Recreation Guide Q&A Activities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology
Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Geosciences Student Work Geosciences 2021 Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology Cole R. McGregor Eastern Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/geosci_student Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation McGregor, Cole R., "Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology" (2021). Geosciences Student Work. 1. https://dc.ewu.edu/geosci_student/1 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Geosciences at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Student Work by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology Cole McGregor Eastern Washington University, Department of Geology Abstract: The structural and hydrogeology of Dishman Hills Conservation Area was interpreted to gain a better picture of its interaction with the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie aquifer. The rock in this area is Precambrian Ravalli Group with granitic migmatites. This is due to Figure 9: exhumation causing decompression melting in between the bed layers. Other rocks such as amphibolite, gneiss, schist, quartzite, and phyllite are seen along with granitic dikes (WSDNR). This rock type covers all of the Dishman area and is Precambrian in age. Due to The image shows areas of water ponding that don’t tectonic forces in the Spokane area, fractures have also formed within the Precambrian rock. Water will concentrate in fracture zones, enter the aquifer as green polygons. These seem to be known to be areas of groundwater drainage. -
Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: the Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O
United States Department of Silvicultural Options for Young- Agriculture Forest Service Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: Pacific Northwest Research Station The Capitol Forest Study— General Technical Report Establishment and First Results PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Editors Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, David D. Marshall, research forester, and Dean S. DeBell, (retired), Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193. Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: The Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O. Curtis, David D. Marshall, and Dean S. DeBell, Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Contributors Kamal M. Ahmed, research associate, University of Washington, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700 Hans Andersen, Ph.D. candidate, University of Washington, College of Forest Re- sources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Gordon A. Bradley, professor, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Leslie C. Brodie, forester, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Andrew B. Carey, wildlife biologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Terry A. Curtis, photogrammetry supervisor, forester, Washington Department of Natu- ral Resources, Olympia, WA 98501 Dean S. -
Preserving Trails and Providing Solutions May-June
PONDEROSA BACK COUNTRY HORSEMEN OF WASHINGTON Preserving Trails and Providing Solutions May-June 2018 VOLUNTEER HOURS DUE BY MAY 25! Please be sure to turn in your volunteer hours to Carol Klar by May 25! Any time you spend working on BCH stuff (phone calls, trail clearing, work parties, paperwork, whatever) counts towards your volunteer hours. If you have questions, give Carol a call. BCHA Annual Board Meeting By Ken Carmichael The BCHA board meeting was held in Airway Heights Washington April 23-25. This annual event is hosted by a different state each year. It is a time to be very proud of being a BCHW member. The team that put on the event did a great job. Our national directors Darrell Wallace and Jason Ridlon had the event brought to Washington and helped arrange for the nice facilities. Alternate Director Bill McKenna coordinated all of the volunteers. BCHW President Kathy Young and many volunteers were on site to help. Among those was PBCH member Doug Bailey helping with registration and other duties. BCHW Executive Director Nicole Sedgwick provided the other states with an update on the status of the Your Membership program and I spoke about the Membership Development Program. Darrell is also Vice President of BCHA. BCHW member Mike McGlenn was elected to the Executive Committee of BCHA. BCHW continues to be a leader among the states. This board meeting provided many opportunities for sharing information among the states and committees. A new feature was a break out into 4 regions to discuss issues. Then each region had the opportunity to discuss these issues with the BCHA 10 standing committees. -
