land Types Studied ...........................................................................................................3 Methodology Overview ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 Chapter 2� Expenditures and Contributions of All Outdoor Recreational Land Types ��������������������������������8 Participation and Expenditure Analysis of All Recreational Lands...................................................... 8 Activity-based Expenditure Analysis ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 11 Economic Contribution Analysis for All Recreational Lands .............................................................13 Chapter 3� Expenditures and Contribution of Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands ���������������������������������19 Economic Contribution Analysis for Public Lands .............................................................................25 Expenditures and Economic Contributions in Counties Resulting from Recreation on Public Lands ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 27 Chapter 4� Expenditures and Contributions of Private Outdoor Recreation Lands �����������������������������������29 Participation and Expenditures in Private Recreational Lands .........................................................29 The Economic Contribution of Recreation on Private Lands ............................................................ 32 Chapter 5� Economic Impact from Out-of-State Visitors to Washington’s Outdoor Recreational Lands �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34 Participant Days and Expenditures by Outdoor Recreation Visitors ................................................ 35 Economic Impact from Outdoor Recreation Associated with Out-of-State Visitors ........................ 37 Chapter 6� Ecosystem Services on Outdoor Recreational Lands in Washington ���������������������������������������39 Introduction to Ecosystem Services ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 39 Recreation as an Ecosystem Service .................................................................................................40 Other Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................................... 41 Methodology ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 41 Ecosystem Service Value Results ......................................................................................................44 Other Benefits from Outdoor Recreation ....................................................................................... 47 Earth Economics iii Chapter 7� Conclusions and Further Research ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������49 Endnotes ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 51 Appendix A� List of Recreational Lands Included in this Study ����������������������������������������������������������������� 53 Appendix B� Methodology and Data Sources for Participant Days and Expenditure Profiles by Land Type �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������57 Appendix C� Literature Used for Participant Day and Expenditures Data ����������������������������������������������������������� 61 Appendix D� Participation and Expenditures for Major Recreational Activities in Washington State �������68 Appendix E� Expenditure Profiles, Sector Mapping, & IMPLAN Assumptions ������������������������������������������79 Appendix F� County Economic Expenditures and Contribution Results for All Recreational Lands �����������83 Appendix G� Legislative District Expenditures and Participant Days ���������������������������������������������������������88 Appendix H� Economic Contributions Resulting From Recreation on Public Lands, by County ����������������92 Appendix I� Calculations for Out-of-State Visitors ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������94 Appendix J� Ecosystem Service Valuation Methodology���������������������������������������������������������������������������96 iv Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Tables Table 1� Participant Days and Expenditures on All Recreational Land Types ����������������������������������������������9 Table 2� Economic Contributions, All Recreational Lands �������������������������������������������������������������������������13 Table 3� Economic Contributions by Economic Sector, All Recreational Lands �����������������������������������������13 Table 4� Local and State Tax Contributions, All Recreational Lands ���������������������������������������������������������� 14 Table 5� Employment Associated with Outdoor Recreation, by Sector ���������������������������������������������������� 14 Table 6� Acreage of Public Recreational Lands ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 20 Table 7� Participant Days and Expenditures by Public Land Type �������������������������������������������������������������� 21 Table 8� Economic Contribution from Public Recreational Lands ��������������������������������������������������������������25 Table 9� Economic Contribution by Economic Sector, Public Lands ���������������������������������������������������������� 26 Table 10� Local and State Tax Contributions, Public Lands ������������������������������������������������������������������������ 26 Table 11� Employment Associated with Public Land Recreation, By Sector ���������������������������������������������� 26 Table 12� Expenditures and Participation in Outdoor Recreation on Private Lands ����������������������������������30 Table 13� Economic Contributions from Private Recreational Lands �������������������������������������������������������� 32 Table 14� Economic Contributions by Economic Sector, Private Lands ����������������������������������������������������� 32 Table 15� Local and State Tax Contributions, Private Lands ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 32 Table 16� Employment Associated with Outdoor Recreation, Private Lands ��������������������������������������������33 Table 17� Out-of-State Visitors and Associated Recreation-Related Expenditures by Land Type ��������������36 Table 18� Economic Impact from Out-of-State