Feature Web 05-04
the Centers for Disease Control, only 15 percent of the Healthy Hiking U.S. adult population is getting enough physical activity. “Our goal,” says Julie CHIEFELBEIN Gerberding, Director of the S AVE CDC, “is to help people D understand that even modest activity such as walking or gardening is a step in the right direction.” According to the American Hiking Society, the benefits of hiking or walking just 30 minutes a day are impressive: ⌧Decreased cholesterol ⌧Lowering of blood pressure ⌧Releasing of calming endorphins ⌧Preventing osteoporosis ⌧Relieving back pain ⌧Reducing insulin needed by diabetics Detailed info on these Getting fit on studies are available at www.americanhiking.org. the trail is For those of us who already hike, none of this is terribly surprising. easy, fun, and “It’s a great break from the routine,” says Debra Gore, a good for you. family practice doctor with Group Health in Spokane. “It’s a great stress relief from the hassles of sitting in front of a computer all day.” And for those who want to get out more and enjoy these benefits, there’s good news: you don’t have to be a buff mountain By Andrew Engelson years later, he’s still getting up into the climber to get started. It’s easy. backcountry. He and other hikers his As with any exercise program, if Julian Ansell is evidence that hiking age are as good a case as any for the you’re just beginning, consult your is good for you. physical and emotional benefits of doctor or medical provider first to The retired physician and Washing- hiking. -
Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State
Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Earth Economics i Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State January 2015 Report Version 1.2 Prepared By: Prepared For: Earth Economics Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Tacoma, Washington Olympia, Washington Primary Authors: Tania Briceno, Ecological Economist, Earth Economics Greg Schundler, GIS and Research Analyst, Earth Economics Suggested Citation: Briceno, T., Schundler, G. 2015. Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. Production Team: Aaron Schwartz, Research Analyst, Earth Economics Angela Fletcher, Research Analyst and Graphic Designer, Earth Economics Johnny Mojica, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Peter Casey, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Contributors: Wendy Brown, Advisor and Editor, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Jim Fox, Advisor and Editor, James Fox Consulting John Loomis, Advisor and Editor, Colorado State University Acknowledgements: Leslie Connelly and Kaleen Cottingham from Washington’s Recreation and Conservation Office provided valuable feedback as well as Jim Cahill from the Washington State Office of Financial Management. Rebecca Hill from Colorado State University provided feedback on IMPLAN modelling and Randy Rosenberger from Oregon State University helped through his recreation value database. We would also like to thank all the agencies and associations that collaborated with data collection. Thanks to Brenden Mclane, Chelsey Aiton, and Professor Robert Aguirre who provided assistance as part of course work for the University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS & Sustainability Management. Cover image by Jon DeJong, a creative commons image, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/. ©2016 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. -
NWSA09 Abs V.12
PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS NORTHWEST SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION 81ST ANNUAL MEETING The Paci!c Northwest in a Changing Environment University of Washington Seattle, Washington 25-28 March 2009 SPONSORS J.L. Darling Corporation Cover Photo: Mt. Shuksan, North Cascades, Washington Photo by Robin Lesher i Program and Abstracts Northwest Scientific Association 81st Annual Meeting University of Washington Seattle, Washington March 25-28, 2009 Held in Cooperation with: University of Washington College of Forest Resources Earth and Space Sciences Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture Elwha River Consortium Northwest Lichenologists ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SPONSORS........................................................................................................................i LOCAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE ...................................................................................iv LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT....................................................................................v CONFERENCE SITE MAP...............................................................................................vi PROGRAM AT A GLANCE.............................................................................................vii SESSION SCHEDULE (THURSDAY).............................................................................. A PROGRAM OVERVIEW .............................................................................................C SESSION SCHEDULE (FRIDAY) ....................................................................................D -
WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data
WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data Generated from the WTU Herbarium Database September 24, 2021 at 7:10 am http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/collections/search.php Specimen records: 197 Images: 54 Search Parameters: Label Query: Genus = "Pseudotsuga" Pinaceae Pinaceae Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. glauca (Mayr) Franco U.S.A., WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY: Cascade Mountains of Western Washington: Cedar River bridge at U.S.A., OREGON, WALLOWA COUNTY: Barneston. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. U.S. Forest Service Road #39. Elev. 1000 ft. Salt Creek Summit Sno-Park, 1.0 mi. east of parking area; jct. Forest 47° 23.33' 33" N, 121° 51.68' 51" W; T22N R7E S14 Road 3915 and 100. Woods, riparian area, and roadside near bridge. About 40 meters. Elev. 6206 ft. Phenology: Cones. Origin: Native. 45° 12.65' N, 117° 3.88' W; T4S R46E S16 SE Lodgepole pine, Abies lasiocarpa meadow; surrounded by burned P. F. Zika 16042 26 May 2001 areas. Female cones. Phenology: Fertile. Origin: Native. with Jeff Walker, David Kiefer, Kari Stices, Bill Winije Robert Goff 02-76 19 Jul 2002 WTU-350851 with Suzanne Bagshaw, Dale Blum, David Giblin, Richard Robohm. WTU-359753 Pinaceae Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Pinaceae U.S.A., WASHINGTON, WHATCOM COUNTY: Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii Ross Lake National Recreation Area: South of Lightning Creek on East Bank Trail. U.S.A., WASHINGTON, CLALLAM COUNTY: Elev. 1640 ft. Near timberline on Hurricane Ridge, Olympic Mountains. 48° 51' 37.94176" N, 121° 1' 0.60756" W; UTM Zone 10, Elev. -
Visitor Map 2019–2020 Map Visitor Regional Official
Official Regional Visitor Map 2019–2020 Map Visitor Regional Official 49˚ North Deer Attractions (continued) Spokane Regional Map Legend Mountain Resort Lake I Silverwood Theme Park I Timberline Adventures Mt. Spokane Ski The Northwest’s largest theme and World-class, canopy style, zip-line & Snowboard Park Accommodations Golf Course Camping & RV Resort Mt. Spokane water park. silverwoodthemepark. tours. The ultimate outdoor experience. com, 208.683.3400, 27843 N Hwy 95, ziptimberline.com, 208.820.2080, 210 Athol, ID Sherman Ave #1, Coeur d’Alene, ID Regional Attraction Regional Accommodations 1C Spokane Tribe Casino Mt. Spokane Trails “Every time I visit Spokane, Events you don’t want to miss 24-hour gaming excitement. Get a Sun Hiking & Biking Trail Centennial Trail visitspokane.com Club Card today. spokanetribecasino.com, 1.888.SPOKANE I find something new.” 877.786.9467, 14300 W State Route 2 Mountain Resort Downtown Detail (reverse) 2 Hwy, Airway Heights, WA more, any night of the week the of night any more, — 1889 Magazine Live music, dancing, theater and and theater dancing, music, Live Water Exploration A Inlander Restaurant Week Spokane County Entertainment Dragon Creek State Park City of Spokane Valley Last Week of February Interstate Fair to local boutiques local to It’s the most delicious time of the year. February means one thing in Everything from big-name retailers retailers big-name from Everything B3 Baymont Inn & Suites B4 My Place Hotel Second Weekend in September Shops Enjoy free WiFi and breakfast. Indoor Economy, extended-stay hotel Spokane — Inlander Restaurant Week. From February 21 – March 2, Golf An annual event that marks the beginning of fall, the Spokane Wild Rose RV Park pool and spa. -
Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
Final Draft THURSTON COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Inventory and Characterization Report SMA Grant Agreements: G0800104 and G1300026 June 30, 2013 Prepared By: Thurston County Planning Department Building # 1, 2nd Floor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW Olympia, WA 98502-6045 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATES FOR CITIES WITHIN THURSTON COUNTY ...................................................................... 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 SHORELINE JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 DETERMINING SHORELINE JURISDICTION LIMITS .................................................................................................................. -