Recommended publications
  • Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: the Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O
    United States Department of Silvicultural Options for Young- Agriculture Forest Service Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: Pacific Northwest Research Station The Capitol Forest Study— General Technical Report Establishment and First Results PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Editors Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, David D. Marshall, research forester, and Dean S. DeBell, (retired), Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193. Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: The Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O. Curtis, David D. Marshall, and Dean S. DeBell, Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Contributors Kamal M. Ahmed, research associate, University of Washington, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700 Hans Andersen, Ph.D. candidate, University of Washington, College of Forest Re- sources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Gordon A. Bradley, professor, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Leslie C. Brodie, forester, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Andrew B. Carey, wildlife biologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Terry A. Curtis, photogrammetry supervisor, forester, Washington Department of Natu- ral Resources, Olympia, WA 98501 Dean S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail FY 2017 Appropriations Request
    Photo ©2016 Alasdair Fowler Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail FY 2017 Appropriations Request Prepared by: Pacific Crest Trail Association www.pcta.org Graphic design donated by Cover Photos by Alasdair Fowler, Shonda Feather and Carolyn Tepolt Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail FY2017 Appropriations Request The Pacific Crest Trail Association (PCTA) respectfully asks Congress to support the following FY2017 appropriations to protect, preserve and promote the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT): I. Land PCT Corridor Acquisition Projects & Water U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Budget Request Conservation $7.0 million Fund California—Landers Meadow, trail and resource (LWCF) protection within the Sequoia National Forest; Trinity Divide, trail and resource protection within the Shasta- Trinity National Forest, Donomore Meadows, trail and resource protection within the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest. Washington—Columbia Gorge, trail and resource protection in and adjacent to the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area; Stevens Pass, purchase portion of the trail that currently has no easement. $250,000—LWCF line item for program administration Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Budget Request $515,000 California—California Desert Southwest, purchase parcels within the San Gorgonio Wilderness to create an uninterrupted wilderness experience. Oregon—Cascade-Siskiyou Area, trail and resource $7.8 million protection in southern Oregon near the Klamath Basin. U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Budget Request II. Capital $2.1 million—allocation
    [Show full text]
  • NWSA09 Abs V.12
    PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS NORTHWEST SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION 81ST ANNUAL MEETING The Paci!c Northwest in a Changing Environment University of Washington Seattle, Washington 25-28 March 2009 SPONSORS J.L. Darling Corporation Cover Photo: Mt. Shuksan, North Cascades, Washington Photo by Robin Lesher i Program and Abstracts Northwest Scientific Association 81st Annual Meeting University of Washington Seattle, Washington March 25-28, 2009 Held in Cooperation with: University of Washington College of Forest Resources Earth and Space Sciences Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture Elwha River Consortium Northwest Lichenologists ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SPONSORS........................................................................................................................i LOCAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE ...................................................................................iv LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT....................................................................................v CONFERENCE SITE MAP...............................................................................................vi PROGRAM AT A GLANCE.............................................................................................vii SESSION SCHEDULE (THURSDAY).............................................................................. A PROGRAM OVERVIEW .............................................................................................C SESSION SCHEDULE (FRIDAY) ....................................................................................D
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data
    WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data Generated from the WTU Herbarium Database September 24, 2021 at 7:10 am http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/collections/search.php Specimen records: 197 Images: 54 Search Parameters: Label Query: Genus = "Pseudotsuga" Pinaceae Pinaceae Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. glauca (Mayr) Franco U.S.A., WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY: Cascade Mountains of Western Washington: Cedar River bridge at U.S.A., OREGON, WALLOWA COUNTY: Barneston. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. U.S. Forest Service Road #39. Elev. 1000 ft. Salt Creek Summit Sno-Park, 1.0 mi. east of parking area; jct. Forest 47° 23.33' 33" N, 121° 51.68' 51" W; T22N R7E S14 Road 3915 and 100. Woods, riparian area, and roadside near bridge. About 40 meters. Elev. 6206 ft. Phenology: Cones. Origin: Native. 45° 12.65' N, 117° 3.88' W; T4S R46E S16 SE Lodgepole pine, Abies lasiocarpa meadow; surrounded by burned P. F. Zika 16042 26 May 2001 areas. Female cones. Phenology: Fertile. Origin: Native. with Jeff Walker, David Kiefer, Kari Stices, Bill Winije Robert Goff 02-76 19 Jul 2002 WTU-350851 with Suzanne Bagshaw, Dale Blum, David Giblin, Richard Robohm. WTU-359753 Pinaceae Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Pinaceae U.S.A., WASHINGTON, WHATCOM COUNTY: Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Ross Lake National Recreation Area: South of Lightning Creek on East Bank Trail. U.S.A., WASHINGTON, CLALLAM COUNTY: Elev. 1640 ft. Near timberline on Hurricane Ridge, Olympic Mountains. 48° 51' 37.94176" N, 121° 1' 0.60756" W; UTM Zone 10, Elev.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
    Final Draft THURSTON COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Inventory and Characterization Report SMA Grant Agreements: G0800104 and G1300026 June 30, 2013 Prepared By: Thurston County Planning Department Building # 1, 2nd Floor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW Olympia, WA 98502-6045 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATES FOR CITIES WITHIN THURSTON COUNTY ...................................................................... 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 SHORELINE JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 DETERMINING SHORELINE JURISDICTION LIMITS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Natural Landmarks Program
    The National Park Service National Natural Landmarks Program Strong Partnerships are Key to the Program's Success. Promoting Conservation The NNL Program has become through Cooperation more service oriented in the last 10 years, with coordinators work­ The National Natural Landmarks (NNL) have owner permission. The National Park ing diligently to find technical Program offers participants the opportunity to Service (NPS) administers the program and specialists who can advise share information, solve problems cooperatively, regularly reports on the condition of the NNLs. landowners on how to care for and conserve important natural areas. For over The selection process is rigorous: to be considered 40 years, the NNL Program has involved private, for NNL status, a site must be one of the best their special sites. While funding municipal, state, and federal landowners, all work­ examples of a natural region's characteristic biotic for projects is not the norm, in ing together toward the conservation of natural or geologic features. The NNL designation can some cases, regional coordinators resources. Land acquisition by the federal govern­ only be removed if the values for which it was ment is not a goal of this program; NNLs are designated are lost or destroyed, or if there was an have been successful in helping nationally significant sites owned by a variety of error in the evaluation or designation procedures NNL owners obtain small grants. land stewards, and participation in the program is for the site. The regulations that currently govern The NNL designation is meaning­ voluntary. Established in 1962, the program aims the NNL Program were revised in 1999 to better ful to many program participants; to encourage and support voluntary preservation protect the interests of private landowners who of sites that illustrate the geological and ecological participate in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Game Status and Trend Report
    STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 Game Status and Trend Report AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Jay Inslee Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Dr. Jim Unsworth Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Eric Gardner Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Anis Aoude Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017. 2017 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Blue Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone ....................................................................... 2 Columbia Plateau Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................... 6 East Columbia Gorge Mule Deer Management Zone ............................................................13 East Slope Cascades Mule Deer Management Zone ..............................................................17 Naches Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................................... 22 Northern Rocky Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone
    [Show full text]
  • Spring/ Summer 2018
    CATALOG SPRING/ SUMMER 2018 S18_Cover_Alt.indd 2 8/30/17 11:13 AM WHEN THE WORLD SUDDENLY CHANGES “Give him to us! We will kill him!” About one hundred belligerent men had gathered in front of the tent, calling for me. Greg Vernovage, an American mountain guide, and Melissa (Arnot) guarded the tent and tried to keep the Sherpas at bay. A lone Sherpa, Pang Nuru, was standing next to them. He had nothing to do with us but was obviously perturbed by the situation and knew that this was just not right. I could hear a fierce discussion. The Sherpas ordered me to come out. I would be the first they would beat to death, and when they had finished with me they would go for the other two. I felt powerless and could not see a way out. How could we possibly turn the situation into our favor? What would happen to us? It was over. I couldn’t do anything. My hands were tied. I thought about how ridiculous the situation was. How many expeditions had I been on and then come back from in one piece? How many critical situations had I survived? And now I was crouching in a tent on Mount Everest, just about to be lynched by a mob of Sherpas. This was impossible and the whole situation so absurd that I had no hope. The Sherpas were incalculable, but I would probably not survive. I started to imagine how my life would end by stoning. —Excerpt from Ueli Steck: My Life in Climbing MOUNTAINEERS BOOKS is the publishing division of The Mountaineers, a nonprofit membership organization that has been a leader in outdoor education for more than 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVA Grants 2021-2023
    Nonhighway Road Projects Grants Awarded Nonhighway and Off-road Vehicle Activities 2021-2023 Project Number and Applicant Rank Score Type1 Grant Applicant Project Name Grant Request Match Total Grant Award U.S. Forest Service, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, 1 62.69 20-2350 M Snoqualmie Ranger District Front Country Maintenance $115,400 $51,000 $166,400 $115,400 Snoqualmie Ranger District 2 62.31 20-2229 M U.S Forest Service, Colville National Forest Colville National Forest Facility Maintenance and Operations $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 $150,000 U.S. Forest Service, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Methow Valley Ranger District Developed Recreation Campground 3 60.69 20-2133 M $150,000 $274,984 $424,984 $150,000 Methow Valley Ranger District Maintenance U.S. Forest Service, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Entiat Ranger District Campgrounds and Dispersed Maintenance and 4 60.54 20-1964 M $150,000 $80,000 $230,000 $150,000 Entiat Ranger District Operations U.S. Forest Service, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. Cle 5 59.15 20-2064 M Cle Elum Ranger District Front Country Maintenance and Operations $150,000 $101,000 $251,000 $150,000 Elum Ranger District U.S Forest Service, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Wenatchee River Ranger District Developed and Dispersed 6 58.85 20-2316 M $118,000 $82,800 $200,800 $118,000 Wenatchee River Ranger District Maintenance and Operations U.S. Forest Service, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Cle 7 58.69 20-2106 M Cle Elum Ranger District Sanitation Rentals $30,000 $3,400 $33,400 $30,000 Elum Ranger District U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aa Rec Guide 6 15.Indd
    10 Recreation and DNR SITE LOCATIONS 5 You will fi nd a wide variety of recreational opportunities 1 2 How to use the Guide: on land managed by the Department of Natural 4 3 FACILITIES TRAILS WATER ACTIVITIES Resources. In addition to the facilities listed here, DNR General locations are shown on the map as maintains more than 400 miles of trails. Activities shown in Loomis 11 numbered triangles. For directions to a Camping unit Hiking Beach access this guide, such as trail riding, hiking, vista viewing, water, W A S H I N G T O N State and snow sports are associated with developed facilities. Forest particular site, match the number found on the Picnic unit Crosscountry skiing Fishing DNR-managed recreation facilities are typically small and map to the corresponding number in the Shelter Horse Hand boat launch 12 13 rustic; none have electrical or sewage hookups. Some sites 14 Eastern or Western Washington directory. Drinking water Mountain bike Boat launch have drinking water, (Warning: not all available water is Information regarding setting and facilities are Toilet Motorcycle Mooring buoy potable.) Sites with camping have recreational vehicle 15 also included. The number following a camp or View ATV parking, tent pads, fi re grills, and picnic tables. Picnic units 17 16 picnic symbol refers to the total number of Interpretive site 4x4 also have tables and fi re grills. There is no fee charged for 8 recreating on DNR-managed land. units available at that site. Corral Snowmobile 9 7 For example: No campfi res allowed Loup 6 Land at work for you..
    [Show full text]
  • 2013–2018 Washington State Trails Plan
    2013–2018 WASHINGTON STATE TRAILS PLAN 2013-2018 Washington State Trails Plan i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Primary Authors/Editors Amanda C. Ritchie, Research Associate, Responsive Management Mark Damian Duda, Executive Director, Responsive Management Michael Fraidenburg, Owner, The Cooperation Company Contributors Tom Beppler, Research Associate, Responsive Management Kaleen Cottingham, Director, Recreation and Conservation Office Sarah Gage, Policy and Special Projects Manager, Recreation and Conservation Office Recreation and Conservation Office Staff Lorinda Anderson Rebecca Connolly Dominga Soliz Marguerite Austin Karl Jacobs Sarah Thirtyacre Rory Calhoun Darrell Jennings Greg Tudor Scott Chapman Steve McLellan Susan Zemek Leslie Connelly Nona Snell Recreation and Conservation Funding Board Members Bill Chapman, Chair, citizen member, Mercer Island Elizabeth Bloomfield, citizen member, Yakima County Ted Willhite, citizen member, Twisp Pete Mayer, citizen member, Everett Harriet Spanel, citizen member, Bellingham Dave Brittell, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Don Hoch, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Jed Herman, Washington Department of Natural Resources Trails Plan Advisory Committee Linda Berry-Maraist, North Kitsap Trails Association John Bottelli, Spokane County Parks and Recreation Dave Bryant, Richland Parks and Recreation Doug Conner, Eastern Washington Dirt Riders Brad Cownover, U.S. Forest Service Brian Crowley, Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance Karen Daubert, Washington Trails Association Tom Eksten, Bothell
    [Show full text]