National Natural Landmarks Program
The National Park Service National Natural Landmarks Program Strong Partnerships are Key to the Program's Success. Promoting Conservation The NNL Program has become through Cooperation more service oriented in the last 10 years, with coordinators work The National Natural Landmarks (NNL) have owner permission. The National Park ing diligently to find technical Program offers participants the opportunity to Service (NPS) administers the program and specialists who can advise share information, solve problems cooperatively, regularly reports on the condition of the NNLs. landowners on how to care for and conserve important natural areas. For over The selection process is rigorous: to be considered 40 years, the NNL Program has involved private, for NNL status, a site must be one of the best their special sites. While funding municipal, state, and federal landowners, all work examples of a natural region's characteristic biotic for projects is not the norm, in ing together toward the conservation of natural or geologic features. The NNL designation can some cases, regional coordinators resources. Land acquisition by the federal govern only be removed if the values for which it was ment is not a goal of this program; NNLs are designated are lost or destroyed, or if there was an have been successful in helping nationally significant sites owned by a variety of error in the evaluation or designation procedures NNL owners obtain small grants. land stewards, and participation in the program is for the site. The regulations that currently govern The NNL designation is meaning voluntary. Established in 1962, the program aims the NNL Program were revised in 1999 to better ful to many program participants; to encourage and support voluntary preservation protect the interests of private landowners who of sites that illustrate the geological and ecological participate in the program. -
PALOUSE to PINES LOOP
PA LOUSE to PINE S LOOP INDEX Sites Page Sites Page INFO KEY 1 1 Riverside State Park 2 28 Hawk Creek Falls 8 2 Little Spokane River Natural 29 Davenport Cemetery Area 30 Reardan Audubon Lake 31 Iller Creek Conservation Area 3 Lake Spokane Boat Launch 32 Liberty Lake County Park 4 Antoine Peak Conservation 3 33 Slavin Ranch Conservation Area 9 Area 5 Feryn Ranch Conservation 34 Steptoe Butte State Park Area 35 Kamiak Butte Park 6 Mt. Spokane State Park 37 Wawawai County Park 7 Pend Oreille County Park 38 Nisqually John Habitat 8 Calispell Lake 10 Management Unit 9 Usk Bridge 4 39 Greenbelt Trail 10 Tacoma Creek 40 Swallow’s Park 11 Flying Goose Ranch 41 Headgates County Park 12 Yocum Lake 42 Fields Spring State Park 13 Noisy Creek Campground 43 Chief Timothy Habitat Manage- 14 Elk Creek Trail 5 ment Unit 15 Salmo Priest Wilderness 44 WT Wooten Wildlife Area 16 Big Meadow Lake 11 45 Lewis and Clark Trail State Park 17 Little Pend Oreille National 46 Palouse Falls State Park Wildlife Refuge 47 Bassett Park 18 Sherman Creek Wildlife 6 48 Sprague Lake Area 49 Rock Lake 19 Log Flume Heritage Site 50 Smick Meadow 20 Sherman Pass Overlook 12 51 Turnbull National Wildlife 21 Mud Lake Refuge 22 Kettle River Rails-to-Trails 23 Lone Ranch Park 7 24 Lake Beth CREDITS 13 White-headed Woodpecker 25 Swan Lake Campground 26 Swanson Lakes © Ed Newbold, 2009 27 Telford The Great Washington State Birding Trail 1 PALOUSE to PINES LOOP INFO KEY Map ICons Best seasons for birding (spring, summer, fall, winter) Developed camping available, including restrooms; fee required Restroom available at day-use site Handicapped restroom and handicapped trail or viewing access Site located in an Important Bird Area Fee required; passes best obtained prior to travel. -
2017 Game Status and Trend Report
STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 Game Status and Trend Report AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Jay Inslee Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Dr. Jim Unsworth Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Eric Gardner Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Anis Aoude Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017. 2017 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Blue Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone ....................................................................... 2 Columbia Plateau Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................... 6 East Columbia Gorge Mule Deer Management Zone ............................................................13 East Slope Cascades Mule Deer Management Zone ..............................................................17 Naches Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................................... 22 Northern Rocky Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone